Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Distribution of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells against CD19 in B-cell malignancies

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 198 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The unprecedented efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy of CD19+ B-cell malignancies has opened a new and useful way for the treatment of malignant tumors. Nonetheless, there are still formidable challenges in the field of CAR-T cell therapy, such as the biodistribution of CAR-T cells in vivo.

Methods

NALM-6, a human B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) cell line, was used as target cells. CAR-T cells were injected into a mice model with or without target cells. Then we measured the distribution of CAR-T cells in mice. In addition, an exploratory clinical trial was conducted in 13 r/r B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) patients, who received CAR-T cell infusion. The dynamic changes in patient blood parameters over time after infusion were detected by qPCR and flow cytometry.

Results

CAR-T cells still proliferated over time after being infused into the mice without target cells within 2 weeks. However, CAR-T cells did not increase significantly in the presence of target cells within 2 weeks after infusion, but expanded at week 6. In the clinical trial, we found that CAR-T cells peaked at 7–21 days after infusion and lasted for 420 days in peripheral blood of patients. Simultaneously, mild side effects were observed, which could be effectively controlled within 2 months in these patients.

Conclusions

CAR-T cells can expand themselves with or without target cells in mice, and persist for a long time in NHL patients without serious side effects.

Trial registration

The registration date of the clinical trial is May 17, 2018 and the trial registration numbers is NCT03528421.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is drawing more and more attention for treating relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies, including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) [1,2,3]. The approval of three CAR-T cell products by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Yescarta, Kymriah and Tecartus, have paved the way for the clinical availability of CAR-T cell therapy [4]. CAR-T cell therapy is currently being tested in at least 600 clinical trials worldwide (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Despite its success in patients with B-cell malignancies, there is a lack of substantive understanding of CAR-T cells in the human body. A typical multiphasic disposition profile of CAR-T cells consists of a rapid distribution phase leading to a time-restricted expansion phase, followed by contraction and prolonged persistence phases.

To date, there are no available standardized methods for monitoring in vivo behaviors of injected CAR-T cells. Although various imaging methods, such as radioisotope-labeled cells, genetically engineered cells (e.g., green fluorescent protein expression) and nanoparticle-labeled cells (e.g., iron-dextrannanoparticles), have been applied recently to characterize the distinct pharmacokinetic profiles of CAR-T cells [5], the most commonly used techniques such as flow cytometry, biopsy/immunohistochemistry (IHC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISpot) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cannot be discarded. Because most of the imaging methods can only monitor the CAR-T cells in a short time, common methods for long-time monitoring are needed.

Unlike conventional drugs, CAR-T cells act as a “living drug” that can proliferate in the body. They also exert functions for a significantly longer duration than conventional chemotherapeutics and antibody drugs [6]. Therefore, animal models are generally recommended for evaluating cell therapies because basic information of initial behavior, organ distribution and targeting in vivo after cell infusion are important.

To determine the distribution of CAR-T cells after administration, we conducted in vivo assays using NCG mice with or without tumor cells, and launched a small-scale clinical trial to study the pharmacokinetics of CD19 CAR-T cells in the blood of 13 B-NHL patients.

Methods

Cell culture and CAR-T cell product manufacture

CD19 CAR-T cells were designed for B-ALL and B-NHL by Beijing Immunochina Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. An FMC63-derived CD19-specific scFv, a CD8α-derived hinge and transmembrane domains, and a intracellular domain of CD3ζ with 4-1BB as the co-stimulatory signal domain constitute the CAR molecule. The process of building CAR has been described in the previous work [7]. Briefly, the PCR products of CAR molecules were ligated to the third-generation EF1α promoter-based lentiviral transfer plasmid pLenti6.3/V5 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The transfer plasmid, packaging plasmids (pLP1 and pLP2; Thermo Fisher), and envelope plasmid (pLP/VSVG; Thermo Fisher) were transfected into 293 T cells using polyethyleneimine (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) to prepare the lentivirus. And then, 48 and 72 h after infection, the culture medium was collected, ultrafiltered and purified using Core 700 chromatography (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).

The preparation of CAR T cells has been described in previous work [7]. Briefly, Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from volunteer’ (35 years old, male; for preclinical study) or patients’ (for clinical study) apheresis products, and prepared using Ficoll (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The T cells were isolated and activated using CD3/CD28 magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher). The X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza Group, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 500 U/mL IL-2 was used for T cell culture. After 48 h, the cells were transfected with lentivirus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5. When CAR-T cells were cultured to sufficient numbers for testing or patient infusion, the cells were harvested. Then, the cells were suspended in cryopreserved solution at a density of 2 × 107/mL and stored in a cell cryopreserved bag. Before transferring to liquid nitrogen for preservation, we use a programmed temperature drop apparatus to cool the cells.

NALM-6 (B-ALL cell line) purchased from ATCC in December 2016 (ATCC, Clone G5, CRL-3273™, 63943809), was cultured in RPMI 1640 containing fetal bovine serum (FBS; 10%, Wisent), L-glutamine (2 mmol/L, Gibco) and antibiotic-antimycotic (100×, Gibco). In the COA of cell line provided by ATCC, NALM-6 had been authenticated by STR analysis. Before being used in the experiment, the cells tested negative for mycoplasma.

Cell viability was determined by trypan blue staining with a staining time not more than 2 min.

Biodistribution of CAR-T cells in NCG mice

Immunodeficient NCG (NOD/ShiLtJGpt-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/Gpt) mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from GemPharmatech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). All animal studies were approved by the Tsinghua University Animal Care and Use Committee (Beijing, China).

To detect the distribution of CAR-T cells without target cells, CD19 CAR-T cells (1 × 107) in saline were intravenously injected into normal NCG mice, while mice treated with saline only served as controls. Three hours, D2, D8 and D15 after CAR-T infusion, thiopentone sodium was intraperitoneally injected into the mice for anesthesia. After anesthesia, blood was collected from the large vein behind the abdominal cavity with a volume of about 0.5 mL (anticoagulants), and the remaining blood cells were removed by heart perfusion. Heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, spleen, brain, stomach, duodenum, uterus, ovaries, testis, epididymis, bone marrow, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle were collected for CAR-T cell detection.

To establish a B-ALL model, the NCG mice were injected with 1 × 106 NALM-6 cells via the tail vein. Five days later, the mice were intravenous injected with 5 × 106 CD19 CAR-T cells in saline. Five minutes, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, D1, D2, D7, D14, D28, D42 and D56 after CAR-T infusion, blood (anticoagulants) from six animals (3 male, 3 female) was acquired for CAR-T cell detection by qPCR and flow cytometry. At 3 h, D2, D7, D14, D28, D42 and D56 after CAR-T infusion, six animals (3 male, 3 female) were scarified every time and the organs were collected described above for CAR-T cell detection by qPCR.

qPCR for CAR detection

For the qPCR assay to detect CAR-T cells, DNA from different tissues was extracted using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, 69,504) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and DNA concentrations were quantified using UV spectrophotometry and adjusted to a suitable concentration range. Primers and probes for CAR-T cells were designed and synthesized by Biomed Biotech (Beijing, China) as listed in Sup. Table 6. The PCR experimental conditions were: 95 °C for ten minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 55 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 35 s.

Flow cytometry methods for CAR detection

To validate the CAR transduction efficacy and the changes of CAR T-cells in the blood after injection, we performed flow cytometry assay.

For CAR transduction efficacy, CAR-T cells (1 × 106) were suspended in 100 μL Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS; Thermo Fisher) and incubated with PE-conjugated anti-CD3 (BD, Biosciences) and FITC-conjugated anti-CAR (Immunochina Pharmaceuticals) for 30 min. After washing with DPBS twice, the cells were evaluated with FlowJo software (FlowJo 7.6.1).

For CAR-T cell detection, red blood cells were removed using an RBC lysing buffer (Sigma Aldrich, MO) for 5 min, followed by washing and re-suspension in 1× HBSS containing 1% FBS. The separated blood cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD3 (BD, Biosciences) and FITC-conjugated anti-CAR (Immunochina Pharmaceuticals) in 4 °C for 30 min and followed by washing with DPBS containing 1% FBS. Cells were analyzed using BD FACS Callibur cytometry (BD Biosciences). The results were evaluated by FlowJo software.

Clinical trial

An exploratory clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528421) was launched in r/r B-NHL patients who showed primary resistance or recurrence after at least two prior lines of systemic treatment, including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and anthracycline. The study was approved by Peking University Cancer Hospital, which was carried out from May 2018 to Nov 2019. Thirteen patients received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for 3 consecutive days to deplete endogenous lymphocytes before CAR-T cell infusion. Response was evaluated based on the Lugano response evaluation criteria [8]. Peripheral CAR-T cell number, adverse events including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), routine blood analysis, and blood biochemistry were monitored during follow-up study. CTCAE 5.0 (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm) and ASTCT criteria [9] were utilized to grade the adverse events.

Statistical analysis

All data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) of n values, where n corresponds to the number of mice used. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Prism 8). The one-way ANOVA with pairwise comparison was performed to test the differences. A threshold of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Results

CAR-T cells proliferated without target cells in NCG mice

CD19 CAR-T cells containing a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain that can improve the expansion, persistence and antitumor effect of CAR-T cells [7, 10, 11] (Fig. 1a) were produced by Immunochina Pharmaceuticals following the described process (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Basic information of CD19 CAR-T cells. a. The construction of CAR. FMC63-derived scFv with a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain and a CD3ζ signaling domain. b. The manufacturing process of CAR-T products. CD3+ T cells were purified from PBMC and stimulated with CD3/CD28 Dynabeads. The T cells were then transfected with CAR lentivirus within 48 h and cultured for 9 days

Full size image

Most people believed that without target cells in mice, CAR-T cells will disappear in a short time after infusion. To verify this point, we produced CAR-T cells and transferred them into NCG mice through tail veins. One mouse was sacrificed at each set time point indicated in Fig. 2a and organs were collected for the CAR testing by qPCR. The results demonstrated that CAR-T cells still proliferated without target cells in mice. The CAR-T cell number increased markedly in every tissue especially in spleen within 2 weeks (Fig. 2b and Sup. Table 1). The area under the curve (AUC) showed that the spleen had the most CAR copies, which decreased significantly in the order of blood, lung, kidney, liver, heart and bone marrow. In the brain, muscle and reproductive organs, low CAR copies were detected (Fig. 2c and Sup. Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

CAR-T distribution in the NCG mice. a. Flow diagram of the experiment. Mice were sacrificed at 3 h, day2, day8 and day15 after CAR-T infusion and the organs were collected to test the CAR gene copies. b. Changes of CAR-T cells in the organs over time (BM: bone marrow; MLN: Mesenteric Lymph nodes). c. Tissue exposure of CAR-T cells in NCG mice (AUC: Area under the curve; E/U: Epididymis/Uterus; T/O: Testis/Ovary; SI: Small Intestine; SC: Spinal Cord)

Full size image

CAR-T distribution in tumor-bearing mice

To evaluate the distribution of CD19 CAR-T cells with target cells, we chose the NALM-6 tumor-bearing mice and infused CD19 CAR-T cells derived from healthy human donor into the mice. At different time points after CAR-T cell infusion, the whole blood and tissues were gathered for CAR-T cell testing (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

CAR-T distribution in the tumor-bearing mice. a. Flow diagram of the experiment. Blood and organs were taken from the tumor-bearing mice at different times (blood: 5 mins, 30 mins, 1 h and day1; blood and organs: 3 h, day2, day7, day14, day28, day42 and day56) after CAR-T cell infusion. b. Changes of CAR-T cell distribution in the blood over time. DNA from blood was extracted and the CAR gene copies were detected by qPCR. c. Changes of CAR-T cell distribution in the brain, uterus, testis, ovary and epididymis over time. DNA from 5 organs were extracted and the CAR gene copies were detected by qPCR. d. Changes of CAR-T cell distribution in the heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney over time. DNA from 5 organs were extracted and the CAR gene copies were detected by qPCR. e. AUC of CAR-T cells in tissues and whole blood

Full size image

Copies of CAR gene were detected in the peripheral blood of all animals 5 min after CAR-T cell infusion, which subsequently dropped to the lowest level at day 28 after treatment, then increased at day 42, and decreased again at day 56 (Fig. 3b and Table 1).

Table 1 Copies of CAR gene in blood at different time points (copies/μg DNA)
Full size table

Three hours after administration, CAR-T cells were mainly detected in the heart, liver and lung, and the content in the lung was the highest. CAR copies in spleen were detected in all animals 2 days after administration, followed by a slow increase to a peak at day 56. CAR-T cell detection in the other tissues, such as kidney, brain, stomach, duodenum, fat, muscle, colon, testis and epididymis, showed a decreasing trend during 2–14 days, and then gradually increased to the highest level at day 42. According to the results of CAR copy detection in various tissues, the number of CAR copies in most tissues increased at day 42 after administration, indicating that the activation and amplification of CAR-T cells appeared in most tissues (Fig. 3c/d and Sup. Table 3).

In general, the statistical data showed that CAR-T cells were mostly distributed in the spleen, followed by lung, fat, stomach, epididymis, liver, muscle, kidney, testis, blood, duodenum, bone marrow, heart and other tissues. The organ distribution of CAR-T cells in tumor-bearing mice was consistent with the distribution of cell products in vivo (Fig. 3e and Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of CAR-T parameters in tissues and whole blood (Mean)
Full size table

CAR-T distribution and safety in NHL patients

Thirteen patients, 6 of whom were included in another paper to compare the effect of different co-stimulatory domains on the clinical outcomes of CD19 CAR-T cells [8], with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), were enrolled in this clinical trial. The characteristics of the patients are showed in Table 3.

Table 3 Patient characteristics and treatment
Full size table

All patients underwent the preconditioning regimen to deplete endogenous lymphocytes before CAR-T cell infusion. After CAR-T cell infusion, the patients were followed by monitoring disease response, peripheral CAR-T cell number, and adverse events including CRS and ICANS, routine blood analysis, and blood biochemistry (Fig. 4a). The first response evaluation was on day 28, the complete remission (CR) rate was 46% (6/13), and 2 of the CR patients maintained remission for more than 15 months (Fig. 4b). PET-CT of Patient F0121 and F0122 showed that CD19 CAR-T cells could eliminate tumor cells effectively (Fig. 4c). We also monitored the level of CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood of each patient after CAR-T cell therapy, and found that B cell aplasia was induced by CAR-T cells (Fig. 4d). Expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood was found in all patients, which reached the peak on day 7 to day 21. The persistence of CAR-T cells was detected up to 420 days (Fig. 4e and Sup. Table 4). The average peak concentration of CAR-T cells was about 108/L (Fig. 4f and Sup. Table 5). Based on the clinical response of each patient on day 28 after CAR-T infusion, we divided the patients into three groups: CR, Partial Response (PR) group, and Progressive Disease (PD) group. The peak number of CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood of patients in each group was analyzed. We observed that the PD group showed relatively lower CAR-T cell peak value compared with the other two groups. However, the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 4g).

Fig. 4
figure 4

CAR-T distribution in NHL patients. a. Flow diagram of the experiment. After CAR-T cell infusion, 13 patients were followed by monitoring disease response, peripheral CAR-T cell number, adverse events including CRS and ICANS, routine blood analysis, and blood biochemistry. b. DOR of 13 patients. The first response was evaluated on day 28 and the longest monitoring duration was 15 months(DOR: Duration of Response). c. PET-CT data of Patient F0121 and F0122 at baseline and day 28 after CAR-T infusion. The tumors indicated by red arrows (Parameter: WW200 WL60 Fusion-70% SUVrange-0 to 6). d. The level of CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood of each patient after CAR-T cell therapy. e. Changes of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood after infusion in 13 patients. Red blood cells were removed followed by washing and re-suspension. The separated cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD3 and FITC-conjugated anti-CAR. Data were acquired from the stained cells using BD FACS Callibur cytometry. The results were evaluated with FlowJo software. f. Average CAR-T cell peak in 13 patients. The average peak concentration of CAR-T cells was about 108/L detected by FACS. g. The peak number of CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood of patients in CR, PR and PD groups

Full size image

About 53.8% (7/13) of the patients underwent grade 1 CRS and one of them developed to grade 2. The average duration of severe cytopenia events was 9.55 days, with a range from 2 to 32 days. The patients with severe cytopenia received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as the only therapeutic intervention. The average duration of medication was 5.36 days, with a range from 1 to 12 days. All patients recovered from the adverse events after clinical intervention. None of the patients experienced ICANS [12]. Other side effects are summarized in Table 4. All the adverse events were effectively controlled within 2 months.

Table 4 List of other adverse events
Full size table

Discussion

CAR-T cell therapy is an effective new treatment for tumors [13,14,15] and three CAR-T cell products have been approved for clinical use by the US FDA [16]. But the distribution and location of the cells remain unclear in vivo. The influence of CAR-T cell peak in blood on the efficacy of CAR-T cell treatment also needs further investigation. Therefore, we conducted the preclinical and clinical study to investigate the distribution of CAR-T cells.

In our tumor-bearing mouse model, CAR-T cells were widely distributed in the organs well-perfused with blood, including the spleen, lung, fat, stomach, epididymis, liver, muscle, kidney, testis, duodenum, bone marrow and heart. They extensively spread to all over the organs from 4 weeks after administration and peaked between 6 and 7 weeks after administration. CAR-T cells also dramatically proliferated in NCG mice without target cells. One reason to explain the phenomenon might be that the T cell receptor (TCR) of CAR-T cells recognized xenogeneic Major Histocompatibility Complex I (MHCI) in mice and thus CAR-T cells were stimulated to proliferate. But this is only a hypothesis that requires experimental data to support its validity.

The process of T cell distribution is complicated, such as rolling and adhesion on vascular endothelial cells, chemokine-driven extravasation, and margination to specific tissues [17]. In different species, the process and characteristics of distribution could be diverse. So, we studied the CAR-T cell number in the blood of patients. Notably, in our study, the dynamic changes and peaks of CAR-T cells were not directly associated with the therapeutic efficacy, and the adverse events were inconsistent with the published literature [10, 18,19,20].

To summarize, we demonstrated that CAR-T cells can locate in different organs in mice, which indicated that CAR-T cells may also distribute in the tissues of humans. In this study, we only focused on understanding the quantitative changes of CAR-T cells in the blood of patients. Evaluation of the whole-body disposition of CAR-T cells in humans will be the next step to clarify the relationship between distribution and efficacy of CAR-T cells. To date, many new techniques have been developed to monitor the cellular location in human body, such as positron emission tomography (PET) [21, 22], bioluminescence imaging (BLI) [23] and so on. PET imaging of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase 1 (HSV1-TK+) CAR-T cells co-expressing the CAR and the reporter gene of HSV1-TK within the same cell has been tested in patients with glioma [24]. We may detect the distribution of CD19 CAR-T cells in human body using one of these methods in the future.

Early translation of CAR-T cells in human must focus on safety and efficacy [25]. Some clinical studies about CAR-T cell therapy have indicated that severe and occasional fatal toxicities may occur [26,27,28]. CRS is the major toxicity [29]. ICANS is also emerging as a challenge for CAR-T cell therapies [30, 31]. Therefore, the prediction of side effects and efficacy is a significant project worth studying, and distribution research may lead to an important breakthrough.

Conclusions

CAR-T cells can expand themselves with or without target cells in mice, and persist for a long time in NHL patients without serious side effects. The future direction is to explore the correlation between the expansion, distribution and clinical outcomes of patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells.

Availability of data and materials

Please see the supplementary files.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area Under The Curve

B-ALL:

B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

B-NHL:

B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

BLI:

Bioluminescence Imaging

CAR:

Chimeric Antigen Receptor

CRS:

Cytokine Release Syndrome

CR:

Complete Remission

DLBCL:

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

FL:

Follicular Lymphoma

G-CSF:

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

ICANS:

Immune Effector Cell-associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome

MHCI:

Major Histocompatibility Complex I

MZL:

Marginal Zone Lymphoma

PBMCs:

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PD:

Progressive Disease

PET:

Positron Emission Tomography

PR:

Partial Response

RCL:

Replication-competent Lentivirus

TCR:

T Cell Receptor

References

  1. Quintas-Cardama A. CD19 directed CAR T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9(52):29843–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quintas-Cardama A. CAR T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(11):1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ying Z, et al. Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) CD19 CAR-T therapy for adults with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma in China. Cancer Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3686.

  4. FDA Approves Second CAR T-cell Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(1):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2017-155.

  5. Wen H, et al. Preclinical safety evaluation of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells against CD19 in NSG mice. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(23):735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weist MR, et al. PET of adoptively transferred chimeric antigen receptor T cells with (89)Zr-Oxine. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(10):1531–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ying Z, et al. Parallel comparison of 4-1BB or CD28 co-stimulated CD19-targeted CAR-T cells for B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2019;15:60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheson BD, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee DW, et al. ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(4):625–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ying Z, et al. A safe and potent anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Nat Med. 2019;25(6):947–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Su T, et al. The clinical outcomes of fresh versus cryopreserved CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Cryobiology. 2020;96:106–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheth VS, Gauthier J. Taming the beast: CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy for ALL. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01134-4.

  13. Zheng PP, Kros JM, Li J. Approved CAR T cell therapies: ice bucket challenges on glaring safety risks and long-term impacts. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frey N. Cytokine release syndrome: who is at risk and how to treat. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2017;30(4):336–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith L, Venella K. Cytokine release syndrome: inpatient Care for Side Effects of CAR T-cell therapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017;21(2 Suppl):29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Titov A, et al. The biological basis and clinical symptoms of CAR-T therapy-associated toxicites. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(9):897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khot A, et al. Measurement and quantitative characterization of whole-body pharmacokinetics of exogenously administered T cells in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019;368(3):503–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for Acute Lymphoid Leukemia; Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Sustained Remissions in Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(10):998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grupp SA, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(16):1509–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Emami-Shahri N, et al. Clinically compliant spatial and temporal imaging of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keu KV, et al. Reporter gene imaging of targeted T cell immunotherapy in recurrent glioma. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(373):eaag2196.

  22. Moroz MA, et al. Comparative analysis of T cell imaging with human nuclear reporter genes. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(7):1055–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobrenkov K, et al. Monitoring the efficacy of adoptively transferred prostate cancer-targeted human T lymphocytes with PET and bioluminescence imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(7):1162–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berger C, et al. Analysis of transgene-specific immune responses that limit the in vivo persistence of adoptively transferred HSV-TK-modified donor T cells after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2006;107(6):2294–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gauthier J, Turtle CJ. Insights into cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after CD19-specific CAR-T cell therapy. Curr Res Transl Med. 2018;66(2):50–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. 2019;34:45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neelapu SS. Managing the toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(Suppl 1):48–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirayama AV, Turtle CJ. Toxicities of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(S1):S42–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen AD, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(6):2210–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chou CK, Turtle CJ. Assessment and management of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity following CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(6):653–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Acharya UH, et al. Management of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019;12(3):195–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for all patients who participated in our exploratory clinical studies.

Potential conflicts of interest

HT, LX, QF, HX and DY are employed by Immunochina Pharmaceuticals Co., a company that commercially develops cell therapies. No potential conflicts of interest are declared by the authors.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81870154, 81972807, 81670187, 81970179 and 81700197), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7202025 and 7202026), Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (No. 2018–1-2151, 2020-2Z-2157), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z181100001918019), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan (No. DFL20151001), Science Foundation of Peking University Cancer Hospital (2020–5), Open Project funded by Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing (2019 Open Project-08), and Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation(Y-Young2020–0524).

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81870154, 81972807, 81670187, 81970179 and 81700197) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7202025 and 7202026) support the non-clinical studies;

Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (No. 2018–1-2151, 2020-2Z-2157), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z181100001918019), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan (No. DFL20151001), Science Foundation of Peking University Cancer Hospital (2020–5), Open Project funded by Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing (2019 Open Project-08), and Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation(Y-Young2020–0524) support the clinical study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin-an Lu, Yuqin Song and Jun Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Lymphoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China

    Zhitao Ying, Xiaopei Wang, Wen Zheng, Ningjing Lin, Meifeng Tu, Yan Xie, Lingyan Ping, Chen Zhang, Weiping Liu, Lijuan Deng, Meng Wu, Feier Feng, Xin Leng, Tingting Du, Yuqin Song & Jun Zhu

  2. Beijing Immunochina Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Beijing, China

    Ting He, Feifei Qi, Xuelian Hu, Yanping Ding & Xin-an Lu

Authors
  1. Zhitao Ying
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ting He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaopei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wen Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ningjing Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Meifeng Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lingyan Ping
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Weiping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lijuan Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Meng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Feier Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xin Leng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Tingting Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Feifei Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Xuelian Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yanping Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Xin-an Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yuqin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Jun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SY and ZJ conceived and designed the study; LX2, HX, HT and QF conducted the preclinical experiments; YZ, WX, ZW, LN, TM, XY, PL, ZC, LW, DL and WM performed clinical examinations; LX1, DY, FF, LX, DT, SY and ZJ analyzed and interpreted the data; LX2, YZ, SY and ZJ wrote the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript (LX1 corresponding to Xin Leng).

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin-an Lu, Yuqin Song or Jun Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal study was approved by the Tsinghua University Animal Care and Use Committee (Beijing, China). The clinical study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Drug Clinical Trials of Peking University Cancer Hospital. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants were informed of the possible risks and side effects of the therapy, and provided signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1.

Distribution of CAR-T cells in NCG mice. Table 2. Tissue distribution parameters in NCG mice. Table 3. Distribution of CAR-T cells in tumor-bearing NCG mice. Table 4. Changes of CAR-T cells in the blood of patients over time. Table 5. CAR-T peak in the blood of patients during the therapy. Table 6. Sequences of primers and probes for CAR-T detection

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, Z., He, T., Wang, X. et al. Distribution of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells against CD19 in B-cell malignancies. BMC Cancer 21, 198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07934-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07934-1

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us