Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Analysis of the effects of exposure to acute hypoxia on oxidative lesions and tumour progression in a transgenic mouse breast cancer model

  • Tuula M Kalliomäki1, 2,
  • Gordon McCallum4,
  • Sarah Jane Lunt1, 2,
  • Peter G Wells4 and
  • Richard P Hill1, 2, 3Email author
BMC Cancer20088:151

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-151

Received: 21 August 2007

Accepted: 28 May 2008

Published: 28 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Tumour hypoxia is known to be a poor prognostic indicator, predictive of increased risk of metastatic disease and reduced survival. Genomic instability has been proposed as one of the potential mechanisms for hypoxic tumour progression. Both of these features are commonly found in many cancer types, but their relationship and association with tumour progression has not been examined in the same model.

Methods

To address this issue, we determined the effects of 6 week in vivo acute hypoxic exposure on the levels of mutagenic lipid peroxidation product, malondialdehyde, and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine DNA (8-oxo-dG) lesions in the transgenic polyomavirus middle T (PyMT) breast cancer mouse model.

Results

We observed significantly increased plasma lipid peroxidation and 8-oxo-dG lesion levels in the hypoxia-exposed mice. Consumption of malondialdehyde also induced a significant increase in the PyMT tumour DNA lesion levels, however, these increases did not translate into enhanced tumour progression. We further showed that the in vivo exposure to acute hypoxia induced accumulation of F4/80 positive tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), demonstrating a relationship between hypoxia and macrophages in an experimental model.

Conclusion

These data suggest that although exposure to acute hypoxia causes an increase in 8-oxo-dG lesions and TAMs in the PyMT tumours, these increases do not translate into significant changes in tumour progression at the primary or metastatic levels in this strong viral oncogene-driven breast cancer model.

Background

Hypoxia in tumours is a predictor of poor patient survival. This has been shown most extensively in soft tissue sarcoma, and in cervical and head and neck carcinoma patients where tumour hypoxia, as assessed by partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) measurements, is predictive of metastatic and/or disease-free survival [1]. In breast cancer patients the role of hypoxia as a predictor for survival has been demonstrated through immunohistochemical detection of hypoxia-dependent markers, such as hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) [2, 3].

The underlying mechanisms for hypoxia-mediated tumour progression are not well understood. Examinations of the effects of different types of tumour hypoxia on metastatic progression have suggested acute (cycling) hypoxia to be more important than chronic (diffusion limited) hypoxia [4, 5]. A potential association between acute hypoxia and genomic instability has been suggested by Comet assay data, which showed significantly increased numbers of single-strand DNA breaks in tumour samples from mice exposed to acute hypoxia compared with samples from mice exposed to chronic hypoxia (Cairns and Hill, unpublished data, 2004). Similar data has been reported in tumour cells exposed to increased number of hypoxic cycles in vitro, which resulted in increased number of DNA mutations, the frequency and types of which resembled those found in the same cells grown as tumours in vivo [6]. In vitro hypoxia exposure can also mediate larger scale genomic instability by increasing fragile site induction, gene amplification and cellular DNA content [79].

In some cases genomic instabilities in hypoxic tumours have been attributed to hypoxia-mediated inhibition of various DNA repair mediators from the homologous recombination, mismatch repair and non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathways [1013]. However, the role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS, RNS) in tumour progression as mediators of a "mutator phenotype" is also well documented [14, 15] and acute hypoxia is known to generate these species through multiple systems including mitochondria, xanthine oxidase, ferrylhemoglobin, NADPH oxidase and thymidine phosphorylase [16, 17]. Upon reaction with DNA, free radicals can generate mutagenic DNA lesions, such as 8-oxo-dG, that cause GC→TA transversions and structural changes compromising the transcriptional fidelity of the genome [18]. DNA damage can also be induced indirectly through free radical reaction with polyunsaturated fatty acids of cellular membranes and formation of lipid peroxidation products such as, isoprostanes, 4-hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde (MDA), shown to induce frame-shift mutations and base pair substitutions [19, 20].

Macrophages (MØs), which have been reported to be attracted to hypoxic tumour areas, are also a source of mutagenic superoxide (O2 -), nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-) species [21, 22]. In tumours, the MØs can promote tumour cell angiogenesis, invasion and survival by up-regulating genes such as GLUT-1, VEGF, CXCR4 and MIF [23] and high levels of these tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) can predict poor patient survival [24]. In support of the concept of TAM-mediated tumour progression, Pollard and colleagues showed that reducing the number of TAMs in the polyoma middle T (PyMT) breast cancer model by crossing it to op/op null mice with a mutation in the colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) gene, inhibited metastasis formation [25]. Further studies in the same model demonstrated that tumour cell movement and intravasation occur most frequently when the tumour cells are within 20 μm of a perivascular TAM [26].

In this study we examined the effect of acute (cyclic) hypoxia on tumour progression in relation to oxidative stress, TAMs and genomic instability in the MMTV-PyMT model. We demonstrated significantly increased levels of 8-oxo-dG lesions and TAM content in tumours from mice exposed to acute hypoxia but these increases did not translate into significant changes in tumour progression.

Methods

Animals

A breeder pair of mice with a PyMT transgene under the MMTV promoter (MMTV-PyMT634Mul), originally described by Guy et al., was obtained from Dr. Rama Khokha (Princess Margaret Hospital, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada) [27]. The mice were bred and maintained at the Animal Resource Centre of the Ontario Cancer Institute in compliance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Tissue samples were obtained at 2 weeks-of-age and screened for the presence of the PyMT transgene using the following primers (forward) 5' GGA AGC AAG TAC TTC ACA AGG 3' and (reverse) 5' GGA AAG TCA CTA GGA GCA GGG 3'. Mice were weaned at 3 weeks-of-age. All experiments were conducted with heterogeneous, virgin MMTV-PyMT or littermate wild type (WT) mice.

