- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Modulation of mdm2 pre-mRNA splicing by 9-aminoacridine-PNA (peptide nucleic acid) conjugates targeting intron-exon junctions
BMC Cancer volume 10, Article number: 342 (2010)
Modulation of pre-mRNA splicing by antisense molecules is a promising mechanism of action for gene therapeutic drugs. In this study, we have examined the potential of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) 9-aminoacridine conjugates to modulate the pre-mRNA splicing of the mdm2 human cancer gene in JAR cells.
We screened 10 different 15 mer PNAs targeting intron2 at both the 5' - and the 3'-splice site for their effects on the splicing of mdm2 using RT-PCR analysis. We also tested a PNA (2512) targeting the 3'-splice site of intron3 with a complementarity of 4 bases to intron3 and 11 bases to exon4 for its splicing modulation effect. This PNA2512 was further tested for the effects on the mdm2 protein level as well as for inhibition of cell growth in combination with the DNA damaging agent camptothecin (CPT).
We show that several of these PNAs effectively inhibit the splicing thereby producing a larger mRNA still containing intron2, while skipping of exon3 was not observed by any of these PNAs. The most effective PNA (PNA2406) targeting the 3'-splice site of intron2 had a complementarity of 4 bases to intron2 and 11 bases to exon3. PNA (2512) targeting the 3'-splice site of intron3 induced both splicing inhibition (intron3 skipping) and skipping of exon4. Furthermore, treatment of JAR cells with this PNA resulted in a reduction in the level of MDM2 protein and a concomitant increase in the level of tumor suppressor p53. In addition, a combination of this PNA with CPT inhibited cell growth more than CPT alone.
We have identified several PNAs targeting the 5'- or 3'-splice sites in intron2 or the 3'-splice site of intron3 of mdm2 pre-mRNA which can inhibit splicing. Antisense targeting of splice junctions of mdm2 pre-mRNA may be a powerful method to evaluate the cellular function of MDM2 splice variants as well as a promising approach for discovery of mdm2 targeted anticancer drugs.
Antisense molecules with significantly modified backbones such as peptide nucleic acids (PNA), methoxyethoxy (MOE) and locked nucleic acids (LNA), or morpholino oligos, rendering them RNase H inactive, are able to modulate mRNA splicing when targeting intron-exon junctions in pre-mRNA [1–7]. For instance correction of aberrant splicing by blocking cryptic 5'- or 3'- splice sites, induction of exon skipping [8–10] and force selection of an alternative splice site by targeting antisense molecules to original splice sites  have been demonstrated. Thus antisense targeting of splice junctions have the potential of inducing shifts in the ratio between biologically functional splice variants or even induce non-natural splice variants with novel biological function of the resulting protein. Therefore, splicing targeting technology may open a range of opportunities for gene targeting in drug discovery and molecular biology contexts [5, 12, 13].
The mdm2 oncogene is amplified and/or over expressed in several cancer types . This oncogene encodes a protein that negatively controls the functions of the p53 tumor suppressor protein by blocking the transactivation domain and by stimulating the degradation of p53. Down regulation of MDM2 has been recognized as a potential mechanism for cancer therapy [15, 16] because down-regulation of MDM2 in tumors exhibiting MDM2 over-expression should induce p53 stability and thus sensitization to DNA-damaging treatments via p53-dependent pathways [17–20]. Accordingly, recent studies have shown down regulation of full-length MDM2 protein through a traditional RnaseH dependent antisense approach. In addition, more than 40 different splice variants of mdm2 mRNA have been detected in tumors and normal cells [17, 21], but the potential functions or oncogenic properties of the different MDM2 isoforms are far from fully understood [22–24]. Therefore, targeting of mdm2 mRNA splicing could be an effective way of controlling and studying overall MDM2 expression and function.
It has recently been shown that PNA oligomers targeted to exon-intron splice junctions are potent inhibitors/modulators of mRNA splicing [6, 25]. By targeting a 3'- splice site, at least two outcomes have been found although no systematic studies have yet been published. The spliceosome will either skip the exon and thus produce a truncated mRNA missing the exon, or skip the intron excision and thereby produce a larger mRNA still containing the intron. Therefore, PNA molecules designed to down-regulate full length mdm2 mRNA or shift relative populations of splice variants by splicing modulation may be a useful approach for both future therapy as recently indicated for PNA targeting of CD40 pre-mRNA (7), as well as for investigating the functions of mdm2 splice variants . However, limited information is available concerning the optimum design of antisense PNA oligomers, including target location, for the desired splicing modulation [6, 7, 26]. Therefore we decided to perform a more systematic study of PNA oligomers targeting the 5'- or 3'-splice sites in the human MDM2 gene.
In this study, we have tested ten PNAs (15-mer) targeting intron2 (seven PNAs targeting the 3'-splice site and three PNAs are targeting to the 5'-splice site) as well as a PNAs targeting the 3'-splice site of intron3. Depending on the target site intron and/or exon skipping was observed, and most interestingly targeting of intron2 also affected the splicing of intron3. Finally, treatment of JAR cells with the PNA targeting intron3 resulted in a significant reduction in the level of MDM2 protein and a concomitant increase in the level of tumor suppressor p53
Synthesis of PNA
The sequences of the PNAs and nomenclatures are listed in Table 1. PNA synthesis was carried out as reported in elsewhere . PNAs were HPLC-purified and characterized by mass spectrometry. N-(9-aminoaciridinyl)-6-aminohexanoic acid (Acr) was covalently linked to the PNA at the N-terminal of the PNA  through an ethyleneglycol type linker (eg1, 8-amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid) (Acr-PNA). Purified PNAs were lyophilized and stored at 4°C until use.
JAR cells were provided by Dr. Peter Ebbesen (The Stem Cell Laboratory, Aalborg University, Denmark). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1.5% glutamax (Gibco) and streptomycin/penicillin (100 U/ml each)) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.
Exponentially growing cells were cultured in 6 well plates the day before transfection to give 40-60% confluency at the time of transfection. LipofectAMINE (LFA, Gibco) or LipofectAMINE2000 (LFA2000, Gibco) was used for the transfection of the PNAs with Acr modification. LFA was used unless otherwise stated. The PNA solution (200 μM in water) was heated for 2 minutes at 90°C then cooled to room temperature and used as stock solution. In a separate tube, LFA or LFA2000 was diluted with OPTI-MEM (Gibco) at a ratio of 120 μl/ml and 80 μl/ml, respectively. Then the diluted LFA or LFA2000 solution was mixed with an equal volume of the PNA solution and incubated for 5 min, and finally 200 μl Acr-PNA/LFA solution was mixed with 800 μl of OPTI-MEM or the RPMI medium (10% FBS, 1% glutamax) respectively for LFA and LFA2000. This PNA transfection solution was added to the cells after removing the growth medium using 0.5 ml or 0.1 ml/well for in 24 well plate or 96 well plate, respectively. After 3-6 h incubation, the cells were supplemented with 1 ml of growth medium (RPMI1640 containing 10% FBS and 1.5% glutamax) and incubated further up to 24 h. The PNA2967 and PNA2968 (PNAs with oligoarginine) were transfected without cationic lipids and 120 μM chloroquine (CQ) was added to the OPTI-MEM for the CQ treatment. Nomenclatures and sequences of PNAs are listed in table 1. The positions of the PNA target sites are illustrated in Figure 1.
24 h after transfection, total RNA was extracted from the cells by using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and subjected to RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). 4 ng of total RNA was used for each RT-PCR reaction (20 μl). Primers for RT-PCR detection of splice sites of mdm2 pre-mRNA and β-actin (as internal control) are listed in Table 2. The RT-PCR program was as follows: (55°C, 35 min) × 1 cycle, (95°C, 15 min) × 1 cycle, (94°C, 1 min; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C, 1 min) × 26-30 cycles. RT-PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels with 1 × TBE buffer and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Gel images were captured by ImageMaster (Pharmacia Biotech) and analyzed by UN-SCAN-IT software (Silk Scientific Corporation). It is important to note that the RT-PCR experiments cannot be used for absolute quantification from one set of experiments to the next due to variations in RNA extraction, RT-PCR amplification and gel analysis. Thus the results are reported relative to the internal control (β-actin).
Western blot analysis
Cells were transfected with PNA as described above and subjected to protein sample preparation: The cells were lysed in boiling lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 1X protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche, Germany)), and 40 μg of the protein was fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-10% PAGE) and transferred to a PVDF-membrane (ADVANTEC MFS). Blocking, detection and re-probing were performed with the ECL-Plus system (Amersham) following the manufacture's instruction. Briefly, the PVDF-membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk (in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) over night at 4°C and incubated with a primary antibody (anti-MDM2, SMP14 (Sigma); anti-p53, ab6 (Santa Cruz); anti-β-actin, AC-15, (Sigma)) overnight at 4°C. The membrane was washed with washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 20) three times for a minimum of 15 min each at room temperature, and then incubated with 1:20000 diluted anti-mouse IgG-horse radish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody (DAKO, P0161) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing as described above, the protein of interest was detected with ECL-Plus (Amersham).
JAR cells, plated in a 96 well plate the day before transfection, were subjected to PNA transfection in combination with camptothecin (CPT) treatment. CPT was added to the PNA transfection solution at the desired concentration and incubated for 48 h. Subsequently, cell viability was determined by the MTS-assay using the CellTiter 96 Aqueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance is presented as relative cellular viability (absorbance from non-PNA treated cells was set as 100%).
Results and Discussion
Ten PNAs targeting intron2 at the 5' or 3' splice sites were tested for their ability to inhibit splicing of mdm2 pre-mRNA. As the first in frame AUG translation start codon is located in exon3, we focused on splice interference that might result in exon3 skipping, thereby prohibiting any translation initiation from the mRNA. In order to facilitate cellular uptake, we used 9-aminoacridine conjugated PNAs in combination with cationic lipid transfection reagent as previously described .
Three PNAs (PNA 2545, 2547 and 2549), targeting the 5'-splice site of intron2 (Figure 1(a)), were tested at 2 μM. Splicing inhibitory effects were analyzed by RT-PCR amplifying a region covering the 3'-splice site of intron2 using primer set C (primer sets are listed in Table 2) to detect mRNA still including intron2. The 3'-splice site was used instead of the 5'-splice site to avoid RT-PCR inhibition by PNA targeting the 5'-splice site. PNA2549 (complementary to 11 bases of exon2 and 4 bases of intron2) showed the highest splicing inhibition among the three nested PNAs, and PNA 2547 did not show any significant splicing inhibition (Figure 2). Exon skipping was not detected for any of these PNAs (at 2 μM concentration).
The effects of seven PNAs targeting the 3'-splice site of intron2 (Figure 1(b)), were compared by RT-PCR amplification of a region including the 5'-splice site of intron2 (Figure 3). The PNAs were tested at 2 μM concentration and of the seven PNAs, one PNA (2406) was clearly more active, four PNAs (2551, 2553, 2557 and 2559) did inhibit splicing to a significant degree, while two PNAs (2555 and 2561) showed no activity (same as no PNA control). A direct comparison between PNAs 2406, 2549, 2551 and 2553 clearly showed the highest activity for PNA 2406 (Figure 4), and we therefore decided to focus further studies on this PNA. The limited data also indicate that the most active PNAs for a given splice junction (PNA 2549 and 2406) should be positioned over the junction with a bias (75%) to the exon side.
Inhibition of intron2-exon3 cleavage by PNA2406 exhibited a clear dose response (Figure 5A), and a control PNA (2681) having two mismatches in the sequence (by nucleobase interchange) in contrast to PNA 2406 showed no activity at 2 μM (Figure 5B). Next we asked whether blocking of the intron2-exon3 junction by PNA 2406 had any other effects on splicing such as skipping of exon3 or inhibition of the splicing of adjacent introns. These experiments were performed by RT-PCR using the primers indicated in Figure 6A. The results (Figure 6C) very clearly show no indication of significant skipping of exon3 (112 bp). Because this sequence does not include the PNA target, the RT-PCR reaction is not inhibited by the PNA. In contrast the splicing inhibited product (318 bp) does contain the PNA target, and this is decreased in the PNA treated sample. Also the effect of the PNA is note solely localized to the targeted intron but does affect splicing of adjacent introns. For example the amount of unspliced intron 3 is increased 2-4-fold (Fig 6(B) (b) and 6(c)), while no significant change of intron 4 splicing was detected (Figure 6 (B), (d) and 6(e)).
To validate the target design of PNA for efficient splicing inhibition, we designed another PNA (PNA2512) targeting the 3'-splice site in intron3 with a complementary of 4 bases in intron3 and 11 bases in exon4 (Figure 1C). The effect of PNA2512 on splicing at intron2, 3 and 4 was analyzed by detecting the regions including the 5' or 3' splice sites of intron2, 3, and 4 (Figure 7A, region (a) - (e)). Only inhibition of splicing out of intron3 was observed in this case. Furthermore, in contrast to PNA2406, PNA2512 induced skipping of exon4 in addition to intron skipping (Figure 7B-(c), Figure 7C). PNA2512 showed a dose-dependent increase of the skipped form and decrease of the normal form (ca 1/3 conversion at 4 μM), while there was no such effect with the mismatch PNA. This PNA oligomer was further studied by using a different cellular delivery method not requiring cationic lipid assistance, but based on cell penetrating peptides (CPP). In this case the PNA was conjugated to octaarginine (PNA2967) or to decanoyl-octaarginine, having decanoic acid (as a lipidic domain) attached to the ε-amine of Lys side chain (Cat-Lip-PNA , PNA2968). These PNAs were transfected to the cells both in the absence or the presence of the endosomolytic reagent chloroquine (CQ) since CQ is known to improve the cellular activity of CPP conjugates (Figure 8) . The PNAs showed exon skipping activity in a dose dependent manner and the effect was significantly improvement upon CQ addition. As expected (28) the Cat-Lip PNA2968 exhibited the higher activity reaching more than 50% conversion at 6 μM in the presence of CQ, Although the activity of this PNA in the absence of CQ - somewhat surprisingly - is lower than that exhibited by lipofectamine mediated delivery of PNA2512, it is still higher than that observed for the analogous arginine PNA2967. Furthermore, CPP-PNA mediate splicing modulation is of considerable interest, since CPP delivery in contrast to lipofectamine mediated delivery holds some promise for in vivo and eventually therapeutic use [30, 31].
Because PNA 2512 produced a combination of intron and exon skipped mRNA forms both of which would prohibit correct protein translation, we decided to analyze the effect of treatment with this PNA on the protein expression level of mdm2 as well as of p53, which is directly regulated by mdm2. After PNA treatment, cellular proteins were subjected to western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 9, PNA2512 induced a significant, dose dependent decrease of MDM2 (90 kDa) protein levels at 2 μM and 4 μM (while mismatch PNA (PNA2733, with two base pairs internal exchange) clearly induced less decrease of the MDM2 than full matched PNA at the same concentrations). No evidence for accumulation of any truncated MDM2 protein from the truncated mRNA missing exon4 (mw 52374) or from the splicing-inhibited mRNA containing intron3 which contains a termination codon (calc mw 3823) was seen at the tested PNA concentrations. Furthermore, PNA2512 induced a several fold increase of p53 protein level which was not observed with the control PNA2733. This effect is ascribed to the reduction in MDM2 protein level via the "negative feedback regulation" mechanism . Whether simply inhibiting MDM2 synthesis is most effectively achieved via targeting of splicing as described in the present report or through direct translational inhibition as previously found  remains to be established by further optimization and direct comparison although the data so far indicate comparable potency.
Finally, we tested the effect of PNA2512 on cell proliferation in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitor anticancer agent camptothecin (CPT). It could be anticipated that DNA-damaging agents that activate the p53 response could act synergistically with antisense agents that activates p53 by reducing MDM2 levels, as has previously been indicated employing phosphorothioates  and PNA . Thus the effect of PNA2512 on cell proliferation was evaluated in combination with the DNA-damaging anticancer agent CPT (Figure 10). Cells treated with CPT in combination with PNA2512 at 6 μM showed significantly lower cell viability as compared to CPT treatment alone or to CPT-treatment in combination with a mismatch PNA. We also tested lower concentrations of PNA2512 (2 and 4 μM) in combination with CPT but found no significant effect (data not shown). The results do not allow us to conclude if the effect is truly synergistic, but they do indicate that it is more than additive. However, further experiments are required for more detailed characterization of cell death induction by PNA in combination with CPT.
In summary, we have identified several PNAs targeting the 5' or 3' splice sites in intron2 of mdm2 pre-mRNA which can inhibit splicing. One of the most efficient PNAs (PNA2406) is targeting the 3' splice site and is complementary to 4 bases in intron2 and 11 bases in exon3. Interestingly, PNA2512, which is targeting the 3' splice site of intron3 and is complementary to 4 bases in intron3 and 11 bases in exon4, showed both splicing inhibition as well as exon skipping. Furthermore, PNA2406 inhibited splicing of both intron2 as well as the downstream intron (intron3), whereas PNA2512 only inhibited the splicing of intron3 (and not downstream intron4). These results reflect the complexity of the splicing mechanism and thus the splicing modulation by antisense PNAs (and presumably other antisense agents as well). Further studies are required to obtain more generally applicable guidelines for designing antisense PNAs for a desired splicing modulation. Treatment of JAR cells in culture with the most potent PNA (2512) for pre-mRNA splicing modulation also affected protein expression, causing a reduction of the level of MDM2 protein and (consequently) an increase in the level of p53. Finally, this PNA increased the cytotoxicity of the anticancer camptothecin presumably caused by the PNA mediated up-regulation of p53. In conclusion these results add to the accumulating evidence that antisense mediated mRNA splice modulation have interesting prospects both within drug discovery but also as a molecular biology tool. Once more potent in vivo PNA delivery methods are available, the present results provide the basis for further drug discovery studies.
Kole R, Vacek M, Williams T: Modification of alternative splicing by antisense therapeutics. Oligonucleotides. 2004, 14: 65-74. 10.1089/154545704322988067.
Lu QL, Rabinowitz A, Chen YC, Yokota T, Yin H, Alter J, Jadoon A, Bou-Gharios G, Partridge T: Systemic delivery of antisense oligoribonucleotide restores dystrophin expression in body-wide skeletal muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 198-203. 10.1073/pnas.0406700102.
Suwanmanee T, Sierakowska H, Lacerra G, Svasti S, Kirby S, Walsh CE, Fucharoen S, Kole R: Restoration of human beta-globin gene expression in murine and human IVS2-654 thalassemic erythroid cells by free uptake of antisense oligonucleotides. Mol Pharmacol. 2002, 62: 545-553. 10.1124/mol.62.3.545.
Giles RV, Spiller DG, Clark RE, Tidd DM: Antisense morpholino oligonucleotide analog induces missplicing of C-myc mRNA. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999, 9: 213-220.
Gebski BL, Mann CJ, Fletcher S, Wilton SD: Morpholino antisense oligonucleotide induced dystrophin exon 23 skipping in mdx mouse muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12: 1801-1811. 10.1093/hmg/ddg196.
Karras JG, Maier MA, Lu T, Watt A, Manoharan M: Peptide nucleic acids are potent modulators of endogenous pre-mRNA splicing of the murine interleukin-5 receptor-alpha chain. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 7853-7859. 10.1021/bi010263l.
Siwkowski AM, Malik L, Esau CC, Maier MA, Wancewicz EV, Albertshofer K, Monia BP, Bennett CF, Eldrup AB: Identification and functional validation of PNAs that inhibit murine CD40 expression by redirection of splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 2695-2706. 10.1093/nar/gkh584.
van Deutekom JC, Bremmer-Bout M, Janson AA, Ginjaar IB, Baas F, den Dunnen JT, van Ommen GJ: Antisense-induced exon skipping restores dystrophin expression in DMD patient derived muscle cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 1547-1554. 10.1093/hmg/10.15.1547.
Pramono ZA, Takeshima Y, Alimsardjono H, Ishii A, Takeda S, Matsuo M: Induction of exon skipping of the dystrophin transcript in lymphoblastoid cells by transfecting an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to an exon recognition sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 226: 445-449. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1375.
Mann CJ, Honeyman K, Cheng AJ, Ly T, Lloyd F, Fletcher S, Morgan JE, Partridge TA, Wilton SD: Antisense-induced exon skipping and synthesis of dystrophin in the mdx mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 42-47. 10.1073/pnas.011408598.
Taylor JK, Zhang QQ, Wyatt JR, Dean NM: Induction of endogenous Bcl-xS through the control of Bcl-x pre-mRNA splicing by antisense oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol. 1999, 17: 1097-1100. 10.1038/15079.
Mercatante DR, Kole R: Control of alternative splicing by antisense oligonucleotides as a potential chemotherapy: effects on gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1587: 126-132.
Mercatante D, Kole R: Modification of alternative splicing pathways as a potential approach to chemotherapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2000, 85: 237-243. 10.1016/S0163-7258(99)00067-4.
Momand J, Jung D, Wilczynski S, Niland J: The MDM2 gene amplification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 3453-3459. 10.1093/nar/26.15.3453.
Wang H, Nan L, Yu D, Agrawal S, Zhang R: Antisense anti-MDM2 oligonucleotides as a novel therapeutic approach to human breast cancer: in vitro and in vivo activities and mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 3613-3624.
Tortora G, Caputo R, Damiano V, Bianco R, Chen J, Agrawal S, Bianco AR, Ciardiello F: A novel MDM2 anti-sense oligonucleotide has anti-tumor activity and potentiates cytotoxic drugs acting by different mechanisms in human colon cancer. Int J Cancer. 2000, 88: 804-809. 10.1002/1097-0215(20001201)88:5<804::AID-IJC19>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Bartel F, Harris LC, Wurl P, Taubert H: MDM2 and its splice variant messenger RNAs: expression in tumors and down-regulation using antisense oligonucleotides. Mol Cancer Res. 2004, 2: 29-35.
Chen L, Lu W, Agrawal S, Zhou W, Zhang R, Chen J: Ubiquitous induction of p53 in tumor cells by antisense inhibition of MDM2 expression. Mol Med. 1999, 5: 21-34.
Chen L, Agrawal S, Zhou W, Zhang R, Chen J: Synergistic activation of p53 by inhibition of MDM2 expression and DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 195-200. 10.1073/pnas.95.1.195.
Shiraishi T, Nielsen PE: Down-regulation of MDM2 and activation of p53 in human cancer cells by antisense 9-aminoacridine-PNA (peptide nucleic acid) conjugates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 4893-4902. 10.1093/nar/gkh820.
Bartel F, Taubert H, Harris LC: Alternative and aberrant splicing of MDM2 mRNA in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002, 2: 9-15. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00091-0.
Perry ME, Mendrysa SM, Saucedo LJ, Tannous P, Holubar M: p76(MDM2) inhibits the ability of p90(MDM2) to destabilize p53. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 5733-5738. 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5733.
Bartel F, Meye A, Wurl P, Kappler M, Bache M, Lautenschlager C, Grunbaum U, Schmidt H, Taubert H: Amplification of the MDM2 gene, but not expression of splice variants of MDM2 MRNA, is associated with prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Cancer. 2001, 95: 168-175. 10.1002/1097-0215(20010520)95:3<168::AID-IJC1029>3.0.CO;2-A.
Fridman JS, Hernando E, Hemann MT, de Stanchina E, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW: Tumor promotion by Mdm2 splice variants unable to bind p53. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 5703-5706.
Sazani P, Kang SH, Maier MA, Wei C, Dillman J, Summerton J, Manoharan M, Kole R: Nuclear antisense effects of neutral, anionic and cationic oligonucleotide analogs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 3965-3974.
Sazani P, Gemignani F, Kang SH, Maier MA, Manoharan M, Persmark M, Bortner D, Kole R: Systemically delivered antisense oligomers upregulate gene expression in mouse tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2002, 20: 1228-1233. 10.1038/nbt759.
Christensen L, Fitzpatrick R, Gildea B, Petersen KH, Hansen HF, Koch T, Egholm M, Buchardt O, Nielsen PE, Coull J, et al: Solid-phase synthesis of peptide nucleic acids. J Pept Sci. 1995, 1: 175-183. 10.1002/psc.310010304.
Koppelhus U, Shiraishi T, Zachar V, Pankratova S, Nielsen PE: Improved cellular activity of antisense peptide nucleic acids by conjugation to a cationic peptide-lipid (CatLip) domain. Bioconjug Chem. 2008, 19: 1526-1534. 10.1021/bc800068h.
Shiraishi T, Nielsen PE: Enhanced delivery of cell-penetrating peptide-peptide nucleic acid conjugates by endosomal disruption. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 633-636. 10.1038/nprot.2006.92.
Mae M, Langel U: Cell-penetrating peptides as vectors for peptide, protein and oligonucleotide delivery. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006, 6: 509-514. 10.1016/j.coph.2006.04.004.
Ivanova GD, Arzumanov A, Abes R, Yin H, Wood MJ, Lebleu B, Gait MJ: Improved cell-penetrating peptide-PNA conjugates for splicing redirection in HeLa cells and exon skipping in mdx mouse muscle. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 6418-6428. 10.1093/nar/gkn671.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/342/prepub
This study was supported by the Danish Cancer Society, The Lundbeck Foundation (Senior research fellowship to TS) and the Danish Medical Research Council.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
TS and PEN designed the project; JE and TS performed the experiments; TS and PEN wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.