Skip to main content

Blocking podoplanin suppresses growth and pulmonary metastasis of human malignant melanoma



Podoplanin (PDPN), a transmembrane O-glycoprotein, is up-regulated in many tumors and is involved in tumor metastasis and malignant progression. In previous studies, we generated a functional blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb, SZ168) against the extracellular domain of human PDPN. This study is aimed to investigate whether blocking PDPN by SZ168 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis.


Malignant melanoma xenograft model by inoculating subcutaneously human malignant melanoma cell line C8161 into the back of BALB/c nude mice was used. Endogenous PDPN expression in C8161 cells and nasopharyngeal cancer cell line CNE-2 was detected using western blot and flow cytometry.


SZ168 significantly inhibited C8161 or CNE-2 cell-induced platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner with a maximal inhibition of 73.9 ± 3.0% in C8161 cells or 77.1 ± 2.7% in CNE-2 cells. Moreover, SZ168 inhibited the growth and pulmonary metastasis of C8161cells in vivo. The number of lung metastatic foci in the SZ168-treated group was significantly decreased compared with that in the control mouse IgG group (1.61 ± 0.44 vs.3.83 ± 0.60, P < 0.01). Subcutaneous tumor volume, weight, and incidence were also significantly reduced in the SZ168-treated group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, SZ168 recognized PDPN in immunohistochemical analyses of tumor tissue sections.


SZ168 blocks growth and pulmonary metastasis of human malignant melanoma by inhibiting the interaction between tumor PDPN and platelet CLEC-2 and therefore is a promising antibody for therapeutic development against malignant melanoma.

Peer Review reports


Tumor growth and metastasis are highly complex processes that are affected by a wide variety of factors. Extensive evidence suggests that platelets play a key role in tumor cell proliferation and metastasis [1, 2]. One of the mechanisms is tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation (TCIPA) [3, 4], which may enhance embolism in the microvasculature and prevents elimination by host immune system.

Podoplanin (PDPN) is a transmembrane sialo-glycoprotein and its overexpression has been detected in many types of tumors, including squamous cell carcinoma [5,6,7], malignant mesothelioma [8, 9], Kaposi’s sarcoma [10], testicular seminoma [11], and brain tumors [12]. Recent studies suggested that the role of PDPN is associated with tumor metastasis, malignancy, and poor prognosis [13,14,15,16,17,18]. The extracellular domain of PDPN contains a heavily glycosylated amino terminal of approximately 130 amino acids, and conserved amino acid sequence EDXXVTPG is designated as the platelet aggregation stimulating (PLAG) domain [19]. PDPN is the only known endogenous ligand of the C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) expressed on platelets [20]. The binding of tumor cell PDPN to platelet CLEC-2 triggers platelet activation and aggregation [21, 22]. To date, a number of anti-human PDPN monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been established; however, other than the rat anti-hPDPN mAb NZ-1 and a few mAbs that inhibit PDPN-induced platelet aggregation [23], most fail to block the interaction between PDPN and CLEC-2.

We have produced mAbs (SZ163 and SZ168) against the extracellular domain of human PDPN, and both exhibited high specificity and sensitivity [24]. An SZ163/SZ168-double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to quantitate plasma-soluble PDPN in cancer patients and evaluate the correlation between PDPN and tumor occurrence and metastasis [24], although it is unknown whether SZ163 and SZ168 inhibit the growth and metastases in PDPN-expressing human tumors.

In this study, we showed that SZ168 inhibited platelet aggregation induced by PDPN-expressing human cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, we found that SZ168 inhibited tumor growth and suppresses pulmonary metastasis in PDPN-expressing tumors in vivo.



Female BALB/c nude mice (4–5 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai SLRC Experimental Animal Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Compressed CO2 asphyxiation was used to sacrifice mice in accordance with the recommendations of the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Use and Ethics Committee of Soochow University (Suzhou, China).

Cell lines

The Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells line CNE-2, and C8161 melanoma cell line were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). NCI-H226 human non-small cell lung tumor cell line was purchased from Jiangsu KeyGEN BioTECH Co. Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Mycoplasma Stain Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China) was used for testing mycoplasma contamination. None of the cell cultures were contaminated with mycoplasma. CHO cells expressing human podoplanin (CHO/hPDPN) were established as described previously [25]. CHO/hPDPN and C8161 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). CNE-2 and NCI-H226 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone), supplemented with 10% FBS. These cell lines were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. All human materials related studies were approved the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.


