Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

LEIGClong non-coding RNA acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric carcinoma by inhibiting the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

  • Yuehua Han1,
  • Jun Ye1,
  • Dang Wu2,
  • Pin Wu2,
  • Zhigang Chen2,
  • Jian Chen3,
  • Shunliang Gao3 and
  • Jian Huang2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201414:932

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-932

Received: 11 June 2014

Accepted: 25 November 2014

Published: 11 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Long non-coding RNAs have been shown to have critical regulatory roles in cancer biology. However, the contributions of lncRNAs to gastric cancer remain largely unknown.

Methods

The differential expression of lncRNAs in gastric cancer and paired non-cancerous tissues were identified by microarray and validated using quantitative real-time PCR. Gastric samples from patients with gastric cancer were further analyzed for levels of a specifically downregulated lncRNA (termed as LEIGC).

Results

We found that there were significantly lower levels of LEIGC expression in cancer tissue than in adjacent non-cancerous tissues in human gastric cancers (P < 0.01). Overexpression of LEIGC suppressed tumor growth and cell proliferation, and enhanced the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), whereas knockdown of LEIGC showed the opposite effect. We further demonstrated LEIGC functions by inhibiting the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in gastric cancer.

Conclusions

Our data suggested that LEIGC is a tumor-suppressing lncRNA in gastric cancer, and led us to propose that lncRNAs may play important regulatory roles in cancer development and progression.

Keywords

Long non-coding RNA Tumor suppressor Gastric carcinoma Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

Background

Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death, with a high mortality worldwide, especially in Asia [1, 2]. Unfortunately, gastric cancer is difficult to cure unless it is identified at an early stage, before it has begun to spread. The 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients remains poor, at approximately 40%, despite recent advances in surgical techniques and medical treatment [3, 4]. Metastasis is the main cause of death from such tumors. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify new molecular markers for early diagnosis, prediction of metastatic progression and prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

The human transcriptome comprises not only large numbers of protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs), but also many non-protein coding transcripts that function as important regulatory molecules in tumor suppressor or oncogenic pathways [5]. Non-coding RNAs are divided into short non-coding RNAs and long non-coding RNAs depending on their length. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are defined as non-coding RNAs of more than 200 nucleotides in length, and are characterized by the complexity and diversity of their sequences and mechanisms of action [6]. Recent deep transcriptome sequencing and microarray studies have revealed that 70–90% of the human genome is estimated to be transcribed into mostly non-protein-coding RNA [7]. Increasing evidence indicates that lncRNAs exert important roles in a wide range of biological processes, including cell differentiation, chromatin remodeling, immune responses and tumorigenesis [68]. LncRNA levels are strongly associated with aberrant gene expression that may drive cancer development and progression [9], such as HOTAIR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [10], PRNCR1 (also known as PCAT8) and PCGEM1 in prostate cancer [11], and MEG3 in cervical cancer and meningiomas [12, 13]. Thus, differential expression of lncRNAs may be profiled to aid cancer diagnosis, prognosis and selection of potential therapeutics.

Although lncRNAs play important roles in human diseases, the mechanism through which they contribute to cancer development is still largely unknown. LncRNAs can regulate critical cancer pathways at a transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic level [14]. Mounting evidence suggests that a major role of lncRNAs is to act as modular scaffolds for protein-chromatin interactions [15]. Several lncRNAs can control gene expression by direct recruitment of histone-modifying enzymes to chromatin [6, 15]. Chromatin modification and DNA methylation are crucial epigenetic events that are fundamentally disturbed during the development of cancer. LncRNAs can also affect protein-coding transcript response to different biological processes [16].

However, there are only preliminary studies on the role of lncRNAs in gastric cancer [1719], and the overall pathophysiological contributions of lncRNAs to gastric cancer remain largely unknown. A current estimate of the lncRNA gene number in the human genome ranges from 8000–20,000 unique lncRNAs [20, 21], suggesting lncRNAs constitute a large yet undiscovered part of normal cellular networks that may be disrupted in cancer. Therefore, it is of great importance to explore the molecular mechanisms of lncRNAs in gastric cancer development and progression. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression pattern and clinicopathological implications of lncRNAs in gastric cancer tissues. We identified a new specific differentially-expressed lncRNA (termed LEIGC), which was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Then we performed gain- and loss-of-function studies to determine the effect of LEIGC on tumor growth, cell proliferation, and migration, and showed that LEIGC suppressed tumor growth, cell proliferation and EMT in gastric cancer, and increased the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU.

