Skip to main content
Download PDF

Modulation of SIRT3 expression through CDK4/6 enhances the anti-cancer effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

BMC Cancer volume 20, Article number: 332 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The only drug currently approved for clinical use in the treatment of advanced HCC is sorafenib. However, many patients with HCC show reduced sensitivity to sorafenib during treatment. SIRT3, a member of the mammalian sirtuin family, is a tumor suppressor in certain tumor types. However, only few studies have investigated the effects of SIRT3 on tumor prognosis and sorafenib sensitivity in patients with HCC. Here, we aimed to investigate the correlation between SIRT3 expression and glucose metabolism and proliferation in HCC and discover effective compounds that increase endogenous SIRT3 modulation effect of sorafenib.

Methods

To determine the correlation between SIRT3 and glucose related proteins, immunostaining was performed with liver cancer tissue using various antibodies. To investigate whether the expression of SIRT3 in HCC is related to the resistance to sorafenib, we treated sorafenib after the modulation of SIRT3 levels in HCC cell lines (overexpression in Huh7, knockdown in HepG2). We also employed PD0332991 to modulate the SIRT3 expression in HCC cell and conducted functional assays.

Results

SIRT3 expression was downregulated in high glycolytic and proliferative HCC cells of human patients, xenograft model and HCC cell lines. Moreover, SIRT3 expression was downregulated after sorafenib treatment, resulting in reduced drug sensitivity in HCC cell lines. To enhance the anti-tumor effect of sorafenib, we employed PD0332991 (CDK4/6-Rb inhibitor) based on the correlation between SIRT3 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein in HCC. Notably, combined treatment with sorafenib and PD0332991 showed an enhancement of the anti-tumor effect in HCC cells.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the modulation of SIRT3 by CDK4/6 inhibition might be useful for HCC therapy together with sorafenib, which, unfortunately, has limited efficacy and whose use is often associated with drug resistance.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Patients with early-stage HCC are asymptomatic; hence, HCC is usually detected at intermediate or advanced stages, in which patients cannot receive curative treatments such as ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation [2]. Although surgical treatment has improved the disease outcome, the risk of recurrence remains substantial even for early HCC. In patients with advanced HCC, sorafenib (Nexavar), an orally active multikinase inhibitor, has been used as a first-line chemotherapeutic agent [3]. Despite extending the median survival by 3–5 months, the high resistance rate and serious adverse side effects have significantly limited the benefits of sorafenib therapy [4,5,6]. Therefore, there is an increasing need for a strategy to enhance the effects of sorafenib anti-cancer activity.

Sirtuins (SIRT1–7) have emerged as important regulators of tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell survival, metabolism, and angiogenesis [7,8,9]. SIRT3, the best characterized mitochondrial sirtuin, deacetylates and activates several enzymes involved in cellular redox balance and defense against oxidative damage [10,11,12]. Several reports suggest that SIRT3 has a dual role in cancer [13,14,15]. SIRT3 functions as an oncogene in oral cancer and melanoma by maintaining ROS levels under a certain threshold to prevent apoptosis and promote cell proliferation [16, 17]. In contrast, SIRT3 has been identified as a tumor suppressor in HCC [18, 19], breast cancer [20], ovarian cancer [21], and leukemia [22]. Further, it has been reported that SIRT3 plays a role in metabolic reprogramming (Warburg) and in triggering cell death under stress conditions [23, 24]. Indeed, high SIRT3 expression is correlated with favorable outcomes and an increase in the overall survival rate of patients with HCC [25]. In this regard, regulation of SIRT3 expression might be a novel strategy to investigate more personalized therapies against cancers. In addition, SIRT3 expression levels affect sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in HCC [26].

In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between SIRT3 expression and glucose metabolism and proliferation in HCC. In addition, because a few compounds have been explored to modulate SIRT3 activity [27, 28], we also attempted to identify effective compounds that increase the endogenous SIRT3 modulation mediated by the anti-cancer effect of sorafenib.

Methods

Human HCC samples

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Yonsei University Health System Severance Hospital (Seoul, South Korea), and the study was conducted using the current guidelines for ethical research (Yonsei IRB number: 4–2015-0904). The selection of patients was performed as described previously [29].

Chemicals

PD0332991 was purchased from TOCRIS Bioscience (Bristol, UK) and sorafenib was purchased from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA). PD0332991 and sorafenib were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a concentration of 10 mM. All reagents were stored at − 80 °C.

Cell lines and cell culture

The human HCC cell lines HepG2, Hep3B, skHep1, and Huh7 were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank. HepG2 was cultured in RPMI, and Hep3B, skHep1, and Huh7 were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone) and 1% penicillin streptomycin. Cells were maintained in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. For the formation of three-dimensional spheroids, Costar® Ultra-Low attachment multiple-well plates (MerkKGaA → Corning, Darmstadt, Germany) were used. HCC cells were plated at 5000 cells/well and centrifuged at 179×g for 1 min. Spheroids were observed 1–2 days after plating. Hep3B, skHep1, and Huh7 cell lines were plated and incubated for 24 h before transfection. Lipofectamine or RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to perform siRNA transfection following the manufacturer’s instructions. The plasmids for hSIRT3 (sc-61,555-SH) or scramble shRNA (sc-108,060) were cotransfected into HepG2 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, 12,566,014). After 72 h of incubation, the cells were treated with puromycin (2 μg/mL) to generate stable cell line clones.

