Skip to main content

Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells and Ki67: their mutual correlation and prognostic implications in hepatocellular carcinoma



Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (M-CTCs) may be related to tumor progression, and Ki67 expression is known to be involved in tumor proliferation. The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between M-CTCs and Ki67 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and their ability to predict prognosis.


Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 105 HCC patients before radical surgery. CTCs were isolated using CanPatrol enrichment and classified via in situ hybridization. Ki67 expression in HCC tissue was assessed through immunohistochemistry. Potential relationships of M-CTC, Ki67 with clinicopathological factors and prognosis were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression. The prognostic efficacy of M-CTC, Ki67 and both together (M-CTC + Ki67) was assessed in terms of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Harrell's concordance index.


Of the 105 patients, 50 were positive for M-CTCs (count ≥ 1 per 5 mL) and 39 showed high Ki67 expression (≥ 50% tumor cells were Ki67-positive). The presence of M-CTC was significantly associated with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/mL (P = 0.007), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.023), multiple tumors (P < 0.001), poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.003), incomplete tumor capsule (P < 0.001), Barcelona Clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B or C (P < 0.001), microvascular invasion (MVI) (P = 0.05) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) (P = 0.006). High Ki67 expression correlated with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL (P = 0.015), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.012), incomplete tumor capsule (P < 0.001), MVI (P = 0.001), PVTT (P = 0.003), advanced BCLC stage (P = 0.01), and vessel carcinoma embolus (VCE) (P = 0.001). M-CTC positively correlated with Ki67. Patients positive for M-CTCs had a significantly shorter OS than patients negative for them. Similarly, high Ki67 expression was associated with a significantly lower OS. The high-risk group (positive for M-CTCs and high Ki67 expression) had worse OS than the other groups (P < 0.0001). Uni- and multivariate analyses showed that OS was independently predicted by M-CTC [hazard ratio (HR) 1.115; P < 0.001], Ki67 (HR 1.666; P = 0.046) and the combination of both (HR 2.885; P = 0.008). Based on ROC curves and the concordance index, the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 was superior to either parameter alone for predicting the OS of HCC patients.


The presence of M-CTC correlates with high Ki67 expression in HCC patients, and both factors are associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 is a useful prognostic indicator for predicting OS in patients with HCC after hepatectomy, performing better than either parameter on its own.

Peer Review reports


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent malignant neoplasms, ranking among the top five leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1, 2]. Surgical resection remains the primary potentially curative treatment, yet long-term survival remains unsatisfactory, mainly due to a high incidence of recurrence and mortality. Currently, there is no reliable method for predicting the fate of individual patients with HCC [3]. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), although it is considered the most reliable biomarker of HCC diagnosis, performs poorly as a prognostic indicator. For example, 40–60% of HCC patients exhibit normal AFP levels [4], making it unreliable as a marker for monitoring recurrence after resection. Other prognostic factors for HCC have been proposed, including the tumor / node / metastases (TNM) staging system and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system; however, the accuracy of these systems can vary substantially [5]. Thus, a sensitive and effective biomarker is urgently required to help predict patients’ outcomes, which may improve patient management and therefore survival.

One such biomarker may be circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which have potent proliferative and metastatic abilities. CTCs may shed from the primary tumor into the bloodstream before or even during surgical resection, then travel throughout the body via the systemic circulation. Detecting CTCs by liquid biopsy may substantially improve prognosis prediction and detection of recurrence [6, 7]. CTCs can be classified into three subpopulations: epithelial (E-CTCs), mesenchymal (M-CTCs), or an intermediate subtype undergoing the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (E/M-CTCs) [8]. These subtypes can be distinguished based on expression of surface markers. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a phenotypic change marked by the loss of epithelial characteristics and the acquisition of invasive mesenchymal properties, is considered essential for metastasis [9]. CTCs gain mesenchymal features via EMT and drive HCC metastasis [10, 11]. Levels of M-CTC not only represent the progression and state of the disease, but also serve as a prognostic marker. In fact, recent studies have demonstrated that M-CTCs are better at predicting prognosis than the total number of CTCs in patients with lung [12], gastric [13], or breast cancer [14].

