Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Deoxycholic acid induces the overexpression of intestinal mucin, MUC2, via NF-kB signaling pathway in human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells

†Contributed equally
BMC Cancer20088:333

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-333

©  Wu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 16 July 2008
  • Accepted: 13 November 2008
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Mucin alterations are a common feature of esophageal neoplasia, and alterations in MUC2 mucin have been associated with tumor progression in the esophagus. Bile acids have been linked to esophageal adenocarcinoma and mucin secretion, but their effects on mucin gene expression in human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells is unknown.

Methods

Human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells were treated 18 hours with 50–300 μM deoxycholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, or taurocholic acid. MUC2 transcription was assayed using a MUC2 promoter reporter luciferase construct and MUC2 protein was assayed by Western blot analysis. Transcription Nuclear factor-κB activity was measured using a Nuclear factor-κB reporter construct and confirmed by Western blot analysis for Nuclear factor-κB p65.

Results

MUC2 transcription and MUC2 protein expression were increased four to five fold by bile acids in a time and dose-dependent manner with no effect on cell viability. Nuclear factor-κB activity was also increased. Treatment with the putative chemopreventive agent aspirin, which decreased Nuclear factor-κB activity, also decreased MUC2 transcription. Nuclear factor-κB p65 siRNA decreased MUC2 transcription, confirming the significance of Nuclear factor-κB in MUC2 induction by deoxycholic acid. Calphostin C, a specific inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), greatly decreased bile acid induced MUC2 transcription and Nuclear factor-κB activity, whereas inhibitors of MAP kinase had no effect.

Conclusion

Deoxycholic acid induced MUC2 overexpression in human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells by activation of Nuclear factor-κB transcription through a process involving PKC-dependent but not PKA, independent of activation of MAP kinase.

Keywords

  • Bile Acid
  • Deoxycholic Acid
  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell
  • MUC2 Expression
  • MUC2 Promoter

Background

Changes in the characteristics of the surface epithelial mucins is the hallmark of Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of esophagus[1, 2]. MUC2, a high molecular weight glycoprotein, is the major secreted mucin in the large and small intestine[3, 4]. Human esophageal adenocarcinoma and cell lines derived from tumors can differ significantly in the amount of MUC2 mucin synthesized and these differences correlate with altered biochemical and biologic properties including those with relevance to invasion and metastasis, MUC2 is expressed in esophageal carcinoma cell lines, and patients with esophageal carcinomas characteristically present with advanced-stage disease[1, 5, 6].

Bile acids, fractions of duodenogastricoesophageal reflux (DGER) have been detected in patients with extensive esophageal mucosal damage, have been reported to promote esophageal carcinogenesis[7, 8]. These bile acids, primarily deoxycholic acid (DCA), are cytotoxic to esophageal cells[8], and are established tumor promoters in animal models[9]. In esophageal adenocarcinoma, DCA is believed to contribute to carcinogenesis during reflux where reluxates enter the lower esophagus[10]. Bile acids also have been reported to stimulate invasion and metastasis of esophageal carcinoma cells via activation of multiple signaling pathways [11–13]. Although regulations of MUC1 and MUC4 mucin genes by bile acids, such as DCA, CDCA and TCA, in human oesophageal cancer cells have been the thorough extensive study [14–16], the mechanisms responsible for regulation of MUC2 expression in the esophageal adenocarcinoma cells remain unknown.

In the current study, we sought to determine the effects of bile acids on MUC2 gene expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells and the molecular mechanisms involved. We find that bile acids induce MUC2 expression in human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells at the level of transcription through a process that involves protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent activation of Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), primarily a MAP kinase-independent.

Methods

Materials

Deoxycholic acid (DCA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and taurocholic acid (TCA) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, USA). CAPE, Calphostin C, U0126 (1,4-diamino-2, 3-dicyano-1,4-bis(2-aminophenylthio)butadiene), PD98059 (2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone), and H-8 (PKA inhibitor) (N-[2-(methylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide dihydrochloride) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Mouse monoclonal antibody (MoAb) CCP-58, specific for MUC2 glycoprotein, was obtained from Novocastra (Newcastle, UK). Antibodies for Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) p65, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), JNK, P38 and phospho-ERK1/2, JNK, P38 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA), aspirin, secondary antibodies and anti-beta-actin MoAb was obtained from Sigma (USA). FuGENE 6 transfection reagent was from Roche (Indianapolis, IN).

Cell Culture and Treatment

SEG-1 is a BE adenocarcinoma cell line, the cell line were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and 100 U/mL penicillin G and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide.

SEG-1 cells were plated in regular medium for 36 hours. The medium was then replaced with 0.5% FBS for an additional 24 hours. Cultures were then treated with bile acids. For inhibitor assays, SEG-1 cells were pretreated with inhibitors for 1 hour before exposure to DCA for an additional 18 hours. Calphostin C was used under a fluorescent lamp of 13 W located 15 cm above the plates.

For determining the effects of bile acids on viability, cells were treated for 24 hours with ≤ 200 μM DCA, CDCA, or TCA, then detected with The CellTiter-Fluor™ Assay kit(Promega BioSciences, San Luis Obispo, CA), according to the manufacturer's protocol

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Cellular proteins from treated SEG-1 cells were prepared in 40 mM Tris-HCI, pH 6.9, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2 mM orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, 1% Nonidert P40 (NP-40), 0.3 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mini tablet protein inhibitor (sigma, USA). Separate cytosol and nuclear protein lysates were prepared by using the Active Motif Nuclear Extract Kit (Active Motif Europe, Rixensart, Belgium), according to the manufacturer's protocol. For routine quantitation of proteins, following the manufacturer's protocol (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Equal amounts of protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on either 3–8% Tris-acetate gradient gels for MUC2 detection or 10% Tris-glycine gels for detection of other proteins. After gel electrophoresis and transfer to nitrocellulose, the membranes were stained in 0.5% Ponceau S with 1% acetic acid to confirm the equal loading and transfer efficiency. Membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight in a blocking solution containing 5% bovine skim milk and 0.1% Tween 20 (Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) in TBS (10 mM Tris-HCl with 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6), then probed with specific primary and secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by chemiluminescence solution and exposure to X-ray film.

RNA Isolation and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center Inc.), and 3 μg was primed with random hexamers and reverse transcribed using Superscript II (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 50 μl. One microliter of this mixture was PCR-amplified in a 10 μl reaction using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) with the addition of 5% dimethyl sulfoxide. Primers for MUC2 were (forward) 5'-TGC CTG GCC CTG TCT TTG-3' and (reverse) 5'-CAG CTC CAG CAT GAG TGC-3'; NF-κB p65 were (forward) 5'-GCG AGA GGA GCA CAG ATA CC-3' and (reverse) 5'-CTG ATA GCC TGC TCC AGG TC-3'. The PCR reaction mixture was denatured at 95°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles at 93°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Alternatively, blocked and unblocked primers for beta-actin (forward) 5'-ATC TGG CAC CAC ACC TTC TAC AAT GAG CTG C-3'; (reverse) 5'-CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT TGC TGA TCC ACA TCT G-3' were used to amplify this message as an internal control. All the primers were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). All PCR products were analysed by Gel-Pro analyser version 3.1 software.

Transient Transfection and Luciferase Reporter Assays

Plasmids were prepared using the Genopure plasmid midi kit from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). Methods to measure the MUC2 promoter activity with luciferase as a reporter have been reported previously [17–19]. Upstream fragments of 2665 base pair (bp) from immediately adjacent to the 5' translation start site of human MUC2 [GenBank accession number U67167] [17] were generated by routine polymerase chain reaction from human genomic DNA, using the following primer pairs (forward) 5'-GAGGCTAGCCCGGGCTTCCTGGTGAGTC-3', and (reverse) 5'-GAGCTCGAGCATGGTGGCTGGCAGGGGC-3'. The 2665-bp fragment was then inserted upstream of the luciferase reporter in the pGL3-basic vector, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Promega). DNA sequencing was performed to verify the correct clone.

NF-κB transient transfection assays have been reported previously[20, 21]. The cells were transfected using the SuperFect reagent (Qiagen) with a NF-kB luciferase reporter (Clontech) plasmid and a SV40 promoter-driven beta-galactosidase expression plasmid to normalize the transfection efficiency. After additional 24 h, the cells were harvested in phosphate-buffered saline, lysed in luciferase lysis buffer (Promega), and assayed for luciferase and beta-galactosidase activities using the Promega luciferase assay system (Promega).

For transient transfection, SEG-1 cells were seeded at a concentration of 6 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates. After overnight, the cells in each well were transfected with DNA (3 μg of MUC2 or NF-κB-luciferase reporter plasmid and 0.2 μg of pCH110) by using 3 μL of FuGENE6 (Roche) by following the manufacturer's protocol. After a 24-hour exposure to the transfection mixture, the cells were incubated in medium containing 10% FBS and different concentrations of bile acids or inhibitors for an additional 18 hours and then harvested for measurement of beta-galactosidase activity and luciferase activity. The latter was measured by using the Promega luciferase assay system according to the manufacturer's protocol using a TriStar LB941 (Berthold; Germany). Luciferase was normalized to the beta-galactosidase activity to account for differences in transfection efficiency.

NF-κB p65 siRNA Transfection

SignalSilence NF-κB p65 siRNA was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). siCONTROL nontargeting siRNA purchased from Dharmacon (Chicago, IL) was used as a control siRNA. Cells were transfected with siRNA using Oligofectamine transfection reagent (Invitrogen) for 72 h according to the manufacturer's instructions. To confirm the efficacy of NF-κB p65 siRNA, NF-κB p65 mRNA and protein were analyzed using RT-PCR and Western Blotting. The cytotoxic effect of NF-κB p65 siRNA on SEG-1 cells was determined by CellTiter-Fluor™ Assay (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical Analyses

Results were expressed as means ± SD, and statistical significance was determined using by ANOVA. Differences of P < 0.05 were considered significant. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Results

Effects of Bile Acids on MUC2 Expression and Transcription

SEG-1 treated with DCA, CDCA, and TCA. Viability of SEG-1 cells was not significantly affected by treatment for 24 hours with 200 μM DCA (data not shown). The addition of DCA in 50–300 μM for 18 hours to SEG-1 increased MUC2 protein expression in a dose-dependent manner with a maximum increase of approximately 4-fold (Fig. 1a). Different bile acids may have different biologic effects[22, 23]. To examine the effects of different bile acids on MUC2 induction, we treated SEG-1 with DCA, CDCA, and TCA for 18 hours at a concentration of 100 μM. As shown in Figure 1a, all three bile acids increased MUC2 protein expression, with DCA having the strongest effect.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Effect of bile acids on MUC2 expression. (a) SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with 50–300 μM DCA (left) or with 100 μM DCA, CDCA, or TCA (right). Total cellular protein was isolated and subjected to Western blotting for MUC2 and β-actin. (b) SEG-1 cells were transfected with MUC2 promoter luciferase construct, then treated for 18 hours with 50–300 μM DCA (left) or with 100 μM DCA, CDCA, or TCA (right). Luciferase activity for the MUC2 reporter was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. Values shown represent the means ± SD of triplicate experiments.

To determine whether bile acids increase MUC2 promoter activity, we employed an MUC2 promoter luciferase construct, which contains a 2205-bp human MUC2 5'-flanking region fused to a luciferase reporter gene. After transient transfection, cells were treated with different concentrations of bile acid and luciferase activities were determined (Fig. 1b). DCA induced MUC2 promoter-driven luciferase activities in a dose-dependent manner in SEG-1 cells, with a maximum 4–5 fold increase with 300 μM DCA. All tested bile acids induced MUC2 transcription activity to a varying extent at a concentration of 100 μM for 18 hours.

Effects of Bile Acids on NF-κB Expression and Transcription

We evaluated NF-κB p65 protein levels and gene transcription in the esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line. SEG-1 treated with DCA in 50–300 μM for 18 hours to SEG-1 increased NF-κB p65 protein expression in a dose dependent fashion with a maximum increase of approximately 5-fold (Fig. 2a).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Effect of bile acids on Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) expression. (a) SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with 50–300 μM DCA (left) or with 100 μM DCA, CDCA, or TCA (right). Cellular nuclear protein was subjected to Western blotting for NF-κB p65 and β-actin. (b) SEG-1 cells were transfected with the NF-κB luciferase reporter plasmid, incubated for 24 hours, then treated for an additional 18 hours with 50 – 300 μM DCA (left) or with 100 μM DCA, CDCA, or TCA (right). Luciferase activity for NF-κB reporter plasmid was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. Values shown represent the means ± SD of triplicate experiments.

To examine the effects of different bile acids on NF-κB induction, we treated SEG-1 with DCA, CDCA, and TCA for 18 hours at a concentration of 100 μM. As shown in Figure 2a, all three bile acids increased NF-κB p65 protein expression, with DCA having the strongest effect.

To determine whether bile acids increase NF-κB gene transcription, we employed a NF-κB promoter luciferase construct, luciferase reporter gene driven by the NF-κB promoter, was transiently transfected into SEG-1. After 24 hours, the transfected cells were treated with increasing doses of DCA and with different bile acids in 100 μM for 18 hours (Fig. 2b). DCA induced NF-κB promoter-driven luciferase activities in a dose dependent manner in SEG-1 cells, with a maximum 5–6 fold increase at a concentration of 300 μM. All tested bile acids induced NF-κB luciferase activities to a varying extent at a concentration of 100 μM for 18 hours, with DCA having the strongest effect (Fig. 2b), a result consistent with induction of MUC2 expression (Fig. 1b).

