Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor Obatoclax is a potent late stage autophagy inhibitor in colorectal cancer cells independent of canonical autophagy signaling

  • Bruno Christian Koehler1Email author,
  • Adam Jassowicz1,
  • Anna-Lena Scherr1,
  • Stephan Lorenz1,
  • Praveen Radhakrishnan2,
  • Nicole Kautz1,
  • Christin Elssner1,
  • Johanna Weiss3,
  • Dirk Jaeger1,
  • Martin Schneider2 and
  • Henning Schulze-Bergkamen1, 4
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201515:919

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1929-y

Received: 5 August 2015

Accepted: 12 November 2015

Published: 19 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy in humans and novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Autophagy is an evolutionarily highly conserved cellular process by which cells collect unnecessary organelles or misfolded proteins and subsequently degrade them in vesicular structures in order to refuel cells with energy. Dysregulation of the complex autophagy signaling network has been shown to contribute to the onset and progression of cancer in various models. The Bcl-2 family of proteins comprises central regulators of apoptosis signaling and has been linked to processes involved in autophagy. The antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins have been identified as promising anticancer drug targets and small molecules inhibiting those proteins are in clinical trials.

Methods

Flow cytometry and colorimetric assays were used to assess cell growth and cell death. Long term 3D cell culture was used to assess autophagy in a tissue mimicking environment in vitro. RNA interference was applied to modulate autophagy signaling. Immunoblotting and q-RT PCR were used to investigate autophagy signaling. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy were used to detect autophagosome formation and autophagy flux.

Results

This study demonstrates that autophagy inhibition by obatoclax induces cell death in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells in an autophagy prone environment. Here, we demonstrate that pan-Bcl-2 inhibition by obatoclax causes a striking, late stage inhibition of autophagy in CRC cells. In contrast, ABT-737, a Mcl-1 sparing Bcl-2 inhibitor, failed to interfere with autophagy signaling. Accumulation of p62 as well as Light Chain 3 (LC3) was observed in cells treated with obatoclax. Autophagy inhibition caused by obatoclax is further augmented in stressful conditions such as starvation. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that inhibition of autophagy caused by obatoclax is independent of the essential pro-autophagy proteins Beclin-1, Atg7 and Atg12.

Conclusions

The objective of this study was to dissect the contribution of Bcl-2 proteins to autophagy in CRC cells and to explore the potential of Bcl-2 inhibitors for autophagy modulation. Collectively, our data argue for a Beclin-1 independent autophagy inhibition by obatoclax. Based on this study, we recommend the concept of autophagy inhibition as therapeutic strategy for CRC.

Keywords

AutophagyColorectal cancerApoptosisAutophagy related geneLC3p62 (SQSTM1)ObatoclaxChloroquine

Background

Colorectal tumors are one of the major causes for cancer related death in humans [1]. Even if novel and targeted therapeutic approaches are rapidly emerging, the prognosis in the metastatic stage (UICC IV) is restricted.

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process of cellular self-digestion, which is indispensable in situations of cellular stress such as hypoxia, energy deprivation or an acidic environment [2]. In gut development and pathophysiology, autophagy plays a decisive role [3]. An imbalance within the tightly regulated autophagy network has implications for various human diseases including cancer [4, 5]. It has been proven in various cancer models that autophagy represents an important mechanism by which cancer cells maintain their highly active metabolism [6, 7]. Furthermore, autophagy may provide resistance towards antitumor therapy [8]. The exact mechanism by which autophagy modulates malignant transformation has been a matter of controversy in current research [7, 9].

By now, there is a huge and growing body of preclinical and clinical data investigating genetic or chemical approaches to block autophagy as a therapeutic strategy in cancer [6, 10, 11]. Potent autophagy inhibitors such as the malaria drug chloroquine have entered late stage clinical trials [12]. Little is known regarding autophagy inhibition in colorectal cancer. Studies present heterogeneous data regarding autophagy in CRC [1315].

The Bcl-2 family of proteins is mainly known for its pivotal role in the regulation of mitochondrial apoptosis [16]. A variety of small molecules targeting antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins have been developed with the aim to overcome cell death resistance in cancer [17]. Several Bcl-2 inhibitors have entered clinical trials [17, 18]. In addition, it has been shown that antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins interfere with autophagy signaling. For instance, Bcl-2 binds, among others, to proautophagic Beclin-1, thereby blocking autophagy induction [19, 20].

In order to prove the feasibility and potency of autophagy inhibition as concept for colorectal cancer treatment, this study first aimed at investigating chloroquine in CRC cells as a model agent for autophagy inhibition.

There are several Bcl-2 mimicking small molecules available. In this study we investigated pan Bcl-2 inhibition by obatoclax compared to the Mcl-1 sparing inhibitor ABT-737. We have recently shown that the pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor obatoclax induces cell cycle arrest and blocks migration in CRC cells rather than causing direct cell death, arguing for pleiotropic antitumor effects of this agent [21]. Since others have reported a contribution of obatoclax to autophagy signaling in cancer, we focused on autophagy in CRC cells treated with obatoclax [22, 23]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further dissect the anti-cancer properties of obatoclax in colorectal cancer cells and to further elucidate the contribution of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins in the crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy.

Methods

Reagents and cell lines

The colorectal cancer cells HT29 and SW480 were obtained from ATCC and cultured under standard conditions as described previously, supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (PAA laboratories, Cölbe, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere [21]. Starvation was induced using OptiMEM (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) as a reduced medium without supplements.

Chloroquine was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Hamburg, Germany). Obatoclax and ABT-737 were obtained from Selleckchem (Munich, Germany), staurosporine was from Enzo Life Science (Farmingdale, NY, USA).

RNA-interference and transfection

Transfections were carried out in OptiMEM without supplements using Lipofectamine RNAi-Max (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) as described [24]. Sequences for siRNA targeting Mcl-1, Beclin-1, Atg7 and Atg12 are available upon request; a non-targeting siRNA (siScramble) was used as a control (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany). 24 h post transfection cells were treated for 48 h

Cell death and growth assays

Flow cytometry analyses were performed using a FACS CANTO II (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) as described previously [21]. Cells in the sub-G1 fraction were depicted as apoptotic.

Cell growth was assessed using a colorimetric 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) based assay as described previously [25]. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm using a plate reader (Infinite 200 pro; Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Values were normalized to untreated controls.

Immunohistochemistry and 3D cell culture

Sections (8 μm thickness) were fixed in 4 % PFA and stained with haematoxylin and eosin according to standard procedures. Immunohistochemistry was performed using NovoLink Polymer detection System (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were captured using an inverted microscope (Keyence, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). Images were analyzed using CellSense® and ImageJ software.

Long term cell culture in 3-dimensional ALVETEX scaffolds (Reinnervate, Sedgefield, UK) fosters cell-cell-interactions in a tissue mimicking environment and has been described previously [24]. Fresh medium was added every 48 h. After 7 days of treatment, scaffolds were collected, shock frozen and subsequently sectioned and stained as described [24]. The following antibodies were used for detection: anti-LC3b (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA) anti-p62 (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

SDS-Page, western blotting and q-RT PCR

Cell lysis, SDS-page and western blotting were performed according to standard procedures as described previously [21]. The following antibodies were used: anti-Mcl-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), anti-LC3b (Cell Signaling), anti-p62 (BD), anti-Atg12 (Cell Signaling), anti-Atg7 (Cell Signaling), anti-Tubulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (q-RT PCR) were carried out as described using primer assay kits [21]. Each reaction was run in duplicates, values were normalized to GAPDH as housekeeping gene.

Supravital cell-staining with acridine orange

Cells grown on cover slips were treated as described. 24 h following initial treatment, cells were incubated with medium containing 2 μg/mL acridine orange (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min. Subsequently, medium containing acridine orange was removed and cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed using 4 % PFA (Merck) for 15 min at room temperature. Pictures were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal laser scanning microscope with ZEN microscopy software at 63x magnification.

Immunofluorescence

Cells grown on cover slips were treated as described above. 24 h following initial treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed using ice-cold methanol at −20 °C for 20 min. Fixed cells were washed twice with PBS and blocked in PBS containing 5 % BSA and 0.3 % Triton™ X-100 (Merck) for 1 h. After blocking, cells were incubated with primary antibodies in PBS with 1 % BSA and 0.3 % Triton™ X-100 at 4 °C overnight. The next day, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently counterstained with PBS containing 2 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 trihydrochloride trihydrate (Invitrogen) for 15 min at room temperature. Pictures were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal laser scanning microscope with ZEN microscopy software at 63 × magnification and 10 x magnification for counting of LC3II puncta. The average of 5 visual fields at 10 x magnification was used.

In vitro lysosomal staining

Cells grown in 12-well cell-culture plates were treated as described above. 24 h following initial treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with reaction buffer containing 2 μL Cyto-ID® Green Detection Reagent (Enzo), 1 μL Hoechst 33342, Trihydrochloride, Trihydrate (Enzo) and 5 % FCS per mL reaction buffer for 25 min at 37 °C in a cell incubator [26]. Subsequently, the reaction buffer was removed, cells were washed and fresh reaction buffer was added. Cell-culture plates were analyzed using a Biorevo BZ-9000 Inverted fluorescence phase-contrast microscope with BZ-observer microscopy software (Keyence) at 40x magnification.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using student’s t-test (paired, two sided) based on normal data distribution. All statistics were calculated using SPSS 20 (IBM, NY, USA), p-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Late stage autophagy inhibition induces apoptosis in starved CRC cells

Chloroquine (CQ) has been widely used as a model agent for autophagy inhibition [27, 28]. Here, we demonstrate that CQ has limited impact on HT29 and SW480 CRC cells in fully supplemented growth medium. In contrast, CQ is able to induce cell death in CRC cells under conditions of starvation (Additional file 1: Figure S1 A left and right graph, p < 0.001).

In order to investigate autophagy signaling upon CQ treatment, we assessed protein levels of Light Chain Enhancer 3 (LC3) and the conversion from soluble LC3I to membrane-bound LC3II, which is indicative for autophagy flux activation (Additional file 1: Figure S1 B) [29, 30]. In addition, we observed accumulation of p62, also termed sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) in cells under CQ treatment. P62 gets degraded in autophagic vesicles and is therefore an indicator of autophagic flux [31, 32]. Lysotracker and acridine orange (AO) staining revealed marked cytosolic accumulation of acidic vesicles in HT29 and SW480 cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1 C and Additional file 2: Figure S2) [3335]. Of note, hypoxia and cell death induced by staurosporine (STS) failed to modulate autophagy as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1 B.

Obatoclax inhibits cell growth and induces cell death in autophagy promoting conditions

In starving cells, catabolic autophagy becomes crucial to keep cell metabolism running. Our data show that obatoclax-induced growth inhibition in SW480 and HT29 colorectal cancer cells is profoundly augmented under starvation (Fig. 1 a, left and right upper graphs). Of note, starvation alone did not reduce growth of HT29 and SW480 cells (data not shown).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Obatoclax blocks cell growth and induces apoptosis in starving CRC cells. a and b HT29 and SW480 cells were treated with obatoclax in full supplemented medium or starvation as indicated. a Cell growth was assessed by MTT-Assay after 48 h. Cell death was assessed by Flow Cytometry after 48 h. Assays were done in triplicates. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. b Representative Western blots for p62 and LC3 I/II in HT29 and SW480 treated with obatoclax or ABT-737 in full supplemented medium as indicated. c Rel. mRNA levels of LC3 in HT29 cells after 24 h treatment with obatoclax. mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH as housekeeping gene. Assays are representative of at least three independent experiments . ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001

HT29 cells are resistant to obatoclax-induced cell death even under starving conditions. By contrast, SW480 cells show a high sensitivity towards obatoclax, which is strikingly enhanced upon starvation. The amount of propidium iodide (PI) positive SW480 cells increased from 21 % to 46 % when exposed to starvation instead of fully supplemented medium after 48 h obatoclax treatment (Fig. 1a, p < 0.001).

In order to investigate the role of obatoclax in autophagy of CRC cells, we performed western blot analyses. We show that obatoclax, but not ABT-737, induces profound inhibition of autophagy in CRC cells pointing to a unique feature of obatoclax regarding autophagy regulation. As shown in Fig. 1 b, immunoblotting reveals a massive obatoclax induced accumulation of LC3 in both cell lines, as well as an increased conversion from LC3I to LC3II. This effect is already induced by sublethal doses. In addition, we observed p62 accumulation in cells treated with obatoclax. Collectively, the coinciding accumulation of LC3II and p62 indicates a late stage autophagy inhibition by obatoclax.

Next, we sought to explore whether the impact of obatoclax on autophagy relevant proteins is limited to the protein level. Q-RT PCR revealed an increase of LC3 mRNA transcription in obatoclax treated cells (Fig. 1 c). This effect holds true under starvation.

Obatoclax is a late stage autophagy inhibitor in CRC cells

In order to validate our observations made by immunoblotting and to investigate the subcellular distribution of autophagy relevant proteins, we performed immunohistochemistry of cells treated with obatoclax. Two different cell growth conditions were applied to study LC3 and p62 in obatoclax treated CRC cells. First, we seeded and cultured HT29 on glass slides and applied obatoclax treatment for 24 h. In mock treated control cells, there was only a marginal amount of LC3 detectable. In line with our findings from western blots, we observed a striking accumulation of LC3 in cells treated with obatoclax (Fig. 2 a, right). P62 staining revealed ubiquitous expression in control cells. The staining was cytosolic and homogeneous in a granular fashion. In comparison, obatoclax treatment caused a much more intense staining with emphasized large granules (Fig. 2 a, left).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Autophagy regulation by Obatoclax in 3D long term cell culture. a HT29 cells were seeded on glass slides, grown for 7 days and treated with 0.25 μM obatoclax. Immunhistochemical staining was done for p62 and LC3b. b HT29 cells in scaffolds after 7 days treatment with obatoclax. Immunhistochemical staining for p62 and LC3b. Representative pictures for at least 3 experiments are shown. Scale bar indicates 200 μm for longitudinal sections and 50 μM for corresponding insets. DMSO served as vehicle

3D polystyrene scaffolds foster cell-cell-interaction mimicking tissue growth. Furthermore long-time studies are feasible within this in vitro system. In line with our earlier reports, obatoclax reduced cell growth and decelerated migration (data not shown). LC3 was not detectable in untreated control cells but showed massive accumulation after long term obatoclax treatment. In sections of polystyrene scaffolds p62 showed a weak expression in mock treated cells. By contrast, strong cytosolic signal for p62 was detected in cells after 7 days of obatoclax treatment (Fig. 2 b). In summary, these observations point towards a swift but sustained late stage autophagy blockade.

In order to visualize the autophagic flux in cells treated with obatoclax, we applied acridine orange (AO) staining. In untreated cells the unprotonated form of AO shows a homogeneous cytosolic distribution (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Under obatoclax treatment, the protonated form becomes visible in a granular stain with a predominantly perinuclear localization. This observation augments our hypothesis that autophagosomes are built and formed but not degraded anymore in cells treated with obatoclax (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

CQ has been introduced as a model agent for autophagy inhibition (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We stained obatoclax and CQ treated HT29 cells with a fluorophore labeled antibody against LC3. Mock treated cells showed virtually no positivity for LC3. In comparison to CQ, obatoclax caused a much more intense fluorescence signal by means of cytosolic LC3 puncta (Fig. 3 a and b, p < 0.001).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

LC3 accumulates in autophagosomes in cells treated with Obatoclax. a Immunofluorescence staining for LC3 in untreated (upper panel), Chloroquine treated (30 μM, middle panel) and obatoclax treated (0.25 μM, lower panel) cells. Representative pictures are shown. Assays were done at least three times. b Analysis of LC3 aggregates per cell. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *** = p < 0.001

Obatoclax blocks autophagy independently of Beclin-1, Atg7 and Atg12

Autophagy related gene (Atg) 7 and Atg12 mediate important early steps during the formation of the autophagosome downstream of Beclin-1. In untreated cells, siRNA mediated downregulation of Atg7 or Atg12 prevents LC3 conversion, leading to an accumulation of the soluble LC3I form. Nevertheless, the obatoclax-induced increase of LC3II was unaltered after Atg7 or Atg12 knockdown. Of note, p62 expression is weaker in obatoclax treated cells after Atg7 knockdown (Fig. 4 a). The independence of obatoclax effects from Atg7 and Atg12 held true for cells under fully supplemented and starving conditions.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Obatoclax blocks autophagy independent of canonical autophagy signaling. a and b Representative western blotting for HT29 cells treated with obatoclax. siRNA mediated knockdown of Atg12 and Atg7 is shown in (a), siRNA mediated knockdown of Mcl-1 or Beclin-1 is shown in (b). c Flow cytometric analysis for apoptosis induction in full supplemented (left) or starving (right) HT29 cells after knockdown of Atg7 or Beclin-1 and treatment with obatoclax. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Staurosporine 2 μM for 2 h served as a positive control for cell death induction

Beclin-1 is a central pro-autophagic protein involved in early autophagosome biogenesis. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that Beclin-1 interacts with antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, representing a key switch between apoptosis and autophagy signaling. We therefore decided to investigate the role of Beclin-1 for the autophagy inhibition caused by obatoclax. siRNA mediated knockdown of Beclin-1 led to high expression of LC3I. The conversion from LC3I to LC3II was insufficient after knockdown of Beclin-1 (Fig. 4 b). Furthermore, we did not observe an accumulation of p62. The described pattern of autophagy relevant proteins is indicative for an early block of autophagy caused by downregulation of Beclin-1 (Fig. 4 b). Impressively, obatoclax treatment led to a massive accumulation of both, p62 and LC3II, even after knockdown of Beclin-1.

We showed a starvation-dependent cell death induction caused by obatoclax in SW480 cells (Fig. 1). However, we further investigated cell death under obatoclax treatment after knockdown of Atg7 and Beclin-1. We observed an unchanged cell death induction pattern in cells treated with obatoclax after RNAi mediated knockdown of either Atg7 or Beclin-1 (Fig. 4 c).

Mcl-1 is a regulator of autophagy in colorectal cancer cells

Since we could show that ABT-737 failed to interfere with autophagy (Fig. 1), we further focused on Mcl-1 and investigated its role in autophagy and its importance for the effects of obatoclax. A siRNA mediated knockdown of Mcl-1 did not influence autophagy signaling as shown by an unchanged expression of LC3I and LC3II as well as p62 in untreated cells (Fig. 4 b). Intriguingly, knockdown of Mcl-1 led to an impaired autophagy inhibition in HT29 cells, treated with obatoclax. The impaired effectiveness of obatoclax on autophagy becomes obvious in a decreased expression of LC3I and a reduced conversion from LC3I to LC3II (Fig. 4 b).

Discussion

Autophagy has a decent role in colorectal organogenesis, mucosal homeostasis and disease development. In colorectal cancer onset, autophagy plays a protective role for cancer cells by means of energy delivery. However, targeting autophagy has been recently discovered as promising and novel treatment approach [9, 36]. Autophagy is regulated by a tightly balanced signaling network of enormous complexity. Within the autophagy signaling network, crosstalks with classical apoptosis pathways have been identified [37, 38]. For instance, Bcl-2, an important antiapoptotic protein, binds proautophagic Beclin-1 thereby inhibiting autophagy [20, 39].

First, we explored the potential impact of autophagy inhibition in CRC cells. The malaria drug chloroquine inhibits the execution of autophagy at a late stage via an elusive mechanism [40]. Our data indicates that CQ is an effective autophagy inhibitor in CRC cells. A moderate apoptosis induction by CQ is massively augmented in cells under starvation. Hypoxia and direct autophagy induction via Staurosporine failed to regulate autophagy. This observation argues for a pivotal role of autophagy and substantiates our hypothesis that inhibition of autophagy can trigger apoptosis induction in CRC.

In our present study, we sought to investigate the role of Bcl-2 inhibition for autophagy. There are various small molecules available, mimicking proapoptotic proteins, which may lead to apoptosis induction. We have recently shown that the pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor obatoclax blocks invasiveness of colorectal cancer cells and causes cell cycle arrest in G1-Phase [21]. Furthermore our earlier studies demonstrated that Mcl-1 sparing ABT737 but not obatoclax induced apoptotic cell death in CRC cells. Here, we show that cell growth inhibition as well as cell death induction caused by obatoclax is profoundly augmented when cells are challenged by starvation. The degree of cell death induction and the subtype of death in this context depend on the cell type. HT29 compared to SW480 cells are likely to die through necroptosis rather than apoptosis [41].

This observation suggests a major role of autophagy, since it becomes crucial for cell survival and growth in stressful situations. Immunoblotting showed a massive upregulation of LC3 on the protein level and an increased shift from LC3I to the activated and membrane bound form LC3II. The increase of LC3 was accompanied by an accumulation of p62, a scaffold protein of autophagic vesicles, in cells treated with obatoclax. This protein pattern is indicative for a late stage inhibition of autophagy, because high levels of LC3 indicate an increased autophagy flux whereas high levels of p62 occur in case of a disrupted enzymatic degradation of autophagosome cargo [30]. The similarity of the expression pattern of p62 and LC3 under obatoclax and CQ treatment further argues in favor of a late stage autophagy inhibition induced by obatoclax.

Interestingly, LC3 is not only upregulated on the protein level. On the transcriptional level we observed an upregulation of LC3 mRNA. Little is known regarding transcriptional regulation of autophagy. LC3 mRNA is upregulated upon obatoclax treatment and, to an even greater extent, in starved cells. Even not fully understood yet, transcriptional regulation has recently moved into research focus [42, 43] The transcription factor E2F has been shown to be a mediator of LC3 upregulation [44]. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, there is some evidence for an involvement of the JNK-pathway in LC3 transcription [45]. Nevertheless, the presented experimental set up is unable to distinguish between a compensatory upregulation as a consequence of an autophagy blockade or a direct impact of obatoclax on transcription.

Subcellular localization of LC3 and the cytosolic LC3I/II ratio has been widely used to visualize and quantify autophagy [46, 47]. Nevertheless, choosing the right assay to monitor and asses autophagy has been a matter of debate [30, 48, 49]. We applied immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy to analyze subcellular distribution of autophagy proteins p62 and LC3. Staining for LC3 revealed a weak expression in CRC cells in full supplemented conditions. Upon obatoclax treatment, a fundamental increase of LC3 can be observed in a homogenous cytosolic and nucleic fashion. The translocation of LC3 to the nucleus as well as its interactions with nucleic proteins has been recently described. Solely the cytosolic fraction of LC3 after lipidization mediates autophagy initiation, whereas the biological relevance of nucleic LC3 remains elusive [49]. Immunofluorescence for LC3 showed a strong expression but rather perinucleic distribution after obatoclax treatment.

P62 is a scaffold protein involved in a variety of cellular processes including NF-kB-signaling [31, 50, 51]. Recently, a correlation of p62 expression with clinicopathologic parameters has been shown for prostate cancer and gastrointestinal carcinoma [52, 53]. Under obatoclax treatment we observe an accumulation of p62, which is indicative for a late stage autophagy inhibition, since the scaffold protein is trapped in the autophagic vesicle.

This hypothesis is underpinned by our immunohistochemical findings. Indeed, control cells showed a homogenous cytosolic staining, turning into a granular stain upon obatoclax treatment. Since the specificity of p62 for autophagy is limited, an interaction of obatoclax with NF-kB signaling or oxygen signaling should be addressed in future studies [31, 54].

The decent mechanism by which obatoclax regulates autophagy remains elusive. Here, we show that obatoclax is capable of modulating autophagy even in the absence of Beclin-1. Autophagy initiation is crucially regulated by Beclin-1 [39, 55]. We observed that obatoclax treatment caused LC3 accumulation in CRC cells after Beclin-1 knockdown to the same extent as in control cells. Beclin-1’s interactions with Bcl-2 proteins have been reported to play a role in autophagy regulation [56, 57].

Obatoclax seems to interfere with autophagy independently of the Beclin-1 complex. Therefore we further investigated autophagy relevant proteins with regard to implications for obatoclax. Atg7 belongs to the ubiquitin like conjugation system (E1-like enzyme) mediating early steps of phagophore formation. Atg12 is conjugated to Atg5 and plays an important role in the conjugation of LC3 to phosphatidylethanolamine (E3-like enzyme) [58, 59]. Strikingly, RNA interference leading to a knockdown of the respective protein (Atg7 and Atg12) left LC3 activation unaltered. Taken together, our data indicate a regulative impact of obatoclax on autophagy independently of the cascaded and canonical autophagy pathway. By contrast, others reported Beclin-1 and Atg5 dependent effects of obatoclax [59]. Liang and coworkers propose an autophagy inducing effect of obatoclax, which cannot be confirmed by our data. In line with our presented findings in colorectal cancer, a Cathepsin dependent inhibition of autophagosomal lysis by obatoclax has been reported in breast cancer [60]. Interestingly, knockout of Atg7 abolished LC3 processing but failed to prevent obatoclax induced death in lung cancer cells [61]. Furthermore, obatoclax has been recently linked to the emerging concept of necroptosis [62]. In addition, endoplasmatic reticulum stress and reactive oxygen species may contribute to obatoclax effects [63, 64].

Next, we decided to investigate Mcl-1 in the context of obatoclax and autophagy, since Mcl-1 sparing ABT737 failed to inhibit autophagy. The interaction of Mcl-1 and Beclin-1 is crucial for chemotherapy resistance in leukemic B cells [65]. Mcl-1 has been described as key factor for a governed resistance towards obatoclax [66]. Interestingly, knockdown of Mcl-1 markedly suppressed LC3I level and decreased the LC3I/II ratio in cells treated with obatoclax. A regulatory role of Mcl-1 in autophagy signaling has not yet been described mechanistically and deserves further attention.

Conclusion

In summary, our data prove that autophagy inhibition represents a potent approach to inhibit CRC cell growth in starving conditions reflecting a common phenomenon in growing tumor tissues. Furthermore, we demonstrate that pan-Bcl-2 inhibition by obatoclax utilizes autophagy inhibition as a main effector. This late stage autophagy inhibition is independent of canonical autophagy signaling pathways. Finally, our data indicate a decisive role of Mcl-1 in autophagy regulation, which needs further attention in future studies.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine VI, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
(2)
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
(3)
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
(4)
Department of Internal Medicine II, Marien-Hospital, Wesel, Germany

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(19):1845–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Huett A, Xavier RJ. Autophagy at the gut interface: mucosal responses to stress and the consequences for inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(1):152–74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lai K, Killingsworth MC, Lee CS. The significance of autophagy in colorectal cancer pathogenesis and implications for therapy. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(10):854–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo JY, Xia B, White E. Autophagy-mediated tumor promotion. Cell. 2013;155(6):1216–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kroemer G. Autophagy: a druggable process that is deregulated in aging and human disease. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):1–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang X, Overholtzer M, Thompson CB. Autophagy in cellular metabolism and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):47–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mani J, Vallo S, Rakel S, Antonietti P, Gessler F, Blaheta R, et al. Chemoresistance is associated with increased cytoprotective autophagy and diminished apoptosis in bladder cancer cells treated with the BH3 mimetic (−)-Gossypol (AT-101). BMC Cancer. 2015;15:224.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. White E. The role for autophagy in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):42–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sui X, Chen R, Wang Z, Huang Z, Kong N, Zhang M, et al. Autophagy and chemotherapy resistance: a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Cell death & disease. 2013;4:e838.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(10):714–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg SB, Supko JG, Neal JW, Muzikansky A, Digumarthy S, Fidias P, et al. A phase I study of erlotinib and hydroxychloroquine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(10):1602–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tang Y, Li M, Wang YL, Threadgill MD, Xiao M, Mou CF, et al. ART1 promotes starvation-induced autophagy: a possible protective role in the development of colon carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(2):498–513.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu F, Wei F, Wang Y, Wu B, Fang Y, Xiong B. EGCG synergizes the therapeutic effect of cisplatin and oxaliplatin through autophagic pathway in human colorectal cancer cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 2015;128(1):27–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhai H, Fesler A, Ba Y, Wu S, Ju J. Inhibition of colorectal cancer stem cell survival and invasive potential by hsa-miR-140-5p mediated suppression of Smad2 and autophagy. Oncotarget. 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly PN, Strasser A. The role of Bcl-2 and its pro-survival relatives in tumourigenesis and cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(9):1414–24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koehler BC, Jager D, Schulze-Bergkamen H. Targeting cell death signaling in colorectal cancer: current strategies and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(8):1923–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vela L, Marzo I. Bcl-2 family of proteins as drug targets for cancer chemotherapy: the long way of BH3 mimetics from bench to bedside. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;23:74–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang YJ, Lu MK, Guan KL. The TSC1 and TSC2 tumor suppressors are required for proper ER stress response and protect cells from ER stress-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(1):133–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu LL, Cheng Y, Liu B. Beclin-1: autophagic regulator and therapeutic target in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(5):921–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koehler BC, Scherr AL, Lorenz S, Elssner C, Kautz N, Welte S, et al. Pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor obatoclax delays cell cycle progression and blocks migration of colorectal cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e106571.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Basit F, Cristofanon S, Fulda S. Obatoclax (GX15-070) triggers necroptosis by promoting the assembly of the necrosome on autophagosomal membranes. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(9):1161–73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yazbeck VY, Li C, Grandis JR, Zang Y, Johnson DE. Single-agent obatoclax (GX15-070) potently induces apoptosis and pro-survival autophagy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(2):120–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koehler BC, Scherr AL, Lorenz S, Urbanik T, Kautz N, Elssner C, et al. Beyond cell death - antiapoptotic bcl-2 proteins regulate migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76446.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Koehler BC, Urbanik T, Vick B, Boger RJ, Heeger S, Galle PR, et al. TRAIL-induced apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells is augmented by targeted therapies. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(47):5924–35.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo S, Liang Y, Murphy SF, Huang A, Shen H, Kelly DF, et al. A rapid and high content assay that measures cyto-ID-stained autophagic compartments and estimates autophagy flux with potential clinical applications. Autophagy. 2015;11(3):560–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimaldi A, Santini D, Zappavigna S, Lombardi A, Misso G, Boccellino M, et al. Antagonistic effects of chloroquine on autophagy occurrence potentiate the anticancer effects of everolimus on renal cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(4):567–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fukuda T, Oda K, Wada-Hiraike O, Sone K, Inaba K, Ikeda Y, et al. The anti-malarial chloroquine suppresses proliferation and overcomes cisplatin resistance of endometrial cancer cells via autophagy inhibition. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(3):538–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wild P, McEwan DG, Dikic I. The LC3 interactome at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 1):3–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy. 2007;3(6):542–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Moscat J, Diaz-Meco MT. p62: a versatile multitasker takes on cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(6):230–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Komatsu M, Ichimura Y. Physiological significance of selective degradation of p62 by autophagy. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(7):1374–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierzynska-Mach A, Janowski PA, Dobrucki JW. Evaluation of acridine orange, LysoTracker Red, and quinacrine as fluorescent probes for long-term tracking of acidic vesicles. Cytometry A. 2014;85(8):729–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreno A, SantoDomingo J, Fonteriz RI, Lobaton CD, Montero M, Alvarez J. A confocal study on the visualization of chromaffin cell secretory vesicles with fluorescent targeted probes and acidic dyes. J Struct Biol. 2010;172(3):261–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Millot C, Millot JM, Morjani H, Desplaces A, Manfait M. Characterization of acidic vesicles in multidrug-resistant and sensitive cancer cells by acridine orange staining and confocal microspectrofluorometry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45(9):1255–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. White E. Deconvoluting the context-dependent role for autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(6):401–10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mukhopadhyay S, Panda PK, Sinha N, Das DN, Bhutia SK. Autophagy and apoptosis: where do they meet? Apoptosis. 2014;19(4):555–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nikoletopoulou V, Markaki M, Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N. Crosstalk between apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(12):3448–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(4):571–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimura T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Isaka Y. Chloroquine in cancer therapy: a double-edged sword of autophagy. Cancer Res. 2013;73(1):3–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson CA, Browning JL. Death of HT29 adenocarcinoma cells induced by TNF family receptor activation is caspase-independent and displays features of both apoptosis and necrosis. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9(12):1321–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Perera RM, Stoykova S, Nicolay BN, Ross KN, Fitamant J, Boukhali M, et al. Transcriptional control of autophagy-lysosome function drives pancreatic cancer metabolism. Nature. 2015;524(7565):361–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang Z, Guo M, Zhao S, Xu W, Shao J, Zhang F, et al. The update on transcriptional regulation of autophagy in normal and pathologic cells: A novel therapeutic target. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;74:17–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Polager S, Ofir M, Ginsberg D. E2F1 regulates autophagy and the transcription of autophagy genes. Oncogene. 2008;27(35):4860–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun T, Li D, Wang L, Xia L, Ma J, Guan Z, et al. c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation is essential for up-regulation of LC3 during ceramide-induced autophagy in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J Transl Med. 2011;9:161.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kadowaki M, Karim MR. Cytosolic LC3 ratio as a quantitative index of macroautophagy. Methods Enzymol. 2009;452:199–213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Drake KR, Kang M, Kenworthy AK. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution and dynamics of the autophagosome marker EGFP-LC3. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3):e9806.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Bai H, Inoue J, Kawano T, Inazawa J. A transcriptional variant of the LC3A gene is involved in autophagy and frequently inactivated in human cancers. Oncogene. 2012;31(40):4397–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes. Autophagy. 2008;4(2):151–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Su J, Liu F, Xia M, Xu Y, Li X, Kang J, et al. p62 participates in the inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling and apoptosis induced by sulfasalazine in human glioma U251 cells. Oncol Rep. 2015;34(1):235–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Jain A, Rusten TE, Katheder N, Elvenes J, Bruun JA, Sjottem E, et al. p62/Sequestosome-1, Autophagy-related Gene 8, and Autophagy in Drosophila Are Regulated by Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-related Factor 2 (NRF2), Independent of Transcription Factor TFEB. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(24):14945–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mohamed A, Ayman A, Deniece J, Wang T, Kovach C, Siddiqui MT, et al. P62/Ubiquitin IHC Expression Correlated with Clinicopathologic Parameters and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Carcinomas. Frontiers in Oncology. 2015;5:70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Burdelski C, Reiswich V, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Minner S, Koop C, et al. Cytoplasmic Accumulation of Sequestosome 1 (p62) Is a Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence, Rapid Tumor Cell Proliferation, and Genomic Instability in Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;15(21):3471–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Shen Y, Yang J, Zhao J, Xiao C, Xu C, Xiang Y. The switch from ER stress-induced apoptosis to autophagy via ROS-mediated JNK/p62 signals: A survival mechanism in methotrexate-resistant choriocarcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2015;334(2):207–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Funderburk SF, Wang QJ, Yue Z. The Beclin 1-VPS34 complex--at the crossroads of autophagy and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20(6):355–62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Erlich S, Mizrachy L, Segev O, Lindenboim L, Zmira O, Adi-Harel S, et al. Differential interactions between Beclin 1 and Bcl-2 family members. Autophagy. 2007;3(6):561–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Maiuri MC, Criollo A, Tasdemir E, Vicencio JM, Tajeddine N, Hickman JA, et al. BH3-only proteins and BH3 mimetics induce autophagy by competitively disrupting the interaction between Beclin 1 and Bcl-2/Bcl-X(L). Autophagy. 2007;3(4):374–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Mehrpour M, Esclatine A, Beau I, Codogno P. Overview of macroautophagy regulation in mammalian cells. Cell Res. 2010;20(7):748–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tanida I. Autophagy basics. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55(1):1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz-Roberts JL, Shajahan AN, Cook KL, Warri A, Abu-Asab M, Clarke R. GX15-070 (obatoclax) induces apoptosis and inhibits cathepsin D- and L-mediated autophagosomal lysis in antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(4):448–59.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. McCoy F, Hurwitz J, McTavish N, Paul I, Barnes C, O’Hagan B, et al. Obatoclax induces Atg7-dependent autophagy independent of beclin-1 and BAX/BAK. Cell death & disease. 2010;1:e108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Bonapace L, Bornhauser BC, Schmitz M, Cario G, Ziegler U, Niggli FK, et al. Induction of autophagy-dependent necroptosis is required for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells to overcome glucocorticoid resistance. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(4):1310–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wroblewski D, Jiang CC, Croft A, Farrelly ML, Zhang XD, Hersey P. OBATOCLAX and ABT-737 induce ER stress responses in human melanoma cells that limit induction of apoptosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12), e84073.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lagadinou ED, Sach A, Callahan K, Rossi RM, Neering SJ, Minhajuddin M, et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(3):329–41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma A, Singh K, Mazumder S, Hill BT, Kalaycio M, Almasan A. BECN1 and BIM interactions with MCL-1 determine fludarabine resistance in leukemic B cells. Cell death & disease. 2013;4:e628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Cruickshanks N, Hamed HA, Bareford MD, Poklepovic A, Fisher PB, Grant S, et al. Lapatinib and obatoclax kill tumor cells through blockade of ERBB1/3/4 and through inhibition of BCL-XL and MCL-1. Mol Pharmacol. 2012;81(5):748–58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Koehler et al. 2015

Advertisement