Hypoxia, malondialdehyde and 2-nitropropane treatments

For acute hypoxia (AH) experiments, mice were treated 5 times a week for 6 weeks, from 3 to 9 weeks-of-age. The hypoxia exposure consisted of 12 cycles of 10 min of air, followed by 10 min of 7% oxygen, balance nitrogen for a daily total of 4 hours, in airtight chambers as described previously [4]. Air control (AC) animals were exposed to a daily total of 4 hours of air in separate sealed chambers and cage control (CC) animals were left in their cages untouched. For HPLC and immunohistochemical analyses, mice were killed within 1 hour following the last gassing exposure at the age of 9 weeks to ensure similar tumour development for mammary tissues from mice treated for 4 hours/day during 1 day, 5 days or 6 weeks. For the tumour progression studies, the mice were left in their cages following the 6-week exposure until they reached the age of 88 days at which time the experiment was terminated and primary tumour growth and metastases were assessed. For determination of tumour hypoxia levels, mice were injected intraperitoneally (10 mM, 0.01 mL/g) with the exogenous hypoxia marker, EF5 ([2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl acetamide], Dr. Cameron Koch, University of Pennsylvania), 1 hour into the 4 hour gassing exposure during a reoxygenation cycle and killed within 1 hour of the last hypoxic cycle.

Animals treated with the lipid peroxidation product, malondialdehyde, (MDA, Sigma-Aldrich) received acidified water with 10 mM MDA, replaced twice a week while control animals (MDA-CC) received normal acidified water. The drug concentration was based on a measured average daily water consumption of 3.75 mL/mouse/day and calculated to give an approximate daily dose of 250 mg/kg [28]. Mice received the treated water for 6 weeks, from 4 to 10 weeks-of age at which point they were killed if used for HPLC analysis or left to develop their tumours to the age of 81 days if used for tumour progression analysis. An oxidizing agent, 2-nitropropane (2-NP, Sigma-Aldrich), reported to increase the number of 8-oxo-dG lesions in mice, was used as a positive control for the HPLC analyses [29]. It was administered intraperitoneally at 167 mg/kg in sterile olive oil vehicle and the mice were sacrificed 24 hours after a single dose at the age of 81 days.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Snap frozen tumour tissue from hypoxia-exposed mice was used for IHC staining of markers for macrophages (F4/80; ab6640: 1/300 1 hr R/T; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA), base excision repair (APE/Ref-1; ab82: 1/100 O/N 4°C; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA), hypoxia (EF5; ELK3-51: 1/50 O/N R/T; Dr. Cameron Koch, University of Pennsylvania) and vasculature (CD31; MEC13.3: 1/500 1 hr R/T; BD Pharmingen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Total area of positive staining in tumour sections, (1 per tumour, of approximately 43 mm2) with areas of necrosis and connective tissue excluded, was quantified with the positive pixel algorithm by Aperio ImageScope (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA). Inter-mouse variability of EF5 staining was quantified in 31 tumours from 11 different mice.

Assessment of primary and metastatic tumour burdens

In AH experiments primary tumour burden and the number of lung metastases were determined in 88-day-old mice. This time was reduced by a week to 81 days for MDA experiments to reduce the tumour burden prior to sacrifice since the MMTV-PyMT mice develop multiple primary tumours. The primary tumour burden was obtained by multiplying tumour length × tumour width and summing the individual tumour values of each mouse. Lungs were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 hours and then transferred to 70% ethanol. Macroscopic lung metastases in individual lung lobes were scored under a dissecting microscope. Micrometastases in each pair of lungs were summed from 4 sections (separated by 100 μm) stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H+E).

Lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and antioxidant reductive capacity assays

Heparinized blood from hypoxia- and control-exposed mice was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 1 min. The separated plasma was divided into 2 aliquots to prevent repeated freezing and thawing of the sample and stored at -80°C until analysis. Plasma samples were analysed with the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay, which measures MDA by reaction with thiobarbituric acid to form a red product that was quantified spectrophotometrically. MDA was quantified in 150 μL of plasma with 5 μl of 0.1 M butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT, Sigma-Aldrich). Following the addition of 62.5 μL of pure glacial acetic acid and 62.5 μL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid (Sigma-Aldrich), the samples were incubated at 50°C for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature for extraction of the coloured reaction product with 1 mL of 1-butanol, which was read with a spectrophotometer at 535 nm [30].

The antioxidant status of the plasma from AH and AC exposed mice was assayed with an antioxidant reductive capacity assay (NWK-ARC01; Northwest Life Science Specialties, Vancouver, WA). This 96-well assay is based on the ability of sample antioxidants to reduce Cu++ to Cu+, which reacts with bathocuproine to form a coloured product, read at 492 nm. Plasma samples from 10–11 mice were assayed in triplicate.