Requirement of NF-κB for Induction of MUC2 by DCA

Previous reports have suggested that NF-κB is important in mediating bile acids signaling[8, 24]. We therefore assessed the effect of NF-κB on expression of MUC2 induced by DCA in SEG-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. CAPE, an inhibitor of NF-κB activation, completely blocked the induction of MUC2 by DCA (Fig. 3). This result was confirmed using Western Blotting to estimate changes in protein levels (Fig. 3a) and RT-PCR in MUC2 and NF-κB p65 transcript levels (Fig. 3b). To determine whether CAPE blocked MUC2 promoter activity, we employed an MUC2 promoter luciferase construct, which contains a 2205-bp human MUC2 5'-flanking region fused to a luciferase reporter gene. After transient transfection, cells were treated with 100 μM DCA for 18 hours and luciferase activities were determined (Fig. 3c). CAPE inhibite MUC2 promoter-driven luciferase activities in SEG-1 cells treated with DCA.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Effect of CAPE on expression of MUC2. SEG-1 cells were pretreated with or without 10 μg/ml CAPE for 1 h and then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA. (a) Total cellular protein was subjected to Western blotting for MUC2 and β-actin. (b) The isolated RNA samples were analyzed by RT-PCR for MUC2, NF-κB p65 and β-actin. (c) SEG-1 cells were transfected with MUC2 promoter luciferase construct, then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of CAPE. Luciferase activity for MUC2 was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. (means ± SD of triplicate assays, * p < 0.05, for inhibition compared with assays without added inhibitor).

Whether NF-κB p65 involvement in DCA induced MUC2 activation, it was tested by transfection of NF-κB p65-specific siRNA into SEG-1 cells. Specific knockdown of endogenous NF-κB p65 mRNA levels was observed (Fig. 4a, b), and the cells treated with NF-κB p65 siRNA also showed potent suppression of DC-induced MUC2 activation detected with in MUC2 transcript levels and Western Blotting in protein levels (Fig. 4c). To determine whether NF-κB p65 siRNA blocked MUC2 gene transcription, we employed an MUC2 promoter luciferase construct. In NF-κB p65 siRNA SEG-1 cells, after transient transfection MUC2 promoter luciferase reporter, cells were treated with 100 μM DCA for 18 hours and luciferase activities were determined (Fig. 4c), NF-κB p65 siRNA inhibited MUC2 promoter-driven luciferase activities in SEG-1 cells treated with DCA. These results suggest that the activity of NF-κB p65 involved in DCA-induced activation of MUC2 in SEG-1 cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Effects of NF-κB p65 siRNA on expression of MUC2. SEG-1 cells were transfected with Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) p65 siRNA, and its effect on NF-κB p65 mRNA was analyzed using (a) RT-PCR, and (b) Western blotting. (c) Cells were treated with 100 μM DCA for 18 hours after exposure to siRNA targeting NF-κB p65, (Upper panel) SEG-1 cells lysates were analyzed in Western blotting for MUC2 and β-actin, (Middle panel) The isolated RNA samples were analyzed by RT-PCR for MUC2, NF-κB p65 and β-actin, (Lower panel) SEG-1 cells were transfected with human MUC2 promoter luciferase construct, then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA after with or without exposure to siRNA targeting NF-κB p65. Luciferase activity for MUC2 was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. (means ± SD of triplicate assays, * p < 0.05, for NF-κB p65 siRNA compared with assays without NF-κB p65 siRNA).

Although the precise mechanism by which aspirin inhibits esophageal tumorigenesis remains to be elucidated, it has been reported to inhibits NF-κB nuclear translocation in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line[25]. We examined the effect of aspirin, a potential chemopreventive agent in the prevention or treatment of esophageal cancer, on expression of MUC2 induced by DCA. In SEG-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells treated with DCA (100 μM) for 18 hours, the basal levels of MUC2 and NF-κB p65 proteins were decreased by treatment with 4 mmol/L aspirin, there was also partial inhibition of the bile acid-dependent induction of MUC2 and NF-κB p65 (Fig. 5a). In assays of MUC2 transcription and NF-κB transcriptional activity, aspirin also had effect on basal activity, and inhibited the bile acid-dependent induction of MUC2 and NF-κB activity (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Effect of aspirin on MUC2 and Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) p65 expression. (a) SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 4 mmol/L aspirin. Total cellular and nuclear protein were subjected to Western blotting for MUC2, NF-κB p65, and β-actin. (b) SEG-1 cells were transfected with human MUC2 promoter luciferase construct or NF-κB luciferase reporter plasmid, then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 4 mmol/L aspirin. Luciferase activity for MUC2 or NF-κB was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. Values shown represent the means ± SD of triplicate experiments.