Accurately predicting the prognosis of HCC patients will likely require taking into account other factors in addition to M-CTCs. One such factor may be cell proliferation, as assessed based on expression of the DNA-binding nuclear protein Ki67. This protein is expressed in all phases of mitosis except the G0 phase, and it consistently shows high sensitivity and specificity as a marker of proliferative cells [15]. Ki67 upregulation may help drive the proliferation of malignant tumor cells, making it a potential biomarker of tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis [16].

Combining the characteristics of tumor proliferation and CTCs may lead to more accurate prediction of prognosis of patients with various solid neoplasms, including non-small cell lung cancer [17] and renal cell carcinoma [18]. However, we are unaware of reports assessing the relationship between M-CTC and Ki67 in patients with HCC. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether the M-CTC count in peripheral blood and Ki67 expression in tumor tissues correlate with each other and whether they can, alone or together, predict survival of patients with HCC.


Study population

A total of 105 patients were enrolled between March 2014 and May 2017 at the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (Nanning, China). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) definitive HCC diagnosis based on World Health Organization criteria [19]; (2) liver function in Child–Pugh A stage and Performance Status Test score of 0–1; (3) treatment by R0 resection, defined as complete macroscopic removal of the tumor, negative resection margin and no detectable residual intra- or extrahepatic metastatic lesions; (4) no history of anticancer treatment, such as trans-arterial chemoembolization or targeted therapy; and (5) availability of complete medical records. Patients with other systemic tumors and autoimmune diseases were excluded. Peripheral venous punctures within one week before surgery were used to analyze preoperative blood markers, including AFP and hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA). Cut-off values were 400 ng/mL for AFP and 5.0 × 102 IU/mL for HBV-DNA, as recommended by the assay manufacturer.

The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (approval number: LW2022121). The requirement for informed consent to participate was waived by the Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. The reason for the waiver of informed consent is because all patients, on admission, consented for their anonymized medical data to be analyzed and published for research purposes.

CTC isolation and in situ hybridization

At 1–2 days before resection, peripheral blood (5 mL) was collected into anticoagulant-coated tubes for assays of CTCs. CTCs were isolated using the CanPatrol enrichment method [20, 21]. Briefly, erythrocytes were removed using red blood cell lysis buffer (Sur Exam, Guangzhou, China), and the remaining cells were resuspended for 5 min in 4% formaldehyde dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Next, the blood was filtered using a filter tube (Sur Exam) fitted with a membrane containing pores of diameter 8 µm (Sur Exam) on a E-Z96 vacuum manifold (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA) attached to a vacuum pump (Auto Science, Tianjin, China) set to 0.08 MPa [22].

In situ hybridization was used to detect mRNAs expressing the epithelial biomarkers (EpCAM and CK8/18/19), as well as the mesenchymal biomarkers (Vimentin and Twist). Assays were performed in 24-well plates (Corning, NY, USA). Cells on the membrane were treated with a protease (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), then subjected to in situ hybridization (see Supplementary Table S1 for probe sequences) as previously described [20, 23]. In our study, P53 gene R249S mutation was detected in the DNA of both primary tumors and CTCS, but not in non-tumor liver tissues, thus confirming that CTCs originate from primary tumors [20]. A total CTC count or M-CTC count of 0 per 5 mL was defined as negative; ≥ 1 per 5 mL, as positive.