SZ163 and SZ168, two mouse anti-hPDPN mAbs, were developed as described previously [24]. A mouse anti-hPDPN mAb (18H5), a normal mouse IgG (ab188776), and a rabbit anti-hPDPN mAb (EPR7072) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). A mouse beta-actin antibody was purchased from ProteinTech (Wuhan, China). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibodies (FITC-GAM IgG) were purchased from Beckman-Coulter (Suzhou, China).

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry was performed as previously described [24]. Cultured cells were harvested by brief exposure to trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) treatment and then incubated with 18H5 as a positive control, mouse IgG as a negative control, or anti-PDPN antibodies (SZ163 and SZ168, 2 μg) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by FITC-GAM IgG as secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Flow cytometry was performed using a Cytomics FC500 machine (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).

Western blot analysis

Cells were solubilized using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The lysates were separated with 10% reduced SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Pall Corporation, New York, USA). After blocking with 5% skim milk in 0.1% PBST, the membrane was incubated with SZ163 or SZ168 (3 μg/mL), a rabbit anti-hPDPN mAb (EPR7072; 1:2000), or beta-actin antibody (1:2000) for 2 h at room temperature. Specifically-bound primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit antibodies (1:10000, Immunotech, Marseille, France; 1:2000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, respectively) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Platelet aggregation assay

Human venous blood was collected from healthy donors in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All participants gave written informed consent for this study. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained from the whole blood supernatants by centrifugation at 100 x g for 10 min. The cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 1 × 107 cells/mL). For the antibody inhibition assay, cells were incubated with different concentrations of SZ163, SZ168, or control mouse IgG for 15 min on ice, followed by addition of 250 μL PRP. Platelet aggregation was measured in a Lumi-Aggregometer Model 700 (Chrono-log, Havertown, PA, USA). Data are provided as means ± SD of three independent experiments.

In vivo lung metastasis model

CHO/hPDPN cells were harvested from culture using trypsin, washed, and resuspended in PBS (1 × 107 cells/mL). The cells were incubated with SZ168 or mouse IgG and inoculated intravenously (1 × 106 cells/mouse) into the lateral tail vein of (4–5 weeks old) female BALB/c nude mice. A total of 36 mice were used for three independent experiments, and each experiment involved 6 mice in the mouse IgG negative control group and 6 mice in the SZ168 treatment group. After 30 d, the mice were euthanized, and the number of lung surface metastatic foci was counted. The lungs and primary tumor tissues were also harvested for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.

Immunohistochemical (IHC)

All tissue samples were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin, and 5-μm sections were cut out. After dewaxing, hydration, and antigen retrieval, sections were incubated with 2 μg/mL SZ168 or 18H5 overnight at 4 °C, followed by treatment with the Envision+ kit (MBX, Fuzhou, China) for 30 min and 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; MBX) for 1 min. Sections were subsequently counterstained with hematoxylin (MBX).


CHO/hPDPN or C8161 cells were trypsinized, washed, and suspended with PBS (5 × 106 cells/mL). The cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the backs of BALB/c nude mice (4–5 weeks old) at a dose of 200 μL per mouse. After 1 d, 30 μL of 1 mg/mL SZ168 or control mouse IgG were intravenously injected once a week for 3 weeks. Thirty-six mice were carried out for three independent experiments at different times, and each experiment was divided into mouse IgG negative control group mice and SZ168 treatment group, 6 mice per group. Tumor volumes were calculated every 3 d from caliper measurements of tumor dimensions using the formula (L × W2)/2, where L is the longer measurement. The mice were euthanized 27 or 30 d after tumor cell implantation. The lung tissues were harvested for H&E staining.

Quantification of growth factors

C8161 cells (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) were incubated with washed platelets (5 × 105 platelets/mL) for 8 h at 37 °C in a 96-well culture plate (n = 6). After centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatants of the reaction mixtures were designated C8161-platelet reactants. The quantification of human growth factors, including PDGF and TGF-β-1, in the C8161-platelet reactants was conducted using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). All ELISA kits were purchased from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany) and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD. Mann-Whitney U-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine the statistical significance of the results in the tumor growth and metastasis models in vivo. *P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical tests were two-sided.