Involvement of Protein Kinase C but Not Protein Kinase A in Induction of MUC2 by DCA

It has been reported that bile acids activate PKC in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells[10, 26]. Previous results have also shown that the PKC inducer PMA and bile acids increase MUC2 expression in colon carcinoma cell line, and that this is prevented by the PKC inhibitor, calphostin C[27, 28]. However, it is unclear whether induction of MUC2 by bile acids is mediated by PKC in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. When SEG-1 cells were treated with 6 nM calphostin C, there was almost complete inhibition of basal and bile acid-induced MUC2 protein and NF-κB p65 protein expression (Fig. 6a). This was accompanied by suppression of MUC2 transcription and of NF-κB transcriptional activity (Fig. 6b). These results indicate that PKC is involved in the NF-κB dependent induction of MUC2 expression by DCA.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Effect of calphostin C on MUC2 and NF-κB p65 expression. SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 5 nM calphostin C. (a) Total cellular and nuclear protein were subjected to Western blotting for MUC2, NF-κB p65, and β-actin. (b) SEG-1 cells were transfected with MUC2 promoter Luciferase construct or NF-κB Luciferase reporter plasmid, then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 5 nM calphostin C. Luciferase activity for MUC2 or NF-κB was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. (means ± SD of triplicate assays, * p < 0.05, for inhibition compared with assays without added inhibitor).

There has been reported that PKA is involved in bile acid induce MUC2 expression, and that this is prevented by the PKA inhibitor, H-8[28]. We also examined the effect on MUC2 induction by DCA of specific protein kinase inhibitor, H-8 (N-[2-(methylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide dihydrochloride). In our study, however, H-8 did not inhibited levels of MUC2 protein and NF-κB p65 protein both in the presence and absence of DCA in SEG-1 cells (Fig. 7a). There was also not a decrease in MUC2 transcription and in NF-κB transcriptional activity (Fig. 7b). These results suggest that the DCA-dependent induction of MUC2 depends on PKC but not PKA.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Effect of H-8 on MUC2 and NF-Kb p65 expression. (a) SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 5 μM H-8. Total cellular protein and nuclear protein were subjected to Western blotting for MUC2, NF-κB p65, and β-actin. (b) SEG-1 cells were transfected with the MUC2 promoter luciferase construct or the NF-κB luciferase reporter plasmid, then treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 5 μM H-8. Luciferase activity for MUC2 or NF-κB was measured and normalized to beta-galactosidase activity. Values shown represent the mean and standard error of the mean of triplicate experiments.

Induction of MUC2 by DCA is not dependent of MAPK

A previous study found that specific inhibitors of MAP kinase, U0126 and PD98059, inhibited the induction of MUC2 by bile acids[28]. To investigate the role of MAPK in the induction of MUC2 and NF-κB by DCA in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, we examined phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, P38 kinases and total ERK1/2, JNK, P38 kinases after treatment of SEG-1 cells with 100 μM DCA for 18 hours. The DCA had effect on the levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2, JNK, and P-38 or total ERK1/2, JNK, and P-38 kinases (Fig. 8). To further investigate the effection of MAPK on the induction of MUC2 and NF-κB, we used U0126 and PD98059 to selectively block the activity of MAPK, we found that these inhibitors did not block the DCA-dependent increase in MUC2 protein and NF-κB protein, although both U0126 and PD98059 did suppress phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and P38. These results suggest that expression of MUC2 and NF-κB treated with DCA is not dependent on MAPK in SEG-1.
Figure 8
Figure 8

Effect of U0126 and PD98059 on MUC2 and NF-κB p65 expression. SEG-1 cells were treated for 18 hours with or without 100 μM DCA in the presence or absence of 8 μM U0126 and 60 μM PD98059. Total cellular and nuclear protein were subjected to Western blotting for MUC2, NF-κB p65, phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, P-38, and total ERK1/2, JNK, P-38 and β-actin.

Discussion

The effects of bile acids on mucin gene expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells have not been well studied. Bile acids has been reported to increase the secretion of MUC2 in esophageal cells[29], but MUC2 gene expression and the molecular events responsible for MUC2 gene expression were not studied in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. In the current study, we find that bile acids increase MUC2 expression in SEG-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, and the transcriptional activity of MUC2 promoter reporter construct transiently transfected into SEG-1 was increased by DCA and other bile acids in a dose-dependent fashion, indicating that bile acid-induced MUC2 up-regulation occurs at the transcriptional level.

NF-κB is an important transcription factor that mediates expression of multiple genes in important biologic processes including cell growth, apoptosis, and transformation [30–32]. We postulated that NF-κB could play a role in the induction of MUC2 by bile acids. Our data indicate that CAPE, an inhibitor of NF-κB translocation, it reduced endogenous as well as bile acid up-regulated MUC2 transcription, in addition NF-κB expression and transcription activity coincided with MUC2 induction, and inhibition of NF-κB expression and activity efficiently suppressed bile acid-mediated up-regulation of MUC2, indicating that NF-κB is involved in MUC2 transcription induced by bile acid. Furthermore, it is confirmed by NF-κB p65 siRNA can also blocked MUC2 expression induced by bile acid. Activation of NF-κB is mediated through phosphorylation, ubiquination, and subsequent degradation of inhibitor IκB, this enables the free NF-κB p65 to translocate to the nucleus and activate target genes[33]. Our study shows that NF-κB p65 expression can be induced by DCA, suggesting degradation of inhibitor IκB may be involved in this pathway. Previous studies have indicated that NF-κB is involved in expression of MUC2[34, 35], as the transcriptional competence of the NF-κB cis element was demonstrated containing the same region of the MUC2 promoter from bases ~1528 to ~1307 [27], implicating MUC2 promoter may be activated via expression of NF-κB induced by bile acids. Other transcription factors that have been shown to regulate MUC2 expression in other contexts include SP-1, CDX-2, and GATA-5 [36–38]. It is likely that these transcription factors activities may be also required for MUC2 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, but this has not yet been established.

The transcriptional activity of NF-κB is also enhanced directly by phosphorylation at various sites on its subunits. The kinases responsible for these phosphorylations may include PKA, and PKC. Activation of PKC by bile acids is well documented, and may be one mechanism of bile acid induced carcinogenesis [10, 26]. We found that the PKC inhibitor calphostin C strongly blocked NF-κB and MUC2 induction by DCA, indicating that PKC is involved in the bile acid-dependent induction of MUC2. PKA has been reported that it is involved in bile acids stimulate MUC2 expression, although the bile acid-dependent induction of MUC2 depends less on PKA than on PKC[28]. However, our data indicated that the protein kinase A inhibitor, H-8, is not effective in blocking bile acid dependent induction of MUC2 and NF-κB, suggesting expression of MUC2 induced by DCA independent on PKA. In contrast to previous work on MUC2 induction by PMA via the ERK cascade, we find that the induction of MUC2 by bile acid is independent of MAP kinases in SEG-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. Although treatment with DCA did affect the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and P38 Kinase, U0126 and PD5089, inhibitors of MAP kinase, did not block MUC2 and NF-κB induction by DCA in SEG-1 cells, indicating MUC2 induction by DCA independent on the MAPK cascade.

Conclusion

We conclude that treatment of human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells with DCA, up regulates MUC2 transcription by activation of NF-κB via PKC but not PKA, independent of MAP kinase. The biologic consequences of the induction of MUC2 expression by bile acids are unclear. Further studies are needed to confirm that whether induction of MUC2 by bile acids can increase the invasion potential of cells and their metastatic potential in vitro and in vivo. A more detailed understanding of the precise mechanisms by which bile acids induce MUC2 could also facilitate the development of chemopreventive strategies to diminish the risk of carcinogenesis and metastasis, particularly in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Professor Lei Dong for his expert help in reviewing the manuscript and Dr. FuQuan Huo, Dr. WenBin Li, Dr. Wei Zhang for generous support of this project and RuiHong Zhang and MinGe Li for technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, P.R. China

References

  1. Chinyama CN, Marshall RE, Owen WJ, Mason RC, Kothari D, Wilkinson ML, Sanderson JD: Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 mucin gene products in Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma: an immunopathological study with clinical correlation. Histopathology. 1999, 35 (6): 517-524. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00791.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pera M, Pera M, de Bolos C, Brito MJ, Palacin A, Grande L, Cardesa A, Poulsom R: Duodenal-content reflux into the esophagus leads to expression of Cdx2 and Muc2 in areas of squamous epithelium in rats. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007, 11 (7): 869-874. 10.1007/s11605-007-0162-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tytgat KM, Buller HA, Opdam FJ, Kim YS, Einerhand AW, Dekker J: Biosynthesis of human colonic mucin: Muc2 is the prominent secretory mucin. Gastroenterology. 1994, 107 (5): 1352-1363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen A, Hutton DA, Pearson JP: The MUC2 gene product: a human intestinal mucin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1998, 30 (7): 797-801. 10.1016/S1357-2725(98)00028-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Warson C, Bovenkamp Van De JH, Korteland-Van Mal AM, Buller HA, Einerhand AW, Ectors NL, Dekker J: Barrett's esophagus is characterized by expression of gastric-type mucins (MUC5AC, MUC6) and TFF peptides (TFF1 and TFF2), but the risk of carcinoma development may be indicated by the intestinal-type mucin, MUC2. Hum Pathol. 2002, 33 (6): 660-668. 10.1053/hupa.2002.124907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Guillem P, Billeret V, Buisine MP, Flejou JF, Lecomte-Houcke M, Degand P, Aubert JP, Triboulet JP, Porchet N: Mucin gene expression and cell differentiation in human normal, premalignant and malignant esophagus. International journal of cancer. 2000, 88 (6): 856-861. 10.1002/1097-0215(20001215)88:6<856::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yen C-J, Izzo JG, Lee D-F, Guha S, Wei Y, Wu T-T, Chen C-T, Kuo H-P, Hsu J-M, Sun H-L, et al: Bile Acid Exposure Up-regulates Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 1/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway in Barrett's-Associated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (8): 2632-2640. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5460.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins GJS, Cronin J, Alhamdani A, Rawat N, D'Souza F, Thomas T, Eltahir Z, Griffiths AP, Baxter JN: The bile acid deoxycholic acid has a non-linear dose response for DNA damage and possibly NF-{kappa}B activation in oesophageal cells, with a mechanism of action involving ROS. Mutagenesis. 2008, 23 (5): 399-405. 10.1093/mutage/gen029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen KH, Mukaisho K, Sugihara H, Araki Y, Yamamoto G, Hattori T: High animal-fat intake changes the bile-acid composition of bile juice and enhances the development of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in a rat duodenal-contents reflux model. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98 (11): 1683-1688. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00605.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Song S, Guha S, Liu K, Buttar NS, Bresalier RS: COX-2 induction by unconjugated bile acids involves reactive oxygen species-mediated signalling pathways in Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2007, 56 (11): 1512-1521. 10.1136/gut.2007.121244.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Xia HH-X, Zhang ST, Lam SK, Lin MC-M, Kung HF, Wong BC-Y: Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and effects of bile acids and NSAIDs. Carcinogenesis. 2005, 26 (1): 11-15. 10.1093/carcin/bgh279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kazumori H, Ishihara S, Rumi MAK, Kadowaki Y, Kinoshita Y: Bile acids directly augment caudal related homeobox gene Cdx2 expression in oesophageal keratinocytes in Barrett's epithelium. Gut. 2006, 55 (1): 16-25. 10.1136/gut.2005.066209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Roman S, Petre A, Thepot A, Hautefeuille A, Scoazec J-Y, Mion F, Hainaut P: Downregulation of p63 upon exposure to bile salts and acid in normal and cancer esophageal cells in culture. American journal of physiology. 2007, 293 (1): G45-53. 10.1152/ajpcell.00450.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mariette C, Perrais M, Leteurtre E, Jonckheere N, Hemon B, Pigny P, Batra S, Aubert JP, Triboulet JP, Van Seuningen I: Transcriptional regulation of human mucin MUC4 by bile acids in oesophageal cancer cells is promoter-dependent and involves activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signalling pathway. The Biochemical journal. 2004, 377 (Pt 3): 701-708.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Piessen G, Jonckheere N, Vincent A, Hemon B, Ducourouble MP, Copin MC, Mariette C, Van Seuningen I: Regulation of the human mucin MUC4 by taurodeoxycholic and taurochenodeoxycholic bile acids in oesophageal cancer cells is mediated by hepatocyte nuclear factor 1alpha. The Biochemical journal. 2007, 402 (1): 81-91. 10.1042/BJ20061461.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mariette C, Piessen G, Leteurtre E, Hemon B, Triboulet JP, Van Seuningen I: Activation of MUC1 mucin expression by bile acids in human esophageal adenocarcinomatous cells and tissues is mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Surgery. 2008, 143 (1): 58-71. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gum JR, Hicks JW, Kim YS: Identification and characterization of the MUC2 (human intestinal mucin) gene 5'-flanking region: promoter activity in cultured cells. The Biochemical journal. 1997, 325 (Pt 1): 259-267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray T, Nettesheim P, Basbaum C, Koo J: Regulation of mucin gene expression in human tracheobronchial epithelial cells by thyroid hormone. The Biochemical journal. 2001, 353 (Pt 3): 727-734. 10.1042/0264-6021:3530727.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Mesquita P, Jonckheere N, Almeida R, Ducourouble M-P, Serpa J, Silva E, Pigny P, Silva FS, Reis C, Silberg D, et al: Human MUC2 Mucin Gene Is Transcriptionally Regulated by Cdx Homeodomain Proteins in Gastrointestinal Carcinoma Cell Lines. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (51): 51549-51556. 10.1074/jbc.M309019200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwenzer R, Siemienski K, Liptay S, Schubert G, Peters N, Scheurich P, Schmid RM, Wajant H: The Human Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor-associated Factor 1 Gene (TRAF1) Is Up-regulated by Cytokines of the TNF Ligand Family and Modulates TNF-induced Activation of NF-kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal Kinase. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (27): 19368-19374. 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wajant H, Haas E, Schwenzer R, Muhlenbeck F, Kreuz S, Schubert G, Grell M, Smith C, Scheurich P: Inhibition of Death Receptor-mediated Gene Induction by a Cycloheximide-sensitive Factor Occurs at the Level of or Upstream of Fas-associated Death Domain Protein (FADD). J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (32): 24357-24366. 10.1074/jbc.M000811200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahmoud NN, Dannenberg AJ, Bilinski RT, Mestre JR, Chadburn A, Churchill M, Martucci C, Bertagnolli MM: Administration of an unconjugated bile acid increases duodenal tumors in a murine model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Carcinogenesis. 1999, 20 (2): 299-303. 10.1093/carcin/20.2.299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wali RK, Khare S, Tretiakova M, Cohen G, Nguyen L, Hart J, Wang J, Wen M, Ramaswamy A, Joseph L, et al: Ursodeoxycholic Acid and F6-D3 Inhibit Aberrant Crypt Proliferation in the Rat Azoxymethane Model of Colon Cancer: Roles of Cyclin D1 and E-Cadherin. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002, 11 (12): 1653-1662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins GJS, Harries K, Doak SH, Wilmes A, Griffiths AP, Baxter JN, Parry JM: The bile acid deoxycholic acid (DCA) at neutral pH activates NF-{kappa}B and induces IL-8 expression in oesophageal cells in vitro. Carcinogenesis. 2004, 25 (3): 317-323. 10.1093/carcin/bgh032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Jun-Feng, GGJPADG-JZS-WZT-NZB-ESQ-ZW: Aspirin induces apoptosis in oesophageal cancer cells by inhibiting the pathway of NF-kappaB downstream regulation of cyclooxygenase-2. ANZ journal of surgery. 2005, 75 (11): 1011-1016. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03596.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaur BS, Triadafilopoulos G: Acid- and bile-induced PGE2 release and hyperproliferation in Barrett's esophagus are COX-2 and PKC-epsilon dependent. American journal of physiology. 2002, 283 (2): G327-334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee H-W, Ahn D-H, Crawley SC, Li J-D, Gum JR, Basbaum CB, Fan NQ, Szymkowski DE, Han S-Y, Lee BH, et al: Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate Up-regulates the Transcription of MUC2 Intestinal Mucin via Ras, ERK, and NF-kappa B. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (36): 32624-32631. 10.1074/jbc.M200353200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Song S, Byrd JC, Koo JS, Bresalier RS: Bile acids induce MUC2 overexpression in human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer. 2005, 103 (8): 1606-1614. 10.1002/cncr.21015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu Y, Jones C, Gellersen O, Williams VA, Watson TJ, Peters JH: Pathogenesis of Barrett Esophagus: Deoxycholic Acid Up-Regulates Goblet-Specific Gene MUC2 in Concert With CDX2 in Human Esophageal Cells. Arch Surg. 2007, 142 (6): 540-545. 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Li B, Cheung PY, Wang X, Tsao SW, Ling MT, Wong YC, Cheung ALM: Id-1 activation of PI3K/Akt/NF{kappa}B signaling pathway and its significance in promoting survival of esophageal cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2007, 28 (11): 2313-2320. 10.1093/carcin/bgm152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li J, Minnich DJ, Camp ER, Brank A, Mackay SL, Hochwald SN: Enhanced sensitivity to chemotherapy in esophageal cancer through inhibition of NF-kappaB. The Journal of surgical research. 2006, 132 (1): 112-120. 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Abdel-Latif MM, O'Riordan J, Windle HJ, Carton E, Ravi N, Kelleher D, Reynolds JV: NF-kappaB activation in esophageal adenocarcinoma: relationship to Barrett's metaplasia, survival, and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Annals of surgery. 2004, 239 (4): 491-500. 10.1097/01.sla.0000118751.95179.c6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Karin M, Ben-Neriah Y: Phosphorylation Meets Ubiquitination: The Control of NF-κB Activity. Annual Review of Immunology. 2000, 18 (1): 621-663. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Azzaroli F, Mehal W, Soroka CJ, Wang L, Lee J, Crispe N, Boyer JL: Ursodeoxycholic acid diminishes Fas-ligand-induced apoptosis in mouse hepatocytes. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2002, 36 (1): 49-54. 10.1053/jhep.2002.34511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ahn DH, Crawley SC, Hokari R, Kato S, Yang SC, Li JD, Kim YS: TNF-alpha activates MUC2 transcription via NF-kappaB but inhibits via JNK activation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2005, 15 (1–4): 29-40. 10.1159/000083636.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Perrais M, Pigny P, Copin M-C, Aubert J-P, Van Seuningen I: Induction of MUC2 and MUC5AC Mucins by Factors of the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Family Is Mediated by EGF Receptor/Ras/Raf/Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Cascade and Sp1*. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (35): 32258-32267. 10.1074/jbc.M204862200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamamoto H, Bai YQ, Yuasa Y: Homeodomain protein CDX2 regulates goblet-specific MUC2 gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 300 (4): 813-818. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02935-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ren CY, Akiyama Y, Miyake S, Yuasa Y: Transcription factor GATA-5 selectively up-regulates mucin gene expression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004, 130 (5): 245-252. 10.1007/s00432-003-0537-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/333/prepub

Copyright

© Wu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us