Cell proliferation assay and glucose measurement

WST-1 colorimetric assays (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for cell viability were performed 48 h after treatment according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Huh7 cells were placed in 96-well plates and being transfected with MOCK or pcDNA-SIRT3 plasmid. After 48 h of treatment, the glucose uptake was determined using Glucose Assay (Promega, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Absorbances at 440 nm and 640 nm were measured using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, CA, USA).

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA quality was assessed by Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer using the RNA 6000 Nano Chip (Agilent Technologies, Amstelveen, The Netherlands), and RNA quantification was performed using ND-2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Inc., DE, USA). For control and test RNA samples, library was constructed using QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen, Inc., Austria) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 500 ng total RNA was prepared for each sample, an oligo-dT primer containing an Illumina-compatible sequence at its 5′ end was hybridized to the RNA, and reverse transcription was performed. After degradation of the RNA template, second strand synthesis was initiated by a random primer containing an Illumina-compatible linker sequence at its 5′ end. The double-stranded library was purified using magnetic beads to remove all reaction components. The library was amplified to add the complete adapter sequences required for cluster generation. The amplified library was purified, and high-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina, Inc., USA).

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) and cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Quantitative RT-PCR was conducted on C1000 a→ a C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) using SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Gene expression levels were normalized with beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) mRNA expression levels of corresponding cDNA samples. All PCR primers were purchased from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). The following primers were used: SIRT3 (Forward 5′-GAAACTACAAGCCCAACGTCA-3′, Reverse 5′-AAGGTTCCATGAGCTTCAACC-3′), RB1 (Forward 5′-GAAGCAACCCTCCTAAACCAC-3′, Reverse 5′-CTGCTTTTGCATTCGTGTTCG-3′), and B2M (Forward 5′-TTACTCACGTCATCCAGCAGA-3′, Reverse 5′-AGAAAGACCAGTCCTTGCTGA-3′).

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed as described previously [29]. The primary antibodies in the present study were: SIRT3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers MA, USA; clone C73E3; dilution 1:1000), CDK4 (DCS156, 1:1000), CDK6 (DCS83, 1:1000), Phospho-Rb (Ser807/811) (D20B12, 1:1000), Rb (4H1, 1:2000), PCNA (D3H8P, 1:2000), GLUT1 (1:2000) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), and Ki67 (Santa Cruz, Dallas TX, USA; MIB-1, 1:500). Western blotting experiments from biological replicates showed similar expression data, attesting to the reproducibility of the results. We used ChemiDoc XRS (Biorad), which enables direct digital visualization of chemiluminescent western blots for the image of signals accumulated in the chemiluminescence reaction. For band quantification, images were analyzed using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA).

Flow cytometry analysis

For quantification of apoptosis, double staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Pharmingen™, NJ, USA) and propidium iodide (PI). After HepG2 and Huh7 cells were collected after incubation with indicated compound, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and resuspended in 200 μL of binding buffer. Annexin V-FITC was added to the cells and incubated for 15 min in the dark at 25 °C. PI (10 mL) was added to the tube followed by 5 min of incubation at 4 °C in the dark. After incubation, the samples were analyzed by a flow cytometer using CELL Quest software (BD) and 1.0 × 105 events per sample were counted. The fraction of cell population in different quadrants was analyzed using quadrant statistics. Cells in the lower right quadrant (Annexin-V+/PI−) represented early apoptosis and those in the upper right quadrant (Annexin-V+/PI+) represented late apoptosis. For cell cycle analysis, after HepG2 and Huh7 cells were collected after incubation with indicated compound, the cells were incubated in 70% ethanol at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with PI at a concentration of 5 μg/mL and RNaseA at a concentration of 10 mg/mL for 30 min–4 h at 37 °C. The DNA contents were analyzed using FlowJo Software (Tree StarInc., Ashland, OR, USA).

Migration assay

Chemomigration assays were performed using 24-well plates with uncoated polycarbonate membrane inserts (BioCoat; BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). A total of 50,000 cells in medium containing 0.1% FBS and sorafenib, PD0332991, or combination of sorafenib and PD033291 were added onto the insert. The lower well was filled with a medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Twenty-four hours later, the cells that had migrated were fixed in 100% methanol and stained with 1.5% (w/v) toluidine blue in water. Images were recorded using an Olympus BX53 microscope with Olympus Cell Sens software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, GmbH, Jena, Germany).

Immunostaining

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) were performed as described previously [30]. After antigen retrieval, immunostaining was performed using various antibodies. The primary antibodies used were: SIRT3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers MA, USA; clone C73E3; dilution 1:500); Ki67 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; MIB-1; 1:500); GLUT1 (1:500), and Ki67 (SP6, 1:500) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Images were recorded using an Olympus BX53 microscope with Olympus Cell Sens software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, GmbH, Jena, Germany). The percentage of Ki67-positive cells and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb) was calculated by counting the number of cells with DAPI-stained nuclei.

