Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

MYBBP1A suppresses breast cancer tumorigenesis by enhancing the p53 dependent anoikis

  • Kensuke Akaogi†1,
  • Wakana Ono†1,
  • Yuki Hayashi1,
  • Hiroyuki Kishimoto1, 2 and
  • Junn Yanagisawa1, 2Email author
†Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201313:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-65

©  Akaogi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 15 October 2012

Accepted: 30 January 2013

Published: 7 February 2013

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in a wide variety of human cancers and plays a critical role in anoikis, which is essential for preventing tumorigenesis. Recently, we found that a nucleolar protein, Myb-binding protein 1a (MYBBP1A), was involved in p53 activation. However, the function of MYBBP1A in cancer prevention has not been elucidated.

Methods

Relationships between MYBBP1A expression levels and breast cancer progression were examined using patient microarray databases and tissue microarrays. Colony formation, xenograft, and anoikis assays were conducted using cells in which MYBBP1A was either knocked down or overexpressed. p53 activation and interactions between p53 and MYBBP1A were assessed by immunoprecipitation and western blot.

Results

MYBBP1A expression was negatively correlated with breast cancer tumorigenesis. In vivo and in vitro experiments using the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and ZR-75-1, which expresses wild type p53, showed that tumorigenesis, colony formation, and anoikis resistance were significantly enhanced by MYBBP1A knockdown. We also found that MYBBP1A binds to p53 and enhances p53 target gene transcription under anoikis conditions.

Conclusions

These results suggest that MYBBP1A is required for p53 activation during anoikis; therefore, it is involved in suppressing colony formation and the tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Collectively, our results suggest that MYBBP1A plays a role in tumor prevention in the context of p53 activation.

Keywords

Breast cancer Tumorigenesis Anoikis p53 MYBBP1A

Background

Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in women worldwide. It has been estimated that more than 1.6 million new cases of breast cancer occurred in 2010 [1]. Cancer cells develop features that are fundamentally different from those of normal cells. One hallmark of cancer cells is their ability to survive and proliferate in the absence of extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived signals [2].

The tumor suppressor p53 plays a central role in coordinating the responses to stresses induced by a wide array of stimuli. Under normal conditions, cellular p53 protein levels are maintained at basal levels. However, in response to genotoxic stresses, such as exposure to ultraviolet light or γ-irradiation, p53 protein levels increase and trigger either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis [3]. p53 plays a critical role in cancer prevention, because p53 can suppress tumorigenesis by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through its transcriptional activity. p53 is one of the tumor suppressor genes that is most frequently found to be inactivated in cancer [4].

p53 also plays a critical role in anoikis. Anoikis, defined as detachment-induced apoptosis [5], reflects the essential requirement of most normal epithelial cells for ECM-derived survival signals [6]. When these signals are denied, for example, upon detachment and continued culture in suspension or in soft agar, cells will rapidly undergo cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The capacity of cancer cells for anchorage-independent growth under conditions of detachment and suspension in soft agar correlates well with their tumorigenic potential [2].

p53 is required for anoikis in many cell types [7], including epithelial cells [8–12]. Under detached conditions, p53 enhances p21, Bax, and PUMA transcription and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [9, 11]. However, the signaling pathways that regulate p53-dependent anoikis are largely unknown.

Recently, we found that a nucleolar protein, Myb-binding protein 1a (MYBBP1A), was involved in p53 activation. When cells were exposed to cellular stresses, MYBBP1A translocated from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. The translocated MYBBP1A promoted p53 acetylation and accumulation by facilitating the interaction between p53 and histone acetyltransferase p300; thus, MYBBP1A could enhance p53 target gene transcription [13]. Previous studies revealed that MYBBP1A was involved in regulating intracellular energy status, inflammation, and myogenesis [14–16]. In addition, Sanhueza et al. recently reported that MYBBP1A regulates the proliferation and migration of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells [17]. However, the role of MYBBP1A in breast cancer prevention and the detailed mechanisms underlying these activities have not been determined.

In this study, we show that MYBBP1A expression is associated with breast cancer tumorigenesis through an extensive analysis of the Oncomine database. In vitro and in vivo experiments using the breast cancer cell lines, which expresses wild type p53, revealed that tumorigenesis, colony formation, and anoikis resistance were significantly enhanced by MYBBP1A knockdown. MYBBP1A binds to p53 under detached conditions and enhances p53 target gene transcription, as evidenced by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and RT-qPCR. These results suggest the physiological significance of MYBBP1A in p53 activation and cancer prevention.

