Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation

BMC Cancer volumeĀ 16, ArticleĀ number:Ā 556 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (Ɨ10āˆ’3 mm2/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADCmin, Maximum - ADCmax, Mean - ADCmean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADCdev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume ā€“ GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-valueā€‰<ā€‰0.05 was considered significant.

Women median age was 52Ā years (range 23ā€“90). 67Ā % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33Ā % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2Ā Gy (range 74ā€“84).

Results

Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), pā€‰=ā€‰0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean (Ā±SD) ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), pā€‰=ā€‰0.03).

With a median follow-up of 32Ā months (range 5ā€“43) 11 patients (17Ā %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12Ā %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADCmin (0.488 Ɨ 10āˆ’3), ADCmean (0.827 Ɨ 10āˆ’3), ADCmax (1.838 Ɨ 10āˆ’3) and ADCdev (0.148 Ɨ 10āˆ’3). ADCmin higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HRā€‰=ā€‰3.632ā€“95Ā % CI: 1.094ā€“12.054; pā€‰=ā€‰0.035) and DSS (HRā€‰=ā€‰4.401ā€“95Ā % CI: 1.048ā€“18.483; pā€‰=ā€‰0.043).

Conclusion

Pre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADCmin may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing.

Peer Review reports

Background

In Brazil, it is estimated that 18,500 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer annually, and 8,400 die [1]. While screening rates for cervical cancer have improved in many countries, there are still a significant number of women who present with locally advanced disease that will require definitive treatment with chemoradiation. Advances in image-guided brachytherapy using Magnetic Resonance Imaging/planning (MRI) rather than 2-dimmensional techniques is significantly improving the outcomes, and changing their patterns of recurrence [2]. With image-based brachytherapy the vast majority of these patients are achieving local control of their tumors with limited serious acute or late morbidity. More women are now recurring with distant rather than local failures with marginal outcomes with systemic therapy in these cases [3]. Efforts are now underway on the OUTBACK trial [4], for example, to potentially improve these clinical outcomes with the addition of systemic chemotherapy following the completion of definitive chemoradiation. One of the challenges of this approach is being able to identify patients at highest risk for poor outcomes following chemoradiation alone. Advances in functional imaging with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and quantification of a standardized uptake value (SUV) can provide prognostic information that may be helpful in identifying women populations at higher risk of failure, thereby allowing for an enriched patient population that is more likely to benefit from escalated therapy [5ā€“7].

In low-middle income countries there are a limited number of cyclotrons available for PET imaging making it impossible to integrate this technology into the routine management of cervical cancer patients. MRI is, however, readily available and routinely utilized for cervical cancer staging in many countries but standard imaging sequences only provide anatomical, and not functional, information. Newer MRI sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provide functional information by characterizing the diffusion of water between cells [8ā€“10]. This can be quantitated, similar to an SUV on PET scans, by calculating an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. Previous investigators have demonstrated high concordance of tumor sub volumes with increased metabolic activity on PET with increased cellular density on DWI imaging suggesting ADC values may have similar prognostic value as SUVmax [8, 11].

DWI imaging has previously been studied in cervical cancer patients with mixed results regarding its utilization as a prognostic/predictive marker [12ā€“14, 15ā€“18]. Given the variation in correlations with DWI imaging, we investigated whether baseline MRI DWI imaging features correlate with clinical outcomes in women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of cervical cancer women treated at Barretos Cancer Hospital, approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Patients were treated using radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy and who had an MRI of the pelvis performed prior to the start of treatment between January 2012 and March of 2013. A total of 135 patients were identified. Forty-six were excluded from further analysis because either their MRI was not performed at our institution or diffusion weighted imaging was not performed. Ten additional women were excluded because they were treated with palliative intent and 13 more were excluded because they did not have sufficient clinical follow-up information available. This left 66 women available for complete analysis.

The study group was classified according to the revised 2009 FIGO staging system. The extent of tumor involvement was based on both clinical examination and MRI findings (i.e. a patient with parametrial involvement on clinical examination but clear involvement on MRI imaging to the pelvic sidewall was classified as FIGO Stage IIIB). Positive lymph nodes were based on MRI findings. A lymph node was considered positive if it had a maximum diameter larger than 1Ā cm with heterogeneity of signal or an irregular contour. Enlarged lymph nodes were not routinely pathologically confirmed.

Eight patients received radiation alone and 58 were treated with chemoradiation. All 66 women received high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a component of their treatment. The mean (SD) external beam and HDR doses were: 44.92 (0.62) Gy and 27.05 (1.67) Gy (7Ā Gy Ɨ 4 being the most common fractionation), respectively. The mean (SD) equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for external beam plus HDR-brachytherapy was 82.2 (2.8) Gy. There was no lymph node boost.

Radiation was delivered using a standard linear accelerator with either 6MV or 15MV beams and planned using a 3D planning method with organ at risk and target volumes contoured by a radiation oncologist. Intensity modulated radiation therapy was not used. All patients were planned using Eclipse version 8.0 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

For the brachytherapy, four fractions of HDR using a tandem and ovoid applicator were delivered to all patients (except two that only received three fractions of 7Ā Gy). The dose was prescribed to point A and was planned based on 2-dimmensional films. Bladder and rectal points were placed as per ICRU 38 guidelines. The constraints for a prescription of 7Ā Gy were 71Ā % (bladder) and 58Ā % (rectum). Dose prescription was diminished to 6.5Ā Gy or 6Ā Gy when the constraints were extrapolated. Brachytherapy planning was performed using GammaMedā„¢ (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

The majority of women (82Ā %) were treated with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy at a dose of 40Ā mg/m2 weekly. Four women received concurrent carboplatin and eight did not receive concurrent chemotherapy.

All patients were followed up with physical exam, abdominal/pelvic imaging and surveillance pap smears every 3 to 6Ā months.

Disease recurrence was determined radiographically by RECIST 1.1 criteria [19] and was not pathologically confirmed. Local regional control was defined as the time from biopsy to local (uterine cervix or vagina) or regional recurrence (pelvic lymph node). Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from biopsy to tumor progression. Disease specific survival (DSS) was defined as the time between biopsy to death by cancer.

Imaging technique and analysis

All images were performed at baseline assessment (before any treatment) on one of two scanners: Achieva 3.0 Tesla, Philips Healthcare, Netherlands or a Signa HDXā€™T 1.5 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee. All patients had trans-vaginal ultrasound gel administered prior to the start of their MRI. The sequences acquired included T2-weighted sequences of the whole pelvis and abdominal region below the renal arteries, axial T1-weighted sequences of the whole pelvis, T2-weighted sequences in the sagittal, axial and coronal planes at an angle through the plane of the cervix, and diffusion-weighted sequences. For the diffusion sequence, the field of view was 40 Ɨ 40, the matrix size was 512, with b-values of 0, 600 (3Ā T scanner) and 0, 800 (1.5Ā T scanner). Acquisition time was 6Ā min. Voxel size was 2.34Ā mm (RL), 3.19Ā mm (AP). Repetition time was 1800Ā ms and slice thickness was 3Ā mm.

After generating the ADC maps, a region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three experienced radiologists (F.R.L., A.K.B.J.N., R.R.R.) on a single DWI slice that showed the lesion at its maximum diameter, using axial FSE T2WI for guidance. PACS software (PixViewer, Viewer MPR - PIXEON) then calculated the ADC minimum (ADCmin), mean (ADCmean), maximum (ADCmax) and standard deviation of the ADC values (ADCdev) (Ɨ10āˆ’3 mm2/s) of the chosen region (Fig.Ā 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging examples of axial slices of: T2 weighted (left), diffusion weighted imaging (center), and region of interest drawn on an attenuation diffusion coefficient map (right)

Full size image

Statistical considerations

The Mann Whitney test was used to compare ADC values of clinical-pathological and treatment-related factors including: FIGO stage (I/II vs III/IV), histology (squamous vs non-squamous), tumor grade (1-2 vs 3), lymph node status (N+ vs N-), parametrial invasion (yes vs no), vaginal invasion (yes vs no), rectal/bladder invasion (yes vs no), Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) (greater than or less than the median), radiation dose to the primary tumor expressed as an EQD2 (greater than or less than the median) and usage of chemotherapy (yes vs no).

ROC curves were built in order to choose a cutoff value for ADC variables. Confirmatory multivariate Cox model analysis was used to test ADC values and associations with DFS and DSS. These models were adjusted by FIGO stage. LRC was evaluated by confirmatory logistic regression using the GTV as the adjustable variable. Three-year survival rates (DFS and DSS) were estimated according to Kaplan Meyer method. Significance level was set at 5Ā % for all statistics.

Availability of data

The data that support our findings will not be shared due to patient privacy issues and the lack of written consent form signed by patients (retrospective study).

Results

Correlations between imaging parameters and baseline clinical features

Of the 66 women included in the analysis, 44 had FIGO stage I-II disease while 22 had stage III-IV disease. Seventy-one percent had well or moderately differentiated disease and 82Ā % had squamous cell cancer. Additional patient details are presented in TableĀ 1.

Table 1 Patient and treatment characteristics
Full size table

TableĀ 2 shows comparisons between baseline clinical features and different ADC values. Women with FIGO stage III-IV disease had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with stage I-II (1.8 vs. 1.5, pā€‰=ā€‰0.007). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative ones (2.0 vs. 1.6, pā€‰=ā€‰0.029). No other significant correlations were seen.

Table 2 Mean ADC values according to tumor stage, lymph node involvement, and MRI assessed disease extent
Full size table

Treatment outcomes

After a median follow up of 32Ā months (range 5ā€“43), 11 patients (17Ā %) developed recurrent disease (from whom three were still alive by the time of the analysis) with a median time to recurrence of 9Ā months (range 5ā€“39). Two patients developed pelvic recurrence only (one an in-field recurrence in the cervix and one in a left external iliac lymph node), five developed distant metastasis only, and four developed both pelvic/distant disease recurrence. For these four patients, the pelvic component of failure included: two in the cervix only and two in the cervix and pelvic lymph nodes. Six out of eight women did not receive concurrent chemo (and were free of disease by the time of the analysis.

There have been a total of nine deaths in the 66 women with a median time to death of 13Ā months (range 9ā€“32). Eight patients (12Ā % of the total 66) have died from cervical cancer (they presented cancer recurrence) and one patient died from a pulmonary embolus who had no evidence of disease at the time of death. Baseline clinical features of the eight patients who died from cervical cancer include: median age 57 (range 36ā€“74), 6/8 SCC, 8/8 moderate/poorly differentiated, 6/8 FIGO stage III-IV, 6/8 received chemotherapy, median GTV volume 154Ā cc, and median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82Ā Gy (range 74ā€“83.9).

The 3-year LRC and DFS for the entire group were 89.3 and 84.8Ā %, respectively. The 3-year DSS was 87.5Ā %. TableĀ 3 shows the univariate analysis for correlation between clinical characteristics with DFS and DSS.

Table 3 Univariate analysis for disease specific survival and disease free survival
Full size table

Cutoff points for predicting the analyzed outcomes were chosen by ROC curve analysis for ADCmin (0.488 Ɨ 10āˆ’3 mm2/s, AUCā€‰=ā€‰0.57; 95Ā % CI: 0.33ā€“0.79), ADCmean (0.827 Ɨ 10āˆ’3 mm2/s, AUCā€‰=ā€‰0.72; 95Ā % CI: 0.56ā€“0.88), ADCmax (1.838 Ɨ 10āˆ’3 mm2/s, AUCā€‰=ā€‰0.70; 95Ā % CI: 0.50ā€“0.90) and ADCdev (0.148 Ɨ 10āˆ’3 mm2/s, AUCā€‰=ā€‰0.60; 95Ā % CI: 0.41ā€“0.78).

TablesĀ 4 and 5 show the multivariate analysis for LRC and survival, respectively. No ADC value was correlated with LRC. ADCmin higher than the cut off was independently associated with worse DFS (HRā€‰=ā€‰3.6ā€“95Ā % CI: 1.09ā€“12.05; pā€‰=ā€‰0.035) and DSS (HRā€‰=ā€‰4.4ā€“95Ā % CI: 1.05ā€“18.5; pā€‰=ā€‰0.043). FiguresĀ 2 and 3 show Kaplan Meyer curves for DFS and DSS, respectively.

Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression models for local regional control
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariate models for disease specific survival and disease free survival
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan Meyer curve for DFS

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan Meyer curve for DSS

Full size image

Discussion

Recent advances in imaging have improved the ability to characterize the full extent of local disease extension, pelvic/para aortic lymph node involvement, and the presence of distant metastasis in cervical cancer patients [11]. Functional information derived from PET/CT like the SUVmax can also be prognostic [5ā€“7]. Unfortunately this advance in PET/CT imaging is not readily available in developing countries such as Brazil. MRI imaging is, however, more accessible. MRI has the advantage of providing superior soft tissue anatomy compared with CT, which in turn improves assessment of locoregional disease. In addition, functional MRI sequences have the potential to make MRI more than just an anatomic tool. Areas of interest can be contoured on DWI imagined and be quantified by calculating an ADC value. DWI imaging is also very practical in that it does not require much additional scan time or require intravenous contrast [10, 12ā€“14].

In this study we found that pre-treatment ADCmax was significantly correlated with FIGO stage and radiographically enlarged lymph nodes. A recent study from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center also showed a significant correlation between pretreatment ADCmean with FIGO stage and the presence of positive lymph nodes [15]. However, while their study showed significantly higher ADCmean for earlier staged disease and uninvolved nodes we found exactly the opposite result (higher values of ADCmax for higher staged disease and positive nodes). This difference demonstrates some of the challenges of comparing results between studies given non-standardized methods for calculating and reporting ADC results and is discussed further below.

Investigating whether baseline ADC values might be a prognostic imaging biomarker may be more important than a correlation with baseline tumor characteristics. If validated this would give us an opportunity to consider risk adapting patients at the start of their treatment rather than waiting until a recurrence or subjecting all patients to an increased intensity regimen, where only a few might actually benefit. Whether ADC values are prognostic, similar to SUVmax, is an area of active investigation with existing publications showing both increased and decreased pre-treatment ADC tumor values correlating with clinical outcomes [20ā€“22].

The literature to date using ADC for assessing prognosis has predominantly focused on metrics such as ADCmin, ADCmax, ADCmean, and ADC percentiles when a histogram-based analysis is used. One recent histogram based analysis includes a recent study of 85 cervical cancer women treated with chemoradiation demonstrating a lower baseline absolute and normalized ADC 95th percentile is associated with shorter disease free survival on multivariate analysis [16]. Other groups have reported on using ADC information gleaned from a single MRI slice. In one retrospective study of 45 cervical cancer women treated with a mix of definitive surgery and chemoradiation, a lower pretreatment ADCmean was predictive of both disease free and overall survival [15]. While these are two of the larger studies published to date looking at correlations between ADC values and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer, there are multiple studies that have been published on this topic with variation in the correlation between ADC values and outcomes. Some studies have correlated higher pre-treatment ADC values with inferior outcomes, while others have correlated lower pre-treatment values with inferior outcomes. These inconsistencies are likely related to multiple factors including: the heterogeneity of the patients, different treatments (surgery vs chemoradiation), various histologies (squamous cell cancer vs adenocarcinoma), use of a single slice region of interests for calculating ADC values which can underestimate the true heterogeneity of the overall tumor, different MRI imaging protocols, retrospective study design, different time points for assessing treatment response, and small patient numbers. These discrepancies point to some of the challenges in comparing data across various studies. Moving forward there needs to be agreed upon imaging and reporting standards so that data can be compared across different institutions. This is not a problem unique to DWI and similar discrepancies have been reported for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI studies in cervical cancer [17].

We looked at standard ADC metrics like the minimum, maximum and mean but also evaluated the ADCdev, which has not been previously reported on. ADCmin and ADCmax represent extreme values that can be very sensitive to tumor composition, i.e., extremely high or extremely low ADC sub-volumes (which could have prognostic value). The fact that ADCmean represents a much larger amount of information (it represents the mean value of all voxels measures including the ADCmin and ADCmax) could explain the observation that it reached significance only in the univariate analysis but didnā€™t do in the multivariate where only ADCmin was significantly associated to outcomes - higher values were correlated with poorer DSS and DFS. A number of studies have linked ADC values to therapy outcomes, with most of them showing that tumors with higher values respond less favorably to therapy [23ā€“27] . Mechanistically this may be explained by the presence of microscopic and macroscopic tumoral necrosis, which can increase ADC values and is linked to poorer outcomes [18, 28]. Our data is in contrast however to Nakamura et al. [29] who analyzed the combination of ADCmin and SUVmax in 66 women with cervical cancer. Women with lower ADCmin showed decreased OS compared to those with the highest values. The fact that we found exactly the opposite in our study (highest values of ADCmin predicting worse DSS) only exemplifies the difficulties in interpreting this data without standardized reporting.

When looking at the makeup of the patients who died from cervical cancer one can see that although the majority had advanced features (FIGO III/IV disease, moderate/poorly differentiated SCC, and large GTV volumes) that there were many patients with similar features who had positive outcomes. This emphasizes the limitations of our current risk stratification schemes that focus on clinical and pathologic features without integrating information about the biology of the tumors. While the underlying biology responsible for variations in ADC values in cervical cancer is not known it does provide functional information that is currently not incorporated into our standard risk stratification tools. Given that the dominant pattern of failure in our cohort included a component of distant failure (nine out of 11 cases) it is critical that we identify women at high risk of distant failure as early on in the natural history of their disease as possible in an effort to improve their outcomes. With additional data itā€™s possible that information gleaned from functional imaging could help identify high risk populations either independently or synergistically with our current clinically based stratification.

There are some weaknesses of our study which include its retrospective design. This contributes to differences in the timing and method of assessment of clinical response as well as the different b-values used for the DWI studies. Variation in b-values occurred due to the adoption of different imaging protocols over time. A study published by Hoogendam et al. however reported that changing the tested b-value combinations did not influence the ADC-based differentiation of benign tissue from malignant tissue and so it is not clear if this impacted the results of this study [30]. Also, we limited the number of adjusted variables in the confirmatory multivariate model in order to avoid an over fitting due to the relative small number of events [31]. Hence, we decided to use well-known prognostic factors as adjusted variables such as FIGO stage for DSS and DFS and GTV for LRC. Moreover, patients were treated using 2-dimmentional brachytherapy and did not have their enlarged lymph nodes boosted. This might have impacted the patterns of failure and ultimate treatment outcomes as has been suggested by the improved outcomes using 3-dimmentional image guided brachytherapy data, however, the local failure rates in this series are low and the predominant failure pattern was distant which is in line with more modern image guided outcomes.

These findings need to be validated in a prospective setting and we have already open a clinical trial measuring ADC values at baseline, mid-treatment, and 3Ā months post-treatment in patients being treated with chemoradiation for cervical cancer. Ultimately a prospective trial will help determine whether baseline or mid-treatment MRI features, as has been suggested by others are independent predictors of outcomes and whether this could be used for selecting patients that may benefit from escalated treatment [32, 33].

Conclusions

Pre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Higher pre-treatment ADCmin measured in the primary tumor of cervical cancer might predict worse disease free survival and disease specific survival in patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing.

Abbreviations

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; ADCdev, standard deviation of the ADC; ADCmax, maximum value of ADC; ADCmean, mean value of ADC; ADCmin, minimum value of ADC; AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; DFS, disease free survival; DSS, disease specific survival; DW, diffusion weighted; HDR, high dose rate; HR, hazard ratio; LRC, local regional control; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ROI, region of interest; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SD, standard deviation; SUV, standardized uptake value

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87ā€“108.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Schmid MP, Franckena M, Kirchheiner K, Sturdza A, Georg P, Dƶrr W, et al. Distant metastasis in patients with cervical cancer after primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(2):256ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long 3rd HJ, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734ā€“43.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. https://www.rtog.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lU6JlzhBt7s%3D&tabid=290 (2016). Accessed 25 Mar 2016.

  5. Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(6):1469ā€“75.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. Cancer. 2007;110(8):1738ā€“44.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Siva S, Deb S, Young RJ, Hicks RJ, Callahan J, Bressel M, Mileshkin L, et al. F-FDG PET/CT following chemoradiation of uterine cervix cancer provides powerful prognostic stratification independent of HPV status: a prospective cohort of 105 women with mature survival data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(12):1825ā€“32.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Olsen JR, Esthappan J, DeWees T, Narra VR, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Tumor volume and subvolume concordance between FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(2):431ā€“4.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, Takeda K. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Comparison to histopathological findings. J Neuroradiol. 2007;34:183ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1468ā€“77.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Sun H, Xin J, Zhang S, Guo Q, Lu Y, Zhai W, et al. Anatomical and functional volume concordance between FDG PET, and T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI for cervical cancer: a hybrid PET/MR study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(5):898ā€“905.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1058ā€“64.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Rizzo S, Summers P, Raimondi S, Belmonte M, Maniglio M, Landoni F, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in assessing cervical tumour response to nonsurgical therapy. Radiol Med. 2011;116:766ā€“80.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:858ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. MiccĆ² M, Vargas HA, Burger IA, Kollmeier MA, Goldman DA, Park KJ. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:1169ā€“76.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Xie J, Halankar J, Metser U. Association of appartent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology. 2016;279(1):158ā€“66.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Lund KV, Simonsen TG, Hompland T, Kristensen GB, Rofstad EK. Short-term pretreatment DCE-MRI in prediction of outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015;115(3):379ā€“85.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D, Chenevert TL, Toeny HC, Takahara T, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009;11:102ā€“25.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228ā€“47.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:71ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Frederick L, Greene David L, Page Irvin D, Fleming April G, Fritz Charles M, Balch Daniel G, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Huettner PC, Rader JS, et al. Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2005;104:2484ā€“91.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Koh DM, Padhani AR. Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new functional clinical technique for tumour imaging. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:633ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Lemaire L, Howe FA, Rodrigues LM, Griffiths JR. Assessment of induced rat mammary tumour response to chemotherapy using the apparent diffusion coefficient of tissue water as determined by diffusion-weighted 1H-NMR spectroscopy in vivo. Magma. 1999;8:20ā€“6.

    CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Dzik-Jurasz A, Domenig C, George M, Wolber J, Padhani A, Brown G, et al. Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation. Lancet. 2002;360:307ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. DeVries AF, Kremser C, Hein PA, Griebel J, Krezcy A, Ofner D, et al. Tumor microcirculation and diffusion predict therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:958ā€“65.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Cui Y, Zhang XP, Sun YS, Tang L, Shen L. Apparent diffusion coefficient: potential imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in hepatic metastases. Radiology. 2008;248:894ā€“900.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Li SP, Padhani AR. Tumor response assessments with diffusion and perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(4):745ā€“63.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Nakamura K, Joja I, Kodama J, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y. Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumor is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:283ā€“90.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Hoogendam JP, Klerkx WM, de Kort GA, Bipat S, Zweemer RP, Sie-Go DM, et al. The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:376ā€“82.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Simonetti AW, Kim E, Park BK, et al. Assessment of early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:993ā€“1000.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T, Fukushima C, Kusumoto T, Seki N, et al. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:478ā€“83.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Weā€™d like to thanks Dr. Marcelo Dimas Spadim, Dr Fernanda Buongusto, Dr Tatiana LeitĆ£o Azevedo, Ligia Zampiere de Britto, Talita Gracia do Nascimento and Mr. Roy Hary (BS, EMT, USA) by the support with this paper.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentially reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authorsā€™ contributions

DGM discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design), collected clinical data and drafted the manuscript. JHTGF discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design), performed the statistical analysis and drafted the paper. RRR discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design), collected radiological data and drafted the manuscript. AKBJN discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design), collected radiological data and drafted the manuscript. FRL discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design), collected radiological data and drafted the manuscript. ATT discussed the initial purpose of the study (conception, design) and drafted the manuscript. MK discussed the initial purpose of the study and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As a retrospective study, consent inform was not given to patients. However, patient records/information was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis. It was approved by the Barretos Cancer Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Research involving animals

Not applicable.

Research involving plants

Not applicable.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, Barretos, Sao Paulo, 14784-400, Brazil

    Daniel Grossi Marconi

  2. Department of Gynecology Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro FregnaniĀ &Ā Audrey Tieko Tsunoda

  3. Department of Radiology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Rodrigo Ribeiro Rossini,Ā Ana Karina Borges Junqueira NettoĀ &Ā Fabiano RubiĆ£o Lucchesi

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Mitchell Kamrava

Authors
  1. Daniel Grossi Marconi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  2. Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo Ribeiro Rossini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  4. Ana Karina Borges Junqueira Netto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  5. Fabiano RubiĆ£o Lucchesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  6. Audrey Tieko Tsunoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  7. Mitchell Kamrava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Grossi Marconi.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marconi, D.G., Fregnani, J.H.T.G., Rossini, R.R. et al. Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. BMC Cancer 16, 556 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2619-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2619-0

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us