Quantification of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine lesions in DNA

DNA isolation and purification

The DNA extraction protocol was based on work published by Ravanat et al. [31]. Briefly, the snap frozen tumour samples were thawed on ice, homogenized with 1 mL of lysis buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, 320 mM sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM desferroxamine, 1% Triton X-100, pH 7.5) and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min to isolate the nuclear pellet. The pellet was washed once in lysis buffer A and resuspended into 200 μL of buffer B (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1% w/v SDS, 5 mM EDTA-NA2, 0.15 mM desferroxamine, pH 8.0) using a plastic Kontes Pellet Pestle®. RNA was digested by adding 13.3 μl of a 50 U/mL RNase A and 100 U/mL RNase T solutions for 1 hr at 50°C. A proteinase K solution (13.3 μl; 5 mg/mL) in 10 mM Tris/1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 was added for protein digestion at the same incubation conditions. Prior to the DNA extraction, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min to remove any undigested tissue. DNA was precipitated with 0.3 mL of Buffer C (40 mM Tris-HCl, 7.6 M NaI, 20 mM EDTA-NA2, 0.3 mM desferroxamine, pH 8.0) and 0.5 mL of 100% isopropanol. The precipitate was centrifuged at 10,000 g and washed 4 times with 70% ethanol. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 20 mM Na-acetate buffer with 0.1 mM desferroxamine, pH 5.2. Diluted DNA samples were digested with 5 U of nuclease P1 prepared in 20 mM Na-acetate buffer. The pH was adjusted to 8.5 with 1 M Tris-HCl buffer and the DNA hydrolyzed to nucleosides by incubation with 6 U of calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, PQ) for 1 hr at 37°C. The suspension was transferred to Microcon® YM-10 spin columns (Millipore, Mississauga, ON) and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 30 min, filter-sterilized and injected for HPLC analysis.

HPLC conditions

The HPLC system (200 series, Perkin Elmer, Woodbridge, ON) consisted of a 0.2 μm mobile phase filter, a vacuum degasser, an isocratic HPLC pump set at 1.0 mL/min, an autosampler with a 200 μL sample loop and a Spherisorb® ODS-2 guard column (10 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, Waters, Mississauga, ON), and 2 Spherisorb® ODS-2 analytical columns (150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, Waters, Mississauga, ON) connected in series. The mobile phase consisted of 7.5% methanol, and 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5.5, filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (Millipore, Mississauga, ON). The 8-oxo-dG was detected with an electrochemical detector (Coulochem II 5200A, ESA, Chelmsford, MA) with a PEEK-filter protected analytical cell (5010, ESA; 10nA; screen electrode +100 mV; analytic electrode, +400 mV). The dG was detected with a UV detector (200 series, Perkin Elmer, Woodbridge, ON) set at 280 nm. Data were recorded using a NCI 902 dual detector interface and analyzed with Totalchrom Workstation Ver 6.3.1 software (Perkin Elmer, Woodbridge, ON). Levels of 8-oxo-dG and dG in samples were quantified via calibration curves with authentic standards.

Statistical analysis

For non-parametric data sets, such as those for metastases, the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons was performed on experiments with 3 or more groups and the Mann-Whitney test was performed on experiments with 2 groups. For parametric data sets with equal variances, such as those for tumour burden, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was performed on experiments with 3 or more groups and Student's t-test was performed on experiments with 2 groups. Mixed modelling was used to correct for inter-experimental variability in repeat TBARS assays.

Results

Lowering of tumour oxygenation with in vivo acute hypoxia gassing regime

The hypoxia marker EF5 was used to identify hypoxic areas in the MMTV-PyMT tumours (Figure 1A). Although the overall values of EF5 positive areas were relatively low, the total median EF5 positive area was significantly greater in tumours from mice exposed to 6 weeks of AH than AC gassing (Figure 1B; P < 0.05). Interestingly, inter-tumour variability in EF5 positive areas of individual animals was substantial, varying from 0.3% to 8.1% per mouse.
Figure 1

Levels of EF5 following 4 hours of in vivo acute hypoxia exposure. (A) An H+E stained tumour section from a PyMT mouse tumour with EF5 positive hypoxic areas stained in brown, necrotic tumour core is marked with an asterix. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Quantification of total EF5 positive staining area (%) in 31 tumours from 11 PyMT mice exposed to AC or AH conditions for 4 hours showed significantly greater median levels of hypoxia in mice exposed to AH than in mice exposed to AC (P < 0.05; *).

Oxidative stress and genomic instability in hypoxia- and MDA-treated mice

To determine the extent of oxidative stress induced by the gassing, plasma was obtained from transgenic and WT mice following the 6-week gassing regime. Mean plasma TBARS levels were greater in mice exposed to AH than in animals exposed to AC in 3 separate experiments, a difference that was shown to be significant with mixed modelling analysis (P < 0.0005). TBARS levels in mice drinking MDA-supplemented water were also significantly increased relative to both gassing groups (Table 1). Oxidative stress was also assessed by HPLC quantification of 8-oxo-dG lesions. Tumour samples from mice exposed to AH showed an increasing difference relative to AC mice over the 1 day, 5 day and 6 week exposures. The difference was significant by the 6 week time point (P < 0.05). MDA consumption increased tumour 8-oxo-dG lesions significantly at all time points (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Tumour 8-oxo-dG lesion levels following oxidative stresses. Mutagenic 8-oxo-dG lesions quantified at 1 day time point resulted in significant changes between MDA and AH and MDA and C (P < 0.001; ***) groups. Following 6 weeks of treatment the lesion levels were significantly increased in AH mice relative to AC mice (P < 0.05; *). Legends: MDA = malondialdehyde; AH = acute hypoxia; C = pooled controls from air control and PBS injected groups; 2-NP = positive control, 2-nitropropane; CC = cage control. Bars: mean with SEM. Number of tumours used for each group is indicated below the bars.