Methods

Cell culture and transfection

MCF-10A, human mammary epithelial cells, were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-F12 (DMEM-F12) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), 10 μg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and 20 ng/ml recombinant human EGF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine LTX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Expression vectors and antibodies

cDNAs encoding full-length p53 and MYBBP1A were amplified using PCR and subcloned into pcDNA3 plasmids (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and pQCXIP (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) containing sequences encoding FLAG sequences. Anti-β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and anti-human-p53 (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) monoclonal antibodies and rabbit anti-p53-K382Ac(Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) polyclonal antibody were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Rabbit anti-human MYBBP1A antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 1265–1328 of human MYBBP1A.

Oncomine analysis

The Oncomine database and gene microarray analysis tool, a repository for published complementary DNA microarray data [18, 19], were explored (July 2012) for MYBBP1A mRNA expression in non-neoplastic and breast cancer tissues. Statistical analysis of the differences in MYBBP1A expression between these tissues used Oncomine algorithms, which provided multiple comparisons among different studies [20–22]. Data sets obtained from TCGA Breast, Finak Breast, and Richardson Breast 2 included various stage, and all cancer samples were invasive.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Human breast cancer tissue microarrays were purchased from SuperBioChips Laboratories (Seoul, Korea) included various stages, and all cancer samples were invasive. Formalin-fixed tissues were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in alcohol. For antigen retrieval, the sections were subsequently heated in EDTA buffer (1 mM, pH 8.0) in a microwave oven for 5 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was suppressed using a solution of 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 6 min. The samples were stained with avidin–biotin–peroxidase complexes using a Histofine SAB-PO Immunohistochemical Staining Kit (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rabbit anti-MYBBP1A antibody was used at a dilution of 1:50.

RNA interference

Methods for stable RNA interference followed those described by Kajiro et al.[23]. To generate a shRNA retroviral supernatant, GP2-293 cells (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) were co-transfected with a p10A1 vector encoding an envelope protein and pRETRO-SUPER (Oligo Engine, Seattle, WA) vector containing either the MYBBP1A or luciferase (control) target sequence. MCF-7 cells were incubated with the retroviral supernatant in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. Infected cells were selected using 1 μg/ml of puromycin. The target sequences were 5′- TTCAGGGCATATTTCATCTCGGACC-3′ for MYBB1A #1, 5′-TTCAGGGCATATTTCATCTCGGACC-3′ for MYBBP1A #2, and 5′-GAAGCTGCGCGGTGGTGTTGT-3′ for luciferase. For siRNA transfection, cells at 30%–50% confluency were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAi MAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All siRNAs were purchased from Invitrogen. The siRNA duplexes were MYBBP1A, 5′-UCUUUCAGUCAGGUCGGCUGGUGAA-3′ and p53, 5′-CCAGUGGUAAUCUACUGGGACGGAA-3′. Stealth RNAi negative control was used as a negative control.

Tumor xenograft models

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. The tumor xenograft models have been described previously [23]. Each mouse was subcutaneously injected with 100 μl of cell suspension (5 × 106) in both flanks. At the time points indicated in the figures, the tumors were excised, weighed, and fixed or stored in liquid nitrogen.

Soft agar colony-formation assay

For soft agar assays, 22,000 cells were mixed with 1 ml of 0.35% top agar and plated onto a 35-mm six-well plate containing bottom plugs (0.6% agar, 10% FBS, 1× DMEM). After the top agar had solidified (about 2 h at 37°C), 200 μl of DMEM was added into each well to prevent dehydration. This covering medium was changed every 2 or 3 days during culture. After allowing growth for 2 weeks at 37°C, colonies with a diameter of >100 μm were counted.

Anoikis assay

MCF-10A cells were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well in six-well plates in an ultra-low attachment culture dish (Corning, Tewksbury, MA) and maintained in DMEM-F12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), 10 μg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and 20 ng/ml recombinant human EGF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). MCF-7 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well in DMEM with 5% FBS. ZR-75-1 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS. All media were supplemented with 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Before analysis, the samples were treated with trypsin to disperse the cells. Cell viability after detachment was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion. Viable cells were determined by MTT assay using an MTT cell counting kit (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Apoptotic cell proportion was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using PI and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Annexin V (MBL, Tokyo, Japan) staining.

