Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prognostic and clinical impact of PIK3CA mutation in gastric cancer: pyrosequencing technology and literature review

BMC Cancer volume 16, Article number: 400 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations that activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway have been observed in several types of carcinoma and have been associated with patient prognosis. However, the significance of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Additionally, we reviewed the rate of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer and the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers.

Methods

The study included 208 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection at Kumamoto University Hospital, Japan, between January 2001 and August 2010. Mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were quantified by pyrosequencing assays.

Results

PIK3CA mutations were detected in 25 (12 %) of the 208 patients. Ten patients had c.1634A > G (p.E545G), 10 had c.1624G > A (p.E542K), 13 had c.1633G > A (p.E545K), nine had c.3139C > T (p.H1047R), and 1 had c.3140A > G (p.H1047Y) mutations. PIK3CA mutations were not significantly associated with any clinical, epidemiologic, or pathologic characteristic. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival (log rank P = 0.84) and overall survival (log rank P = 0.74) between patients with and without PIK3CA mutations.

Conclusions

Mutations in PIK3CA did not correlate with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer, providing additional evidence for the lack of relationship between the two.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the world, with 723,000 patients dying of gastric cancer in 2012 [1]. Elucidating the biological pathways leading to the development of gastric carcinoma is crucial because accumulation of genetic alterations has been shown to result in tumor development [2]. Genetic alterations involving proteins along several signaling pathways, such as the constitutive activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and G-protein-coupled receptors, and GTP-binding proteins to adaptor proteins, could lead to activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway [3–6]. As PI3K signaling plays essential roles in cell growth, metabolism, survival, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy, the PI3K-AKT pathway has been considered extremely important in the carcinogenic process [7–10].

Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene, which encodes the p110 catalytic subunit of PI3K, have been found in several types of carcinoma [11, 12]. The hot spots of PIK3CA mutations have been located at five sites in exons 9 and 20 [13]. These mutations activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, activating downstream signaling pathways, and thereby contribute to carcinogenesis [13]. PIK3CA mutations in several types of human cancer have been associated with patient prognosis. However the impact of PIK3CA mutations on prognosis varies among tumor types [14].

The significance of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer remains unclear. Although several reports have shown a relationship between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis, relative few patients were analyzed and findings differ among studies. This study used pyrosequencing to evaluate PIK3CA mutations in patients with gastric cancer at our hospital, as well as determining the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and patient prognosis. Additionally, we reviewed the rate of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer and the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers.

Methods

Study subjects

This study retrospectively enrolled 208 gastric cancer patients who underwent resection at Kumamoto University Hospital between January 2001 and August 2010. Patients who underwent palliative resection and/or whose tissue samples were unavailable were excluded, but patients positive on peritoneal washing cytology were included. Patients were followed-up at 1- to 3-month intervals until death or 31 March 2015, whichever came first. Disease-free survival was defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of cancer recurrence or death. Tumors were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition) [15]. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the operation to the date of death. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Epidemiological and General Research at the Faculty of life Science, Kumamoto University (Approval number: Ethic 559). Throughout this article, the definition of “prognostic marker” is consistent with REMARK Guidelines [16].

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of surgically resected gastric cancers. Tumors areas were marked on hematoxylin and eosin stained slides by one pathologist (Y. Baba). Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor lesions enriched with neoplastic cells, without adjacent normal tissue, using FFPE Kits (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany).

Pyrosequencing for PIK3CA mutations

PIK3CA mutations were evaluated as previously described [14]. The exon 9 PCR primers were 5′-biotin-AACAGCTCAAAGCAATTTCTACACG-3′ (forward, PIK3CA 9-F) and 5′-ACCTGTGACTCCATAGAAAATCTTT-3′ (reverse, PIK3CA9-R). The exon 20 PCR primers were 5′-biotin-CAAGAGGCTTTGGAGTATTTCA-3′ (forward, PIK3CA 20-F) and 5′-CAATCCATTTTTGTTGTCCA-3′ (reverse, PIK3CA 20-R). In the PIK3CA exon 9 pyrosequencing assays, the presence of mutations was routinely confirmed using three different sequencing primers and by the creation of a frameshifted reading of a mutant sequence relative to a wild-type sequence. The primers PIK3CA 9-RS1 (5′-CCATAGAAAATCTTTCTCCT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATCGACTACACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTG), PIK3CA 9-RS2 (5′ TTCTCCTTGCTTCAGTGATTT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATACACATGTCAGTCAGACTAGCTAGCTAGCTAG) and PIK3CA 9-RS3 (5′-TAGAAAATCTTTCTCCTGCT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATAGCACTGACTGACTGACTACTGACTGACTGACTG) could detectc.1634A > G, c.1624A > G, and c.1624G > A mutations, respectively. For PIK3CA exon 20, the primer PIK3CA 20-RS (5′-GTTGTCCAGCCACCA-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, CTGACGATACTGTGCATCATATGCATGCATGCATGCATGC) was used to detect the mutations c.3140A > G and c.3139C > T. Nucleotide dispensation orders were designed so that if any of the common mutations were present, it caused a shift in the reading frame and resulted in an additional peak or peaks following the mutated nucleotide. Representative pyrograms of wild-type and mutant exons 9 and 20 are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PIK3CA exon 9 and exon 20 pyrograms (antisense strand). a Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS1 primer and the c.1634A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead), which serves as quality assurance. b Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS2 primer and the c.1624G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead). c Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS3 primer and the c.1633G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and new peaks (arrowheads). d Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3139C > T mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at T (arrowhead). Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3140A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at G (arrowhead). Mut, mutant; WT, wild-type

Full size image

Statistical methods

The results were statistically analyzed by JMP software (Version 9, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All p-values were two-sided. The means were compared by t test, assuming unequal variances. The proportional differences among the characteristics were evaluated by Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ 2). Survival time was determined by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The hazard ratio for PIK3CA mutations on mortality was assessed by Cox regression modeling. To assess whether any of these variables was associated with the relationship between the PIK3CA mutations and prognosis, they were cross-multiplied with PIK3CA mutations and subjected to the Wald test.

Results

PIK3CA mutational status in gastric cancer

Of the 208 patients who had undergone curative resection of gastric cancer, 25 (12 %) were found pyrosequencing technology to have PIK3CA exon 9 and 20 mutations (Fig. 1). Ten patients were positive for c.1634A > G (p.E545G), 10 for c.1624G > A (p.E542K), 13 for c. c.1633G > A (p.E545K), nine for c. 3139C > T (p.H1047R), and one for c. 3140A > G (p.H1047Y) mutations. Three tumors were positive for mutations at all three nucleotides in exon 9, three were positive for mutations at two nucleotides in exon 9. Fifteen samples were positive for mutations in exon 9 alone, four for mutations in exon 20 alone, and six were positive for mutations in both exons.

PIK3CA mutations and patient characteristics

PIK3CA mutations were not significantly associated with any clinical, epidemiologic, or pathologic characteristic (Table 1). We previously reported that the long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) methylation level in gastric cancer was a surrogate marker of global DNA methylation and genome instability [17, 18]. However, LINE-1 methylation level was not associated with PIK3CA mutations (Table 1).

Table 1 PIK3CA mutational status and clinical features in gastric cancers
Full size table

PIK3CA mutations and patient survival

We assessed the influence of PIK3CA mutations on clinical outcome in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. During follow-up of the 208 patients, 32 patients experienced gastric cancer recurrence and 69 died. The median follow-up time for censored patients was 5.0 years. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival (log rank P = 0.84) and overall survival (log rank P = 0.74) between patients with PIK3CA mutations and those with PIK3CA wild type (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves showing the relationship of PIK3CA mutational status with overall survival (left) and disease-free survival (right) in gastric cancer patients

Full size image

Interaction between PIK3CA mutations and other variables in survival analyses

We also examined whether the influence of PIK3CA mutations on overall survival was modified by any clinical or pathological variable. All tested variables did not significantly interact with the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and overall survival (p for all interactions >0.05, Fig. 3). Moreover, analysis of various strata showed no significant difference in hazard ratio for overall survival between patients with PIK3CA mutations and those with PIK3CA wild type (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

PIK3CA mutations and overall survival in various strata. The loge (adjusted HRs) plot of overall survival in the PIK3CA mutation vs. PIK3CA wild-type group. The 95 % CI is also shown

Full size image

Discussion

PIK3CA mutations and subsequent activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway play an essential role in cancer cell signaling pathways, involving growth factors, cytokines, and other cellular stimuli associated with human neoplasms [11, 12, 19, 20]. This study examined the prognostic impact of PIK3CA mutations on survival in patients with gastric cancer. Mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were observed in 25 of the 208 (12 %) gastric cancer patients. However, overall survival and disease-free survival were similar in patients with and without PIK3CA mutations, indicating that PIK3CA mutations do not affect mortality after resection of gastric cancer.

PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutation accounted for over the 80 % of the mutations [6]. Exon 9 mutation exist in helical domain, and exon 20 mutation exist in kinase domain, leading to the activating of AKT pathway and then stimulating the ability of invasion and migration [13]. Especially, E545K mutation disrupts inhibitory interaction between p110 and SH2 domain in p85 [21]. Importantly, Baba et al. have shown the relationship between tumor phosphorylated AKT expression and PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutation in 717 colorectal cancer [22]. The oncogenic role of mutations other than hot spot mutation has not been fully investigated. Interestingly, some tumor samples had multiple mutations on exon 9 and 20. Some group have also detected several different PIK3CA mutations in same sample by using next-generation sequencing and Sanger Sequencing. It is possible that one sample harvest three or two different mutations in the same gene [23, 24]. In addition, PIK3CA mutation can coexist with KRAS, EGFR and BRAF [25]. Thus, PIK3CA mutation has been involved in molecular pathway of cancer.

Other studies have reported PIK3CA mutations in 4–25 % of gastric cancers (Table 2). The largest cohort was assessed by the TOGA study group, finding that the PIK3CA mutation rate was 24 %, or about twice as high as in the current study. However, that study evaluated mutations in all exons. A study in a Japanese population found that the mutation rate in PIK3CA exons 1, 9, and 20, as determined by pyrosequencing, was 8.7 % [26]. Directed sequencing found that the mutation rate in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 was 7.7–15.9 % [27, 28]. Thus, the PIK3CA mutation rate observed in the current study (12 %) was comparable to rates previously reported. Interestingly, the PIK3CA mutation rate in gastric cancer is less than that in colon and breast cancers [29, 30].

Table 2 Previous studies of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer
Full size table

Previous studies evaluating the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers have yielded variable results (Table 3). PIK3CA mutations have been associated with a better prognosis in patients with breast and esophageal cancers, but with a poorer prognosis in patients with colon, rectum, and endometrial cancers [31–35]. These differences may be due to differences in tumor histology. Discovering the mechanisms of this discrepancy is imperative for future projects.

Table 3 Studies on prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations in several types of cancers
Full size table

The current study found that PIK3CA mutations were not associated with survival in patients with gastric cancer, in agreement with three previous studies [26–28]. Because of their relatively large sample sizes, including this study that included samples from over 200 samples, these findings, taken together, confirm the lack of relationship between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in gastric cancer patients. These findings, however, require confirmation by large independent cohort studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were observed in 25 of the 208 (12 %) gastric cancer patients by pyrosequencing assays. We found that PIK3CA mutations did not correlate with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer, providing additional evidence for the lack of relationship between the two.

Abbreviations

LINE-1, long interspersed nucleotide element-1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):359–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng N, Goh LK, Wang H, Das K, Tao J, Tan IB, et al. A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets. Gut. 2012;61(5):673–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Handschick K, Beuerlein K, Jurida L, Bartkuhn M, Muller H, Soelch J, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 is a chromatin-bound cofactor for NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression. Mol Cell. 2014;53(2):193–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantley LC. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science. 2002;296(5573):1655–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katso R, Okkenhaug K, Ahmadi K, White S, Timms J, Waterfield MD. Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases: implications for development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:615–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, Szabo S, et al. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science. 2004;304(5670):554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willems L, Tamburini J, Chapuis N, Lacombe C, Mayeux P, Bouscary D. PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways in cancer: new data on targeted therapies. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14(2):129–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun M, Wang G, Paciga JE, Feldman RI, Yuan ZQ, Ma XL, et al. AKT1/PKBalpha kinase is frequently elevated in human cancers and its constitutive activation is required for oncogenic transformation in NIH3T3 cells. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(2):431–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Itoh N, Semba S, Ito M, Takeda H, Kawata S, Yamakawa M. Phosphorylation of Akt/PKB is required for suppression of cancer cell apoptosis and tumor progression in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94(12):3127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuoka T, Yashiro M. The Role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling in Gastric Carcinoma. Cancers. 2014;6(3):1441–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(8):606–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Samuels Y, Diaz Jr LA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Cummins JM, Delong L, Cheong I, et al. Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(6):561–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shigaki H, Baba Y, Watanabe M, Murata A, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. PIK3CA mutation is associated with a favorable prognosis among patients with curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(9):2451–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(16):1180–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shigaki H, Baba Y, Watanabe M, Murata A, Iwagami S, Miyake K, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in gastric cancer, detected by bisulfite pyrosequencing, is associated with poor prognosis. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(4):480–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cordaux R, Batzer MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(10):691–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gymnopoulos M, Elsliger MA, Vogt PK. Rare cancer-specific mutations in PIK3CA show gain of function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(13):5569–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikenoue T, Kanai F, Hikiba Y, Obata T, Tanaka Y, Imamura J, et al. Functional analysis of PIK3CA gene mutations in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(11):4562–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miled N, Yan Y, Hon WC, Perisic O, Zvelebil M, Inbar Y, et al. Mechanism of two classes of cancer mutations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalytic subunit. Science. 2007;317(5835):239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baba Y, Nosho K, Shima K, Hayashi M, Meyerhardt JA, Chan AT, et al. Phosphorylated AKT expression is associated with PIK3CA mutation, low stage, and favorable outcome in 717 colorectal cancers. Cancer. 2011;117(7):1399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dirican E, Kaya Z, Gullu G, Peker I, Ozmen T, Gulluoglu BM, et al. Detection of PIK3CA gene mutations with HRM analysis and association with IGFBP-5 expression levels in breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arsenic R, Treue D, Lehmann A, Hummel M, Dietel M, Denkert C, Budczies J. Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing for the detection of PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer. BMC Clin Pathol. 2015;15:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sukawa Y, Yamamoto H, Nosho K, Kunimoto H, Suzuki H, Adachi Y, et al. Alterations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-v-Akt pathway in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45):6577–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Barbi S, Cataldo I, De Manzoni G, Bersani S, Lamba S, Mattuzzi S, et al. The analysis of PIK3CA mutations in gastric carcinoma and metanalysis of literature suggest that exon-selectivity is a signature of cancer type. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee H, Hwang IS, Choi IJ, Kang YN, Park KU, Lee JH. Are PIK3CA Mutation and Amplification Associated with Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(11):4493–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, Shima K, Irahara N, Kure S, et al. PIK3CA mutation is associated with poor prognosis among patients with curatively resected colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1477–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalinsky K, Jacks LM, Heguy A, Patil S, Drobnjak M, Bhanot UK, et al. PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(16):5049–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liao X, Morikawa T, Lochhead P, Imamura Y, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, et al. Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(8):2257–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. He Y, Van’t Veer LJ, Mikolajewska-Hanclich I, van Velthuysen ML, Zeestraten EC, Nagtegaal ID, et al. PIK3CA mutations predict local recurrences in rectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(22):6956–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Garcia-Dios DA, Lambrechts D, Coenegrachts L, Vandenput I, Capoen A, Webb PM, et al. High-throughput interrogation of PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, FBXW7 and TP53 mutations in primary endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(2):327–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Loi S, Michiels S, Lambrechts D, Fumagalli D, Claes B, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Somatic mutation profiling and associations with prognosis and trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(13):960–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Maruyama N, Miyoshi Y, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y, Monden M, Noguchi S. Clinicopathologic analysis of breast cancers with PIK3CA mutations in Japanese women. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(2):408–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Takahashi N, Yamada Y, Taniguchi H, Fukahori M, Sasaki Y, Shoji H, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic roles of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and NRAS mutations in advanced gastric cancer. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Velho S, Oliveira C, Ferreira A, Ferreira AC, Suriano G, Schwartz Jr S, et al. The prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in gastric and colon cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(11):1649–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li VS, Wong CW, Chan TL, Chan AS, Zhao W, Chu KM, et al. Mutations of PIK3CA in gastric adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, Lee HW, Park WS, Nam SW, et al. PIK3CA gene is frequently mutated in breast carcinomas and hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene. 2005;24(8):1477–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moehler M, Mueller A, Trarbach T, Lordick F, Seufferlein T, Kubicka S, et al. Cetuximab with irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer: a prospective multi-center biomarker-oriented phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1358–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513(7517):202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chong ML, Loh M, Thakkar B, Pang B, Iacopetta B, Soong R. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway aberrations in gastric and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis, co-occurrence and ethnic variation. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(5):1232–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang L, Shan L, Zhang S, Ying J, Xue L, Yuan Y, et al. PIK3CA gene mutations and overexpression: implications for prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in Chinese esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e103021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang L, Hu H, Pan Y, Wang R, Li Y, Shen L, et al. PIK3CA mutations frequently coexist with EGFR/KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and suggest poor prognosis in EGFR/KRAS wildtype subgroup. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kawano O, Sasaki H, Endo K, Suzuki E, Haneda H, Yukiue H, et al. PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2006;54(2):209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets on which the conclusions of the paper are either presented in the main manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design: KH, YB, SS, MW and HB; acquisition of data: KH, YB, TI, KK, RT, DI, MO, KN, YKi, JK, MI, SI, YM, YS and NY; analysis and interpretation of data: KH and YB; manuscript writing: KH, YB, and HB. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. The study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Epidemiological and General Research at the Faculty of life Science, Kumamoto University (Approval number: Ethic 559). Informed consent for this study was obtained from all patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan

    Kazuto Harada, Yoshifumi Baba, Hironobu Shigaki, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Keisuke Miyake, Keisuke Kosumi, Ryuma Tokunaga, Daisuke Izumi, Mayuko Ohuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Yuki Kiyozumi, Junji Kurashige, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Yuji Miyamoto, Yasuo Sakamoto, Naoya Yoshida & Hideo Baba

  2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

    Masayuki Watanabe

Authors
  1. Kazuto Harada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshifumi Baba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hironobu Shigaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takatsugu Ishimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keisuke Miyake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Keisuke Kosumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ryuma Tokunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daisuke Izumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mayuko Ohuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kenichi Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuki Kiyozumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Junji Kurashige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Masaaki Iwatsuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuji Miyamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yasuo Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Naoya Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Masayuki Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hideo Baba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Baba.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harada, K., Baba, Y., Shigaki, H. et al. Prognostic and clinical impact of PIK3CA mutation in gastric cancer: pyrosequencing technology and literature review. BMC Cancer 16, 400 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2422-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2422-y

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us