SZ163 and SZ168 detect PDPN expression on the membrane of C8161 and CNE-2 cells

Our previous study found that SZ163 and SZ168 detected hPDPN in CHO/hPDPN, NCI-H226, and U87 cells but not CHO cells [24], indicating that SZ163 and SZ168 specifically recognize hPDPN. Flow cytometry assay showed that SZ163 and SZ168 also detected endogenous PDPN in the human cancer cell lines C8161 and CNE-2, similarly to the 18H5 as positive control antibody (Fig. 1a, b). Additionally, western blot analysis revealed that both SZ163 and SZ168 bound to endogenous PDPN (36 or 25 kDa) in C8161 and CNE-2 cells (Fig. 1c, d).

Fig. 1

PDPN expression in human cancer cells is detected by mAbs SZ163 and SZ168. (a) C8161 or (b) CNE-2 cells were harvested and incubated with SZ163, SZ168, 18H5 (positive control), or mouse IgG (negative control), followed by incubation with FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody before flow cytometric analysis. The cells lysates of (c) C8161 or (d) CNE-2 were separated by 10% reduced SDS-PAGE and subjected to western blot using different anti-hPDPN mAbs as indicated, including SZ163and SZ168

SZ168 inhibits platelet aggregation induced by human cancer cells with PDPN expression

Previously, Kato et al. showed that the PDPN-CLEC-2 interaction was essential for PDPN-induced platelet aggregation and that CHO/hPDPN cells but not CHO cells were able to induce platelet aggregation [19]. Therefore, we examined the ability of SZ163 and SZ168 to inhibit the platelet aggregation induced by C8161 or CNE-2 cells. Similarly, SZ168 significantly inhibited C8161- or CNE-2-induced platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner at 15, 20, and 25 μg/mL, whereas SZ163 did not (Fig. 2a, b). The maximal inhibition ratio of SZ168 was 73.9 ± 3.0% in C8161 cells at 20 μg/mL and 77.1 ± 2.7% in CNE-2 at 25 μg/mL of SZ168. Furthermore, SZ168 (15 μg/mL) also inhibited platelet aggregation induced by CHO/hPDPN and NCI-H226 cells with maximal inhibition ratios of 72.6 ± 3.4% and 74.2 ± 3.1%, respectively (Fig. 2c, d). Therefore, SZ168 is an anti-hPDPN mAb that inhibits platelet aggregation induced by tumor cells that express PDPN.

Fig. 2

SZ168 inhibits platelet aggregation induced by human cancer cells with PDPN expression. (a) C8161 cells were pre-incubated with control mouse IgG (20 μg/mL), SZ168 (20, 15 μg/mL), or SZ163 (20 μg/mL). (b) CNE-2 cells were pre-incubated with control mouse IgG (25 μg/mL), SZ168 (25, 20 μg/mL), or SZ163 (25 μg/mL). (c) CHO/hPDPN and (d) NCI-H226 cells were pre-incubated with control mouse IgG (15 μg/mL), SZ168 (15, 10 μg/mL), or SZ163 (15 μg/mL). All cells were then incubated with 250 μL PRP to examine platelet aggregation in a lumi-aggregometer

SZ168 suppresses pulmonary metastasis in vivo

We next evaluated the effect of SZ168 on tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Firstly, we examined whether SZ168 suppressed the pulmonary metastasis of intravenously-injected CHO/hPDPN cells. Although CHO cells have some metastatic potential, these cells become more metastatic following ectopic expression of PDPN [16]. The CHO/hPDPN cell-induced lung metastasis was nearly inhibited by administration of SZ168, and the number of metastatic foci (32.50 ± 5.70) was significantly lower than that of the control mouse IgG group (231.10 ± 27.25; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3b, e). Moreover, the number of tumor events in the mouse IgG-treated group (6.17 ± 0.95) was higher than that of the SZ168-treated group (1.44 ± 0.38; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3a, c, f). In addition, the weight of lungs was reduced in SZ168-treated mice (0.33 ± 0.05 g), compared to those in the control group (0.52 ± 0.07 g; P < 0.05) (Fig. 3d). Subcutaneous tumor formation was confirmed by H&E staining (Fig. 4a), and lung micro-metastasis foci and subcutaneous tumors were confirmed by immunostaining of PDPN using SZ168 (Fig. 4b, e, h) and 18H5 (Fig. 4c, f, i) antibodies. H&E staining revealed more metastatic foci in the lungs of the mouse IgG group than in those of the SZ168-treated group (Fig. 4d, h). These results indicated that SZ168 suppresses metastasis of CHO/hPDPN cells in both lung and subcutaneous tumors.

Fig. 3

SZ168 suppresses pulmonary metastasis in vivo. CHO/hPDPN cells were incubated with 30 μg SZ168 or mouse IgG. Cell suspensions were intravenously inoculated into BALB/c nude mice. (a) Comparison of the tumor sizes and tumor incidences in mice on day 30. (b) Representative pictures of the lungs. (c) Gross morphology of the tumors. (d) Lung weights. *P < 0.05. (e) Numbers of metastatic foci of the lungs. ***P < 0.001. (f) Tumor events. ***P < 0.001. Arrows indicate subcutaneous tumors. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 6)

Fig. 4

SZ168 detects hPDPN expression in the lung micro-metastasis foci and subcutaneous tumors in IHC analysis. The subcutaneous tumors (a) and lungs (d, g) were stained with H&E. Scale bar, 20 μm. Arrows indicate cancer nest. The subcutaneous tumors and lungs were incubated with SZ168 (b, e, h) or 18H5 (c, f, i) and then by the Envision+ kit reagents. Color was developed using DAB and subsequently counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bar, 200 or 20 μm. Arrows indicate cancer nest

SZ168 shows anti-tumor effect in CHO/hPDPN xenografts

A CHO/hPDPN xenograft model was used to further investigate the anti-tumor activity of SZ168 on primary tumor growth in vivo. The tumor formation was dramatically reduced in SZ168-treated group compared with that of control mouse IgG group (tumor incidence: 27.8% [5/18] vs. 61.1% [11/18]) (Fig. 5a). Meanwhile, tumor weight was significantly lower in the SZ168-treated group (0.09 ± 0.04 g) than in the control mouse IgG-treated group (0.63 ± 0.16 g; P < 0.01) (Fig. 5a). Tumor volumes were also significantly reduced by SZ168 treatment compared to IgG control treatment (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5

SZ168 inhibits tumor growth of CHO/hPDPN in vivo. CHO/hPDPN cells (1 × 106 cells) were implanted into BALB/c nude mice. After 1 d, SZ168 or mouse IgG (30 μg/mouse) antibody was injected into the lateral tail vein of mice. (a) Primary tumor weights. **P < 0.01. (b) Primary tumor growth. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 6)

SZ168 inhibits primary tumor growth and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis of C8161

To investigate the anti-tumor effect of SZ168 on endogenous hPDPN-expressing cancer cells in vivo, C8161 cells were used in the established tumor model, as described above. Similarly, SZ168 dramatically reduced tumor development in these mice (Fig. 6a). In addition, tumor volumes and tumor weights were significantly reduced by SZ168 treatment compared to control IgG treatment (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b, c). The number of metastatic foci in the SZ168-treated mice (1.61 ± 0.44) was significantly decreased compared to that in the control mouse IgG-treated mice (3.83 ± 0.60; P < 0.01) (Fig. 6d). Furthermore, H&E staining revealed that more metastatic foci were present in the lungs of the mice treated with mouse IgG than in those treated with SZ168 (Fig. 7a, d). Immunostaining with SZ168 (Fig. 7b, e) and 18H5 (Fig. 7c, f) detected PDPN and confirmed the presence of lung metastasis. Taken together, these results highlight the anti-tumor and anti-metastasis effects of SZ168.

Fig. 6

SZ168 restrains primary tumor development and spontaneous lung metastasis of C8161 cells in vivo. C8161 cells (1 × 106 cells) were inoculated subcutaneously into BALB/c nude mice. After 1 d, SZ168 or mouse IgG (30 μg/mouse) antibody was injected into the lateral tail vein of mice. (a) Gross morphology of the tumor xenografts. (b) Primary tumor growth. (c) Primary tumor weights. ***P < 0.001. (d) Numbers of metastatic foci of the lungs. **P < 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 6)

Fig. 7

SZ168 detects hPDPN expression in the lung micro-metastasis foci by immunohistochemistry. Lung sections were stained with H&E (a, d). Scale bar, 200 μm. Arrows indicate cancer nest. Sections were incubated with (b, e) SZ168 or (c, f) 18H5 antibody as well followed by the Envision+ kit reagents. Color was developed using DAB and then counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bar, 20 μm. Arrows indicate cancer nest

C8161 cells co-cultured with platelets induced the release of PDGF and TGFβ-1 from platelets

To reveal the contribution of the tumor-platelet interaction to the proliferation, transmigration, and invasion of C8161 cells, we measured the levels of platelet-derived growth factor PDGF-BB and transforming growth factor TGFβ-1 in the supernatants of C8161 cells co-cultured with platelets. As shown in Table 1, the concentrations of PDGF-BB and TGFβ-1 were notably higher in the group containing platelets (5 × 105 platelets/mL) co-cultured with C8161 cells (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) than in the negative control group (platelets alone) (*P < 0.05). Furthermore, after the C8161 group were pretreated with SZ-168, the concentrations of PDGF-BB and TGFβ-1 decreased compared to the negative control group (Mouse IgG) (**P < 0.05). These results suggest that the tumor-platelet interaction promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of C8161 cells, partly due to the interaction-induced release of PDGF-BB and TGFβ-1 by the platelets.

Table 1 C8161 cells induced the release of PDGF and TGFβ-1 from platelets


Platelets have been reported to be involved in tumor cell-growth, metastasis, and invasiveness [26,27,28]. The following possible mechanisms have been proposed: (i) tumor cells are coated by platelets in the microvasculature and form large tumor cell-platelet aggregates, (ii) tumor cell-platelet aggregates protect tumor cells by forming a physical shield to protect tumor cells, and (iii) activated platelets release soluble factors that enhance tumor motility [29]. In addition, the administration of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin has been found to prolong the survival of patients with advanced cancer [30]; however, administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs to patients receiving cancer therapy is risky due to bleeding concerns, particularly in patients’ chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. Thus, it is desirable to have a novel targeted therapy to block platelet-cancer cell interactions.

The interaction between tumor cell PDPN and platelet CLEC-2 drives tyrosine phosphorylation of the Src family kinases (Syk) and phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2), resulting in platelet activation and aggregation [22, 31]. Activated platelets release secretory factors, such as transforming growth factor-β, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and platelet-derived growth factor, promoting tumor growth and angiogenesis [32, 33]. CLEC-2-deficient platelets had normal adhesion and spreading on platelet agonists except for a snake venom protein rhodocytin, indicating that the inhibition of PDPN-CLEC-2 interaction does not interfere with physiological hemostasis [31]. Thus, platelet-targeted therapy may be useful and biologically safe. PDPN is expressed in many types of tumors, as well as in normal tissues, including lymphatic vessels, type I alveolar epithelium, and kidney podocytes. The interaction between PDPN and CLEC-2 not only promotes cancer cell-induced platelet aggregation but also plays an essential role in physiological processes. PDPN knock-out mice exhibit impaired congenital lymphedema and lymphatic injury patterns [31]. Since cancer cells may interfere with physiological interaction between PDPN and CLEC-2, targeting the PDPN and CLEC-2 interaction seems to be a reasonable cancer treatment.

SZ163 and SZ168, two mAbs against human PDPN previously produced in our laboratory, showed high reactivity with PDPN-expressing cell lines CHO/hPDPN, U87, and NCI-H226. In the present study, we found that SZ163 and SZ168 specifically recognize endogenous hPDPN in cancer cell lines C8161 and CNE-2 by flow cytometry and western blot. Furthermore, comparison of the reactivity between SZ168 and 18H5 against hPDPN showed that SZ168 may be more sensitive and useful than 18H5 in flow cytometry. Moreover, SZ168 significantly inhibited platelet aggregation induced by C8161, CNE-2, NCI-H226, or CHO/hPDPN in a dose-dependent manner, whereas SZ163 IgG did not. Furthermore, SZ168 suppressed tumor growth and metastasis in CHO/hPDPN and C8161cells in vivo. Both tumor weight and the number of lung micro-metastasis foci were significantly lower in the mice treated with SZ168 than in those treated with control mouse IgG group. It is reported that NZ-1 and MS-1 inhibit PDPN-CLEC-2 interaction in vitro, but whether these antibodies suppress human cancer growth and/or metastasis remains unknown [23, 34]. We found that SZ168 not only suppresses PDPN-induced platelet aggregation in vitro but also inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in both mouse (CHO/hPDPN) and human (C8161) cancer cells. The experimental results confirmed that the PDGF and TGFβ-1 secreted by platelets can significantly promote the metastasis of tumor cells. Moreover, the migration-promoting effects of PDGF and TGF-β were partially inhibited by the mAb SZ-168. Furthermore, SZ168 may also be useful for diagnostics in immuno-histochemical analysis due to its high sensitivity, similar to another anti-PDPN antibody, D2–40, which has been used as a marker for the diagnosis of many different human tumors by immunohistochemical analysis [5, 35].

Our data show that the growth of C8161 malignant melanoma is regulated via PDPN-CLEC-2-mediated platelet aggregation. Thus, SZ168 may suppress the growth of malignant melanoma cells in vivo by inhibiting platelet activation and reducing secretion of tumor growth factors. PDPN is up-regulated in skin melanoma, which is an aggressive tumor with an increasing incidence, a high degree of malignancy, and high metastatic rate [36, 37]. Notably, distant metastases in melanoma patients are associated with a lower five-year survival rate [38]. Our results indicate that SZ168 may be a promising antibody to be developed as targeted therapy for PDPN-expressing malignant melanoma.


Our study shows that SZ168 is a blocking antibody to human PDPN that inhibits the interaction between tumor PDPN and platelet CLEC-2. Our results indicate that SZ168 antibody has high potential for the development of novel antibody-based immunotherapy against PDPN-expressing tumors such as human malignant melanoma.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are presented in the manuscript, which will be freely available to any scientists wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes.



Chinese hamster ovary


CHO cells expressing human podoplanin


C-type lectin-like receptor 2




Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody


Hematoxylin and eosin




Monoclonal antibody


Phosphate-buffered saline




Platelet aggregation stimulating


Phospholipase C gamma 2


Platelet-rich plasma


Src family kinases


Tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation


  1. 1.

    Lowe KL, Navarro-Nunez L, Waston SP. Platelet CLEC-2 and podoplanin in cancer metastasis. Thromb Res. 2012;129(Suppl 1):S30–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tesfamariam B. Involvement of platelets in tumor cell metastasis. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;157:112–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gupta GP, Massague J. Platelets and metastasis revisited: a novel fatty link. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1691–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stegner D, Dutting S, Nieswandt B. Mechanistic explanation for platelet contribution to cancer metastasis. Thromb Res. 2014;133(Suppl 2):S149–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schacht V, Dadras SS, Johnson LA, et al. Up-regulation of the lymphatic marker podoplanin, a mucin-type transmembrane glycoprotein, in human squamous cell carcinomas and germ cell tumors. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:913–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wicki A, Lehembre F, Wick N, et al. Tumor invasion in the absence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition: podoplanin-mediated remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:261–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yuan P, Temam S, El-Naggar A, et al. Overexpression of podoplanin in oral cancer and its association with poor clinical outcome. Cancer. 2006;107:563–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kimura N, Kimura I. Podoplanin as a marker for mesothelioma. Pathol Int. 2005;55:83–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ordonez NG. D2-40 and podoplanin are highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemical markers of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:372–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weninger W, Partanen TA, Breiteneder-Geleff S, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 and podoplanin suggests a lymphatic endothelial cell origin of Kaposi's sarcoma tumor cells. Lab Invest. 1999;79:243–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kato Y, Sasagawa I, Kaneko M, et al. Aggrus: a diagnostic marker that distinguishes seminoma from embryonal carcinoma in testicular germ cell tumors. Oncogene. 2004;23:8552–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shibahara J, Kashima T, Kikuchi Y, Kunita A, Fukayama M. Podoplanin is expressed in subsets of tumors of the central nervous system. Virchows Arch. 2006;448(4):493–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hoshino A, Ishii G, Ito T, et al. Podoplanin-positive fibroblasts enhance lung adenocarcinoma tumor formation: podoplanin in fibroblast functions for tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4769–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kawaguchi H, El-Naggar AK, Papadimitrakopoulou V, et al. Podoplanin: a novel marker for oral cancer risk in patients with oral premalignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:354–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kawase A, Ishii G, Nagai K, et al. Podoplanin expression by cancer associated fibroblasts predicts poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:1053–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kunita A, Kashima TG, Morishita Y, et al. The platelet aggregation-inducing factor aggrus/podoplanin promotes pulmonary metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:1337–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Martin-Villar E, Megias D, Castel S, et al. Podoplanin binds ERM proteins to activate RhoA and promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:4541–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Scholl FG, Gamallo C, Quintanilla M. Ectopic expression of PA2.26 antigen in epidermal keratinocytes leads to destabilization of adherens junctions and malignant progression. Lab Invest. 2000;80:1749–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kato Y, Fujita N, Kunita A, et al. Molecular identification of Aggrus/T1alpha as a platelet aggregation-inducing factor expressed in colorectal tumors. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:51599–605.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Suzuki-Inoue K, Kato Y, Inoue O, et al. Involvement of the snake toxin receptor CLEC-2, in podoplanin-mediated platelet activation, by cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25993–6001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Suzuki-Inoue K. Essential in vivo roles of the platelet activation receptor CLEC-2 in tumour metastasis, lymphangiogenesis and thrombus formation. J Biochem. 2011;150:127–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Suzuki-Inoue K, Fuller GL, Garcia A, et al. A novel Syk-dependent mechanism of platelet activation by the C-type lectin receptor CLEC-2. Blood. 2006;107:542–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kato Y, Kaneko MK, Kuno A, et al. Inhibition of tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation using a novel anti-podoplanin antibody reacting with its platelet-aggregation-stimulating domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;349:1301–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao X, Pan Y, Ren W, et al. Plasma soluble podoplanin is a novel marker for the diagnosis of tumor occurrence and metastasis. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(2):403–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Qu L, Zhao X, Fu J, et al. Stable expression of recombinant human podoplanin in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;32:25–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Camerer E, Qazi AA, Duong DN, et al. Platelets, protease-activated receptors, and fibrinogen in hematogenous metastasis. Blood. 2004;104:397–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Malik AB. Pulmonary microembolism. Physiol Rev. 1983;63:1114–207.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Philippe C, Philippe B, Fouqueray B, Perez J, Lebret M, Baud L. Protection from tumor necrosis factor-mediated cytolysis by platelets. Am J Pathol. 1993;143(6):1713–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gay LJ, Felding-Habermann B. Contribution of platelets to tumour metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:123–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Klerk CP, Smorenburg SM, Otten HM, et al. The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2130–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Suzuki-Inoue K, Inoue O, Ding G, et al. Essential in vivo roles of the C-type lectin receptor CLEC-2: embryonic/neonatal lethality of CLEC-2-deficient mice by blood/lymphatic misconnections and impaired thrombus formation of CLEC-2-deficient platelets. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:24494–507.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Eichholtz T, Jalink K, Fahrenfort I, et al. The bioactive phospholipid lysophosphatidic acid is released from activated platelets. Biochem J. 1993;291 ( Pt 3:677–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Smyth SS, McEver RP, Weyrich AS, Morrell CN, Hoffman MR, Arepally GM, et al. Platelet functions beyond hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(11):1759–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Takagi S, Sato S, Oh-hara T, et al. Platelets promote tumor growth and metastasis via direct interaction between Aggrus/podoplanin and CLEC-2. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73609.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tajima S, Fukayama M. Possibility of D2-40 as a diagnostic and tumor differentiation-suggestive marker for some of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(8):9390–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Afzal MZ, Mabaera R, Shirai K. Metastatic uveal melanoma showing durable response to anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combination therapy after experiencing progression on anti-PD-1 therapy alone. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Huang R, Andersen LMK, Rofstad EK. Metastatic pathway and the microvascular and physicochemical microenvironments of human melanoma xenografts. J Transl Med. 2017;15:203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lee RJ, Gremel G, Marshall A, Myers KA, Fisher N, Dunn JA, et al. Circulating tumor DNA predicts survival in patients with resected high risk stage II/III melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(2):490–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Fei Shen and Miao Jiang for their help and support to this work.


This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873431, 31400692, 81520108005), Jiangsu province Natural Science Foundation (BK20181164). The funding of 81873431 and BK20181164 provided for the design of the study, collection, and analysis of data. The funding of 31400692 and 81520108005 provided for the interpretation of data and preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




The authors’ initials are used. LX and YZ contributed to the grant support, conception, design of this project, and critical revision of the manuscript. MX and XW contributed to performing experiments, obtaining tumor images, and revising the manuscript. XZ conducted the immunohistochemical technique. BY and CR contributed to the statistical critical analysis and data interpretation. YP contributed to critical interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiming Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Human venous blood was collected from healthy donors in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, which was also approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, M., Wang, X., Pan, Y. et al. Blocking podoplanin suppresses growth and pulmonary metastasis of human malignant melanoma. BMC Cancer 19, 599 (2019).

Download citation


  • Podoplanin
  • Antibody-based therapy
  • Malignant melanoma
  • Metastasis
  • Tumor growth