Real-time RT-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR was performed as described previously [24]. Cells were homogenized in 1 ml Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan), and the total RNA was extracted according to the instruction manual. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using ReverTra Ace reverse transcriptase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and oligo dT primers. Real-time PCR was used to amplify fragments representing the indicated mRNA expressions. The primer sequences used were as follows:

GAPDH fw primer: 5′- GTATGACTCCACTCACGGCAAA -3′

GAPDH rv primer: 5′-GGTCTCGCTCCTGGAAGATG-3′

p21 fw primer: 5′-GGAGACTCTCAGGGTCGAAA-3′

p21 rv primer: 5′-TTAGGGCTTCCTCTTGGAGA-3′

Bax fw primer: 5′-AGCAAACTGGTGCTCAAGG -3′

Bax rw primer: 5′-CTTGGATCCAGCCCAACAG -3′

PUMA fw primer: 5′-GGGCCCAGACTGTGAATCCT-3′

PUMA rv primer: 5′-ACGTGCTCTCTCTAAACCTATGCA-3′

Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in TNE buffer [10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.8), 1% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 g/ml aprotinin]. The extracted proteins were immunoprecipitated with antibody-coated protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Bound proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Temecula, CA), and detected with appropriate primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Specific proteins were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blot detection system (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and real-time PCR detection

ChIP assay was performed according to the published procedures [24]. The primers for real-time PCR were as follows: forward, TAATCCCAGCGCTTTGGAAG; reverse, TTGCTAGATCCAGGTCTCTGCA for the upstream region of the Bax gene.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min. After rinsing twice with PBS, the cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and later blocked with TBS-T buffer containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with anti-MYBBP1A and anti-p53 antibodies for 1 h, stained with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 h, and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Immunofluorescent images were obtained by Biozero immunofluorescence microscopy (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).

Results

MYBBP1A expression decreases as breast cancer carcinogenesis progresses

We previously reported that MYBBBP1A was involved in activating p53 function. Therefore, we assumed that MYBBP1A would have a cancer prevention function via p53. To examine the relationship between MYBBP1A expression and breast cancer progression, we examined the MYBBP1A expression profiles in breast carcinomas compared to those of normal tissue using the Oncomine database, which provides publicly available datasets of gene expression in cancer. Of the 12 datasets, 11 contained gene chip profiles classified as normal or breast carcinoma tissues, which indicated that MYBBP1A mRNA levels were significantly lower in breast carcinomas than in normal tissues. Three representative results from independent datasets characterized by large population sizes are shown in Figure 1 (MYBBP1A expression levels in normal vs. breast carcinoma; P = 2.95E-25, 2.10E-6, and 7.17E-4). Next, we used IHC to assess MYBBP1A expression in non-neoplastic and breast cancer tissues using a human breast cancer tissue microarray. As shown in Figure 1B, MYBBP1A expression was significantly decreased in the breast cancer tumors. To confirm these results, we compared MYBBP1A protein levels in MCF-10A, MCF-7, and ZR-75-1 cells. The MYBBP1A protein levels were much lower in MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells, the cancer cell lines derived from human breast cancer cells, than in MCF-10A cells, a normal breast tissue cell line (Figure 1C). These results suggested that MYBBP1A had an inhibitory effect on carcinogenesis in these cancer patients.
Figure 1

MYBBP1A expression decreases as breast cancer carcinogenesis progresses. (A) Decreased expression of MYBBP1A mRNA in breast carcinomas from three independent datasets for human breast cancers. Data and statistics were obtained from the Oncomine database [20–22, 25]. (B) Decreased MYBBP1A protein expression in carcinoma samples of breast cancer patients. IHC was used to examine MYBBP1A expression in TMAs and compare it with that of human normal breast tissues and human breast cancer tissues. Counterstaining used hematoxylin. Representatives of normal breast tissue (1 and 2) and breast carcinoma tissue (3 to 6) are shown. Sample 3 is an infiltrating duct carcinoma of T2N1aM0, sample 4 is an infiltrating duct carcinoma of T3N2aM0, sample 5 is an infiltrating duct carcinoma of T2N0M0, and sample 6 is an infiltrating duct carcinoma of T2N0M0. The areas within the black squares are enlarged and shown in the right-side panels. Black scale bars = 0.5 mm and white scale bars = 100 μm. (C) MYBBP1A protein expression levels in MCF-10A, MCF-7, and ZR-75-1 cells. MYBBP1A protein levels in the cells were determined by immunoblottin.