The Cancer genome atlas (TCGA) data analysis

mRNA levels of TCGA liver HCC data were obtained from the OncoLnc TCGA data portal (www.oncolnc.org). A set of 360 HCC samples with high and low gene expression groups (50–50 percentile) was used for correlation graphs of two different genes. GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for mapping.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Results are expressed as mean ± SE (range). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Expression of SIRT3 in patients with HCC

Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was used to evaluate glucose metabolism. To investigate the correlation between glucose uptake and SIRT3 expression, 21 patients with HCC were divided into two groups according to 18F-FDG uptake: 9 patients with high glycolytic HCC with high 18F-FDG uptake and 12 with low glycolytic HCC with low 18F-FDG uptake. The mRNA expression of SIRT3 was higher in the low glycolytic group than in the high glycolytic group (Fig. 1a). To confirm our observation, we performed IHC analysis with HCC tissues from the two groups (n = 6 in each group). In patients with low FDG uptake, low membranous GLUT1 expression, low Ki67 expression, and high SIRT3 expression were observed in the tumor region (Fig. 1b and supplementary data 1). High Ki67 and low SIRT3 expression levels were observed in patients with high GLUT1 expression in the high FDG uptake group. In addition, we also confirmed the expression of SIRT3 in patients with HCC by western blotting (supplementary data 2). Downregulation of SIRT3 was determined also in HCC patients with high 18F-FDG uptake compare with low 18F-FDG uptake. Altogether, SIRT3 expression seemed to be associated with glycolytic metabolism and cell proliferation in patients with HCC.

Fig. 1
figure1

SIRT3 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and with different 18F-FDG uptake. a. RNA was extracted from frozen HCC samples obtained after transsphenoidal surgery. RT-PCR was performed using probe sets specific for SIRT3. The expression of the target genes was normalized to that of B2M (housekeeping gene) using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The boundary of the box closest to zero indicates the 25th percentile, the line within the box marks the median, and the boundary of the box farthest from zero indicates the 75th percentile. b. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human HCC samples were used and immunofluorescence was performed using the indicated antibodies and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bars: 50 μm. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.05

Full size image

Differential expression of SIRT3 in HCC cells

The expression of SIRT3 was assessed in three HCC cell lines (HepG2, Hep3B and Huh7), liver adenocarcinoma cell line with characteristics of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (SK-Hep1) [31], and their xenograft models with different rates of proliferation and glycolysis. HepG2 cells showed the highest expression of SIRT3 at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2a, b and supporting data),.. Similar to human patients with HCC, an inverse correlation between GLUT1 and SIRT3 was observed in an HCC xenograft model (Fig. 2c). Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between SIRT3 and Ki67. HepG2 and Hep3B cells had low Ki67 and high SIRT3 expression, whereas Huh7 and SK-HEP1 cells had high Ki67 and low SIRT3 expression. These results were consistent with the TCGA database analysis of human HCC samples (Supporting data 3A and 1B). Spearman’s correlation also showed a significant negative correlation between SIRT3 and Ki67 (Spearman’s coefficient r = − 0.3093, P < 0.0001), and SIRT3 and HK2 (Spearman r = − 0.239, P < 0.0001). To further corroborate our findings, SIRT3 was overexpressed in Huh 7 cells with low basal SIRT3 expression. Overexpression of SIRT3 reduced the expression of Ki67 and GLUT1 and also significantly reduced glucose uptake (Fig. 2d and e). Taken together, our results indicate that SIRT3 expression is negatively correlated with glycolytic metabolism and proliferation in HCC cells and in their xenograft models.

Fig. 2
figure2

Expression of SIRT3 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines and HCC xenograft models. aSIRT3 expression in four different HCC cell lines was measured using quantitative RT-PCR. The expression level of target genes was normalized to that of the housekeeping gene B2M using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. b Western blotting in different HCC cell lines using antibodies against SIRT3 and actin. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S1. c Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissues from HCC xenograft model were used. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against SIRT3, GLUT1, and Ki67 and counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bars: 20 μm. d Huh7 cells were transfected with MOCK vector and pcDNA-SIRT3. After 48 h of incubation, protein was extracted and the expression of SIRT3, Ki67, and actin was determined using western blotting. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S2. e Glucose uptake was measured using Glucose-Glo Assay. Data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad PrismComparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.01

Full size image

The relationship between SIRT3 expression levels and sorafenib treatment

Because our results suggested a crucial role of SIRT3 in HCC, we next investigated whether the expression of SIRT3 was changed by sorafenib treatment by incubating HCC cell lines with sorafenib for 48 h. We observed that the expression of SIRT3 in HCC cells decreased after treatment with 10 μM sorafenib (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, a more prominent decrease in Huh7 cell proliferation was observed in cells transfected with SIRT3 than in cells transfected with MOCK (Fig. 3b and c). In addition, we generated SIRT3 KD stable cell line using HepG2 cells. The sensitivity against sorafenib was significantly reduced in SIRT3 KD stable cells compare with control stable cells, suggesting that the expression of SIRT3 enhances the sensitivity of HCC cells to sorafenib (Fig. 3d and supplementary data 4). Together, these results suggest that modulation of SIRT3 might be an effective strategy to increase the sensitivity to sorafenib.

Fig. 3
figure3

The relationship between SIRT3 expression levels and sorafenib treatment. a Reduced SIRT3 expression upon sorafenib treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. HCC cells were incubated with DMSO, 1 μM sorafenib, or 10 μM sorafenib. After 48 h, the level of SIRT3 and actin was measured by western blotting. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are in Additional file 2: Fig. S3. b Huh7 cells were transfected with MOCK or pcDNA-SIRT3. After 24 h, the cells were treated with 10 μM sorafenib for further 24 h and then western blotting was carried out to determine SIRT3 and β-actin expression. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are in Additional file 2: Fig. S4. c Cell proliferation was measured using WST-1 assays. Data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. d SIRT3 KD or control stable cell line were incubated with indicated concentration of sorafenib. After 48 h, cell proliferation was measured using WST-1 assays. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

Full size image

Negative correlation between SIRT3 and pRb

PD0332991, a highly selective inhibitor of CDK4/CDK6 kinases with the ability to block phosphorylation activity of Rb, has become a novel therapeutic candidate for HCC [32]. We assessed the expression of pRb in patients with HCC to determine whether PD0332991 can be a candidate drug to increase the sensitivity of sorafenib by modulation of SIRT3 expression. IHC was performed using antibody specific for pRb using HCC xenograft models. Huh7 and skHep1-xenograft models with low SIRT3 expression showed high expression of pRb. Thus, the expression of pRb and SIRT3 had a negative correlation in HCC xenograft models (Fig. 4a and supplementary data 5A). In human HCC, Rb mRNA levels were significantly higher and those of SIRT3 mRNA were relatively lower in the high 18F-FDG group than in the low 18F-FDG group (Fig. 4b). Spearman’s correlation also showed a significant negative correlation between SIRT3 and Rb1 (Spearman’s coefficient r = − 0.3408, P < 0.0001) expression levels in human HCC patients by TCGA data analysis (Supplementary data 3D). Moreover, we also observed a negative correlation between the expression of pRb and SIRT3 in human patients with HCC (Fig. 4c and Supplementary data 5B).

Fig. 4
figure4

Negative correlation between SIRT3 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb). a Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) liver tissues from HCC xenograft model were used. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antidies against phosphor-Rb (pRb) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bars: 50 μm. b RNA was extracted from frozen HCC samples obtained after transsphenoidal surgery. RT-PCR was performed using probe sets specific for Rb. The expression of the target genes was normalized to that of B2M (housekeeping gene) using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The boundary of the box closest to zero indicates the 25th percentile, the line within the box marks the median, and the boundary of the box farthest from zero indicates the 75th percentile. *P < 0.05. c FFPE liver tissues from human patients with HCC were used. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against SIRT3 (left) and pRb (right) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bars: 50 μm

Full size image

SIRT3 expression is upregulated upon treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor

Because a connection between SIRT3 and pRb was identified in this study, we investigated whether PD0332991 can modulate the expression of SIRT3 to enhance the sorafenib sensitivity in HCC cells. Upon PD0332991 treatment, the expression of SIRT3 increased in HepG2. In SK-HEP1 and Huh7 cells, SIRT3 expression increased marginally compared with that in the control (Fig. 5a). However, no significant change was observed in Hep3B cells. It is possible that Hep3B cells present mutations of Rb that underlie the relative resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition [33, 34]. Therefore, Hep3B cells were excluded from further experiments. In addition to PD0332991 treatment, we investigated the expression of SIRT3 upon knockdown of CDK4/6 in HCC cells. Similar to that after PD0332991 treatment, SIRT3 expression was upregulated in CDK4/6 knockdown HepG2 cells, Huh7 cells and SK-Hep1 cells (Fig. 5b-d). The expression of PCNA, a proliferation marker, decreased upon CDK4/6 silencing, which had an effect similar to that of treatment with PD0332991 (Fig. 5b-d).

Fig. 5
figure5

SIRT3 induction after PD0332991 treatment. a HepG2, Hep3B, SK-Hep1, and Huh7 cells were incubated with DMSO, 1 μM PD0332991, or 10 μM PD0332991. After 48 h, SIRT3 and actin levels were evaluated using western blotting. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S5. b-d HepG2 cells (b), Huh7 cells (c), SK-Hep1 cells (d) were transfected with scrambled siRNA oligos or siRNA oligos against CDK4/6. After 48 h, western blotting was performed to detect indicated proteins. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length original blots are shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S6, S7 and S8. e Fold change of the indicated genes obtained by gene expression profiling of HepG2 cells after transfection with scrambled siRNA oligos or siRNA oligos targeting CDK4/6. All data are uploaded into the GEO database under the accession number GSE145389

Full size image

Our data suggested that SIRT3 expression is negatively correlated with glucose metabolism (Fig. 1a and b). Thus, we assessed the expression of glycolysis- and TCA-related genes after CDK4/6 inhibition in HepG2 cells by microarray analysis. A reduction in the expression of glycolysis-related genes, including SLC2A1 (fold change: 0.12), PFKP (fold change: 0.341), PKM (fold change: 0.457), and HK2 (fold change: 0.693) was observed in CDK4/6 KD HepG2 cells (Fig. 5e). In addition, the most dysregulated genes in the two sample groups (scramble vs. CDK4/6 KD) were associated with the following categories: DNA replication, meiotic cell cycle process, chromosome segregation, regulation of fatty acid oxidation, lipid catabolic process, and regulation of lipid catabolic process (Supporting data 3). The rate of dysregulation in glycolysis-related genes after PD0332991 treatment was smaller compared with that after CDK4/6 KD (Fig. 5e). Thus, we identified a novel mechanism to modulate SIRT3 expression by CDK4/6 inhibition, resulting in the inhibition of glycolysis and cell proliferation.

Enhancement of anti-cancer effect of sorafenib during combination treatment with PD0332991

We next aimed to investigate whether upregulation of SIRT3 by the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 could enhance the anti-cancer effect of sorafenib on HCC cells. We performed combination treatment with sorafenib and PD0332991 in HepG2. Both SIRT3 mRNA and protein expression were upregulated in HepG2 cells exposed to the two drugs (Fig. 6a and b). In these conditions, we also noticed a more pronounced reduction of cell viability compared with single treatment (Fig. 6c). To confirm, we generated 3-dimensional spheroids from HepG2 cells. The spheroid size of the HepG2 cells after the combined treatment was more reduced, compared with that after single treatment. We also performed western blotting and observed increased level of SIRT3 after PD0332991 treatment, and after the combined treatment, compared with that after control and sorafenib treatment (Sup data 7). Huh7 cells showed the same results as HepG2 with the exception of SIRT3 mRNA expression because of the very low basal level of SIRT3 mRNA in Huh7 cells (Fig. 6d and e). To confirm the increased anti-cancer effect of the combined treatment, we also measured migration of cells after treatment with soranfenib, PD0332991 or their combination. The migration of HepG2 and Huh7 cells were further reduced after the combined treatment compared with that after single treatment (Fig. 7a, b and c). In parallel, we performed cell cycle analysis, immunostaining of ki67 and apoptosis assay in HepG2 cells and Huh7 cells. In cell cycle analysis, we observed reduced reduction of G2/M phase compare with single treatment in HepG2 cells. In Huh7, G2/M and S phase were reduced after combined treatment with both compound (Supplementary data 8A). Also, immunostaining of Ki67 was determined in HepG2 and huh7 cells after combined treatment. Ki67 positive cells were dramatically decreased in cells with combined treatment (Supplementary data 8B and C). Moreover, annexin V-PI staining demonstrated that combined treatment with sorafenib and PD033291 increased early and late apoptosis (Fig. 7d and supplementary data 8D). Altogether, these results show that upregulation of SIRT3 by CDK4/6 inhibition enhances the sensitivity to sorafenib treatment in HCC cells.

Fig. 6
figure6

Increased sensitivity to sorafenib after combined treatment with sorafenib and PD0332991. a HepG2 cells were incubated with DMSO or 10 μM PD0332991 with or without 1 μM sorafenib. After 48 h, SIRT3 levels were analyzed using qRT-PCR. The expression level of target genes was normalized to that of the housekeeping gene B2M using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. b Cells were treated as in (A). Protein was extracted and the expression of SIRT3 and actin was determined using western blotting. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S9. c In parallel, proliferation was assessed 48 h later using WST-1 assays. d Huh7 cells were incubated with DMSO, or 10 μM PD0332991 with or without 1 μM sorafenib. After 48 h, protein was extracted and the expression of SIRT3 and actin was determined using western blotting. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S10. e In parallel, proliferation was assessed 48 h later using WST-1 assays. Data from six technical replicates were analyzed and expressed as the mean ± SD

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure7

The enhancement of the growth inhibition after combined treatment of sorafenib and PD0332991 in HepG2 cells and Huh7 cells. a Migration assay was performed. Penetrating HepG2 cells and Huh7 cells after treatment with indicated compound for 24 h were fixed and visualized by the staining of crystal violet. b, c Quantitative analyses were performed for the cells migrating through the matrigel-coated filter. Five random fields of each test at × 200 magnifications were counted. d, f Analysis of apoptosis by Annexin V-APC/propidium iodide (PI) double staining of HepG2 and Huh7 cells after 24 h treatment with indicated compound. Two-color flow cytometry dot plots show the percentages of living cells as negative for both annexin V and PI; early-stage apoptotic cells as the populations testing Annexin V positive and PI negative, and late-stage apoptotic/necrotic cells as double-positive cells. Results are represented in as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (range). Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test.*, P < 0.05;**, P < 0.01;;***, P < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

Several studies have emphasized the importance of SIRT3 in carcinogenesis [9, 24, 35]. However, there have been few studies on the mechanisms that control SIRT3 expression or on the discovery of clinically applicable drugs that can modulate it. In this study, we investigated a novel function of CDK4 /6 inhibitor as an inducer of SIRT3, resulting in enhanced sensitivity to sorafenib treatment in HCC cells.

To date, SIRT3 is known as a tumor suppressor gene [23], and overexpression of SIRT3 reduces cell growth and proliferation in HCC [23, 25, 26]. SIRT3 also induces apoptosis in abnormal cells through the upregulation of MnSOD, p53, Bax, and Fas [19]. Wang et al., determined patient survival and outcome in patients with HCC according to SIRT3 expression [36]. In fact, reduced expression of SIRT3 was associated with poor prognosis, whereas intra-tumoral SIRT3 expression was reported as a good prognostic factor in the early stages. So far, the effect of SIRT3 on glucose metabolism has been studied in cancers other than HCC [37,38,39]. Finley et al. proposed that SIRT3 loss increases ROS levels and promotes tumorigenesis by altering global cellular metabolism [24]. In this study, patients with HCC were divided into low and high glycolytic groups by 18F-FDG-PET analysis. Consistent with previous results with other tumor types, we found high SIRT3 and low Ki67 expression in the low glycolytic group of patients with HCC. Thus, our study suggests that SIRT3 expression is associated with glycolysis and proliferation in human HCCs. Indeed, upregulation of SIRT3 by CDK4/6 inhibition and treatment with PD0332991 induced the downregulation of glycolysis-related genes in our gene analysis.

Selective CDK4/6 inhibitors, including PD0332991, are currently used for the treatment of a variety of tumor types, including breast cancer, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer [40,41,42]. In this study, we found that CDK4/6 inhibition by treatment with siCDK4/6 or PD0332991 upregulated SIRT3 expression. Previous studies have determined that SIRT1 is involved in the regulation of SIRT3 expression by deacetylation and binding as a transcription factor [43]. In addition, SIRT1 is involved in the deacetylation of retinoblastoma (Rb), leading to dissociation of E2F1 and enhanced cell proliferation [44]. Therefore, there might be a correlation among SIRT3, SIRT1, and pRB expression levels in HCC cells. Indeed, there was a negative correlation between SIRT1 and SIRT3 expression in data from patients with HCC from the TCGA database (Supplementary Fig. 1C). However, the mechanism of SIRT3 expression by CDK4/6 inhibition remains unclear, and should be investigated in future studies.

Sorafenib has not been effective in patients with advanced HCC, and its use is often associated with reduction of drug sensitivity. Therefore, it is very important to identify a drug candidate that can replace or be used together with sorafenib. Tao et al. found that upregulation of SIRT3 expression can enhance the sensitivity of HCC cells to chemotherapeutic agents [26]. In our study, we found that the upregulation of SIRT3 by transfection in HCC cells reduced cell proliferation and significantly increased sensitivity to sorafenib. Moreover, the restoration of SIRT3 by PD0332991 could increase sensitivity to sorafenib, resulting in enhanced inhibition of proliferation and migration in HCC cells.

Thus, we propose SIRT3 expression as a predictor of sorafenib response. To concrete our observations in the in vitro system, preclinical studies will be conducted in the future.18F-FDG is a surrogate imaging modality to measure glucose metabolism in patients with HCC. However, there are few studies on 18F-FDG imaging in patients treated with sorafenib [45]. Our results prove the negative correlation between the expression of SIRT3 and glucose metabolism using human HCC tissues and HCC cells in vitro. Since the expression of SIRT3 is a predictor of response to sorafenib, [18F] FDG-PET imaging could monitor the drug sensitivity in HCC patients clinically during sorafenib treatment.

Conclusion

In summmary, our data indicate the importance of CDK4/6 inhibitors as a new approach to improve HCC therapy. Moreover, our study shows that induction of SIRT3 by CDK4/6 inhibition causes inhibition of cell growth and glucose metabolism and increased susceptibility to chemotherapy. Thus, the modulation of SIRT3 might be a novel treatment in patients with HCC and, possibly, other cancers in which SIRT3 acts as a tumor suppressor.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

RT-PCR:

Real-time polymerase chain reaction

FDG:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

CDK:

Cyclin-dependent kinases

References

  1. 1.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1301–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L, Wilkie D, McNabola A, Rong H, Chen C, Zhang X, Vincent P, McHugh M, et al. BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):7099–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gauthier A, Ho M. Role of sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(2):147–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Villanueva A, Llovet JM. Second-line therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: emergence of resistance to sorafenib. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(7):1824–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Abou-Alfa GK, Schwartz L, Ricci S, Amadori D, Santoro A, Figer A, De Greve J, Douillard JY, Lathia C, Schwartz B, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(26):4293–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yuan H, Su L, Chen WY. The emerging and diverse roles of sirtuins in cancer: a clinical perspective. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:1399–416.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Verdin E, Hirschey MD, Finley LW, Haigis MC. Sirtuin regulation of mitochondria: energy production, apoptosis, and signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35(12):669–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Haigis MC, Deng CX, Finley LW, Kim HS, Gius D. SIRT3 is a mitochondrial tumor suppressor: a scientific tale that connects aberrant cellular ROS, the Warburg effect, and carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72(10):2468–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Onyango P, Celic I, McCaffery JM, Boeke JD, Feinberg AP. SIRT3, a human SIR2 homologue, is an NAD-dependent deacetylase localized to mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(21):13653–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schwer B, North BJ, Frye RA, Ott M, Verdin E. The human silent information regulator (sir)2 homologue hSIRT3 is a mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent deacetylase. J Cell Biol. 2002;158(4):647–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang Q, Li L, Li CY, Pei Z, Zhou M, Li N. SIRT3 protects cells from hypoxia via PGC-1alpha- and MnSOD-dependent pathways. Neuroscience. 2015;286:109–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Alhazzazi TY, Kamarajan P, Verdin E, Kapila YL. SIRT3 and cancer: tumor promoter or suppressor? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1816(1):80–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiong Y, Wang M, Zhao J, Han Y, Jia L. Sirtuin 3: a Janus face in cancer (review). Int J Oncol. 2016;49(6):2227–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Torrens-Mas M, Oliver J, Roca P, Sastre-Serra J. SIRT3: Oncogene and Tumor Suppressor in Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2017;9(7):50.

  16. 16.

    Alhazzazi TY, Kamarajan P, Joo N, Huang JY, Verdin E, D'Silva NJ, Kapila YL. Sirtuin-3 (SIRT3), a novel potential therapeutic target for oral cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(8):1670–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    George J, Nihal M, Singh CK, Zhong W, Liu X, Ahmad N. Pro-proliferative function of mitochondrial Sirtuin Deacetylase SIRT3 in human melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(4):809–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang B, Qin L, Zhou CJ, Liu YL, Qian HX, He SB. SIRT3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and its impact on proliferation and invasion of hepatoma cells. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013;6(8):649–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liu Y, Liu YL, Cheng W, Yin XM, Jiang B. The expression of SIRT3 in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and the mechanism of its tumor suppressing effects. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(5):978–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Desouki MM, Doubinskaia I, Gius D, Abdulkadir SA. Decreased mitochondrial SIRT3 expression is a potential molecular biomarker associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(5):1071–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dong XC, Jing LM, Wang WX, Gao YX. Down-regulation of SIRT3 promotes ovarian carcinoma metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;475(3):245–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yu W, Denu RA, Krautkramer KA, Grindle KM, Yang DT, Asimakopoulos F, Hematti P, Denu JM. Loss of SIRT3 provides growth advantage for B cell malignancies. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(7):3268–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Song CL, Tang H, Ran LK, Ko BC, Zhang ZZ, Chen X, Ren JH, Tao NN, Li WY, Huang AL, et al. Sirtuin 3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth through the glycogen synthase kinase-3beta/BCL2-associated X protein-dependent apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 2016;35(5):631–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Finley LW, Carracedo A, Lee J, Souza A, Egia A, Zhang J, Teruya-Feldstein J, Moreira PI, Cardoso SM, Clish CB, et al. SIRT3 opposes reprogramming of cancer cell metabolism through HIF1alpha destabilization. Cancer Cell. 2011;19(3):416–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang CZ, Liu L, Cai M, Pan Y, Fu J, Cao Y, Yun J. Low SIRT3 expression correlates with poor differentiation and unfavorable prognosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51703.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tao NN, Zhou HZ, Tang H, Cai XF, Zhang WL, Ren JH, Zhou L, Chen X, Chen K, Li WY, et al. Sirtuin 3 enhanced drug sensitivity of human hepatoma cells through glutathione S-transferase pi 1/JNK signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7(31):50117–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ramesh S, Govindarajulu M, Lynd T, Briggs G, Adamek D, Jones E, Heiner J, Majrashi M, Moore T, Amin R, et al. SIRT3 activator Honokiol attenuates beta-amyloid by modulating amyloidogenic pathway. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190350.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pillai VB, Kanwal A, Fang YH, Sharp WW, Samant S, Arbiser J, Gupta MP. Honokiol, an activator of Sirtuin-3 (SIRT3) preserves mitochondria and protects the heart from doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in mice. Oncotarget. 2017;8(21):34082–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lee M, Jeon JY, Neugent ML, Kim JW, Yun M. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2017;34(3–4):251–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee M, Marinoni I, Irmler M, Psaras T, Honegger JB, Beschorner R, Anastasov N, Beckers J, Theodoropoulou M, Roncaroli F, et al. Transcriptome analysis of MENX-associated rat pituitary adenomas identifies novel molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of human pituitary gonadotroph adenomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(1):137–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Heffelfinger SC, Hawkins HH, Barrish J, Taylor L, Darlington GJ. SK HEP-1: a human cell line of endothelial origin. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992;28A(2):136–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bollard J, Miguela V, Ruiz de Galarreta M, Venkatesh A, Bian CB, Roberto MP, Tovar V, Sia D, Molina-Sanchez P, Nguyen CB, et al. Palbociclib (PD-0332991), a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, restricts tumour growth in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2017;66(7):1286–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rivadeneira DB, Mayhew CN, Thangavel C, Sotillo E, Reed CA, Grana X, Knudsen ES. Proliferative suppression by CDK4/6 inhibition: complex function of the retinoblastoma pathway in liver tissue and hepatoma cells. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(5):1920–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ezhevsky SA, Nagahara H, Vocero-Akbani AM, Gius DR, Wei MC, Dowdy SF. Hypo-phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) by cyclin D:Cdk4/6 complexes results in active pRb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(20):10699–704.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kim HS, Patel K, Muldoon-Jacobs K, Bisht KS, Aykin-Burns N, Pennington JD, van der Meer R, Nguyen P, Savage J, Owens KM, et al. SIRT3 is a mitochondria-localized tumor suppressor required for maintenance of mitochondrial integrity and metabolism during stress. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(1):41–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang JX, Yi Y, Li YW, Cai XY, He HW, Ni XC, Zhou J, Cheng YF, Jin JJ, Fan J, et al. Down-regulation of sirtuin 3 is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:297.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yang Y, Cao Y, Chen L, Liu F, Qi Z, Cheng X, Wang Z. Cryptotanshinone suppresses cell proliferation and glucose metabolism via STAT3/SIRT3 signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Med. 2018;7(9):4610–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang S, Li J, Xie J, Liu F, Duan Y, Wu Y, Huang S, He X, Wang Z, Wu X. Programmed death ligand 1 promotes lymph node metastasis and glucose metabolism in cervical cancer by activating integrin beta4/SNAI1/SIRT3 signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2018;37(30):4164–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Xiang XY, Kang JS, Yang XC, Su J, Wu Y, Yan XY, Xue YN, Xu Y, Liu YH, Yu CY, et al. SIRT3 participates in glucose metabolism interruption and apoptosis induced by BH3 mimetic S1 in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2016;49(2):773–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yadav V, Burke TF, Huber L, Van Horn RD, Zhang Y, Buchanan SG, Chan EM, Starling JJ, Beckmann RP, Peng SB. The CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219 overcomes vemurafenib resistance resulting from MAPK reactivation and cyclin D1 upregulation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(10):2253–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Naz S, Sowers A, Choudhuri R, Wissler M, Gamson J, Mathias A, Cook JA, Mitchell JB. Abemaciclib, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, enhances the Radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung Cancer in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(16):3994–4005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Finn RS, Dering J, Conklin D, Kalous O, Cohen DJ, Desai AJ, Ginther C, Atefi M, Chen I, Fowst C, et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(5):R77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Carnevale I, Pellegrini L, D'Aquila P, Saladini S, Lococo E, Polletta L, Vernucci E, Foglio E, Coppola S, Sansone L, et al. SIRT1-SIRT3 Axis regulates cellular response to oxidative stress and Etoposide. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(7):1835–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jablonska B, Gierdalski M, Chew LJ, Hawley T, Catron M, Lichauco A, Cabrera-Luque J, Yuen T, Rowitch D, Gallo V. Sirt1 regulates glial progenitor proliferation and regeneration in white matter after neonatal brain injury. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13866.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lee JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Ahn SH, Han KH, Seo HJ, Lee JD, Choi HJ. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib. Liver Int. 2011;31(8):1144–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Seoul, Korea; grant numbers NRF-2016R1E1A1A01943303, and NRF-2018R1C1B6003894) and by an Incheon National University Research Grant (Incheon, Korea) in 2016. The funding source had no involvement in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea

    Hanhee Jo, Yusun Park, Jisu Kim, Jong Sook Lee & Misu Lee

  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea

    Hanhee Jo, Seon Yoo Kim, Jee-in Chung, Hae yong Ko & Mijin Yun

  3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Taehun Kim & Jae-Chul Pyun

  4. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Kyung Sik Kim

Authors
  1. Hanhee Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yusun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taehun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jisu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jong Sook Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seon Yoo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jee-in Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hae yong Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jae-Chul Pyun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kyung Sik Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Misu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mijin Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LMS, YMJ, KKS and PJC conceived and designed the research. JHH, KTH PYS, KJS, LJS and KYS performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. KKS, CJI and KHY discussed the data and provided constructive suggestions. LMS and YMJ supervised the study. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Misu Lee or Mijin Yun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Yonsei University Health System Severance Hospital (Seoul, South Korea) and the study was conducted using the current guidelines for ethical research (Yonsei IRB number: 4–2015-0904). Written informed consents have attained from patients. The in vivo experiments were approved by the Institutional Committee for Animal Research and kept to the national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals (GB14925–2010).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1 Supplementary Data 1

. Quantification of immunostaining. (A, C) Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) indicating the expression of (A) SIRT3 and membranous (C) GLUT1 from 12 patients with high FDG uptake (n = 6) and low FDG uptake (n = 6). Quantification of fluorescence in microscopic images stained with GFP (Green) and DsRed (Red) was carried out using IMT i-Solution software (Martin Microscope Company, Easley, USA). (B) Ki67 positive cells in positive and negative tumor regions of indicated proteins in HCC with high FDG uptake. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Supplementary Data 2. SIRT3 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and with different 18F-FDG uptake. (A) Protein was extracted from frozen HCC samples obtained after transsphenoidal surgery. Western blotting was performed using antibodies against SIRT3 and actin. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S11. (B) Band quantification was carried out using ImageJ. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SE. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.05. Supplementary Data 3. TCGA data analysis. The indicated mRNA level of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma data was obtained from OncoLnc (www.oncolnc.org) TCGA data portal. Supplementary Data 4. SIRT3 expression in SIRT3 knockdown and control stable clones. The ratios of the band intensities were normalized by actin and are reported below the respective panels. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S12. Supplementary Data 5. Quantification of immunostaining. We quantified the positive area of SIRT3 (A) and membranous GLUT1 (C) from indicated xenograft model in Fig. 2c. (B) We counted the Ki67 positive cells in tumor region of Fig. 2c. (C) We quantified the positive cells of pRb from indicated xenograft model in Fig. 4a. (D) Correlation of SIRT3 and pRb was performed in patients with HCC. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (range). Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney test. *, P < 0.05;**, P < 0.01. Supplementary Data 6. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Supplementary Data 7. The effect of combined treatment of sorafenib and PD033291 on spheroids from HepG2 cells. (A) HepG2 cells were plated in low-affinity 96-well plates. After the formation of spheroids, HepG2 cells were treated with vehicle, 10 μM sorafenib, or PD033291 for the indicated incubation time. (B) Spheroid size was measured using Image J software after microscopy-based imaging based on six individual spheroids in each condition. Data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. Data were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (C) In parallel, western blotting was performed to detect SIRT3 and actin. The images shown here are cropped and the full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 2: Fig. S13. Supplementary Data 8. Synergistic antitumoral effects of sorafenib and PD0332991 (A) The cell cycle analysis after treatment with the combination of sorafenib and PD0332991 in HepG2 and Huh7 cells. (B) HepG2 and Huh7 were plated on coverslips in 24-well plates. The next day, the cells were incubated with indicated compound. After 24 h, cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescent staining with Ki67 protein and counterstained with DAPI. (C) In parallel, we counted Ki67 positive cells. (D) Analysis of apoptosis by Annexin V-APC/propidium iodide (PI) double staining of HepG2 and Huh7 cells. Two-color flow cytometry dot plots show the percentages of living cells as negative for both annexin V and PI; early-stage apoptotic cells as the populations testing Annexin V positive and PI negative, and late-stage apoptotic/necrotic cells as double-positive cells. Supplementary Data 9. Quantification of western blotting of Figures.

Additional file 2 Figure S1.

Full-length original blots of Fig. 2b. Figure S2. Full-length original blots of Fig. 2d. Figure S3. Full-length original blots of Fig. 3a. Figure S4. Full-length original blots of Fig. 3b. Figure S5. Full-length original blots of Fig. 5a. Figure S6. Full-length original blots of Fig. 5b (HepG2). Figure S7. Full-length original blots of Fig. 5c(Huh7). Figure S8. Full-length original blots of Fig. 5d (SK-Hep1). Figure S9. Full-length original blots of Fig. 6b. Figure S10. Full-length original blots of Fig. 6d. Figure S11. Full-length original blots of Supporting data 2. Figure S12. Full-length original blots of Supporting data 4. Figure S13. Full-length original blots of Supporting data 7.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, H., Park, Y., Kim, T. et al. Modulation of SIRT3 expression through CDK4/6 enhances the anti-cancer effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer 20, 332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06822-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • SIRT3
  • Sorafenib
  • Anti-tumor effect
  • Drug sensitivity
  • CDK4/6 inhibitor

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us