Table 1

TBARS plasma lipid peroxidation levels following oxidative stresses

 

Absorbance values (Arbitrary scale)

 

Air Control (AC)

Acute Hypoxia (AH)

Ratio (AH/AC)

MDA treatment

Expt 1 (n = 4–5)

0.080+/-0.005

0.101+/-0.007

1.27

0.519+/-0.066

Expt 2 (n = 7)

0.132+/-0.006

0.152+/-0.008

1.16

 

Expt 3 (n = 8–9)

0.048+/-0.002

0.060+/-0.004

1.24

 

Lipid peroxidation assessed by TBARS assay in plasma of transgenic mice treated with 6 weeks of acute hypoxia (AH) showed a significantly increased plasma absorbance levels relative to air control (AC) conditions in 3 repeat assays (mixed modelling analysis on combined data; P < 0.0005). Lipid peroxidation in plasma of positive control WT animals drinking MDA-supplemented acidified water for 6 weeks was significantly increased relative to both AH – (P < 0.01) and AC – (P < 0.001) exposed mice. Mean+/- SEM are shown for each experimental group.

Effects of acute hypoxia and MDA on primary and metastatic tumour progression

To address the question on how MDA or hypoxia would affect tumour progression of the MMTV-PyMT model, primary and metastatic tumour burdens were quantified in mice exposed to these conditions. MDA consumption, which resulted in a significant increase in 8-oxo-dG lesion levels, did not significantly alter any of the tumour progression parameters examined (Figures 3A–C). The primary tumour burden following AH exposure also remained unaffected relative to AC mice, although both AC and AH groups had significantly reduced primary tumour burdens relative to unexposed CC mice (Figure 3A). The numbers of macroscopic metastases showed the same range and no significant differences between the AC, AH and CC groups (Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Primary and metastatic tumour progression in MDA- and AH – exposed mice. (A) CC mice developed significantly larger primary tumours than mice exposed to AH (P < 0.001; ***) or AC conditions (P < 0.01; **). Six-week exposure to MDA did not affect the size of endpoint tumour burden relative to MDA-CC. (B) MDA or AH exposure during primary tumour development did not increase macroscopic lung metastases relative to their respective controls. (C) A trend towards an increased number of micrometastases was seen following MDA consumption. Micrometastases were not assessed in the hypoxia experiment due to a large number of macroscopic metastases. Abbreviations: MDA = malondialdehyde (n = 28) and MDA-CC = cage controls for MDA group (n = 30), 81 days; AH = acute hypoxia (n = 24), AC = air control (n = 26) and CC = cage controls for AH group (n = 20), 88 days. Bars: mean with SEM (A), medians (B and C). Number of animals used for each group is indicated in parentheses.

Total antioxidant capacity and APE/Ref-1 levels in hypoxia treated mice

To determine whether altered antioxidant levels in AH exposed mice may have been the underlying reason for the small increase in 8-oxo-dG lesions, the total antioxidant capacity of plasma from the AC and AH mice was assessed. Plasma from AH-exposed mice showed a trend of reduced antioxidant reductive capacity relative to plasma from AC mice (Figure 4A; P = 0.0667). Assessment of the relationship between plasma antioxidant capacity and tumour 8-oxo-dG lesions revealed a significant correlation between these parameters in the AC group (Figure 4B; r2 = 0.9094, P < 0.05), which did not occur with the hypoxia exposure.
Figure 4

Total plasma antioxidant capacity and tumour APE/Ref-1 expression. (A) Plasma samples from mice exposed to AH showed a trend of reduced levels of total antioxidant reductive capacity relative to AC mice. (B) Scatter plot of total antioxidant reductive capacity and 8-oxo-dG lesions in matching samples showed a significant positive correlation for AC mice (r2 = 0.9094; P < 0.05), which was absent in the AH samples (r2 = 0.008383; P = 0.8836). (C) BER protein, APE/Ref-1 was expressed predominantly in the connective tissue of the MMTV-PyMT tumours. (D) Total positive staining area for APE/Ref-1 in tumour tissue (excluding connective tissue) did not differ in tissues from acute hypoxia and air control exposed mice. Bars: median with interquartile range. Scale bar: 50 μm.

APE/Ref-1 is a multifunctional protein that acts as an endonuclease in the BER pathway and controls the activity of transcription factors, such as AP-1 and HIF-1α by regulating their state of oxidation. Cellular localization of APE/Ref-1 is generally found to be ubiquitous, but varying between nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments [32]. APE/Ref-1 staining in the MMTV-PyMT tumours was primarily localized to the connective tissue (Figure 4C). In tumour cells, the staining levels were generally low and primarily cytoplasmic and were not found to differ between the two treatment groups. Image analysis was conducted in tumour tissues only and in tumour with connective tissue included, but neither analysis showed a difference between AH- and AC-exposed mice (Figure 4D).

Effects of hypoxia on TAMs and vasculature

TAMs have been previously reported to be involved in tumour progression in the MMTV-PyMT model and to accumulate in hypoxic areas [21, 25, 26]. To quantify TAM content, tumour samples were stained with the MØ marker F4/80. Interestingly, the F4/80 positive staining was seen evenly throughout the tumours in contrast to the highly localized staining pattern commonly seen with extrinsic hypoxia markers such as EF5 (cf. Figures 1A and 5A). The overall levels of F4/80 were significantly increased in samples from hypoxia-relative to air-exposed mice (Figure 5B; P < 0.05). TAMs have been reported to have pro-angiogenic effects [33, 34] and therefore tumour vasculature was quantified through CD31 staining (Figure 5C). Similarly to our previous in vivo acute hypoxia study in a cervical tumour model the total area of CD31 positive staining was significantly reduced following AH exposure despite the increase in TAMs [35] (Figure 5D; P < 0.01).
Figure 5

Quantification of TAM and vascular markers. (A) Representative cytoplasmic expression of MØ marker F4/80 in a MMTV-PyMT tumour section. (B) Total positive staining area of F4/80 was significantly higher in AH than AC treated animals (P < 0.05; *). (C) Representative staining pattern of vascular marker CD31 in MMTV-PyMT tumours. (D) Total CD31 positive area was significantly reduced following hypoxia exposure (P < 0.01; **). AH = acute hypoxia, AC = air control. Bars: mean with SEM. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Discussion

Hypoxia has been reported to enhance metastatic tumour progression and to be associated with oxidative stress, genomic instability and TAMs [21, 3638]. We have previously shown metastasis-promoting effects of in vivo acute hypoxia in a murine fibrosarcoma and a human orthotopic cervical model [4, 35] and in the current study, we examined the relationships between the above parameters in an in vivo transgenic breast cancer model with high metastatic potential.

In human breast cancer, the mutagenic end product of lipid peroxidation, MDA, is commonly used as a marker for oxidative stress [19, 39], which in turn has been associated with induction of epithelial cell invasiveness and metastatic phenotype [40, 41]. In our study, TBARS assay of plasma for lipid peroxidation products from mice exposed to AH shows a significant increase relative to AC mice. The increased level of oxidative stress following AH exposure was further supported by the trend of reduced total antioxidant capacity in the plasma of AH-exposed mice. The effects of increased oxidative stress in the hypoxia-exposed (and in the MDA-fed) animals were also quantified through HPLC analysis of 8-oxo-dG lesions. These lesions are known to induce GC→TA transversions [18] and have been previously used as a measure of oxidative stress induced by hypoxia and as a marker of oxidative stress in breast cancer patients [38, 42]. Our HPLC analyses of breast tumour tissue were consistent with the results of the TBARS and antioxidant assays and showed greater numbers of 8-oxo-dG lesions following AH exposure and MDA consumption. We chose to quantify 8-oxo-dG lesions based on their ROS-dependent formation and their ability to induce mutations [18, 43]. Therefore, one of our underlying assumptions was that increased 8-oxo-dG lesion levels would provide a general indication of potential DNA lesions and hence mutagenic events associated with oxic stress. An alternate approach might have been to quantify specific, tumourigenesis-modifying mutations such as base pair mutations, gene amplifications, chromosomal translocations or aneuploidy directly from tumour biopsies, which would allow comparison of mutation levels with tumourigenesis data on an individual animal basis. However, identifying which are the critical lesions is problematic and the relevant lesions might be different in different tumours in the same animal, complicating the analysis.

Together, our results provide in vivo evidence that the cyclic hypoxia-breathing regime causes significant oxidative stress and might be expected to induce genomic instability and tumour progression. However, despite the increase in oxidative stress we observed little change in tumour progression, although both gassing exposures did significantly reduce primary tumour burdens relative to cage control mice. This is likely due to various extra stressors in the gassed mice such as handling, temporary (4 hr) absence of food and water and exposure to foreign cage mates, conditions that have all been reported to have the potential to modify tumour progression [4446]. Some of the suggested underlying mechanisms include stressor-mediated changes in various immune cell and cytokine levels, accelerated telomere shortening and apoptosis induction [4648].

Although the increases in hypoxia-induced lipid peroxidation and 8-oxo-dG lesions were statistically significant, our data suggests that these changes may not have been large enough to induce a biological impact. Therefore, we treated animals with MDA, which induced greater increases in 8-oxo-dG lesions than those seen with the AH exposure, and assessed the animals for primary and metastatic tumour progression. Despite the significant increase in 8-oxo-dG lesions in MDA-fed mice, again no respective changes in tumour progression were observed. These findings suggest that increases in oxidative stress and 8-oxo-dG lesions do not play a significant role in the tumour progression of the MMTV-PyMT model. Similar conclusions have also been reported from experiments with the MMTV-PyMT model where the lack of a significant difference in point mutations between normal, malignant and metastatic tissues and the lack of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) above background levels was attributed to the strong transforming ability of the middle T oncogene [49, 50]. This is consistent with the findings that several pathological conditions with increased 8-oxo-dG levels in tissue can occur without tumour incidence and studies that have reported no relationship between DNA adduct levels or even megabase deletions and cancer incidence [51, 52]. Furthermore, the mouse model deficient in OGG1, a glycosylase responsible for removal of 8-oxo-dG lesions, fails to demonstrate a significant effect on tumourigenesis despite significantly elevated 8-oxo-dG lesions [53, 54]. A similar observation has been reported for another glycosylase, MYH, and only when the two mutants are combined or another stressor, such as UV exposure, is introduced is an increase in tumour incidence observed [55, 56]. Therefore, it is possible that similar compensatory mechanisms could have prevented the hypoxia exposures from translating into changes in tumour progression and that different results could be seen if the gassings were imposed on one of the above-mentioned repair-deficient models. Overall, our findings are consistent with the idea that any effect of oxidative stress on tumour progression in the MMTV-PyMT model would require stress levels, which are not inducible by the degrees of cyclic hypoxia or MDA exposures used in this study, and emphasize the importance of the lesion type, location and context in addition to their number.

The 6-week acute hypoxia exposure also resulted in a significant increase in TAMs as detected by the F4/80 MØ marker. TAMs are thought to represent a distinct MØ population, for which phenotypic characterization remains incomplete. They differ in their activity from the MØ populations found in normal tissues and their differentiation depends on the cytokines expressed in the host tumour [57]. Previous work has implicated a multitude of roles for TAMs in tumour progression, including angiogenesis and stimulation of cellular metastasis and survival [23, 58]. Our data show in vivo evidence of hypoxia-mediated TAM accumulation to tumours, independent of angiogenesis. Although discordances between hypoxia and stimulation of angiogenesis have been reported previously, the absence of increased angiogenesis with increasing TAM content seems to be in contrast to previous reports [26, 59]. This dissimilarity may be due to the different markers used for angiogenic quantification or varying angiogenic potentials between hypoxia- and CSF-1-stimulated TAMs. Although the hypoxia-mediated increase in F4/80 positive MØs did not translate into increased tumour burden or lung metastases in the MMTV-PyMT model, the lack of specific TAM co-localization to hypoxic areas is consistent with previous observations in the MMTV-PyMT model where no co-localization of TAMs to hypoxic areas, as identified through pimonidazole staining, was observed [34]. In future work, the AH gassing exposure could be shifted from the period of primary tumour growth to metastasis formation stage since the role of MØ in tumour progression has been shown to occur at the invasion stage of tumour cells where MØ physically interact with cells invading into the vasculature [26].

Although an in vivo study examining the effects of whole body exposure to hypoxia on leukaemia progression reported no significant differences in blood cell counts or cellular proliferation or apoptosis rates of the control mice following daily 18 hour exposure to ~10% oxygen during 30 days, significantly increased levels of the anti-angiogenic factor, thrombospondin-1, have been observed in hypoxia-exposed endothelial cells [60, 61]. Therefore, one potential limitation of the current model is that the whole animal in addition to the tumour was exposed to cycling hypoxia, which may induce adaptive physiological responses that might be able to neutralize or mask changes occurring at the tumour level.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated increased 8-oxo-dG DNA lesions following exposure to acute cyclic hypoxia (AH), supporting the concept that tumour hypoxia could have mutagenic potential. However, neither this exposure or treatment with MDA, which caused the greater increase in 8-oxo-dG DNA lesions, affected tumour progression, raising doubts concerning the importance of oxidative stress in tumour progression of the MMTV-PyMT model. In this context, it is of interest that we have obtained similar results in the MMTV-Neu mammary tumour model (Kalliomäki, 2008). Interestingly we also observed that AH exposure increased TAM content of the PyMT tumours. This increase was not associated with hypoxic areas in the tumours nor did it relate to angiogenesis, one of the putative roles of TAMs. Our current work suggests that this response may be dependent on changes associated with the MMTV-PyMT oncogene since similar hypoxia exposure did not significantly increase the F4/80+ MØ content of the MMTV-Neu tumours (Kalliomäki, 2008).

Abbreviations

2-NP: 

2-nitropropane, 8-oxo-dG: 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine

APE/Ref-1: 

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1/redox effector factor-1

BER: 

Base excision repair

BHT: 

Butylated hydroxytoluene

CAIX: 

Carbonic anhydrase IX

CXCR4: 

Chemokine receptor 4

EF5: 

2-(2-nitro-1-H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl) acetamide

GLUT-1: 

Glucose transporter 1

HIF-1α: 

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α

HPLC-EC: 

High performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

Ku70: 

ATP-dependent DNA helicase 2 subunit 1

MDA: 

Malondialdehyde

MIF: 

Macrophage inhibitory factor

Mlh1: 

mutL homolog 1

MMTV: 

Mouse mammary tumour virus

MØ: 

Macrophage

MSH2/6: 

MutS homolog 2/6

O/N: 

Overnight

PMS2: 

PMS2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2

PyMT: 

Polyoma middle T

RAD51: 

DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1

ROS/RNS: 

Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species

R/T: 

Room temperature

TAM: 

Tumour-associated macrophage

TBARS: 

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

Xrcc4: 

X-ray repair cross complementing protein 4.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Melania Pintilie for assistance with the statistical analyses, Dr. Geoffrey Wood and Patrick Subarsky for helpful discussions and Robert Kuba for excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied Molecular Oncology Division, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital
(2)
Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto
(3)
Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
(4)
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto

References

  1. Milosevic M, Fyles A, Hedley D, Hill R: The human tumor microenvironment: Invasive (needle) measurement of oxygen and interstitial fluid pressure. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004, 14 (3): 249-258. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dales JP, Garcia S, Meunier-Carpentier S, Andrac-Meyer L, Haddad O, Lavaut MN, Allasia C, Bonnier P, Charpin C: Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1alpha predicts early relapse in breast cancer: retrospective study in a series of 745 patients. Int J Cancer. 2005, 116 (5): 734-739. 10.1002/ijc.20984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tomes L, Emberley E, Niu Y, Troup S, Pastorek J, Strange K, Harris A, Watson PH: Necrosis and hypoxia in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 81 (1): 61-69. 10.1023/A:1025476722493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns RA, Kalliomaki T, Hill RP: Acute (cyclic) hypoxia enhances spontaneous metastasis of KHT murine tumors. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (24): 8903-8908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rofstad EK, Galappathi K, Mathiesen B, Ruud EB: Fluctuating and diffusion-limited hypoxia in hypoxia-induced metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (7): 1971-1978. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Reynolds TY, Rockwell S, Glazer PM: Genetic instability induced by the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 1996, 56 (24): 5754-5757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rofstad EK, Johnsen NM, Lyng H: Hypoxia-induced tetraploidisation of a diploid human melanoma cell line in vitro. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1996, 27: S136-9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Young SD, Marshall RS, Hill RP: Hypoxia induces DNA overreplication and enhances metastatic potential of murine tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988, 85 (24): 9533-9537. 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9533.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Coquelle A, Toledo F, Stern S, Bieth A, Debatisse M: A new role for hypoxia in tumor progression: induction of fragile site triggering genomic rearrangements and formation of complex DMs and HSRs. Mol Cell. 1998, 2 (2): 259-265. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80137-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang LE, Bindra RS, Glazer PM, Harris AL: Hypoxia-induced genetic instability--a calculated mechanism underlying tumor progression. J Mol Med. 2007, 85 (2): 139-148. 10.1007/s00109-006-0133-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bindra RS, Schaffer PJ, Meng A, Woo J, Maseide K, Roth ME, Lizardi P, Hedley DW, Bristow RG, Glazer PM: Alterations in DNA repair gene expression under hypoxia: elucidating the mechanisms of hypoxia-induced genetic instability. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, 1059: 184-195. 10.1196/annals.1339.049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng AX, Jalali F, Cuddihy A, Chan N, Bindra RS, Glazer PM, Bristow RG: Hypoxia down-regulates DNA double strand break repair gene expression in prostate cancer cells. Radiother Oncol. 2005, 76 (2): 168-176. 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bristow RG, Hill RP: Hypoxia and metabolism. Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8 (3): 180-192. 10.1038/nrc2344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson AL, Loeb LA: The contribution of endogenous sources of DNA damage to the multiple mutations in cancer. Mutat Res. 2001, 477 (1-2): 7-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukumura D, Kashiwagi S, Jain RK: The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6 (7): 521-534. 10.1038/nrc1910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li C, Jackson RM: Reactive species mechanisms of cellular hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002, 282 (2): C227-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown NS, Bicknell R: Hypoxia and oxidative stress in breast cancer. Oxidative stress: its effects on the growth, metastatic potential and response to therapy of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3 (5): 323-7. Epub 2001 Jul 23.. 10.1186/bcr315.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Malins DC, Polissar NL, Ostrander GK, Vinson MA: Single 8-oxo-guanine and 8-oxo-adenine lesions induce marked changes in the backbone structure of a 25-base DNA strand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (23): 12442-12445. 10.1073/pnas.230438797.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. VanderVeen LA, Hashim MF, Shyr Y, Marnett LJ: Induction of frameshift and base pair substitution mutations by the major DNA adduct of the endogenous carcinogen malondialdehyde. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (24): 14247-14252. 10.1073/pnas.2332176100.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. de Zwart LL, Meerman JH, Commandeur JN, Vermeulen NP: Biomarkers of free radical damage applications in experimental animals and in humans. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999, 26 (1-2): 202-226. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00196-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murdoch C, Giannoudis A, Lewis CE: Mechanisms regulating the recruitment of macrophages into hypoxic areas of tumors and other ischemic tissues. Blood. 2004, 104 (8): 2224-2234. 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim HW, Murakami A, Williams MV, Ohigashi H: Mutagenicity of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as detected by co-culture of activated inflammatory leukocytes and AS52 cells. Carcinogenesis. 2003, 24 (2): 235-241. 10.1093/carcin/24.2.235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Murdoch C, Muthana M, Lewis CE: Hypoxia regulates macrophage functions in inflammation. J Immunol. 2005, 175 (10): 6257-6263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bingle L, Brown NJ, Lewis CE: The role of tumour-associated macrophages in tumour progression: implications for new anticancer therapies. J Pathol. 2002, 196 (3): 254-265. 10.1002/path.1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin EY, Nguyen AV, Russell RG, Pollard JW: Colony-stimulating factor 1 promotes progression of mammary tumors to malignancy. J Exp Med. 2001, 193 (6): 727-740. 10.1084/jem.193.6.727.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wyckoff JB, Wang Y, Lin EY, Li JF, Goswami S, Stanley ER, Segall JE, Pollard JW, Condeelis J: Direct visualization of macrophage-assisted tumor cell intravasation in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (6): 2649-2656. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Guy CT, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ: Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease. Mol Cell Biol. 1992, 12 (3): 954-961.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Siu GM, Draper HH, Valli VE: Oral toxicity of malonaldehyde: a 90-day study on mice. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1983, 11 (1): 105-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cabelof DC, Raffoul JJ, Yanamadala S, Guo Z, Heydari AR: Induction of DNA polymerase beta-dependent base excision repair in response to oxidative stress in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2002, 23 (9): 1419-1425. 10.1093/carcin/23.9.1419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedley D, Chow S: Flow cytometric measurement of lipid peroxidation in vital cells using parinaric acid. Cytometry. 1992, 13 (7): 686-692. 10.1002/cyto.990130704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ravanat JL, Douki T, Duez P, Gremaud E, Herbert K, Hofer T, Lasserre L, Saint-Pierre C, Favier A, Cadet J: Cellular background level of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine: an isotope based method to evaluate artefactual oxidation of DNA during its extraction and subsequent work-up. Carcinogenesis. 2002, 23 (11): 1911-1918. 