MYBBP1A suppresses colony formation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo

To investigate a possible relationship between MYBBP1A and breast cancer cell growth, we generated MCF-7 cells that had stably knocked down or overexpressed MYBBP1A (Figure 2A and 2B). MCF-7 is a breast cancer cell line that expresses wild type p53. As shown in Figure 2C, the colony numbers in soft agar were markedly increased when using MYBBP1A knockdown cells (shMYBBP1A #1 and shMYBBP1A sh#2). Conversely, MYBBP1A overexpression decreased the number of these colonies (Figure 2C: OE MYBBP1A).
Figure 2

MYBBP1A suppresses colony formation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo.(A) and (B) Efficiency of MYBBP1A knockdown and overexpression in MCF-7 cells. (A) western blot with anti-MYBBP1A antibody was used to detect MYBBP1A protein in MCF-7 cells that stably expressed shRNA for MYBBP1A (shMYBBP1A #1 and shMYBBP1A #2), cells that expressed Luciferase shRNA (shControl), cells that stably overexpressed MYBBP1A (OE MYBBP1A), and EGFP (OE Control). (B) MYBBP1A mRNA in these cells was quantified by RT–qPCR. (C) Effects of MYBBP1A expression on colony formation. Number of colonies per dish (area = 9.4 cm2) are shown. (D) Tumor growth curves in nude mice that were inoculated with either shControl, shMYBBP1A #1, OE Control, or OE MYBBP1A MCF‐7 cells. Nude mice received bilateral subcutaneous injections of control or cells. Tumor volume is presented as the mean ± s.d. (n = 10) for 5 mice in each group. (E) and (F) Increased or decreased tumor weight in mice injected with shMYBBP1A #1 or OE MYBBP1A cells. Photographs of mice (E) and tumors (F, right panels) are shown. Scale bars = 10 mm. Tumor weights after 49 days are shown in F, left panel. Bars = mean + s.d. (n = 10).

Next, we performed xenograft experiments to test the effect of MYBBP1A expression on tumorigenicity in vivo. MYBBP1A knockdown cells formed tumors that were significantly larger than those of control cells. In contrast, MYBBP1A overexpressing cells formed smaller tumors than control cells (Figure 2D, 2E, and 2F). These results indicated that MYBBP1A could suppress breast cancer tumor growth.

MYBBP1A induces anoikis in a p53-dependent manner

To examine how MYBBP1A could suppress tumor formation we focused on anoikis, because p53 plays a critical role in anoikis [7–12]. Thus, we examined whether MYBBP1A was involved in anoikis in the context of the p53 pathway. MCF-10A mammary epithelial cells were transfected with sip53 or siMYBBP1A and cultured in non-adherent plates for 24 h. The number of viable cells under detached conditions increased with p53 or MYBBP1A knockdown (Figure 3A). MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells were also cultured under detached conditions. The number of viable cells increased with p53 knockdown, while they decreased when p53 was overexpressed. Similarly, MYBBP1A knockdown increased and MYBBP1A overexpression decreased the numbers of viable cells under detached conditions (Figure 3B and 3C). These results indicated that MYBBP1A was involved in anoikis in breast tissues.
Figure 3

MYBBP1A induces anoikis in normal breast and breast cancer cells. (A) MYBBP1A induces anoikis in mammary epithelial cells. MCF-10A cells were transfected with siRNA for p53 or MYBBP1A; 48 h later, anoikis assay was performed. These cells were cultured under suspension conditions for 24 h, and viable cell numbers were determined by trypan blue dye exclusion or MTT assay. Protein levels of MYBBP1A and p53 in the cells were determined by immunoblotting. (B) and (C) MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells were transfected with siRNA for 48 h, followed by anoikis assay, or expressed a plasmid for p53 or MYBBP1A for 24 h followed by anoikis assay. These cells were cultured under suspension conditions for 24 h, and viable cell numbers were counted or assessed by MTT assay. Protein levels of MYBBP1A and p53 in these cells were determined by immunoblotting. Bars = mean + s.d. (n = 3).

To confirm that MYBBP1A was involved in anoikis in context of p53 activation, we tested the combination of p53 knockdown and MYBBP1A overexpression in anoikis assay using MCF-7 cells (Figure 4A). Based on previous results (Figure 3B), MYBBP1A overexpression decreased the number of viable cells (compare lanes 1 and 2 in Figure 4A). However, MYBBP1A overexpression in p53 knocked-down cells did not show any significant effects (compare lanes 3 and 4 in Figure 4A). Similar results were obtained in ZR-75-1 cells (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

MYBBP1A induces anoikis in a p53-dependent manner. (A) and (B) p53 is required for MYBBP1A-induced anoikis. As indicated, MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells were transfected with a plasmid for MYBBP1A expression with or without siRNA for p53. These cells were cultured under suspension conditions for 24 h, and viable cell numbers were counted using trypan blue dye exclusion or assessed by MTT assay. Protein levels of MYBBP1A and p53 in the cells were determined by immunoblotting. Bars = mean + s.d. (n = 3).

To further examine the role of MYBBP1A in anoikis, we examined cellular apoptosis as determined by Annexin V–FITC/PI staining, followed by flow cytometric analysis. In accordance with the results shown in Figures 3 and 4, apoptosis decreased after p53 and MYBBP1A knockdown and increased when these genes were overexpressed (Figure 5A). Moreover, MYBBP1A overexpression in p53 knocked-down cells did not result in any significant effects (Figure 5B). These results indicate that MYBBP1A regulates p53-dependent anoikis.
Figure 5

MYBBP1A induces apoptosis during detached conditions in a p53-dependent manner. (A) MCF-7 cells were transfected with siRNA or a plasmid for p53 or MYBBP1A expression for 48 h, followed by anoikis assay. These cells were cultured under suspension conditions for 24 h, and apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V–FITC/PI staining followed by flow cytometry analyses. (B) p53 is required for MYBBP1A-induced anoikis. As indicated, MCF-7 cells were transfected with a plasmid for MYBBP1A expression with or without siRNA for p53. They were then cultured under suspension conditions for 24 h, after which apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V–FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry analyses.

MYBBP1A enhances p53 target genes expression during anoikis

Next, the effects of MYBBP1A knockdown on the induction of p53-target genes were examined. The mRNA levels of Bax, PUMA, and p21 were increased under detached conditions, whereas the increases in these mRNA levels were suppressed when MYBBP1A was knocked down using siRNA in MCF-7 cells (Figure 6A). Similar results were obtained with ZR-75-1 cells (Figure 6B). These results suggest that MYBBP1A regulates p53-dependent anoikis by enhancing p53 activation.
Figure 6

MYBBP1A enhances p53 target genes’ expression during anoikis. (A) and (B) MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells were treated with siRNAs for 48 h prior to anoikis assay and cultured under attached or detached conditions for 2 h (Bax mRNA) or 4 h (PUMA and p21 mRNA). Total RNAs were prepared and expressions of the indicated genes were analyzed by RT–qPCR. Bars = mean + s.d. (n = 3).

MYBBP1A enhances p53 activation during anoikis

The acetylation levels of p53 are increased in response to stress and correlate well with p53 activation and stabilization [26–28]. Accumulating evidence supports the conclusion that acetylation stabilizes p53 and is indispensable for p53 activation [29, 30]. Therefore, to study the molecular mechanism by which MYBBP1A induced anoikis in a p53-dependent manner, we examined whether MYBBP1A was involved in the accumulation of p53 protein and the acetylation of p53 K382 under detached conditions. Immunoblotting revealed that detached conditions induced the accumulation and acetylation of p53 (Figure 7A lane 3). However, p53 accumulation and acetylation were not observed when MYBBP1A was knocked down using siRNA (Figure 7A lane 4). This suggested that MYBBP1A was required for p53 activation in anoikis.
Figure 7

MYBBP1A enhances p53 activation during anoikis. (A) Acetylation at lysine 382 residues of p53 induced under detached conditions requires MYBBP1A. MCF-7 cells were treated with siControl or siMYBBP1A for 48 h followed by culture under attached or detached conditions for 2 h. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. (B) p53 recruitment to the Bax promoter under detached conditions requires MYBBP1A. MCF-7 cells were treated as shown in (A), and ChIP assay was performed using normal mouse IgG and anti-p53 antibodies. The p53-binding region of the Bax promoter was amplified and analyzed by RT–qPCR. (C) MYBBP1A translocates from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm under detached conditions. MCF-7 cells were cultured under attached or detached conditions for 2 h, after which the localizations of MYBBP1A and p53 were visualized by immunofluorescence using anti-MYBBP1A and anti-p53 antibodies. (D) Endogenous MYBBP1A associates with p53 under detached conditions. MCF-7 cells were cultured under detached conditions for 2 h. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG or anti-MYBBP1A antibodies and analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against MYBBP1A and p53. Bars = mean + s.d. (n = 3).

Consistent with these results, p53 recruitment to the Bax promoter was significantly enhanced under detached conditions, while p53 recruitment was abrogated by MYBBP1A knockdown (Figure 7B).

A previous report showed that MYBBP1A activates p53 by facilitating its direct interaction with p53 in response to stress when MYBBP1A translocated from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm [13]. Therefore, we examined the localization of MYBBP1A and the interaction between MYBBP1A and p53 under detached conditions. Immunostaining revealed that MYBBP1A translocated from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm under detached conditions (Figure 7C). Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation showed that endogenous MYBBP1A was bound to p53 in MCF-7 cells under detached conditions (Figure 7D). These results indicated that, under detached conditions, MYBBP1A translocates from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, and then binds to p53. Thus, MPBBP1A enhances p53 target gene transcription.

Discussion

In this study, we revealed the physiological significance of MYBBP1A in p53 activation for prevention of cancer. MYBBP1A was originally identified as a protein that interacted with the negative regulatory domain of c-Myb [31]. However, in studies done by a number of different groups, MYBBP1A was found to interact with and regulate several transcription factors. MYBBP1A binds to Prep1 or PGC-1α and inhibits their activity. Prep1 is involved in development and organogenesis, and PGC-1α is a key regulator of metabolic processes such as mitochondrial biogenesis, respiration, and gluco neogenesis in the liver [32, 33]. Correspondingly, MYBBBP1A also interacts with NF–κB and CRY1 and regulates their transcriptional activity [15, 34].

We previously reported that MYBBP1A interacts with p53 and activates its transcriptional capacity. MYBBP1A localizes predominantly in the nucleolus; however, it translocates from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm in response to cellular stress and activates p53 [13, 14, 35]. Similar to other kinds of stress, detached conditions induce p53 acetylation and target gene transcription in an MYBBP1A-dependent manner (Figures 6 and 7A). MYBBP1A plays an important role in p53 activation in response to detached condition to induce anoikis.

The regulation of MYBBP1A localization under detached conditions is still to be elucidated. When cells are exposed to UV light, MYBBP1A translocation is accompanied by nucleolar segregation [13]. Because the nucleolus appears to be intact after 2 h under detached conditions, there may be another signal that releases MYBBP1A from the nucleolus.

Numerous reports have shown that other nucleolar proteins can activate p53 similar to that by MYBBP1A. RPL11 directly bind to HDM2 and inhibit HDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination [36–41]. Similarly, the nucleolar proteins NPM, NCL, NS, and ARF can also directly bind to HDM2 and inhibit p53 ubiquitination [42–46]. Unlike with these nucleolar factors, MYBBP1A promotes p53 activation by directly binding to p53 without affecting HDM2 function. With regard to the pronounced effect of MYBBP1A knockdown on p53 accumulation and acetylation under detached conditions (Figure 7A), MYBBP1A may have a unique and essential function in response to detached conditions.

In addition, Sanhueza et al. recently reported that MYBBP1A regulates the proliferation and migration of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells [17]. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying these activities are unknown. In this study, we revealed a function for the nucleolar protein MYBBP1A in breast cancer. Therefore, our results provide a novel insight into the function of the nucleolar protein MYBBP1A in the biology of cancer cells.

Conclusion

To determine the role of MYBBP1A in cancer, we conducted an extensive analysis of the Oncomine database and IHC studies, and showed that MYBBP1A expression was associated with breast cancer tumorigenesis. In vivo and in vitro experiments using the breast cancer cell lines revealed that tumorigenesis, colony formation, and anoikis resistance were significantly enhanced by MYBBP1A knockdown. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that MYBBP1A binds to p53 under detached conditions and enhances p53 target gene transcription (Figure 8). These results revealed the physiological significance of MYBBP1A in p53 activation. Our results may lead to a novel strategy for breast cancer therapy.
Figure 8

Proposed model for the role of MYBBP1A in p53 dependent anoikis. See the text.

Notes

Abbreviations

p53: 

Protein 53

MYBBP1A: 

Myb-binding protein 1a

ECM: 

Extracellular matrix

p21: 

Protein 21

Bax: 

Bcl-2–associated X protein

PUMA: 

p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis

p300: 

Protein 300

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

FACS: 

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

FITC: 

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

RT-qPCR: 

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

shRNA: 

Short hairpin RNA

siRNA: 

Small interfering RNA

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

PMSF: 

Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

SDS-PAGE: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyaclylamidegel electrophoresis

ECL: 

Enhanced chemiluminescence

ChIP: 

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

PBS: 

Phosphate buffered saline

TBS-T: 

Tris-buffered saline and tween 20

TMA: 

Tissue microarray

OE: 

Overexpression

CBP: 

CREB-binding protein

qPCR: 

Quantitativepolymerase chain reaction

PGC-1α: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha

NF-κB: 

nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

CRY1: 

Cryptochrome 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba
(2)
Life Science Center of Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance, University of Tsukuba

References

  1. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Naghavi M: Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011, 378: 1461-1484. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61351-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Freedman VH, Shin SI: Cellular tumorigenicity in nude mice: correlation with cell growth in semi-solid medium. Cell. 1974, 3: 355-359. 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90050-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vousden KH, Lu X: Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 594-604. 10.1038/nrc864.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lacroix M, Toillon RA, Leclercq G: p53 and breast cancer, an update. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006, 13: 293-325. 10.1677/erc.1.01172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Frisch SM, Francis H: Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 1994, 124: 619-626. 10.1083/jcb.124.4.619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Frisch SM, Screaton RA: Anoikis mechanisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001, 13: 555-562. 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00251-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grossmann J: Molecular mechanisms of “detachment-induced apoptosis–Anoikis”. Apoptosis: an international journal on programmed cell death. 2002, 7: 247-260. 10.1023/A:1015312119693.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bachelder RE, Ribick MJ, Marchetti A, Falcioni R, Soddu S, Davis KR, Mercurio AM: p53 inhibits alpha 6 beta 4 integrin survival signaling by promoting the caspase 3-dependent cleavage of AKT/PKB. J Cell Biol. 1999, 147: 1063-1072. 10.1083/jcb.147.5.1063.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng H, Liu P, Wang ZC, Zou L, Santiago S, Garbitt V, Gjoerup OV, Iglehart JD, Miron A, Richardson AL, et al: SIK1 couples LKB1 to p53-dependent anoikis and suppresses metastasis. Sci Signal. 2009, 2: ra35-10.1126/scisignal.2000369.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ilic D, Almeida EA, Schlaepfer DD, Dazin P, Aizawa S, Damsky CH: Extracellular matrix survival signals transduced by focal adhesion kinase suppress p53-mediated apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 1998, 143: 547-560.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ravid D, Maor S, Werner H, Liscovitch M: Caveolin-1 inhibits cell detachment-induced p53 activation and anoikis by upregulation of insulin-like growth factor-I receptors and signaling. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1338-1347. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vitale M, Di Matola T, Bifulco M, Casamassima A, Fenzi G, Rossi G: Apoptosis induced by denied adhesion to extracellular matrix (anoikis) in thyroid epithelial cells is p53 dependent but fails to correlate with modulation of p53 expression. FEBS Lett. 1999, 462: 57-60. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01512-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuroda T, Murayama A, Katagiri N, Ohta YM, Fujita E, Masumoto H, Ema M, Takahashi S, Kimura K, Yanagisawa J: RNA content in the nucleolus alters p53 acetylation via MYBBP1A. EMBO J. 2011, 30: 1054-1066. 10.1038/emboj.2011.23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumazawa T, Nishimura K, Kuroda T, Ono W, Yamaguchi C, Katagiri N, Tsuchiya M, Masumoto H, Nakajima Y, Murayama A, et al: Novel nucleolar pathway connecting intracellular energy status with p53 activation. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 20861-20869. 10.1074/jbc.M110.209916.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Owen HR, Elser M, Cheung E, Gersbach M, Kraus WL, Hottiger MO: MYBBP1a is a novel repressor of NF-kappaB. J Mol Biol. 2007, 366: 725-736. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.099.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang CC, Liu H, Chen SL, Wang TH, Hsieh CL, Huang Y, Chen SJ, Chen HC, Yung BY, Chin-Ming Tan B: Epigenetic silencing of myogenic gene program by Myb-binding protein 1a suppresses myogenesis. EMBO J. 2012, 31: 1739-1751. 10.1038/emboj.2012.24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Acuna Sanhueza GA, Faller L, George B, Koffler J, Misetic V, Flechtenmacher C, Dyckhoff G, Plinkert PP, Angel P, Simon C, Hess J: Opposing function of MYBBP1A in proliferation and migration of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2012, 12: 72-10.1186/1471-2407-12-72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, Barrette T, Pandey A, Chinnaiyan AM: ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia. 2004, 6: 1-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, Barrette T, Pandey A, Chinnaiyan AM: Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9309-9314. 10.1073/pnas.0401994101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Data Portal. [https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/]
  21. Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F, Sadekova S, Souleimanova M, Zhao H, Chen H, Omeroglu G, Meterissian S, Omeroglu A, et al: Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 518-527. 10.1038/nm1764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson AL, Wang ZC, De Nicolo A, Lu X, Brown M, Miron A, Liao X, Iglehart JD, Livingston DM, Ganesan S: X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2006, 9: 121-132. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kajiro M, Hirota R, Nakajima Y, Kawanowa K, So-ma K, Ito I, Yamaguchi Y, Ohie SH, Kobayashi Y, Seino Y, et al: The ubiquitin ligase CHIP acts as an upstream regulator of oncogenic pathways. Nat Cell Biol. 2009, 11: 312-319. 10.1038/ncb1839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murayama A, Ohmori K, Fujimura A, Minami H, Yasuzawa-Tanaka K, Kuroda T, Oie S, Daitoku H, Okuwaki M, Nagata K, et al: Epigenetic control of rDNA loci in response to intracellular energy status. Cell. 2008, 133: 627-639. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Alimonti A, Carracedo A, Clohessy JG, Trotman LC, Nardella C, Egia A, Salmena L, Sampieri K, Haveman WJ, Brogi E, et al: Subtle variations in Pten dose determine cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 454-458. 10.1038/ng.556.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim JE, Chen J, Lou Z: DBC1 is a negative regulator of SIRT1. Nature. 2008, 451: 583-586. 10.1038/nature06500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Knights CD, Catania J, Di Giovanni S, Muratoglu S, Perez R, Swartzbeck A, Quong AA, Zhang X, Beerman T, Pestell RG, Avantaggiati ML: Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. J Cell Biol. 2006, 173: 533-544. 10.1083/jcb.200512059.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao W, Kruse JP, Tang Y, Jung SY, Qin J, Gu W: Negative regulation of the deacetylase SIRT1 by DBC1. Nature. 2008, 451: 587-590. 10.1038/nature06515.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Li M, Luo J, Brooks CL, Gu W: Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 50607-50611. 10.1074/jbc.C200578200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang Y, Zhao W, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Gu W: Acetylation is indispensable for p53 activation. Cell. 2008, 133: 612-626. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.025.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Keough R, Woollatt E, Crawford J, Sutherland GR, Plummer S, Casey G, Gonda TJ: Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human homologue of MYB binding protein (P160) 1A (MYBBP1A) to 17p13.3. Genomics. 1999, 62: 483-489. 10.1006/geno.1999.6035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fan M, Rhee J, St-Pierre J, Handschin C, Puigserver P, Lin J, Jaeger S, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Spiegelman BM: Suppression of mitochondrial respiration through recruitment of p160 myb binding protein to PGC-1alpha: modulation by p38 MAPK. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 278-289. 10.1101/gad.1152204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Diaz VM, Mori S, Longobardi E, Menendez G, Ferrai C, Keough RA, Bachi A, Blasi F: p160 Myb-binding protein interacts with Prep1 and inhibits its transcriptional activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 7981-7990. 10.1128/MCB.01290-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hara Y, Onishi Y, Oishi K, Miyazaki K, Fukamizu A, Ishida N: Molecular characterization of Mybbp1a as a co-repressor on the Period2 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: 1115-1126.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsuchiya M, Katagiri N, Kuroda T, Kishimoto H, Nishimura K, Kumazawa T, Iwasaki N, Kimura K, Yanagisawa J: Critical role of the nucleolus in activation of the p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011, 407: 378-382. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.03.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marechal V, Elenbaas B, Piette J, Nicolas JC, Levine AJ: The ribosomal L5 protein is associated with mdm-2 and mdm-2-p53 complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 7414-7420.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Lohrum MA, Ludwig RL, Kubbutat MH, Hanlon M, Vousden KH: Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 577-587. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00134-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y, Wolf GW, Bhat K, Jin A, Allio T, Burkhart WA, Xiong Y: Ribosomal protein L11 negatively regulates oncoprotein MDM2 and mediates a p53-dependent ribosomal-stress checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 8902-8912. 10.1128/MCB.23.23.8902-8912.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Dai MS, Lu H: Inhibition of MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by ribosomal protein L5. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 44475-44482. 10.1074/jbc.M403722200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dai MS, Zeng SX, Jin Y, Sun XX, David L, Lu H: Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 7654-7668. 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7654-7668.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Jin A, Itahana K, O’Keefe K, Zhang Y: Inhibition of HDM2 and activation of p53 by ribosomal protein L23. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 7669-7680. 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7669-7680.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Kamijo T, Weber JD, Zambetti G, Zindy F, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ: Functional and physical interactions of the ARF tumor suppressor with p53 and Mdm2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 8292-8297. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8292.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Pomerantz J, Schreiber-Agus N, Liegeois NJ, Silverman A, Alland L, Chin L, Potes J, Chen K, Orlow I, Lee HW, et al: The Ink4a tumor suppressor gene product, p19Arf, interacts with MDM2 and neutralizes MDM2’s inhibition of p53. Cell. 1998, 92: 713-723. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81400-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurki S, Peltonen K, Latonen L, Kiviharju TM, Ojala PM, Meek D, Laiho M: Nucleolar protein NPM interacts with HDM2 and protects tumor suppressor protein p53 from HDM2-mediated degradation. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5: 465-475. 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00110-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Saxena A, Rorie CJ, Dimitrova D, Daniely Y, Borowiec JA: Nucleolin inhibits Hdm2 by multiple pathways leading to p53 stabilization. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 7274-7288. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209714.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Dai MS, Sun XX, Lu H: Aberrant expression of nucleostemin activates p53 and induces cell cycle arrest via inhibition of MDM2. Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 28: 4365-4376. 10.1128/MCB.01662-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    47. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/65/prepub

Copyright

© Akaogi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement