Skip to main content

MTHFD2 is a potential oncogene for its strong association with poor prognosis and high level of immune infiltrates in urothelial carcinomas of bladder



The bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2, methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase (MTHFD2) has been reported to play an oncogenic role in various types of cancers. However, the function of MTHFD2 in urothelial carcinomas of bladder (UCB) and its association with tumor immune infiltration remains unknown. We aim to examine the suitability of MTHFD2 to be a novel biomarker of bladder cancer and whether MTHFD2 is linked to immune infiltration.


RNA sequencing data and clinical information (bladder cancer samples: normal samples = 414: 19) were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas official website. Western blot analysis was performed to detect MTHFD2 expression in human bladder cancer (BLCA) cells and normal urothelial cell line SV-HUC-1. Associations between MTHFD2 expression and clinicopathological features were analyzed using Mann Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H test. The “survival” and “survminer” packages were utilized to plot Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Moreover, the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted using a clusterProfiler package. The correlation of MTHFD2 expression with immune infiltration level was estimated using the single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) algorithm. Furthermore, associations between MTHFD2 and immune checkpoint genes were evaluated using the correlation analysis.


Transcriptome analysis manifested that MTHFD2 was highly expressed in UCB tissues than normal bladder tissues, which was further confirmed by western blot analysis in human BLCA cells and SV-HUC-1 cells. Moreover, MTHFD2 high expression was significantly associated with the advanced disease progression. Also, the high expression of MTHFD2 was correlated with poor prognosis, and MTHFD2 was considered as an independent prognostic factor for disease specific survival. Furthermore, a number of cancer-related pathways were enriched in MTHFD2 high group, including NF-κB activation, JAK/STAT, and cancer immunotherapy by PD1 blockade. Several immune checkpoint molecules were also strongly associated with MTHFD2 expression, including PDCD1, CD274, CTLA4, CD276, LAG3, HAVCR2, and TIGIT.


MTHFD2 expression was remarkably elevated in UCB, suggesting that MTHFD2 could be a promising biomarker for BLCA as well as novel target for anti-cancer immunotherapy since its close association with immune infiltration.

Peer Review reports


Bladder cancer (BLCA) is the fourth most prevalent cancer expected to be diagnosed in men in the United States, with estimated 61,700 new cases and 12,120 deaths in 2022 [1]. The incidence rate in males is 3 to 5 times higher than that in females [2]. It is obvious that patients suffer a lot from this kind of disease which needs lifelong surveillance (with cystoscopy, bladder biopsy, and urine cytology) and invasive treatment. At the same time, remarkable morbidity and mortality of BLCA contribute to tremendous economic burdens on families and health care systems, causing serious social problems [3]. The major histology type of BLCA is urothelial carcinomas, where non-muscle-invasive BLCA (NMIBC) accounts for approximately 75% and the remaining is muscle-invasive BLCA (MIBC) [4]. The treatment regimens and efficacy of BLCA may be influenced by multiple factors, such as the disease stage, grade, associated risk factors, and other clinical characteristics. The current standard treatment for NMIBC is transurethral resection (TUR), followed by intravesical mitomycin C or bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) if necessary [5]. For MIBC, the front-line treatment is neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy [6]. Besides, MIBC is more aggressive and serious because 5-year survival rate of MIBC patients with localized disease is 60% and that of patients with metastases is less than 10% [7].

Urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (UCB) are histologically classified as high-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma (HGBC) and low-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma (LGBC). HGBC is more likely to have a high risk of recurrence, progression, and metastasis than LGBC. To our knowledge, both histological grade and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage are closely related to prognosis [5, 8]. However, there is no significant molecular marker able to predict prognosis or direct the treatment of UCB. Therefore, effective and reliable molecular markers are in high demand.

Previous literatures have proposed several potential prognostic factors for UCB, including urinary biomarkers, tissue biomarkers, blood biomarkers. Serial measurements of UroVysion FISH in urine were reported to have strong relationship with both cancer recurrence and progression. AUA/SUO expert opinion pointed that a clinician may use UroVysion FISH to assess response to intravesical BCG [9, 10]. For bladder tissue biomarkers, nuclear accumulation of p53 was found prognostic in MIBC, as well as inactivating mutation of Rb combined with other cell cycle regulatory proteins [11, 12]. Survivin and Bcl-2 family were also reported to be associated with bladder cancer recurrence and mortality among patients who performed radical cystectomy [13]. Meanwhile, FGFR3, GATA3, FOXA1, ERBB2, ERCC2, CDKN2A, STAG2,CDH1,CDH3,estrogen receptor-β etc., were reported to characterize patients with MIBC into distinct molecular subtypes, which could potentially predict prognosis [14, 15]. Insulin growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs), transforming growth factor–β1(TGF-β1) and VEGF, as UCB blood biomarkers, were illustrated to be associated with adverse survival outcomes [16]. However, these biomarkers have not yet been applied to clinical use as they are still unable to guide clinical decision-making in UCB. Thus, we intend to uncover more potential molecular candidates for UCB. The bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2, methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase (MTHFD2) is a mitochondrial enzyme that assumes a pivotal role in one-carbon folate metabolic. It was recently reported as a potential target for anticancer therapy. MTHFD2 has been observed to exert oncogenic effects in a variety of cancers. The non-metabolic functions of MTHFD2 in cancers have aroused considerable research interests. The high level of MTHFD2 has been shown to be connected with the poor prognosis of solid and hematological malignancies. For colorectal cancer cell lines, MTHFD2 could facilitate cell proliferation, migration, and cycle entry, and suppress cell apoptosis [17]. In breast cancer, MTHFD2 was reported to activate the AKT signaling pathway to promote tumorigenesis [18]. Meanwhile, MTHFD2 could accelerate tumorigenesis and metastasis via the AKT/glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β)/β-catenin signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma [19] and via the STAT3 signaling pathway in ovarian cancer [20]. Recently, MTHFD2 was found to affect bladder cancer cell growth by activating CDK2 [21]. All these observations indicated that MTHFD2 is tightly associated with the tumorigenesis of various cancer types.

However, the functional importance of MTHFD2 is still poorly investigated in BLCA. Intuitively, we suspect that MTHFD2 might play a role in BLCA progression as well as its prognosis. In this study, we provided lines of evidences to elucidate the correlation between MTHFD2 and prognosis of patients with UCB. For immune infiltrates, MTHFD2 expression was positively correlated with T helper 2 (Th2) cells, Th1 cells, macrophages, activated dendritic cells (aDCs), and T gamma delta (Tgd) immune cells. We conclude that MTHFD2 could be a promising biomarker for BLCA as well as a novel target for anti-cancer immunotherapy due to its close association with immune infiltration.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data and clinical information were downloaded from BLCA project level 3 HTSeq-Fragments Per Kilobase per Million (FPKM) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, FPKM data were converted to transcripts per million (TPM) data, and corresponding values were transformed using log2. Four hundred fourteen patients (tumor samples: normal samples = 414:19) with both RNA-seq data and clinical information were enrolled in this study. RNA-seq datasets from various bladder cancer cell lines such as UMUC10 and BFTC905, were downloaded from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE).

Cell lines and cell culture

Human BLCA cell lines (BIU-87, 5637, EJ, T24, and TCCSUP) and normal urothelial cell line SV-HUC-1 were purchased from National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource (Beijing, China). BIU-87, 5637, and EJ cell lines were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, California, USA) encompassing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco).

T24 and TCCSUP cell lines were cultured in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Media (Gibco), and SV-HUC-1 cell line was incubated in complete Ham’s F12K (Kaighn’s) modified medium (Gibco). All cells were cultured in a humidified CO2 condition at 37 °C.

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Proteins were extracted with Radio-Immunoprecipitation assay buffer (Shanghai Biotechwell, Shanghai, China), and protease and phosphatase inhibitors were added immediately before use. The protein concentration in the supernatant was measured using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Shanghai Biotechwell). Western blot analysis was performed following standard procedures. The primary antibodies employed in this study were MTHFD2 antibody (1:1000, mouse, Abcam) and β-actin antibody (1:2000, mouse, Shanghai Biotechwell). Secondary antibodies were horseradish peroxidase-coupled goat anti-mouse antibodies (12,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA).

Tumor immune estimation

The tumor immune estimation resource, version 2 (TIMER2.0) website ( can robustly estimate the connection of immune infiltrates with other factors, such as gene expression, mutation status, somatic copy-number variants, and clinical outcome. Meanwhile, users could explore cancer-related associations based on TCGA [22]. We predicted the expression difference of MTHFD2 between tumor and normal tissue in different tumors from “Gene_DE” module of TIMER2.0.

Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) was an unsupervised gene set enrichment method that can be applied for detecting subtle pathway activity changes within highly heterogeneous data sets [23]. The correlation of MTHFD2 expression with immune infiltration level (24 types of immune cells) was estimated using the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm by an R GSVA package. The analysis was conducted with the use of the different markers of various immune cells from the literature published in Cell [24]. The R ggplot2 package was adopted to assess the association between MTHFD2 expression and immune checkpoint molecule expression, including programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1), CD274, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4), CD276, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase-1 (IDO1), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2 (HAVCR2), and T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT).

siRNA transfection

siRNA sequences used to knock down MTHFD2 level were chemically synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. The siRNA sequences were as follows (MTHFD2-SI-17: sense-CGAAUGUGUUUGGAUCAGUAUTT, antisense-AUACUGAUCCAAACACAUUCGTT; MTHFD2-SI-36: sense-CGAGAAGUGCUGAAGUCUAAATT, antisense-UUUAGACUUCAGCACUUCUCGTT; NC: sense-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT, antisense-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT).

One day before transfection, plate cells in 24-well plate with 500 μl of growth medium without antibiotics. At the time of transfection, cells will be 50–70% confluent. For each well to be transfected, RNAi duplex-Lipofectamine RNAiMAX complexes were prepared as follows: a. Dilute 6 pmol RNAi duplex in 50 μl Opti-MEM Medium without serum. Mix gently. b. Mix Lipofectamine RNAiMAX gently before use, then dilute 1 μl in 50 μl Opti-MEM Medium. Mix gently. c. Combine the diluted RNAi duplex with the diluted Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX. Mix gently and incubate for 10–20 min at room temperature. Add the RNAi duplex-Lipofectamine RNAiMAX complexes to each well containing cells. This gives a final volume of 600 μl and a final RNA concentration of 10 nM. Mix gently by rocking the plate back and forth. Change medium after harvesting 4–6 h and incubate the cells 24–48 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator until we carry out further experiments.

Cell proliferation and cell circle analysis

Cell proliferation was measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8(CCK8), which was purchased from Dojindo Molecular Technologies. We performed the experiment following manufacturer-recommended procedures. Cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10^4/mL in 96-well plates. We record the absorbance at 450 nm at 0 h,24 h,48 h,72 h, 96 h using a microplate reader. Cell circle analysis was assessed by flow cytometry according to standard protocols. Briefly, cells were washed twice in PBS, stained with propidium iodide (PI) solution for 30 min at 37 °C, analyzed by flow cytometry using FlowJo 10.

Immunohistochemical staining

Tumor and normal tissues of three BLCA patients were obtained from Peking University People’s Hospital with ethics committee approval. We performed immunohistochemical staining steps followed as each instruction of products. The tissues were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in graded ethanol and incubated with EDTA (pH = 9.0, Maxim Biotech) buffer for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 6% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. After washing with PBS three times, sections were incubated with primary antibody (MTHFD2, 1:100, mouse, Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. Then sections were further incubated with a secondary antibody EnVision™+/HRP labelled anti-rabbit antibody (Dako) for half an hour. DAB method was used for color development.

Two pathologists were blinded to the clinical information of specimens, they classified staining intensity into 4 grades: 0 (no staining of cancer cells), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), and 3 (strong staining). The percentage of positive cells was divided into 5 grades: 0–4 (0, < 25%, 26–50%, 51–75, > 76%). The IHC score was determined as the staining intensity multiplying the percentage of positive cells.

Statistical analysis

R(v.3.6.3) was applied for all data processing and statistical analysis. RNA-seq analysis of differential expression in UCB tissues (n = 414) and normal bladder tissues (n = 19) was performed with DEseq2. Genes with an absolute log2 fold change (log2FC) > 0.7 and adjusted p-value (p.adjust) <  0.01 were considered as differentially expressed genes. Then we ranked 56,493 genes from UCB samples in TCGA by their relative MTHFD2 expression in the top 50th percentile and the bottom 50th percentile for GSEA using a clusterProfiler package. We perform GSEA analysis of essential pathways in UMUC10 and BFTC905 cell lines in the same way. The C2.cp.v7.2.symbols.gmt was utilized for GSEA with the random combinatorial count set as 1000. Gene set collections were acquired from MsigDB. Moreover, false discovery rate (FDR) <  0.25 with p.adjust < 0.05 was considered significant.

The association between MTHFD2 expression and clinicopathological features was analyzed by the Mann Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis H test using a ggplot2 package. The probabilistic receiver-operating characteristic (pROC) Package was applied to plot ROC curve. For Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the survival and survminer packages were utilized to conduct the survival analysis based on MTHFD2 expression along with some clinical features. We determined the cut-off value of MTHFD2 expression by its median. p <  0.05 was considered to be significant (ns, p ≥ 0.05; *, p <  0.05; **, p <  0.01; ***, p <  0.001).


Clinical characteristics of patients with UCB

The clinical information of 414 patients with UCB in TCGA is presented in Table 1. There were 234 (56.5%) patients less than or equal to 70 years old at the time of diagnosis and 180 (43.5%) patients over 70 years old, with 109 (26.3%) females and 305 (73.7%) males. As for race information, 330 (83.1%) patients were white, 44 (11.1%) were Asian, and 23 (5.8%) were black or African American. In terms of body mass index, 153 (42.0%) patients were less than or equal to 25, and 211 (58.0%) patients were over 25. As for subtype, there exited 134 (32.8%) patients with non-papillary UCB and 275 (67.2%) patients with papillary UCB. Among these patients, 292 (72.8%) patients were smokers, and the other 109 (27.2%) patients were not.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder in TCGA

Overall, 5 (1.3%) patients were at T stage I, 119 (31.3%) patients at stage II, 196 (51.6%) patients at stage III, and 60 (15.8%) patients at stage IV. Additionally, 239 (64.6%) patients were diagnosed with clear N stage, and 131 (35.4%) patients had lymph node metastases. Distant metastasis occurred in 11 (5.2%) patients, and the other 202 (94.8%) patients showed no distant metastasis. There were 21 (5.1%) patients diagnosed with low grade and 390 (94.9%) patients with high grade. The pathologic stage of 412 patients was available, among which 4 (1.0%) patients were at stage I, 130 (31.6%) patients at stage II, 142 (34.5%) patients at stage III, and 136 (33.0%) patients at stage IV. The median follow-up of the 414 patients alive at the time of the last contact was 21.2 months (ranged from 0 to 169 months).

MTHFD2 was upregulated in various cancer types including UCB

As reflected by TIMER analysis, MTHFD2 expression was considerably augmented in multiple types of cancers, like BLCA, breast cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (Fig. 1A). Through RNA-seq analysis of differential expression, upregulated genes were filtered by log2FC > 0.7 and FDR <  0.01in UCB, and notably MTHFD2 was considered to be statistically significant (log2FC = 0.789 and FDR = 0.002) (Fig. 1B, Table S1). Furthermore, the results of western blot analysis manifested higher expression of MTHFD2 in human BLCA cells (BIU-87, 5637, EJ, T24, and TCCSUP) than SV-HUC-1 cells (Fig. 1C). We also performed quantification gel analysis on the WB results. We obtained that the densities of BLCA cell bands was significantly higher than that of the SV-HUC-1 (control) cells band (Fig. 1C). By comparing 414 UCB samples and 19 normal bladder tissue samples from RNA-seq data, the unpaired tissue contrast displayed that MTHFD2 expression was elevated in UCB samples (p = 3.8e-4) (Fig. 1D). The same results were seen in the comparison between 19 UCB samples and their paired normal bladder tissue samples (p value = 1.6e-4) (Fig. 1E). In order to make a robust conclusion, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the tumor and normal tissues of three BLCA patients. MTHFD2 was used for staining. It is clearly seen that the tumor tissues have higher MTHFD2 expressions than normal tissues (Fig. 1F), confirming that the MTHFD2 gene expression is elevated in BLCA (Table.S1_F).

Fig. 1
figure 1

MTHFD2 expression in various cancers notably in bladder cancer (ns, p ≥ 0.05; *, p <  0.05; **, p <  0.01; ***, p <  0.001). A Differential expression of MTHFD2 in various types of cancer analyzed by TIMER2.0. B The volcano plot of RNA-Seq analysis of differential expression in UCB tissues and normal bladder tissues. C Higher expression of MTHFD2 in 5637, BIU-87, EJ, T24, and TCCSUP cells than in SV-HUC-1 cells validated by western blot analysis. D Differential expression of MTHFD2 in UCB tissue samples and normal bladder tissue samples. E Differential expression of MTHFD2 in UCB tissue samples and their paired normal bladder tissue samples. F Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the tumor and normal tissues of three BLCA patients. MTHFD2 was used for staining

The association of MTHFD2 expression with clinical features of patient

Moreover, MTHFD2 expression was strongly correlated with T stage (T1&2 vs. T3&4, p <  0.001; Fig. 2A), M stage (M0 vs. M1, p = 0.03; Fig. 2C), histologic grade (low grad vs. high grade, p <  0.001; Fig. 2D), pathologic stage (stage I-II vs. stage III-IV, p <  0.001; Fig. 2E), tumor subtype (papillary vs. non-papillary, p <  0.001; Fig. 2F), and human race (p <  0.001; Fig. 2G). Meanwhile, no significant difference was observed between groups stratified by N stage (N0 vs. N1&N2&N3, p = 0.41; Fig. 2B), gender (female vs. male, p = 0.19; Fig. 2H), and age (≤ 70 years old vs. > 70 years old, p = 0.35; Fig. 2I).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Associations of MTHFD2 expression with clinicopathological characteristics of patients (ns, p ≥ 0.05; *, p <  0.05; ***, p <  0.001). A T stage. B N stage. C M stage. D Histologic grade. E Pathologic stage. F Tumor subtype (papillary& non-papillary). G Race. H Gender. I Age

Survival analysis and cox regression analysis

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis documented that the high expression of MTHFD2 evidently diminished the overall survival (OS, p = 0.002, Fig. 3A), disease-specific survival (p = 0.005, Fig. 3B), and progress-free interval (p = 0.005, Fig. 3C) of patients with UCB. Table 2 and Fig. 3D depicted the results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for theDSS of patients with UCB. From the univariate Cox regression model, subtype [papillary versus non-papillary, the hazard ratio (HR) = 1. 734 (1.115–2.695), p = 0.015)], lymphovascular invasion [HR =3.048 (1. 894–4.905), p <  0.001], and MTHFD2 expression [HR = 1.673 (1.168–2.397), p = 0.005] were associated with the DSS of patients with UCB (Fig. 3D). Missing values were removed from further analysis, and remaining samples were included. Subsequent to adjustment of multivariate Cox regression. Lymphovascular invasion [HR = 2.971 (1.836–4.810), p <  0.001], and MTHFD2 expression [HR = 1.598 (1.022–2.499), p = 0.04] were considered to be independent prognostic factors for the DSS of patients with UCB (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Survival analysis and forest plot of multivariate Cox regression analysis. The influence of MTHFD2 expression on survival was analyzed: A Overall survival. B Disease-specific survival. C Progress-free interval. D Forest plot of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis on disease-specific survival

Illustration of the high expression level of of MTHFD2 by GSEA

Totally 508 gene sets were found to be substantially enriched in MTHFD2 high expression phenotype from different pathway databases (Table S2). Partial gene sets of interest were visualized. We focused on those gene sets which were associated with cancer growth, progression, and metastasis, such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation, mitotic phases, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), cancer immunotherapy by programmed death 1 (PD1) blockade, signaling pathway by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cancer, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family signaling cascades, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), senescence, and autophagy in cancer pathways (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Enrichment plots from gene set enrichment analysis. Gene sets enriched in MTHFD2 high expression phenotype were analyzed: A NF-κB activation. B Mitotic metaphases and anaphase. C Mitotic prometaphases. D JAK/STAT. E Cancer immunotherapy by PD1 blockade. F Signaling by EGFR in cancer. G MAPK family signaling cascades. H PI3K/AKT/mTOR. I Senescence and autophagy in cancer pathways

For further validation of our assumption, we downloaded two sets of RNA-Seq expression data from CCLE (Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia). These two data sets came from the UMUC10 and BFTC905 cell lines (two BLCA cell lines), respectively. The essential pathways like the MAP, STAT, NF-KB, cell cycle and autophagy pathways were examined (Fig. 5A and B). They also exhibited significantly high expression levels and thus were activated in BLCA cells.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of essential pathways in UMUC10 (A) and BFTC905 cell lines (B). P value < 0.05 indicates the expression of genes within this pathway is significantly enriched in this dataset

MTHFD2 expression was correlated with immune infiltrates

Lollipop diagrams indicated that MTHFD2 expression shared strong positive correlation with Th2 cells (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.647, p < 0.001), Th1 cells (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.457, p < 0.001), macrophages (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.450, p < 0.001), aDC (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.341, p < 0.001), and Tgd (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.341, p < 0.001) immune cells. However, CD56bright natural killer cells (Spearman correlation; rho = − 0.394, p < 0.001) exhibited close negative correlation with MTHFD2 expression (Table 3, Fig. 6A). Furthermore, MTHFD2 expression was also strongly associated with immune checkpoint molecules reported in previous studies [25, 26], including PDCD1 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.357, p < 0.001), CD274 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.532, p < 0.001), CTLA4 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.373, p < 0.001), CD276 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.406, p < 0.001), CSF1R (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.387, p < 0.001), IDO1 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.372, p < 0.001), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.471, p < 0.001), HAVCR2 (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.464, p < 0.001), and TIGIT (Spearman correlation; rho = 0.353, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6B).

Table 3 Correlation analysis between MTHFD2 expression and immune checkpoint molecule expression
Fig. 6
figure 6

Immune infiltrate assessment. A Correlation of MTHFD2 expression with immune cell infiltration. B Correlation of MTHFD2 expression with immune checkpoint molecule expression

CCK8 and FACS experiments verified the oncogenic role of MTHFD2

To further experimentally verify the oncogenic role of MTHFD2 gene, we knocked down MTHFD2 with two siRNAs in two BLCA cell lines, respectively (Fig. 7A and B). The OD value detection revealed that the control cells progressed significantly faster than the two si-MTHFD2 cell lines (Fig. 7C and D), suggesting that MTHFD2 might contribute to BLCA cell growth/proliferation. Next, we performed FACS (Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting) of control and si-MTHFD2 cells. We consider that a higher fraction of cells in G1 (gap1) phase represents a less actively dividing state of cells which means less likelihood to promote oncogenesis, while a higher fraction in S (synthesis) phase indicates more dividing cells. Not surprisingly, we observed that control cells had discernibly lower fractions of cells (~ 5% difference) in G1 phase (Fig. 7E and F). This suggests that MTHFD2 might have promoted the transition from G1 to S phase to regulate cell cycle and consequently contribute to the oncogenesis of bladder cancer.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Experimental verification of the oncogenic role of MTHFD2 gene. A, B Knock-down of MTHFD2 by two different siRNAs in two BLCA cell lines. Significance was calculated by. One-way ANOVA *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. C, D The OD value at different time points. Significance was calculated by Two-way repeated measures ANOVA. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. E, F FACS (Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting) of control and si-MTHFD2 cells. Higher fraction in G1 phase represents a less actively dividing state of cells which means less likely to promote oncogenesis


Given the fact that the currently known biomarkers of UCB are still unable to be applied to clinical practice or provide any guidance for the subsequent treatment, it is necessary to discover a novel and reliable biomarker. Early diagnosis of UCB is the key to improve the prognosis of patients. Plenty of researches have reported some prognostic biomarkers for BLCA, including protein biomarkers, genomic biomarkers, epigenetic biomarkers, and transcriptomic biomarkers, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mutation, One cut domain family member 2 (ONECUT2), polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide G (POLR3G), Cyclin A1 (CCNA1), B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), Eomesodermin (EOMES), Vimentin (VIM), and high-temperature requirement A serine peptidase 1 (HtrA1) [27, 28] . Our study results indicated that MTHFD2 was a potential prognostic biomarker of UCB patients, which can be a new choice to be applied in the clinic.

MTHFD2 is a bifunctional enzyme existing in mitochondrion with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-specific dehydrogenase activity [29]. MTHFD2 takes crucial part in mitochondrial folate-mediated one-carbon pathway, and meanwhile, it is consistently overexpressed in embryos and a wide range of tumors [30].

Previous study reported that Carolacton (a natural product of MTHFD2 inhibitor tool compound) was able to restain the growth of different human tumor cell lines [31]. Then, an isozyme-selective MTHFD2 inhibitor, DS18561882, was discovered to repress the proliferation of breast cancer cell lines and the tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model with breast carcinoma upon oral administration [32]. The regulatory factors and mechanisms of elevated MTHFD2 expression in various cancer types need to be clarified, since MTHFD2 is a promising novel target for anti-cancer therapy [33].

The functions of MTHFD2 in UCB have not been previously reported clearly, so we wonder if MTHFD2 also plays a crucial part in BLCA. Our study elaborated that MTHFD2 was highly expressed in various types of tumors, including UCB. The expression of MTHFD2 in UCB tissues was evidently higher than that in normal bladder tissues. We could get the same conclusion in the comparison of both unpaired and paired bladder tissue samples. The result of western blot showed that MTHFD2 expression was higher in UCB cell lines than in the SV-HUC-1 cell line. IHC analysis further confirmed higher expression in BLCA tissue than paired normal bladder tissue. Through these results, we knew that during UCB tumorigenesis, MTHFD2 expression is a cumulative alteration.

Our study uncovered that MTHFD2 upregulation is noticeably associated with high T stage, high M stage, high histologic grade, and high pathologic stage. Those clinical features all predicted the poor clinical outcome. Furthermore, MTHFD2 expression is potently enhanced in non-papillary UCB. It is obvious that compared to papillary subtype, non-papillary UCB is more invasive and that most of them could cause shortened survival due to metastatic spread [34]. Then, we conducted Kaplan Meier survival analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis on the DSS. The result manifested that lymphovascular invasion, and high MTHFD2 expression were considered to be correlated with the poor prognosis, and that MTHFD2 was regarded as an independent prognostic factor for the DSS in patients with UCB.

GSEA was further implemented to decipher the mechanism of MTHFD2 functioning in UCB, the result of which suggested that numerous signaling pathways were enriched in MTHFD2 high expression group, including NF-κB activation, mitotic phases, JAK/STAT, cancer immunotherapy by PD1 blockade, signaling pathway by EGFR in cancer, MAPK family signaling cascades, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and senescence and autophagy in cancer pathways. The essential pathways like the MAP, STAT, NF-KB, and autophagy pathways were also exhibited significantly high expression levels and were activated in BLCA cells such as UMUC10 and BFTC905. Some of them were already reported in other carcinomas by prior works [17,18,19,20, 30]. Our follow-up studies interrogated the molecular mechanisms of MTHFD2 in UCB to find a potential anti-cancer target.

Immunotherapy is a vital part of clinical treatment for UCB. Intravesical BCG has been regarded as the most effective immunotherapy for NMIBC due to its approval by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1990, which is proved to reduce recurrence and prolong survival [35, 36]. As for metastatic UCB, immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently manifested to have good activity and significant efficacy. The first target was CTLA4 that could interact with CD80/86 to restrict T-cell activation [37]. Ipilimumab and tremelimumab, the monoclonal antibodies targeting CTLA4, were developed. Some scientists found that drugs directly against either PD1 or PD-L1 had lower adverse effects than CTLA4 inhibitors for their direct action in tumor microenvironment [38]. The interaction of the PD1 signaling pathway, such as the PD1 receptor and its 2 ligands, activated a cascade of events and decreased cytokine secretion, T-cell activation, and targeted cell lysis [26]. PD1/PD-L1 antibodies, therefore, improved antitumor immunity. PD-L1 inhibitors, Atezolizumab and Durvalumab, were both approved by FDA for the treatment of patients with inoperable or metastatic UCB progressing on platinum-based treatment with positive PD-L1 [39]. A PD1 inhibitor, Pembrolizumab, has been approved in the first-line treatment of UCB patients ineligible for cisplatin with tumor PD-L1 positive [40]. These immune checkpoint inhibitors were exhibited to have significant efficacy and bring obvious survival benefits to patients with metastatic UCB [39].

Above all, the level of immune infiltration is apparently associated with the UCB prognosis. Meanwhile, immune infiltration can be a prognostic indicator of immunotherapy response. Therefore, it is a crucial part of treatment for UCB to identify valid predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We noticed that cancer immunotherapy by PD1 blockade pathway was considerably enriched in MTHFD2 high expression group by GSEA. Then we wonder if MTHFD2 expression is correlated with immune infiltrates.

From the lollipop diagrams, we knew that MTHFD2 expression was positively correlated with Th2 cells, Th1 cells, macrophages, aDC, and Tgd immune cells. It was reported that the efficient response to BCG in UCB required Th1-type immunity, and that Th2-promoting factors could trigger Th1-type immunity contributing to the treatment of BCG [41]. Secondly, tumor-associated macrophages had two functional states including M1 (anti-tumor) and M2 (tumor-promoting). The increased ratio of M1/M0 might correlate to the improved prognosis of UCB [42]. In prior researches, the high level of CD8+ T cells was indicated to trigger the improved prognosis and the augmented possibility of response to immunotherapy, which was the basic mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors [43,44,45]. Of note, CD4+ T cells and dendritic cells were also illustrated to be supportive in this process [46]. Taken together, MTHFD2 expression was significantly associated with the level of those infiltrating immune cells which were indicators of disease prognosis and assumed a central role in immunotherapy for UCB. Moreover, we found that several immune checkpoint molecules exhibited close association with MTHFD2 expression, including PDCD1, CD274, CTLA4, CD276, CSF1R, IDO1, LAG3, HAVCR2, and TIGIT. In summary, MTHFD2 might be a new target of anti-tumor immunity, which contributes to the orchestration of immune cell infiltrates and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. This potential mechanism could demonstrate the reason why improved prognosis was observed in patients with poor MTHFD2 expression. The MTHFD2 inhibitors may provide an effective way for the treatment of UCB.

As the results of CCK8 and FACS experiments shows, MTHFD2 might contribute to BLCA cell growth/proliferation via regulating cell cycle. Our following study will continue to figure out if MTHFD2 could drive tumor cell proliferation, migration, and cycle progression and inhibit cell apoptosis in UCB, just as in other tumors, and to study the potential direct or indirect mechanism. Furthermore, we will research the anti-tumor work of the MTHFD2 inhibitors to find a selective target for immunotherapy.

To our best knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the prognostic role and immune infiltration level of MTHFD2 in UCB

We concluded that MTHFD2 was an independent prognostic factor for the DSS of patients with UCB and could be a potential biomarker of disease prognosis. MTHFD2 also might be a new target of anti-tumor immunity for its strong association with immune infiltration. There are some limitations in this study. Firstly, the clinical data downloaded from TCGA was limited and incomplete. Our study findings need to be validated in larger and multi-center cohort studies. Secondly, the prognostic ability of MTHFD2 in UCB was lack of validation from adequate clinical samples. Otherwise, the anti-tumor mechanisms of MTHFD2 and the potential targets for immunotherapy in UCB need to be elucidated via molecular experiments.


Above all, MTHFD2 expression was elevated in UCB, which could be a potential biomarker of disease prognosis. MTHFD2 also might be a promising novel target for anti-cancer immunotherapy for its strong correlation with immune infiltration.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [TCGA] repository, [], Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) (



American Urological Association


Activated dendritic cells


Bacillus Calmette-Guerin


B cell lymphoma 2


Bladder cancer


Cyclin A1


Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4


Macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor


Epidermal growth factor receptor




False discovery rate


Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3


Fregments Per Kilobase per Million


Gene set enrichment analysis


Single sample gene set enrichment analysis


Glycogen synthase kinase-3


Gene Set Variation Analysis


Hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2


High-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma


Hazard ratio


High-temperature requirement A serine peptidase 1


Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1


Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription


Lymphocyte activation gene 3


Low-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma


Log2 fold change


Mitogen-activated protein kinase


Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2, methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase


Muscle-invasive bladder cancer

mTOR :

Mammalian target of rapamycin

NF-κB :

Nuclear factor κB


Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers


One cut domain family member 2

OS :

Overall survival

PD1 :

Programmed death 1


Programmed cell death protein 1

PI3K :

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase


Polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide G

pROC :

Probabilistic receiver-operating characteristic

RNA-seq :

RNA sequencing


Society of Urologic Oncology


The Cancer Genome Atlas


Telomerase reverse transcriptase

Tgd :

T gamma delta

Th2 :

T helper 2

TIMER2.0 :

Tumor immune estimation resource, version 2


T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain




Transcripts per million


Transurethral resection


Urothelial carcinomas of bladder




  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.

  2. Kaneko S, Li X. X chromosome protects against bladder cancer in females via a KDM6A-dependent epigenetic mechanism. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6):eaar5598.

  3. Chen M, Lv J, Ye J, Cui X, Qu F, Chen L, et al. Disruption of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 inhibits tumorigenesis of urinary bladder cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2017;51(1):39–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sim W, Iyengar P, Lama D, Lui S, Ng H, Haviv-Shapira L, et al. C-met activation leads to the establishment of a TGFβ-receptor regulatory network in bladder cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee S, Hu W, Matulay J, Silva M, Owczarek T, Kim K, et al. Tumor evolution and drug response in patient-derived organoid models of bladder Cancer. Cell. 2018;173(2):515–528.e517.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiss B, van den Berg N, Ertsey R, McKenna K, Mach K, Zhang C, et al. CD47-targeted near-infrared Photoimmunotherapy for human bladder Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(12):3561–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamoun A, de Reyniès A, Allory Y, Sjödahl G, Robertson A, Seiler R, et al. A consensus molecular classification of muscle-invasive bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):420–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Song Y, Jin D, Ou N, Luo Z, Chen G, Chen J, et al. Gene expression profiles identified novel urine biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamat AM, Willis DL, Dickstein RJ, Anderson R, Nogueras-González G, Katz RL, et al. Novel fluorescence in situ hybridization-based definition of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) failure for use in enhancing recruitment into clinical trials of intravesical therapies. BJU Int. 2016;117(5):754–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1021–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shariat SF, Tokunaga H, Zhou J, Kim J, Ayala GE, Benedict WF, et al. p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1014–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee SJ, Datar R, Youssefzadeh D, George B, Goebell PJ, Stein JP, et al. Combined effects of p53, p21, and pRb expression in the progression of bladder transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1007–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karam JA, Lotan Y, Karakiewicz PI, Ashfaq R, Sagalowsky AI, Roehrborn CG, et al. Use of combined apoptosis biomarkers for prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(2):128–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitra AP, Lerner SP. Potential role for targeted therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: lessons from the cancer genome atlas and beyond. Urol Clin North Am. 2015;42(2).

  15. Minoli M, Kiener M, Thalmann GN, Kruithof-de Julio M, Seiler R. Evolution of urothelial bladder Cancer in the context of molecular classifications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(16):5670.

  16. Soria F, Krabbe L-M, Todenhöfer T, Dobruch J, Mitra AP, Inman BA, et al. Molecular markers in bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei Y, Liu P, Li Q, Du J, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. The effect of MTHFD2 on the proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cell lines. OncoTargets Ther. 2019;12:6361–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang J, Qin Y, Lin C, Huang X, Zhang F. MTHFD2 facilitates breast cancer cell proliferation via the AKT signaling pathway. Exper Therapeutic Med. 2021;22(1):703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi Y, Xu Y, Yao J, Yan C, Su H, Zhang X, et al. MTHFD2 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(14):7013–27.

  20. Li Q, Yang F, Shi X, Bian S, Shen F, Wu Y, et al. MTHFD2 promotes ovarian cancer growth and metastasis via activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway. FEBS open bio. 2021;11(10):2845–57.

  21. Liu X, Liu S, Piao C, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Jiang Y, et al. Non-metabolic function of MTHFD2 activates CDK2 in bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(12):4909–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li T, Fu J, Zeng Z, Cohen D, Li J, Chen Q, et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(W1):W509–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hänzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Waldner M, Obenauf AC, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013;39(4):782–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghasemzadeh A, Bivalacqua TJ, Hahn NM, Drake CG. New strategies in bladder Cancer: a second coming for immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(4):793–801.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou TC, Sankin AI, Porcelli SA, Perlin DS, Schoenberg MP, Zang X. A review of the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint in bladder cancer: from mediator of immune escape to target for treatment. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(1):14–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan WS, Tan WP, Tan M-Y, Khetrapal P, Dong L, deWinter P, et al. Novel urinary biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;69:39–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu X, Zhang W, Wang H, Lai C, Xu K, Hu H. Increased expression of POLR3G predicts poor prognosis in transitional cell carcinoma. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Christensen KE, Mirza IA, Berghuis AM, Mackenzie RE. Magnesium and phosphate ions enable NAD binding to methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(40):34316–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Green N, Galvan D, Badal S, Chang B, LeBleu V, Long J, et al. MTHFD2 links RNA methylation to metabolic reprogramming in renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38(34):6211–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fu C, Sikandar A, Donner J, Zaburannyi N, Herrmann J, Reck M, et al. The natural product carolacton inhibits folate-dependent C1 metabolism by targeting FolD/MTHFD. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawai J, Toki T, Ota M, Inoue H, Takata Y, Asahi T, et al. Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally available MTHFD2 inhibitor (DS18561882) with in vivo antitumor activity. J Med Chem. 2019;62(22):10204–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu Z, Leung GKK. More than a metabolic enzyme: MTHFD2 as a novel target for anticancer therapy? Front Oncol. 2020;10:658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo CC, Dadhania V, Zhang L, Majewski T, Bondaruk J, Sykulski M, et al. Gene expression profile of the clinically aggressive micropapillary variant of bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70(4):611–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamat AM, Porten S. Myths and mysteries surrounding bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):267–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kamat AM, Briggman J, Urbauer DL, Svatek R, Nogueras González GM, Anderson R, et al. Cytokine panel for response to Intravesical therapy (CyPRIT): nomogram of changes in urinary cytokine levels predicts patient response to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):197–200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Donin NM, Lenis AT, Holden S, Drakaki A, Pantuck A, Belldegrun A, et al. Immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2017;197(1):14–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fakhrejahani F, Tomita Y, Maj-Hes A, Trepel JB, De Santis M, Apolo AB. Immunotherapies for bladder cancer: a new hope. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(6):586–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zichi C, Tucci M, Leone G, Buttigliero C, Vignani F, Pignataro D, et al. Immunotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial Cancer: current evidence and future perspectives. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5618174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zucali PA, Cordua N, D'Antonio F, Borea F, Perrino M, De Vincenzo F, et al. Current perspectives on immunotherapy in the Peri-operative setting of muscle-infiltrating bladder Cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:568279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pichler R, Gruenbacher G, Culig Z, Brunner A, Fuchs D, Fritz J, et al. Intratumoral Th2 predisposition combines with an increased Th1 functional phenotype in clinical response to intravesical BCG in bladder cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66(4):427–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou X, Qiu S, Nie L, Jin D, Jin K, Zheng X, et al. Classification of muscle-invasive bladder Cancer based on Immunogenomic profiling. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Farhood B, Najafi M, Mortezaee K. CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes in cancer immunotherapy: a review. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):8509–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ali HR, Chlon L, Pharoah PDP, Markowetz F, Caldas C. Patterns of immune infiltration in breast Cancer and their clinical implications: a gene-expression-based retrospective study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(12):e1002194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. de Andrea CE, Schalper KA, Sanmamed MF, Melero I. Immunodivergence in metastatic colorectal Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(6):876–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sato Y, Bolzenius JK, Eteleeb AM, Su X, Maher CA, Sehn JK, et al. CD4+ T cells induce rejection of urothelial tumors after immune checkpoint blockade. JCI Insight. 2018;3(23):e121062.

Download references


We acknowledge and appreciate our colleagues for their valuable suggestions and technical assistance for this study.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81970660).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LZ finished Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. XL finished Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. WZ finished Funding acquisition, Formal analysis. HH and QW finished Investigation. KX finished Project administration, Supervision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kexin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. The processing of clinical tissue samples is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. No consent was required as experimental data with no personal identifiers was used.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Liu, X., Zhang, W. et al. MTHFD2 is a potential oncogene for its strong association with poor prognosis and high level of immune infiltrates in urothelial carcinomas of bladder. BMC Cancer 22, 556 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Urothelial carcinomas of bladder
  • MTHFD2
  • The Cancer Genome Atlas website
  • Biomarker
  • Immune infiltrates
  • Prognosis