Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Histopathological features predict metastatic potential in locally advanced colon carcinomas

  • Caren Jayasinghe1, 2Email author,
  • Nektaria Simiantonaki1, 3 and
  • Charles James Kirkpatrick1
BMC Cancer201515:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1013-7

Received: 27 July 2014

Accepted: 6 January 2015

Published: 21 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Metastatic dissemination can exist before a pathologically and clinically detectable manifestation. The structural heterogeneity of colon cancer (CC) in histological sections with respect to the morphology of tumor aggressiveness and composition of the tumor microenvironment raises the question of whether the microscopical tumor architecture enables a discrimination of groups with different metastatic potential. This would result in an assessment of the prognosis and provision of an ancillary tool for the therapeutic management after surgery, beside the estimation of the local tumor extent.

Methods

In order to identify predictive biomarkers for metastasis of locally advanced CC, which can easily be integrated into the pathologist’s daily routine diagnostic activity, we determined tumor budding, peritumoral inflammation, extent of desmoplasia and necrosis, density of macro- and microvascular blood vessels and functional state of lymphatics in the tumor center, invasive margin and tumor-free surrounding tissue in 86 non-metastatic, lymphogenous-metastatic and haematogenous-metastatic, subserosa-invasive CC.

Results

Features influencing nodal metastasis in the univariate analysis included high tumor budding (p = 0.004), high large vessel density in the subserosa (p = 0.043), abundant desmoplasia (p = 0.049), non-finger-like desmoplastic pattern (p = 0.051) and absent lymphocellular intratumoral inflammation (p = 0.084). In the multivariate analysis, with the exception of large vessel density, these pathomorphological features were independent risk factors for lymphogenous metastasis (p = 0.023, p = 0.017, p = 0.037, p = 0.012, respectively) with a good discrimination ability (AUC of 0.853). Features associated with distant metastasis in the univariate analysis included high tumor budding (p = 0.002), low intratumoral small vessel density (p = 0.013), absent lymphocellular intratumoral inflammation (p = 0.048) and abundant necrosis (p = 0.073). In the multivariate analysis only tumor budding was an independent predictor for haematogenous metastasis (p = 0.007) with a good discrimination ability (AUC of 0.829).

Conclusions

Thus, mainly tumor budding but also the described structural characteristics of the peritumoral tissue appears to reflect the metastatic potential of locally advanced CC and therefore should be stated in pathological reports.

Keywords

Tumor buddingInflammationDesmoplasiaNecrosisBlood vessel densityLymphaticsColon cancerMetastasis

Background

The metastatic state of colon carcinoma (CC) determines its prognosis. The 5-year survival rate of patients with distant metastasis is only about 10% compared to approximately 60% with lymphogenous metastasis and over 80% without metastasis [1]. Notably, metastatic dissemination could exist before a pathologically and clinically detectable manifestation. Hence the question arises, whether a detailed analysis of the microscopical tumor architecture on conventional histological sections and the recognition of potential structural differences between non-metastatic and metastatic cases could contribute to determine the metastatic potential of CC, beside the local tumor extent. Indeed, in histological sections a structural heterogeneity of CC can be seen within the different zones of the same tumor and between tumors of the same infiltrating depth and grading.

The main histopathological characteristics of carcinoma include the invasive growth pattern and the associated changes in the surrounding stroma such as stromal desmoplasia, peritumoral inflammatory reaction and necrosis. These structural features reflect the interaction between tumor cells and the “tumor microenvironment”, which may promote tumor growth and progression [2,3].

CC show different growth patterns at the invasive front. This so-called tumor budding is predictive of metastasis, local recurrence and survival in CC [4]. As an adverse prognostic factor tumor budding can help to stratify patients into more meaningful risk groups than TNM staging alone, as well as for adjuvant chemotherapy in low tumor stages [5]. Despite these data, a statement in the histopathological report concerning the degree of tumor budding has not yet been widely applied.

During cancer growth, tumors not only destroy the pre-existing extracellular matrix, but usually actively create their own stroma, the so-called desmoplastic stroma [6]. Desmoplasia may represent a barrier against cancer diffusion or a stroma to build up and support the tumor. Its role is controversially discussed regarding a tumor-protecting versus host-protecting impact.

The presence of immuno-inflammatory cells in CC is a common phenomenon [7]. The inflammatory response can have dual effects in the progression of cancer. On one side inflammation can promote tumor progression by various pro-inflammatory cytokines that activate tumorigenic pathways leading to increased growth and survival of tumor cells [8]. On the other hand, inflammatory cells have a host-protecting function in the sense of anti-tumor immunity. In CC lymphocytic reactions are independent prognostic factors for a better survival [9,10]. However, whether and which immune infiltrates have an effect on the metastatic potential of CC is not clear.

CC frequently shows characteristic necrotic debris in glandular lumina, so-called “dirty necrosis”. Tumor necrosis is seen in rapidly proliferating tumors outgrowing their blood supply, becoming hypoxic and finally necrotic. In turn, release of growth-, survival- and angiogenic factors support tumor progression and metastasis [11]. Tumor necrosis has been proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in carcinomas of various histogenetical origins [12]. In CC, first histological studies provided evidence of tumor necrosis as a parameter associated with progressive tumor behavior [13,14].

Tumor vasculature, the network of blood and lymphatic vessels in and around a growing neoplasm is a basic component of solid tumors is the tumor vasculature. The vessel system is essential for adequate tumor tissue oxygenation and nutritional supply but also for metastatic spread [15,16]. Despite the fact that vascular anatomy in tumor tissue represents an important subject for tumor growth and metastasis, reports with a detailed histoarchitectural analysis in human tissue are rare.

In order to determine characteristic structural features that could be associated with the process of metastasis we investigated the histomorphology of the tumor and its microenvironment in 86 non-metastatic, lymphogenous and haematogenous metastatic, moderately differentiated, subserosa-invasive CC. We characterized the grade of tumor budding, the cell types of the intra- and peritumoral inflammation as well as the extent and pattern of desmoplasia and necrosis. An essential part of our work was the analysis of the density of intra- and peritumoral as well as surrounding macro- and microvascular blood vessels. Additionally, we determined the functional state of the tumor-associated lymphatic vessels. The major aim of our study was to identify relevant predictive biomarkers for the metastatic potential of CC on the basis of conventional histology and routinely applicable immunohistochemistry, which can easily be integrated into the pathologist’s report in addition to the TNM-classification. We show that conventionally treated primary tumor slides contain valuable ancillary information on tumor behavior apart from features such as tumor infiltration depth.

Methods

Ethics statement

For the investigation of CC tissues ethical approval was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the federal state of Rhineland-Palatinate (Mainz, Germany). Written informed consent of all patients was obtained.

Tissue samples

The colon tissue samples used in this study came from 86 patients with an average age of 65.2 (range 52–83) undergoing elective surgery for sporadic CC at the University of Mainz during the years 1998–2003. None of the patients received chemotherapy or radiation therapy before surgery. The morphological classification of the carcinomas was conducted according to WHO specifications. All tumors were staged following the guidelines of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors [17]. With respect to the T status all tumors investigated were T3 (infiltration of subserosa) and moderately differentiated (G2). They were separated into three groups according to metastatic status. The first group comprised 37 cases without tumor metastasis to regional lymph nodes or distant organs (N0/M0). Among the remaining metastasizing cases, 24 were characterized by lymphogenous (N+) and 25 by lymphogenous and haematogenous metastases (M+). TNM-status confirms the tumor state at the time of pathological diagnosis. Thus, the metastatic cases had already metastasized. The metastasizing organ was in all M+ cases the liver.

Immunohistochemistry

All immunohistochemical reactions were conducted with formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples.

CD31, D2-40: After deparaffination heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed in Tris-EDTA buffer pH 9,0 for 20 min. using a vegetable steamer. Non-specific binding was blocked by Dako REAL™ Peroxidase-Blocking Solution (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) prior to incubation with the primary antibody. For the immunohistochemical staining procedure DAKO REAL™EnVision™Detection System, Peroxidase/DAB+, Rabbit/Mouse was utilized following the provider’s instructions. The primary antibodies mouse monoclonal CD31 (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and mouse monoclonal D2-40 (Signet, Dedham, MA, USA) were applied at a dilution of 1:50 for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin.

sm-actin: After deparaffination the primary antibody mouse monoclonal sm-actin (Zytomed Systems, Berlin, Germany) was added at a dilution of 1:800 for 45 minutes at room temperature. UltraVision Quanto Detection System HRP DAB (Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA) was used for the staining procedure following the provider’s instructions. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin.

Histopathological analysis

Haematoxylin and eosin (H.E.)-stained slides of the tumor specimen were evaluated by two authors (CJ, NS) independently without knowledge of the TNM-status.

Tumor budding was defined as single tumor cells and oligocellular tumor cell clusters (≤5 cells) along the tumor invasion front. It was graduated according to the scoring system proposed by Nakamura et al.,[18] as none – low (< 1/3 of invasion front) – moderate (> 1/3 < 2/3 of invasion front) or strong (> 2/3 of invasion front).

Inflammation was determined on the basis of the type composition of the detected inflammatory cells in H.E. stained tissue. Four types of inflammatory reactions were distinguished: pure lymphocytic, mixed (lymphocytic/neutrophilic), pure neutrophilic and histiocyte-rich inflammation.

For tumor-desmoplasia-necrosis tissue distribution viable tumor, desmoplastic stroma and necrosis were estimated as percentage of the entire tumor section. The total of the three pathological features was 100%. Additionally tumor/desmoplasia and tumor/necrosis ratios were calculated.

The desmoplastic pattern along the invasive front and surrounding subserosal adipose tissue was divided into a pushing, finger-like or net-like pattern. Necrotic areas included stromal necroses and intraluminal necrotic debris of the neoplastic glands.

Large vessel density (LVD): Arteries with a thick muscle wall were considered as large vessels. Two areas were counted at a low optical power (x 4 objective, field area 23.75 mm2). The final LVD was the mean value.

Small vessel density (SVD): Vessels with narrow lumina but well definable up to five smooth muscle layers were considered as small vessels. Five areas were counted at medium optical power (x 10 objective, field area 3.80 mm2). The final SVD was the mean value.

Microvascular density (MVD): Vessels with clearly defined lumina or linear vessel shape were regarded as microvessels. After immunohistochemical CD31 staining three highly vascularized areas (hot spots) were chosen at low optical power. Microvessel counting was performed at higher magnification within the hot spots (x 20 objective, field area 0.95 mm2). The final MVD was the mean value of three appraised high power fields.

LVD, SVD and MVD were determined intratumorally and along the invasion front, LVD and SVD additionally in tumor surrounding non-neoplastic subserosal adipose tissue.

Lymphatics were defined as D2-40-positive muscle layer-free vessels. Lymphatic vessels were evaluated according to the morphology of their lumina in the investigated tumor zone (compressed, mixed (compressed/open) and open).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using SAS statistical software. Differences between groups with respect to categorical variables were analyzed by the following methods: Chi2 test, Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression. P-values, odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used in the interpretation. Differences between groups with respect to continuous non-normal distributed variables were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All relevant variables being significant (p < 0.05) or showing a strong tendency towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic model and plotted as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to illustrate the predicted relevance. Additionally, we determined the intra- and interobserver agreement for the estimation of the tumor-desmoplasia-necrosis distribution with a test of reproducibility by calculating the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r) and with a test of reliability by evaluating the weighted kappa coefficient (κ) in 22 cases.

Results

To elucidate the relevance of the histomorphological features, tumor budding, peritumoral inflammation, desmoplasia, tumor-associated necrosis as well as morphology and density of tumor-associated blood and lymphatic vessels for CC metastasis, we investigated non-metastatic (N0/M0), lymphogenous-metastatic (N+), and haematogenous-metastatic (M+) CC. In order to document the structural and functional heterogeneity of tumor compartments we subdivided the tumor tissue into three zones, tumor center (zone 1), invasive margin (zone 2) and tumor-free surrounding tissue (zone 3). The tumor center represents the tumor compartment with the main mass of tumor with the most nutritional and oxygen requirements. The tumor margin represents the invasive front site and is a dynamic tumor-host interface. The surrounding tumor-free vessel-bearing subserosal adipose tissue ensures an adequate nutritional and oxygen supply.

Univariate analysis

Tumor budding

The graduation of tumor budding along the invasive front according to the scoring system proposed by Nakamura et al. [18] is a simple, reproducible method with high interobserver accordance. With the conventional H.E. staining disseminated single tumor cells and oligocellular tumor clusters (≤5 tumor cells) at the invasive margin were clearly identifiable. As shown in Table 1 the degree of this histopathological factor varied depending on metastatic status. The dichotomization between low (0 to 1/3 of the invasion front) versus high (>1/3 of the invasion front) tumor budding revealed that high tumor budding correlates with increased metastatic status. Whereas in only 10% of the non-metastazing cases high budding was observed, the metastatic carcinomas revealed high budding in about 50% of the cases. The results were highly significant between N0/M0 versus N+ (p = 0.0037) as well as N0/M0 versus M+ (p = 0.0022) (Table 2).
Table 1

Percentage distribution of histopathological features in non-metastatic (N0/M0), lymphogenous-metastatic (N+) and haematogenous-metastatic (M+) colon carcinomas

 

N0/M0

N+

M+

Tumor budding

   

none

24

4

0

weak

64

50

52

moderate

6

17

28

strong

6

29

20

Inflammation zone 1

   

none

3

21

16

granulocytic

3

0

8

mixed

46

33

28

lymphocytic

48

46

48

Inflammation zone 2

   

none

0

8

0

granulocytic

3

0

0

mixed

35

13

20

lymphocytic

59

79

68

xanthogranulomatous

3

0

12

Distribution (total 100%)

   

Tumor

52

50

48

Desmoplasia

34

38

35

Necrosis

14

12

17

Tumor/desmoplasia ratio

   

> median

59

33

48

≤ median

41

67

52

Tumor/necrosis ratio

   

> median

59

50

32

≤ median

41

50

68

Desmoplasia pattern

   

finger-like

46

21

36

pushing

27

46

20

net-like

27

33

44

Table 2

Univariate logistic regression analysis showing associations of histopathological features in non-metastatic (N0/M0) versus lymphogenous-metastatic (N+) and haematogenous-metastatic (M+) CC

 

N0/M0 vs. N+

 

N0/M0 vs. M+

 
 

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

Tumor budding low vs. high

6.98 (1.88-25.92)

0.004

7.61 (2.07-27.97)

0.002

Inflammation zone 1 lymphocytic vs. non-lymphocytic

0.22 (0.04-1.23)

0.084

0.18 (0.03-0.99)

0.048

Inflammation zone 2 lymphocytic vs. non-lymphocytic

0.63 (0.08-4.83)

NS

0.42 (0.06-2.71)

NS

Tumor percentage distribution

0.99 (0.96-1.03)

NS

0.98 (0.94-1.02)

NS

Desmoplasia percentage distribution

1.02 (0.98-1.06)

NS

1.01 (0.97-1.04)

NS

Necrosis percentage distribution

0.98 (0.93-1.02)

NS

1.01 (0.97-1.05)

NS

Tumor/desmoplasia ratio (> median, ≤median)

0.34 (0.12-0.99)

0.049

0.63 (0.23-1.75)

NS

Tumor/necrosis ratio (> median, ≤median)

0.68 (0.24-1.92)

NS

0.38 (0.13-1.09)

0.073

Desmoplasia pattern finger-like vs. non-finger-like

0.31 (0.09-1.01)

0.051

0.66 (0.23-1.87)

NS

Large vessel density zone 1 (> median, ≤median)

1.89 (0.63-5.62)

NS

2.07 (0.71-6.06)

NS

Large vessel density zone 2 (> median, ≤median)

2.61 (0.89-7.69)

NS

0,92 (0.33-2.57)

NS

Large vessel density zone 3 (> median, ≤median)

3.11 (1.03-9.32)

0.043

1.47 (0.53-4.09)

NS

Small vessel density zone 1 (> median, ≤median)

0.79 (0.28-2.28)

NS

0.24 (0.07-0.74)

0.013

Small vessel density zone 2 (> median, ≤median)

0.58 (0.20-1.65)

NS

0.87 (0.31-2.42)

NS

Small vessel density zone 3 (> median, ≤median)

1.30 (0.46-3.64)

NS

1.20 (0.43-3.33)

NS

Microvascular vessel density zone 1 (> median, ≤median)

0.89 (0.32-2.51)

NS

0.87 (0.31-2.42)

NS

Microvascular vessel density zone 2 (> median, ≤median)

1.37 (0.49-3.84)

NS

0.52 (0.81-1.45)

NS

Altered vessels zone 1 present vs. absent

0.83 (0.28-2.45)

NS

0.93 (0.33-2.67)

NS

Altered vessels zone 2 present vs. absent

1.41 (0.48-4.18)

NS

1.12 (0.37-3.35)

NS

Altered vessels zone 3 present vs. absent

0.93 (0.32-2.76)

NS

0.74 (0.24-2.21)

NS

Lymphatic vessels zone 1 open vs. compressed

0.29 (0.03-3.32)

NS

0.59 (0.03-10.11)

NS

Lymphatic vessels zone 2 open vs. compressed

1.59 (0.26-9.56)

NS

1.22 (0.27-5.52)

NS

Lymphatic vessels zone 3 open vs. compressed

1.62 (0.26-10.08)

NS

1.77 (0.32-9.71)

NS

Relevant variables being significant (p < 0.05) or showing a strong tendency towards significance (p < 0.1).

OR: odds ratio, C.I.: confidence interval, NS: no significant.

Inflammation

Using the conventional H.E. staining four types of inflammatory reaction in CC were identified: (1) pure lymphocytic, (2) pure granulocytic, (3) mixed granulocytic/lymphocytic and (4) histiocyte-rich. Inflammation were seen intratumorally (zone 1) and along the invasive front (zone 2). Lack of intratumoral inflammation effectively did not exist in non-metastatic cases (Table 1). In contrast, approximately 20% of the metastatic cases showed no intratumoral inflammation. Neutrophil granulocytes as exclusive inflammatory cells were seen only in three cases. A histiocyte-rich pattern was found in four cases, but only at the invasion front. In barely 50% of the cases, a lymphocellular infiltration was found in the tumor center, independent of the metastatic status. In a markedly higher percentage, a dominant, lymphocytic infiltration along the invasive margin in all comparative groups was demonstrated, especially in nodal positive carcinomas (79% of the cases). In about 50% of the non-metastatic and in approximately 30% of the metastatic cases a mixed type inflammation was seen in the intratumoral region. This inflammation pattern was observed less commonly at the tumor margin.

Comparing lymphocyte-associated (lymphocytic/mixed type) inflammation versus none/pure granulocytic reaction in zone 1, the results were just below statistical significance in the nodal positive status (p = 0.084) but significant in the cases of distant metastasis (p = 0.048) (Table 2). The inflammation type in zone 2 showed no significant differences between non-metastasized and metastasized cases (Tables 1 and 2).

Necrosis and Desmoplasia

For each tumor specimen the percentage of viable tumor, desmoplastic stromal reaction and necrosis was estimated. The estimation of the percentage distribution tumor-desmoplasia-necrosis was performed with a semiquantitative scoring system. The reproducibility of the intra- and interobserver variation was excellent and good, respectively (r = 0.817 for intraobserver variation and r = 0.771 for interobserver variation; p < 0.001). Both, the reliabilities for the intraobserver variation [κ = 0.799 (95% C.I.:0.577-1)] and for interobserver variation [κ = 0.753 (95% C.I.:0.520-0.987)] were good. The distribution of these three histopathological features did not reveal significant differences between the three groups (Table 1). The vital tumor mass was the largest component, accounting for about 50% of the tumor volume in both non-metastatic and lymphogenous-metastatic tumors.

As a next step we ascertained the tumor/necrosis ratio and the tumor/desmoplasia ratio. The tumor/necrosis ratio ranged from 0.5–70 for N0/M0, 0.75–40 for N+ and 0.5–12 for M+ with the median at 5.5 (Table 1). Abundant necrosis was found in 68% of cases with distant metastasis and only in 41% of metastatic-free cases. This difference was just below the statistical significance level (p = 0.073) (Table 2).

The tumor/desmoplasia ratio ranged from 0.43–5.33 in N0/M0, 0.5–5.33 in N+ and 0.5–6 in M+ with the median at 1.5 (Table 1). A prominent desmoplastic stromal reaction was shown in 67% of cases with lymph node metastasis and only in 41% in metastases-free cases. In the binary logistic regression model the nodal positive cases were strongly associated with a low tumor/desmoplasia ratio (p = 0.049) (Table 2).

Desmoplasia showed three different patterns, pushing, finger-like and net-like (Figure 1). The pushing pattern dominated in lymphogenous-metastatic patients whereas the finger-like pattern was commonest in non-metastatic cases (Table 1). In both groups 46% of the cases expressed the respective phenotype of peritumoral stromal reaction, so that a strong tendency just below statistical significance was observed (p = 0.051) (Table 2). The net-like pattern was seen most frequently in haematogenous-metastatic cases.
Figure 1

Desmoplastic pattern in CC. Pushing (A), finger-like (B) and net-like (C) pattern of desmoplasia in CC (H.E., x12,5).

Blood vessels

To evaluate the histological vascularization pattern of CC we performed immunostaining for the pan-endothelial marker CD31 and smooth muscle marker sm-actin which produced very strong signals in blood vessels of various sizes, that is, large and small vessels as well as microvasculature (Figure 2A-C). The distribution and density of these different sized vessels were analyzed in the tumor center, tumor margin and tumor-free surrounding tissue.
Figure 2

Morphology of blood and lymphatic vessels in CC. (A) Large vessels (sm-actin (SMA), x100), (B) small vessels (SMA, x200) and (C) microvascular vessels (CD31, x40) in CC. (D) Altered blood vessels with discontinuously hypoplastic smooth muscle cell layer (SMA, x200). (E) Intratumoral compressed lymphatic vessels (D2-40, x200). (F) Lymphatic vessels at the tumor periphery with open lumina (D2-40, x100).

Large vessels, essential for sufficient blood flow, were seen not only in zone 3 but also intratumorally and along the tumor front (Figures 3 and 4). It should be emphasized that these arteries showed arteriosclerotic changes, characterizing preexistent vessels. In zone 1 and 2 no significant correlations were found between LVD and metastatic status. In zone 3 nodal positive cases were associated with a significantly higher LVD compared to cases without metastasis (p = 0.043) (Table 2). LVD in N0/M0 ranged from 0 – 5.0/25 mm2 with the median at 0.5/25 mm2 and in N+ from 0 – 5.5/25 mm2 with the median at 1,3/25 mm2 (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Vascular densitiy in three different zones in non-metastatic (N0/M0) and lymphogenous metastatic (N+) CC. Box plot of large vessel density (LVD), small vessel density (SVD) and microvascular vessel density (MVD) in zone 1, zone 2 and zone 3 between non-metastatic (N0/M0) and lymphogenous metastatic (N+) CC. The dark lines denote the median and the open diamond the mean value of each group.

Figure 4

Vascular densitiy in three different zones in non-metastatic (N0/M0) and haematogenous metastatic (M+) CC. Box plots of large vessel density (LVD), small vessel density (SVD) and microvascular vessel density (MVD) in zone 1, zone 2 and zone 3 between non-metastatic (N0/M0) and haematogenous metastatic (M+) CC. The dark lines denote the median and the open diamond the mean value of each group.

Small vessels, responsible for the maintenance of a densely branched vascular network, were seen at different intensity levels in all three zones (Figures 3 and 4). In zone 1 cases with distant metastasis were associated with a lower SVD compared to N0/M0 (p = 0.013) (Table 2). SVD in N0/M0 ranged from 0 – 6.8/4 mm2 with a median value of 2,0/4 mm2 and in M+ from 0 – 3.2/4 mm2 with a median of 1.2/4 mm2 (Figure 4). SVD in zone 2 and 3 revealed no significant correlation with metastatic status.

MVD is known as a histological biomarker reflecting the angiogenetic phenotype of the tumor. In the binary logistic regression model with cut-off at the median no significant correlation regarding metastatic status was verifiable. The distribution of MVD between the three investigated groups was similar in zone 1 as well as in zone 2 (Figures 3 and 4). In zone 1 MVD in N0/M0 ranged from 14.7 – 49.7/mm2 (mean 25.8/mm2), in N+ from 15.7-52.3 (mean 26.9/mm2) and in M+ from 14.0 – 39.3/mm2 (mean 23.5/mm2). In zone 2 MVD in N0/M0 ranged from 13.3 – 57.7/mm2 (mean 24.8/mm2), in N+ from 10.7-74.7(mean 26.6 /mm2) and in M+ from 10.0 – 52.0/mm2 (mean 22.4 /mm2).

After closer examination of the blood vessel morphology using sm-actin for detailed visualization of the vascular muscle layer a mural alteration was noticed in some of the vessels (Figure 2D). Typically, the tunica media is a layer of continuously concentrically-arranged smooth muscle and elastic fibers. Some blood vessels showed smooth muscle cell hypoplasia with disorganized myogenic fragments and replacement by connective tissue. The distribution of these altered tumor-associated blood vessels within the three zones and among the three groups was strikingly similar (Table 3). In all three tumor compartments in about 33% of the cases this interesting histopathological feature could be demonstrated and was independent of metastatic status.
Table 3

Percentage distribution of altered blood vessels and lymphatic vessels according to their functional status intratumorally (zone 1), along the invasive front (zone 2) and extratumorally (zone 3) in non-metastatic (N0/M0), lymphogenous-metastatic (N+) and haematogenous-metastatic (M+) colon carcinomas

 

N0/M0

N+

M+

Altered vessels zone 1

   

present

38

33

36

absent

62

67

64

Altered vessels zone 2

   

present

30

38

32

absent

70

62

68

Altered vessels zone 3

   

present

35

33

28

absent

65

67

72

Lymphatic vessels zone 1

   

absent

3

9

4

compressed

78

58

68

mixed

19

33

24

open

0

0

4

Lymphatic vessels zone 2

   

absent

13

8

16

compressed

38

42

56

mixed

46

42

24

open

3

8

4

Lymphatic vessels zone 3

   

absent

30

21

24

compressed

11

12

16

mixed

16

17

24

open

43

50

36

Altered vessels were defined as blood vessels showing a discontinuous, hypoplastic smooth muscle cell layer (see Figure 2D).

Lymphatic vessels

To detect lymphatic vessels sections were stained with the specific lymphatic endothelial marker D2-40. In almost all investigated cases intratumoral lymphatics were seen (Table 3). Only in 16% and 17% respectively of non-metastatic and lymphogenous metastatic and in 20% of the haematogenous metastatic cases lymphatics were not detectable in tumor-associated regions. Under normal circumstances lymphatic vessels are partially or fully collapsed due to the lack of smooth muscle coverage and low pressure within the lymphatic system. However, for lymphatic vessel invasion open lumina are an important condition. For that reason we focused our attention on the functional state of lymphatic vessels in the three tumor zones. In this context, we recognized three functional lumen patterns, predominantly only compressed, predominantly only open and partly compressed/partly open lumina. Interestingly, whereas most of the intratumoral lymphatics were compressed, an increasing number of open lymphatics along the invasive tumor margin was observed and a clear dominance of lymph vessels with open lumina could be seen in zone 3 (Figure 2E and F). No significant differences could be established among the three metastatic groups (Table 2).

Due to the fact that serial sections were not analyzed a statement concerning the relevance for lymphangiosis and haemangiosis carcinomatosa cannot be made.

Multivariate analysis

Factors influencing nodal metastasis in the univariate analysis included high tumor budding, high large vessel density in the surrounding tumor-free tissue abundant desmoplasia, non-finger-like desmoplastic pattern and absent lymphocyte-containing intratumoral inflammation. In the multivariate analysis, except LVD, these pathomorphological features were independent risk factors for lymphogenous metastasis (p = 0.023, p = 0.017, p = 0.037, p = 0.012, respectively) (Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showing associations of relevant histopathological features in non-metastatic (N0/M0) versus lymphogenous-metastatic (N+) and haematogenous-metastatic (M+) CC

 

N0/M0 vs. N+

N0/M0 vs. M+

 

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Tumor budding low vs. high

5.99 (1.28-27.90)

0.023

8.70 (1.83-41.42)

0.007

Inflammation zone 1 lymphocytic vs.non-lymphocytic

0.06 (0.01-0.52)

0.012

0.20 (0.03-1.38)

NS

Tumor/Necrosis ratio (> median, ≤median)

  

0.46 (0.13-1.62)

NS

Tumor/Desmoplasia ratio (> median, ≤median)

0.17 (0.04-0.73)

0.017

  

Desmoplastic pattern finger-like vs. non-finger-like

0.18 (0.03-0.89)

0.037

  

Large vessel density zone 3 (> median, ≤median)

2.437 (0.61-9.69)

NS

  

Small vessel density zone 1 (> median, ≤median)

  

0.33 (0.09-1.23)

NS

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, NS: no significant.

Taking into account these identified independent factors, their ability to discriminate between non-metastatic and lymphogenous metastatic group was assessed by a ROC curve. The vertical axis represents sensitivity, which is the proportion of predicted metastatic cases among patients with lymph node metastasis, and the horizontal axis represents specifity, which is the proportion of predicted non-metastastic cases among patients who were de facto without metastasis. The more concave the curve, the better the prediction ability. The area under the curve (AUC) is a numerical assessment of concavity. An AUC of 0.5 indicates that prediction is based purely on random chance, and an AUC of 1 indicates that the outcome can be perfectly predicted. In our study the AUC for nodal metastasis was 0.853 suggesting good discrimination (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting nodal metastasis in CC. ROC curve indicating the sensitivity and specificity of the relevant histopathological features (tumor budding, lymphocellular intratumoral inflammation and abundant desmoplasia with non-finger-like pattern) for predicting nodal metastasis in CC.

Factors associated with distant metastasis in the univariate analysis included high tumor budding, low intratumoral small vessel density, absent lymphocyte-containing intratumoral inflammation and abundant necrosis. In the multivariate analysis only tumor budding was proven to be an independent predictor for haematogenous metastasis (p = 0.007) (Table 4). Figure 6 illustrates good discrimination ability (AUC of 0.829).
Figure 6

Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting distant metastasis in CC. ROC curve indicating the sensitivity and specificity of tumor budding as solely relevant histopathological feature for predicting distant metastasis in CC.

Notably, in none of the investigated factors could significant differences between lymphogenously and haematogenously metastatic cases be assessed.

Discussion

This study is one of the first attempts to identify relevant biomarkers in predicting metastasis in CC by detection of structural differences between non-metastatic, lymphogenous-metastatic and haematogenous-metastastic cases in conventional histological sections. From all investigated histological features in tumor tissue of CC high tumor budding, defined as single tumor cells or small tumor cell clusters (≤5 cells) sprouting in more than a third of the total invasion front, emerged as the most convincing predictive factor for both lymph node and distant metastasis. In the literature a strong association between tumor budding and the presence of lymph node metastases is well documented, especially in early submucosa-invasive tumors [19-23]. The significance of tumor budding for distant CC metastasis has received little attention as yet. However, two studies showed that the presence of tumor budding correlates with liver and peritoneal metastases [24,18]. In the present study high tumor budding was the only independent factor in multivariate analysis associated with distant metastasis. The prevailing hypothesis concerning the biological importance of tumor budding is that it represents an epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a biological process characterized by increased migratory capacity and invasiveness [25]. Additionally, it has been hypothesized that budding cells have cancer stem cell character, resulting in enhanced invasive and metastatic properties [26,27]. Despite different scoring systems lacking standardized graduation, tumor budding has proved to be a reliable prognostic marker for CC [28]. In this context, our results underline the fact that this histomorphological feature is an independent predictive factor not only for lymph node but also for distant metastasis of locally advanced CC with good discrimination ability. Tumor budding could be used as a target to discriminate between different aggressive behavior patterns in subserosa-invasive, moderately differentiated CC. In view of these data, a histopathological report should include information on tumor budding, beyond the obligatory TNM-status and grading. The establishment of a consistent, generally accepted, simple applicable scoring system is necessary.

In our study absence of intratumoral lymphocytic inflammation was another histological characteristic associated with nodal and distant metastases. In the multivariate analysis this observation was an independent predictor for lymph node metastasis, but not for distant metastasis. In nearly all non-metastasizing cases lymphocyte infiltration, whether pure or combined with neutrophils, was found within the tumor. These results indicate a predominant role for a tumor-associated adaptive immunity within the tumor itself in the prevention of tumor progression in CC. The protective role of lymphocytes in CC was discussed by a number of study groups. In an overview article Roxburgh and McMillan [29] presented the published data on the relationship between tumor inflammatory cell infiltration and patient survival over a 40 year period. Collectively, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes indicates a favorable prognosis. In this context, the comparison between tumors of the same local anatomical extent in the present study suggests a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte-dependent decreased metastatic potential. In accordance with our results another study demonstrated, that CC metastases in lymph nodes and in the liver are detected when the immune infiltrate in the primary tumor tends to be scarce [30]. In rectal cancer an increased Dukes stage was associated with less peritumoral lymphocyte infiltrate [31]. Interestingly, in virtually all investigated cases independent of the metastatic status a lymphocyte-containing inflammatory response was found in the tumor margin. In this context, Zlobec et al. [32] reported that lymphocytic inflammation at the invasion front does not appear to be an independent prognostic factor in CC. However, gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry with evaluation of immune cell subtypes demonstrated that type, density and location of immune cells within the tumor samples seem to be a better predictor of patient survival than the histopathological methods currently used to stage CC [33]. The present study has focused only on the inflammatory cell types detected by conventional H.E. staining and their distribution intratumorally and at the invasive front. Furthermore, it assessed neither their density nor the immunhistochemically determined detailed composition and functional state of immune cell subsets. Nonetheless, our preliminary findings indicate that the daily routine H.E. stained tissue sections are a convenient and inexpensive way to study intratumoral inflammation and to gain valuable information on probable tumor metastatic behavior.

In CC, studies of desmoplasia give conflicting results. Several studies suggest that a peritumoral stromal response is an adverse prognostic factor [34-36]. By contrast, Coporale et al. [37] favor the view that desmoplasia is a protective factor for patient survival. In 2D and 3D co-culture systems the cell-cell contact between fibroblast and CC cells evoked an increase of extracellular matrix density and led to inhibited tumor migration and invasion [38]. In our study, abundant desmoplasia (tumor/desmoplasia ratio ≤ 1.5) was an independent predicting factor for lymph node metastasis. Besides differences in the quantity of desmoplasia, we also observed distinct expansion patterns without knowledge of their biological significance. While positive nodal cases showed mostly a pushing desmoplastic stroma pattern, non-metastatic cases exhibited a finger-like pattern. This characteristic spatial extent of desmoplasia was also an independent predictor for nodal status in the multivariate analysis.

Tumor necrosis is a common histological feature in colon cancer, but its biological significance is unclear. So far, only two studies describe the correlation between the extent of histologic tumor necrosis and the TNM-stage. Both research groups reported that extent of necrosis was associated significantly with lymph node metastasis [13,14]. In our study abundant necrosis (tumor/necrosis ratio ≤ 5.5) was seen tendentially more often in cases with distant metastasis. The amount of necrosis in metastatic-free and nodally positive cases was approximately equal. Further investigations are required to determine the role of tumor necrosis in CC metastasis.

The tumor tissue of CC was composed of three basic histological components, namely the cancer cells themselves, the (desmoplastic) interstitium and the necrotic areas. The viable carcinomatous glands were the largest component accounting about 50% of the tumor volume in both non-metastatic and lymphogenous-metastatic tumors. It is clear that the establishment of a functionally integrated vascular system is essential for tumor growth and metastasis. In the present study the density of large and small blood vessels as well as the microvasculature in three strategically significant regions, namely intratumoral, invasive margin and adjacent host tissue, were chosen as a quantitative parameter to describe the vascular network. The large vessels were not only seen in the surrounding subserosal adipose tissue but also within the tumor and along the invasion front. The detection of arteriosclerotic change gave evidence of preexisting vessels. This observation is remarkable, for large vessels are usually not found within the muscle wall and the parts closer to the intestinal lumen. We suggest that the traction effect of the desmoplasia could play an important role by adducting these vessels into the tumor center and front.

Since macrovasculature is responsible for abundant blood transport, this vascular concentration is essential for adjacent nutrition supply. In our study lymphogenous-metastatic CC showed significantly more often a relatively high density of large vessels in the tumor-free peritumoral region. Haematogenous-metastatic CC presented significantly more often a relatively low density of small vessels in the intratumoral region. Since these vessels form a network that regulates local blood perfusion, this fact could explain the abundant necrotic areas in these cases. To our knowledge these observations have not been described in conventional histological sections in detail before. Additionally, in about one third of the CC and independent of the metastatic status we found altered blood vessels with discontinuously hypoplastic muscle wall layers, intra- as well as extratumorally. We hypothesize that these vessels could reflect immature tumor vascular entities, which enable tumors to adapt more easily to extremely harsh conditions because of their leaky architecture with higher fluid and solute exchange ability. In addition, these immature vessels could enhance tumor cell entry into the circulation and hence distant metastasis. In another study immature microvessels without pericyte coverage were described in correlation with haematogenous metastasis of CC [39]. Microvascular density (MVD) is considered to be the morphological gold standard to assess the neovasculature in human tumors [40]. A meta-analysis found a statistically significant inverse relationship between MVD and survival in CC [41]. In our study MVD measurement in central tumor portions and at the surrounding part of the tumor was without significant differences between non-metastatic and metastatic CC. Our results indicate that MVD is not sufficient to predict metastasis in locally advanced CC. In this tumor status, the evaluation of expression of angiogenic factors in tumor specimens might provide an alternative to MVD in assessing tumor angiogenic activity with more functional information.

In almost all CC intratumoral lymphatics were detectable but were mostly collapsed and showed compressed lumina. In contrast to this, directly beneath the deep infiltration front in the peritumoral region and mainly in the tumor-free surrounding tissue lymphatic vessels with open lumina predominated. This morphological distribution suggests a prevalent role of peritumoral lymphatics in lymphogenous metastasis, because collapsed intratumoral lymphatics are not suitable for tumor cell dissemination. Collapsed intratumoral lymphatics could reflect a mechanical stress situation induced by the vessel pressure in the desmoplastic tumor tissue. By a compensatory mechanism the resulting elevated lymph pressure could lead to a dilatation of the lymphatics in the tumor periphery. Another research group has made the same observations in CC using color stereoscopic lymphography [42]. We conclude that the tumor margin and the surrounding tissue with open lymphatics are the most favorable site of entry of tumor cells into lymphatics. Notably, no significant differences between non-metastatic and metastatic cases were found concerning this specific lymphovascular histoarchitecture.

Conclusions

Taken the results together, tumor budding represents an independent predictive biomarker with a good discrimination ability for both lymphogenous and haematogenous metastasis in moderately differentiated, subserosa-invasive CC. Absence of intratumoral lymphocytic inflammation and abundant desmoplasia with non-finger-like pattern could provide additional independent predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. Abundant tumor necrosis with low intratumoral small vessel density is a common feature of distant metastasis. Thus, tumor budding and the local peritumoral situation seem to be able to reflect the metastatic potential. A statement of these histological features in the histopathological report could provide an ancillary tool for the further imaging and therapeutic management after surgery. Since metastatic dissemination could exist before a pathologically and clinically detectable manifestation, these features could also be considered in metastatic-free cases in locally advanced CC.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Denise Welsch for her help with the statistical Analysis and Sylvia Habedank for technical assistance. This study was funded by the state of Rhineland-Palatine, Germany within the scope of the general funds of the Institute of Pathology at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz for personnel and consummable costs.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Pathology, Johannes Gutenberg University
(2)
Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Cologne
(3)
Institute of Pathology Essen-Mitte

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mareel M, Leroy A. Clinical, cellular and molecular aspects of cancer Invasion. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:337–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. De Wever O, Mareel M. Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion. J Pathol. 2003;200:429–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zlobec I, Lugli A. Epithelial mesenchymal transition and tumor budding in aggressive colorectal cancer: tumor budding as oncotarget. Oncotarget. 2010;1:651–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mitrovic B, Schaeffer DF, Riddell RH, Kirsch R. Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma: time to take notice. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1315–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kunz-Schughart LA, Knuechel R. Tumor-associated fibroblasts (part I): active stromal participants in tumor development and progression? Histol Histopathol. 2002;17:599–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ribatti D, Crivellato E, Vacca A. Inflammation and antiangiogenesis in cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:955–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Klampfer L. Cytokines, inflammation and colon cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2011;11:451–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohtani H. Focus on TILs: prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Immun. 2007;7:4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pagès F, Galon J, Fridman WH. The essential role of the in situ immune reaction in human colorectal cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;84:981–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vakkila J, Lotze MT. Inflammation and necrosis promote tumour growth. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:641–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Richards CH, Mohammed Z, Qayyum T, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The prognostic value of histological tumor necrosis in solid organ malignant disease: a systematic review. Future Oncol. 2011;7:1223–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollheimer MJ, Kornprat P, Lindtner RA, Harbaum L, Schlemmer A, Rehak P, et al. Tumor necrosis is a new promising prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:1749–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Richards CH, Roxburgh CS, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Foulis AK, Horgan PG, et al. Prognostic value of tumour necrosis and host inflammatory responses in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kopfstein L, Christofori G. Metastasis: cell-autonomous mechanisms versus contributions by the tumor microenvironment. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:449–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Albrecht I, Christofori G. Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in development and cancer. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55:483–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Kikuchi S, Ohtani Y, Sato K. Evaluation of the usefulness of tumor budding on the prediction of metastasis to the lung and liver after curative excision of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:1432–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H. Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:628–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Masaki T, Matsuoka H, Sugiyama M, Abe N, Mori T, Atomi Y, et al. Budding as a useful determinant of the optimal treatment for T1 rectal carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:388–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang LM, Kevans D, Mulcahy H, O’Sullivan J, Fennelly D, Hyland J, et al. Tumor budding is a strong and reproducible prognostic marker in T3N0 colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:134–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Homma Y, Hamano T, Otsuki Y, Shimizu S, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi Y. Severe tumor budding is a risk factor for lateral lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:230–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Märkl B, Renk I, Oruzio DV, Jähnig H, Schenkirsch G, Schöler C, et al. Tumour budding, uPA and PAI-1 are associated with aggressive behaviour in colon cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H. Budding as a useful prognostic marker in pT3 well- or moderately-differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83:42–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalluri R. EMT: when epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1417–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo WR, Gao F, Li SY, Yao KT. Tumour budding and the expression of cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Histopathology. 2012;61:1072–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Reggiani Bonetti L, Migaldi M, Caredda E, Boninsegna A, Ponz De Leon M, Di Gregorio C, et al. Increased expression of CD133 is a strong predictor of poor outcome in stage I colorectal cancer patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1211–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lugli A, Karamitopoulou E, Zlobec I. Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1713–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. The role of the in situ local inflammatory response in predicting recurrence and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:451–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Bindea G, Meatchi T, et al. Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:610–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roxburgh CS, Salmond JM, Horgan PG, Oien KA, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based pathologic and biochemical criteria in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249:788–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zlobec I, Baker K, Minoo P, Hayashi S, Terracciano L, Lugli A. Tumor border configuration added to TNM staging better stratifies stage II colorectal cancer patients into prognostic subgroups. Cancer. 2009;115:4021–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Halvorsen TB, Seim E. Association between invasiveness, inflammatory reaction, desmoplasia and survival in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:162–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Compton CC, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference. Colorectal working group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sis B, Sarioglu S, Sokmen S, Sakar M, Kupelioglu A, Fuzun M. Desmoplasia measured by computer assisted image analysis: an independent prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:32–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Caporale A, Amore Bonapasta S, Scarpini M, Ciardi A, Vestri A, Ruperto M, et al. Quantitative investigation of desmoplasia as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. J Invest Surg. 2010;23:105–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Coulson-Thomas VJ, Coulson-Thomas YM, Gesteira TF, de Paula CA, Mader AM, Waisberg J, et al. Colorectal cancer desmoplastic reaction up-regulates collagen synthesis and restricts cancer cell invasion. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;346:223–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yonenaga Y, Mori A, Onodera H, Yasuda S, Oe H, Fujimoto A, et al. Absence of smooth muscle actin-positive pericyte coverage of tumor vessels correlates with hematogenous metastasis and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Oncology. 2005;69:159–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nico B, Benagiano V, Mangieri D, Maruotti N, Vacca A, Ribatti D. Evaluation of microvascular density in tumors: pro and contra. Histol Histopathol. 2008;23:601–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Des Guetz G, Uzzan B, Nicolas P, Cucherat M, Morere JF, Benamouzig R, et al. Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1823–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanczyk M, Olszewski WL, Gewartowska M, Domaszewska-Szostek A. Lack of functioning lymphatics and accumulation of tissue fluid/lymph in interstitial “lakes” in colon cancer tissue. Lymphology. 2010;43:158–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jayasinghe et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement