Skip to main content

Normal and cancer fibroblasts differentially regulate TWIST1, TOX and cytokine gene expression in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Abstract

Background

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) that transforms from mature, skin-homing T cells and progresses during the early stages in the skin. The role of the skin microenvironment in MF development is unclear, but recent findings in a variety of cancers have highlighted the role of stromal fibroblasts in promoting or inhibiting tumorigenesis. Stromal fibroblasts are an important part of the cutaneous tumor microenvironment (TME) in MF. Here we describe studies into the interaction of TME-fibroblasts and malignant T cells to gain insight into their role in CTCL.

Methods

Skin from normal (n = 3) and MF patients (n = 3) were analyzed for FAPα by immunohistochemistry. MyLa is a CTCL cell line that retains expression of biomarkers TWIST1 and TOX that are frequently detected in CTCL patients. MyLa cells were cultured in the presence or absence of normal or MF skin derived fibroblasts for 5 days, trypsinized to detached MyL

a cells, and gene expression analyzed by RT-PCR for MF biomarkers (TWIST1 and TOX), Th1 markers (IFNG, TBX21), Th2 markers (GATA3, IL16), and proliferation marker (MKI67). Purified fibroblasts were assayed for VIM and ACTA2 gene expression. Cellular senescence assay was performed to assess senescence.

Results

MF skin fibroblast showed increased expression of FAP-α with increasing stage compared to normal. Normal fibroblasts co-cultured with MyLa cells suppressed expression of TWIST1 (p < 0.0006), and TOX (p < 0.03), GATA3 (p < 0.02) and IL16 (p < 0.03), and increased expression of IFNG (p < 0.03) and TBX21 (p < 0.03) in MyLa cells. In contrast, MyLa cells cultured with MF fibroblasts retained high expression of TWIST1, TOX and GATA3. MF fibroblasts co-culture with MyLa cells increased expression of IL16 (p < 0.01) and IL4 (p < 0.02), and suppressed IFNG and TBX21 in MyLa cells. Furthermore, expression of MKI67 in MyLa cells was suppressed by normal fibroblasts compared to MF fibroblasts.

Conclusion

Skin fibroblasts represent important components of the TME in MF. In co-culture model, normal and MF fibroblasts have differential influence on T-cell phenotype in modulating expression of Th1 cytokine and CTCL biomarker genes to reveal distinct roles with implications in MF progression.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a heterogeneous group of T cell malignancies that develop from the proliferation and transformation of mature skin-homing T cells, the most common types include mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) [1,2,3]. MF is an indolent variant that progressively advances primarily in the skin. Skin histology of early patch MF lesions show a low tumor burden with T cell infiltration characterized by Th1 cytokine bias, with increased expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ [3,4,5,6]. In addition, Th1 chemokines such as CXC chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL 9) and CXCL10 are also expressed in lesional skin of early CTCL, when epidermotropism of tumor cells is evident [7]. SS is an aggressive variant of CTCL characterized by erythroderma, lymphadenopathy and malignant T cells circulating in the blood. SS can have eosinophilia, a high level of IgE and chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) in patients [8, 9]. MF and SS share similarities in gene expression and a subset of MF progresses to SS. Immune analysis of the skin in SS shows a Th2 cytokine profile [10] and the malignant T cells exhibit a Th2 cytokine pattern with increased IL-4 [11]. From gene profiling studies, a unique gene expression phenotype of SS has been uncovered [12]. Gene expression changes in SS, such as decreased expression of IFN-γ, and increased expression of unique biomarker genes identified in SS such as TWIST1, and TOX are frequent and represent important features of CTCL [13,14,15].

Recent studies have established that both the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the activity of tumor-infiltrating stromal cells affect cancer phenotypes [16]. The contribution of the TME to cancer prognosis was highlighted by a recent analysis of 39 malignancies that revealed that TME gene signatures are better predictors of survival than genes expressed in malignant tumor cells [17]. The TME is comprised of abundant fibroblasts and immune cells, as well as endothelial cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, which closely interact with tumor cells. Crosstalk between the TME and tumor cells can regulate cancer progression either positively or negatively. Fibroblasts have been shown to play an important role in maintaining the ECM and regulating epithelial differentiation by stromal–epithelial crosstalk to establish an invasion-permissive TME [18]. In B-cell lymphomas, fibroblasts have an inverse correlation with survival outcomes compared to carcinomas [19]. In CTCL, fibroblasts are an important component of the TME and have been shown to promote tumorigenesis by augmenting Th2 and attenuating Th1 immune responses [20]. In MF lesional skin, fibroblast-derived periostin promotes the production of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) [21]. TSLP subsequently activates immature myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) to produce the Th2-attracting cytokine CCL17 [22], suggesting that fibroblasts from CTCL may nurture a Th2-dominant TME in MF lesions through TSLP secretion. Moreover, fibroblasts contribute to the high level of exotoxin-3 in lesional skin of CTCL, which interacts with CCR3 and controls the Th2-dominant TME in CTCL [23].

A Th1 bias has been described in the skin in early MF, when malignant cells are sparse, but how this immune bias develops is unclear. A Th1 cytokine pattern in the TME may suggest the presence of anti-tumor immunity that inhibits disease progression, which is consistent with an indolent clinical course of MF seen in the majority of patients. This observation was complemented by the finding that T cell clones isolated from early MF skin lesions lack a Th2-polarized cytokine pattern [24]. The interaction of tumor T cells with fibroblasts in MF is not well studied, but normal fibroblasts have variable activities in cancer and can exert suppressive functions against tumor cells [25]. With the indolent nature of MF, one hypothesis is that an interaction between skin fibroblasts and malignant T cells influences malignant T cell growth. The underlying propensity for immune bias is illustrated when culturing benign host T cells from SS patients in vitro away from the malignant Th2 cells, which leads to an enhanced Th1 cytokine pattern [26]. These findings suggest an important role for the TME in immune bias.

To better understand the interactions between fibroblasts and neoplastic T cells in CTCL, we studied immune changes and biomarker regulation using in vitro culture of skin fibroblasts and MF cells. Here we describe one of the first studies using a novel 2-dimensional co-culture method to demonstrate the immune regulation by skin fibroblasts of CTCL cells, and investigate how fibroblasts promote changes in CTCL.

Methods

Patient samples

Patient samples were obtained under approved institutional research protocol. Fibroblasts were isolated from lesional skin from MF patients (n = 3, stage IIB & IV, Table 1), and de-identified surgical skin remnants from age-matched healthy individuals (n = 3). Skin specimens were dissociated with 0.25% collagenase I (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) in explant medium (RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA,) at room temperature for 1 h with agitation (Supplementary Fig. 1). Dissociated cells were filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and then cultured for 2 to 4 days in explant medium, and further passaged to grow sufficient fibroblasts for co-culture experiment.

Table 1 Demographic details of patients and normal donors

Cell lines

MyLa cells [28] were a kind gift provided by Dr. Michael Girardi (Yale University). HH and Hut78 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA) in April 2019. Jurkat E6–1 clone was also purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). All the cell lines were first generation expansion of original stock. Jurkat, HH and MyLa cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Hut78 cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. MyLa cells were confirmed to be negative for mycoplasma by universal mycoplasma detection kit (ATCC, Manassas, VA).

2-Dimensional co-culture model

Primary fibroblasts were co-cultured with MyLa cells as previously described [29] (Fig. 1). Briefly, normal and tumor fibroblasts (5 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded into separate 6-well plates, and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and antibiotics until ~ 70% confluence was reached. Upon ~ 70% confluence, MyLa cells (3 × 105/ml), derived from a patient with advanced MF, were added with fresh medium, and cultured with the fibroblasts for 5 days. MyLa cells were also cultured in the absence of fibroblasts as a control. After 5 days, co-cultured MyLa cells and normal/lesional fibroblasts were trypsinized and re-plated into new 6-well plates for 40 min to allow fibroblasts to adhere to the plastic, leaving MyLa cells in suspension. Separated MyLa cells along with their no-fibroblast controls were lysed for RNA extraction.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of 2-dimensional co-culture method

RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR

RNA was purified using the RNeasy Plus mini kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA using Maxima H Minus reverse transcriptase (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Real-time PCR quantification was performed with Maxima SYBR Green qPCR master mix (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), on a QuantStudio 5 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed on paraffin sections with anti-FAPα (ab207178, 1:200; abcam, Cambridge, MA). After performing heat mediated antigen retrieval with Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) for 30 min, slides were blocked with normal blocking serum for 20 min, followed by incubation with anti-FAPα antibody for 2 h after serial washing for 5 min. Assays were completed with Vectastain elite ABC peroxidase (HRP) kit (Vector laboratories, Burlington, ON) and counterstaining with haematoxylin. A Zeiss AXIO Imager.M2 microscope (Zeiss, Nashville, TN) was used to obtain images at 20x and 40x magnification with an Olympus DP73 digital camera (Olympus, Melville, NY) with 14-bit bit depth and 17.28mb pixel resolution on bright field mode. Images were taken using CellSens entry 1.17 software (Olympus, Melville, NY) at 72 dpi horizontal and vertical resolution with 2400 × 1800 dimensions. Images were further processed to 600 dpi horizontal and vertical resolution with 8000 × 4500 dimensions using Photoshop CS6 (64 bit) (Adobe, San Jose, CA).

Cellular senescence

Cellular Senescence was assessed with the cellular senescence assay kit (Cell BioLabs, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol that detects senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βGal) in cells.

Statistical analysis

Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze the quantitative RT-PCR data for mRNA expression, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. All data is the mean of three separate experiments, and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

MF lesional fibroblasts are phenotypically different from healthy skin fibroblasts

Due to previously observed effects of MF lesional skin fibroblasts on T cell polarization, we hypothesized that there are inherent phenotypic differences between fibroblasts from MF lesional skin and healthy skin. Therefore, we compared gene expression for cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) markers including MMP2 [30], MMP9 [31], MMP21 [32], TGFA [33], CXCL12 [34], ITGA3 [35], FAPα [34], and IL32 [36] in fibroblasts derived from normal skin and MF tumors. Of the genes analyzed, only IL32 and FAPα demonstrated differential expression between MF and normal fibroblasts (Fig. 2a). For FAP-α, we further compared expression by immunostaining tissue sections from normal skin and MF lesional skin. FAP-α expression was low in normal skin (Fig. 2b-c), but higher in MF lesional skin (Fig. 2d-i). Furthermore, FAP-α staining was more intense in MF stage IV lesional skin (Fig. 2h-i) compared to lesional skin from stages I-II (Fig. 2d-g). The staining of FAP-α appears to increase with stage. Thus, normal and MF fibroblasts are phenotypically different, but do not share many CAF markers with other solid tumors.

Fig. 2
figure2

Expression of IL32 and FAPα in normal and MF fibroblasts. a IL32 and FAPα gene expression in normal and MF fibroblasts by RT-PCR (NF: Normal Fibroblast; PF: Patient Fibroblast). b-e Identification of in situ and primary culture FAP-α+ CAFs in normal (n = 3) and MF (n = 3). Representative IHC images of FAP-α staining showing a strong positive CAFs in MF stage IV tissue than normal skin. Stage II (f, g) shows low to moderate FAP-α positive CAFs compared to stage I (d, e) and normal (b, c). Scale bars, 500 μm

Short-term co-culture does not affect expression of fibroblast markers

The histologic findings suggest a role of fibroblasts interacting with malignant cells in CTCL. To study interactions between fibroblasts and malignant cells in CTCL, we determined if short-term co-culture of fibroblasts with MyLa cells altered the phenotype of normal fibroblasts. We assessed for changes in fibroblast markers, mesenchyme-specific genes such as vimentin (VIM), alpha-smooth muscle actin (ACTA2) and heat-shock protein 47 (HSP47) by quantitative gene expression analysis. After co-culture with MyLa cells, these genes were observed to be unchanged in normal fibroblasts (Fig. 3a). ACTA2 is a marker for CAFs in solid tumors [37], and is associated with worse clinical outcome for several cancers including breast and lung cancers [38, 39]. In contrast to CAFs from pancreatic and colorectal carcinomas, where expression of ACTA2 is elevated [40, 41], ACTA2 expression was very similar in MF and normal fibroblasts after short-term co-culture with MyLa cells (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure3

a Expression of fibroblast markers: Fibroblasts separated after co-culture were analyzed for gene expression by RT-PCR to quantify changes in the expression of known fibroblast markers (VIM, HSP47) and a gene which is expressed by both fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts (ACTA2). b ACTA2 gene expression in normal and MF fibroblasts by RT-PCR (NF: Normal Fibroblast; PF: Patient Fibroblast). c Cellular Senescence: A colorimetric based cellular senescence assay based on quantification of the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-β-gal or SABG) was performed. Co-culture of fibroblasts with MyLa cells had no effect on fibroblast proliferation. d MF biomarker expression in cell lines: MyLa, HH and Hut78 cell lines were tested for MF biomarkers (TWIST1 and TOX). Jurkat cells were used as a control. Only MyLa cells showed expression of TWIST1 and TOX compared to Jurkat cells

In addition, we also measured cellular senescence by quantifying SA-βGal activity, and found that co-culture with MyLa cells did not induce a detectable senescence phenotype in normal fibroblasts (Fig. 3c). Therefore, short-term co-culture of MyLa cells with normal fibroblasts does not induce any change in fibroblasts in terms of phenotypic marker expression and proliferation capacity.

Normal fibroblasts alter expression of CTCL biomarkers in CTCL cells

Expression of TWIST1 and TOX is frequently increased in tumor T cells from CTCL patients [42, 43]. Therefore, we assessed the CTCL cell lines MyLa, Hut78 and HH for expression of TWIST1 and TOX. Of the three cell lines analyzed, only MyLa cells expressed these CTCL biomarker genes (Fig. 3d), indicating that abnormal gene expression similar to that seen in patient-derived T cells is preserved MyLa cells.

To study the influence of the TME in CTCL, MyLa cells were co-cultured with normal fibroblasts (n = 3) or MF lesional fibroblasts (n = 3), and changes in the expression of CTCL biomarker genes in MyLa cells were assessed. As shown in Fig. 3d, MyLa cells have endogenously high TWIST1 expression, but after co-culture with normal fibroblasts, expression of TWIST1 was significantly reduced (p < 0.0006) (Fig. 4a). TOX expression was also suppressed in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblasts (p < 0.03, Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure4

Normal fibroblasts suppresses MF biomarker expression in MyLa cells: a, b Expression of MF biomarker genes (TWIST1 and TOX) are significantly suppressed in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblast (TWIST1: p < 0.0006; TOX: p < 0.03) as measured by RT-PCR. Co-culture of MyLa cells with MF fibroblasts does not show effect on MF biomarkers gene expression. Data represented here is the mean of three (n = 3) different experiment and paired t-test has been performed to calculate the p value. c, d Normal fibroblasts promotes Th1 environment in MyLa cells: Expression of Th1 cytokine and marker genes (IFNG and TBX21) are significantly increased in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblast (IFNG: p < 0.03; TBX21: p < 0.03), whereas co-culture of MyLa cells with MF fibroblasts further suppresses Th1 cytokine and biomarker gene expression in MyLa cells

In contrast, MyLa cells co-cultured with MF lesional fibroblasts retained high expression of TWIST1, and expression of TWIST1 tended to increase (Fig. 4a). TOX remained higher when co-cultured with MF fibroblasts (Fig. 4b). As TOX plays an important role in CTCL proliferation [44] and T cell exhaustion [45], the ability of normal fibroblasts to suppress TOX expression in MyLa cells suggests that fibroblasts in the MF TME may have a role in regulating T cell exhaustion and disease progression.

Normal fibroblasts promote a Th1 phenotype in CTCL cells

TWIST1 has been shown to limit the expression of IFNG and TBX21 in Th1 cells [46]. Therefore, we examined the effect of the co-culture model on the expression of the IFNG and TBX21 gene in MyLa cells. Co-culture with normal fibroblasts increased the expression of both IFNG (p < 0.03) and TBX21 (p < 0.03, Fig. 4c-d). TBX21 encodes T-box transcription factor (T-bet), a master-regulator of Th1 differentiation [47]. Given the modulatory role of TWIST1 in Th1 differentiation [46], the increased expression of IFNG and TBX21 may be secondary to suppression of TWIST1 in MyLa cells co-cultured with normal fibroblasts. In contrast, co-culturing MyLa cells with MF tumor-derived fibroblasts significantly suppresses the expression of IFNG (p < 0.0002) and TBX21 (p < 0.0004) in MyLa cells (Fig. 4c-d). These findings suggest that normal fibroblasts promote a Th1-like transcriptional network in MyLa cells.

Normal fibroblasts attenuate Th2-bias and proliferation in the TME

Studies have shown that T-bet not only promotes Th1 differentiation, but also represses Th2 differentiation by suppressing GATA3 expression [48] and reducing the binding of GATA3 to DNA [46]. GATA3 is crucial for the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th2 cells. Furthermore, GATA3 deletion permits the development of IFN-γ producing cells [49]. Therefore, we analyzed whether GATA3 expression in MyLa cells is affected by co-culture with fibroblasts. After co-culture with normal fibroblasts, GATA3 expression was suppressed in MyLa cells (p < 0.02, Fig. 5a). In MF, GATA3 expression is increased and high expression of GATA3 was retained in MyLa cells after co-culture with MF tumor-derived fibroblasts (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure5

a Normal fibroblasts attenuates Th2 processes in MyLa cells: Expression of GATA3 is significantly suppressed in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblasts (GATA3: p < 0.02) as measured by RT-PCR, whereas co-culture of MyLa cells with MF fibroblasts does not show effect on GATA3 expression. Data represented here is the mean of three different experiment and paired t-test has been performed to calculate the p value. b, c Normal fibroblasts regulates cell growth in MyLa cells: b Expression of IL16 is significantly suppressed in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblast (p < 0.03) in a short term culture, whereas co-culture of MyLa cells with MF fibroblasts increases the expression of IL16 expression in a significant manner (p < 0.01) as measured by RT-PCR. c Expression of IL4 was suppressed in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblasts in a short term culture, whereas co-culture of MyLa cells with MF fibroblasts significantly increases the expression of IL4 expression (p < 0.02) as measured by RT-PCR. d Co-culture of MyLa cells with normal fibroblasts further suppresses MKI67 expression in MyLa cells whereas co-culture with MF fibroblasts does not show noticeable effect on MKI67 expression. Data represented here is the mean of three different experiments and paired t-test has been performed to calculate the p value

Upregulation of IL-16 in advanced CTCL can augment the growth of malignant T cells in an autocrine manner [50]. IL-16 is a potent T-cell chemoattractant and a known marker of MF onset and stage [50]. Based on the role of IL-16 as a regulator of T-cell proliferation and migration, we next examined IL16 expression in MyLa cells in co-culture experiments. After co-culture with normal fibroblasts, a significant suppression in IL16 expression was observed (p < 0.03, Fig. 5b). In contrast, co-culture with MF tumor-derived fibroblasts significantly increased IL16 expression in MyLa cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 5b). Several cytokines have been reported to support tumor growth in MF such as IL-13 [51], IL-15 [52] and IL-4 [3, 6]. We next assessed their gene expression in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal and MF fibroblasts. We did not find any significant change in the expression of IL13 and IL15 (data not shown). However, whereas IL4 expression was not significantly altered in MyLa cells after co-culture with normal fibroblasts, co-culture with MF tumor-derived fibroblasts significantly increased IL4 expression in MyLa cells (p < 0.02, Fig. 5c). Furthermore, we assessed the effect of co-culture on the proliferation marker MKI67. Interestingly, we observed reduced MKI67 expression in MyLa cells after co-culture with both MF and normal fibroblasts. This effect was only significant for MF fibroblasts (p < 0.01), despite the suppression observed with normal fibroblasts (Fig. 5d).

Discussion

Studies have shown that tumor growth is preceded or accompanied by activation of local host stroma [53], which plays a major role in disease evolution and response to therapy [54]. CAFs are stromal cells that are abundant in a variety of cancers and have diverse tumor-restraining/promoting roles [55,56,57,58]. The cutaneous TME in CTCL includes abundant stromal fibroblast, but their influence on malignant T cell is poorly characterized.

The majority of MF patients experience indolent disease limited to the skin and have an excellent prognosis unless lesions thicken and progress to tumor stage [59]. In contrast, SS is a CTCL with more aggressive and rapidly progressive disease. Early MF skin lesions are characterized by a low burden of malignant T cells accompanied by a reactive immune cell infiltrate. In addition to the immune cells, the skin ME background consists of mesenchymal stromal cells, many of which are fibroblasts [60]. Malignant T cell burden increases with progression from patch to plaque to tumor lesions in MF. Concomitant changes in the TME can be detected, such as increased angiogenesis and stromal fibroblasts expressing matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) [61]. As disease stage progresses, the skin architecture is disrupted by TME-related changes including epidermal fibrosis, increased Th2 cells and cytokines, and declining expression of Th1 factors [3, 62,63,64]. Th2-like malignant T cells proliferate in the TME in the presence of MF fibroblasts. Upregulation of CTLA-4 on the surface of malignant T cells further suppresses host immunity [65]. Highlighting the importance of this immune shift in disease progression is that restoring cytokines seen in early MF by treating advanced CTCL with IFN-α and IFN-γ is an effective strategy for treatment [66]. These observations suggest that fibroblasts in early skin lesions may contribute to the indolent nature of early MF by ameliorating disease-promoting gene expression in malignant T cells.

The current study is a first step to elucidate the regulatory role of fibroblasts in CTCL compared to normal fibroblasts. The present study focuses on the dermal fibroblasts between CTCL and normal, and specifically directed at major differences in their interaction with malignant T cells. In the development of CTCL lesions in the skin, there are no privilege sites where lesions have not been observed and in this initial report, we are focused on analyzing properties in fibroblasts that is independent of location. However future studies comparing properties of fibroblasts from different sites in the skin will be important in yielding understanding into the mechanism of progression and site predilection.

In the present study, we isolated fibroblasts from patient tissue, using established methods to elute and analyze fibroblast properties [67,68,69,70]. Here we described a novel 2-dimensional co-culture system by incubating primary fibroblasts with malignant T cells. These fibroblasts were rested in culture and were not subjected to any mechanical stress at the time of analysis. In our experiments, both normal and CTCL fibroblast were co-cultured with MyLa cells simultaneously to study disparate properties of these different fibroblast populations.

It has been observed that CAFs greatly influence the TME via the secretion of cytokines and chemokines [71, 72], regulate the plasticity of cancer stem cells [73], and play a significant role in the development of drug resistance [74]. Our findings demonstrated that MF fibroblasts have upregulated expression of IL32 and FAPα compared to normal fibroblasts (Fig. 2a). IL-32 expression has been described in keratinocytes (KCs) in lesional skin of MF patches and plaques, and in atypical T cells in the dermis in MF tumors [36]. IL-32 expression was also detected in KCs in atopic dermatitis [75]. However this study is the first to show differential IL32 expression in MF fibroblasts compared to normal fibroblasts, which resembles a recent study where IL-32 was found to be abundantly expressed in CAFs in the breast cancer TME [76]. We also showed that fibroblasts in MF differ from normal fibroblasts in the expression of FAP-α, a known CAF marker. We observe expression in MF fibroblasts that is consistent with the previous report of FAP-α in MF lesions [34]. Furthermore, the current study shows increasing expression of FAP-α in more advanced MF stages, and demonstrates for the first time that FAP-α expression can be correlated to stage (Fig. 2f-i) compared to normal donors (Fig. 2b-c).

CTCL presents with a variable clinical presentation, nevertheless there are recurrent morphologic features that can serve as clues in diagnosis and classification. We believe that the distinctive phenotype may reflect signature genes important in Sezary syndrome (SS). Indeed, from transcriptome studies of SS, a number of genes can be frequently detected to be abnormally expressed that are biomarkers [15, 77]. Therefore, we selected a number of biomarker genes to identify CTCL cell lines that are representative of SS for in vitro studies. Of the four cell lines tested (Fig. 3d), only MyLa cells expressed TWIST1, TOX and cytokine genes that are seen in primary SS cells. Based on these results, MyLa cells were chosen as a model SS cells for our experiments.

Using the novel co-culture system in this report, we describe for the first time that normal fibroblasts in co-culture can induce gene expression changes in MyLa T cells, suggesting that fibroblasts from normal skin may suppress disease-promoting gene expression in malignant T cells. Specifically, we showed that fibroblasts can modulate MyLa cells to suppress Th2 genes (Fig. 5a) and enhance Th1-related gene expression (Fig. 4d), suppress expression of the MF biomarkers TWIST1 (Fig. 4a) and TOX genes (Fig. 4b), and inhibit proliferation of MyLa cells (Fig. 5d). The results suggest that fibroblasts in early MF skin lesions may be a microenvironment that is less hospitable for proliferation. We also demonstrated that MF tumor-derived fibroblasts differ from normal fibroblasts in their ability to alter disease-associated gene expression in MyLa cells (Figs. 4a-b and 5a). In contrast to normal fiborblasts, we showed that MF fibroblasts promote expression of Th2 cytokine genes (Fig. 5b-c) and lack the ability to suppress expression of TWIST1 and TOX genes (Fig. 4a-b). Whether this is similar to CAF from solid tumors is unclear. ACTA2, which is highly expressed in carcinomas [37,38,39], is not upregulated in MF fibroblasts compared to their normal counterparts (Fig. 3b). Collectively, these results suggest that signals from normal fibroblasts may mimic the TME of early MF skin lesions, creating an environment inhospitable for proliferation.

Interestingly, these findings are reminiscent of studies on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), where the finding of stromal gene signature representing fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components associated with good survival, and creating a TME not conducive for lymphoma progression [19]. Lenz et al. identified two sets of stromal gene signatures in DLBCL patients [78]. The stromal-1 gene signature was found to be associated with better survival in DLBCL patients, which includes the genes that are associated with poor survival in other carcinomas [66]. However, the mechanism behind the suppressive effect of normal fibroblasts in CTCL is unclear, and will need further study. Our findings have implications for the understanding of tumor progression in MF in the early stages when malignant cells are sparse, when the skin architecture is preserved with the presence of normal fibroblasts, and when the immune infiltrate consists primarily of nonmalignant (reactive) Th1 cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells [3, 79]. The results we found from co-culturing normal fibroblasts with MyLa cells suggest that the Th1 immunophenotype of early stage MF skin lesions may be affected by fibroblasts that increase IFNG and TBX21 expression in T cells. Our observations indicate that MF progression is accompanied by changes in fibroblast phenotype in the TME. We show that MF fibroblasts have a modulatory effect on malignant T cells, supporting their expression of disease-associated cytokines (Fig. 5b-c) and CTCL biomarkers (Fig. 4a-b). When fibroblasts from tumor stage lesions were co-culture with MyLa cells, IL4 and IL16 expression (Fig. 5b-c) was increased, which is consistent with a malignant CTCL phenotype [3, 80]. In that setting, high levels of TWIST1 and TOX expression were maintained, in marked contrast to the significant decreases observed when MyLa cells were co-culture with normal fibroblast (Fig. 4a-b). The results from these experiments demonstrate for the first time that fibroblasts from normal skin and MF tumors differ functionally in their ability to modulate gene expression of malignant T cells.

Conclusions

In summary, our results describe novel activities of normal and MF fibroblasts to modulate gene expression in malignant T cells (Fig. 6). In this report, we focus on the transcription regulation induced by the interaction between fibroblasts and MyLa cells, and not on the function of these gene products such as GATA3 and TBX21 that are biomarkers. These novel findings suggest that the TME changes during the evolution of MF tumors, and suggest that fibroblasts in the TME play a role in disease pathogenesis and progression. Whether MF tumor fibroblasts may protect malignant T cells from cytotoxic and genotoxic therapies remains unclear. Further detailed global transcriptomic studies and functional studies such as gene silencing and blocking receptors will be needed to explore the complex interacting pathways between CTCL fibroblasts and primary CTCL cells that alters the regulation of gene expression in CTCL cells. Importantly, understanding of the mechanism important in dysregulated gene expression by skin fibroblasts may lead to the development of new strategies to discover novel compounds for the treatment of CTCL.

Fig. 6
figure6

Schematic summary of gene expression changes induced by co-culture of normal and MF fibroblasts with MyLa cells

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CTCL:

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

MF:

Mycosis fungoides

SS:

Sézary syndrome

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

VIM :

Vimentin gene

ACTA2 :

Alpha-smooth muscle actin gene

HSP47 :

Heat-shock protein 47 gene

CAFs:

Cancer-associated fibroblasts

SA-βGal:

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase

ME:

Microenvironment

DLBCL:

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

References

  1. 1.

    Kim EJ, Hess S, Richardson SK, Newton S, Showe LC, Benoit BM, et al. Immunopathogenesis and therapy of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(4):798–812. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI24826.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wong HK, Mishra A, Hake T, Porcu P. Evolving insights in the pathogenesis and therapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome). Br J Haematol. 2011;155(2):150–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08852.x.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vowels BR, Lessin SR, Cassin M, Jaworsky C, Benoit B, Wolfe JT, et al. Th2 cytokine mRNA expression in skin in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Investig Dermatol. 1994;103(5):669–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12398454.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Asadullah K, Docke WD, Haeussler A, Sterry W, Volk HD. Progression of mycosis fungoides is associated with increasing cutaneous expression of interleukin-10 mRNA. J Investig Dermatol. 1996;107(6):833–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12330869.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Asadullah K, Haeussler A, Sterry W, Docke WD, Volk HD. Interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA expression in mycosis fungoides progression. Blood. 1996;88(2):757–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V88.2.757.bloodjournal882757.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Papadavid E, Economidou J, Psarra A, Kapsimali V, Mantzana V, Antoniou C, et al. The relevance of peripheral blood T-helper 1 and 2 cytokine pattern in the evaluation of patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(4):709–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05224.x.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tensen CP, Vermeer MH, van der Stoop PM, van Beek P, Scheper RJ, Boorsma DM, et al. Epidermal interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and monokine induced by gamma-interferon (Mig) but not IL-8 mRNA expression is associated with epidermotropism in cutaneous T cell lymphomas. J Investig Dermatol. 1998;111(2):222–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00263.x.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kakinuma T, Sugaya M, Nakamura K, Kaneko F, Wakugawa M, Matsushima K, et al. Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) in mycosis fungoides: serum TARC levels reflect the disease activity of mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2003.132.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sugaya M. Chemokines and cutaneous lymphoma. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;59(2):81–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.05.005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saed G, Fivenson DP, Naidu Y, Nickoloff BJ. Mycosis fungoides exhibits a Th1-type cell-mediated cytokine profile whereas Sezary syndrome expresses a Th2-type profile. J Investig Dermatol. 1994;103(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12388985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robert C, Kupper TS. Inflammatory skin diseases, T cells, and immune surveillance. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(24):1817–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199912093412407.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moerman-Herzog A, Mehdi SJ, Wong HK. Gene expression comparison between Sezary syndrome and lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome refines biomarkers for Sezary syndrome. Cells. 2020;9(9):1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    McGirt LY, Degesys CA, Johnson VE, Zic JA, Zwerner JP, Eischen CM. TOX expression and role in CTCL. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(9):1497–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13651.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goswami M, Duvic M, Dougherty A, Ni X. Increased twist expression in advanced stage of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39(5):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2012.01883.x.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Moerman-Herzog AM, Acheampong DA, Brooks AG, Blair SM, Hsu PC, Wong HK. Transcriptome analysis of Sezary syndrome and lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome T cells reveals common and divergent genes. Oncotarget. 2019;10(49):5052–69. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Altorki NK, Markowitz GJ, Gao D, Port JL, Saxena A, Stiles B, et al. The lung microenvironment: an important regulator of tumour growth and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(1):9–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0081-9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):938–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3909.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tao L, Huang G, Song H, Chen Y, Chen L. Cancer associated fibroblasts: an essential role in the tumor microenvironment. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(3):2611–20. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6497.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Haro M, Orsulic S. A paradoxical correlation of cancer-associated fibroblasts with survival outcomes in B-cell lymphomas and carcinomas. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00098.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Miyagaki T, Sugaya M, Suga H, Morimura S, Ohmatsu H, Fujita H, et al. Low herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) expression on dermal fibroblasts contributes to a Th2-dominant microenvironment in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Investig Dermatol. 2012;132(4):1280–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.470.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Takahashi N, Sugaya M, Suga H, Oka T, Kawaguchi M, Miyagaki T, et al. Thymic stromal chemokine TSLP acts through Th2 cytokine production to induce cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2016;76(21):6241–52. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Soumelis V, Reche PA, Kanzler H, Yuan W, Edward G, Homey B, et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(7):673–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni805.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miyagaki T, Sugaya M, Fujita H, Ohmatsu H, Kakinuma T, Kadono T, et al. Eotaxins and CCR3 interaction regulates the Th2 environment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Investig Dermatol. 2010;130(9):2304–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2010.128.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Harwix S, Zachmann K, Neumann C. T-cell clones from early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma show no polarized Th-1 or Th-2 cytokine profile. Arch Dermatol Res. 2000;292(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007454.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Alkasalias T, Flaberg E, Kashuba V, Alexeyenko A, Pavlova T, Savchenko A, et al. Inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and motility by fibroblasts is both contact and soluble factor dependent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(48):17188–93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419554111.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guenova E, Watanabe R, Teague JE, Desimone JA, Jiang Y, Dowlatshahi M, et al. TH2 cytokines from malignant cells suppress TH1 responses and enforce a global TH2 bias in leukemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(14):3755–63. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3488.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Kim YH, Duvic M, Prince HM, Lessin SR, et al. Clinical end points and response criteria in mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a consensus statement of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas, the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium, and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18):2598–607.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Woetmann A, Lovato P, Eriksen KW, Krejsgaard T, Labuda T, Zhang Q, et al. Nonmalignant T cells stimulate growth of T-cell lymphoma cells in the presence of bacterial toxins. Blood. 2007;109(8):3325–32. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-04-017863.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mehdi SJ, Khan S, Ling W, Shelton RS, Epstein J, Edmonson RD, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells preconditioned with myeloma cells from high-risk patients support the growth of myeloma cells from low-risk patients. Blood. 2016;128(22):3304.

  30. 30.

    Catteau X, Simon P, Noel JC. Stromal expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 in cancer-associated fibroblasts is strongly related to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in invasive breast carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;4(3):375–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2015.721.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen C, Li WJ, Weng JJ, Chen ZJ, Wen YY, Deng T, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and lymphatic vessel density are associated with progression from adenocarcinoma in situ to invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung. Oncol Lett. 2020;20(5):130. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bister V, Skoog T, Virolainen S, Kiviluoto T, Puolakkainen P, Saarialho-Kere U. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases-21 and -26 and TIMP-4 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(11):1128–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800956.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sun J, Cui H, Gao Y, Pan Y, Zhou K, Huang J, et al. TGF-alpha overexpression in breast cancer bone metastasis and primary lesions and TGF-alpha enhancement of expression of Procancer metastasis cytokines in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6565393.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Aronovich A, Moyal L, Gorovitz B, Amitay-Laish I, Naveh HP, Forer Y, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in mycosis fungoides promote tumor cell migration and drug resistance through CXCL12/CXCR4. J Investig Dermatol. 2020;141(3):619–27.

  35. 35.

    Shirakihara T, Kawasaki T, Fukagawa A, Semba K, Sakai R, Miyazono K, et al. Identification of integrin alpha3 as a molecular marker of cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and of cancer cells with aggressive phenotypes. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1189–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12220.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Suga H, Sugaya M, Miyagaki T, Kawaguchi M, Fujita H, Asano Y, et al. The role of IL-32 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Investig Dermatol. 2014;134(5):1428–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.488.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lazard D, Sastre X, Frid MG, Glukhova MA, Thiery JP, Koteliansky VE. Expression of smooth muscle-specific proteins in myoepithelium and stromal myofibroblasts of normal and malignant human breast tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(3):999–1003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.3.999.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yamashita M, Ogawa T, Zhang X, Hanamura N, Kashikura Y, Takamura M, et al. Role of stromal myofibroblasts in invasive breast cancer: stromal expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin correlates with worse clinical outcome. Breast Cancer. 2012;19(2):170–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0234-5.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lee HW, Park YM, Lee SJ, Cho HJ, Kim DH, Lee JI, et al. Alpha-smooth muscle actin (ACTA2) is required for metastatic potential of human lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(21):5879–89. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1181.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tsujino T, Seshimo I, Yamamoto H, Ngan CY, Ezumi K, Takemasa I, et al. Stromal myofibroblasts predict disease recurrence for colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(7):2082–90. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2191.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sinn M, Denkert C, Striefler JK, Pelzer U, Stieler JM, Bahra M, et al. alpha-Smooth muscle actin expression and desmoplastic stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer: results from the CONKO-001 study. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(10):1917–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.495.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Doorn R, Dijkman R, Vermeer MH, Out-Luiting JJ, van der Raaij-Helmer EM, Willemze R, et al. Aberrant expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor EphA4 and the transcription factor twist in Sezary syndrome identified by gene expression analysis. Cancer Res. 2004;64(16):5578–86. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1253.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Huang Y, Litvinov IV, Wang Y, Su MW, Tu P, Jiang X, et al. Thymocyte selection-associated high mobility group box gene (TOX) is aberrantly over-expressed in mycosis fungoides and correlates with poor prognosis. Oncotarget. 2014;5(12):4418–25. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2031.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Huang Y, Su MW, Jiang X, Zhou Y. Evidence of an oncogenic role of aberrant TOX activation in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2015;125(9):1435–43. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-571778.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khan O, Giles JR, McDonald S, Manne S, Ngiow SF, Patel KP, et al. TOX transcriptionally and epigenetically programs CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. Nature. 2019;571(7764):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1325-x.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pham D, Vincentz JW, Firulli AB, Kaplan MH. Twist1 regulates Ifng expression in Th1 cells by interfering with Runx3 function. J Immunol. 2012;189(2):832–40. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200854.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell. 2000;100(6):655–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80702-3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Usui T, Preiss JC, Kanno Y, Yao ZJ, Bream JH, O'Shea JJ, et al. T-bet regulates Th1 responses through essential effects on GATA-3 function rather than on IFNG gene acetylation and transcription. J Exp Med. 2006;203(3):755–66. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20052165.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yagi R, Junttila IS, Wei G, Urban JF Jr, Zhao K, Paul WE, et al. The transcription factor GATA3 actively represses RUNX3 protein-regulated production of interferon-gamma. Immunity. 2010;32(4):507–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Asadullah K, Haeussler-Quade A, Gellrich S, Hanneken S, Hansen-Hagge TE, Docke WD, et al. IL-15 and IL-16 overexpression in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: stage-dependent increase in mycosis fungoides progression. Exp Dermatol. 2000;9(4):248–51. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009004248.x.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Geskin LJ, Viragova S, Stolz DB, Fuschiotti P. Interleukin-13 is overexpressed in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cells and regulates their proliferation. Blood. 2015;125(18):2798–805. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-07-590398.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Dobbeling U, Dummer R, Laine E, Potoczna N, Qin JZ, Burg G. Interleukin-15 is an autocrine/paracrine viability factor for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cells. Blood. 1998;92(1):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V92.1.252.413k08_252_258.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kalluri R. Basement membranes: structure, assembly and role in tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(6):422–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1094.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(5):392–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1877.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Fiori ME, Di Franco S, Villanova L, Bianca P, Stassi G, De Maria R. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as abettors of tumor progression at the crossroads of EMT and therapy resistance. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0994-2.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ozdemir BC, Pentcheva-Hoang T, Carstens JL, Zheng X, Wu CC, Simpson TR, et al. Depletion of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis induces immunosuppression and accelerates pancreas cancer with reduced survival. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(6):719–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.005.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rhim AD, Oberstein PE, Thomas DH, Mirek ET, Palermo CF, Sastra SA, et al. Stromal elements act to restrain, rather than support, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(6):735–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.021.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mizutani Y, Kobayashi H, Iida T, Asai N, Masamune A, Hara A, et al. Meflin-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts inhibit pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2019;79(20):5367–81. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0454.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Agar NS, Wedgeworth E, Crichton S, Mitchell TJ, Cox M, Ferreira S, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome: validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4730–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.7665.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bradford PT, Devesa SS, Anderson WF, Toro JR. Cutaneous lymphoma incidence patterns in the United States: a population-based study of 3884 cases. Blood. 2009;113(21):5064–73. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-10-184168.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Vacca A, Moretti S, Ribatti D, Pellegrino A, Pimpinelli N, Bianchi B, et al. Progression of mycosis fungoides is associated with changes in angiogenesis and expression of the matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(10):1685–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00186-X.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hsi AC, Lee SJ, Rosman IS, Carson KR, Kelley A, Viele V, et al. Expression of helper T cell master regulators in inflammatory dermatoses and primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: diagnostic implications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(1):159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.09.022.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hahtola S, Tuomela S, Elo L, Hakkinen T, Karenko L, Nedoszytko B, et al. Th1 response and cytotoxicity genes are down-regulated in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(16):4812–21. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0532.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Netchiporouk E, Litvinov IV, Moreau L, Gilbert M, Sasseville D, Duvic M. Deregulation in STAT signaling is important for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) pathogenesis and cancer progression. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(21):3331–5. https://doi.org/10.4161/15384101.2014.965061.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wong HK, Wilson AJ, Gibson HM, Hafner MS, Hedgcock CJ, Berger CL, et al. Increased expression of CTLA-4 in malignant T-cells from patients with mycosis fungoides -- cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Investig Dermatol. 2006;126(1):212–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700029.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Spaccarelli N, Rook AH. The use of interferons in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33(4):731–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2015.05.008.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kisiel MA, Klar AS. Isolation and culture of human dermal fibroblasts. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1993:71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Phan QM, Sinha S, Biernaskie J, Driskell RR. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of small and large wounds reveals the distinct spatial organization of regenerative fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(1):92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.14244.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Vangipuram M, Ting D, Kim S, Diaz R, Schule B. Skin punch biopsy explant culture for derivation of primary human fibroblasts. J Vis Exp. 2013;(77):e3779. https://doi.org/10.3791/3779.

  70. 70.

    Rittie L, Fisher GJ. Isolation and culture of skin fibroblasts. Methods Mol Med. 2005;117:83–98. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-940-0:083.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Guo X, Oshima H, Kitmura T, Taketo MM, Oshima M. Stromal fibroblasts activated by tumor cells promote angiogenesis in mouse gastric cancer. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(28):19864–71. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800798200.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kojima Y, Acar A, Eaton EN, Mellody KT, Scheel C, Ben-Porath I, et al. Autocrine TGF-beta and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) signaling drives the evolution of tumor-promoting mammary stromal myofibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(46):20009–14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013805107.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lau EY, Lo J, Cheng BY, Ma MK, Lee JM, Ng JK, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts regulate tumor-initiating cell plasticity in hepatocellular carcinoma through c-met/FRA1/HEY1 signaling. Cell Rep. 2016;15(6):1175–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.019.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Su S, Chen J, Yao H, Liu J, Yu S, Lao L, et al. CD10(+)GPR77(+) cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness. Cell. 2018;172(4):841–56.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.009.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Meyer N, Zimmermann M, Burgler S, Bassin C, Woehrl S, Moritz K, et al. IL-32 is expressed by human primary keratinocytes and modulates keratinocyte apoptosis in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(4):858–65.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.01.016.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wen S, Hou Y, Fu L, Xi L, Yang D, Zhao M, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)-derived IL32 promotes breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis via integrin beta3-p38 MAPK signalling. Cancer Lett. 2019;442:320–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.015.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Wong HK, Gibson H, Hake T, Geyer S, Frederickson J, Marcucci G, et al. Promoter-specific hypomethylation is associated with overexpression of PLS3, GATA6, and TWIST1 in the Sezary syndrome. J Investig Dermatol. 2015;135(8):2084–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.116.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lenz G, Wright G, Dave SS, Xiao W, Powell J, Zhao H, et al. Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2313–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802885.

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Linnemann T, Tumenjargal S, Gellrich S, Wiesmuller K, Kaltoft K, Sterry W, et al. Mimotopes for tumor-specific T lymphocytes in human cancer determined with combinatorial peptide libraries. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(1):156–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200101)31:1<156::AID-IMMU156>3.0.CO;2-P.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lee BN, Duvic M, Tang CK, Bueso-Ramos C, Estrov Z, Reuben JM. Dysregulated synthesis of intracellular type 1 and type 2 cytokines by T cells of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.1.79-84.1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the UAMS Department of Dermatology and volunteers.

Funding

This work was partially supported by Translational Research Institute Special Populations Pilot Award to HKW (NCATS UL1TR003107). SJM and AMH were funded to conduct the research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception, design and analysis: SJM and HKW; manuscript preparation: SJM, AMH and HKW; sample collection: SJM and AMH. HKW supervised all aspects of the research. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry K. Wong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted under a human research protocol #204503 approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS, Little Rock, AR). All participants voluntarily provided written informed consent. All the cell lines used in the study was approved by our institutional biosafety protocol (BP#161).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehdi, S.J., Moerman-Herzog, A. & Wong, H.K. Normal and cancer fibroblasts differentially regulate TWIST1, TOX and cytokine gene expression in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. BMC Cancer 21, 492 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08142-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
  • Mycosis fungoides
  • Tumor microenvironment
  • Fibroblasts
  • Biomarkers