Ki67 immunohistochemistry

Samples from representative areas of HCC tumors excised during surgery were fixed with formalin, embedded in paraffin, deparaffinized with xylene, incubated for 2 min in repair solution under high pressure at high temperature, allowed to cool to room temperature, and finally washed three times with PBS for 15 min. Samples were then treated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min, washed with PBS as above, incubated with primary antibody against Ki67 (1:100; Gene Tech, Shanghai, China), and washed again with PBS as above. Samples were incubated for 120 min at 37 °C using horseradish peroxidase-labelled secondary antibody. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as the chromogen. Samples were washed with water for 10 min, stained with hematoxylin, then washed until colorless. Ki67-positive staining was defined as the presence of brownish-yellow granules in the nucleus. The proportion of positively stained cells was calculated as the Ki67 proliferative index (Figure S1). Samples were assessed independently by two pathologists who were blind to clinical and follow-up data.

Patient follow-up

The 105 patients were followed up every 1–2 months for the first year and every 3 months thereafter, with the last follow-up on July 31, 2021. Follow-up procedures included ultrasonography, dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and serum AFP measurement. Recurrence was diagnosed in patients who (1) showed elevated AFP as well as evidence of recurrence based on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance; or (2) showed normal AFP but evidence of recurrence based on two of the three imaging modalities; or (3) whose biopsies of new lesions showed pathology indicative of recurrence [24]. Recurrence location was classified as intra- or extrahepatic. OS was defined as the time from surgery until all-cause death or until the last recorded follow-up visit.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and R version 4.1.2 ( All statistical assessments were two-tailed, and results were considered significant if associated with P < 0.05.

Patient characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Intergroup differences were assessed for significance using the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. The optimal cut-off value for defining Ki67 positivity was determined by X-tile (version 3.6.1) [25]. Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in order to identify associations among clinical features, M-CTC count and Ki67 expression. Correlation between M-CTC and Ki67 was assessed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated, then compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. When appropriate, hazard ratios (HRs) were reported together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was measured to evaluate the ability of total CTC, M-CTC, Ki67, or the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 to predict OS. The time-dependent ROC and concordance index were analyzed using the R packages “timeROC” and “Hmisc”.


Patient characteristics

The study analyzed 90 men and 15 women, and the median age of all patients was 46.2 (range, 20–72) years. Most patients (75, 71.4%) had HBV-DNA levels ≥ 5.0 × 102 IU/mL, and just over half (59, 56.2%) had AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL. Just under half (42, 40.0%) had poorly differentiated tumors, 82 (78.1%) had primary tumors ≥ 5 cm, 23 (21.9%) had primary tumors < 5 cm, and 40 (38.1%) had multiple tumors. Three of patients were BCLC stage 0, 54 BCLC A, 25 BCLC B and 23 BCLC C. A smaller proportion (41, 39.0%) had an incomplete tumor capsule. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (N = 105)

Relative proportions of CTC phenotypes

Representative images of the three subtypes of CTCs that were isolated from the 105 HCC patients before surgery are shown in Fig. 1. The overall rate of CTC positivity was 93.3% (range, 0–76%), and the median and mean counts were 6 and 11.55 per 5 mL, respectively (Table 2). Total CTC count tended to increase with disease progression but did not differ significantly between patients in BCLC stage B or C (Fig. 2A). In contrast, E-CTC and E/M-CTC count did not vary with HCC progression (Fig. 2B-C). Notably, the rates of M-CTC positivity were 28% in stages 0-A, 68% in stage B and 78.2% in stage C (Table 2), and the M-CTC count increased with disease progression (Fig. 2D). Therefore, HCC progression in our sample was associated with an increase in the number of CTCs undergoing the EMT. Furthermore, total CTC and M-CTC predicted OS with respective AUCs of 0.554 and 0.614 (Fig. S2). In other words, M-CTC outperformed total CTC for predicting survival.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative micrographs of circulating tumor cell (CTC) subpopulations. CTCs were stained for epithelial markers (EpCAM and CK8/18/19, red fluorescence) and mesenchymal markers (Vimentin and Twist, green fluorescence). A Epithelial CTCs (E-CTCs). B Epithelial/mesenchymal hybrid CTCs (E/M-CTCs). C Mesenchymal CTCs (M-CTCs). Magnification, 100 × 

Table 2 Rates of positivity and counts of total CTCs and different CTC subpopulations in HCC patients
Fig. 2
figure 2

Total circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts and counts for the three CTC subpopulations in hepatocellular carcinoma patients stratified by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage. A Total CTC count. B Epithelial CTC (E-CTC) count. C Epithelial/mesenchymal hybrid CTC (E/M-CTC) count. D Mesenchymal CTC (M-CTC) count

Optimal cut-off for classifying samples based on Ki67 expression

Based on immunohistochemistry, an optimal cut-off value was determined using the X-Tile statistical package to classify patients into those showing low or high Ki67 expression. Low expression was defined as tumor tissue in which < 50% of tumor cells were positive for Ki67, while high expression was defined as tissue in which at least half of tumor cells were positive (Fig. S3).

Association of Ki67 expression with CTC type

Relationships between Ki67 expression and CTCs are shown in Table 3. Patients with high Ki67 expression showed a significantly higher rate of M-CTC positivity than patients with low Ki67 expression (61.5%, 24/39 vs. 39.3%, 26/66; P = 0.03). M-CTC showed a weak positive correlation with Ki67 based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r = 0.305; P = 0.001; Fig. 3). In contrast, Ki67 expression was not significantly associated with the rates of positivity for total CTCs (count ≥ 6 per 5 mL), E-CTCs or E/M-CTCs (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Associations between CTC levels and Ki67 expression
Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between preoperative mesenchymal circulating tumor cell count (M-CTC) in peripheral blood and Ki-67 in tumor tissue of HCC patients

Relationships of M-CTC or Ki67 with clinicopathological characteristics of HCC

Relationships between M-CTC and clinical parameters are shown in Table 4. The rate of M-CTC positivity was significantly higher among patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL (P = 0.007), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.023), multiple tumors (P < 0.001), poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.003), incomplete tumor capsule (P < 0.001), BCLC stage B or C (P < 0.001), MVI (P = 0.05) or PVTT (P = 0.006). In contrast, age, sex, HBsAg, HBV-DNA, and vessel carcinoma embolus (VCE) were not significantly associated with M-CTC.

Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between HCC patients positive or negative for M-CTC

Ki67 expression and clinicopathological parameters of HCC are presented in Table 5. Among the 105 HCC tissues, 39 (37.1%) were positive for Ki67. High Ki67 expression was significantly associated with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL (P = 0.015), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.012), incomplete tumor capsule (P < 0.001), MVI (P = 0.001), PVTT (P = 0.003), advanced BCLC stage (P = 0.01), and VCE (P = 0.001). Other factors were not significantly associated with Ki67, including age, sex, HBsAg, tumor number, Edmondson grade, or liver cirrhosis.

Table 5 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between HCC patients with low (< 50%) or high (≥ 50%) Ki67 expression

Prognostic potential of M-CTC and Ki67 in HCC

Patients lacking M-CTCs had significantly longer OS than patients positive for M-CTCs (P < 0.0001, Fig. 4A). In addition, patients with high Ki67 expression showed worse OS than those with low expression (P = 0.00039, Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS) based on A mesenchymal circulating tumor cell (M-CTC) status (positive or negative) or B Ki-67 expression (low or high)

To improve the accuracy and stability of prognosis prediction for HCC, we analyzed the M-CTC and Ki67 in combination. In our cohort, patients were classified into three groups: (1) the high-risk group, who were positive for M-CTCs and showed high Ki67 expression; (2) the medium-risk group, who were negative for M-CTCs and showed high Ki67 expression, or were positive for M-CTCs and showed low Ki67 expression; and (3) the low-risk group, who were negative for M-CTCs and showed low Ki67 expression. Our data showed that the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 correlated with AFP, tumor size, tumor number, Edmondson grade, tumor capsule, MVI, PVTT, BCLC stage and VCE (Table 6).

