Skip to main content
Download PDF
/v1/supplement/title

Association between high-resolution MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion and tumour microcirculation estimated by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in rectal cancer: preliminary results

BMC Cancer volume 19, Article number: 498 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) status is associated with quantitative perfusion parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in rectal cancer.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery alone within 2 weeks following rectal MRI were enrolled in this retrospective study. mrEMVI status was determined based on high-resolution MRI. The quantitative perfusion parameters (Ktrans, kep and ve) derived from DCE-MRI were calculated from all sections containing tumours. DCE-MRI parameters and clinicopathological variables in patients with different mrEMVI statuses were compared.

Results

For patients who were mrEMVI positive, the tumours demonstrated significantly lower kep values (P = 0.012) and higher ve values (P = 0.021) than tumours of patients who were mrEMVI negative, while the Ktrans value displayed no significant difference (P = 0.390). The patients who were mrEMVI positive had larger tumour size, higher pathological tumour stage and increased regional nodal metastases compared to those who were mrEMVI negative (2.9 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P = 0.011; 63.8% vs. 92.0%, P = 0.010; 36.2% vs. 76.0%, P = 0.001; respectively).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated for the first time that tumour microcirculation is altered in mrEMVI-positive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, as evidenced by significantly lower kep and higher ve values. In addition, these patients were more likely to have a larger tumour size, a higher pathological tumour stage and regional nodal metastases than mrEMVI-negative patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), defined histologically as the presence of tumour cells within blood vessels outside the muscularis propria of the rectal wall, is associated with a higher risk of local and distant recurrence and poorer survival [1, 2]. Although dissemination of tumour cells into small vessels (< 3 mm in diameter) can be histologically confirmed, this identification is of little clinical importance [2, 3]. In addition, when involved vessels are extensively destroyed beyond recognition, they are underreported by pathologists [4]. Furthermore, the reported detection rates of EMVI vary widely due to heterogeneity in staining, the extent of histopathological evaluation or diagnostic criteria for EMVI [1, 4, 5]. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), generally consisting of thin sections (3 mm) with an in-plane resolution of 0.5–0.8 mm, is the primary imaging modality for preoperative local staging of rectal cancer [6]. This method has shown accuracy in identifying EMVI, especially in vessels greater than 3 mm in diameter [3, 7, 8]. In addition, several studies have suggested that MRI-detected EMVI (mrEMVI) is a strongly predictive of poor prognosis [9, 10]. Therefore, the identification of EMVI based on high-resolution MRI can be regarded as more clinically relevant than histological identification.

Tumour angiogenesis, which is regulated by numerous factors, is a fundamental process in the growth and invasion of rectal cancer [11]. Among the most critical regulator of angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [12]. Microvessel density (MVD), which is a measurement of the density of microvessels, has been found to be correlated with VEGF expression, and both of these immunohistochemical markers are widely used to evaluate tumour angiogenesis [13, 14]. Immunohistochemistry is invasive, time consuming and has poor measurement repeatability, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is a promising method to noninvasively evaluate tumour microcirculation in vivo. Kinetic parameters estimated from DCE-MRI are able to assess tumour blood flow, capillary permeability and permeability surface area, which may reflect tumour biology. The three principle parameters are the volume transfer constant between blood plasma and extravascular extracellular space (EES) (Ktrans, min− 1), the rate constant between EES and blood plasma (kep, min− 1) and the volume of EES per unit volume of tissue (ve, 0 < ve < 1) [15].

Neovascularization usually has an immature vascular structure that can be easily infiltrated by tumour cells [16, 17]. However, the relationship between EMVI status and tumour microcirculation in patients with rectal cancer has not been studied previously. Hence, this study aims to investigate whether patients with different mrEMVI statuses show any difference in DCE-MRI parameters (Ktrans, kep and ve), with the ultimate aim of identifying a potential relationship between mrEMVI status and tumour microcirculation.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective study was conducted from November 2014 to December 2015 after approval by our institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Patients with histologically proven primary rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery (R0) for rectal cancer (including anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection) within 2 weeks after rectal high-resolution MRI and DCE-MRI were enrolled. A total of 120 consecutive patients with proven rectal cancer had preoperative rectal MRI. Among them, 48 patients were excluded for the following reasons: proven special histopathological type, including mucous adenocarcinoma (n = 3) and signet ring cell carcinoma (n = 3); receiving preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (n = 26); did not undergo surgery (n = 6); no rectal DCE-MRI (n = 6); and poor quality MR images (n = 4). Ultimately, 72 patients (41 males and 31 females; mean age, 60 ± 10 years) were included (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the study patients

Full size image

MRI examination

An appropriate amount (20–80 mL) of ultrasonic gel was administered in the rectum, except for patients with low or large rectal tumours. To reduce bowel peristalsis, 20 mg of raceanisodamine hydrochloride was injected intramuscularly approximately 10 min before the MRI. In addition, the patients were asked to urinate to prevent the effects of urine inside the bladder on DCE-MRI data postprocessing.

Imaging was performed using a 3.0-Tesla MR scanner (Magnetom Verio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 6-element body phased-array coil. The coil centre was placed at the level of the pubic symphysis and adjusted according to the tumour location. All of the patients were placed in the supine position with a feet-first orientation.

The MRI protocols included the following: (a) sagittal, coronal and oblique axial high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) using a turbo spin-echo sequence with the oblique axial plane perpendicular to the tumour basement and (b) oblique axial DCE-MRI using a three-dimensional dynamic T1-weighted sequence based on a time-resolved technique with interleaved stochastic trajectories (TWIST). After five precontrast phases, DCE-MRI was simultaneously initiated at the time of an intravenous bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine at a rate of 3.0 mL/s with a power injector, followed by a 25 mL saline flush. A total of 75 consecutive dynamic images with a temporal resolution of 4.25 s were acquired. In addition, a volume-interpolated body examination (VIBE) sequence with a dual-flip-angle was acquired to perform T1 mapping in an oblique axial plane before contrast agent administration. The detailed parameters of the protocols are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 MRI protocols for rectal cancer
Full size table

Imaging analysis

mrEMVI detection

Two radiologists specialized in rectal MRI with 6 and 8 years of experience independently reviewed high-resolution T2WI for the presence of mrEMVI. Both radiologists were blinded to the DCE-MRI results and histopathological findings. Imaging findings suggestive of mrEMVI were serpiginous extension of tumour signal into extramural vessels contiguous with or separated from the primary rectal tumour that resulted in expansion and/or irregularity of these vessels [3, 18]. Discrepant diagnoses were resolved by a third radiologist with 23 years of experience of rectal MRI for a consensus or majoritarian decision.

DCE-MRI data postprocessing

At one-month intervals, DCE-MRI data were independently postprocessed by the same two radiologists (with 6 and 8 years of experience of rectal MRI) on an MRI workstation (Syngo MultiModality Workplace, VE40A, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using Tissue 4D software. First, the T1 mapping was registered to the motion-corrected DCE-MRI images. Second, a volume of interest (VOI) was manually drawn on DCE-MRI, and the VOI was kept away from bladder. To calculate the parametric map of Ktrans in the VOI, an arterial input function (AIF) with the smallest chi-square value was selected. Third, regions of interest (ROIs) were manually contoured along the edges of the tumours on all slices containing tumour on DCE-MRI guided by corresponding oblique axial high-resolution T2WI. Lastly, the ROIs were copied to Ktrans map, and the mean quantitative perfusion parameters (Ktrans, kep and ve) were generated from a Tofts two-compartment model [15] (Figs. 2 and 3). The parameters were averaged to calculate the mean values of the whole tumour volume, and the parameters were averaged between the two radiologists for further analyses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A patient with rectal adenocarcinoma (pT3N1, moderately differentiated). a Oblique axial high-resolution T2WI depicted the extramural vessels were in the vicinity of stranding rectal tumour, but these vessels had normal calibre, and there is no definite tumour signal within the vessels (arrow), indicating mrEMVI-negative status. b A VOI (pink dashed line) was selected on DCE-MRI, and (c) the AIF with the smallest chi-square value was than selected. b The ROI (red continuous line) was drawn along the edge of the tumour guided by corresponding (a) oblique axial high-resolution T2WI. d The ROI was copied to Ktrans map, and the mean Ktrans (0.234 min− 1), kep (1.473 min− 1) and ve (0.232) values were obtained

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

A patient with rectal adenocarcinoma (pT4N1, moderately differentiated). a Sagittal high-resolution T2WI depicted definitive tumour signal within a marked expanded and irregular extramural vessel (arrow), confirming mrEMVI-positive status. c A VOI (pink dashed line) was selected on DCE-MRI, and (d) the AIF with the smallest chi-square value was the selected. c An ROI (red continuous line) was drawn along the edge of the tumour guided by corresponding (b) oblique axial high-resolution T2WI. e The ROI was copied to Ktrans map, and the mean Ktrans (0.121 min− 1), kep (0.514 min− 1) and ve (0.258) values were obtained

Full size image

Histopathological and synchronous distant metastasis assessment

The haematoxylin and eosin stained slides from all resected specimens were assessed to confirm the tumour and node stage and tumour differentiation. When the tumour was limited within muscularis propria, the stage was categorized as T1/T2; when the tumour had invaded through the muscularis propria into the perirectal tissue, the stage was categorized as T3/T4. All of the lymph nodes were analysed, and malignancy was defined when tumour cells were observed within the node under a light microscope. The histopathological stage of rectal cancer was determined according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM manual [19].

Distant metastatic lesions detected at the initial diagnostic workup and within a 6-month follow-up after the initial diagnosis were considered synchronous distant metastases. When distant metastases were suspected on initial contrast-enhanced abdominal-pelvic and chest computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced liver MRI or fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) were used for more precise evaluation. The distant metastatic lesions were confirmed by histopathology or by sequential 6-month radiologic follow-up.

Statistical analysis

A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was conducted to evaluate the data distribution. Normally distributed data were expressed as the means with standard deviations (SDs), while non-normally distributed data were reported as medians with ranges. Normally distributed data were analysed using independent samples t-test, while non-normally distributed data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were compared with χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The above statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 20.0).

Interobserver agreement for mrEMVI status evaluation between the two radiologists was analysed using Kappa statistics (0.00–0.20 poor, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1.00 excellent agreement) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) [20]. Interobserver agreement for DCE-MRI quantitative perfusion parameters measurements between the two radiologists was analysed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.00–0.20 poor, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1.00 excellent correlation) with a 95% CI and according to the method of Bland and Altman [21]. The above statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc software (version 15.8).

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

The median duration between MRI and curative resection was 5 days (range: 1–14 days). Table 2 summarizes the clinicopathological characteristics of the 72 enrolled patients. Among the 72 patients, mrEMVI was observed in 25 patients (34.7%).

Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics and comparison of clinicopathological characteristics with mrEMVI status
Full size table

The tumour size was significantly larger in mrEMVI-positive group (2.9 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P = 0.011). Higher pathological tumour stage (T3–4) was significantly more frequent in the mrEMVI-positive group (63.8% vs. 92.0%, P = 0.010). mrEMVI-positive status was associated with increased regional nodal metastases when compared with mrEMVI-negative status (36.2% vs. 76.0%, P = 0.001).

There was no significant difference in tumour location, differentiation or synchronous distant metastasis between different mrEMVI statuses (P = 0.355, 0.234 and 0.426, respectively). Among 56 patients with at least 6-month follow-up after the initial diagnosis, distant metastases to liver (3 patients) and lung (1 patient) were noted at the initial diagnostic workup, and one patient newly developed distant lymph node metastases within the 6-month follow-up.

mrEMVI status compared with DCE-MRI parameters

There was no significant difference between mrEMVI-negative and -positive patients regarding Ktrans values (P = 0.390). However, the kep values in the mrEMVI-positive group (0.710 ± 0.337 min− 1) were significantly lower than those in the mrEMVI-negative group (0.938 ± 0.364 min− 1) (P = 0.012). The ve values in the mrEMVI-positive group (0.344 ± 0.101) were significantly higher than those in the mrEMVI-negative group (0.288 ± 0.094) (P = 0.021) (Table 3, Fig. 4).

Table 3 DCE-MRI parameters in patients with different mrEMVI statuses
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Boxplots showed the relationships between mrEMVI status and kep (a) and ve (b) values. Lower kep values were noted among mrEMVI-positive patients than in mrEMVI-negative patients, while ve values in the mrEMVI-positive group were significantly higher than those in the mrEMVI-negative group

Full size image

Interobserver agreement

There were nine discrepant cases for mrEMVI status evaluation between the two radiologists. The interobserver agreement for mrEMVI status evaluation between the two radiologists was good (k = 0.74, [95% CI: 0.58–0.90]).

Interobserver reproducibility was excellent for Ktrans, kep and ve values measurements (ICC = 0.97, [95% CI: 0.96–0.98], 0.86, [95% CI: 0.78–0.91] and 0.95, [95% CI: 0.92–0.97], respectively). Figure 5 displays the Bland-Altman plots for the DCE-MRI quantitative perfusion parameters measurements.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Bland-Altman plots for interobserver reproducibility for whole tumour volume DCE-MRI quantitative perfusion parameters measurements. Bland-Altman plots of the mean Ktrans (a), kep (b) and ve (c) values of the two radiologists (x-axis) against the difference between the two radiologists (y-axis). The red continuous line represents the equality (difference = 0); the black continuous line represents the average difference (bias) between the two radiologists; the green continuous lines represent the 95% CI of the average difference; the black dashed lines represent the limits of agreement; the blue continuous lines represent the 95% CI of limits of agreement

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we evaluated the association between mrEMVI status and tumour microcirculation in rectal adenocarcinoma. No significant difference was found in the DCE-MRI parameter Ktrans between mrEMVI-negative and mrEMVI-positive patients, whereas the DCE-MRI parameters kep and ve were revealed to be associated with mrEMVI status. It is interesting to note that mrEMVI-positive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma had significantly lower kep and higher ve values than mrEMVI-negative patients.

It is now well established that angiogenesis is essential for tumour growth, invasion and lymphatic and haematogenous spread of tumour cells [11]. Newly formed capillaries are characterized by tortuous architecture and increased permeability compared with mature vessels; thus, they can be easily penetrated by tumour cells [16, 17]. mrEMVI, which is associated with a worse outcome, is an imaging indicator of tumour progression [10, 22]. In terms of biological explanations, we propose that tumour cells within intratumoural vessels, with further development, may extend into vessels outside the rectal wall to form EMVI [10, 23]. Thus, it can be presumed that the invasive degree of neovascularization is significantly different between mrEMVI-negative and mrEMVI-positive patients and that this alteration induces differences in the microcirculatory environment in tumour tissues. Quantitative perfusion parameters from DCE-MRI, a functional imaging method, provide information regarding related pathophysiological properties in vivo. Notably, mrEMVI-positive patients had significantly lower kep values. The kep value equals the flux rate of contrast agent from the EES to plasma, which depends largely on capillary permeability and the permeability surface area [15]. Based on the above hypothesis, the presence of a considerable number of tumour cells within the tumour vessels decreases the permeability surface area and thereby decreases the kep value in mrEMVI-positive patients. Clearly, a cluster of invasive tumour cells might cause decreased blood supply in the corresponding area due to a reduced permeability surface area, leading to an increased degree of tissue hypoxia and microscopic necrosis and, thus, an enlarged EES. The ve value represents the fractional volume of the EES, which is affected by the integrated effects of cell proliferation and necrosis [24]. Thus, it was not unexpected that the ve value was significantly higher in mrEMVI-positive patients. Yeo et al. [25] also demonstrated that microscopic internal necrotic areas showed a decreased kep value. In addition, it has been shown that the loss of function of cell-cell adhesion molecules, a pivotal step in tumour progression, leads to a larger interstitial space, which is reflected by a higher ve value [26, 27].

The Ktrans value represents the transfer rate from plasma to the EES, which has a mixed microcirculatory blood flow and permeability weighting [15, 28]. Although a mixed situation occurs most commonly, there is an overall trend of a dominating effect of flow in untreated tumours [29]. Theoretically, a cluster of tumour cells within vessels would decrease the local microcirculatory blood flow. In this study, as expected, there was a tendency towards a lower Ktrans value in the mrEMVI-positive group, but the trend was nonsignificant. A possible explanation for this might be that the Ktrans value is also impacted by blood perfusion, including cardiac output, hypertension and the circulatory system of an individual, which thus produces greater individual variation than other quantitative parameters. By comparison, kep is only influenced by the contrast concentration and fractional volumes in the tumour EES and might more accurately mirror the capillary permeability [30]. The results might also be limited by the complexity of the underlying pathophysiology.

A recent study also showed that primary rectal cancer blood flow measured by DCE-MRI was significantly lower in patients with metastatic nodes, which also represents an unfavourable prognosis [28]. However, regarding the investigation by Yu et al. [26], lymphovascular invasion was correlated with higher Ktrans, kep and ve values. This inconsistency may be because lymphovascular invasion may be a different entity from EMVI. In addition, quantitative perfusion parameters from DCE-MRI primarily characterize angiogenesis rather than lymphangiogenesis. Furthermore, tumour development is a complex and heterogeneous process [31]. In addition, the inconsistency of DCE-MRI protocols could also affect the results to some extent.

mrEMVI is more likely to occur with more locally advanced tumours in rectal cancer [32]. Thus, it is not surprising that larger tumour size, higher pathological tumour stage and increased metastatic regional nodes were more common in mrEMVI-positive patients. Although nodal status is vital for prognosis and treatment decision-making in rectal cancer, all kinds of imaging methods have low discriminant accuracy for nodal metastases [33]. Therefore, from a practical perspective, the presence of mrEMVI can alert radiologists to carefully scrutinize the MRI for evidence of nodal involvement. However, our study has shown that mrEMVI status was not significantly associated with synchronous distant metastasis in rectal cancer. This outcome was contrary to that of Sohn et al. [22] who found that mrEMVI was an independent significant risk factor for synchronous distant metastasis in rectal cancer. A possible explanation for this might be differences in the patient populations of the two studies. Patients who underwent curative surgery with or without neoadjuvant treatment and only underwent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were enrolled in their study; however, we only enrolled patients who proceeded directly to surgery. The patients who underwent surgery only have a low likelihood of synchronous distant metastasis, potentially influencing the relationship between mrEMVI status and synchronous distant metastasis.

Our study is hindered by a few limitations. First, mrEMVI was not directly compared with histopathology results. However, the reported incidence of EMVI on histopathology is variable, impairing the prognostic predictive value of EMVI. Although tumour deposits within small vessels are still beyond the spatial resolution of current MRI techniques [8], patients with histologically confirmed EMVI involving small vessels are the same as those with no demonstrable vascular invasion, with fewer clinical implications [22, 34]. Second, not every patient in this study underwent contrast-enhanced liver MRI or FDG-PET/CT, and it is possible that some synchronous distant metastases were missed. Lastly, the relatively small sample size did not allow for substratification of outcomes based on mrEMVI scores and different histopathological types of rectal cancer.

Conclusions

This preliminary study suggests that the microcirculation of rectal adenocarcinoma in mrEMVI-positive patients is altered, with significantly lower kep and higher ve values, enabling DCE-MRI parameters to serve as an additional tool for potentially predicting prognosis for mrEMVI-positive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. In addition, larger tumour size, higher pathological tumour stage and metastatic regional nodes were more common in mrEMVI-positive patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AIF:

Arterial input function

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

DCE-MRI:

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

EES:

Extravascular extracellular space

EMVI:

Extramural vascular invasion

FDG-PET/CT:

Fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography

FOV:

Field of view

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

k ep :

Rate constant between EES and blood plasma

K trans :

Volume transfer constant between blood plasma and EES

mrEMVI:

MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MVD:

Microvessel density

ROI:

Region of interest

SD:

Standard deviation

T2WI:

T2-weighted imaging

TE:

Echo time

TR:

Repetition time

TWIST:

Time-resolved technique with interleaved stochastic trajectories

v e :

Volume of EES per unit volume of tissue

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VIBE:

Volume-interpolated body examination

VOI:

Volume of interest

References

  1. Betge J, Pollheimer MJ, Lindtner RA, Kornprat P, Schlemmer A, Rehak P, Vieth M, Hoefler G, Langner C. Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 2012;118(3):628–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. BRIT J SURG. 1980;67(6):439–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith NJ, Barbachano Y, Norman AR, Swift RI, Abulafi AM, Brown G. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):229–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirsch R, Messenger DE, Riddell RH, Pollett A, Cook M, Al-Haddad S, Streutker CJ, Divaris DX, Pandit R, Newell KJ, et al. Venous invasion in colorectal Cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(2):200–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chand M, Palmer T, Blomqvist L, Nagtegaal I, West N, Brown G. Evidence for radiological and histopathological prognostic importance of detecting extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: recommendations for radiology and histopathology reporting. Color Dis. 2015;17(6):468–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, Rauch GM, Jensen CT, Hou P, Chang GJ, Skibber JM, Ernst RD. MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal Cancer: practical considerations. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H, Thipphavong S, Assarzadegan N, Menezes RJ, Kennedy ED, Kirsch R. MRI detection of extramural venous invasion in rectal Cancer: correlation with histopathology using elastin stain. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(4):747–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koh DM, Smith NJ, Swift RI, Brown G. The relationship between MR demonstration of extramural venous invasion and nodal disease in rectal Cancer. Clin Med Oncol. 2008;2(2):267–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chand M, Siddiqui MR, Swift I, Brown G. Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(4):1721–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YC, Kim JK, Kim M, Lee JH, Kim YB, Shin SJ. Feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion in predicting early distant metastasis in patients with stage T3 rectal cancer based on rectal MRI. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(2):297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi HJ, Hyun MS, Jung GJ, Kim SS, Hong SH. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in colorectal carcinoma with special reference to mode of metastasis and recurrence. Oncology. 1998;55(6):575–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bikfalvi A. Chapter 3 - angiogenesis and invasion in cancer. In: Aminoff MJ, Boller F, Swaab DF, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 104. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. p. 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi Y, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, Cleary KR, Ellis LM. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55(18):3964.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomoda M, Maehara Y, Kakeji Y, Ohno S, Ichiyoshi Y, Sugimachi K. Intratumoral neovascularization and growth pattern in early gastric carcinoma. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 1999;85(11):2340–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HBW, Lee T, Mayr NA, Parker GJM, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced t1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blood CH, Zetter BR. Tumor interactions with the vasculature: angiogenesis and tumor metastasis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer. 1990;1032(1):89–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Toi M, Martin L, Mcculloch P, Pezzella F, Viale G, Weidner N, Harris AL, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32(14):2474–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith NJ, Shihab O, Arnaout A, Swift RI, Brown G. MRI for detection of extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(5):1517–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American joint committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sohn B, Lim J, Kim H, Myoung S, Choi J, Kim NK, Kim M. MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor for synchronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(5):1347–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH. Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(6):448–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Plotkin A, Trachtenberg J, Wilson BC, Haider MA. Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, Ktrans, ve, and corresponding histologic features. Radiology. 2010;255(2):485–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeo D, Oh SN, Jung C, Lee MA, Oh ST, Rha SE, Jung SE, Byun JY, Gall P, Son Y. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters with angiogenesis and biologic aggressiveness of rectal cancer: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(2):474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu J, Xu Q, Huang D, Song J, Li Y, Xu L, Shi H. Prognostic aspects of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in synchronous distant metastatic rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):1840–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herzig M, Savarese F, Novatchkova M, Semb H, Christofori G. Tumor progression induced by the loss of E-cadherin independent of beta-catenin/Tcf-mediated Wnt signaling. Oncogene. 2007;26(16):2290–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grøvik E, Redalen KR, Storås TH, Negård A, Holmedal SH, Ree AH, Meltzer S, Bjørnerud A, Gjesdal K. Dynamic multi-echo DCE- and DSC-MRI in rectal cancer: low primary tumor Ktrans and ΔR2* peak are significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(1):194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jain RK, Duda DG, Clark JW, Loeffler JS. Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3(1):24–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Koo HR, Cho N, Song IC, Kim H, Chang JM, Yi A, Yun BL, Moon WK. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(1):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holash J, Wiegand SJ, Yancopoulos GD. New model of tumor angiogenesis: dynamic balance between vessel regression and growth mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. Oncogene. 1999;18(38):5356–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomson E, Scott N, Tolan D. Re: the prognostic significance of MRI-detected extramural venous invasion in rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(1):111–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(4):1465–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton M, Hughes AO, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. Invasion of veins by carcinoma of rectum: method of detection, histological features and significance. Histopathology. 1981;5(2):141–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (grant number 2014A020212126). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yan Chen and Xinyue Yang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Yan Chen, Ziqiang Wen, Yiyan Liu, Baolan Lu & Shenping Yu

  2. Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China

    Xinyue Yang

  3. Department of Radiology, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518036, China

    Xiaojuan Xiao

Authors
  1. Yan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinyue Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ziqiang Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiyan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Baolan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shenping Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaojuan Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SY and XX contributed the study concept. YC and XY designed the study. Data acquisition was performed by YC and XY. YC and ZW performed the statistical analysis. YC, XY, ZW, YL, BL, SY and XX contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. YC wrote the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shenping Yu or Xiaojuan Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. All patients provided a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Yang, X., Wen, Z. et al. Association between high-resolution MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion and tumour microcirculation estimated by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in rectal cancer: preliminary results. BMC Cancer 19, 498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5732-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5732-z

Keywords