10.1093/carcin/23.11.1911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Evans AR, Limp-Foster M, Kelley MR: Going APE over ref-1. Mutat Res. 2000, 461 (2): 83-108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Crowther M, Brown NJ, Bishop ET, Lewis CE: Microenvironmental influence on macrophage regulation of angiogenesis in wounds and malignant tumors. J Leukoc Biol. 2001, 70 (4): 478-490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin EY, Li JF, Gnatovskiy L, Deng Y, Zhu L, Grzesik DA, Qian H, Xue XN, Pollard JW: Macrophages regulate the angiogenic switch in a mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (23): 11238-11246. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cairns RA, Hill RP: Acute hypoxia enhances spontaneous lymph node metastasis in an orthotopic murine model of human cervical carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (6): 2054-2061. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Subarsky P, Hill RP: The hypoxic tumour microenvironment and metastatic progression. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003, 20 (3): 237-250. 10.1023/A:1022939318102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Liao D, Corle C, Seagroves TN, Johnson RS: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha is a key regulator of metastasis in a transgenic model of cancer initiation and progression. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (2): 563-572. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moller P, Loft S, Lundby C, Olsen NV: Acute hypoxia and hypoxic exercise induce DNA strand breaks and oxidative DNA damage in humans. Faseb J. 2001, 15 (7): 1181-1186. 10.1096/fj.00-0703com.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ray G, Batra S, Shukla NK, Deo S, Raina V, Ashok S, Husain SA: Lipid peroxidation, free radical production and antioxidant status in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000, 59 (2): 163-170. 10.1023/A:1006357330486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mori K, Shibanuma M, Nose K: Invasive Potential Induced under Long-Term Oxidative Stress in Mammary Epithelial Cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (20): 7464-7472. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Malins DC, Polissar NL, Gunselman SJ: Progression of human breast cancers to the metastatic state is linked to hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (6): 2557-2563. 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2557.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Matsui A, Ikeda T, Enomoto K, Hosoda K, Nakashima H, Omae K, Watanabe M, Hibi T, Kitajima M: Increased formation of oxidative DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, in human breast cancer tissue and its relationship to GSTP1 and COMT genotypes. Cancer Lett. 2000, 151 (1): 87-95. 10.1016/S0304-3835(99)00424-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Cadet J, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Ravanat JL: Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement and biochemical features. Mutat Res. 2003, 531 (1-2): 5-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kerr LR, Wilkinson DA, Emerman JT, Weinberg J: Interactive effects of psychosocial stressors and gender on mouse mammary tumor growth. Physiol Behav. 1999, 66 (2): 277-284. 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00296-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pape-Ansorge KA, Grande JP, Christensen TA, Maihle NJ, Cleary MP: Effect of moderate caloric restriction and/or weight cycling on mammary tumor incidence and latency in MMTV-Neu female mice. Nutr Cancer. 2002, 44 (2): 162-168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thaker PH, Han LY, Kamat AA, Arevalo JM, Takahashi R, Lu C, Jennings NB, Armaiz-Pena G, Bankson JA, Ravoori M, Merritt WM, Lin YG, Mangala LS, Kim TJ, Coleman RL, Landen CN, Li Y, Felix E, Sanguino AM, Newman RA, Lloyd M, Gershenson DM, Kundra V, Lopez-Berestein G, Lutgendorf SK, Cole SW, Sood AK: Chronic stress promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma. Nat Med. 2006, 12 (8): 939-944. 10.1038/nm1447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, Morrow JD, Cawthon RM: From the Cover: Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. PNAS. 2004, 101 (49): 17312-17315. 10.1073/pnas.0407162101.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson HJ, Zhu Z, Jiang W: Identification of the apoptosis activation cascade induced in mammary carcinomas by energy restriction. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (4): 1541-1545. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jakubczak JL, Merlino G, French JE, Muller WJ, Paul B, Adhya S, Garges S: Analysis of genetic instability during mammary tumor progression using a novel selection-based assay for in vivo mutations in a bacteriophage lambda transgene target. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (17): 9073-9078. 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9073.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Ritland SR, Rowse GJ, Chang Y, Gendler SJ: Loss of heterozygosity analysis in primary mammary tumors and lung metastases of MMTV-MTAg and MMTV-neu transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1997, 57 (16): 3520-3525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagao M, Ochiai M, Okochi E, Ushijima T, Sugimura T: LacI transgenic animal study: relationships among DNA-adduct levels, mutant frequencies and cancer incidences. Mutat Res. 2001, 477 (1-2): 119-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nobrega MA, Zhu Y, Plajzer-Frick I, Afzal V, Rubin EM: Megabase deletions of gene deserts result in viable mice. Nature. 2004, 431 (7011): 988-993. 10.1038/nature03022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Klungland A, Rosewell I, Hollenbach S, Larsen E, Daly G, Epe B, Seeberg E, Lindahl T, Barnes DE: Accumulation of premutagenic DNA lesions in mice defective in removal of oxidative base damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96 (23): 13300-13305. 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13300.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Minowa O, Arai T, Hirano M, Monden Y, Nakai S, Fukuda M, Itoh M, Takano H, Hippou Y, Aburatani H, Masumura K, Nohmi T, Nishimura S, Noda T: Mmh/Ogg1 gene inactivation results in accumulation of 8-hydroxyguanine in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (8): 4156-4161. 10.1073/pnas.050404497.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Xie Y, Yang H, Cunanan C, Okamoto K, Shibata D, Pan J, Barnes DE, Lindahl T, McIlhatton M, Fishel R, Miller JH: Deficiencies in mouse Myh and Ogg1 result in tumor predisposition and G to T mutations in codon 12 of the K-ras oncogene in lung tumors. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (9): 3096-3102. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kunisada M, Sakumi K, Tominaga Y, Budiyanto A, Ueda M, Ichihashi M, Nakabeppu Y, Nishigori C: 8-Oxoguanine formation induced by chronic UVB exposure makes Ogg1 knockout mice susceptible to skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (14): 6006-6010. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sica A, Schioppa T, Mantovani A, Allavena P: Tumour-associated macrophages are a distinct M2 polarised population promoting tumour progression: potential targets of anti-cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42 (6): 717-727. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Condeelis J, Pollard JW: Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006, 124 (2): 263-266. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Moeller BJ, Cao Y, Vujaskovic Z, Li CY, Haroon ZA, Dewhirst MW: The relationship between hypoxia and angiogenesis. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004, 14 (3): 215-221. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu W, Guo M, Xu YB, Li D, Zhou ZN, Wu YL, Chen Z, Kogan SC, Chen GQ: Induction of tumor arrest and differentiation with prolonged survival by intermittent hypoxia in a mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006, 107 (2): 698-707. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Phelan MW, Forman LW, Perrine SP, Faller DV: Hypoxia increases thrombospondin-1 transcript and protein in cultured endothelial cells. J Lab Clin Med. 1998, 132 (6): 519-529. 10.1016/S0022-2143(98)90131-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/151/prepub

Copyright

© Kalliomäki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement