Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations between hepatitis B virus infection and risk of colorectal Cancer: a population-based prospective study

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 1119 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have observed a close association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as extrahepatic cancers. However, research concerning the effect of HBV infection on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and inconsistent. This study aims to determine the relationship between HBV infection and new-onset CRC.

Methods

We prospectively examined the relationship between HBV infection and new-onset CRC among 93,390 participants from Kailuan Cohort study. Cox proportional hazards regression models, subgroup analyses and competing risk analyses were used to evaluate the association between HBV infection and the risk of new-onset CRC.

Results

During a median follow-up of 11.28 years, 448 incident CRC cases were identified. The adjusted HR (95%confidence interval (CI)) for the association of HBsAg Seropositive with CRC was 1.85(1.15 ~ 2.96) in the Cox regression. Subgroup analyses showed that the HBsAg seropositive group was associated with increased risk of new-onset CRC among male, middle-aged, normal weight, smokers and non-drinker participants, respectively. A positive association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC was observed in the adjusted sub-distribution proportional hazards (SD) models (HRSD = 1.77, 95% CI:1.11–2.84) and cause-specific hazards (CS) models (HRCS = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.13–2.91).

Conclusions

Our results have found a significant association between HBV infection and the risk of incident CRC among Chinese participants.

Trial registration

Kailuan study, ChiCTR–TNRC–11001489. Registered 24 August 2011 - Retrospectively registered, http:// http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=8050

Peer Review reports

Background

The burden of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a public health threat in many parts of the world. WHO estimates that the global prevalence of HBV infection is 3.5%, with approximately 257 million people currently infected [1]. The majority of HBV-infected people were born before the availability of the hepatitis B vaccine [2]. HBV creates a plasmid-like covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) form in the nucleus of infected cells, which leads to chronicity of the HBV infection [3]. HBV infection is estimated to be responsible for 56% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [4], which is the main histological type of primary liver cancer. More than half of the global incidence and mortality of HCC is in China [1]. Besides HCC, untreated patients with HBV infection are also at an elevated risk for liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis [5, 6].

A few epidemiological studies have observed a positive relationship between HBV infection and the development of extrahepatic cancers such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, and gallbladder cancer [7,8,9,10]. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth and third most common cancer in men and women respectively [11]. It comprises of almost 10% of global cancer incidence [12]. Well-characterized CRC risk factors include obesity, dietary composition, family history and lack of physical activity [13,14,15]. Only a few existing studies have demonstrated the positive association of chronic HBV infection and the occurrence of CRC; most studies failed to prove such a link [10, 16]. This discrepancy may be due to different ethnicities or predisposing conditions. Previous studies concerning the association between HBV infection and CRC were conducted in countries with a relatively low prevalence of HBV infection, making it difficult to draw a statistically significant conclusion. Other insufficiencies also included minimal control of confounders, overestimation of CRC incidence among hospitalized participants, lack of assessment of the competing risk events (death) in survival models, and analyses that were rarely stratified by sex or age. The preventive strategies based on prognostic models that estimate the actual individual risk of CRC need to be as accurate as possible, allowing for more appropriate preventive measures and treatments to be implemented quickly and intensively.

Due to the inconsistent results and inadequate evidence, we aimed to clarify the relationship between HBV infection and new-onset CRC by drawing data from Kailuan Study.

Methods

Study population

Data were derived from the Kailuan study (Trial identification: ChiCTR–TNRC–11001489; Registration number: 11001489), which is a large, prospective, longitudinal and population-based cohort study. Details regarding the design and methods of the study have been previously described [17, 18]. All corporations’ employees, including retirees, between the ages 18 to 98 years were invited to take part in the baseline physical examinations which took place at Kailuan General Hospital and it’s 10 affiliated hospitals between July 2006 and October 2007. Written consent was obtained from 101,510 participants (65.3%) who agreed to take part. All participants were followed up biennially for collection of information regarding potential risk factors and newly diagnosed CRC cases.

In the present study, we excluded 469 subjects with a history of cancer at baseline examination, 3319 subjects who had missing data or unclear results for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and 4332 subjects without data of other potential variables including age, sex, body mass index (BMI, in kg/m2), waist circumference (WC, in cm), systolic blood pressure (SBP, in mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP, in mmHg), total cholesterol (TC, in mmol/L), triglyceride, (TG, in mmol/L), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP, in mg/L), alanine aminotransferase (ALT, in u/L), total bilirubin (TBil in umol/L), diabetes mellitus, family income, educational background, marital status, salt consumption, current smoker, drinking status, physical activity and family history of cancer. A total of 93,390 subjects were finally enrolled in the study, including 74,644 (79.93%) men and 18,746 (20.07%) women. The details of the participants’ screening were shown in Fig. 1. In this current study, participants who were excluded were younger (49.85 ± 14.13 years versus 51.51 ± 12.44 years, P < 0.001), and had lower levels of BMI (24.71 ± 3.45 Kg/m2 versus 25.07 ± 3.49 Kg/m2, P < 0.001), and exhibited lower prevalence of HBV infection (179(2.20%) versus 2598(2.78%), P = 0.0105). This study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Kailuan General Hospital and Beijing Shijitan Hospital. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The procedure of participants screening

Full size image

Epidemiological survey and anthropometric parameters

Details of the collection of epidemiological surveys and anthropometric parameters were in accordance with previously published articles [19, 20]. Information on age, sex, lifestyle behaviors, educational background, socioeconomic status, and medical history was recorded via a standard questionnaire which was carried out by the medical staff and trained nurse. BMI was calculated as body weight (kilograms) divided by the square of body height (meters) and categorized into three groups [21]: normal (BMI<24 Kg/m2), overweight (24 ≤ BMI<28 Kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 28 Kg/m2). Current alcohol consumer was defined as having drunk ≥100 ml/day of alcohol lasting for more than 6 months. Smoking was defined as having 1 cigarette/day at least for more than 6 months. Physical exercise was evaluated from responses regarding the frequency of physical activity (≥3 times/week, ≥30 min/time). Dietary salt intake was self-reported and classified into three categories: low (< 6 g/day), medium (6-9 g/day) or high (≥10 g/day), and high salt diet was defined as consuming salt≥10 g per day on average. Hypertension was defined as: previously diagnosed, and/or a SBP ≥140 mmHg, and/or a DPB ≥90 mmHg, and/or the use of antihypertensive medication [22].

HBV infection and laboratory assessment

Blood samples were collected using vacuum tubes containing EDTA after an overnight fast (≥ 8 h) from each participant at the baseline. The blood was further centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rotations per minute at 25 °C. Plasma was separated and stored at − 80 °C until laboratory determinations were performed. An auto-analyzer (Hitachi 747; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze all the plasma samples at the Kailuan General Hospital central laboratory. HBsAg was detected quantitatively by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SHANGHAI KEHUA BIO-ENGINEERING, KHB, Shanghai, China) with standard operating procedure. TC and TG were both measured using enzymatic colorimetric method (Mind Bioengineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). Hs-CRP was measured using a high-sensitivity nephelometry assay (Cias Latex CRP-H, Kanto Chemical Co. Inc). ALT was measured using an enzymatic rate method (Mind Bioengineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). Serum TBil was measured using a chemical oxidation method (MedicalSystem Biotechnology, China). Diabetes mellitus was defined as follows [23]: a fasting blood glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, taking oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin, or a validated physician diagnosis. According to the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Adult Dyslipidemia in China [24], hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were defined as TC ≥ 6.2 mmol/L and TG ≥ 2.3 mmol/L, respectively. Hyperbilirubinemia was defined as serum TBil> 21 umol/L.

Outcome assessment

The follow-up of each participant began at the end of baseline examination and terminated at the occurrence of any event as follows came first: CRC, death, or end of the follow-up (December 31, 2019). Incident CRC and CRC-unrelated death cases were obtained through routine biennial health examinations. Further CRC and CRC-unrelated death cases were assessed annually by checking discharge summaries from Kailuan General Hospital and its 10 affiliated hospitals where participants received treatments. Furthermore, medical records linked with the Tangshan medical insurance system and death certificates from the Kailuan social security system were checked to further confirm the outcomes. CRC cases were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD–10), and CRC was coded as C18-C20.

Statistical analysis

Person-years of follow-up were calculated from the date of recruitment to the date of incidence, death, or termination of follow-up. Mean (standard deviation, SD) and t-test were used to describe and compare continuous variables. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis Test and median (interquartile range) were used to describe and test the differences of skewed distribution variables including serum hs-CRP, ALT, TG and TBil between groups. Proportions and Chi-square tests were used to describe and compare categorical variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the association between HBV infection and the risk of new-onset CRC. Model 1 was a univariate analysis. Model 2 was adjusted for age (every 10 years) and sex. Model 3 was further adjusted for BMI (normal, overweight, obesity), hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hs-CRP (< 1 mg/L, 1–3 mg/L, > 3 mg/L), hyperbilirubinemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, diabetes, family income, educational background, marital status, salt consumption, current smoker, drinking status, physical activity and family history of cancer based on model 2.

Subgroup analyses were performed by sex (women vs. men), age (young group vs. middle-aged group vs. elder group), BMI (normal weight vs. overweight vs. obesity), smoking status (non-smoker vs. smoker) and drinking status (non-drinker vs. drinker). The interactions between HBV infection status and these variables were further tested by multiplicative models.

During follow-up, CRC unrelated death may occur prior to the occurrence of CRC cases. Due to the existence of competing risk events (CRC unrelated death), the observation of new-onset CRC and further interventions can be hindered. Conventional methods for survival analysis such as standard Cox proportional hazards regression may neglect the competing events and overestimate the absolute risk of the disease [25, 26]. Thus, competing risk analysis should be applied to epidemiologic research. In the current study, cause-specific hazards models (CS models) and sub-distribution proportional hazards models (SD models) were used to calculate HRCS and HRSD of CRC with the existence of competing risk by fitting into the standard Cox proportional hazards regressions.

In the sensitivity analysis, we further excluded 39 participants who had CRC within the first year after entry to the cohort to investigate the possibility of reverse causation.

Statistical computations were performed using a commercially available software program (SAS software, version 9.4). Reported P-values are two-sided, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The mean ± SD age of the 93,390 participants was 51.52 ± 12.43 years with 74,644 (79.93%) men and 18,746 (20.07%) women. The overall prevalence of HBsAg seropositive was 2.8%. Individuals who were HBsAg seropositive were younger, had lower SBP levels, TC, hs-CRP and TG concentrations. HBsAg seropositive group was also associated with elevated ALT and TBil concentrations. Lower prevalence of hypertension, physical exercise, income, high-school graduation, and higher consumption of tobacco products were also observed in the HBsAg seropositive group. There was no difference in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, current drinking, family history of cancer, marital status, high salt diets and the levels of BMI, WC and DBP between groups. The baseline characteristics for participants stratified by HBV infection status are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the participants
Full size table

Association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC

During a median follow-up of 11.28 years, 448 incident CRC were identified over a total of 1,071,123 person-years among 93,390 participants. In the univariate analysis, compared with HBsAg Seronegative participants, no significant relationship between HBV infection and risk of CRC was observed (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.95–2.44). After adjustments were made for the potential confounders, participants with HBsAg seropositive had a significantly increased risk of developing incident CRC (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.15–2.96), (Table 2). Table 3 demonstrated the effects of HBV infection on the risk of CRC after stratifying the participants by sex, age, BMI, smoking status and drinking status. Subgroup analyses showed that the HBsAg Seropositive group was associated with a 75% (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.04–2.94), 95% (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.14–3.34), 172% (HR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.43–5.16), 220% (HR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.73–5.95) and 126% (HR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.38–3.68) increased risk of new-onset CRC among male, middle-aged, normal weight, smoker and non-drinker participants, respectively. However, those associations were not observed in participants who were female (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 0.71–7.50), younger (HR = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.64–11.85), elderly (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.21–3.51), overweight (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.63–3.22), obese (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.23–3.82), non-smokers (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.50–2.22) and alcohol consumers (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06–2.81). Present results suggest that the interaction of smoking status and HBV infection on the risk of CRC is significant (P for interaction = 0.0247). However, no evidence of interaction effect of HBV infection with sex, age, BMI and drinking status was observed.

Table 2 The association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC among different regressions
Full size table
Table 3 Stratified analysis of the association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC
Full size table

Association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC in the competing risk analysis

9882 CRC unrelated-death cases were identified during almost 11 years follow-up among 93,390 participants. After adjusting for the potential confounders, including age (every 10 years), sex, BMI (normal, overweight, obesity), hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hs-CRP (< 1 mg/L, 1–3 mg/L, > 3 mg/L), hyperbilirubinemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, diabetes, family income, educational background, marital status, salt consumption, current smoker, drinking status, physical activity and family history of cancer, a statistically significant association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC was observed in the adjusted SD models (HRSD = 1.77, 95% CI:1.11–2.84). Similar results were also found in the adjusted CS models (HRCS = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.13–2.91) (Table 2).

Sensitivity analysis

After excluding 39 CRC cases that occurred during the first year of follow-up, participants with HBV infection were associated with a 68% (HR = 1.68, 95% CI:1.05–2.69) increase in the risk of CRC in the univariate analysis. The association remained statistically significant when the analysis was further adjusting for the potential confounders (HR = 2.05, 95% CI:1.28–3.30; Table 4).

Table 4 The association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC (exclude participants who occurred HCC within 1 year)
Full size table

Discussion

In this large-scale prospective cohort study, we observed a significant association between HBV infection and the risk of incident CRC among Chinese participants. The results were robust and stable even in the competing risk analyses which took CRC unrelated-death as the competing event. Subgroup analyses have shown that the association might be modified by categories of sex, age, BMI, smoking status and drinking status. Sensitivity analyses further confirmed the consistency of our findings. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between HBV infection and the risk of new-onset CRC among Chinese participants by using competing risk analyses.

The association between HBV infection and the risk of CRC has not been fully documented previously, despite this, our findings are in line with several population-based studies. Results from a population-based study in Taiwan showed that participants with HBV infection could expect a 36% increase in the risk of CRC compared with HBsAg seronegative participants in an analysis adjusted for sex, age, region, occupation, level of urbanization, income and the presence of comorbidities [27]. By analyzing the data of 496,732 participants in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) prospective cohort [28], Ci Song et.al found that HBV infection was positively associated with an elevated risk of CRC (HR = 1.36, 95% CI:1.09–1.70). However, a retrospective chart review failed to find the association between chronic HBV infection and colorectal adenoma [29]. This discrepancy may be due to a retrospective design, and a small sample size.

The association of HBV infection with the risk of CRC can be modified across categories of sex, age, BMI, smoking status and drinking status. Significant associations were not observed in participants who were females, younger, elderly, overweight, obese, non-smokers or alcohol consumers. Several explanations may help to clarify these discrepancies. First, despite the fact that abnormally elevated estrogen concentrations are associated with the increased risk of endometrial carcinoma and breast cancer [30], a meta-analysis observed a consistent protective effect of estrogens against colorectal cancer risk in both case-control studies and cohort studies [31]. The protection of estrogen in the development of CRC may explain the discrepancy between sex groups. Second, CRC is rare among neonates and young people and the cause-effect relationship may yield null results during short-term exposure to HBV infection among these participants. In elderly participants (mean age: 71.53 ± 5.18), long-term exposure to chronic HBV infection could lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In this current study, 14 (0.11%) cirrhosis cases were identified among elder participants versus 77 (0.09%) cases in the relatively younger participants (age ≤ 65 years). These long-term complications as well as cardiovascular events and stroke are life-threatening, and thus might hinder the occurrence of CRC. Third, although World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have proved that overweight and obesity increase the incidence of several cancers [32], unexpected inverse relationship between obesity and cancer mortality, the obesity paradox, has also been seen in other cancer types [33]. Previous studies have demonstrated that obesity CRC patients are related to a better prognosis in the metastatic setting [34]. Forth, non-smoker participants have also been associated with healthier life behaviors and lifestyles, factors which might have reversed the impact of the incidence of CRC. Alcohol consumption has been proved to be closely related to colorectal cancer [35]. However, we have no explanation for the negative association between HBV infection and CRC among drinking participants. Further study should be conducted to explore whether alcohol can eliminate the effect of HBV infection on the risk of CRC.

The association of HBsAg Seropositive with the occurrence of CRC is further confirmed by taking CRC unrelated-death as a competing event into the analyses. In the presence of CRC unrelated-death, competing risk will occur when participants experience a different outcome that competes with CRC cases. Epidemiologic research is fraught with competing risks. Conventional approaches for survival analysis which neglect the nature of competing events, such as the Kaplan-Meier method and standard Cox proportional hazard regression, may be inadequate. Alternative methods explicitly intended for evaluating competing risks data should be used. In the presence of competing risks, understanding the type of research that requires answering is crucial when selecting a method for survival analysis. Epidemiological studies generally address two main types of research questions. Risk factors or determinants and a given outcome are studied for aetiological research. The probability of a specific outcome at a specific time for an individual patient is studied for prognostic research. CS and SD models have been proven to be distinct by prior studies; research on disease etiology would be more suited for CS models, while prognostic research predicting an individual’s risk for an outcome or resource allocation would be more suited for SD models [36].

The mechanisms of HBV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma have been well elucidated [37]. However, no existing study has investigated the pathophysiological mechanism of the association between HBV infection and the risk of incident CRC. Due to the persistence of chronic HBV infection, the adaptive immunity changes from immune tolerance to progressive immune activation, inactivation, reactivation and exhaustion, which may pave the way to the development of HBV-associated CRC [38]. In addition, previous studies have detected the existence of HBV in several types of non-liver tissues including pancreas, kidney, skin and gastric mucosa [39, 40]. The integration of HBV DNA into its host genome takes place during the early stages of clonal tumor expansion, which causes genomic instability as well as direct insertional mutagenesis of various cancer-related genes. Research has shown that cancer patients have higher HBX and anti-HBc protein expression when compared to non-cancer patients [37]. Conscripted on cellular chromatin, HBX controls chromatin dynamics at precise gene loci. HBV-related tumors are associated with higher levels of chromosomal abnormalities, p53 inactivation due to mutations, and fetal hepatic progenitor cell gene overexpression than tumors connected to other risk factors [41]. Besides driving liver chronic necro-inflammation and stimulating the host immune response, there is a possibility that HBV is concealed in non-liver cells, and could initiate common and etiology-specific oncogenic pathways [42].

In this large-scale community-based study, one of the most significant strengths is the prospective design, which is less prone to recall bias than retrospective studies and more suited to examine the temporal association between potential risk factors and disease. The large sample size, long follow-up period along with a good number of incident CRC cases increase the accuracy and creditability of the results. In addition, the strengths of our study include an almost 100% follow-up rate via medical records, death certificates and health insurance among target participants, and the broad assessment of potential confounders which has been well addressed in this study. Lastly, although Cox regression was applied to estimate the relative risks of CRC as previous studies [27, 28], the implementation of competing risk regression makes our results more robust in the presence of competing risk.

Several limitations should also be noted when interpreting the results. First, the Kailuan study does not contain detailed information about the consumption of cereal, vegetables and high-fiber food, which hinders us from assessing confounding factors more precisely. Second, there is an imbalance in sex distribution caused by the industrial nature of the Kailuan Community. Nonetheless, since we conducted independent statistical research on both sexes, the impact of imbalance in sex distribution on the results would be minimal. Third, the industrial nature of Kailuan community homes mainly labor workers. Thus, extrapolated results might not be an accurate description of the wider Chinese population. Fourth, although we found an increased risk of CRC in chronic carriers of HBV, future studies should be conducted to detect the existence of HBV in colon tumors by using molecular biology, immunohistochemical methods to better elucidate the pathophysiological explanation of our findings.

Conclusions

Our results have provided evidence that chronic HBV infection plays an important role in the occurrence of CRC. The main clinical implications would be an increased awareness of early screening for CRC in individuals infected with HBV. We also encourage using competing risk models as a standard tool for developing predictive models in epidemiology studies.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and/or analyzed in this study are not publicly available. However, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

cccDNA:

Covalently closed circular DNA

HBsAg:

Hepatitis B surface antigen

BMI:

Body mass index

WC:

Waist circumference

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

hs-CRP:

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

TBil:

Total bilirubin

HRs:

Hazard ratios

CIs:

Confidence intervals

CS model:

Cause-specific hazards model

SD model:

Sub-distribution proportional hazards model

References

  1. 1.

    Collaborators PO. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(6):383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30056-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health O. Hepatitis B vaccines: WHO position paper, July 2017 - recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):223–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lucifora J, Protzer U. Attacking hepatitis B virus cccDNA--the holy grail to hepatitis B cure. J Hepatol. 2016;64(1 Suppl):S41–s48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Maucort-Boulch D, de Martel C, Franceschi S, Plummer M. Fraction and incidence of liver cancer attributable to hepatitis B and C viruses worldwide. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(12):2471–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31280.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Slagle BL, Bouchard MJ. Role of HBx in hepatitis B virus persistence and its therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Virol. 2018;30:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2018.01.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Seto WK, Lo YR, Pawlotsky JM, Yuen MF. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2313–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31865-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Jen CL, Su J, Wang LY, You SL, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: data from the REVEAL-HBV cohort study. Liver Int. 2010;30(3):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02147.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ulcickas Yood M, Quesenberry CP Jr, Guo D, Caldwell C, Wells K, Shan J, et al. Incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2007;46(1):107–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21642.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Andersen ES, Omland LH, Jepsen P, Krarup H, Christensen PB, Obel N, et al. Risk of all-type cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and pancreatic cancer in patients infected with hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22(10):828–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.12391.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Ji J. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and cancers at other sites among patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Sweden. J Med Virol. 2014;86(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.23754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global Cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends--an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cross AJ, Ferrucci LM, Risch A, Graubard BI, Ward MH, Park Y, et al. A large prospective study of meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an investigation of potential mechanisms underlying this association. Cancer Res. 2010;70(6):2406–14. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3929.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kirkegaard H, Johnsen NF, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Overvad K, Tjønneland A. Association of adherence to lifestyle recommendations and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective Danish cohort study. Bmj. 2010;341(oct26 2):c5504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dahm CC, Keogh RH, Spencer EA, Greenwood DC, Key TJ, Fentiman IS, et al. Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study using food diaries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):614–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq092.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Su FH, Le TN, Muo CH, Te SA, Sung FC, Yeh CC. Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection Associated with Increased Colorectal Cancer Risk in Taiwanese Population. Viruses. 2020;12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010097.

  17. 17.

    Ma C, Gurol ME, Huang Z, Lichtenstein AH, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective study. Neurology. 2019;93(5):e445–57. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007853.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang C, Yuan Y, Zheng M, Pan A, Wang M, Zhao M, et al. Association of age of onset of hypertension with cardiovascular diseases and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(23):2921–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Siyin ST, Liu T, Li W, Yao N, Xu G, Qu J, et al. A prospective follow-up study of the relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and primary liver cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07665-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Liu T, Siyin ST, Yao N, Duan N, Xu G, Li W, et al. Relationship between high-sensitivity C reactive protein and the risk of gallstone disease: results from the Kailuan cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e035880. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, et al. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation. 2016;134(6):441–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    J, J. Chinese guidelines on prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007;35(5):390.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lau B, Cole SR, Gange SJ. Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(2):244–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JC, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):555–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a39056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kamiza AB, Su FH, Wang WC, Sung FC, Chang SN, Yeh CC. Chronic hepatitis infection is associated with extrahepatic cancer development: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):861. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2918-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Song C, Lv J, Liu Y, Chen JG, Ge Z, Zhu J, et al. Associations between hepatitis B virus infection and risk of all Cancer types. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e195718. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Patel BB, Lipka S, Shen H, Davis-Yadley AH, Viswanathan P. Establishing the link between hepatitis B virus infection and colorectal adenoma. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6(5):492–7. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liang J, Shang Y. Estrogen and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75(1):225–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183708.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Niv Y. Estrogen receptor β expression and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(12):1438–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000471.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research third expert report on diet, nutrition, physical activity, and Cancer: impact and future directions. J Nutr. 2020;150(4):663–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lennon H, Sperrin M, Badrick E, Renehan AG. The obesity paradox in Cancer: a review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18(9):56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0539-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lee DH, Giovannucci EL. The obesity paradox in Cancer: epidemiologic insights and perspectives. Curr Nutr Rep. 2019;8(3):175–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-019-00280-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boffetta P, Hashibe M. Alcohol and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(2):149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70577-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Noordzij M, Leffondré K, van Stralen KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW, Jager KJ. When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(11):2670–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lucifora J, Arzberger S, Durantel D, Belloni L, Strubin M, Levrero M, et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein is essential to initiate and maintain virus replication after infection. J Hepatol. 2011;55(5):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen Y, Tian Z. HBV-induced immune imbalance in the development of HCC. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02048.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dejean A, Lugassy C, Zafrani S, Tiollais P, Brechot C. Detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in pancreas, kidney and skin of two human carriers of the virus. J Gen Virol. 1984;65(Pt 3):651–5. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-65-3-651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mason A, Wick M, White H, Perrillo R. Hepatitis B virus replication in diverse cell types during chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 1993;18(4):781–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840180406.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bock CT, Schwinn S, Locarnini S, Fyfe J, Manns MP, Trautwein C, et al. Structural organization of the hepatitis B virus minichromosome. J Mol Biol. 2001;307(1):183–96. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4481.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Newbold JE, Xin H, Tencza M, Sherman G, Dean J, Bowden S, et al. The covalently closed duplex form of the hepadnavirus genome exists in situ as a heterogeneous population of viral minichromosomes. J Virol. 1995;69(6):3350–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.69.6.3350-3357.1995.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the staff and participants of the Kailuan study for their important contributions.

Funding

This work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program to Dr. Hanping Shi (No. 2017YFC1309200).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tong Liu, Wenqiang Li and Youcheng Zhang contributed equally to this manuscript and share the first author.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Clinical Nutrition, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, 100038, China

    Tong Liu, Qi Zhang, Mengmeng Song, Kangping Zhang & Hanping Shi

  2. Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing, 100038, China

    Tong Liu, Qi Zhang, Mengmeng Song, Kangping Zhang & Hanping Shi

  3. Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation, Beijing, 100038, China

    Tong Liu, Qi Zhang, Mengmeng Song, Kangping Zhang & Hanping Shi

  4. Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China

    Wenqiang Li

  5. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China

    Youcheng Zhang

  6. Department of graduate school, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China

    Youcheng Zhang

  7. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China

    Sarah Tan Siyin

  8. Department of Hepatological Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China

    Siqing Liu

Authors
  1. Tong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenqiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youcheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Tan Siyin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mengmeng Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kangping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Siqing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hanping Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the manuscript. TL: Methodology, Software, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. WQL, Methodology, Software. YCZ: Reviewing and Editing. STS: Supervision, Validation. QZ: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. MMS: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. KPZ: Investigation. SQL: Conceptualization, Supervision. HPS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Resources.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Siqing Liu or Hanping Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kailuan General Hospital and Beijing Shijitan Hospital. Informed consent forms were signed by the participants or their legal representatives. The Kailuan General Hospital’s ethics committee granted the administrative permission to access the database used in our manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Li, W., Zhang, Y. et al. Associations between hepatitis B virus infection and risk of colorectal Cancer: a population-based prospective study. BMC Cancer 21, 1119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08846-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08846-w

Keywords

  • Hepatitis B virus
  • Incidence
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Competing risk models
  • Cohort

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us