Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Role of key-regulator genes in melanoma susceptibility and pathogenesis among patients from South Italy

  • Milena Casula1,
  • Antonio Muggiano2,
  • Antonio Cossu3,
  • Mario Budroni4,
  • Corrado Caracò5,
  • Paolo A Ascierto5,
  • Elena Pagani6,
  • Ignazio Stanganelli7,
  • Sergio Canzanella8,
  • MariaCristina Sini1,
  • Grazia Palomba1,
  • The Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) and
  • Giuseppe Palmieri1Email author
BMC Cancer20099:352

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-352

Received: 3 April 2009

Accepted: 3 October 2009

Published: 3 October 2009

Abstract

Background

Several genetic alterations have been demonstrated to contribute to the development and progression of melanoma. In this study, we further investigated the impact of key-regulator genes in susceptibility and pathogenesis of such a disease.

Methods

A large series (N = 846) of sporadic and familial cases originating from South Italy was screened for germline mutations in p16 CDKN2A , BRCA2, and MC1R genes by DHPLC analysis and automated DNA sequencing. Paired primary melanomas and lymph node metastases from same patients (N = 35) as well as melanoma cell lines (N = 18) were analyzed for somatic mutations in NRAS, BRAF, and p16 CDKN2A genes.

Results

For melanoma susceptibility, investigations at germline level indicated that p16 CDKN2A was exclusively mutated in 16/545 (2.9%) non-Sardinian patients, whereas BRCA2 germline mutations were observed in 4/91 (4.4%) patients from North Sardinia only. Two MC1R germline variants, Arg151Cys and Asp294His, were significantly associated with melanoma in Sardinia. Regarding genetic events involved in melanoma pathogenesis at somatic level, mutually-exclusive mutations of NRAS and BRAF genes were observed at quite same rate (about two thirds) in cultured and in vivo melanomas (either primary or metastatic lesions). Conversely, p16 CDKN2A gene alterations were observed at increased rates moving from primary to metastatic melanomas and melanoma cell lines. Activation of the ERK gene product was demonstrated to be consistently induced by a combination of molecular alterations (NRAS/BRAF mutations and p16 CDKN2A silencing).

Conclusion

Our findings further clarified that: a) mutation prevalence in melanoma susceptibility genes may vary within each specific geographical area; b) multiple molecular events are accumulating during melanomagenesis.

Keywords

MelanomaGermline MutationMelanoma PatientMelanoma Cell LineBreslow Thickness

Background

In fair skinned populations, both incidence and mortality rates of melanoma have been increasing over the past decades [1]. Fortunately, the most recent data on the melanoma epidemic suggest that majority of melanoma patients presents with thin lesions (Breslow thickness ≤ 1.00 mm) at the time of diagnosis, due to a steady improvement of the secondary prevention and early detection [2].

Baseline melanoma incidences have been found to vary according to the population's origin: Australia, the United States, and Sweden present a higher baseline incidence than Europe (except Sweden) [3, 4]. Considering the European population, there is a gradient of melanoma incidence moving from northern countries (where incidence is higher) to southern countries [5]. In Italy, different incidence rates of melanoma between the northern and southern parts of the country (standardized rates per year per 100.000 inhabitants: 10.5-13.5 in North Italy versus 3.5-4.5 in South Italy) have been also reported [5].

Environmental and, mostly, genetic factors have been demonstrated to participate in susceptibility and pathogenesis of human melanoma. An intermittent exposure to ultraviolet radiation, especially in combination with endogenous factors like skin type and number of nevi, is the most commonly involved environmental factor [69].

From the genetic point of view, several gene alterations have been implicated. Germline mutations in p16 CDKN2A gene represent the most recognized cause of inherited melanoma susceptibility. Prevalence of p16 CDKN2A mutations seems to be heterogeneously distributed among melanoma patients within different geographical areas [10]; our previous study on melanoma patients originating from South Italy indicated that p16 CDKN2A mutations were absent in North Sardinia and occurred in non-Sardinian patients only [11]. Several low-penetrance candidate genes, such as breast cancer susceptibilitygene 2 (BRCA2) and melanocortin-1-receptor (MC1R), have been also implicated in melanoma predisposition [12, 13]. Inherited mutations of the BRCA2 gene have been associated to development of both ocular and cutaneous melanomas, in addition to the main predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers [1214]. The MC1R gene encodes the melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MSHR), a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily and represents one of the major genes which determine skin pigmentation [1517]. The MC1R gene is remarkably polymorphic in Caucasian populations [18]; its sequence variants can result in partial (r) or complete (R) loss of the receptor's signalling ability [19]. The MC1R variants were suggested to be associated with red hair, fair skin, and increased risk of both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers [1821]. Moreover, melanomas developed on skin not chronically exposed to sun usually carry either a mutated NRAS or mutated BRAF or concurrently mutated BRAF and PTEN [22]; evidence indeed suggest that BRAF/PTEN and NRAS somatic mutations are mutually exclusive or, in other words, that both mutation subsets does not occur in the same melanoma cell [2225]. Finally, the ERK1-2 proteins, which represent the downstream components of the NRAS-BRAF-MEK signaling kinase cascade, have been found to be activated through phosphorilation (pERK1-2) in melanoma and implicated in rapid malignant cell growth, mostly as a consequence of mutations in upstream components of the pathway [2527].

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the spectrum of such genetic alterations in both germline DNA, using a clinic-based series of sporadic and familial melanomas from South Italy (including cases from the entire Sardinia island), and somatic DNA, using a subset of melanoma tissues and cell lines. Correlations between genetic alterations and melanoma susceptibility or pathogenesis was thus inferred.

Methods

Melanoma cases

Eight hundred and forty-six patients with histologically-proven diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma were included into the study. Among them, 301 originated from Sardinia and 545 from other southern Italian regions; no substantial difference was observed in patients' characteristics between the Sardinian and non-Sardinian series. To avoid any bias, patients were consecutively collected from January 2001 to December 2006; they were included regardless of age of onset, cancer family history, and disease characteristics. Moreover, 35 melanoma tissues (paraffin-embedded primary melanomas and frozen samples from synchronous or asynchronous lymph node metastases of the same patients) and 18 melanoma cell lines (cultured from primary and metastatic tumours - see below) were collected.

Clinical and pathological features such as histological classification (including Breslow thickness) and disease stage at diagnosis were confirmed by medical records, review of pathologic material, and/or pathology reports. Familial recurrence of melanoma was ascertained by using a questionnaire to interview probands about their first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. Melanoma families were identified according to standardized criteria [23]: a) at least three affected members, or b) two affected members and presence of at least one of the following subcriteria: i) at least one affected member younger than 50 years at onset, or ii) a case of pancreatic cancer in a first- or second-degree relative, or iii) one affected member with multiple primary melanomas. Patients were informed about aims and limits of the study and blood samples were obtained with their written consent.

The study was reviewed and approved by the ethical review boards of both Azienda USL1 and University of Sassari.

Mutation screening of candidate genes

For mutation analysis, genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples or tumour tissues or melanoma cell lines, using standard methods. At germline DNA level, the full coding sequences and splice junctions of p16 CDKN2A (exons 1α, 2, and 3) and BRCA2 (exons 1-26) genes were screened for mutations using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) on a Wave® nucleic acid fragment analysis system (Transgenomic, Santa Clara, CA). As previously reported by our group[28], abnormal PCR products identified by DHPLC analysis were directly sequenced using an automated fluorescence- cycle sequencer (ABIPRISM 3130, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). About half of the present cohort (437 patients) has been already tested for p16 CDKN2A germline mutations in our previous study [11]. Subsets of Sardinian patients originating from all geographical areas within the island were screened for mutations in the MC1R gene as above. At somatic DNA level, the full coding sequences and splice junctions of p16 CDKN2A , NRAS (exons 2-3), and BRAF (exons 2-17) genes were screened for mutations as above. Primer sets and protocols for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were as previously described [11, 20, 28, 29]. For melanoma cell lines, we also performed mutation analysis of the PTEN gene (exons 1-9); primer sequences were as reported in Genome DataBase (GDB at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/human).

To evaluate the prevalence of each gene variant in a control population, unrelated healthy individuals, originating from the same geographical areas and with no recurrence of cancer in family, were used as controls and screened for sequence variations.

Immunochemical analysis

Immunocytochemistry was performed on cultured melanoma cells, using standard procedures. Melanoma cell lines were kindly provided by Dr. Stefania D'Atri at the Institute Dermopatico dell'Iacolata in Rome. They were established as primary short term cell cultures starting from tumour samples of donors patients with documented diagnosis of melanoma, after obtaining their informed consent Immunocytochemical analysis was performed using primary monoclonal antibodies against p16CDKN2A (JC-2 Lab Vision-Neo-Markers, Fremont, CA) and pERK1-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) proteins.

Immunocytochemical staining was evaluated semi-quantitatively, using antibody negative and positive controls. Intensity and distribution of immunostaining was used to classify cells as positive (strong [+++] to moderate [++] staining, homogeneously distributed or presented by large majority of tumour cells) or negative (absent [-] or weak staining [+]) for gene expression. Scoring was performed by at least two investigators (in very few borderline cases, classification of immunostaining required additional investigators and was based on the consistency of the majority of them).

Statistical analysis

Statistical correlation between MC1R germline mutations and disease was performed by chi-square test. Odds ratios of carrying gene mutations were estimated by the logistic regression model and are reported with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Features for the relative risk calculation were analyzed as dichotomous variables (presence versus absence). The exact coefficient for sample proportion analysis was performed to determine all significant parameters (below 0.05 level). All analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS/7.5 per Windows.

Results

Predisposing mutations in melanoma

Genomic DNA from 301 melanoma patients with ascertained Sardinian origin and 545 melanoma cases originating from non-Sardinian southern Italian regions was screened for germline mutations of p16 CDKN2A , the main melanoma susceptibility gene. PCR products corresponding to the coding exons and intron-exon junctions were analyzed for mutations as described in Methods. For p16 CDKN2A gene, 7 germline mutations were detected in 16/545 (2.9%) non-Sardinian patients (Table 1). All mutations have been reported as disease-related variants in the Human Gene Mutation Database at http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk; the S12X and E26X mutations were classified as disease-causing variants due to their truncation effect on proteins. In particular, six (17.1%) p16 CDKN2A mutation carriers were among 35 melanoma patients who had at least one additional affected members in the family; the remaining ten (2.0%) p16 CDKN2A mutation carriers were among 510 melanoma patients with sporadic disease (Table 2). None of 301 Sardinian patients was found positive for germline mutations in such a gene (Table 2). All p16 CDKN2A mutations were absent in normal genomic DNA from 103 unrelated healthy individuals (corresponding to 206 control chromosomes), originating from the same geographical areas.
Table 1

Germline mutations in p16 CDKN2A and BRCA2 genes.

Gene

Nucleotide

Codon

Base Change

Amino Acid Change

Designation

P16 CDKN2A

35

12

C to A

Ser to Stop

S12X

P16 CDKN2A

71

24

G to C

Arg to Pro

A24P

P16 CDKN2A

76

26

G to T

Glu to Stop

E26X

P16 CDKN2A

106

36

G to A

Ala to Thr

A36T

P16 CDKN2A

176

59

T to G

Val to Gly

V59G

P16 CDKN2A

301

101

G to T

Gly to Trp

G101W

P16 CDKN2A

326

109

C to T

Ala to Val

A109V

BRCA2

8503

2835

T to C

Ser to Pro

Ser2835Pro

BRCA2

8765

2845

delAG

Stop 2867

8765delAG

Table 2

Distribution of germline mutations in p16 CDKN2A and BRCA2 genes according to patients' origin

Analyzed gene

Patients' origin

No. of analyzed patients

Positive cases

  

No.

%

CDKN2A

846

16

1.9

   non-Sardinian

545

16

2.9

Familial

35

6

17.1

Sporadic

510

10

2.0

Sardinian

301

0

Familial

10

0

Sporadic

291

0

BRCA2

455

4

0.9

   non-Sardinian

154

0

Sardinian

301

4

1.3

North Sardinia

91

4

4.4

Familial

4

1

25.0

Sporadic

87

3

3.4

Middle-South Sardinia

210

0

Familial

6

0

Sporadic

204

0

The p16 CDKN2A remained a melanoma susceptibility gene for non-Sardinian patients only; its involvement into the disease was absent among Sardinian patients. Therefore, we investigated whether additional candidate genes, such as BRCA2 and MC1R, might play a role in melanoma susceptibility within such an isolated population. Again, mutation screening for all coding regions and splice boundaries of BRCA2 and MC1R genes was performed as above.

Four (1.3%) out of 301 Sardinian patients were found to carry germline mutations in coding regions of the BRCA2 gene (three cases with BRCA2-8765delAG and the remaining one with BRCA2-Ser2835Pro); conversely, no BRCA2 mutation was observed in a subset of 154 non-Sardinian patients (to avoid any bias, mutation analysis for BRCA2 gene was performed on first 154 consecutively-collected cases from South Italy) (Table 2). Interestingly, all BRCA2 mutations of our series were detected in the subset of patients originating from North Sardinia (4/91; 4.4%); one BRCA2-positive case was among 4 patients with familial recurrence of melanoma, whereas the remaining three (3.4%) BRCA2-positive cases were among 87 patients with sporadic melanoma (Table 2). Both BRCA2 mutations were classified as disease-causing variants due to their predicted effect on proteins; they have been previously reported into the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) database at http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/. Again, all BRCA2 mutations were not detected in normal genomic DNA from 103 unrelated Sardinian healthy individuals (corresponding to 206 control chromosomes). Cases with either familial or sporadic melanoma originating from other areas of the Sardinia island presented no germline mutation in BRCA2 gene (Table 2).

The entire coding region of the MC1R gene was then screened for germline sequence variations in 269 Sardinian melanoma patients (32 cases of our series were excluded because of DNA degradation or low amount of available genomic DNA) and 102 control subjects who were chosen as representative of the individuals living in the same geographical area and comparable for sex, age, general phenotype, and phototype to melanoma patients. Overall, 20 different MC1R variants were found; they were classified according to the effect of the gene sequence variations on the protein function [partial (r) or complete (R) loss of the receptor's signalling ability, as previously reported [20] (Table 3). Two MC1R germline variants classified as "R", Arg151Cys [odds ratio (OR), 6.4; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.1-15.9] and Asp294 His (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3), were significantly associated with melanoma in our series (Table 3). Considering the individuals who were either homozygous or heterozygous for the "R" variant of the MC1R gene, the occurrence of such a "R" allele into the genotype was significantly associated with melanoma (p = 0.043; OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-7.8) (Table 4). No phenotypic parameter in our series of melanoma patients [sex, age of onset, primary tumour location, stage of disease, family history of melanoma, or geographical origin (North vs. Middle-South Sardinia)] was statistically correlated with the presence of the "R" genotype in MC1R gene (data not shown).
Table 3

Distribution of MC1R variants among Sardinian melanomas and controls

MC1R variants

Landi's classification

Positive cases (N = 269)

%

Positive controls (N = 102)

%

P

Val60leu (V60L)

R

88

32.7

32

31.4

n.s.

Ser83Pro (S83P)

R

3

1.1

1

1.0

n.s.

Asp84Glu (D84E)

R

1

0.4

0

0

n.s.

Val92Met (V92M)

R

16

5.9

5

4.9

n.s.

Thr95Met (T95M)

R

3

1.1

1

1.0

n.s.

Gly104Ser (G104S)

R

2

0.7

1

1.0

n.s.

Arg142Cys (R142C)

R

1

0.4

0

0

n.s.

Arg142His (R142H)

R

9

3.3

3

2.9

n.s.

Arg151Cys (R151C)

R

19

7.1

1

1.0

> 0.01

Tyr152Term (Y152Term)

R

1

0.4

0

0

n.s.

Ile155Thr (I155T)

R

4

1.5

2

2.0

n.s.

Arg160Trp (R160W)

R

13

4.8

3

2.9

0.136

Arg163Gln (R163Q)

R

7

2.6

2

2.0

n.s.

Ser172Ile (S172I)

R

1

0.4

0

0

n.s.

Arg213Trp (R213W)

R

5

1.9

1

1.0

n.s.

Ile221Thr (I 221 T)

R

1

0.4

0

0

n.s.

Pro256Ser (P256S)

R

2

0.7

0

0

n.s.

Asp294His (D294H)

R

31

11.5

5

4.9

0.048

Thr308Met (T308M)

R

2

0.7

0

0

n.s.

InsA724

R

2

0.7

0

0

n.s.

MC1R variants with complete loss of function are defined as "R" (in bold), whereas variants with partial loss of function are defined as "r". P values (chi-squared test; two tailed; 95% confidence interval) were given for MC1R-"R" variants only. n.s., not significant

Table 4

Frequency of R-containing genotypes in MC1R gene among Sardinian melanomas and controls

 

Positive cases

 

Subgroups (No. of subjects)

No.

%

P

Patients(269)

   

   R/R or R/r or R/wt genotypes

63

23.4

0.041

Controls(102)

   

   R/R or R/r or R/wt genotypes

9

8.8

 

Pathogenetic alterations in melanoma

A high prevalence of somatic mutations was detected in a subset of paired primary and secondary (lymph node metastasis) melanomas from 35 patients of the series (Table 5). Confirming previously reported data, BRAF and NRAS mutations were mutually exclusive in our patients' collection; overall, BRAF or NRAS mutations were detected in 23/34 (68%) primary tumours and 24/35 (69%) lymph node metastases from the same melanoma patients (Table 5). With the exception of one BRAF mutation (L597R) occurred in metastatic sample only, no difference in rates and types of mutations in BRAF and NRAS genes was observed between primary and secondary tumour tissues from same patients (Table 5). The rate of mutations in p16 CDKN2A gene was found to instead increase from primary to metastatic melanomas of the same patients [5/33 (15%) to 8/35 (23%), respectively] (Table 5); in this sense, an even higher prevalence of p16 CDKN2A alterations [8 (44%) gene mutations or hemi-homozygous exon deletions; 11 (61%) gene down-regulations] was observed in our series of 18 melanoma cell lines (Table 6). Conversely, a quite similar rate of BRAF-NRAS mutations (11/18; 61%) was detected in melanoma cell lines when compared to the uncultured melanomas (Table 6). Again, all detected mutations have been previously reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database at http://archive.uwcm.ac.uk.
Table 5

Somatic mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and p16 CDKN2A genes among in vivo melanoma tissues

Case

Sex

Age at diagnosis

Primary tumour

Lymph node metastasis

   

BRAF

NRAS

p16 CDKN2A

BRAF

NRAS

p16 CDKN2A

MN01

M

43

   

L597R

  

MN02

F

63

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN03

M

51

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN04

M

40

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN06

M

49

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN07

M

39

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN08

F

65

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN09

M

34

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN10

M

67

V600E

 

Arg24Pro

V600E

 

Arg24Pro

MN11

M

84

V600K

  

V600K

  

MN12

M

74

      

MN14

M

41

  

n.t.

   

MN15

M

63

     

Arg80ter

MN18

M

75

      

MN19

M

30

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN20

F

45

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN21

M

35

  

Ala36Thr

  

Ala36Th

MN22

M

71

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN25

F

35

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN26

M

50

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN27

F

48

      

MN28

F

58

 

Q61K

  

Q61K

 

MN29

M

51

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN31

M

40

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN34

F

65

 

Q61R

Ala109Val

 

Q61R

Ala109Val

MN35

M

61

      

MN36

M

64

  

Trp110ter

  

Trp110ter

MN41

F

69

      

MN45

F

56

n.t.

n.t.

n.t.

  

Arg80ter

MN05

M

51

V600E

  

V600E

 

IVS1+1G>A

MN55

F

34

      

MN56

F

36

V600E

  

V600E

  

MN59

F

53

 

Q61K

  

Q61K

 

MN68

M

45

 

Q61R

  

Q61R

 

MN75

F

56

 

Q61R

Arg24Pro

 

Q61R

Arg24Pro

Primary melanomas are in bold. n.t., not tested

Table 6

Genetic and functional alterations in candidate genes among in vitro melanoma cell lines

Cell line

derived from

ERK1

ERK2

pERK

p16

BRAF

NRAS

p16CDKN2A

Primary melanoma

       

GR-Mel

+++

++

+

++

   

LCP-Mel

+++

+++

++

+

V600R

 

Del exon 2

MNG

+++

+++

++/+++

+

   

PNP-Mel

+++

+++

++

+

V600E

 

G101W

ST-Mel

++/+++

+++

+++

++

G466E

  

Metastatic lymph node

       

CN-Mel

+++

+++

++

+

 

Q61R

 

CR-Mel

+++

+++

++

+

 

Q61K

Del exon 2

GL-Mel

+++

+++

++

+

  

Del exon 2

LCM-Mel

+++

++

++

-

V600R

 

Del exons 1-2

MAR

+++

+/++

+

+

   

SK-Mel-28

+++

++

++

+++

V600E

  

13443-Mel

+++

++

+

+++

   

Cutaneous metastasis

       

LB-24-Mel

+++

+++

+++

++

   

M14

+++

+++

++

+

V600E

 

455insCdel26 IVS1+2T>C

PR-Mel

+++

+++

+

++

V600R

  

SN-Mel

++

++/+++

+

++

V600E

  

WM-266-4

+++

++

++/+++

-

V600D

 

Del exon 1

397-Mel

++

++

++

+

  

Del exon 2

No PTENmutation was found in melanoma cell lines

Considering the immunocytochemical results, all melanoma cell lines (7/7; 100%) with concurrent mutation of BRAF-NRAS and down-regulation of p16 CDKN2A presented high expression levels of the activated pERK1-2 protein (Figure 1). The remaining subsets of melanoma cell lines with alterations of one or none of such genes presented lower rates of ERK1-2 phosphorilation [5/8 (62%) and 1/3 (33%), respectively] (Figure 1), suggesting that coexistence of multiple molecular events may be required for activating ERK in melanoma. In Figure 2, the expression of ERK1, ERK2, and pERK1-2 proteins was validated by Western blot hybridization in M14 and PR-Mel melanoma cell lines.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Classification of melanoma cell lines according to alterations in NRAS / BRAF genes and p16 CDKN2A /pERK 1-2 protein expression. Data regarding occurrence of mutations in BRAF/NRAS genes (mut), down-regulation of p16CDKN2A protein (p16-), and over-expression of phosphorilated ERK1-2 protein (pERK1-2+) are indicated. Exemplificative immunochemical results are shown.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Western blot analysis of M14 and PR-Mel melanoma cell lines. Protein lysates from M14 and PR-Mel cells were resolved by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nylon membrane; the proteins on the membrane were then subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies against ERK1-2/pERK1-2 proteins.

Discussion

Melanocytic transformation is thought to occur by sequential accumulation of alterations in several genes and metabolic pathways [8, 30, 31]. In our study, we tried to better define the role of the genes mainly involved in melanoma susceptibility (through the assessment of the prevalence of predisposing germline mutations) and pathogenesis (by investigating somatic gene down- or up-regulations in tumour tissues and cancer cell lines).

Melanoma susceptibility

Assessment of the prevalence of predisposing germline mutations in candidate genes represents an important step toward prevention and early detection of cancers. In this sense, the mutation analysis of p16 CDKN2A , which is the main gene associated with melanoma susceptibility [8, 30], should be considered as a crucial step. Due to environmental and genetic factors, prevalence of p16 CDKN2A mutations has been demonstrated to deeply vary among different populations [10]. A real estimation of the proportion of positive and negative tests that might be expected in a referral risk evaluation clinic is therefore fundamental to provide clinical recommendations for p16 CDKN2A genetic testing.

In our analysis, p16 CDKN2A germline mutations were detected in about 3% (16; 2.9%) out of 545 melanoma patients from southern Italian regions not including Sardinia; in this island, none of the 301 analyzed patient was found to carry a p16 CDKN2A mutation. When Sardinian patients were screened for germline mutations in BRCA2 gene, which seems to play a major role in predisposition to different types of cancer including melanoma (although data are still insufficient, annual skin and eye examinations for early diagnosis of melanoma have been proposed for genetic counselling of BRCA2 carriers) [1114], we exclusively observed a mutated BRCA2 gene in patients originating from North Sardinia (4/91; 4.4%); no BRCA2 germline mutation was observed in 210 patients originating from the remaining areas of the island or in a subset of 154 non-Sardinian melanoma cases (see Table 2). Moreover, we obtained evidence that no sequence variation was present in p15 CDKN2B and CDK4, the remaining two high penetrance melanoma susceptibility genes, among familial melanoma cases from our southern Italian population ([32] and unpublished data). Therefore, the central-southern part of the Sardinia island should be considered as a geographical area in which melanoma patients do not carry mutations in any known major susceptibility gene. Since the incidence rates of melanoma are quite similar in both Sardinian, genetically homogeneous, and non-Sardinian, genetically heterogeneous, populations from South Italy (roughly, 4 new cases per 100.000 inhabitants per year [5]), our findings seem to further confirm that genetic factors predisposing to melanoma are geographically heterogeneous and strictly depending on patients' origin. On this regard, it is worth to underline that Sardinia island has a relatively small and isolated population with a high rate of inbreeding; in comparison to the genetically-heterogeneous Italian population, a higher prevalence of mutations with founder effect has been reported (even for cancer diseases) [33, 34]. Nevertheless, one could speculate that prevalence of mutations in melanoma susceptibility genes needs to be investigated in every different geographical area.

Considering the familial recurrence of melanoma, 48/846 (5.7%) patients from our series presented at least one additional affected member in the family. Overall, seven (14.6%) melanoma families had a detectable mutation in p16 CDKN2A or BRCA2 gene. Also considering some lack of sensitivity of the mutation analysis approach, the prevalence of such germline mutations among patients with familial melanoma from South Italy remains low. However, vast majority of the families included into the present study contains two melanoma patients only; therefore, more stringent selection criteria or subcriteria should be used in order to reduce chances that the identified melanoma families may simply represent a cluster of sporadic cases. As a confirmation of this hypothesis, a consistent increase in prevalence rate of p16 CDKN2A mutations was observed among families with three affected members (3/7; 42.9%). Although large genomic deletions may escape detection by direct sequencing, undetected mutations are unlikely to explain the high number of families without mutations. Therefore, these data further support the hypothesis that additional low-penetrance melanoma susceptibility genes remain to be identified.

Finally, our study confirmed the association of some MC1R gene variants with the occurrence of cutaneous melanoma as previously reported [15, 35, 36]. Despite the MC1R sequence screening was carried out among Sardinian patients only (due to the availability of control subjects representative of the individuals living in the island and comparable for phenotypic features to melanoma patients), the variants classified as "R" and, particularly, the Arg151Cys and Asp294His alleles appeared to be associated with melanoma. Considering the functional outcome, both Arg151Cys and Asp294His variants have been demonstrated to affect the normal signalling of the melanocortin-1 receptor by reducing the ability to elevate the intracellular levels of cAMP [16]. Further and more specific studies (based on better classification of the different skin phototypes and/or a more detailed evaluation of the general phenotypic characteristics) are required in order to define the role of such MC1R gene variants into the susceptibility to melanoma.

Melanoma pathogenesis

We here examined the relationship between alterations in NRAS, BRAF, and p16 CDKN2A genes in both in vivo melanoma tissues (N = 35) from southern Italian patients and in vitro melanoma cell lines (N = 18). We found that mutually exclusive mutations of NRAS and BRAF genes occur at quite same rate in cultured and uncultured melanomas (either primary or metastatic lesions), confirming that they represent an early event within the cascade of alterations involved into the melanomagenesis. However, distribution of mutations in each gene (NRAS or BRAF) deeply varied into the analyzed somatic samples from our series (see Tables 5 and 6), suggesting that pathogenetic alterations may indifferently affect kinases acting either up- or downstream within such a signalling cascade. Moreover, no concurrent mutation of the PTEN gene was observed in melanoma cell lines; this is clearly in contrast with previous data from other series, which reported that such a gene is mutated at a rate of about 30% among in vitro melanomas [37]. Conversely, p16 CDKN2A gene mutations and/or rearrangements (mostly, represented by exon deletions) were observed at increased rates moving from primary to metastatic melanomas and melanoma cell lines (see Tables 5 and 6). Down-regulation or inactivation of the p16 CDKN2A gene (in our series, about two thirds of melanoma cell lines presented a reduced or absent expression of the p16 CDKN2A protein) has been demonstrated to affect the control of cell growth, which may induce cell proliferation and increase aggressiveness of transformed melanocytic cells (melanoma cells tend to inactivate both alleles of such a tumour suppressor gene) [38].

Presence of BRAF mutations in benign and dysplastic nevi [39] supports the hypothesis that activation of the NRAS-BRAF-ERK pathway is not sufficient to induce the malignant process and fully transform proliferating melanocytes, but requires additional, cooperating de-regulative events. In our series, the increased activity of ERK1/2 proteins was mainly a consequence of a combination of mutations in upstream NRAS/BRAF components of the pathway and silencing of the p16 CDKN2A gene (although additional - and yet unidentified - functional alterations may participate in inducing such a ERK activation) (see Figure 1). Therefore, our data provide an additional confirmation that multiple molecular events are being accumulated during melanomagenesis.

Identification of the predominant germline mutations in candidate susceptibility genes within a particular geographical area has particular relevance to achieve a prediction of the melanoma risk as well as to address patients and their families to clinical screening. On this regard, a dramatic improvement toward an earlier diagnosis of melanoma could be represented by the selection of specific high-risk groups to be appropriately targeted (since routine screening for detection of thinner melanoma can not be indiscriminately proposed). Familial melanoma patients are reported to present with thinner melanomas [8]. As also indicated above, different classifications of familial melanoma have been used by several authors, based on number (two cases with additional and various subcriteria or at least three cases) and type (involvement of first- and/or second-degree relatives) of affected family members. Regardless the occurrence of a weak or strong family history, relatives of melanoma patients carrying germline mutations in susceptibility genes could represent a high risk group which might undergo a surveillance program for identification of thinner melanoma. Our experience seems to support this hypothesis. Considering the non-Sardinian melanoma patients (whose series was the only one in which we detected p16 CDKN2A germline mutations), first- and second-degree relatives of p16 CDKN2A mutation carriers were informed to belong to a putative high risk group (through specific educational sessions, after obtaining an informed consent) and addressed to a short-term (6 months) surveillance program using epiluminescence microscopy. After a median follow-up of 78 months (range, 37-109), six new melanomas with median Breslow thickness of 0.35 mm (range, 0.25-0.68) were observed among such relatives of p16 CDKN2A mutation-positive patients (it is important to underline that patients with very thin melanomas - Breslow thickness ≤ 0.40 mm - present a 10-year survival rate which is estimated to be more than 98% [40, 41]). Although the number of events for more mature and definitive results is really low, we could speculate that the identification of a melanoma patient carrying a p16 CDKN2A germline mutation should induce clinicians to educate his family members to have a great care of all skin lesions and pay high attention to noticing any nevi' modification as well as to address them to a routine screening for detection of thinner melanoma.

Conclusion

Although most genetic and molecular alterations have been identified, characterization of all interactions between key effectors in MAPK, CDKN2A, and additional (i.e. PTEN-AKT) pathways will represent the aims of future research efforts, in order to further clarify the sequence of events inducing transformation of melanocytes and progression of melanoma.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Other investigators involved in this study and considered as co-authors: Carlo Mulas, Daniela Capra (Ospedale Oncologico Businco, Cagliari, Italy); Maria P. Satta (Istituto Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy); Antonio Vozza (Seconda Università, Napoli, Italy). Members of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI): Vanna Chiaron Sileni, Franco Di Filippo, Michele Maio, Giorgio Parmiani, Paola Queirolo, Ruggero Ridolfi, CarloRiccardo Rossi, Alessandro Testori. We thank Assunta Criscuolo, for data management. Authors are grateful to patients for their important contribution to this study. Work was supported by Italian Ministry of Health "Progetto Ricerca Finalizzata", Schering-Plough Inc., and Sardinia Regional Government (Regione Autonoma della Sardegna).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Sassari, Italy
(2)
Oncologia Medica 1, Ospedale Oncologico Businco, Cagliari, Italy
(3)
Servizio di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Sassari, Italy
(4)
Servizio di Epidemiologia, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 1, Sassari, Italy
(5)
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
(6)
Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Roma, Italy
(7)
Istituto Tumori Romagna, Meldola, Forli, Italy
(8)
Associazione House Hospital Onlus, Napoli, Italy

References

  1. de Vries E, Coebergh JW: Melanoma incidence has risen in Europe. BMJ. 2005, 331: 698-10.1136/bmj.331.7518.698.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lipsker D, Engel F, Cribier B, Velten M, Hedelin G: Trends in melanoma epidemiology suggest three different types of melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2007, 157: 338-343. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08029.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Welch HG, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM: Skin biopsy rates and incidence of melanoma: population based ecological study. BMJ. 2005, 331: 481-10.1136/bmj.38516.649537.E0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. de Vries E, Bray FI, Coebergh JW, Parkin DM: Changing epidemiology of malignant cutaneous melanoma in Europe 1969-1997 rising trends in incidence and mortality, but recent stabilisations in western Europe and decreases in Scandinavia. Int J Cancer. 2003, 107: 119-126. 10.1002/ijc.11360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P, eds: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. 2007, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Scientific Publications, No. 160 Lyon, IARC, IX:Google Scholar
  6. Bataille V: Genetic epidemiology of melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 1341-1347. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00313-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jhappan C, Noonan FP, Merlino G: Ultraviolet radiation and cutaneous malignant melanoma. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 3099-3112. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206450.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF: Cutaneous melanoma. The Lancet. 2005, 365: 687-701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho E, Rosner BA, Feskanich D, Colditz GA: Risk factors and individual probabilities of melanoma for whites. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 2669-2675. 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, Bergman W, Bishop JN, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Chompret A, Ghiorzo P, Gruis N, Hansson J, Harland M, Hayward N, Holland EA, Mann GJ, Mantelli M, Nancarrow D, Platz A, Tucker MA, Melanoma Genetics Consortium: Geographical variation in penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 894-903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Casula M, Colombino M, Satta MP, Cossu A, Lissia A, Budroni M, Simeone E, Calemma R, Loddo C, Caracò C, Mozzillo N, Daponte A, Comella G, Canzanella S, Guida M, Castello G, Ascierto PA, Palmieri G: Factors predicting the occurrence of germline mutations in candidate genes among patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma from South Italy. Eur J Cancer. 2007, 43: 137-143. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium: Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 1310-1316. 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liede A, Karlan BY, Narod SA: Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 735-742. 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sinilnikova OM, Egan KM, Quinn JL, Boutrand L, Lenoir GM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Desjardins L, Levy C, Goldgar D, Gragoudas ES: Germline BRCA2 sequence variants in patients with ocular melanoma. Int J Cancer. 1999, 82: 325-328. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990730)82:3<325::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kennedy C, ter Huurne J, Berkhout M, Gruis N, Bastiaens M, Bergman W, Willemze R, Bavinck JN: Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants are associated with an increased risk for cutaneous melanoma which is largely independent of skin type and hair color. J Invest Dermatol. 2001, 117: 294-300. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01421.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Debniak T, Scott RJ, Górski B, Cybulski C, Wetering van de T, Serrano-Fernandez P, Huzarski T, Byrski T, Nagay L, Debniak B, Kowalska E, Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Wokolorczyk D, Maleszka R, Kładny J, Lubinski J: Common variants of DNA repair genes and malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44: 110-114. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Beaumont KA, Shekar SN, Newton RA, James MR, Stow JL, Duffy DL, Sturm RA: Receptor function, dominant negative activity and phenotype correlations for MC1R variant alleles. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16: 2249-2260. 10.1093/hmg/ddm177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raimondi S, Sera F, Gandini S, Iodice S, Caini S, Maisonneuve P, Fargnoli MC: MC1R variants, melanoma and red hair color phenotype: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008, 122: 2753-2760. 10.1002/ijc.23396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanetsky PA, Rebbeck TR, Hummer AJ, Panossian S, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Marrett LD, Millikan RC, Gruber SB, Culver HA, Zanetti R, Gallagher RP, Dwyer T, Busam K, From L, Mujumdar U, Wilcox H, Begg CB, Berwick M: Population-based study of natural variation in the melanocortin-1 receptor gene and melanoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 9330-9337. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1634.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Landi MT, Bauer J, Pfeiffer RM, Elder DE, Hulley B, Minghetti P, Calista D, Kanetsky PA, Pinkel D, Bastian BC: MC1R germline variants confer risk for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Science. 2006, 313: 521-522. 10.1126/science.1127515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Box NF, Duffy DL, Irving RE, Russell A, Chen W, Griffyths LR, Parsons PG, Green AC, Sturm RA: Melanocortin-1 receptor genotype is a risk factor for basal and squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2001, 116: 224-229. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01224.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, Patel HN, Busam KJ, Kutzner H, Cho KH, Aiba S, Bröcker EB, LeBoit PE, Pinkel D, Bastian BC: Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 2135-2147. 10.1056/NEJMoa050092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsao H, Zhang X, Fowlkes K, Haluska FG: Relative reciprocity of NRAS and PTEN/MMAC1 alterations in cutaneous melanoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1800-1804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sensi M, Nicolini G, Petti C, Bersani I, Lozupone F, Molla A, Vegetti C, Nonaka D, Mortarini R, Parmiani G, Fais S, Anichini A: Mutually exclusive NRASQ61R and BRAFV600E mutations at the single-cell level in the same human melanoma. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 3357-3364. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmieri G, Casula M, Sini MC, Ascierto PA, Cossu A: Issues affecting molecular staging in the management of patients with melanoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2007, 11: 1052-1068. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00091.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W, Davis N, Dicks E, Ewing R, Floyd Y, Gray K, Hall S, Hawes R, Hughes J, Kosmidou V, Menzies A, Mould C, Parker A, Stevens C, Watt S, Hooper S, Wilson R, Jayatilake H, Gusterson BA, Cooper C, Shipley J, Hargrave D, Pritchard-Jones K, Maitland N, Chenevix-Trench G, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Palmieri G, Cossu A, Flanagan A, Nicholson A, Ho J, Leung SY, Yuen ST, Weber BL, Seigler HF, Darrow TL, Paterson H, Marais R, Marshall CJ, Wooster R, Stratton MR, Futreal PA: Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002, 417: 949-954. 10.1038/nature00766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Smalley KSM: A pivotal role for ERK in the oncogenic behaviour of malignant melanoma?. Int J Cancer. 2003, 104: 527-532. 10.1002/ijc.10978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Palomba G, Pisano M, Cossu A, Budroni M, Dedola MF, Farris A, Contu A, Baldinu P, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Spectrum and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Sardinian breast cancer patients through a hospital-based screening. Cancer. 2005, 104: 1172-1179. 10.1002/cncr.21298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Budroni M, Cesaraccio R, Coviello V, Sechi O, Pirino D, Cossu A, Tanda F, Pisano M, Palomba G, Palmieri G: Role of BRCA2 mutation status on overall survival among breast cancer patients from Sardinia. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 62-10.1186/1471-2407-9-62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayward NK: Genetics of melanoma predisposition. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 3053-3062. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolchok JD, Saenger YM: Current topics in melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007, 19: 116-120. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32801497c6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Casula M, Ascierto PA, Cossu A, Sini MC, Tore S, Colombino M, Satta MP, Manca A, Rozzo C, Satriano SMR, Castello G, Lissia A, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Mutation analysis of candidate genes in melanoma-prone families: evidence of different pathogenetic mechanisms at chromosome 9p21. Melanoma Res. 2003, 13: 571-579. 10.1097/00008390-200312000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright AF, Carothers AD, Pirastu M: Population choice in mapping genes for complex diseases. Nat Genet. 1999, 23: 397-404. 10.1038/70501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Palomba G, Cossu A, Friedman E, Budroni M, Farris A, Contu A, Pisano M, Baldinu P, Sini MC, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Origin and distribution of the BRCA2-8765delAG mutation in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007, 7: 132-10.1186/1471-2407-7-132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer JS, Duffy DL, Box NF, Aitken JF, O'Gorman LE, Green AC, Hayward NK, Martin NG, Sturm RA: Melanocortin-1 receptor polymorphisms and risk of melanoma: is the association explained solely by pigmentation phenotype?. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 66: 176-186. 10.1086/302711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Landi MT, Kanetsky PA, Tsang S, Gold B, Munroe D, Rebbeck T, Swoyer J, Ter-Minassian M, Hedayati M, Grossman L, Goldstein AM, Calista D, Pfeiffer RM: MC1R, ASIP, and DNA repair in sporadic and familial melanoma in a Mediterranean population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 998-1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Goel VK, Lazar AJ, Warneke CL, Redston MS, Haluska FG: Examination of mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and PTEN in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2006, 126: 154-160. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Haluska FG, Tsao H, Wu H, Haluska FS, Lazar A, Goel V: Genetic alterations in signaling pathways in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 2301-2307. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2518.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pollock PM, Harper UL, Hansen KS, Yudt LM, Stark M, Robbins CM, Moses TY, Hostetter G, Wagner U, Kakareka J, Salem G, Pohida T, Heenan P, Duray P, Kallioniemi O, Hayward NK, Trent JM, Meltzer PS: High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nat Genet. 2003, 33: 19-20. 10.1038/ng1054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McKinnon JG, Yu XQ, McCarthy WH, Thompson JF: Prognosis for patients with thin cutaneous melanoma: long-term survival data from New South Wales Central Cancer Registry and the Sydney Melanoma Unit. Cancer. 2003, 98: 1223-1231. 10.1002/cncr.11624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gimotty PA, Elder DE, Fraker DL, Botbyl J, Sellers K, Elenitsas R, Ming ME, Schuchter L, Spitz FR, Czerniecki BJ, Guerry D: Identification of high-risk patients among those diagnosed with thin cutaneous melanomas. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 1129-1134. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/352/prepub

Copyright

© Casula et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement