Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of glycosidic derivatives of lawsone in melanoma cancer cell

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 662 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Melanoma is a malignant cancer that affects melanocytes and is considered the most aggressive skin-type cancer. The prevalence for melanoma cancer for the last five year is about one million cases. The impact caused of this and other types of cancer, revel the importance of research into potential active compounds. The natural products are an important source of compounds with biological activity and research with natural products may enable the discovery of compounds with potential activity in tumor cells.

Methods

The Sulforhodamine B was used to determine cell density after treatment with lawsone derivatives. Apoptosis and necrosis were analyzed by flow cytometer. Morphological changes were observed by fluorescence using the Phalloidin/FITC and DAPI stains. The clonogenic and wound healing assays were used to analyze reduction of colonies formation and migratory capacity of melanoma cells, respectability.

Results

In pharmacological screening, seven compounds derived from lawsone were considered to have high cytotoxic activity (GI > 75%). Three compounds were selected to assess the inhibitory concentration for 50% of cells (IC50), and the compound 9, that has IC50 5.3 μM in melanoma cells, was selected for further analyses in this cell line. The clonogenic assay showed that the compound is capable of reducing the formation of melanoma colonies at 10.6 μM concentration. The compound induced apoptotic morphological changes in melanoma cells and increased by 50% the cells dying from apoptosis. Also, this compound reduced the migratory capacity of melanoma cells.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the evaluated lawsone derivatives have potential activity on tumor cells. The compound 9 is capable of inducing cell death by apoptosis in melanoma cells (B16F10).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cancer is a non-transmissible chronic disease that affects more than 50,5 million people in the world [1]. It has the second highest mortality rate, surpassed only by cardiovascular diseases. It is considered a serious public health matter responsible for about 9.9 million deaths in 2020, representing 1 in 8 and 1 in 11 deaths for men and woman, respectively [2, 3].

Melanoma is the most lethal among the skin type cancers [4]. Data on the incidence of cutaneous melanoma show that more than 300 thousand people were affected by the disease in 2020, in the last five years, there was about one million cases [5]. The risk factors associated with the development of cutaneous melanoma are linked with environmental factors, such as prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and genetic predisposition [4].

The global impact caused by the high incidence rates and prevalence of cancer, associated with the heterogeneity of the disease, which presents different forms and specificities and the chemoresistance developed by tumor cells to antineoplastic treatment reveal the importance of the search for new bioactive compounds with potential antitumor activity [6]. Natural products are an important source of compounds with biological activity against several diseases and they may also prove to be less harmful and toxic [7]. As an example, the studies with α-mangustin, an xanthone showed promising in vitro results for the reduction of melanin production and can be a promising cosmetic compound [8]. In the context of cancer, resveratrol a naturally occurring polyphenol that has activity against cancers by acting on several molecular targets. Resveratrol can act, for example, by inhibiting the expression of Programmed death-1 in the T cell membrane. This inhibition prevents the receptor from being bound to the PD-1 L expressed in tumor cells, which would inhibit the cytotoxic activity of T cells [7, 9]. About 40% of the drugs approved for commercialization and 64.9% of the existing antineoplastic drugs are natural products or are derived from natural products [10]. Drugs like doxorubicin and vincristine used in anticancer therapy are examples of drugs that had their origin in animal and plant sources, respectively [11, 12].

The secondary metabolite naphthoquinone is an example of a class of compounds of plant and animal origin that has biological activity on several diseases, including some types of cancers [13]. Lawsone is a naphthoquinone widely studied in terms of its biological activity. This compound, found in Lawsonia inermis, is a precursor in the synthesis of compounds with potential biological activity, and many of its derivatives have antitumor, antibacterial and antifungal activity [14, 15].

It is important to think that, even though some chemical compounds do not become a drug used in the treatment of diseases, they can serve as a precursor to new compounds with the potential to generate new drugs [14,15,16]. For example, the synthesis of atovaquone from the lawsone compound resulted in a compound with antimalarial activity [17]. Besides, changes in the chemical structure of compounds can give better pharmacokinetic profiles to the new synthesized compounds, as well as increased it cytotoxicity to tumor cells and reduce side effects [16, 17]. In this way, we can consider that chemical changes in lawsone compounds can result in newly and improved biologically active compounds [18, 19]. So, considering the hypothesis that synthetic derivatives of lawsone may present potential cytotoxic activity against tumor cells, this study was performed aiming to evaluate the cytotoxic activity of compounds structurally correlated with lawsone in three distinct tumor cell lines.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Dulbeccos’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), Trypsin, Dimethylsulfoxide, DAPI, Sulforhodamine B (SRB), Triton X 100 and Phalloidin-FITC were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), antibiotic (penicillin 10,000 U/ml; streptomycin 10,000 mg/ml) and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) from Gibco (Life Technologies, India) EDTA, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (Rubidox, Bergamo), Trichloroacetic acid (Neon), Acetic acid (Synth), Methyl alcohol (Neon), TRIS-base (Inlab Confiança, Brazil), Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit (Life Technology™, Carlsbad, California), Accutase® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Califórnia, EUA).

Lawsone derivatives

Lawsone (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphtoquinone) and sixteen of its derivatives were obtained in partnership with the Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). Lawsone was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Brazil, São Paulo. Compounds 1 [20], 4 [21] and 9–16 [22] were prepared according to literature. Data regarding the synthesis and characterization of compounds 2, 3 and 5–8 are described in Additional file 1. A stock solution of the lawsone derivatives was made by dissolving the compound in dimethylsulfoxide solvent (DMSO) and kept refrigerated at − 4 °C.

Cell lines

The cell lines of lung carcinoma (A549), melanoma (B16F10) and glioma (C6) were purchased from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. The cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in Dulbeccos’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic (10,000 U/mL penicillin; 10,000 mg/mL streptomycin).

Determination of cell growth inhibition and IC50

A first screening of the cytotoxic activity of lawsone derivatives (Fig. 1) was done by Sulforhodamine B assay (SRB), following a protocol adapted from [23, 24]. The cell lines A549, B16F10 and C6 were seeded in 96-wells plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well for A549 and C6 and 3 × 103 for B16F10 in 200 μL of medium. After 24 h, the cells were treated with lawsone derivatives at a concentration of 25 μM for 72 h. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 0.05%) was used as vehicle control and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride 10 μM was used was positive control. Three independent experiments were performed in quadruplicate.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structure of evaluated compounds

Full size image

After treatment, the supernatant was discarded, and the cells were fixed with 100 μL of trichloroacetic acid 30% for 1 h at 4 °C and stained with 100 μL of SRB (0.057% w/v) for 30 min. Excess dye was removed by washing the plate with 1% acetic acid for 3 times, and intracellular dye was dissolved in 200 μL of TRIS (10 mM; pH 10,5) for 30 min. Absorbance was read in a microplate reader (Synergy H1, Biotek, VT, EUA) at 510 nm. The absorbance was converted in growth inhibition by the following equation:

$$ \%\mathrm{Growth}\ \mathrm{inhibition}=\left\{100-\left[\left(\mathrm{Abs}\ \left(\mathrm{treated}\ \mathrm{cells}\right)/\mathrm{Abs}.\left(\mathrm{vehicle}\ \mathrm{control}\right)\right)\ \mathrm{x}\ 100\right]\right\} $$

The lawsone derivatives that showed the highest growth inhibition were selected to determine the IC50 using the same protocol described above. The cell lines A549, B16F10 and C6 were treated with lawsone and the derivatives 9, 10, 11 in concentrations ranging from 0,8 to 25 μM.

Clonogenic assay

To assess the ability of lawsone derivatives to reduce melanoma colonies, the clonogenic assay was performed following a protocol adapted from [25]. B16F10 cells were seeded in a concentration of 300 cells per well in a 6-well plate. After 24 h the cells were treated with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM of compound 9 for 72 h at the same conditions. Dimethylsulfoxide (0.02%) and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (10 μM) were used as vehicle control and positive death control, respectively. After 6 days, the cells were fixed with methanol:acetic acid (3:1) for 5 min and stained with violet crystal 0.02% in water, for 30 min. Colony formation analyzes were performed using ImageJ 1.46 software.

Wound healing assay

The wound-healing assay was made using the protocol with modifications of Liang and colleagues [26]. B16F10 cells were seeded in 12-well plate at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well. After 24 h, the cell monolayer was scratched with a tip of p200 pipette creating a straight line wound, the debris were removed by washing with PBS and the cells were treated with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM the derivative 9 for 24 h. Dimethylsulfoxide (0.02%) was used as vehicle control and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride 10 μM was used as positive control. The images were acquired 0, 24 and 48 h of the scratch using a microscopy Olympus. The percentage of wound closure was calculated for each treatment and controls comparing the time points 24 and 48 h with the time point zero, using the equation proposed by [27]. The images were analyzed using ImageJ 1.46 software.

Cell morphology analysis

B16F10 cells were seeded in a 48-well plate at density of 5 × 103 cell per well. After 24 h, cells were treated with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM of derivative 9 for 24 h. Dimethylsulfoxide (0.02%) was used as vehicle control and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride 10 μM was used as positive control. After treatment cells were washed with 1x PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min. Cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X 100 solution for 15 min and 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) for 30 min. The cytoskeleton was stained with Phalloidin-FITC 25 μg/mL for 30 min and the cell nucleus was stained with DAPI 1 μg / mL for 10 min, in the dark. The images were acquired using a microscopy Olympus, IX81 and the morphological changes of nucleus and cytoplasm, as well as chromatin fragmentation [28].

Cell death evaluation by Annexin V/PI flow cytometry assay

B16F10 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate ate a density of 5 × 104 cell per well. After 24 h, cells were treated with derivative 9 with the concentrations of 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM for 24 h. Dimethylsulfoxide (0.02%) was used as vehicle control and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride 10 μM was used as positive control. After treatment, the cells were harvested using Accutase®, washed with 1x PBS and stained using Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit following the manufactory instructions. The cells were analyzed in a flow cytometer (Attune NxT Acoustic Focusing Cytometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistical analysis

For all experiments, a 95% confidence interval was used and p < 0.05 values considered statistically significant. Analyzes and graphs as well as IC50 were obtained using the GraphPad Prism 8 program. Shapiro-Wilk normality test was applied to assess the normal distribution of the data. For comparison between groups, ANOVA was used, followed by Dunnett post-test.

Results

Lawsone derivatives reduce the viability of tumor cell lines

Sixteen lawsone derivatives (Fig. 1) were evaluated for their effect in reducing cell growth of three tumor cell lines, A549 (lung carcinoma), B16F10 (melanoma) and C6 (glioma). The compounds were tested by pharmacological screening at a single concentration of 25 μM, for 72 h using the Sulforhodamine B assay.

The compounds were classified according to their potential to inhibit cell proliferation using the following intensity scale: compounds which showed a percentage of growth inhibition (GI) lower than 50% were classified as low cytotoxic activity, between 51 and 75% as intermediate cytotoxic activity and higher than 75% as high cytotoxic activity [29]. The compounds 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 16 showed a percentage of growth inhibition lower than 50% in all cell lineage evaluates were classified as having low cytotoxic activity. Other compounds evaluated (2, 3 and 4) showed growth inhibition ranging from low, intermediate and high cytotoxic activity in the cell lines. Seven compounds (1, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15) showed high cytotoxic activity (GI > 75%) in the three cell lines. Among the seven compounds, six of them (1, 9, 10, 11 and 15) showed GI > 90% for the three cell lines (Table 1).

Table 1 Percentage of growth inhibition in B16F10, C6 and A549 after treatment with synthetic lawsone derivatives
Full size table

The activity of lawsone, compound of origin in the synthesis of the derivatives studied in this research, was also evaluated. It was possible to observe that lawsone showed low cytotoxic activity (GI = 34.17%) in A549 and high cytotoxic activity (GI = 78.7%) in C6. It was not possible to observe cytotoxic activity in B16F10 at a concentration of 25 μM.

Doxorubicin, an important chemotherapeutic with cytotoxic activity on several types of cancer, was used as a positive control to estimate the viability of tumor cells [30]. This drug, as well as the compounds evaluated in this study, is a quinone and has a structure capable of releasing free radicals that cause cellular stress [31]. The drug showed a high growth inhibition in the three tumor lines evaluated (GI 77.1–99.2%) at 10 μM.

Due to the high cytotoxic activity of compounds 9, 10 and 11 that showed GI > 90% and their structural chemical characteristics, these compounds were selected to determine the maximum concentration that inhibits 50% of cells growth (IC50). The growth inhibition profile and the IC50 values obtained are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 2, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Growth inhibitation of A549, B16F10 and C6 cell lines after treatment with compunds 9 (A), 10 (B) and 11 (C). Values of mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments after treatments with synthetic derivatives of lawsone for 72 h. Doxorubicin 10 μM was used as positive control, respectively

Full size image
Table 2 IC50 values of compounds 9, 10 and 11 and lawsone against C6, B16-F10 and A549
Full size table

The IC50 values expressed in Table 2 show that, compared with lawsone, the three synthetic derivatives analyzed showed to be more cytotoxic to cell lines. Among them, the compound 9 and 10 showed the highest cytotoxic activity, both in B16F10. When compared with lawsone, the three synthetic derivatives analyzed showed to be more cytotoxic to cell lines. Because of its low concentration of IC50 of compound 9 on three cell lines, and the fact of melanoma has the lowest IC50 for this compound, as well as the severity of the melanoma and the importance of studies with potential antitumor compounds for highly lethal cancer, this compound was selected for the next assays in B16F10.

Compounds 9 reduces the ability of tumor cells to form clones and colonies

The clonogenic assay was performed to evaluate the ability of a single melanoma cell (B16F10) to form clones and colonies after treatment with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM of compound 9 for 72 h. These concentrations were defined based on the IC50 value and are equivalent to half and twice the IC50 value. A reduction in the number of colonies derived from cells treated with the two highest concentrations (5.3 and 10.6 μM) was evident, as showed in the Fig. 3A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibitory effect of molecule 9 on the formation of B16F10 cells colonies. A Representative experiment showing colonies formed after treatment with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM of compound 9 and 10 days of growth B Percentage of colony formation after treatment relative control. Dox = doxorubicin positive control. Mean ± SD obtained from two independent experiments. The analysis of difference between treatments and control was performed by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett post-test (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01

Full size image

The analyzes of the results obtained from two independent experiments (Fig. 3B), revealed that the treatment with the highest concentration of compound 9 (10.6 μM) reduced the capacity of colony formation by approximately 75% compared to negative control. Doxorubicin reduced the capacity of melanoma cells to form clones and colonies by 100% at a concentration of 10 μM.

The cells of the tumor line B16F10 show reduced migration when exposed to compound 9

To evaluate the migration capacity of melanoma cells after treatment with compound 9, the wound healing assay was performed. Three treatment concentrations (2.3, 5.3 and 10.6 μM) were used, and the analyzes were performed at times 0, 24 and 48 h. As result, it was observed that the cells of the negative control (DMSO 0.02%) migrated to the center of the scratch and the percentage of closure at 48 h was 100% (Fig. 4A). In the treatment with compound 9, a reduction in the migratory capacity of melanoma cells was observed at 24 and 48 h compared to the control (Fig. 4B). The highest concentration evaluated (10.6 μM) inhibited the closure of the scratch about 80% over 24 h compared to the control treatment free. Comparatively, compound 9 reduced wound closure more than the positive control doxorubicin. No significant reduction was observed in the lowest treatment concentrations (2.3 and 5.3 μM) with the compound 9.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Inhibition of melanoma cells after treatment with compound 9. A Representative experiment of the Wound Healing test at 0, 24 and 48 h of treatment with compound 9 (2.6, 5.3 and 10.3 μM). 40x magnification. 100 μm scale bar. B Percentage wound closure. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Doxorubicin (10 μM) was used as positive control. Analysis between groups was performed with Anova Two-Way, followed by a Dunnett post-test. Comparisons were made between treatments and control of different times (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01

Full size image

Although no statistically significant reduction has been observed in the two lowest concentrations treatment (2.3 and 5.3 μM), it is visually evident in the Fig. 4A that the wound was not completely closed 48 h after the treatment.

The cells treated with compound 9 show apoptosis characteristics

The main structural changes in the B16F10 cell lines after treatment with compound 9, were evaluated by staining the actin filaments and cell nucleus with Phalloidin/FITC and DAPI, respectively. The qualitative results of the treatment with 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM have shown that the compound 9 promoted changes in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the cells.

It is possible to observe through the staining of the F-actin filaments that the organization of these fibers in melanoma cells became altered after treatment with the compound 9. Several stress bundles were observed in the cytoskeleton, which are arranged in a disorganized manner as they are exposed to the treatments with different concentrations of compound 9 (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of compound 9 on the cystoskeleton and cell nucleus morphology of the B16F10

Full size image

The nucleus of the cells showed changes characteristic of apoptosis, such as DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation after treatment with compound 9 (Fig. 5). These changes were observed in all the concentrations; however, they were more frequent in the highest concentration of 10.6 μM. The drug doxorubicin (10 μM), used as positive control of apoptosis, caused changes in the cell nucleus that were similar to the higher concentration of the compound 9.

Morphological changes observed with DAPI and Phalloidin/FITC staining in B16F10 cells after treatment with compound 9 with the concentrations of 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM after 24 h. Full arrows represent DNA fragmentation; arrowheads, chromatin condensation; hollow arrow apoptotic projections of cytoplasm and thin arrow, stress bundles. 200x magnification. Scale bar = 20 μm. Insert scale bar = 10 μm.

The compound 9 increases early apoptosis in melanoma after treatment

To evaluate the type of cell death induced by the compound 9 in B16F10, a flow cytometry assay was performed. The melanoma cells were treated with three concentrations, 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM, of the test compound, for 24 h. Then, they were stained with Annexin V/FITC and Propidium Iodide (PI).

Figure 6A illustrates a representative experiment of a dot plot graphs obtained in a flow cytometry experiment, indicating viable cells (Annexin V−/IP-), early apoptosis (Annexin V + / IP-), late apoptosis (Annexin V + / IP +) and necrosis (Annexin V- / IP-). It was possible to observe that compound 9 reduced the percentage of viable cells in the highest concentration (10.6 μM). In addition, the compound induced an increase in the percentage of melanoma cells dying by apoptosis (Fig. 6B). There was no increase in the percentage of cells in apoptosis at the other concentrations evaluated (2.6 and 5.3 μM). There was no increase in melanoma cells dying from necrosis at the tested concentrations. The drug doxorubicin (10 μM), used as positive control, reduced the percentage of viable melanoma cells and significantly increased the percentage of cells in necrosis (Annexin V−/IP-).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Evaluation of apoptosis and necrosis induction of compound 9 in melanoma cells. A Analysis of B16F10 cells by flow cytometry after treatment with compound 9 with the concentrations of 2.6, 5.3 and 10.6 μM for 24 h. Viable cells (Annexin V−/IP-), early apoptosis (Annexin V+/PI-), late apoptosis (Annexin V+/PI+) and necrosis (Annexin V−/PI+). The negative control was treated with vehicle of the tested compound (DMSO 0.05%). Doxorubicin (10 μM) was used as positive control. B Graphs of percentage of live, apoptosis and necrosis cell. Data presented with mean ± SD values from three independent experiments. The analysis between groups and negative control was performed with ANOVA, followed by Dunnett post-test. (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01 and (***) p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

Lawsonia inermis (Henna) is an important plant species, source of bioactive compounds with therapeutic activity. As described by Ishteyaque et al., henna extract has showed cytotoxic activity against lung, colon and liver cancer cell lines and its activity can be attributed to lawsone, one of the active compounds in the plant responsible for the cytotoxic activity in tumor cells [32]. Studies with derivatives of this compound have been widely carried out in order to find potent compounds against different types of tumors [18]. The process of discovering a new drug goes through several stages ranging from the selection of the molecule and preclinical tests to more advanced tests in humans. Carrying out studies on the reuse of medications in another illness can reduce the time to discover potential medications [33]. In addition, studies of derivatives of known drugs may produce more potent and less toxic compounds [22].

It was possible to observe a reduction in the growth of lung carcinoma, melanoma and glioma cells after treatment with synthetic derivatives of lawsone. To evaluate the effect of the compounds, the SRB assay was used, an anionic dye used to evaluate cell viability based on the measurement of the content of proteins that bind to it electrostatically [24]. Among the sixteen compounds evaluated, the compounds 1, 9, 10, 11 and 15 showed growth inhibition higher than 90% (GI > 90%) in the three cell lines and IC50 were carried out for three of them (9, 10 and 11). The etherification of the hydroxyl group of lawsone led, in general, to compounds with enhanced activity (compounds 9–11 and 13–15) while lawsone and the derivatives bearing a free hydroxyl group at C-2 of the naphthoquinone ring (compounds 4–8) were less active. The presence of the C-2 hydroxyl group enhances the polarity of the compounds, which impair cell membrane permeation. The low activity of compounds 12 and 16, can be explained by their high polar character, since these compounds have deacetylated sugar moieties in their structures. This would impair cell membrane permeation. Ottoni and colleagues evaluated glycosidic lawsone derivatives, with chemical characteristics similar to those evaluated in this research, in different cell lines of breast adenocarcinoma (SKBR-3, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7), they also observed greater cytotoxicity of compounds 9, 10 and 11 in tumor cells compared to non-tumor cells of human gingival fibroblasts (HCT) [22]. One important chemical characteristic of this compounds is that they are quinones and this structures has the capacity of release electrons and consequently form free radicals, such as superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide, causing damage to cell structure [31, 34].

The melanoma, despite of its low incidence, is the most aggressive cancer among skin cancers and is responsible for about 80% of the causes of death [35]. In addition to being highly aggressive, malignant melanoma cancer is also resistant to drugs [36]. There are some characteristics in melanoma cells that make them more aggressive compared to other cell types of other cancers. This can be justified by some molecular characteristics that imply pathogenesis and clinical response to treatments [37]. Research for new compounds with cytotoxic potential may promote the discovery of new drugs for the treatment of melanoma.

The clonogenic assay showed that the compound 9 reduces the number and size of melanoma cell colonies in relation to the control, corroborating with the results found in the SRB assay. This result shows that the compound is capable of inhibiting the production of clones from a single cell, it also shows the cellular response to treatment in a longer evaluation period, in which the cells were maintained in a viable condition of growth [38]. Chipoline and colleagues [39] observed in their study with 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives that naphthoquinone compounds are able to reduce the formation of oral squamous cell carcinoma colonies (SSC-9), without reducing the viability of non-cells fibroblast tumor cells. Caro and colleagues [40] also observed that the naphthoquinone derivative 8-hydroxy-2-(2-tenoyl)naphtho[2,3- b] thiophene-4,9-dione reduced the formation of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell colonies (HT-29). This same compound did not reduce the viability of fibroblasts.

Melanoma cancer has a high capacity to generate metastases. This characteristic is mainly related to the migratory capacity and mobility that cells of this type of cancer have [41]. Among cancer-related deaths, about 90% are related to metastatic disease [42]. Several steps are necessary before the complete installation of melanoma cells in other tissues. These are linked to the complex behavioral dynamics of cells, mobility, cytoskeleton and connection to the tumor microenvironment, as well as production of growth factors and cytokines. Although metastasis is a key factor in the aggressiveness of melanoma, there are no drugs that specifically inhibit or reduce this migration and invasion of cells to other tissues [43, 44].

The results obtained in the wound healing assay showed that the compound 9 was able to inhibit the migration of melanoma cells (B16F10) at the highest concentration evaluated (10.3 μM). This activity can be attributed to decreased proliferative capacity by melanoma cells exposed to treatment, as well as by the activity of the compound on the disposition of the actin filaments that compound the cytoskeleton, as observed in the experiment with the Phalloidin/FITC probe. Since cytoskeleton is a fundamental part in cell movement and can influence the migratory capacity of cells [44].

Several studies demonstrate using different analyzes that naphthoquinone derivatives show cytotoxic activity in tumor cells through the induction of apoptosis [32, 45]. Chipoline and colleagues [39] observed that an 1,4-naphthoquinone derivative analyzed in their research induced apoptosis in SCC-9 cells (oral squamous cell carcinoma). The main changes observed were cell morphology alterations with disorganization of microtubules and inhibition of topoisomerase [39]. The topoisomerase enzyme is responsible for breaking and repairing DNA strands [46]. Im and colleagues [47] also showed apoptosis after treatment with a naphthoquinone-derived compound in human colon cancer cells (HCT116). This compound increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), induced the activation of caspases 3, 8 and 9.

By staining the nucleus and filaments of F-actin, the cells showed apoptosis characteristics after treatment with different concentrations of the compound 9 and doxorubicin, used as a positive control. One of the most observed changes in the cell nucleus, in the concentrations tested, was DNA fragmentation. The fragmentation of genetic material is characteristic of the programmed cell death, since the apoptotic stimulus causes activation of the cascade of caspases that cleaves and activates the DNA fragmentation, allowing the breaking of DNA molecules into pieces with 180 pairs of bases [48]. In addition, another important characteristic of the apoptotic death is the high condensation of chromatin [49]. This was observed in the highest treatment concentration (10.6 μM) of the compound 9, as well as in the treatment with doxorubicin.

Alterations in the actin filaments are present in tumor cells and it implies the tumor invasion process [50]. Cellular shrinkage and morphological changes are characteristic of apoptosis [51]. The analysis of the cytoplasm of the B16F10 after treatment with the compound 9 revealed a reduction in the size and changes in the morphology of the cells, with loss of the fibroblast aspect. In addition, changes in the disposition of the actin filaments, important structures responsible for numerous functions in the cell, such as morphology and migration, were observed [52].

Apoptosis is a death mechanism observed in several tumor cell lines treated with naphthoquinonic compounds [14]. Oliveira and colleagues [53] observed that lawsone derivatives induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells (DU-145), breast (MCF-7) and lung carcinoma (A549). The analyzes of cytotoxic activity of the compound in A549 showed that the compound was able to inhibit cell migration by 85% at the highest treatment concentration. In addition, it induced cell cycle arrest in the Sub G1 phase and increased the percentage of A549 cells in initial apoptosis by 50% at the highest treatment concentration with the lawsone derivative [53].

In the present study, the melanoma cell line (B16F10) showed high expression of Annexin V after treatment with the highest concentration of the compound 9, indicating an increase in cells in apoptosis. Annexin V is a member of the calcium-dependent Annexin protein superfamily [54]. This protein plays a role in binding to phosphatidylserine, externalized in the membrane of cells undergoing apoptosis. When an apoptotic stimulus occurs, the cells begin to externalize phosphatidylserine, which is normally located in the inner plasma membrane. It works as a signal for phagocytes to carry out efferocytosis, removal of apoptotic cell bodies from the body [55].

In conclusion, the results of this research show that derivatives of lawsone are an important source of possible compounds with cytotoxic activity in tumor cells. Compound 9, synthesized from the lawsone compound causes a reduction in cell proliferation and viability, mainly due to characteristic changes of apoptosis in melanoma cells (B16F10). This type of death can be less harmful because it is a largely regulated cell death, in which there is no leakage of the cytoplasmic and nuclear material of the cells, reducing or preventing an inflammatory process [56]. Although compound 9 has shown promising results, it is necessary to further evaluate the mechanisms of action of this compound with subsequent analysis in in vivo tumor models.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the correspondingauthor on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

A549:

Human Lung Carcinoma Epithelial cell line

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

B16-F10:

Melanoma cell line

C6:

Glioma cell line

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidine-2-Phenylindole Dihydrochloride

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

DMSO:

Dimethylsulfoxide

DOX:

Doxorubicin

EDTA:

Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

FITC:

Fluorescein Isothiocyanate

GI50 :

Degree of inhibition for 50% of cells

IC50 :

Inhibitory concentration for 50% of cells

PBS:

Phosphate Buffered Saline

PI:

Propidium Iodide

SFB:

Fetal bovine serum

References

  1. GLOBOCAN - World Health Organization (WHO). Estimated number of new cases in 2020, worldwide, both sexes, all ages. Int Agency Res Cancer. 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home. Accessed 19 Jan 2021.

  2. Instituto Nacional do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Incidência de câncer no Brasil: Estimativa 2020. https://www.inca.gov.br/publicacoes/livros/estimativa-2020-incidencia-de-cancer-no-brasil. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.

  3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hessler M, Jalilian E, Xu Q, Reddy S, Horton L, Elkin K, et al. Melanoma biomarkers and their potential application for in vivo diagnostic imaging modalities. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancer IA for R on, Organization WH. World fact sheets cancers. Globocan 2020. 2020;419:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yeldag G, Rice A, Del Río Hernández A. Chemoresistance and the self-maintaining tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(12):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10120471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashrafizadeh M, Javanmardi S, Moradi-Ozarlou M, Mohammadinejad R, Farkhondeh T, Samarghandian S, et al. Natural products and phytochemical nanoformulations targeting mitochondria in oncotherapy: an updated review on resveratrol. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(4):BSR20200257. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20200257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou S, Yotsumoto H, Tian Y, Sakamoto K. α-Mangostin suppressed melanogenesis in B16F10 murine melanoma cells through GSK3β and ERK signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Reports. 2021;26:100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83(3):770–803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandão HN, David JP, Couto RD, Nascimento JAP, David JM. Química e farmacologia de quimioterápicos antineoplásicos derivados de plantas. Quim Nova. 2010;33(6):1359–69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422010000600026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Octavia Y, Tocchetti CG, Gabrielson KL, Janssens S, Crijns HJ, Moens AL. Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52(6):1213–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.03.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aminin D, Polonik S. 1,4-naphthoquinones: some biological properties and application. Chem Pharm Bull. 2020;68(1):46–57. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c19-00911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bin WS, Tao Z, Li P. Lawsone suppresses azoxymethane mediated colon cancer in rats and reduces proliferation of DLD-1 cells via NF-κB pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nittayananta W, Limsuwan S, Srichana T, Sae-Wong C, Amnuaikit T. Oral spray containing plant-derived compounds is effective against common oral pathogens. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;90:80–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aung TN, Qu Z, Kortschak RD, Adelson DL. Understanding the effectiveness of natural compound mixtures in cancer through their molecular mode of action. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Dzinjalamala FK, Nyirenda OM, Masonga R, Laurens MB, et al. A longitudinal trial comparing chloroquine as monotherapy or in combination with artesunate, azithromycin or atovaquone-proguanil to treat malaria. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jordão AK, Vargas MD, Pinto AC, Da Silva FDC, Ferreira VF. Lawsone in organic synthesis. RSC Adv. 2015;5(83):67909–43. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA12785H.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wellington KW. Understanding cancer and the anticancer activities of naphthoquinones-a review. RSC Adv. 2015;5(26):20309–38. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA13547D.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ottoni FM, Isidório RG, Alves RJ, Speziali NL. Two polymorphs of 2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)naphthalene-1,4-dione: Solvent-dependent crystallization. Acta Crystallogr Sect E Crystallogr Commun. 2018;74(Pt-12):1731–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Geralda IR, Flaviano Melo O, Ricardo José A, Nivaldo LS. Crystal structure of 2-hydroxy-3-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)naphthalene-1,4-dione. Acta Crystallogr Sect E Crystallogr Commun. 2018;74(Pt-9):1319–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ottoni FM, Gomes ER, Pádua RM, Oliveira MC, Silva IT, Alves RJ. Synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of glycosidic derivatives of lawsone against breast cancer cell lines. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2020;30(2):126817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kasinski AL, Kelnar K, Stahlhut C, Orellana E, Zhao J, Shimer E, et al. A combinatorial microRNA therapeutics approach to suppressing non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34(27):3547–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Orellana E, Kasinski A. Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay in cell culture to investigate cell proliferation. Bio-Protocol. 2016;6(21):e1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matafora V, Farris F, Restuccia U, Tamburri S, Martano G, Bernardelli C, et al. Amyloid aggregates accumulate in melanoma metastasis modulating YAP activity. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(9):e50446. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):329–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yarrow JC, Perlman ZE, Westwood NJ, Mitchison TJ. A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods. BMC Biotechnol. 2004;4(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Andrade LN, Lima TC, Amaral RG, Do Ó, Pessoa C, De Moraes Filho MO, et al. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of structurally correlated p-menthane derivatives. Molecules. 2015;20(7):13264–80. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carneiro ABA, Pinto EJS, Ribeiro IF, Magalhães MRG, Monteiro Neto M de AB. Efeito da Astrocaryum aculeatum (Tucumã) na toxicidade da Doxorrubicina: modelo experimental in vivo. Acta Paul Enferm 2017;30(3):233–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201700036.

  31. Injac R, Strukelj B. Recent advances in protection against doxorubicin-induced toxicity. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008;7(6):497–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/153303460800700611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ishteyaque S, Mishra A, Mohapatra S, Singh A, Bhatta RS, Tadigoppula N, et al. In vitro: cytotoxicity, apoptosis and ameliorative potential of Lawsonia inermis extract in human lung, Colon and Liver Cancer cell line. Cancer Investig. 2020;38(8–9):476–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2020.1811300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kirtonia A, Gala K, Fernandes SG, Pandya G, Pandey AK, Sethi G, et al. Repurposing of drugs: an attractive pharmacological strategy for cancer therapeutics. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;68:258–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gammella E, Maccarinelli F, Buratti P, Recalcati S, Cairo G. The role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bajpai VK, Khan I, Shukla S, Kang SM, Aziz F, Tripathi KM, et al. Multifunctional N-P-doped carbon dots for regulation of apoptosis and autophagy in B16F10 melanoma cancer cells and in vitro imaging applications. Theranostics. 2020;10(17):7841–56. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.42291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar D, Gorain M, Kundu G, Kundu GC. Therapeutic implications of cellular and molecular biology of cancer stem cells in melanoma. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-016-0578-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chin L, Garraway LA, Fisher DE. Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era. Genes Dev. 2006;20(16):2149–82. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1437206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Buch K, Peters T, Nawroth T, Sänger M, Schmidberger H, Langguth P. Determination of cell survival after irradiation via clonogenic assay versus multiple MTT assay - a comparative study. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cavalcanti Chipoline I, Carolina Carvalho da Fonseca A, Ribeiro Machado da Costa G, Pereira de Souza M, Won-Held Rabelo V, de Queiroz LN, et al. Molecular mechanism of action of new 1,4-naphthoquinones tethered to 1,2,3-1H-triazoles with cytotoxic and selective effect against oral squamous cell carcinoma. Bioorg Chem. 2020;101:103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Caro D, Rivera D, Ocampo Y, Müller K, Franco LA. A promising naphthoquinone [8-hydroxy-2-(2-thienylcarbonyl)naphtho[2,3-b]thiophene-4,9-dione] exerts anti-colorectal cancer activity through ferroptosis and inhibition of MAPK signaling pathway based on RNA sequencing. Open Chem. 2020;18(1):1242–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nikolovska K, Spillmann D, Haier J, Ladányi A, Stock C, Seidler DG. Melanoma cell adhesion and migration is modulated by the uronyl 2-O sulfotransferase. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gao Y, Zhao Z, Meng X, Chen H, Fu G. Migration and invasion in b16-f10 mouse melanoma cells are regulated by nrf2 inhibition during treatment with ionizing radiation. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(2):1959–66. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi EO, Cho EJ, Jeong JW, Park C, Hong SH, Hwang HJ, et al. Baicalein inhibits the migration and invasion of B16F10 mouse melanoma cells through inactivation of the Pi3K/Akt signaling pathway. Biomol Ther. 2017;25(2):213–21. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2016.094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ju RJ, Stehbens SJ, Haass NK. The role of melanoma cell-stroma interaction in cell motility, invasion, and metastasis. Front Med. 2018;5:307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gutiérrez-Fernández J, Kaszuba K, Minhas GS, Baradaran R, Tambalo M, Gallagher DT, et al. Key role of quinone in the mechanism of respiratory complex I. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17957-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nitiss JL. DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(5):327–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Im YS, Chung Y, Won DY, Kwon SH, Kim HR, Lee DG, et al. Apoptotic effect of naphthoquinone derivatives on HCT116 colon cancer cells. Genes Genomics. 2010;32(6):592–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-010-0145-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Majtnerová P, Roušar T. An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45(5):1469–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Koff JL, Ramachandiran S, Bernal-Mizrachi L. A time to kill: targeting apoptosis in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(2):2942–55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16022942.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tavares S, Vieira AF, Taubenberger AV, Araújo M, Martins NP, Brás-Pereira C, et al. Actin stress fiber organization promotes cell stiffening and proliferation of pre-invasive breast cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15237. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang Y, Chen X, Gueydan C, Han J. Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths. Cell Res. 2018;28(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. do Nascimento TG, Vieira PS, Cogo SC, Dias-Netipanyj MF, de França Junior N, Câmara DAD, et al. Antitumoral effects of Amblyomma sculptum Berlese saliva in neuroblastoma cell lines involve cytoskeletal deconstruction and cell cycle arrest. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2019;28(1):126–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-296120180098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oliveira KM, Liany LD, Corrêa RS, Deflon VM, Cominetti MR, Batista AA. Selective Ru(II)/lawsone complexes inhibiting tumor cell growth by apoptosis. J Inorg Biochem. 2017;176:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.08.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lahorte CMM, Vanderheyden JL, Steinmetz N, Van de Wiele C, Dierckx RA, Slegers G. Apoptosis-detecting radioligands: current state of the art and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(6):887–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1555-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Naeini MB, Bianconi V, Pirro M, Sahebkar A. The role of phosphatidylserine recognition receptors in multiple biological functions. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2020;25(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-020-00214-z.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen Q, Kang J, Fu C. The independence of and associations among apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2018;3(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0018-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work received no funds for its execution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Biology and Immunology of Cancer and Leishmania, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil

    Mariana Nobre Farias de Franca, João Henrique Oliveira Bonifacio, Edmilson Willian Propheta dos Santos, Jileno Ferreira Santos, Ricardo Scher & Cristiane Bani Corrêa

  2. Graduate program in health sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil

    Mariana Nobre Farias de Franca, Edmilson Willian Propheta dos Santos & Cristiane Bani Corrêa

  3. Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Raquel Geralda Isidório, Flaviano Melo Ottoni & Ricardo José Alves

  4. Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience of Sergipe, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil

    Waldecy de Lucca Junior

Authors
  1. Mariana Nobre Farias de Franca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raquel Geralda Isidório
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. João Henrique Oliveira Bonifacio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edmilson Willian Propheta dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jileno Ferreira Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Flaviano Melo Ottoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Waldecy de Lucca Junior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ricardo Scher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ricardo José Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Cristiane Bani Corrêa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MF and CB analyzed the experiments and were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. MF performed all the experiments with the authors. RA, FO and RI synthesized the analyzed compounds. JB participated in the execution of the cytotoxicity assays. JS contributed to the clonogenic and wound healing assays. WJ analyzed with MF the data obtained in the wound healing assay. EP and RS performed and analyzed the flow cytometry assay and translated the manuscript. All authors commented and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiane Bani Corrêa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Franca, M.N.F., Isidório, R.G., Bonifacio, J.H.O. et al. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of glycosidic derivatives of lawsone in melanoma cancer cell. BMC Cancer 21, 662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08404-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08404-4

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us