Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Expression of TRPC6 channels in human epithelial breast cancer cells

  • Arnaud Guilbert1,
  • Isabelle Dhennin-Duthille1,
  • Yassine EL Hiani1,
  • Nathalie Haren1,
  • Hafida Khorsi2,
  • Henri Sevestre1, 3,
  • Ahmed Ahidouch1, 4 and
  • Halima Ouadid-Ahidouch1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer20088:125

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-125

Received: 24 October 2007

Accepted: 02 May 2008

Published: 02 May 2008

Abstract

Background

TRP channels have been shown to be involved in tumour generation and malignant growth. However, the expression of these channels in breast cancer remains unclear. Here we studied the expression and function of endogenous TRPC6 channels in a breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), a human breast cancer epithelial primary culture (hBCE) and in normal and tumour breast tissues.

Methods

Molecular (Western blot and RT-PCR), and immunohistochemical techniques were used to investigate TRPC6 expression. To investigate the channel activity in both MCF-7 cells and hBCE we used electrophysiological technique (whole cell patch clamp configuration).

Results

A non selective cationic current was activated by the oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) in both hBCE and MCF-7 cells. OAG-inward current was inhibited by 2-APB, SK&F 96365 and La3+. TRPC6, but not TRPC7, was expressed both in hBCE and in MCF-7 cells. TRPC3 was only expressed in hBCE. Clinically, TRPC6 mRNA and protein were elevated in breast carcinoma specimens in comparison to normal breast tissue. Furthermore, we found that the overexpression of TRPC6 protein levels were not correlated with tumour grades, estrogen receptor expression or lymph node positive tumours.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that TRPC6 channels are strongly expressed and functional in breast cancer epithelial cells. Moreover, the overexpression of these channels appears without any correlation with tumour grade, ER expression and lymph node metastasis. Our findings support the idea that TRPC6 may have a role in breast carcinogenesis.

Background

Breast cancer has the highest incidence rate for cancer in women in industrialized countries. Statistically, it is estimated that one woman out of ten will develop breast cancer at some point in her life. Evidence is accumulating for the role of ion channels in the development of cancer. The most studied ion channels in breast cancer are firstly K+ channels, which are involved in proliferation, cell cycle progression and migration [14], and secondly Na+ channels which correlate with invasion [57]. Apart from the role of intracellular calcium in MCF-7 apoptosis [8], little is known of Ca2+ homeostasis in breast cancer cells. The first study reported by Strobl et al., [9], suggested that Ca2+ is necessary for the cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells. Moreover, the early findings of Sergeev indicate that voltage-insensitive channels and Ca2+ endoplasmic reticulum stores are the principal pathways for Ca2+ entry in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line [8, 10]. Recently, Guo et al., [11], have reported that the inhibition of a voltage-independent calcium channel induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. However, until now, the channel types involved in this cationic current have remained unknown. Recent findings demonstrate that the expression and/or activity of the TRP superfamily, have been reported to be involved in colorectal, colon, thyroid, breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer [12, 13]. Among these, prostate cancer has been the most studied [12, 1417]. Indeed, TRPV6 is strongly expressed in advanced prostate cancer, with no expression either in healthy or in benign prostate tissues [17]. Moreover, the TRPV6 expression correlates with the Gleason score [18], and with aggressiveness [14, 16, 18]. Another type of TRP: TRPM8 was detected at high levels in both benign prostate hyperplasia and in prostate carcinoma cells, as well as at low levels in normal (non-carcinoma) prostate epithelial cells. According to these data, TRPM8 has recently been proposed as a molecular target [13, 19] and TRPV6 as a general marker for neoplasma [15, 20].

The TRPC subfamily, TRPC1 TRPC7, has mostly been implicated in regulation by G-proteins and metabolites of phosphoinositide hydrolysis. TRPC6 channels, known to be activated by the phospholipase C (PLC) product, Diacylglycerol (DAG) [2124], is abundantly expressed and plays an important role in lung tissues and in different smooth muscle cell types [22, 2527].

TRPC6 was suggested as being the molecular correlate to the α1-adrenoceptor-activated non-selective cation channel in vascular smooth muscle cells [24, 28]. Moreover, TRPC6 is also involved in some smooth and cardiac muscle pathologies [27, 29, 30]. TRPC6 is also expressed in epithelial human prostatic cancer cells and the Ca2+-entry via this channel mediates the activation of calcineurin, which in turn induces proliferation via its downstream NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells) transcription factors, which are necessary and sufficient for the induction of prostatic cancer cell proliferation [31].

Previously, we have reported that TRPC6 is expressed in MCF-7 [32]. However, until now, little is known about the relative expression of TRPC6 in normal and cancerous breast cells.