Table 6 Correlation of the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 with clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients

Kaplan–Meier survival showed that the high-risk group had significantly worse OS than the other two groups (P < 0.0001, Fig. 5A). Next, the predictive performance of the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 was assessed for patients in different BCLC stages. Among the 57 patients in BCLC stages 0-A, the high-risk group showed significantly worse OS than the other two groups (P < 0.0001, Fig. 5B). However, OS did not differ significantly among patients in the three risk groups who were in BCLC stages B-C (P = 0.14, Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC stratified by mesenchymal circulating tumor cell (M-CTC) and Ki-67. A All patients. B Patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0-A. C Patients in BCLC stages B-C

Univariate and multivariate survival analysis

Univariate analysis of OS identified 12 variables as prognostic factors: AFP, tumor size, tumor number, Edmondson grade, tumor capsule, MVI, PVTT, BCLC stage, VCE, Ki67, M-CTC and the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 (Table 7). Next, two separate multivariate models were generated to avoid multicollinearity among M-CTC, Ki67 and their combination. One model demonstrated that MVI, BCLC stage, Ki67 and M-CTC were independent prognostic factors for OS. The other model revealed that AFP, BCLC stage and the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 had prognostic significance for OS (Table 8).

Table 7 Univariate analysis of clinicopathological characteristics associated with overall survival
Table 8 Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological characteristics associated with overall survival

Prognostic performance of M-CTC, Ki67 and their combination

Time-dependent ROC curves for predicting OS at 1, 2 and 3 years were generated to compare the performance of M-CTC, Ki67 or their combination. The combination nearly equaled the prognostic power of M-CTC for 1-year OS, and it was superior to the performance of M-CTC or Ki67 for 2- and 3-year OS (Fig. 6). Then we calculated AUC values for M-CTC, Ki67 or their combination. The integration of the estimated AUCs using a time-dependent ROC curve clearly showed that the combination of M-CTC and Ki67 predicted OS better than either parameter alone (Fig. 7). The concordance index for the combination was 0.704, greater than that for M-CTC alone (0.694) or Ki67 alone (0.624).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Time-dependent AUC curves of mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (M-CTC), Ki67, and their combination for prediction of overall survival of patients with HCC. Overall survival was predicted at A 1 year, B 2 years or C 3 years after hepatectomy. AUC, area under the curve

Fig. 7
figure 7

Comparison of time-dependent ROC curves for predicting overall survival of patients with HCC using mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (M-CTC), Ki67, or their combination. AUC, area under the curve. ROC, receiver operating characteristic


Improving prognosis for HCC patients requires personalized determination of recurrence risk and careful monitoring after treatment. Here we provide the first evidence that combining M-CTCs and Ki67 may stratify patients according to OS better than either parameter on its own, particularly according to OS at 2–3 years after hepatectomy. Thus, the combination of the two biomarkers may guide treatment and monitoring of HCC patients who have undergone hepatic resection. This combination takes into account essential pathological features, including tumor progression and proliferation. It may become easier to assay the combination as the cost of CTC analysis falls.

CTCs have been validated as a robust biomarker to predict prognosis, so their determination may guide precision treatment of HCC [26]. Assessment of CTCs should include phenotypic identification to characterize cells based on epithelial and mesenchymal markers [27]. M-CTCs are thought to be the most malignant CTCs [20, 28]: several signaling mechanisms protect mesenchymal-like cells from anoikis, including PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, Wnt/β-catenin, and p53/p63 pathways [29]. A high M-CTC percentage is closely associated with expression of CK19 and poor prognosis in HCC [30]. Similar to M-CTCs, expression of Ki67 is strongly related to tumor proliferation and growth.

Mesenchymal tumor cells infiltrate the extracellular matrix by releasing proteolytic degradation enzymes and crossing the basement membrane, they enter the circulation and they eventually extravasate to initiate secondary micro-metastasis [31, 32]. This implies a link between M-CTCs and cancer progression. Indeed, M-CTC count is significantly higher in advanced HCC than in early disease [33], and we found the M-CTC count to predict OS better than the total CTC count. Our study also found that M-CTC positivity was associated with several features of HCC malignancy, including high AFP, larger and multiple tumors, poor tumor differentiation, incomplete tumor capsule, and the presence of MVI and PVTT. This may help explain why patients in our study who were positive for M-CTCs had significantly worse outcomes than those negative for the cells, and why M-CTC was an independent predictor of shorter OS. Previous work has shown that patients positive for M-CTCs are more likely to experience early recurrence [34]. Our previous work revealed that anatomical resection may not be more beneficial than non-anatomical resection for patients positive for M-CTCs [24]. Therefore, M-CTCs should be considered an aggressive subtype, and CTC analysis before surgery can help guide the choice of resection method. We further recommend that HCC patients positive for M-CTCs should be treated with more effective therapies against recurrence and should be monitored closely after treatment.

Our study suggests that in addition to M-CTCs, Ki67 can help individualize treatment and surveillance. Higher Ki67 levels reflect the enhanced proliferative activity of tumor cells. A meta-analysis of 54 studies involving 4,996 HCC patients revealed that Ki67 expression was associated with more advanced tumor stage [35]. However, the tumors in the meta-analyzed studies were dichotomized arbitrarily into those expressing low or high Ki67 values [36,37,38]. In the present study, we obtained the optimal cut-off value of Ki67 using X-tile software [25], a widely recognized and applied method in many studies. Based on this cut-off, high Ki67 expression correlated significantly with unfavorable clinicopathological features and with significantly worse OS after hepatectomy. In addition, multivariate analysis identified Ki67 as an independent predictor for OS after hepatectomy.

The observed weak link between M-CTC and Ki67 may reflect that CTCs are derived from the primary tumor and therefore share similar characteristics, yet the tumor microenvironment undergoes substantial changes when tumor cells detach from the primary tumor and enter the bloodstream [39]. Our patients classified as high-risk based on positive M-CTC and high Ki67 expression showed significantly shorter OS than those classified as medium- or low-risk, even if their HCC was in early stages. Similarly, prognosis was significantly worse for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were positive for M-CTCs and had high Ki67 expression than for patients with only one of these two risk factors [17]. We hypothesize that the proliferative effects of Ki67 synergize with the EMT of CTCs to promote HCC progression, ultimately leading to poor prognosis. These results may help improve the risk stratification of patients with HCC. In particular, high-risk patients may benefit from a higher intensity of adjuvant therapy and follow-up.

This study has several limitations. First, it was a single-center retrospective study with a relatively small sample, which increases the risk of selection bias and lack of generalizability to other patient populations. Our findings should be validated and extended in larger, multi-center, prospective studies. Second, the current study was stratified the Ki67 index according to the cut-off point determined by the X-Title software, but other studies have shown different stratification parameters [40]; the precise cut-off value needs to be established with more research for further verification. Furthermore, we did not examine possible mechanistic explanations for the observed association of M-CTC count or Ki67 expression with poor OS. Future studies should elucidate how elevated Ki67 expression and M-CTCs worsen the prognosis of HCC patients.


Our results suggest that an increase in the number of M-CTCs in preoperative peripheral blood closely correlates with high Ki67 expression in HCC tissues, and that both events promote tumor progression, ultimately leading to poor OS. Our study provides strong evidence that M-CTCs and Ki67 together may serve as a prognostic biomarker for stratifying HCC patients by risk of poor prognosis. These findings may help clinical decision-making and management of HCC patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





Area under the curve


Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer


Circulating tumor cell


Confidence interval


Epithelial circulating tumor cell


Epithelial/mesenchymal hybrid circulating tumor cell


Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition


Hepatitis B surface antigen


Hepatitis B virus DNA


Hazard ratio


Hepatocellular carcinoma


Mesenchymal circulating tumor cell


Microvascular invasion


Odds ratio


Overall survival


Phosphate-buffered saline


Portal vein tumor thrombosis


Receiver operating characteristic


Tumor / node / metastases


Vessel carcinoma embolus


  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(10):589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Couri T, Pillai A. Goals and targets for personalized therapy for HCC. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(2):125–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malek NP, Schmidt S, Huber P, Manns MP, Greten TF. The diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(7):101–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qin LX, Tang ZY. Recent progress in predictive biomarkers for metastatic recurrence of human hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130(9):497–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maravelia P, Silva DN, Rovesti G, Chrobok M, Stål P, Lu YC, et al. Liquid Biopsy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Opportunities and Challenges for Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(17):4334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pantel K, Alix-Panabières C. Circulating tumour cells in cancer patients: challenges and perspectives. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16(9):398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsongalis GJ. Branched DNA technology in molecular diagnostics. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(3):448–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giannelli G, Koudelkova P, Dituri F, Mikulits W. Role of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):798–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiery JP, Lim CT. Tumor dissemination: an EMT affair. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(3):272–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Micalizzi DS, Haber DA, Maheswaran S. Cancer metastasis through the prism of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in circulating tumor cells. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(7):770–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li S, Chen Q, Li H, Wu Y, Feng J, Yan Y. Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and OCT4 mRNA expression in CTCs for prognosis prediction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017;19(9):1147–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li TT, Liu H, Li FP, Hu YF, Mou TY, Lin T, et al. Evaluation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitioned circulating tumor cells in patients with resectable gastric cancer: Relevance to therapy response. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(47):13259–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guan X, Ma F, Li C, Wu S, Hu S, Huang J, et al. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of circulating tumor cell phenotype detection based on epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in the first-line chemotherapy of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019;39(1):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, Stein H. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int J Cancer. 1983;31(1):13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menon SS, Guruvayoorappan C, Sakthivel KM, Rasmi RR. Ki-67 protein as a tumour proliferation marker. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;491:39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng H, Tan X, Wang Y, Dai L, Liang G, Guo J, et al. Clinical significance of Ki67 and circulating tumor cells with an epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype in non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(6):2916–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song J, Yu Z, Dong B, Zhu M, Guo X, Ma Y, et al. Clinical significance of circulating tumour cells and Ki-67 in renal cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system (IARC WHO Classification of Tumours). 4th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization. 2010; p 5771–5418.

  20. Qi LN, Xiang BD, Wu FX, Ye JZ, Zhong JH, Wang YY, et al. Circulating Tumor Cells Undergoing EMT Provide a Metric for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4731–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu YK, Hu BS, Li ZL, He X, Li Y, Lu LG. An improved strategy to detect the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(4):640–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu S, Liu S, Liu Z, Huang J, Pu X, Li J, et al. Classification of circulating tumor cells by epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bai T, Mai R, Ye J, Chen J, Qi L, Tang J, et al. Circulating tumor cells and CXCR4 in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Translational Cancer Research. 2020;9(3):1384–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Qi LN, Ma L, Chen YY, Chen ZS, Zhong JH, Gong WF, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma according to circulating tumour-cell status. Ann Med. 2020;52(1–2):21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn JC, Teng PC, Chen PJ, Posadas E, Tseng HR, Lu SC, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells and their implications as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic monitoring in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021;73(1):422–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ou H, Huang Y, Xiang L, Chen Z, Fang Y, Lin Y, et al. Circulating Tumor Cell Phenotype Indicates Poor Survival and Recurrence After Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(9):2373–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Okabe T, Togo S, Fujimoto Y, Watanabe J, Sumiyoshi I, Orimo A, et al. Mesenchymal characteristics and predictive biomarkers on circulating tumor cells for therapeutic strategy. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(12):3588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiwari N, Gheldof A, Tatari M, Christofori G. EMT as the ultimate survival mechanism of cancer cells. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22(3):194–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Q, Xing W, Zhang J, Hu J, Qi L, Xiang B. Circulating tumor cells undergoing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition: influence on prognosis in cytokeratin 19-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2021;14:1543–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peralta M, Osmani N, Goetz JG. Circulating tumor cells: Towards mechanical phenotyping of metastasis. iScience. 2022;25(3):103969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Perea Paizal J, Au SH, Bakal C. Squeezing through the microcirculation: survival adaptations of circulating tumour cells to seed metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(1):58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng Y, Luo L, Zhang J, Zhou M, Tang Y, He G, et al. Diagnostic value of different phenotype circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(12):2354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Z, Luo L, Cheng Y, He G, Peng B, Gao Y, et al. Correlation between postoperative early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and mesenchymal circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(4):633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Luo Y, Ren F, Liu Y, Shi Z, Tan Z, Xiong H, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of high Ki-67 labeling index in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):10235–47.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Tobar A, Halpern M, Levy I, Shabtai E, Ben-Ari Z. Tissue expression of squamous cellular carcinoma antigen and Ki67 in hepatocellular carcinoma-correlation with prognosis: a historical prospective study. Diagn Pathol. 2011;6:121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. King KL, Hwang JJ, Chau GY, Tsay SH, Chi CW, Lee TG, et al. Ki-67 expression as a prognostic marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13(3):273–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stroescu C, Dragnea A, Ivanov B, Pechianu C, Herlea V, Sgarbura O, et al. Expression of p53, Bcl-2, VEGF, Ki67 and PCNA and prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17(4):411–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rodriguez-Martinez A, Simon-Saez I, Perales S, Garrido-Navas C, Russo A, de Miguel-Perez D, et al. Exchange of cellular components between platelets and tumor cells: impact on tumor cells behavior. Theranostics. 2022;12(5):2150–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li HH, Qi LN, Ma L, Chen ZS, Xiang BD, Li LQ. Effect of KI-67 positive cellular index on prognosis after hepatectomy in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A and B hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:4747–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81960450), the National Major Special Science and Technology Project (grant no. 2017ZX10203207), the High-Level Innovation Team and Outstanding Scholar Program in Guangxi Colleges and Universities, the “139” Project for Training of High-Level Medical Science Talents from Guangxi, the Key Research and Development Project of Guangxi (grant nos. AA18221001, AB18050020, and 2020AB34006), the Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for 215 Regional High-Frequency Tumors of the Ministry of Education, the Guangxi Independent Research Project (grant nos. GKE2017-ZZ02, GKE2018-KF02, and GKE2019-ZZ07), and the Development and Application of Medical and Health Appropriate Technology in Guangxi (grant no. S2019039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



XY, HN, ZL, LQ and BX contributed to the study conception and design. XY, JZ and QZ performed data collection; XY, SN and LQ performed data analysis; XY, ZL, SN and LQ provided the methodology; XY and HN wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and XY, HN, ZL, LQ and BX completed the writing-review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lunan Qi or Bangde Xiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (approval number: LW2022121). The requirement for informed consent to participate was waived by the Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Observation of nuclear Ki67 staining in a case of HCC tissue sample. Ki67-positive staining was identified as the presence of brownish-yellow granules in the nucleus. (A, B) Ki67 ≥ 50%; (C, D) Ki67 < 50%. (A, C) Magnification, 100 ×; (B, D) Magnification, 400 ×. Figure S2. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of total circulating tumor cell (Total CTC) and mesenchymal CTC (M-CTC) count on prediction of tumor recurrence after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Figure S3. (A), Data represented graphically in a right-triangular grid in which each point (pixel) represents the data from a given set of divisions. The vertical axis represents all possible “high” populations with the size of the high population increasing from top to bottom. Similarly, the horizontal axis represents all possible “low” population with the size of the low population increasing from left to right. (B), The number of patients in each group for a given set of divisions.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Capture probe sequences for the EpCAM, CK8/18/19, vimentin and Twist genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Ni, H., Lu, Z. et al. Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells and Ki67: their mutual correlation and prognostic implications in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23, 10 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: