This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Characterization of three new serous epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines
- Véronique Ouellet†1,
- Magdalena Zietarska†1,
- Lise Portelance1,
- Julie Lafontaine1,
- Jason Madore1,
- Marie-Line Puiffe1,
- Suzanna L Arcand2,
- Zhen Shen2,
- Josée Hébert3, 4,
- Patricia N Tonin2, 5, 6,
- Diane M Provencher1, 4, 7 and
- Anne-Marie Mes-Masson1, 4Email author
© Ouellet et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 31 January 2008
Accepted: 28 May 2008
Published: 28 May 2008
Cell lines constitute a powerful model to study cancer, and here we describe three new epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cell lines derived from poorly differentiated serous solid tumors (TOV-1946, and TOV-2223G), as well as the matched ascites for one case (OV-1946).
In addition to growth parameters, the cell lines were characterized for anchorage independent growth, migration and invasion potential, ability to form spheroids and xenografts in SCID mice.
While all cell lines were capable of anchorage independent growth, only the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 cell lines were able to form spheroid and produce tumors. Profiling of keratins, p53 and Her2 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses. Somatic TP53 mutations were found in all cell lines, with TOV-1946 and OV-1946 harboring the same mutation, and none harbored the commonly observed somatic mutations in BRAF, KRAS or germline BRCA1/2 mutations found to recur in the French Canadian population. Conventional cytogenetics and spectral karyotype (SKY) analyses revealed complex karyotypes often observed in ovarian disease.
This is the first report of the establishment of matched EOC cell lines derived from both solid tumor and ascites of the same patient.
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is often described as the silent killer or the disease that whispers mainly due to absence of symptoms. This combined with the lack of specific/sensitive markers and/or techniques of screening leads to the diagnosis at late stages of the disease in more than 70% of patients. Unfortunately, the five year survival rate at this point of the disease is less than 30% . Although EOC is not the most prevalent of cancers, it accounts for the highest number of deaths from a gynecologic malignancy.
EOC is a complex disease stratified according to histopathological and morphological criteria. The majority of EOCs are thought to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) that is derived from the coelomic epithelium. OSE is composed of multipotent cells that can differentiate and give rise to tumors of different histopathology types [1, 2]. The latter are defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)  and represent serous, endometrioid, mucinous, clear cell, de Brenner, mixed and undifferentiated subtypes. Serous type tumors are the most common subtype of EOC identified in more than 50% of cases. EOC tumors are graded according to the degree of differentiation of tumor cells which can vary from well (grade 1), moderately (grade 2) or poorly (grade 3) differentiated cells. Finally, EOC tumors are also classified according to the spread of the disease varying from stage I when tumors are confined to the ovaries to stage IV when distant metastases are observed.
Over the past years several laboratories, including ours , have established and characterized cell lines derived from EOC tumors. However, the majority of these EOC cell lines were established from patients ascites [4–29] and only few were derived from solid tumors [4, 12, 30–37]. Moreover, EOC cell lines have rarely been derived from chemotherapy-naive patients while others were established following viral transformation (SV40 Large T antigen) (such as NMSO cell line) [38, 39] or xenograft passage in immunocompromised mice (such as the HEY, HO-8910PM, and AMOC-2 cell lines) [10, 40, 41]. In addition, few cell lines derived from serous EOC tumors are available even though this subtype represents the most frequently occurring histopathology subtype (such as the TOV-81D, FU-OV-1, and HOC1-7 cell lines) [4, 10, 11, 33, 35].
In this study, we describe three new serous EOC cell lines that were derived in our laboratory from either solid tumors or ascites of two chemotherapy-naïve patients. This is the first report characterizing cell lines derived from both solid tumor and ascites of the same patient. Moreover, the molecular and growth characteristics of the three cell lines present some unique features thereby providing the research community with new tools in the study of different aspects of serous EOC.
Sample and Patient data
Tumor samples were collected and banked following surgeries performed within the Division of Gynecologic Oncology at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Hôpital Notre-Dame). The study was approved by the CHUM institutional ethics committee and written consent was obtained from patients prior to sample collection. Stage was determined at the time of surgery. Histopathology and tumor grade were assigned by a pathologist according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria .
Establishment of the cell lines and culture conditions
All primary cultures and cell lines were cultured in OSE medium (Wisent, Qc, Canada) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2.5 μg/ml amphotericin B and 50 μg/ml gentamicin. Cells were incubated in 5% CO2 and 5% O2.
The TOV-1946 cell line was established using the previously described scrape method on tumor tissue from patient 1946 [42, 43]. Briefly, tumor tissue was gently scraped into a 100 mm petri dish containing supplemented OSE medium. TOV-1946 cells were maintained in the same petri dish for the first 40 days and medium was replaced weekly. After 40 days, 80% confluence was attained and TOV-1946 cells were divided into two petri dishes. They were then divided in a proportion of 2:3 once a week for the first 15 passages and 1:2 twice a week thereafter until passage 70. Subsequently, cells were maintained and divided in a proportion of 1:5 twice a week.
The OV-1946 cell line was established from a mass of cells from the ascites of patient 1946. The mass was macro-dissected into small pieces, which were kept in a 100 mm petri dish for 27 days at which point adherent cells reached 80% confluence. Pieces of tissue were then discarded. Cells were divided in a proportion of 2:3 every week for the first 15 passages and then 1:2 twice a week until passage 70. Cells were then maintained and divided in a proportion of 1:5 twice a week.
The TOV-2223 cell line was established from patient 2223 tumor tissue using the collagenase method. Briefly, tumor tissue was macro-dissected onto a 100 mm petri dish containing serum free OSE medium supplemented with 1000 U of collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, ON, Canada). After 3–4 hours at 37°C, cells were resuspended into 8 ml of medium and the remaining tumor tissue pieces were discarded. The medium containing cells was then divided into four 60 mm petri dishes and 10% FBS was added. Cells were divided 1:2 once a week until passage 19 and then twice a week until passage 70. Subsequently, cells were maintained and divided in a proportion of 1:3 twice a week.
For immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses, the following antibodies were used: beta actin AC-15 (ab6276 from Abcam inc. MA, USA), p53 (D0-1) (sc-126 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), anti-c-ErbB2/c-Neu (OP15, Calbiochem, ON, Canada), Keratin 19 Ab-1 (Ms198-P0, Lab Vision Corp., CA, USA), Keratin 7 Ab-2 (MS-1352-P0) and Keratin 8 Ab-4 (MS-997-P0, both from NeoMarker, Medicorp, Qc, Canada).
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumors were sectioned at 4 μm and the slides were stained using the immunoperoxidase method. Briefly, tissue sections were heated at 60°C for 30 minutes, deparaffinized in toluene and rehydrated in an ethanol gradient. Slides were submerged in boiling citrate buffer (0.01 M citric acid adjusted to pH 6.0) and microwaved for 10 min to unmask antigens. A 3% H2O2 treatment was used to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were blocked with a protein blocking serum-free reagent (DakoCytomation Inc., ON, Canada) and incubated with different antibodies for 60 min at room temperature.
The optimal concentration for each primary antibody was determined by serial dilutions. Tissues were incubated with either a secondary biotinylated antibody (DakoCytomation Inc., ON, Canada) or a rabbit anti-goat biotin-conjugated antibody (1:300) (sc-2774, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) for 20 min followed by incubation with a streptavidin-peroxidase complex (DakoCytomation Inc., On, Canada) for 20 min at room temperature. Reaction products were developed using diaminobenzidine containing 0.3% H2O2 as a peroxidase substrate. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin and all sections were observed by light microscopy at 400× magnification. Substitution of the primary antibody with phosphate buffered saline served as a negative control.
Growth rates were assessed as previously described . On day 0, 1 × 105 cells were seeded onto 60 mm petri dishes. On day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 the cells were trypsinized, resuspended in medium and counted using a hemacytometer. Each experiment was performed in triplicate for each harvest and repeated once. Saturation density was defined as the mean maximum number of cells at confluence counted from two independent experiments performed with triplicates and the doubling time was calculated according to the slope of the linear portion of the growth curve.
Anchorage independent growth in soft agarose and three-dimensional culture
Cell lines were assayed for their ability to grow in anchorage independent conditions by culturing 1 × 104 cells in agarose (0.33 g/100 ml OSE complete medium for the upper layer and 0.66 g/100 ml OSE complete medium for the base layer) . Cells were cultured in soft agar for three weeks, colonies were photographed and these were used for counting. Two independent experiments performed in duplicate.
Cell lines were tested for their ability to form three-dimensional aggregates or spheroids as previously described [44, 45]. Briefly, 4000 cells were suspended in 15 μl of OSE complete medium. The droplets of medium containing cells are then placed on the cover of non-coated plastic tissue culture plate. The cover is placed on a dish containing 10 ml of PBS to prevent dehydration of the droplets. The ability to form spheroids was assessed after four days.
Low serum growth
Tumor cell growth in low serum conditions was assessed by plating cells in six well plates in OSE medium supplemented of 1% FBS, 2.5 μg/ml amphotericin B and 50 μg/ml gentamicin and cultured for 21 days. The medium was changed every seven days. The experiments were performed in duplicate.
Migration potential was evaluated using the scratch assay method as previously described [46–48]. Briefly, cells were plated onto a 12 well dish and once the cell confluence reached about 90% wounds were created using a 200 μl plastic tip. In order to evaluate cell migration into the wound, cells were methanol fixed and treated with Giemsa Stain (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., MO, USA) at 0, 8, 24 and 48 hours after creating the wound. The experiments were performed twice in triplicate.
In vitro invasion assay
Cellular invasion was assayed by the ability of cells to invade a synthetic basement membrane (Matrigel, Becton-Dickenson, NJ, USA) using Boyden chambers. Polycarbonate membranes (8 μm pore size) of the upper compartment of transwell culture chambers were coated with 0.4 μg/ml Matrigel. Ovarian cancer cells were trypsinized and resuspended in OSE medium supplemented with 1% FBS. The cell suspension (20 × 103 cells/well) was placed in the upper compartment of the Boyden chamber, and the lower compartment was filled with OSE medium with 5% FBS. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, membranes were methanol fixed and stained with Giemsa Stain (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., MO, USA). Non-invading cells were removed with a cotton swab, while invading cells on the underside of the membrane were counted using an inverted microscope. The experiments were performed in duplicate.
In vivo growth in SCID mice
The tumorigenic potential of cell lines was assessed based on their ability to form tumors in 45 day-old female SCID mice at subcutaneous (s.c.) left gluteal or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection sites. Each mouse was injected with 5 × 106 cells suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The animals were housed under sterile conditions in a laminar flow environment with ad-lib access to food and water. Tumor formation was assessed over 180 days. Animals were sacrificed before neoplastic masses reached limit points established by the Institutional Committee on Animal Protection (CIPA) according to the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
TP53 mutations were detected by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of cell line DNA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify exons 5–9 of TP53 as previously described . Mutations were detected as band shift relative to the wild-type pattern, and confirmed by sequence analysis (McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). If negative by the SSCP assay, samples were sequenced for exons 2–11 (translated region), as previously described . KRAS was investigated by sequencing genomic regions corresponding to codons 12 and 13 as previously described . Microsatellite instability (MSI) was established as previously described .
BRAF exons 11 and 15 were analyzed by SSCP analysis. PCR was performed in a 12.5 μl volume containing 200 ng of genomic DNA; 1.25 μCi of [35S]dATP (Perkin-Elmer, ON, Canada); 1× PCR buffer (Invitrogen, ON, Canada); 2.5 nmol each dCTP, dGTP and dTTP; 0.3 nmol dATP; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 15 pmol of each primer ; and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, ON, Canada). The PCR conditions were 3 min at 95°C, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The reaction products were diluted 2:3 with stop buffer (90% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, 10% bromophenol blue and 10% xylene cyanol) and heated at 95°C for 10 min before loading on a 0.5× MDE (Mandel Scientific, ON, Canada) non-denaturing gel. The products were electrophoresed at 25 W at 4°C for 6 h. Gels were dried at 80°C and autoradiographed at room temperature for 2–3 days on Kodak Biomax MR film (Perkin-Elmer, ON, Canada). Mutations were detected as band shift relative to the wild-type pattern, and confirmed by sequence analysis (McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre).
The common French Canadian founder mutations 4446C>T and 2953delGTAinsC in BRCA1 and 8765delAG, 6085G>T and 3398delAAAAG in BRCA2 were investigated in DNA from patient matched peripheral blood lymphocytes as described [53, 54].
Conventional cytogenetics and Spectral Karyotyping (SKY) of the cell lines
Metaphase preparation and cytogenetic analyses with a trypsin-Giemsa banding technique of the TOV-2223, TOV-1946 and OV-1946 ovarian cancer cell lines were performed according to standard cytogenetic procedures. Clonal chromosomal abnormalities and GTG-banded karyotypes were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature . Metaphase cells from the same culture passage were used for standard and spectral karyotyping of each ovarian cancer cell line. Slide pretreatment, hybridization with the SkyPaint™ human probes and detection were performed with the protocol provided by Applied Spectral Imaging (ASI)  with minor modifications. Spectral images were acquired with a SpectraCube® system (ASI) mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope and analyzed using the SkyView version 1.6.1 software (ASI).
Primary culture, cell line and tumor tissue phenotype
Patient clinical data
Age at diagnosis
Ascitis at surgery
Cause of death
Follow up (months)
Megace (palliative care only)
Hematoxylin-Eosin stained tumor tissue sections of patient 1946 and 2223 (Figure 1G and 1H, respectively) presented typical poorly differentiated tumor masses. While all cell lines exhibited similar cobblestone morphologies typical of epithelial cells, the TOV-2223 cells are larger than the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 cells (Figure 1B,D,F). This reflects morphological differences in the corresponding tumor tissues where cells in the TOV-2223 tumors were larger than those observed in the 1946 tumor (Figure 1G,H).
One of the hallmarks of cancer cells is their ability to grow in the absence of exogenous growth factors, which can be verified by culturing cancer cells in low serum conditions. All cell lines were able to grow in a medium containing only 1% of FBS. In general however, growth rates were slower in low serum conditions than those observed in a typical 10% FBS environments (data not shown).
Solid tumor and cell line expression of keratins, TP53 and HER2
We assessed the expression of p53 and Her2 in both original tumor tissues and cell lines. Tumor tissues from both patients exhibited Her2 expression (Figure 2C and 2G), however the level of expression was stronger in the TOV-2223 tumor tissue (Figure 2G). This is concordant with Her2 expression in the cell lines by western blot analysis (Figure 2I). We also examined p53 expression by immunohistochemistry. Positive staining with the p53 antigen is often indicative of TP53 gene mutation. The tissue from patient 1946 exhibited positive nuclear staining for p53 (Figure 2D) in contrast to that observed with the tumor from the patient 2223 (Figure 2H). p53 positive immunoreactivity was mirrored in the cell lines by western blot (Figure 2I).
Cell growth rate and tumorigenicity assays
Summary of cell line growth characteristics and tumorigenicity
Cell line growth assays
Doubling time (days) +/- S.D.a
1.3 +/- 0.4
2.5 +/- 0.9
2.6 +/- 0.7
1.0 +/- 0.2
Saturation density (nb cells +/- S.D.)b
3 053 933 +/- 153 933
3 231 400 +/- 962 723
2 536 867 +/-680 852
6 162133 +/- 515 034
Number of passages to date
time for wound filling (h)
Mean number of cells +/- S.D.c
417 +/- 226
149 +/- 70
257 +/- 79
118 +/- 34
Colony number +/- S.D.d
11 +/- 3
24 +/- 8
16 +/- 4
27 +/- 10
Capacity to grow in low serum (1%) conditions
Subcutaneous injection in SCID mice
Number of mice with tumors (n = 6)
Mean time of tumor appearance (days)
Intraperitoneal injection in SCID mice
Number of mice with tumors (n = 6)
Mean time of tumor appearance (days)
Number of mice with ascitis
To further characterize the new cell lines, the migration potential was assessed (Table 2 and Figure 3B). TOV-1946 cells migrated faster than the other three cell lines, as they were able to close the wound in 24 hours. The migration patterns of TOV-112D and OV-1946 were similar and filled the wound in 48 hours. However, TOV-2223 migrated more slowly and needed more than 48 hours to close the wound.
Using the modified Boyden chambers, we then measured the capability of the cells to invade through matrigel membranes (Table 2 and Figure 3C). We noted an increase in invasion potential from TOV-112D, OV-1946, TOV-2223 and TOV-1946, where TOV-112D was the least invasive and TOV-1946 the most invasive.
We next monitored the capacity of the cells to form three-dimensional structures in hanging droplets, a method routinely used in our laboratory. Only TOV-112D cells were able to form very compact spheroids, OV-1946 formed less compact spheroids, TOV-1946 cells formed loose aggregates of cells. The TOV-2223 cells were unable to form any aggregates and cells were individually spread across the droplet (Table 2 and Figure 3D).
We next measured the capability of the cell lines to grow in an anchorage independent environment by culturing the cells in soft agarose (Table 2). All cell lines were able to form colonies in soft agarose. The size of the colonies were similar for TOV-112D, TOV-1946 and OV-1946 but were larger than TOV-2223. The number of colonies increased from TOV-1946, TOV-2223, OV-1946 and TOV-112D with TOV-1946 having the lowest number of colonies and TOV112D the highest.
Finally, we monitored the potential of in vivo growth by injecting tumor cells at intraperitoneal or subcutaneous sites in SCID mice (Table 2). Subcutaneous tumors were observed only for the TOV-112D cell line. However, intraperitoneal (IP) tumors were also observed for the TOV1946 and OV1946 cell lines. The TOV-1946 cell line formed tumors in only 3 mice and only after an average of 125 days. The OV-1946 cell line formed tumors more rapidly (average 63 days) and a greater number of tumors (5 mice). The TOV2223 cell lines did not form tumors in mice (Table 2) however one mouse showed very small masses on liver lobes when all mice were sacrificed at approximately seven months post-injection (data not shown).
Mutation status of the new EOC cell lines
Mutations status of the new EOC cell lines
EX5-36 G>A, R175H
EX8+35 C>T, R273C
EX8+35 C>T, R273C
EX4+62 G>A, W53X
Microsatellite Instablility (MSI)
Cytogenetics and Spectral Karyotyping
G-banding composite karyotypes of the three ovarian cancer cell lines
G-banding composite karyotypes
53~71, X, der(X)t(X;2)(q13;q2?3), +der(1)t(1;17)(p3?4;q21), +add(1)(p?21), +add(1)(p12),?i(2)(q10), der(2)t(2;5)(q31;q31), +der(3)t(3;22)(q2?2;q11.2), del(3)(q23), +4, +4, -5, +5, der(6;12)(q10;q10), +add(6)(p11.2), +7, del(8)(p11.2)x2, +del(8)(p21), +9, der(10)t(5;10)(q?31;q26), +11, +add(12)(q11), +add(12)(p11.2), +add(12)(q24), +der(12;14)(p10;q10), add(13)(p11.2), +i(13)(q10), add(14)(p11.2), -15, -15, der(15)add(15)(p11.2)add(15)(q26), add(16)(q22), +add(16)(q22), -17, -17, -18, add(18)(p11.2), del(19)(p13), add(19)(q13), -20, add(21)(p11.2), -22, i(22)(q10), +20mar, inc [cp25]
51~62, X, -X, der(X;12)(q10;q10), del(1)(q41q42), +add(1)(p13), +del(1)(q12), add(2)(q37), t(3;6)(p21;p21), t(3;6)(p21;p21)x2, del(3)(p?14), add(4)(q35), del(5)(p12), +der(5;8)(q10;p10), der(6)t(3;6)(p10;q10)del(6)(q?21), +der(6)add(6)(p25)add(6)(q27), del(7)(q11.2q21), +add(7)(p11.2), add(8)(p11.2), +der(8)?t(8;12)(p12;q13), +9, +del(9)(p21), +der(9)del(9) (p13)add(9)(q32), +10, add(11)(p15)x2, +del(11)(p11.2), del(12)(p11.2)x2, der(13)?t(11;13)(p11.2;p11.2)x2, add(15)(p11.2)x2, + der(15)?t(8;15)(q21;p11.2), -16, add(16)(p13), add(16)(q24), -17, add(17)(p11.2), add(17)(p1?3), add(18)(q23), +19, +add(19)(q13.4), +20, +20, -21, -22,+22,+?22,+20mar,inc[cp22]
57~65, X, -X, der(X;12)(q10;q10), del(1)(q41q42), add(1)(p13), +add(1)(p13), +del(1)(q12), -2, der(2)del(2)(p?14)add(2)(q?31), t(3;6)(p21;p21), del(3)(p?14), +5, +del(5)(q11.2), +7, +add(7)(q11.2), +8, +add(8)(p11.2), +der(8)?t(8;12)(p12;q13), del(9)(p21), add(9)(q32), +add(9)(q32), +der(9)del(9)(p13)add(9)(q32), +10, +add(10)(q26), add(11)(p15)x2, +del(11)(p11.2), del(12)(p11.2), der(13)?t(11;13)(p11.2;p11.2)x2, add(15)(p11.2)x2, +der(15)?t(8;15)(q21;p11.2), add(16)(p13), -17, -17, add(17)(p11.2), add(17)(p1?3), +del(17)(p11.2), -18, +18, +19, +19, +20, +20, -21, +22, +?22, +26mar, inc [cp19]
In order to establish new cellular models of EOC, all samples of ovarian tissues collected for our tumor banks are processed to derive primary cell cultures. Occasionally, some of the primary cultures evolve to become immortal cell lines. So far, we have been successful in establishing seven EOC cell lines , three of which are described here. All cell lines were derived from patients who were never exposed to chemotherapy. This is of importance, since the majority of available cellular models originate from samples obtained following neoadjuvant therapy that could introduce genetic events not related to the biology of the disease.
Early in culture, cell lines presented heterogenous populations of cells that eventually progressed toward a more uniform population of cells with cobblestone-like morphology typical of epithelial cells. All cell lines grew as adherent monolayers without evidence of cellular piling. However, we noted that TOV-2223 cells were more adherent to the petri dish when compared to TOV- and OV-1946. Indeed, a longer trypsinization time is required to detach these cells from the petri dish. Also, when fixed in methanol, a large portion of both 1946 cell lines detached from the solid support while 2223 cells did not (data not shown). The homogeneity of cells observed at passage 0 of OV-1946 could reflect the fact that these cells came from a mass in the patient's ascites that is more homogenous then a tumor mass often composed of, among others, epithelial tumor cells, stromal cells and endothelial cells.
Cell lines were also evaluated on their capacity to survive and grow in low serum conditions. It is worth noticing that although in normal growth conditions both TOV and OV-1946 cell lines present similar growth rates, in low serum conditions the later is almost two times slower. This could be in line with the fact that the OV-1946 cell line comes from ascites which is rich in growth factors and in culture can replace FBS . This cell line could hence be more dependent on growth signals provided by the environment as opposed to cells originating from solid tumors where cells may be predicted to be more self-sufficient.
In epithelial cells, intermediate filaments are composed of keratins that vary according to the differentiation of the cells. Both OSE and EOC tumors are characterized by the expression of different keratins such as KRT7, KRT8 and KRT18. In order to determine if our cell lines presented these EOC markers, we monitored protein expression of Krt7, Krt8 and Krt18 by western blot. When antibodies were appropriate for immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded tissues, we also compared keratins expression in the original tumor tissues. It is also well described that monitoring expression of Krt7 and Krt20 could distinguish between ovarian and gastro-intestinal tract tumors (reviewed in ). Both the 1946 and the 2223 patients presented different epithelium specific Krt expression (Figure 2A and 2E) but did not express Krt20. It is worth noting that the Krt patterns were not all the same between different cell lines. Stronger expression of Krt7 is observed in TOV-1946 and TOV-2223G was the only cell line that expressed Krt18 and Krt8. This underlines the fact that these cell lines are biologically different even though they originate from tissues representing the same type of serous EOC disease. Moreover, Krt7 is also differentially expressed between the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 cell lines that not only originate from the same type of disease but also from the same patient and differences are related to solid tumor versus ascites.
In EOC, 25 to 30% of the tumors present an amplification of the HER2 gene leading to the overexpression of the protein Her2 (reviewed in [2, 61–63]). The overexpression of this growth factor receptor alone was shown to be sufficient to induce malignant transformation and is implicated in ovarian cancer as well as many other types of cancer [64–67]. In EOCs of advanced stage, over 50% of the tumors were shown to be mutated in the TP53 gene (reviewed in [2, 61–63]). All three cell lines showed Her2 protein expression and contained TP53 gene mutations.
Differences in growth rates, migration, invasion and spheroid formation between the TOV-1946 and TOV-2223 underline the diversity of phenotypes that can be observed within the same type of serous EOC disease. The results from the comparison of the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 growth characteristics, demonstrate that these cell lines present with unique phenotypes. Indeed, TOV-1946 cells had a better capability to invade and migrate although their capacity to form spheroid is reduced compared to the OV-1946 cells. One might speculate that cells derived from solid tumor conserve their migration and invasion property but in ascites, these characteristics are less vital. It has been previously shown that cells present in ascites form spheres or aggregates that can adhere to different extracellular matrices as well as to normal human mesothelial cells  but are not always invasive. The role of spheroids in ascites of ovarian cancer patients remains undefined. This is the first report of cell lines derived both from solid tumor and ascites cells of the same patient and further studies on these cell lines may provide useful insights into the biological progression of EOCs.
As both the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 injected mice developed ascites we hypothesize that the ability for cell lines to induce ascites formation in mice is intrinsic to the given cell line and independent of their origin (solid tumor versus ascites). It has been previously shown that the in vivo tumorigenicity can usually be predicted by the ability of the cells to grow in soft agar . The OV-1946 cell line, which was the most tumorigenic, also formed the largest and most numerous colonies when seeded in soft agar (Table 2). In previous studies we have also observed that the capacity of the cells to form compact spheroids is related to their ability to form tumors in vivo . Consistent with this notion, here we show that the OV-1946 cell line formed the most compact spheroids among the new cell lines and formed the greatest number of tumors with the shortest latency in xenograft experiments. However, the TOV-2223 cell line does not even form an aggregate in hanging droplets, only formed small colonies in soft agar and produced no tumors in SCID mice. The tumorigenicity results for TOV-2223 are also consistent with the relative indolent disease observed in patient 2223 who survived a relatively long period post diagnosis without treatment. Indeed, we have previously isolated the TOV-81D cell lines, also from an indolent disease, which failed to form tumors in immuno-compromised mice  suggesting inherent qualities of the tumor that are reflected in its clinical behavior can affect this biological parameter.
The unique features of the described cell lines provide complementary models for different aspects of the disease. For example, while TOV-2223 and the TOV-1946 cell lines are both derived from solid tumors of the same type of serous EOC disease, they vary in important aspects including their aggressiveness and karyotype. They may prove useful for comparative studies to uncover molecular events that distinguish very aggressive from more indolent serous disease in ovarian cancer. Although the TOV-1946 and OV-1946 lines were derived from the same patient, they were collected from the solid tumor and the corresponding ascites respectively. Although common genome modification are shared between these two cell lines (see examples of modifications occurring on chromosome X, 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16) (Table 4), others are unique either to the solid tumor or the ascites derived cell line (chromosome 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22) (Table 4). These observations suggest that the two cell lines acquired common modifications during the earlier steps of tumorigenesis and during cancer progression different rearrangements were selected for, depending on the microenvironment.
The results obtained by SKY and G-banding assays reflect previously published karyotype studies on EOC where high genomic instability is observed . Recently, it as been shown that recurrent rearrangements resulting in the formation of new fusion genes could be identified using genomic and bioinformatic tools [72–75]. So far such studies have been difficult to conduct on solid tumors and hence the importance of appropriate cellular models representing different types of tumors. The future fine cartography of recurrent lesions in these cell lines may provide insights into the molecular events that contribute to EOC initiation and progression.
In conclusion, this paper describes the establishment and characterization of three new serous EOC cell lines derived from two chemotherapy naïve patients. These cell lines are new and important tools in the study ovarian cancer disease, as few cell lines are described to date that represent this frequently diagnosed histopathology type of EOC. The rich characterization of these cell lines, including epithelial marker expression, growth characteristics, mutation and SKY analysis, provide the foundation for future experiments using these new models of EOC.
We are grateful to Véronique Barrès, Louise Champoux, Manon de Ladurantaye and Marise Roy for technical assistance. We thank Sylvie Lavallée and Claude Rondeau (Leukemia Cell Bank of Quebec) for expert technical assistance in cytogenetics and spectral karyotyping. We would like to thank the Gynecologic Oncologist of CHUM for providing specimens. We are grateful to laboratory members for thoughtful discussion. This work was supported by a grant from the Cancer Research Society (CRS) to A.-M.M.-M., P.N.T. and D.M.P. Tumor banking was supported by the Banque de tissus et de données of the Réseau de recherche sur le cancer of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ), affiliated to the Canadian Tumor Repository Network (CTRNet). V.O. was supported by studentships from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canderel Fund of the Institut du Cancer de Montréal. M.Z. was supported by studentship from the Marc Bourgie Fund of the Institut du Cancer de Montréal, the Canderel Fund of the Institut du Cancer de Montréal and the Faculté des études supérieures de l'Université de Montréal.
- Colombo N, Van Gorp T, Parma G, Amant F, Gatta G, Sessa C, Vergote I: Ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006, 60: 159-179. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auersperg N, Wong AS, Choi KC, Kang SK, Leung PC: Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology. Endocr Rev. 2001, 22: 255-288. 10.1210/er.22.2.255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S: Carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003, 83 Suppl 1: 135-166. 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)90118-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Provencher DM, Lounis H, Champoux L, Tetrault M, Manderson EN, Wang JC, Eydoux P, Savoie R, Tonin PN, Mes-Masson AM: Characterization of four novel epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2000, 36: 357-361. 10.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0357:COFNEO>2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DiSaia PJ, Morrow M, Kanabus J, Piechal W, Townsend DE: Two new tissue culture lines from ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1975, 3: 215-219. 10.1016/S0090-8258(75)80006-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fogh J, Trempe G: New human tumor cell lines. Human tumor cell lines in vitro. Edited by: Fogh J. 1975, New York, Plenum PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sinna GA, Beckman G, Lundgren E, Nordenson I, Roos G: Characterization of two human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 1979, 7: 267-280. 10.1016/0090-8258(79)90104-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bast RC, Feeney M, Lazarus H, Nadler LM, Colvin RB, Knapp RC: Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 1981, 68: 1331-1337. 10.1172/JCI110380.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton TC, Young RC, McKoy WM, Grotzinger KR, Green JA, Chu EW, Whang-Peng J, Rogan AM, Green WR, Ozols RF: Characterization of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line (NIH:OVCAR-3) with androgen and estrogen receptors. Cancer Res. 1983, 43: 5379-5389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buick RN, Pullano R, Trent JM: Comparative properties of five human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1985, 45: 3668-3676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill BT, Whelan RD, Gibby EM, Sheer D, Hosking LK, Shellard SA, Rupniak HT: Establishment and characterisation of three new human ovarian carcinoma cell lines and initial evaluation of their potential in experimental chemotherapy studies. Int J Cancer. 1987, 39: 219-225. 10.1002/ijc.2910390216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langdon SP, Lawrie SS, Hay FG, Hawkes MM, McDonald A, Hayward IP, Schol DJ, Hilgers J, Leonard RC, Smyth JF: Characterization and properties of nine human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1988, 48: 6166-6172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Briers TW, Stroobants P, Vandeputte TM, Nouwen EJ, Conraads MV, Eestermans G, Van Bockstaele D, De Broe ME: Establishment and characterization of a human ovarian neoplastic cell line, DO-s. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 5153-5161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Golombick T, Dansey R, Bezwoda WR, Rosendorff J: Establishment and characterization of two new human ovarian cancer cell lines UWOV1 and UWOV2 and a subline UWOV2 (Sf) growing in serum-free conditions: growth characteristics, biochemical, and cytogenetic studies. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1990, 26: 447-454. 10.1007/BF02624086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong WS, Wong YF, Ng YT, Huang PD, Chew EC, Ho TH, Chang MZ: Establishment and characterization of a new human cell line derived from ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1990, 38: 37-45. 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90008-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Golombick T, Bezwoda WR: In vitro maintenance of a new ovarian cancer cell line in protein-free media: a potential model for autonomous growth and tumor progression. Eur J Cell Biol. 1991, 56: 459-463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamada T, Ueda M, Otsuki Y, Ueki M, Sugimoto O: Establishment and characterization of a cell line (OMC-3) originating from a human mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 1991, 40: 118-128. 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90102-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mobus V, Gerharz CD, Press U, Moll R, Beck T, Mellin W, Pollow K, Knapstein PG, Kreienberg R: Morphological, immunohistochemical and biochemical characterization of 6 newly established human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1992, 52: 76-84. 10.1002/ijc.2910520115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grunt TW, Oeller H, Somay C, Dittrich C: Different propensity for spontaneous differentiation of cell clones isolated from the human ovarian surface epithelial cell line HOC-7. Differentiation. 1993, 53: 45-50. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1993.tb00644.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Provencher DM, Finstad CL, Saigo PE, Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, Federici MG, Stockert E, Lloyd KO, Lewis JL: Comparison of antigen expression on fresh and cultured ascites cells and on solid tumors of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1993, 50: 78-83. 10.1006/gyno.1993.1167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirte HW, Kaiser JS, Bacchetti S: Establishment and characterization of four human epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 1994, 74: 900-906. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940801)74:3<900::AID-CNCR2820740317>3.0.CO;2-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buller RE, Niemann T, Connor JP, Squatrito RC, Skilling JS, Anderson B: Isolation and preliminary characterization of an ovarian carcinoma cell line from a patient with familial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995, 56: 39-44. 10.1006/gyno.1995.1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alama A, Barbieri F, Favre A, Cagnoli M, Noviello E, Pedulla F, Viale M, Foglia G, Ragni N: Establishment and characterization of three new cell lines derived from the ascites of human ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol. 1996, 62: 82-88. 10.1006/gyno.1996.0194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JW, Lee CG, Lyu MS, Kim HK, Rha JG, Kim DH, Kim SJ, Namkoong SE: A new cell line from human undifferentiated carcinoma of the ovary: establishment and characterization. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1997, 123: 82-90. 10.1007/BF01269885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mancini A, Borrelli A, Formisano S, Masucci MT, Maffeo A, Perla G, De Martino L, Bevilacqua N, Botti G, Maggino T: Establishment and growth regulation of a novel ovarian cancer cell line from a poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma: proposal for a new treatment. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1999, 20: 45-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bar JK, Harlozinska A: Morphological and phenotypic characterization of a new established ovarian carcinoma cell line (OvBH-1). Anticancer Res. 2000, 20: 2975-2980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Kobayashi Y, Okuma Y, Kondo H, Kanishi Y, Saito K, Kiguchi K: Establishment and characterization of a cell-line originated from human mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary. Hum Cell. 2002, 15: 171-177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saga Y, Suzuki M, Machida S, Ohwada M, Sato I: Establishment of a new cell line (TAYA) of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary and its radiosensitivity. Oncology. 2002, 62: 180-184. 10.1159/000048265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishikawa Y, Yoshida Y, Kawahara K, Kurokawa T, Tajima K, Kotsuji F: Establishment of a novel human ovarian cancer cell line with high anchorage-independent growth ability. Int J Oncol. 2003, 23: 1679-1686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woods LK, Morgan RT, Quinn LA, Moore GE, Semple TU, Stedman KE: Comparison of four new cell lines from patients with adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Cancer Res. 1979, 39: 4449-4459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crickard K, Niedbala MJ, Crickard U, Yoonessi M, Sandberg AA, Okuyama K, Bernacki RJ, Satchidanand SK: Characterization of human ovarian and endometrial carcinoma cell lines established on extracellular matrix. Gynecol Oncol. 1989, 32: 163-173. 10.1016/S0090-8258(89)80028-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imai S, Kiyozuka Y, Maeda H, Noda T, Hosick HL: Establishment and characterization of a human ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma cell line that produces the tumor markers CA-125 and tissue polypeptide antigen. Oncology. 1990, 47: 177-184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van den Berg-Bakker CA, Hagemeijer A, Franken-Postma EM, Smit VT, Kuppen PJ, van Ravenswaay Claasen HH, Cornelisse CJ, Schrier PI: Establishment and characterization of 7 ovarian carcinoma cell lines and one granulosa tumor cell line: growth features and cytogenetics. Int J Cancer. 1993, 53: 613-620. 10.1002/ijc.2910530415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yonamine K, Hayashi K, Iida T: Establishment and characterization of human ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma cell line (SMOV-2), and its cytotoxity by anticancer agents. Hum Cell. 1999, 12: 139-148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emoto M, Oshima K, Ishiguro M, Iwasaki H, Kawarabayashi T, Kikuchi M: Establishment and characterization of a serous papillary adenocarcinoma cell line of the human ovary in a serum-free culture. Pathol Res Pract. 1999, 195: 237-242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aoki D, Suzuki N, Susumu N, Noda T, Suzuki A, Tamada Y, Higashiguchi A, Oie S, Nozawa S: Establishment and characterization of the RMG-V cell line from human ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma. Hum Cell. 2005, 18: 143-146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scoles DR, Pavelka J, Cass I, Tran H, Baldwin RL, Armstrong K, Karlan BY: Characterization of CSOC 882, a novel immortalized ovarian cancer cell line expressing EGFR, HER2, and activated AKT. Gynecol Oncol. 2007, 104: 120-128. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auersperg N, Maines-Bandiera SL, Dyck HG, Kruk PA: Characterization of cultured human ovarian surface epithelial cells: phenotypic plasticity and premalignant changes. Lab Invest. 1994, 71: 510-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nitta M, Katabuchi H, Ohtake H, Tashiro H, Yamaizumi M, Okamura H: Characterization and tumorigenicity of human ovarian surface epithelial cells immortalized by SV40 large T antigen. Gynecol Oncol. 2001, 81: 10-17. 10.1006/gyno.2000.6084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shenhua X, Lijuan Q, Hanzhou N, Xinghao N, Chihong Z, Gu Z, Weifang D, Yongliang G: Establishment of a highly metastatic human ovarian cancer cell line (HO-8910PM) and its characterization. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 18: 233-239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yabushita H, Ueno N, Sawaguchi K, Higuchi K, Noguchi M, Ishihara M: Establishment and characterization of a new human cell-line (AMOC-2) derived from a serous adenocarcinoma of ovary. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989, 41: 888-894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruk PA, Maines-Bandiera SL, Auersperg N: A simplified method to culture human ovarian surface epithelium. Lab Invest. 1990, 63: 132-136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lounis H, Provencher D, Godbout C, Fink D, Milot MJ, Mes-Masson AM: Primary cultures of normal and tumoral human ovarian epithelium: a powerful tool for basic molecular studies. Exp Cell Res. 1994, 215: 303-309. 10.1006/excr.1994.1346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller GM: In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995, 7: 862-869. 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80071-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zietarska M, Maugard CM, Filali-Mouhim A, Alam-Fahmy M, Tonin PN, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM: Molecular description of a 3-D in vitro model for the study of epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2007, In Press:Google Scholar
- Bossolasco M, Veillette F, Bertrand R, Mes-Masson AM: Human TDE1, a TDE1/TMS family member, inhibits apoptosis in vitro and stimulates in vivo tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 4549-4558. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shigeta M, Sanzen N, Ozawa M, Gu J, Hasegawa H, Sekiguchi K: CD151 regulates epithelial cell-cell adhesion through PKC- and Cdc42-dependent actin cytoskeletal reorganization. J Cell Biol. 2003, 163: 165-176. 10.1083/jcb.200301075.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ronot X, Doisy A, Tracqui P: Quantitative study of dynamic behavior of cell monolayers during in vitro wound healing by optical flow analysis. Cytometry. 2000, 41: 19-30. 10.1002/1097-0320(20000901)41:1<19::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcand SL, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM, Tonin PN: OGG1 Cys326 variant, allelic imbalance of chromosome band 3p25.3 and TP53 mutations in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol. 2005, 27: 1315-1320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcand SL, Maugard CM, Ghadirian P, Robidoux A, Perret C, Zhang P, Fafard E, Mes-Masson AM, Foulkes WD, Provencher D, Narod SA, Tonin PN: Germline TP53 mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative French Canadian breast cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007Google Scholar
- Samouelian V, Maugard CM, Jolicoeur M, Bertrand R, Arcand SL, Tonin PN, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM: Chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity profiles of four new human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines exhibiting genetic alterations in BRCA2, TGFbeta-RII, KRAS2, TP53 and/or CDNK2A. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004, 54: 497-504. 10.1007/s00280-004-0843-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W, Davis N, Dicks E, Ewing R, Floyd Y, Gray K, Hall S, Hawes R, Hughes J, Kosmidou V, Menzies A, Mould C, Parker A, Stevens C, Watt S, Hooper S, Wilson R, Jayatilake H, Gusterson BA, Cooper C, Shipley J, Hargrave D, Pritchard-Jones K, Maitland N, Chenevix-Trench G, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Palmieri G, Cossu A, Flanagan A, Nicholson A, Ho JW, Leung SY, Yuen ST, Weber BL, Seigler HF, Darrow TL, Paterson H, Marais R, Marshall CJ, Wooster R, Stratton MR, Futreal PA: Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002, 417: 949-954. 10.1038/nature00766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oros KK, Ghadirian P, Greenwood CM, Perret C, Shen Z, Paredes Y, Arcand SL, Mes-Masson AM, Narod SA, Foulkes WD, Provencher D, Tonin PN: Significant proportion of breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent harbor 1 of 5 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Int J Cancer. 2004, 112: 411-419. 10.1002/ijc.20406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tonin PN, Mes-Masson AM, Futreal PA, Morgan K, Mahon M, Foulkes WD, Cole DE, Provencher D, Ghadirian P, Narod SA: Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in French Canadian breast and ovarian cancer families. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 1341-1351. 10.1086/302099.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shaffer LG, Tommerup N: ISCN, An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. 2005, Basel, S. Karger AGGoogle Scholar
- Applied Spectral Imaging (ASI). [http://www.spectral-imaging.com/]
- Petitjean A, Mathe E, Kato S, Ishioka C, Tavtigian SV, Hainaut P, Olivier M: Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat. 2007, 28: 622-629. 10.1002/humu.20495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- IARC TP53 mutation database. [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/]
- Puiffe ML, Le Page C, Filali-Mouhim A, Zietarska M, Ouellet V, Tonin PN, Chevrette M, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM: Characterization of ovarian cancer ascites on cell invasion, proliferation, spheroid formation, and gene expression in an in vitro model of epithelial ovarian cancer. Neoplasia. 2007, 9: 820-829. 10.1593/neo.07472.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Prat J: Ovarian carcinomas, including secondary tumors: diagnostically challenging areas. Mod Pathol. 2005, 18 Suppl 2: S99-111. 10.1038/modpathol.3800312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boente MP, Hurteau J, Rodriguez GC, Bast RC, Berchuck A: The biology of ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 1993, 5: 900-907. 10.1097/00001622-199309000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berchuck A, Elbendary A, Havrilesky L, Rodriguez GC, Bast RC: Pathogenesis of ovarian cancers. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1994, 1: 181-190. 10.1159/000097159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aunoble B, Sanches R, Didier E, Bignon YJ: Major oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes involved in epithelial ovarian cancer (review). Int J Oncol. 2000, 16: 567-576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meden H, Kuhn W: Overexpression of the oncogene c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu) in ovarian cancer: a new prognostic factor. [Review] [36 refs]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol. 1997, 71: 173-179. 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02630-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meden H, Marx D, Schauer A, Wuttke W, Kuhn W: Prognostic significance of p105 (c-erbB-2 HER2/neu) serum levels in patients with ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 1997, 17: 757-760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987, 235: 177-182. 10.1126/science.3798106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calvo BF, Levine AM, Marcos M, Collins QF, Iacocca MV, Caskey LS, Gregory CW, Lin Y, Whang YE, Earp HS, Mohler JL: Human epidermal receptor-2 expression in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 1087-1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burleson KM, Boente MP, Pambuccian SE, Skubitz AP: Disaggregation and invasion of ovarian carcinoma ascites spheroids. J Transl Med. 2006, 4: 6-10.1186/1479-5876-4-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Freedman VH, Shin SI: Cellular tumorigenicity in nude mice: correlation with cell growth in semi-solid medium. Cell. 1974, 3: 355-359. 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90050-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cody NA, Ouellet V, Manderson EN, Quinn MC, Filali-Mouhim A, Tellis P, Zietarska M, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM, Chevrette M, Tonin PN: Transfer of chromosome 3 fragments suppresses tumorigenicity of an ovarian cancer cell line monoallelic for chromosome 3p. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 618-632. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taetle R, Aickin M, Yang JM, Panda L, Emerson J, Roe D, Adair L, Thompson F, Liu Y, Wisner L, Davis JR, Trent J, Alberts DS: Chromosome abnormalities in ovarian adenocarcinoma: I. Nonrandom chromosome abnormalities from 244 cases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999, 25: 290-300. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199907)25:3<290::AID-GCC12>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomlins SA, Laxman B, Dhanasekaran SM, Helgeson BE, Cao X, Morris DS, Menon A, Jing X, Cao Q, Han B, Yu J, Wang L, Montie JE, Rubin MA, Pienta KJ, Roulston D, Shah RB, Varambally S, Mehra R, Chinnaiyan AM: Distinct classes of chromosomal rearrangements create oncogenic ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nature. 2007, 448: 595-599. 10.1038/nature06024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R, Sun XW, Varambally S, Cao X, Tchinda J, Kuefer R, Lee C, Montie JE, Shah RB, Pienta KJ, Rubin MA, Chinnaiyan AM: Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science. 2005, 310: 644-648. 10.1126/science.1117679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin ES, Tonon G, Sinha R, Xiao Y, Feng B, Kimmelman AC, Protopopov A, Ivanova E, Brennan C, Montgomery K, Kucherlapati R, Bailey G, Redston M, Chin L, DePinho RA: Common and distinct genomic events in sporadic colorectal cancer and diverse cancer types. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 10736-10743. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weir BA, Woo MS, Getz G, Perner S, Ding L, Beroukhim R, Lin WM, Province MA, Kraja A, Johnson LA, Shah K, Sato M, Thomas RK, Barletta JA, Borecki IB, Broderick S, Chang AC, Chiang DY, Chirieac LR, Cho J, Fujii Y, Gazdar AF, Giordano T, Greulich H, Hanna M, Johnson BE, Kris MG, Lash A, Lin L, Lindeman N, Mardis ER, McPherson JD, Minna JD, Morgan MB, Nadel M, Orringer MB, Osborne JR, Ozenberger B, Ramos AH, Robinson J, Roth JA, Rusch V, Sasaki H, Shepherd F, Sougnez C, Spitz MR, Tsao MS, Twomey D, Verhaak RG, Weinstock GM, Wheeler DA, Winckler W, Yoshizawa A, Yu S, Zakowski MF, Zhang Q, Beer DG, Wistuba, Watson MA, Garraway LA, Ladanyi M, Travis WD, Pao W, Rubin MA, Gabriel SB, Gibbs RA, Varmus HE, Wilson RK, Lander ES, Meyerson M: Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2007Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/152/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.