The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to compare the expression of TRPC6 in normal and cancerous human breast tissues. On the other hand, we have sought to investigate the role of TRPC6 by using electrophysiological and molecular techniques. To do this, we used breast tissue specimens, primary cultures of human breast cancer epithelial (hBCE) cells and MCF-7 cell line.

Methods

Cell culture

MCF-7 cells were cultured in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM), supplemented with 5% foetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.06 % Hepes buffer, and maintained at 37°C in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Immunohistochemistry

Normal and cancerous breast tissues were obtained from fresh surgical specimens. Surgical consent forms (approved by the University Hospital of Amiens) were signed by the patients before surgery to allow the use of a portion of the tissue for research purposes.

49 normal and cancer human breast specimens were obtained from women having undergone operations at the Amiens Hospital, France. Normal breast samples were taken at a distance from the tumour. Regarding tumour grade in the 49 invasive ductal breast carcinomas, 15 were of Grade I (well-differentiated), 19 were of Grade II (moderately-differentiated) and 15 were of Grade III (poorly-differentiated). On diagnosis, 23 tumours presented lymph-node metastasis.

Immunohistochemical studies were performed using the indirect immuno-peroxidase staining technique on the paraffin-embedded material with a Ventana ES automatic analyzer (Ventana Medical Systems) and with a hematoxylin counterstain. Briefly, after blocking the endogenous peroxidase by the I-View Inhibitor (Ventana), sections were stained with an anti-TRPC6 antibody (Chemicon, 1/300) for 32 min, washed, incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (I-View Biotin Ig, Ventana) for 8 min, washed and exposed to streptavidine-peroxidase complex (I-View SA-HRP, Ventana) for 8 min. DAB/H2O2 was used as chromogen and the slides were then examined under optical microscopy. Micrograph acquisitions were performed by a camera connected to a Zeiss microscope equipped with 20 × 0.85 objective lens.

Immunostaining levels in the tumour tissue were determined by subjective visual scoring of the brown stain, and compared to the normal tissue. Scoring levels were: 0 = absence of staining; 1 = weak staining intensity (equal to normal tissue); 2 = moderate; 3 = strong staining intensity. For the quantitative analysis, we report the percentage of cases presenting an overexpression of TRPC6 (scores 2 and 3).

Peptide blocking was performed as follows. The TRPC6 peptide (1 μg, Chemicon) was incubated with the primary antibody (1 μg) for one hour at room temperature. The complex was then applied to the sections in place of the diluted primary antibody and staining was completed as already described.

Primary culture

Portions of human breast cancerous tissues were placed in transport medium and desegregated immediately or after storage at 4°C for less than 6 h. The transport medium contained RPMI 1640 medium, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 10% FBS and 0.010 mg/ml insulin. Adipose or gross and necrotic materials were removed and the tissue minced using a scalpel in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) pH 7.4 under sterile conditions. Cancerous tissues were digested in transport medium containing 1 mg/ml collagenase type I (Sigma, France) and 100 U/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma, France) overnight at 37°C. When digestion was completed, tissue suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and the pellets resuspended in sterile PBS pH 7.4. The dispersed cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and pellets resuspended in 20% FBS growth medium (RPMI 1640 medium, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 0.005 mg/ml insulin, 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 5 μg/ml transferrin, 0.1 μM isoproterenol, 0.01 μM ethanolamine, 0.01 μM o-phosphoetanolamine) and seeded in culture flasks (Nunc, Poly Labo, Strasbourg, France) and kept at 37°C in a humidified incubator in a 95% air 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each sample was analyzed by immuno-fluorescence staining to verify the pan-cytokeratin expression, which is an epithelial marker.

We used specimens from invasive ductal breast carcinomas and clinical tumour (Grade II), from patients having undergone a mastectomy. None of the patients had a history of chemotherapy and/or anti-estrogens therapy. The absence of normal epithelial cells was confirmed by independent histologic and anatomopathologic analysis.

Electrophysiology

For electrophysiological analysis, cells were cultured in 35 mm Petri dishes at a density of 5.104 cells 2 days before patch clamp experiments. Currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode, using an Axopatch 200 B patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular devices) and a Digidata 1200 interface (Molecular device). PClamp software (v. 6.03, Molecular device) was used to control voltage, as well as to acquire and analyze data. The whole-cell mode of the patch-clamp technique was used with 3–5 MΩ resistance borosilicate fire-polished pipettes (Hirschmann®, Laborgerate). Seal resistance was typically in the 1–5 GΩ range. Whole cell currents were allowed to stabilize for 5 min before being measured. Cells were allowed to settle in Petri dishes placed at the opening of a 250 μm-inner diameter capillary for extra-cellular perfusions. The cell under investigation was continuously superfused with control or test solutions. All electrophysiological experiments were performed at room temperature.

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription of RNA

Total RNA from MCF-7 cells and primary culture cells was extracted by the Trizol-phenol-chloroforme (Sigma Aldrich) procedure, including DNAse I treatment (0.2 U/μl, 30 min at 37°C, Promega). Total RNA was then reverse-transcribed into cDNA using oligodT primers and SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen).

RNA isolation of normal and tumour tissues was performed using the RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Pieces of tissue (20 mg) were placed in a lysis buffer and homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer (PRO-200, Fisher Bioblock Scientific), and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer s standard protocols and used (1 μg) for first-strand cDNA synthesis with oligodT primers and MultiScribeTM Reverse Transcriptase (Applied Biosystems).

Qualitative and semi-quantitative PCR

Sense and antisense PCR primers specific to TRPC3, TRPC6, TRPC7 channels, β-actin and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) were used (see Table 1: primers for PCR experiments). PCR reactions were carried out on a iCycler thermal cycler (Biorad) using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) using the following parameters: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. A total of 30 cycles for actin and 40 cycles for the other primers were performed, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis with 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Table 1

Primers for PCR experiments

Gene

Accession n°

Primer

Sequence (5-3)

Predicted Size, bp

hTRPC3

NM003305

Sense

GGAAAAACATTACCTCCACCTTTCA

 
  

Antisense

CTCAGTTGCTTGGCTCTTGTCTTCC

383 pb

hTRPC6

NM 004621

Sense

GAACTTAGCAATGAACTGGCAGT

625 pb for TRPC6

  

Antisense

CATATCATGCCTATTACCCAGGA

277 pb for TRPC6γ

hTRPC7

NM 020389

Sense

GTCCGAATGCAAGGAAATCT

 
  

Antisense

TGGGTTGTATTTGGCACCTC

477 pb

hβ-actin

NM 001101

Sense

CAGAGCAAGAGAGGCATCCT

 
  

Antisense

ACGTACATGGCTGGGGTG

210 pb

hCK19

NM 002276

Sense

GATTGCCACCTACCGC

 
  

Antisense

CCATCCCTCTACCCAG

136 pb

For the semi-quantitative experiments, 40 cycles, 25 cycles and 35 cycles were performed for TRPC6, β-actin and CK19 respectively. After agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR products were quantified using Quantity One software (Biorad) and expressed as the ratio of TRPC6 on β-actin or CK19 referent genes. CK19 has been shown to be specific to breast epithelial cells, both normal and malignant [33].

Western Blotting

Prostate human cancer cell line (LNCaP), MCF-7 cells and primary culture cells were lysed for 30 min on ice in RIPA buffer (1% triton ×100, 1% Na deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM PO4Na2/K pH 7.2) supplemented with Sigma P8340 inhibitor cocktail, 2 mM EDTA and 5 mM Na orthovanadate. After centrifugation at 13000 rpm, the proteins in the supernatant were quantified using the BCA method (Biorad).

Breast tissue proteins were extracted using the WCE buffer (Whole Cell Extract : 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris HCl pH7.5, 1% NP40) supplemented with Sigma P8340 inhibitors cocktail, 0.1% SDS and 1 mM Na orthovanadate. After 1 hour in lysis buffer at 4°C, tissues were homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer (PRO-200, Fisher Bioblock Scientific) and frozen 20 min at -80°C. After centrifugation at 13000 rpm, the proteins in the supernatant were quantified using the BCA method (Biorad).

Equal amounts of each protein sample (15–20 μg) were separated by electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham). Blots were incubated with antibodies raised against TRPC6 (1/300, Chemicon) or β-actin (1/1000, Santa Cruz) and developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham) using specific peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG secondary antibodies. Peptide blocking was performed as described in the immunohistochemistry section.

Solutions

External and internal solutions had the following compositions (in mM): External: NaCl 140, KCl 5, MgCl2 2, CaCl2 2, HEPES 10 and glucose 5 at pH 7.4 (NaOH). Internal: CsCl 140, CaCl2 5, ATP-K2 1, HEPES 10, EGTA 10, MgCl2 2, at pH 7.2 (CsOH). The [Ca2+]i was clamped to 85 nM and calculated with WebMaxC v2.1 (please see Availability & requirements section below).

Extracellular and intracellular osmolarity measured with a freezing-point depression were 300 mOs and 292 mOs respectively. In order to completely block K+ channels, we added TEA at 5 mM to the extracellular medium. 2-APB, SK&F 96365 and OAG (Sigma, France) were dissolved in DMSO. Final concentrations were obtained by appropriate dilution in an external control solution. The final DMSO concentration was < 0.1%.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± S.E. The Student s t test was used to compare the relative TRPC6 transcripts in normal and cancer tissues. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Immunostaining in the epithelial compartment of tumour tissues compared to normal tissues was scored visually as equal expression or overexpression of TRPC6. χ2 tests were used in GraphPad Software to estimate the correlation between TRPC6 overexpression and clinical characteristics of the carcinoma tissues. A correlation was considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

OAG induced a non-selective cationic current in the MCF-7 breast cell line

We have previously reported that TRPC6 is the detectable member of the store-independent TRPC channels expressed in breast cancer cells [32]. Recent studies have revealed that the permeant DAG analogue, OAG can stimulate an inward current in cancerous epithelial cells [31]. We recorded OAG-induced channel activity in MCF-7 cells using the whole cell patch clamp configuration, replacing K+ with Cs+ to block K+ channels and using a high [Ca2+]i to prevent the passive intracellular Ca2+ store depletion that could lead to activation of store operated channels (SOC, Isoc current) (Fig. 1). An application of 50 μM of OAG to the bath induced a linear current in MCF-7 cells. The current/voltage dependence of this OAG-induced current displayed both inward and outward currents (Fig. 1A). This current revealed a pattern of a non-selective cation current (Fig. 1A) with a reversal potential close to 0 mV (7.2 ± 1.4, n = 12). The average density of OAG-induced current measured at -100 mV varied between -25 and -12.5 pA/pF with a mean of -18.3 ± 2.7 pA/pF (n = 10). The time course for OAG-induced current at -100 mV revealed an inward current which reached a peak in about 3 min (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

Electrophysiological and Pharmacological characterisation of the OAG-induced current in MCF-7 cell line. A) Typical current trace recorded during the current induced by 50 μM OAG. The holding potential was -40 mV and 400 ms voltage ramps were applied from -100 mV to +100 mV. The reversal potential (Erev) of the currents recorded was about 0 mV. B) Time course development of OAG-inward currents (measured at -100 mV) in a representative MCF-7 cell bathed in external control medium. C-D) 2-APB (50 and 100 μM) and La3+ (100 μM) effects on time course of OAG-induced current recorded at -100 mV. E) The extracellular perfusion of SK&F 96365 (10 μM) completely inhibited the current induced by OAG (50 μM).

Pharmacological properties of the OAG-induced current

A number of pharmacological agents have been used to characterize DAG-induced currents or Ca2+ entry pathways in a variety of cell types [34]. Here we show that 2-APB reduced and completely inhibited the OAG-induced current in MCF-7 cells when used at 50 μM and 100 μM respectively (Fig. 1CD, n = 4), and this effect was totally reversed after washout (Fig. 1D). Moreover, the OAG-sensitive current was also completely inhibited by 100 μM La3+ (Fig. 1CD, n = 6) and by 10 μM SK&F 96365 (Fig. 1E, n = 3).

OAG also induced a cationic current in primary epithelial breast human cells (hBCE)

A typical OAG-induced current could also be recorded in hBCE cells. A representative example is shown in Fig. 2AB. The average density of the OAG-induced current measured at -100 mV varied between -50 and -20.6 pA/pF with a mean of -34.3 ± 4.6 pA/pF (n = 7). The current that we recorded had a Erev about 0 mV (6.0 ± 2.4 mV, (n = 4)) and was again reduced by 50 μM 2-APB (Fig. 2C, n = 6) or completely blocked by 100 μM 2-APB (Fig. 2D, n = 6) and by La3+ (100 μM, n = 6) (Fig. 2CE).
Figure 2

OAG mediated an inward cationic current in primary hBCE. A) Current-potential relationship in the absence and presenceof OAG (50 μM). The holding potential was -40 mV and 400 ms voltage ramps were applied from -100 mV to +100 mV. B) Time course of the inward whole-cell membrane current activated by OAG (50 μM). C-E) Effects of the common cationic channels inhibitors, 2-APB 50 μM (C), 100 μM (D), and 100 μM La3+ (C, E) on the amplitude of OAG-induced inward current measured at -100 mV.

Expression of OAG-gated TRP channels in human breast cancer epithelial cells

TRPC3, TRPC6 and TRPC7 are reported to be directly gated by DAG and OAG [23, 35]. Therefore, in order to determine potential candidates for the OAG-coupled cationic channel(s) in hBCE, we used RT-PCR to analyse the expression of the specific transcripts for the human isoforms of these DAG-gated TRP members in these cells. As expected, MCF-7 cells expressed only TRPC6 while hBCE expressed both TRPC6 and TRPC3 transcripts (Fig. 3A), whereas TRPC7 was undetectable (Fig. 3B) in either cell. The prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP) was used as a positive control for TRPC3 and a negative one for TRPC6. Indeed, it has been reported that LNCaP cells express TRPC3 but not TRPC6 [36]. Moreover, both MCF-7 and hBCE cells express a TRPC6γ splice variant (Fig. 3A).
Figure 3

Analysis of TRPC3, TRPC6 and TRPC7 mRNA expression in MCF-7 and hBCE cells. RT-PCR analysis of the expression of human TRPC3, TRPC6 (A), and TRPC7 (B) transcripts in hBCE and MCF-7 cells. The PCR products were obtained using the primers described in Table 1. Rat brain and the human prostate cancer epithelial cell line (LNCaP) were used as positive controls for the detection of TRPC7, and TRPC3 respectively. LNCaP was also used as negative control for TRPC6.

TRPC6 is expressed in breast tumour tissues

No data are available on the expression of TRPC6 in human carcinoma tissue. Fig. 4 shows the expression of the transcripts for the TRPC6 in human breast tissue (Fig. 4A). Moreover, we also observed the expression of the TRPC6γ splice variant. Using Western blotting, we found that the TRPC6 proteins were expressed in breast carcinoma (Fig. 4B). There was no band when we omitted the primary antibody or when we blocked the TRPC6 antibody with the TRPC6 peptide (Fig. 4B). Moreover, TRPC6 is also expressed at a protein level both in MCF-7 cells and in hBCE (Fig. 4C). Again, there was no band when we used lysate from LNCaP (Fig. 4C).
Figure 4

Expression of TRPC6 in human breast cancer. A) Expression pattern of TRPC6 mRNA. The PCR products were observed in 3 human tumour breast tissues. A representative Western blot of TRPC6 (around 97 kDa) was performed on breast tumour tissues (B), MCF-7 and hBCE cells (C). TRPC6 Ab : TRPC6 antibody; (-) incubation of tumour tissue protein lysates with only the second antibody; (+ peptide) protein lysates are incubated with a mixture of TRPC6 antibody and TRPC6 peptide. Protein lysates from LNCaP cells were used as negative control (C).

Overexpression of TRPC6 in breast adenocarcinoma

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 49 normal tissues and ductal breast carcinomas. Normal breast specimens were obtained from mammectomy specimens, at a distance from the tumour. High expression of TRPC6 was detected in tissue of breast cancer and small or negative expression was detected in normal tissue. The frequency of TRPC6 expression in breast cancer averaged 73.4% (36/49) of the cases studied. Fig. 5A shows representative positive expression of neoplastic tissue of breast cancer. The staining of breast adenocarcinoma (a2) demonstrated a stronger positive reaction than its normal counterpart (a1). There was no or little staining when the primary antibody was omitted (b1, b2), or after preincubation of TRPC6 peptide with the primary antibody (c1, c2).
Figure 5

Overexpression of TRPC6 in breast adenocarcinoma. A) Normal (a1) and tumour (a2) breast tissues show a respectively weaker and a stronger staining when incubated with TRPC6 antibody. (b1) and (b2) are the same field showing no staining when the primary antibody was omitted. TRPC6 staining of normal (c1) and tumour (c2) breast tissue was blocked by the preincubation of TRPC6 peptide with the primary antibody. (magnification, × 200). B) TRPC6 transcripts were detected in breast tissues (N = normal, T = tumour) by semi-quantitative PCR using TRPC6, β-actin, or CK19 primers. C) Relative TRPC6 expression in breast cancer tissues. TRPC6 mRNA was quantified using Quantity One software and normalized to β-actin or CK19 expression. Data are presented as the average of duplicate experiments on three distinct patients (* P < 0.05).

Using semi-quantitative PCR, we analyzed TRPC6 mRNA expression in tumour and normal tissues from 3 individual patients. As shown in Fig. 5B &5C, TRPC6 mRNA expression was generally higher in the tumour tissues after normalization both with CK19 or β-actin (P < 0.05).

We next compared the expression of TRPC6 with LNM, estrogen receptor (ER) expression, and tumour grade. A quantitative analysis, using χ 2 statistical test, of the results obtained is reported in Table 2. The TRPC6 protein expression was similar in tumour tissues associated (78%, n = 23) or not associated (69%, n = 26) with LNM. Non significant differences in the TRPC6 expression were also found with estrogen receptor expression. Regarding TRPC6 channel protein expression with tumour grade, we found that TRPC6 was expressed in 73.3% and 68.4% of grade I and grade II respectively, and increased to 80% in grade III.
Table 2

Comparison of TRPC6 expression to tumour characteristics on 49 patients using χ2 analysis.

 

TRPC6 overexpression

n

X 2

LNM status

   

   LNM

78.3%

23

 

   no LNM

69.2%

26

0.4749

ER status

   

   ER+

70.9%

31

 

   ER-

81.8%

11

0.5180

Tumor grade

   

   1

73.3%

15

 

   2

68.4%

19

0.4473

   3

80%

15

0.4473

Absence of significant statistical correlation between TRPC6 overexpression and tumour characteristics (LNM: lymph node metastasis; ER: estrogen receptor).

Discussion

Many recent works report the involvement of TRP channels in cancer. Our results point towards an aberrant expression of TRPC6 channels in breast cancer. This study shows that TRPC6 is expressed in both the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and in the primary cultures of breast cancer epithelial cells. TRPC6 appears to be functional both in MCF-7 and in hBCE. Moreover, TRPC6 is highly expressed in breast carcinoma and is not correlated with estrogen receptor expression, tumour grade, or LNM.

Our results demonstrate that the OAG-activated cationic channels both in hBCE and MCF-7 cells share the same electrophysiological (lack of voltage dependence, and a similar reversal potential) and pharmacological properties (sensitivity to 2-APB, La3+ and SK&F 96365). The TRPC candidates activated by OAG are limited to TRPC3, TRPC6, and TRPC7 [23, 35]. TRPC6 is expressed at mRNA and protein levels both in MCF-7 and hBCE cells. Moreover, TRPC3 is also expressed in hBCE and its expression seems weak compared to that of the TRPC6 (Fig. 3A). However, the findings that hBCE cells express both TRPC3 and TRPC6, may indicate that the OAG-gated cationic channel(s) in theses cells are probably heterotetramultimers that include TRPC6/TRPC3.

We also extended our studies to examine TRPC6 expression at the protein levels in breast cancer tissues. No specific bands were obtained when we performed Western blot analyses: (i) on lysates from LNCaP, used as negative control [36], (ii) by omitting the primary antibody and (iii) by blocking the primary antibody with the TRPC6 peptide. In contrast, both tumour, MCF-7 and hBCE lysates produced a 97 kDa band corresponding to the expected size of full length TRPC6. Moreover, no other band was observed, suggesting that TRPC6γ splice variant is not translated into protein.

A growing number of studies demonstrate a close correlation between an overexpression of TRP channels particularly of the TRPV6 and TRPM8 families and the development of cancer [13, 16]. However, little is known about the expression pattern of TRPC6 or its possible role in the development of cancer, and breast cancer in particular. To our knowledge, there is only one study which shows the involvement of the TRPC6 channels in the proliferation of epithelial human prostate cancer cells in primary culture [31]. Our results clearly show that in healthy breast tissues low levels of TRPC6 are detected in all cases determined. In contrast, the breast carcinoma tissue specimens revealed a significant overexpression of TRPC6. Moreover, TRPC6 are expressed and functional in the MCF-7 cell line and in hBCE. In vivo, the upregulation of TRPC6 was much more clearly demonstrated in cardiovascular pathologies such as hypertension, hypertrophy and increased endothelial permeability [27, 29, 30].

Few studies have compared the ionic channel expression with the tumour grade, LNM and receptor expression status. Indeed, GIRK1 was overexpressed in primary invasive breast carcinoma and correlate with LNM [37]. Pardo s group has found there were no correlations between Eag1 expression and age, grade and site of tumour of soft tissue sarcoma [38]. Similar results on Eag1 expression are found in colorectal cancer [39]. In line with these studies, we show that the TRPC6 protein levels are increased in breast tumour tissues but were not correlated either with tumour grade, ER or LNM.

Evidence indicates a crucial role for TRP channels in regulating both cell growth and cell death. Recently, it was reported that TRPV6 induced cell proliferation and took part in the resistance to apoptosis in the prostate human LNCaP cancer cells [40]. TRPC6 has been reported to be involved in primary epithelial prostate human cell proliferation induced by the α1-adrenergic receptors [31]. Breast cancer cells, including MCF-7 express G protein-coupled receptors including α1-adrenergic receptors [41]. We can thus speculate that the entry of Ca2+ through TRPC6 channel may induce breast cancer cell proliferation in response to G protein-coupled receptor signalling. More studies are needed to determine the involvement of TRPC6 in breast cell proliferation.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that TRPC6 is expressed and functional in breast cancer epithelial cells. Moreover, this channel is overexpressed in tumour tissues without any correlation with tumour grade, ER expression and lymph node metastasis.

Availability & requirements

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Financial support for the research described in this article was provided by the Région Picardie, Cancéropôle Nord-Ouest (INCa), Ligue contre le Cancer, the Ministère de l Education Nationale and ARC (Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer). We thank Jean François Lefebvre for his excellent technical assistance as well as staff at the Amiens hospital.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, JE « Canaux ioniques dans le cancer du sein », Faculté des Sciences, Université de Picardie Jules Verne
(2)
Dysrégulations Métaboliques Acquises et Génétiques, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne
(3)
Service d Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Nord
(4)
Laboratoire de Physiologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn-Zohr

References

  1. Wonderlin WF, Strobl JS: Potassium channels, proliferation and G1 progression. J Membr Biol. 1996, 154 (2): 91-107. 10.1007/s002329900135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Le Bourhis X, Roudbaraki M, Toillon RA, Delcourt P, Prevarskaya N: Changes in the K+ current-density of MCF-7 cells during progression through the cell cycle: possible involvement of a h-ether.a-gogo K+ channel. Receptors Channels. 2001, 7 (5): 345-356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Roudbaraki M, Delcourt P, Ahidouch A, Joury N, Prevarskaya N: Functional and molecular identification of intermediate-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels in breast cancer cells: association with cell cycle progression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004, 287 (1): C125-134. 10.1152/ajpcell.00488.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Potier M, Joulin V, Roger S, Besson P, Jourdan ML, Leguennec JY, Bougnoux P, Vandier C: Identification of SK3 channel as a new mediator of breast cancer cell migration. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5 (11): 2946-2953. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roger S, Besson P, Le Guennec JY: Involvement of a novel fast inward sodium current in the invasion capacity of a breast cancer cell line. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1616 (2): 107-111. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Roger S, Potier M, Vandier C, Besson P, Le Guennec JY: Voltage-gated sodium channels: new targets in cancer therapy?. Curr Pharm Des. 2006, 12 (28): 3681-3695. 10.2174/138161206778522047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser SP, Diss JK, Chioni AM, Mycielska ME, Pan H, Yamaci RF, Pani F, Siwy Z, Krasowska M, Grzywna Z, et al: Voltage-gated sodium channel expression and potentiation of human breast cancer metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (15): 5381-5389. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sergeev IN: Calcium signaling in cancer and vitamin D. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 97 (1–2): 145-151. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.06.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Strobl JS, Wonderlin WF, Flynn DC: Mitogenic signal transduction in human breast cancer cells. Gen Pharmacol. 1995, 26 (8): 1643-1649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sergeev IN, Rhoten WB: Regulation of intracellular calcium in human breast cancer cells. Endocrine. 1998, 9 (3): 321-327. 10.1385/ENDO:9:3:321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo L, Li ZS, Wang HL, Ye CY, Zhang DC: Carboxyamido-triazole inhibits proliferation of human breast cancer cells via G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006, 538 (1–3): 15-22. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.03.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhuang L, Peng JB, Tou L, Takanaga H, Adam RM, Hediger MA, Freeman MR: Calcium-selective ion channel, CaT1, is apically localized in gastrointestinal tract epithelia and is aberrantly expressed in human malignancies. Lab Invest. 2002, 82 (12): 1755-1764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bodding M, Wissenbach U, Flockerzi V: Characterisation of TRPM8 as a pharmacophore receptor. Cell Calcium. 2007, 42 (6): 618-628. 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fixemer T, Wissenbach U, Flockerzi V, Bonkhoff H: Expression of the Ca2+-selective cation channel TRPV6 in human prostate cancer: a novel prognostic marker for tumor progression. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (49): 7858-7861. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206895.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bodding M: TRP proteins and cancer. Cell Signal. 2007, 19 (3): 617-624. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prevarskaya N, Zhang L, Barritt G: TRP channels in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1772 (8): 937-946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wissenbach U, Niemeyer B, Himmerkus N, Fixemer T, Bonkhoff H, Flockerzi V: TRPV6 and prostate cancer: cancer growth beyond the prostate correlates with increased TRPV6 Ca2+ channel expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 322 (4): 1359-1363. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Peng JB, Zhuang L, Berger UV, Adam RM, Williams BJ, Brown EM, Hediger MA, Freeman MR: CaT1 expression correlates with tumor grade in prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 282 (3): 729-734. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang L, Barritt GJ: TRPM8 in prostate cancer cells: a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker with a secretory function?. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006, 13 (1): 27-38. 10.1677/erc.1.01093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wissenbach U, Niemeyer BA, Fixemer T, Schneidewind A, Trost C, Cavalie A, Reus K, Meese E, Bonkhoff H, Flockerzi V: Expression of CaT-like, a novel calcium-selective channel, correlates with the malignancy of prostate cancer. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (22): 19461-19468. 10.1074/jbc.M009895200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dietrich A, Gudermann T: TRPC6. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007, 179: 125-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Soboloff J, Spassova M, Xu W, He LP, Cuesta N, Gill DL: Role of endogenous TRPC6 channels in Ca2+ signal generation in A7r5 smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (48): 39786-39794. 10.1074/jbc.M506064200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Trebak M, Vazquez G, Bird GS, Putney JW: The TRPC3/6/7 subfamily of cation channels. Cell Calcium. 2003, 33 (5–6): 451-461. 10.1016/S0143-4160(03)00056-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Inoue R, Okada T, Onoue H, Hara Y, Shimizu S, Naitoh S, Ito Y, Mori Y: The transient receptor potential protein homologue TRP6 is the essential component of vascular alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-activated Ca(2+)-permeable cation channel. Circ Res. 2001, 88 (3): 325-332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu Y, Sweeney M, Zhang S, Platoshyn O, Landsberg J, Rothman A, Yuan JX: PDGF stimulates pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by upregulating TRPC6 expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003, 284 (2): C316-330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng LC, Gurney AM: Store-operated channels mediate Ca(2+) influx and contraction in rat pulmonary artery. Circ Res. 2001, 89 (10): 923-929. 10.1161/hh2201.100315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dietrich A, Kalwa H, Fuchs B, Grimminger F, Weissmann N, Gudermann T: In vivo TRPC functions in the cardiopulmonary vasculature. Cell Calcium. 2007, 42 (2): 233-244. 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.02.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill AJ, Hinton JM, Cheng H, Gao Z, Bates DO, Hancox JC, Langton PD, James AF: A TRPC-like non-selective cation current activated by alpha 1-adrenoceptors in rat mesenteric artery smooth muscle cells. Cell Calcium. 2006, 40 (1): 29-40. 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuwahara K, Wang Y, McAnally J, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Hill JA, Olson EN: TRPC6 fulfills a calcineurin signaling circuit during pathologic cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116 (12): 3114-3126. 10.1172/JCI27702.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Guinamard R, Bois P: Involvement of transient receptor potential proteins in cardiac hypertrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1772 (8): 885-894.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thebault S, Flourakis M, Vanoverberghe K, Vandermoere F, Roudbaraki M, Lehen'kyi V, Slomianny C, Beck B, Mariot P, Bonnal JL, et al: Differential role of transient receptor potential channels in Ca2+ entry and proliferation of prostate cancer epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (4): 2038-2047. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. El Hiani Y, Ahidouch A, Roudbaraki M, Guenin S, Brule G, Ouadid-Ahidouch H: Calcium-sensing receptor stimulation induces nonselective cation channel activation in breast cancer cells. J Membr Biol. 2006, 211 (2): 127-137. 10.1007/s00232-006-0017-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ethier SP, Mahacek M, Gullick WJ, Frank TS, Weber B: Differential isolation of normal luminal epithelial cells and breast cancer cells from primary and metastatic sites using selective media. Cancer Res. 1993, 53 (3): 627-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Parekh AB, Putney JW: Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol Rev. 2005, 85 (2): 757-810. 10.1152/physrev.00057.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dietrich A, Kalwa H, Rost BR, Gudermann T: The Diacylglycerol-sensitive TRPC3/6/7 subfamily of cation channels: functionnal characterization and physiological revelance. Plugers Arch. 2005, 451 (1): 72-80. 10.1007/s00424-005-1460-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Thebault S, Roudbaraki M, Sydorenko V, Shuba Y, Lemonnier L, Slomianny C, Dewailly E, Bonnal JL, Mauroy B, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N: Alpha1-adrenergic receptors activate Ca(2+)-permeable cationic channels in prostate cancer epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 2003, 111 (11): 1691-1701. 10.1172/JCI16293.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Stringer BK, Cooper AG, Shepard SB: Overexpression of the G-protein inwardly rectifying potassium channel 1 (GIRK1) in primary breast carcinomas correlates with axillary lymph node metastasis. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (2): 582-588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mello de Queiroz F, Suarez-Kurtz G, Stühmer W, Pardo LA: Ether à go-go potassium channel expression in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Mol Cancer. 2006, 5: 42-10.1186/1476-4598-5-42. 2006 oct 5View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Ding EL, Metha S, Fawszi WW, Giovannucci EL: Interaction of estrogen therapy wtih calcium and vitaminD supplementation on colorectal cancer risk: Reanalysis of Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. Int J Cancer. 2007, 122 (8): 1690-1694. 10.1002/ijc.23311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehen'kyi V, Flourakis M, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N: TRPV6 channel controls prostate cancer cell proliferation via Ca(2+)/NFAT-dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (52): 7380-7385. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vazquez SM, Mladovan AG, Perez C, Bruzzone A, Baldi A, Luthy IA: Human breast cell lines exhibit functional alpha2-adrenoceptors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006, 58 (1): 50-61. 10.1007/s00280-005-0130-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/125/prepub

Copyright

© Guilbert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.