Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Relationship between body mass index and the expression of hormone receptors or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 with respect to breast cancer survival

  • Ye Won Jeon1,
  • Su Hwan Kang2,
  • Min Ho Park3,
  • Woosung Lim4,
  • Se Heun Cho5 and
  • Young Jin Suh1Email author
BMC Cancer201515:865

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1879-4

Received: 14 October 2014

Accepted: 30 October 2015

Published: 6 November 2015

Abstract

Background

The association between body mass index (BMI) at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains controversial. Furthermore, the association between BMI and prognosis with respect to different breast cancer subtypes is not clearly defined.

Methods

We analyzed data from 41,021 invasive breast cancer patients between January 1988 and February 2008 from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR) database. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox’s proportional hazard regression model among all patients and specific breast cancer subtypes with respect to BMI categories.

Results

A U-shaped association between BMI and mortality was observed in the total cohort. Underweight and obese individuals exhibited worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95 % confidence interval {CI}, 1.05 to 1.44] and 1.29 [1.13 to 1.48], respectively) and BCSS (1.26 [1.03 to 1.54] and 1.21 [1.02 to 1.43], respectively) than normal-weight individuals. In the estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) - subgroup, obese individuals exhibited worse OS (1.48 [1.18 to 1.85]) and BCSS (1.31 [1.13 to 1.52]) than normal-weight individuals. Conversely, in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup, underweight individuals exhibited worse OS (1.68 [1.12 to 2.47]) and BCSS (1.79 [1.11 to 2.90]) than normal-weight individuals.

Conclusions

We observed a U-shaped relationship between BMI at diagnosis and poor OS and BCSS among all breast cancer patients. However, obesity in the ER and/or PR+/HER2- subgroup and underweight in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup were poor prognostic factors. Therefore, BMI at diagnosis and breast cancer subtype should be considered simultaneously in various treatment decision processes and surveillance schedules.

Keywords

Breast neoplasmsBody mass indexSurvivalEstrogen receptorProgesterone receptorHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2

Background

The association between body mass index (BMI) at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains controversial despite many studies, including single institution, multi-center, and population-based studies, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials [124]. In many studies, a high BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis has been identified as a negative prognostic factor [117]. However, several studies have suggested that a low BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis correlates with a negative prognosis in breast cancer patients [1820]. Some investigators have reported a weak or no relationship between BMI and prognosis in breast cancer patients [2124].

Previous studies have not adequately demonstrated an association between BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in breast cancer patients with respect to breast cancer subtypes. Recent advances in our understanding of breast cancer biology based on molecular techniques allow us to divide breast cancer into at least four subtypes [25, 26]. These breast cancer subtypes exhibit different prognoses according to the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressions. Therefore, it is important to understand the association between BMI and prognosis in the different breast cancer subtypes.

Moreover, there are certain differences between Asian and Western regions with respect to the prevalence of obesity. Although the prevalence of obesity is lower in Asians, the health risks associated with obesity occur at a lower BMI in Asian populations [2729]. Therefore, an analysis of a large population-based cohort is needed to understand the prognostic significance of obesity in Asian breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in all breast cancer patients and in each breast cancer subtype by analyzing overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using population-based data from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR) database.

Methods

Korean breast cancer registry (KBCR)

The KBCR database is a web-based, prospectively maintained nationwide database managed by the Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS). One hundred and two institutions have voluntarily participated in this registry since 1997. Before inserting personal information along with various datasets, written informed consent should be mandatory from the patient. From the initial conception of KBCR database, principal investigators from every single institution have agreed on the principles and process of utilizing this database for research purposes. After 2000, an online registration program was implemented, and the database has been actively utilized for various research studies on breast cancer in Korea [18, 30]. Essential registry items include the patient’s unique Korean resident registration number, gender, age, the surgical method used, and cancer stage according to the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer classification [31]. Moreover, data on height, weight, biological status (such as ER, PR, HER2, p53, and Ki67 status), and adjuvant treatment (such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy) are collected as optional items within the KBCR database. The Korean Central Cancer Registry provides mortality data only, and the KBCR does not include information on tumor recurrence.

According to the guidelines of utilizing KBCR database, this study was approved by the institutional Review Board (IRB) of St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, where the first author of this article is affiliated (VC14RISI0234).

Patients and follow-up

In this study, we selected and assessed invasive breast cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between January 1988 and February 2008. To achieve a more accurate analysis, we excluded patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and patients for whom essential registry data (gender, age, height, weight and cancer stage) and ER/PR status were not available. Patients with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis were excluded, because distant metastasis is the worst prognostic factor compared with other prognostic factors (such as age, tumor size, histologic grade, lymph node status, adjuvant treatment, BMI, hormone receptor status and HER2 expression) and serves as confounding factor for survival analysis.

The data on the remaining 41,021 patients were included in the final analysis.

All patients were categorized into five subgroups according to the expression of ER, PR and HER2 as follows: (a) ER and/or PR+/HER2-; (b) ER and/or PR+/HER2+; (c) ER and PR-/HER2+; (d) ER and PR-/HER2-; and (e) unknown. All patients for whom ER/PR expression but not HER2 expression information was available were categorized into the unknown group.

Positive staining for ER or PR was defined as the positive staining of ≥10 % nuclei in ten high-power fields, and HER2 positivity was defined as 3+ immunohistochemical (IHC) staining or HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Cases of 2+ HER2 by IHC without a FISH result were treated as HER2-negative.

Patient survival data, including the date and cause of death, were obtained from the Korean Central Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea.

Statistical analysis

BMI was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by height (m) squared. The BMI at diagnosis was categorized as normal BMI (18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2), underweight BMI (<18.5 kg/m2), overweight BMI (25.0 – 29.9 kg/m2) and obese BMI (≥30 kg/m2) according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) [32].

The patient characteristics were compared with respect to BMI category (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese) using the chi-square test. The chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine differences in the clinicopathological features between groups. With respect to survival analyses, we explored OS and BCSS using data from the KBCR database. OS was defined as the time from the initial diagnosis of primary breast cancer to death from any cause. BCSS was defined as survival until death from breast cancer. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were performed for the comparison of survival curves. Multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox’s proportional-hazard regression models to study the effect of BMI at diagnosis on OS and BCSS. The parameters included in the multivariate analysis model were as follows: patient age; tumor size; histologic grade; lymph node status; operation method; adjuvant treatment; ER/PR status and HER2 expression. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software for Windows (release 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

For the 41,021 patients included in our analysis, the mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 48 years (range, 18 to 93). The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1, stratified according to BMI categories. The BMI categories revealed a significant association with known breast cancer prognostic factors. The median age at diagnosis for obese patients was significantly older than underweight patients (p < 0.001). Obese patients had larger tumors (p < 0.001), high frequencies of axillary lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), histologically high-grade lesions (p = 0.003), and negative ER and PR (p = 0.002) and HER2 expression (p = 0.004) compared with underweight patients.
Table 1

General characteristics of KBCS breast cancer subjects, overall and by BMI categories

Characteristic

Overall

Underweight BMI

Normal BMI

Overweight BMI

Obese BMI

p value

<18.5 kg/m2

18.5-24.9 kg/m2

25-29.9 kg/m2

≥30 kg/m2

No. of subjects

41021

1387

27519

10483

1632

 

Age (years)

      

 mean(SD)

48(10)

42(10)

47(10)

52(10)

53(11)

<0.0001

 Median(Range)

47(18-93)

41(19-87)

46(18-93)

51(19-90)

53(22-87)

 

 ≤ 35

3737(9.11)

390(28.12)

2793(10.15)

483(4.61)

71(4.35)

<0.0001

 > 35

37284(90.89)

997(71.88)

24726(89.85)

10000(95.39)

1561(95.65)

 

Tumor size (cm)

      

 0 - 2

21931(53.46)

827(59.63)

15331(55.71)

5083(48.49)

690(42.28)

<0.0001

 > 2

19090(46.54)

560(40.37)

12188(44.29)

5400(51.51)

942(57.72)

 

Axillary lymph node metastasis

      

 Negative

25205(61.44)

916(66.04)

17205(62.52)

6153(58.70)

931(57.05)

<0.0001

 Positive

15816(38.56)

471(33.96)

10314(37.48)

4330(41.30)

701(42.95)

 

Operation method

      

 Mastectomy

23362(56.95)

759(54.72)

15361(55.82)

6254(59.66)

988(60.54)

<0.0001

 Conserving surgery

17659(43.05)

628(45.28)

12158(44.18)

4229(40.34)

644(39.46)

 

ER/PR expression

      

 ER and/or PR Positive

28166(68.66)

970(69.94)

19065(69.28)

7040(67.16)

1091(66.85)

0.0002

 ER and PR Negative

12855(31.34)

417(30.06)

8454(30.72)

3443(32.84)

541(33.15)

 

HER 2 expression

      

 Negative

28530(69.55)

955(68.85)

18995(69.03)

7401(70.60)

1179(72.24)

0.0004

 Positive

8005(19.51)

265(19.11)

5541(20.14)

1917(18.29)

282(17.28)

 

 Unknown

4486(10.94)

167(12.04)

2983(10.84)

1165(11.11)

171(10.48)

 

Subtype

      

 ER and/or PR + and HER 2 -

21094(51.42)

706(50.90)

14179(51.52)

5363(51.16)

846(51.84)

<0.0001

 ER and/or PR + and HER 2 +

4118(10.04)

144(10.38)

2909(10.57)

929(8.86)

136(8.33)

 

 ER and PR - and HER 2 +

3887(9.48)

121(8.72)

2632(9.56)

988(9.42)

146(8.95)

 

 ER and PR - and HER 2 - -

7436(18.13)

249(17.95)

4816(17.50)

2038(19.44)

333(20.40)

 

 Unknown

4486(10.94)

167(12.04)

2983(10.84)

1165(11.11)

171(10.48)

 

Histologic grade

      

 Low (grade1 - 2)

20043(48.86)

690(49.75)

13495(49.04)

5050(48.17)

808(49.51)

0.0032

 High (Grade 3)

15890(38.74)

498(35.90)

10560(38.37)

4186(39.93)

646(39.58)

 

 Unknown

5088(12.4)

199(14.35)

3464(12.59)

1247(11.90)

178(10.91)

 

Adjuvant chemotherapy

      

 Yes

28812(70.24)

891(64.24)

19289(70.09)

7477(71.33)

1155(70.77)

<0.0001

 No

9682(23.6)

409(29.49)

6578(23.90)

2320(22.13)

375(22.98)

 

 Unknown

2527(6.16)

87(6.27)

1652(6.00)

686(6.54)

102(6.25)

 

Adjuvant hormonal

      

 Yes

26265(64.03)

856(61.72)

17723(64.40)

6651(63.45)

1035(63.42)

0.2424

 No

12782(31.16)

463(33.38)

8501(30.89)

3300(31.48)

518(31.74)

 

 Unknown

1974(4.81)

68(4.90)

1295(4.71)

532(5.07)

79(4.84)

 

Breast cancer subgroups categorized according to the expression of ER, PR and HER2 exhibited a significant association with BMI categories (p < 0.001). The ER and/or PR+/HER2- and ER and PR-/HER2- subtypes were more prevalent in the obese BMI category. However, the ER and/or PR+/HER2+ subtype was more prevalent in the underweight BMI category.

Overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival

A total of 4468 deaths from any cause and 2824 deaths from breast cancer were observed over a median follow-up time of 92 months after diagnosis, with a maximum follow-up of 300 months.

After adjusting for poor prognostic factors, such as tumor size, axillary lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, ER, PR and HER2 expression, a U-shaped association between BMI and mortality was observed in the total cohort (Table 2). Compared with patients in the normal BMI category, those in the underweight BMI category exhibited significantly worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.44, p = 0.0118), as did those in the obese BMI category (adjusted HR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.13 to 1.48, p = 0.0002). Patients in the underweight BMI category (adjusted HR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.54, p = 0.0219) and the obese BMI category (adjusted HR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.02 to 1.43, p = 0.0321) exhibited significantly worse BCSS compared with those in the normal BMI category.
Table 2

Cox’s proportional hazard regression model for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS)

Characteristic

Overall survival

Breast cancer specific survival

 

Alive

Death

HR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjust HR (95 % CI)

p value

Alive

Death

HR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjust HR (95 % CI)

p value

No. of participants

36553

4468

    

98197

2824

    

Age (years)

            

 ≤ 35

3330(9.11)

407(9.11)

1.00

   

3479(9.11)

258(9.14)

1.00

   

 > 35

33223(90.89)

4061(90.89)

1.04(0.94-1.15)

0.4945

  

34718(90.89)

2566(90.86)

1.03(0.91-1.17)

0.6453

  

Tumor size (cm)

            

 0 - 2

20608(56.38)

1323(29.61)

1.00

 

1.00

 

21185(55.46)

746(26.42)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 > 2

15945(43.62)

3145(70.39)

2.74(2.57-2.92)

<0.0001

1.70(1.58-1.82)

<0.0001

17012(44.54)

2078(73.58)

3.16(2.91-3.44)

<0.0001

1.77(1.61-1.93)

<0.0001

Axillary lymph node metastasis

            

 Negative

23731(64.92)

1474(32.99)

1.00

 

1.00

 

24439(63.98)

766(27.12)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Positive

12822(35.08)

2994(67.01)

3.43(3.22-3.65)

<0.0001

2.95(2.75-3.16)

<0.0001

13758(36.02)

2058(72.88)

4.42(4.07-4.80)

<0.0001

3.50(3.20-3.84)

<0.0001

Operation method

            

 Mastectomy

19830(54.25)

3532(79.05)

1.00

 

1.00

 

21094(55.22)

2268(80.31)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Conserving surgery

16723(45.75)

936(20.95)

0.37(0.34-0.39)

<0.0001

0.55(0.51-0.59)

<0.0001

17103(44.78)

556(19.69)

0.34(0.31-0.37)

<0.0001

0.55(0.50-0.61)

<0.0001

ER/PR expression

            

 ER and/or PR Positive

25647(70.16)

2519(56.38)

1.00

 

1.00

 

26629(69.71)

1537(54.43)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 ER and PR Negative

10906(29.84)

1949(43.62)

1.75(1.65-1.86)

<0.0001

1.55(1.42-1.70)

<0.0001

11568(30.29)

1287(45.57)

1.87(1.73-2.01)

<0.0001

1.56(1.40-1.74)

<0.0001

HER 2 expression

            

 Negative

26098(71.40)

2432(54.43)

1.00

 

1.00

 

27018(70.73)

1512(53.54)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Positive

7040(19.26)

965(21.59)

1.42(1.32-1.53)

<0.0001

1.11(1.03-1.20)

0.0061

7402(19.38)

603(21.35)

1.41(1.29-1.55)

<0.0001

1.08(0.98-1.19)

0.1128

 Unknown

3415(9.34)

1071(23.97)

2.23(2.07-2.41)

<0.0001

1.70(1.58-1.84)

<0.0001

3777(9.89)

709(25.10)

2.45(2.23-2.68)

<0.0001

1.91(1.74-2.11)

<0.0001

BMI calssification

            

 Underweight BMI

1229(3.36)

158(3.54)

1.16(0.98-1.36)

0.0784

1.23(1.05-1.44)

0.0118

1284(3.36)

103(3.65)

1.18(0.97-1.44)

0.0974

1.26(1.03-1.54)

0.0219

 Normal BMI

24766(67.75)

2753(61.62)

1.00

 

1.00

 

25774(67.48)

1745(61.79)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

9164(25.07)

1319(29.52)

1.26(1.18-1.35)

<0.0001

1.15(1.07-1.23)

<0.0001

9651(25.27)

832(29.46)

1.25(1.15-1.36)

<0.0001

1.13(1.04-1.22)

0.0052

 Obese BMI

1394(3.81)

238(5.33)

1.51(1.32-1.72)

<0.0001

1.29(1.13-1.48)

0.0002

1488(3.90)

144(5.10)

1.42(1.19-1.68)

<0.0001

1.21(1.02-1.43)

0.0321

Histologic grade

            

 Low (grade1 - 2)

18316(50.11)

1727(38.65)

1.00

 

1.00

 

19002(49.75)

1041(36.86)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 High (Grade 3)

13631(37.29)

2259(50.56)

1.73(1.62-1.84)

<0.0001

1.32(1.23-1.41)

<0.0001

14401(37.70)

1489(52.73)

1.86(1.72-2.02)

<0.0001

1.36(1.25-1.48)

<0.0001

 Unknown

4606(12.60)

482(10.79)

1.02(0.92-1.13)

0.6849

1.04(0.94-1.15)

0.494

4794(12.55)

294(10.41)

1.04(0.92-1.19)

0.5269

1.08(0.95-1.23)

0.2561

Adjuvant chemotherapy

            

 Yes

25339(69.32)

3473(77.73)

1.00

 

1.00

 

26475(69.31)

2337(82.75)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 No

9002(24.63)

680(15.22)

0.58(0.53-0.63)

<0.0001

1.41(1.29-1.55)

<0.0001

9354(24.49)

328(11.61)

0.42(0.37-0.47)

<0.0001

1.12(0.99-1.28)

0.0753

 Unknown

2212(6.05)

315(7.05)

1.02(0.91-1.14)

0.7874

1.09(0.97-1.24)

0.1448

2368(6.20)

159(5.63)

0.75(0.64-0.88)

0.0005

0.79(0.67-0.94)

0.0062

Adjuvant hormonal

            

 Yes

23785(65.07)

2480(55.51)

1.00

 

1.00

 

24743(64.78)

1522(53.90)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 No

11000(30.09)

1782(39.88)

1.53(1.44-1.63)

<0.0001

1.07(0.98-1.17)

0.1399

11604(30.38)

1178(41.71)

1.63(1.51-1.76)

<0.0001

1.12(1.01-1.25)

0.0414

 Unknown

1768(4.84)

206(4.61)

1.13(0.98-1.30)

0.0920

1.02(0.88-1.19)

0.7627

1850(4.84)

124(4.39)

1.10(0.92-1.32)

0.3058

1.04(0.86-1.25)

0.6977

Abbreviations: OS overall survival, BCSS breast cancer specific survival, HR hazard ratio

Data presented as n (%) and HR (95 % CI)

HRs are unadjusted or adjusted based on Cox’s proportional-hazard regression models

Patient age; tumor size; histologic grade; lymph node status; operation method; adjuvant treatment; ER/PR status and HER2 expression included in the multivariate analysis model

In the ER and/or PR+/HER2- subgroup, patients in the obese BMI category exhibited significantly worse OS (adjusted HR 1.48, 95 % CI 1.18 to 1.85, p = 0.0006) and BCSS (adjusted HR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.13 to 1.52, p = 0.0003) compared with those in the normal BMI category (Table 3). However, no significant difference was observed in the OS (p = 0.1269) and BCSS (p = 0.2684) rate between patients in the normal BMI category and the underweight BMI category. Conversely, in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup, patients in the underweight BMI category exhibited significantly worse OS (adjusted HR 1.67, 95 % CI 1.12 to 2.47, p = 0.0113) and BCSS (adjusted HR 1.79, 95 % CI 1.11 to 2.90, p = 0.0179) compared with those in the normal BMI category. However, obese BMI was not associated with decreased OS (p = 0.4247) or BCSS (p = 0.5683) in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup. In the ER and/or PR+/HER2+ and ER and PR-/HER2- subgroups, BMI categories did not exhibit a significant association with OS and BCSS. In the unknown subgroup, patients in the obese BMI category exhibited significantly worse OS (adjusted HR 1.36, 95 % CI 1.04 to 1.79, p = 0.0261) but not worse BCSS (adjusted HR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.97 to 1.90, p = 0.0747) compared with those in the normal BMI category.
Table 3

Cox’s proportional hazard regression model for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) among breast cancer subtypes

Subtype

Overall survival

Breast cancer specific survival

 

Alive

Death

HR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjust HR (95 % CI)

p value

Alive

Death

HR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjust HR (95 % CI)

p value

ER and/or PR + and HER 2 -

            

 No. of participants

19674

1420

    

20248

846

    

 Underweight BMI

659(3.35)

47(3.31)

1.17(0.87-1.57)

0.2902

1.26(0.94-1.69)

0.1269

678(3.35)

28(3.31)

1.17(0.80-1.71)

0.4239

1.24(0.85-1.82)

0.2684

 Normal BMI

13352(67.87)

827(58.24)

1.00

 

1.00

 

13686(67.59)

493(58.27)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

4901(24.91)

462(32.54)

1.48(1.32-1.66)

<0.0001

1.32(1.18-1.48)

<0.0001

5084(25.11)

279(32.98)

1.49(1.29-1.73)

0.0035

1.30(0.96-1.76)

0.0874

 Obese BMI

762(3.87)

84(5.92)

1.74(1.39-2.18)

<0.0001

1.48(1.18-1.85)

0.0006

800(3.95)

46(5.44)

1.57(1.16-2.12)

<0.0001

1.31(1.13-1.52)

0.0003

ER and/or PR + and HER 2 +

            

 No. of participants

3691

427

    

3851

267

    

 Underweight BMI

130(3.52)

14(3.28)

0.95(0.56-1.62)

0.8463

1.07(0.63-1.83)

0.802

139(3.61)

5(1.87)

0.54(0.22-1.31)

0.1737

0.61(0.25-1.48)

0.2705

 Normal BMI

2612(70.77)

297(69.56)

1.00

 

1.00

 

2726(70.79)

183(68.54)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

827(22.41)

102(23.89)

1.06(0.85-1.33)

0.5960

1.02(0.81-1.28)

0.875

856(22.23)

73(27.34)

1.24(0.95-1.63)

0.1177

1.18(0.90-1.55)

0.2251

 Obese BMI

122(3.31)

14(3.28)

1.05(0.61-1.79)

0.8608

0.94(0.55-1.61)

0.8193

130(3.38)

6(2.25)

0.72(0.32-1.62)

0.4277

0.62(0.27-1.39)

0.2449

ER and PR - and HER 2 +

            

 No. of participants

3349

538

    

3551

336

    

 Underweight BMI

94(2.81)

27(5.02)

1.79(1.21-2.65)

0.0034

1.67(1.12-2.47)

0.0113

103(2.90)

18(5.36)

1.88(1.16-3.05)

0.0099

1.79(1.11-2.90)

0.0179

 Normal BMI

2288(68.32)

344(63.94)

1.00

 

1.00

 

2418(68.09)

214(63.69)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

847(25.29)

141(26.21)

1.09(0.90-1.33)

0.3926

0.94(0.77-1.14)

0.5093

900(25.34)

88(26.19)

1.09(0.85-1.40)

0.4921

0.93(0.73-1.19)

0.5715

 Obese BMI

120(3.58)

26(4.83)

1.38(0.93-2.06)

0.1132

1.18(0.79-1.76)

0.4247

130(3.66)

16(4.76)

1.35(0.81-2.24)

0.2496

1.16(0.70-1.93)

0.5683

ER and PR - and HER 2 -

            

 No. of participants

6424

1012

    

6770

666

    

 Underweight BMI

215(3.35)

34(3.36)

1.09(0.77-1.54)

0.6222

1.19(0.84-1.68)

0.3333

225(3.32)

24(3.60)

1.14(0.76-1.72)

0.5347

1.27(0.84-1.92)

0.2606

 Normal BMI

4206(65.47)

610(60.28)

1.00

 

1.00

 

4402(65.02)

414(62.16)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

1727(26.88)

311(30.73)

1.20(1.05-1.38)

0.0080

1.07(0.93-1.23)

0.3301

1849(27.31)

189(28.38)

1.07(0.90-1.27)

0.4398

0.93(0.79-1.11)

0.4320

 Obese BMI

276(4.30)

57(5.63)

1.37(1.04-1.80)

0.0234

1.18(0.90-1.55)

0.2395

294(4.34)

39(5.86)

1.38(0.99-1.91)

0.0571

1.16(0.84-1.61)

0.3749

Unknown

            

 No. of participants

3415

1071

    

3777

709

    

 Underweight BMI

131(3.84)

36(3.36)

0.98(0.70-1.37)

0.8923

1.11(0.79-1.55)

0.5528

139(3.68)

28(3.95)

1.16(0.79-1.70)

0.44

1.29(0.87-1.89)

0.2010

 Normal BMI

2308(67.58)

675(63.03)

1.00

 

1.00

 

2542(67.30)

441(62.20)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Overweight BMI

862(25.24)

303(28.29)

1.18(1.03-1.35)

0.0153

1.12(0.98-1.28)

0.1042

962(25.47)

203(28.63)

1.20(1.02-1.42)

0.0283

1.15(0.97-1.36)

0.1030

 Obese BMI

114(3.34)

57(5.32)

1.61(1.23-2.11)

0.0005

1.36(1.04-1.79)

0.0261

134(3.55)

37(5.22)

1.56(1.11-2.18)

0.0099

1.36(0.97-1.90)

0.0747

Abbreviations: OS overall survival, BCSS breast cancer specific survival, HR hazard ratio

Data presented as n (%) and HR (95 % CI)

HRs are unadjusted or adjusted based on Cox’s proportional-hazard regression models

Patient age; tumor size; histologic grade; lymph node status; operation method; adjuvant treatment; ER/PR status and HER2 expression included in the multivariate analysis model

Discussion

In our total cohort analysis, underweight and obese breast cancer patients exhibited significantly poorer OS and BCSS compared with normal BMI category breast cancer patients, suggesting a U-shaped relationship, as has been previously suggested [7, 13, 14, 17]. This is the largest study to suggest that breast cancer patients with a normal BMI range at diagnosis exhibit the most favorable breast cancer outcomes.

Similar to our finding, a previous study using the KBCR database demonstrated that underweight BMI is an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and BCSS after adjustment. However, in a previous study, neither obese patients nor overweight patients exhibited significant differences in OS and BCSS compared with normal-weight patients [18]. Two studies using the KBCR database reported different results for the prognostic significance of obesity in breast cancer patients. A potential explanation for the differing results is that more recent breast cancer patients (between 2007 and 2008) were included our study. Because an increase in overweight BMI and obesity has been noted in South Korean adults [33], our study, which included more recent breast cancer patients, may provide a more accurate analysis of the prognostic significance of obesity in Korean breast cancer patients.

This study is the first to further explore results with respect to both BMI at diagnosis and the four breast cancer subtypes, enabling better identification of women at highest risk of poor outcomes.

In the ER and/or PR+/HER2- subgroup, obese breast cancer patients exhibited significantly worse OS and BCSS compared with normal and underweight BMI breast cancer patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that obesity is associated with an increase in OS or BCSS in patients with ER and/or PR positive breast cancer but is not in patients with ER and PR negative breast cancer [1, 4, 10, 11, 14]. Several hypotheses may explain why obese patients with HR-positive breast cancer exhibit worse survival [8, 3436]. Obesity is related to the increased peripheral conversion of androgenic precursors to estradiol due to increased aromatase enzyme activity from large amounts of adipose tissue and is also related to decreased sex hormone-binding globulin [8, 34]. Additionally, obesity can increase insulin and insulin-like growth factors and obesity-related regulatory proteins, such as leptin and adiponectin [35, 36]. As a result, high circulating bioavailable estrogen, growth factors and regulatory proteins could have a carcinogenic effect, promoting tumor growth and progression, in breast cancer cells expressing the estrogen receptor.

In contrast to the ER and/or PR+/HER2- subgroup, underweight breast cancer patients exhibit significantly worse OS and BCSS compared with normal and obese BMI category breast cancer patients in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup. Recently, two studies evaluated the correlation between BMI and disease-free survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients [11, 37]. One study reported that obesity decreases survival compared with normal weight [11], but the second study reported conflicting results [37]. Because these studies were analyzed only in the context of obese versus non-obese HER2-positive patients, including ER and/or PR positive and ER and PR negative breast cancer patients in the small sample size, these studies have not demonstrated whether an underweight BMI is associated with an increased risk of mortality relative to normal weight in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup. The relationship between underweight BMI and decreased survival might be at least partly explained by the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. CTCs that have detached from the primary tumor site may reach a secondary organ and lead to metastases [38]. Furthermore, alterations of the circulating immune cells may influence tumor progression and the efficacy of systemic antitumor treatments. Chronic undernutrition and micronutrient deficiency compromise the cytokine response and affect immune cell trafficking, which might affect the tumor-immune system interaction in other organs [39].

In the ER and/or PR+/HER2+ and ER and PR-/HER2- subgroups, BMI categories did not exhibit a significant association with OS and BCSS. Similar to our finding, one study reported that obesity was not associated with decreased survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer [40]. Because the impact on BMI and breast cancer outcomes was masked by the effect of the ER and/or PR+/HER2- and ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroups, a weaker association between BMI and poor outcomes may exist in patients in the ER and/or PR+/HER2+ and ER and PR-/HER2- subgroup.

Our study has several strengths and limitations. The main strength of our study is its inclusion of a large sample (4468 deaths from any cause, 2824 deaths from breast cancer among 41,021 breast cancer patients), permitting a detailed examination across multiple BMI categories during the long follow-up period. Furthermore, our study is the first to investigate the prognostic significance of BMI in four different breast cancer subtypes. However, our study was limited by the information available in the KBCR database. First, registered patients in the KBCR database were heterogeneous with respect to breast cancer stage, IHC staining results, and presence of comorbidities. Additionally, the essential registry data (BMI and HR expression) were only available for 62.84 % of invasive breast cancer patients in the KBCR database. Therefore, the possibility of selection bias remains. Second, although total sample size is larger compared with previous studies, the sample size of underweight and obese BMI subjects is small to draw a conclusion on the independent effect of BMI. Finally, the ethnic homogeneity of the KBCR database may limit the generalizability of our finding to other racial and ethnic groups.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results indicated a U-shaped relationship between BMI at diagnosis and poor OS and BCSS among all breast cancer patients, with the lowest risk observed among breast cancer patients with normal BMIs (18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2). Among breast cancer patients with ER and/or PR+/HER2- tumors, obese individuals exhibit significantly poorer OS and BCSS, whereas among those with ER and PR-/HER2+ tumors, underweight patients exhibit significantly poorer OS and BCSS compared with breast cancer patients with normal BMIs. Although obesity and underweight BMI at diagnosis are poor prognostic factors in pooled breast cancer samples, BMI at diagnosis exhibited a different impact on breast cancer prognosis in specific breast cancer subtypes. Therefore, BMI at diagnosis and breast cancer subtype should be considered simultaneously in various treatment decision processes and surveillance schedules.

Abbreviations

HR: 

Hormone receptor

HER2: 

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

OS: 

Overall survival

BCSS: 

Breast cancer-specific survival

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

FISH: 

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

HR: 

Hazard ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Statistical analysis support was provided by the Catholic Research Coordinating Center of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project (A070001), Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

No funds were received in support of this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
(2)
Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Deagu, Republic of Korea
(3)
Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
(4)
Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University, Mokdong hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
(5)
Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Chang S, Alderfer JR, Asmar L, Buzdar AU. Inflammatory breast cancer survival: the role of obesity and menopausal status at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;64:157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berclaz G, Li S, Price KN, Coates AS, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Rudenstam CM, et al. Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group experience. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:875–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Loi S, Milne RL, Friedlander ML, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Hopper JL, et al. Obesity and outcomes in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1686–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dignam JJ, Wieand K, Johnson KA, Raich P, Anderson SJ, Somkin C, et al. Effects of obesity and race on prognosis in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;97:245–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirkan B, Alacacioglu A, Yilmaz U. Relation of body mass index (BMI) to disease free (DFS) and distant disease free survivals (DDFS) among Turkish women with operable breast carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:256–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vitolins MZ, Kimmick GG, Case LD. BMI influences prognosis following surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node positive breast cancer. Breast J. 2008;14:357–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Caan BJ, Kwan ML, Hartzell G, Castillo A, Slattery ML, Sternfeld B, et al. Pre-diagnosis body mass index, post-diagnosis weight change, and prognosis among women with early stage breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:1319–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. de Azambuja E, McCaskill-Stevens W, Francis P, Quinaux E, Crown JP, Vicente M, et al. The effect of body mass index on overall and disease-free survival in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel and doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy: the experience of the BIG 02-98 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:145–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen X, Lu W, Zheng W, Gu K, Chen Z, Zheng Y, et al. Obesity and weight change in relation to breast cancer survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122:823–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Keegan TH, Milne RL, Andrulis IL, Chang ET, Sangaramoorthy M, Phillips KA, et al. Past recreational physical activity, body size, and all-cause mortality following breast cancer diagnosis: results from the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123:531–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Sparano JA, Wang M, Zhao F, Stearns V, Martino S, Ligibel JA, et al. Obesity at diagnosis is associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:5937–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sestak I, Distler W, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Howell A, Cuzick J. Effect of body mass index on recurrences in tamoxifen and anastrozole treated women: an exploratory analysis from the ATAC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3411–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwan ML, Chen WY, Kroenke CH, Weltzien EK, Beasley JM, Nechuta SJ, et al. Pre-diagnosis body mass index and survival after breast cancer in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:729–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Conroy SM, Maskarinec G, Wilkens LR, White KK, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Obesity and breast cancer survival in ethnically diverse postmenopausal women: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:565–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu Y, Ma H, Malone KE, Norman SA, Sullivan-Halley J, Strom BL, et al. Obesity and survival among black women and white women 35 to 64 years of age at diagnosis with invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3358–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewertz M, Jensen MB, Gunnarsdóttir KÁ, Højris I, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen D, et al. Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:25–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawai M, Minami Y, Nishino Y, Fukamachi K, Ohuchi N, Kakugawa Y. Body mass index and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in Japanese women. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:149.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Moon HG, Han W, Noh DY. Underweight and breast cancer recurrence and death: a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5899–905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chauvet B, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Calais G, Panel N, Lansac J, Bougnoux P, et al. Prognostic significance of breast relapse after conservative treatment in node-negative early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19:1125–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marret H, Perrotin F, Bougnoux P, Descamps P, Hubert B, Lefranc T, et al. Low body mass index is an independent predictive factor of local recurrence after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;66:17–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Enger SM, Bernstein L. Exercise activity, body size and premenopausal breast cancer survival. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:2138–41.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Carmichael AR, Bendall S, Lockerbie L, Prescott RJ, Bates T. Does obesity compromise survival in women with breast cancer? Breast. 2004;13:93–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Niraula S, Ocana A, Ennis M, Goodwin PJ. Body size and breast cancer prognosis in relation to hormone receptor and menopausal status: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:769–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladoire S, Dalban C, Roché H, Spielmann M, Fumoleau P, Levy C, et al. Effect of obesity on disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients in a large French population: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:506–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10869–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization. Western Pacific Region, IASO International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force: The Asia Pacific perspective: Redefining obesity and its treatment. Australia: Health Communications Australia; 2000.Google Scholar
  28. Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, Deurenberg P. Elevated body fat percentage and cardiovascular risks at low body mass index levels among Singaporean Chinese, Malays and Indians. Obes Rev. 2002;3:209–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gurrici S, Hartriyanti Y, Hautvast JG, Deurenberg P. Relationship between body fat and body mass index: differences between Indonesians and Dutch Caucasians. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:779–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeon YW, Choi JE, Park HK, Kim KS, Lee JY, Suh YJ. Impact of local surgical treatment on survival in young women with T1 breast cancer: long-term results of a population-based cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:475–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  32. BMI classification [http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html]. Accessed date: 5 November 2015.
  33. Jang M, Berry D. Overweight, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in adults and children in South Korea: a review of the literature. Clin Nurs Res. 2011;20:276–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cleary MP, Grossmann ME. Minireview: obesity and breast cancer: the estrogen connection. Endocrinology. 2009;150:2537–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Papa V, Belfiore A. Insulin receptors in breast cancer: biological and clinical role. J Endocrinol Invest. 1996;19:324–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose DP, Gilhooly EM, Nixon DW. Adverse effects of obesity on breast cancer prognosis, and the biological actions of leptin (review). Int J Oncol. 2002;21:1285–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Crozier JA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Ballman KV, Dueck AC, Pockaj BA, Perez EA. Effect of body mass index on tumor characteristics and disease-free survival in patients from the HER2-positive adjuvant trastuzumab trial N9831. Cancer. 2013;119:2447–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Paget S. The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1989;8:98–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Cunningham-Rundles S, McNeeley DF, Moon A. Mechanisms of nutrient modulation of the immune response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:1119–28. quiz 1129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mowad R, Chu QD, Li BD, Burton GV, Ampil FL, Kim RH. Does obesity have an effect on outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer? J Surg Res. 2013;184:253–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jeon et al. 2015

Advertisement