Methods

Cell lines

Human gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803, AGS, SGC-7901 were purchased from the cell bank of China Academy of Medical Science (China). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.

LncRNA expression microarray analysis

Total RNA of gastric cancer tissues and paired normal tissues were extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of RNA was evaluated using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Worcester, MA, USA). The lncRNA expression profile of each sample was examined using a lncRNA expression microarray (SurePrint Human Gene Expression Microarray Kit, Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The BROAD Institute database was used in the genesis of the array. After hybridization and washing, the processed slides were scanned with the Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent technologies Santa Clara, CA, USA). Raw data were extracted as pair files using Feature Extraction software 10.7 (Agilent technologies). A fold change of ≥ 2.0 or <0.5 (P ≤ 0.05) was set as a threshold for up- and downregulated genes, respectively, and data were presented as mean ± SD. Raw data were normalized by a Quantile algorithm using Gene Spring Software 11.0 (Agilent technologies). Hierarchical clustering was performed based on differentially-expressed lncRNAs using Cluster Treeview software from Stanford University.

Structural analysis of LEIGC

We used the BLAT program of the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Genome Browser, BLAST, and MAP VIEW of the NCBI to analyze the gene sequence and chromosomal location of LEIGC.

Quantitative real time PCR analysis

Total RNA from cell lines and tissues was purified by the Trizol (Invitrogen) method according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were evaluated using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and the expression of LEIGC, snail, zeb, slug, CDH1, and twist was measured using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the Stepone plus system (Applied Biosystems). Each sample was run in triplicate and the gene expression levels were normalized to GAPDH expression. The primers for quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis were listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Primer sequences used in qRT-PCR

Gene name

Primers

LEIGC

F: 5’- agg ata cgt aag aaa cac ttc tgt -3’

 

R: 5’- tgt ctt ggt tta aca acc ga -3’

snail

F: 5’- acc cca cat cct tct cac tg −3

 

R: 5’- tac aaa aac cca cgc aga ca −3

slug

F:5’- aca cac aca cac cca cag ag −3

 

R:5’- aaa tga ttt ggc agc aat gt −3

zeb

F: 5’- gca caa cca agt gca gaa ga -3’

 

R: 5’- cat ttg cag att gag gct ga -3’

E-cadherin

F: 5’- tgc tct tgc tgt ttc ttc gg-3’

 

R: 5’- tgc ccc att cgt tca agt ag-3’

N-cadherin

F: 5’- tgg atg gac ctt atg ttg ct -3’

 

R: 5’- aac acc tgt ctt ggg atc aa -3’

twist

F: 5’-gga gtc cgc agt ctt acg ag-3’

 

R: 5’-cca gct tga ggg tct gaa tc-3’

GAPDH

F: 5’-ctt agc acc cct ggc caa g-3’

 

R:5’-gat gtt ctg gag agc ccc g-3’

Cycling conditions were 10 min at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C for denaturation, 30 sec at 60°C for combined annealing and 30 sec at 72°C for primer extension. Each sample was run in triplicate and the gene expression levels were normalized to that of GAPDH expression.

Establishment of lncRNA or lncRNA-shRNA stable cells

LEIGC vector (LV6-Puro) or LEIGC-shRNA vector (pGLV2-U6-Puro) (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and scrambled shRNA or non-related lncRNA vector lentiviral particles (GenePharma Tech, Shanghai, China) were transfected into MGC-803 cells. Cells were selected with 5 μg/ml puromycin (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) at 48 h after transfection. The overexpression and knockdown efficiencies were verified by qRT-PCR.

In vitromotility assay

Transwell insert chambers with 8-μm porous membranes (Corning Incorporated, NY, USA) were used for motility assays. Cells were washed three times with PBS and 5 × 104 cells in serum-free media were added to the top chamber. The bottom chamber was filled with RPMI 1640 medium containing 15% FBS. Cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. To quantify migrating cells, cells in the top chamber were removed using a cotton-tipped swab, and the migrated cells were fixed in methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet.

Cell growth assay

Cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 103 cells/well in a 96-well plate containing 0.2 ml RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS. Then 20 μl MTS (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl] -5-[3-carboxmethoxy phenyl]-2-[4-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium salt) (Promega) reagent was added to each well and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The OD values were measured at 490 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and assessed daily for 7 days.

Colony formation assay

The proliferative ability of cells was tested in colony formation assays. Approximately 300 cells were seeded into each well of a 12-well plate. After incubation at 37°C for 14 days, the cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with methanol and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of colonies containing more than 300 cells was counted under a microscope.

Tumorigenesis assay

A total of 1 × 106 cells suspended in 100 μl RPMI 1640 were implanted into the hindquarters of 4-week-old female NOD/SCID mice to assess their ability to initiate tumor xenografts. The use and care of experimental animal was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. Tumors were measured weekly and their volume calculated as length × width × width/2 [22].

Western blotting

Total protein from cells was lysed using M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Samples were denatured, and equal amounts of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 60 min, membranes were incubated with primary antibody dissolved in 5% bovine serum albumin in TBST overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-human- E-cadherin (1:2000, 24E10; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-human-Vimentin (1:2000, D21H3; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-human-Snail (1:1000, C15D3; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-human-Twist (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-human-Zeb (1:1000, D80D3; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-human-Slug (1:1000, C19G7; Cell Signaling). Human GAPDH (1:5000; KangChen, Shanghai, China) was used as an internal reference.

Cell viability assay

MGC-803 cells were transfected with LEIGC vector or LEIGC shRNA vector and scrambled shRNA or non-related lncRNA vector, and incubated for 24 h. Then cells were reseeded in 96-well plates and treated with 5-FU (NanTong Pharmaceutical Factory, China) at different concentrations for 48 h. The cell viability was determined by the MTT assay: 20 μl of MTT (Sigma) per well was added and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The reaction was stopped by adding 200 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to each well followed by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA) for the indicated time periods at 37°C to determine the individual IC50 values (50% cell growth inhibitory concentrations).

Clinical gastric cancer sample analysis

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Medical University, China. Human gastric cancer and paired normal tissues were obtained in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee. All gastric cancer patients gave written informed consent for the use of clinical specimens in medical research. Specimens were collected between 2007 and 2009 at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The diagnosis of each case was confirmed independently by two pathologists. Tumors were staged using the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) staging system (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinicopathological features of gastric cancer patients

Parameters

Cases (n = 35)

Gender

 

  Male

26

  Female

9

Age (years)

 

  Male

63 (42–87)

  Female

58 (31–71)

Histological grade

 

  Well differentiated

4

  Moderate differentiated

24

  Poor differentiated

7

Lymph node metastasis

 

  N0

10

  N1,2,3

25

Distant metastasis

 

  M0 (NM group)

18

  M1 (M group)

17

TNM stage

 

  I

7

  II

4

  III

19

  IV

5

TNM stage tumor-node-metastasis stage.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 software. The qRT-PCR results from paired clinical samples were analyzed by a two-tail paired Student’s t-test and the other results by a two-tail unpaired Student’s t-test. P values of <0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Expression of LEIGCin gastric cancer tissues

To identify genes involved in gastric cancer progression, lncRNA array analysis was performed on total RNA isolated from three gastric cancer samples, and matched peri-cancerous samples. Microarray analysis detected different upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs (Figure 1A). To select lncRNA for further studies, we applied more stringent filtering criteria: (1) high-expression levels; and (2) similar expression patterns in different clinical samples. Results demonstrated there were four significantly downregulated lncRNAs (lncRNA: chr2:118381039–118383698, lncRNA:chr9:21879775–21938825, lncRNA:chr21:36744804–36953062, lncRNA: chr14:96089622–96112397) and seven significantly upregulated lncRNA (lncRNA:chr1:89873237–89890493, lncRNA:chr15:49013058–49023258, lncRNA: chr2:216462380–216469880, lncRNA:chr7:22603825–22730864, lncRNA:chr13: 29222100–29228575, lncRNA:chr5:12574968–12804473, lncRNA:chr8: 37330594– 37411701) in gastric cancer tissues versus paired normal tissues (P < 0.05; Figure 1A).The expression levels of selected lncRNAs (P < 0.05; Figure 1B, C) and mRNA (P < 0.05; Figure 1D) were also validated by qRT-PCR analyses on the same three human gastric cancer tissue samples and paired non-cancerous tissues. We further examined lncRNA: chr2:118381039–118383698 expression levels in 35 paired gastric cancer samples and adjacent normal tissues by qRT-PCR. We observed that lncRNA: chr2:118381039–118383698 levels were significantly downregulated in gastric cancer tissue samples compared with normal tissue samples (P < 0.01; Figure 1E); this was named as LEIGC. These data indicated that LEIGC may be a probable new target to prevent relapse and metastasis of gastric cancer.
Figure 1

Alterations in lncRNA expression profiles between gastric tumor tissues and paired adjacent non-tumorous tissues. (A). lncRNA expression was evaluated by an lncRNA expression microarray. Results from hierarchical clustering showed different lncRNA expression among samples. “Red” indicates high expression; “green” indicates low expression. (B). Results from qRT-PCR experiments demonstrating downregulated expression of lncRNAs in three gastric cancer samples. (C). qRT-PCR analysis of lncRNAs selected from microarray results in three gastric cancer samples revealed upregulated expression. (D). qRT-PCR verification of mRNA selected from microarray results in three gastric cancer samples. (E). Expression of lncRNA LEIGC in fresh gastric cancer tissues from 35 patients was detected by qRT-PCR. LEIGC levels were normalized to GAPDH and expressed in terms of the threshold cycle (CT) ratio. Error bars represent the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Structural analysis of LEIGC

We named this lncRNA gene as LEIGC (lower expression in gastric cancer) according to the human gene nomenclature guideline by the Human Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) [23]. We found no repetitive naming compared with other genes in Genbank and EMBO datasets by BLAST. Gene sequence analysis by BLAT, BLAST and MAP VIEW of NCBI revealed that LEIGC was present in a novel amplicon on chromosome 2 and located at 2q14.1 (Figure 2). LEIGC consists of 2659 bp with two exons (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Partial gene sequence and molecular structure map of LEIGC. Gene sequence was analyzed by BLAT, BLAST and MAP VIEW programs. Map of LEIGC molecular structure was revealed by the BLAT program; 1 and 2 indicate different exons.

LEIGC suppresses tumor growth in vitro

To examine the effect of LEIGC overexpression and knockdown in gastric cell proliferation, we performed MTS and colony formation assays. MGC-803 cells are a gastric cancer cell line with moderate LEIGC expression level, as confirmed by qRT-PCR in our study (Figure 3A). We stably transfected LEIGC vector (LV6-Puro), LEIGC-shRNA vector (pGLV2-U6-Puro) and their control vector lentiviral particles into MGC-803 cells. The efficiency of overexpression and knockdown was verified by qRT-PCR (Figure 3B). Overexpression of LEIGC in MGC-803 cells markedly reduced the number of cell colonies formed (Figure 3E). When compared with cells transfected with non-related lncRNA vector, overexpression of LEIGC significantly decreased the cell proliferation rate, as measured by MTS (P < 0.05; Figure 3C). In contrast, LEIGC knockdown in MGC-803 cells showed the opposite results (P < 0.05; Figure 3C). These data supported the tumor suppressive function of LEIGC in gastric cancer cells.
Figure 3

Growth and colony formation assays of MGC-803 cells following overexpression or knockdown of LEIGC. Cells were transfected with LEIGC-shRNA vector (shRNA) and scrambled shRNA vector (NC1), or LEIGC vector (lncRNA) and non-related lncRNA vector (NC2), and blank control (blank). (A). Basal levels of LEIGC in MGC-803, SGC-7901 and AGS cells. (B). Knockdown and overexpression of LEIGC was confirmed by qRT-PCR. (C). Cell proliferation rate was determined by measuring the absorbance at 490 nm in MTS assays. (D and E). Colony formation assays of MGC 803 cells. *P>0.05.

LEIGC inhibits migration of gastric cancer cells in vitro

The important process of carcinoma progression is that dissociated epithelial cells acquire migration and invasive abilities and can pass through the basement membrane to distant tissues. To determine whether LEIGC regulates the migratory ability of gastric cancer cells, we performed migration assays. We used MGC-803 cells as a model because of their strong motility. Pooled LEIGC-overexpressing cells showed a significantly lower migration potential than LEIGC knockdown cells and controls in the migration assay (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Effect of LEIGC knockdown and overexpression on cell migration. (A). MGC-803 cells that had migrated to the bottom chamber after transfection with blank vector (blank); (B and C). MGC-803 cells that had migrated to the bottom chamber after transfection with shRNA vector (shRNA) and scrambled shRNA vector (NC1); (D and E). MGC-803 cells that had migrated to the bottom chamber after transfection with LEIGC vector (lncRNA) and non-related lncRNA vector (NC2); (F). Quantification of different MGC-803 cells that had migrated to the top chamber *P<0.05.

LEIGC knockdown promotes tumor progression in vivo

We examined the progression potential of LEIGC knockdown in MGC-803 cells using a NOD/SCID mouse model. MGC-803 cells transfected with LEIGC-shRNA or scrambled vectors were subcutaneously injected into NOD/SCID mice (n = 4). Tumor growth was monitored by standard caliper measurement in a blinded fashion. Tumors formed in sites injected with MGC-803 cells (Figure 5). After 4 weeks, animals were sacrificed for determination of tumor weights. Histopathological examination demonstrated that MGC-803 cells with or without LEIGC knockdown generated uniform implanted tumors. As shown in Figure 5B, tumor development was first visible at 14 days after injection. Tumors of MGC-803 cells transfected with scrambled vector grew significantly slower in comparison with tumors of MGC-803 cells transfected with LEIGC-shRNA vector (P < 0.05; Figure 5B). In addition, MGC-803 cells transfected with LEIGC-shRNA vectors generated tumors that were significantly larger than those derived from control cells at the time of resection (P < 0.05; Figure 5A). Thus, LEIGC knockdown in MGC-803 cells was tumorigenic and resulted in the formation of aggressive tumors that were well palpable.
Figure 5

LEIGC knockdown enhanced the tumorigenic potential of gastric carcinoma cells in vivo. (A). Exposure of tumors inoculated with LEIGC-shRNA vector cells (shRNA) and scrambled shRNA vector (NC1) when mice were sacrificed. (A). Representative image of xenograft tumors in NOD/SCID mice subcutaneously injected with MGC-803 cells; 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the different mice. (B). Comparison of xenograft formation in vivo. Tumor volumes were measured each week. Error bars represent means ± SEM, *P < 0.05.

LEIGCenhances chemosensitivity to 5-FU in gastric cancer

To determine the effect of LEIGC on the sensitivity to 5-FU chemotherapeutic agent, cell viability was measured using the MTT assay. Transfection of MGC-803 cells with LEIGC vector resulted in significantly decreased cell viability with treatment of 5-FU at 2 and 5 μg/μl (P < 0.05; Figure 6A) compared with control cells, whereas there was no obvious change in cell viability at 10 μg/μl. Transfection of MGC-803 cells with LEIGC-shRNA vector resulted in significantly increased cell viability in each of the 5-FU treatments (2, 5,10 μg/μl) (P < 0.05; Figure 6A). Next we measured the IC50 values for 5-FU following LEIGC knockdown in gastric cancer cells (MGC-803, SGC-7901 and AGS) and control cells. The result showed LEIGC knockdown cells had the lowest sensitivity to 5-FU (P < 0.05; Figure 6B).
Figure 6

Effect of LEIGC on gastric cancer cell chemosensitivity to 5-FU. (A). MGC-803 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with different concentrations of 5-FU for 48 h. Cell viability was measured using MTT assays. (B). IC50 of gastric cancer cells (SGC 7901, MGC-803 and AGC) transfected with LEIGC-shRNA vector (shRNA) and scrambled shRNA vector (NC1), *P < 0.05.

LEIGCis a novel factor that prevents EMT in gastric cancer

To determine whether LEIGC contributes to tumor metastasis, we performed morphological observations of MGC-803 cells following LEIGC overexpression and knockdown. Intriguingly, LEIGC knockdown cells appeared spindle-shaped and fibroblastic in monolayer cultures, and displayed a clear transition from cobblestone-like cells to spindle-like fibroblastic morphology, whereas LEIGC-overexpressing cells maintained their cobblestone-like phenotype (Figure 7). This morphological change implied that the LEIGC knockdown cells had undergone trans-differentiation from epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells.
Figure 7

LEIGC inhibited EMT in MGC-803 cells. (A). MGC-803 cells transfected with blank control vector (blank); (B and C). Cells transfected with LEIGC-shRNA vector (shRNA) and scrambled shRNA vector (NC1); (D and E). Cells transfected with LEIGC vector (lncRNA) and non-related lncRNA vector (NC2). (F). Effects of LEIGC on the expression of EMT-related genes CDH1, twist, snail, slug, and zeb at the mRNA level were analyzed by qRT- PCR. *P<0.05. (G). Effects of LEIGC on the expression of EMT-related proteins. After transfection of the cells with different vectors, E-cadherin, Vimentin, Twist, Slug, and Zeb expression levels were determined by western blotting. GAPDH protein levels served as an internal control.

To confirm that LEIGC knockdown in MGC-803 cells resulted in a mesenchymal phenotype, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of LEIGC-overexpressing cells versus knockdown MGC-803 cells. As shown in Figure 7, the epithelial cell-related gene CDH1 was significantly downregulated, whereas several mesenchymal cell markers (such as snail, slug, zeb, and twist) were significantly upregulated in LEIGC knockdown cells compared with LEIGC-overexpressing cells (Figure 7F). We further examined EMT-associated protein expression in MGC-803 cells by western blotting. As shown in Figure 7G, LEIGC knockdown cells demonstrated lower expression of E-cadherin and higher expression of Vimentin, Snail, Slug, Zeb, and Twist. Overexpression of LEIGC showed the opposite effect. These data indicated that LEIGC was a potent EMT inhibitor in gastric cancer cells.

Discussion

Over the past few years, hundreds of lncRNAs have been shown to play important roles in both transcription and post-transcriptional processes. Studies have reported that lncRNA dysfunctions are associated with a broad range of human tumors, including those of metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), HOX antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR), antisense non-coding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL), and lncRNA-p21 [10, 24]. lncRNAs are aberrantly expressed in many types of cancers [25, 26]. However, the potential roles of lncRNAs in human cancers are not well understood. In this study, we verified that LEIGC was significantly downregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with paired non-cancerous tissues. Furthermore, our results indicated that LEIGC inhibited tumor growth, proliferation, migration, and EMT in gastric cancer cells. Hence, our results also suggest that LEIGC is a putative tumor/metastasis suppressor in gastric cancer.

Recently, many studies have shown that lncRNAs have important roles in the regulation of numerous biological processes in cancer, including tumor proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and EMT. Altered expression of lncRNAs has been documented in different human cancer types, prompting increased interest in their use as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis as well as potential therapeutic targets [7]. For example, a study demonstrated that HULC was significantly overexpressed in gastric cancer cell lines and gastric cancer tissues compared with normal tissues, and its overexpression was correlated with distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis [17]. Knockdown of HULC inhibited proliferation, invasion and EMT, and promoted cell apoptosis in SGC-7901 gastric cancer cells. Recently, increased levels of HOTAIR in primary breast tumors were shown to correlate with breast cancer invasiveness and metastasis [25]. HOTAIR bridges together the PRC2 complex with the LSD1 H3K4 demethylase complex, and recruits both complexes to target genes to coordinately alter several histone modifications and enforce gene silencing. The increased expression of HOTAIR in human gastric cancers was associated with venous invasion, lymph node metastases and a lower overall survival rate [9, 15].

To explore the exact mechanisms of LEIGC in gastric cancer, we used gene transfection experiments to overexpress and silence LEIGC in MGC-803 gastric cancer cells. The key event for malignant tumor progression is metastasis, which is based on tumor cell migration and invasion. Metastasis accounts for the majority of gastric cancer-related mortality, but the mechanism of the metastatic process in gastric cancer is very complex, and still not completely understood. EMT was originally recognized as a critical step to metazoan embryogenesis and in defining structures during organ development [27]. During the last decade, a number of studies have associated EMT with cancer progression and metastasis in gastric cancer. In our transwell assay, knockdown of LEIGC dramatically promoted cell migration in gastric cancer cells (Figure 4). We found LEIGC silencing was associated with features typical of EMT, including the conversion of the cobblestone-like epithelial morphology to spindle-shape mesenchymal morphology, reduced expression of CDH1, and increased expression of snail, slug, twist and zeb. Consistent with the observed morphological changes, some hallmark proteins of epithelial cells were lost or reduced during the transition, such as E-cadherin. In contrast, the mesenchymal protein vimentin was upregulated. It is well known that E-cadherin plays a critical role in the suppression of tumor invasion. Most epithelial cancers display downregulated or inactivated E-cadherin [28, 29]. It has been shown that the restoration of functional E-cadherin suppresses invasion in many tumor types. Snail, Twist, Slug and Zeb associated with EMT have all been shown to target E-boxes on the E-cadherin promoter, repressing its expression [30, 31]. We observed that snail, slug, twist and zeb genes and corresponding proteins were highly elevated in LEIGC knockdown cells (Figure 7). However, overexpression of LEIGC resulted in the opposite effect in MGC-803 cells. Taken together, these data indicated that LEIGC is a critical regulator in preventing EMT in gastric cancer. However, in our study, no significant correlation was found between LEIGC expression and distant tumor metastasis or lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer (data not shown). This might be because of the low number of gastric patients in our study.

Conclusions

In summary, our data provides evidence that may mechanistically link the expression of LEIGC to the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells. We demonstrate that LEIGC functions as a tumor suppressor lncRNA in gastric cancer by inhibiting EMT, and propose that lncRNAs may play important regulatory roles in cancer development and progression. Further analysis and investigation of the mechanisms of LEIGC in the molecular etiology of gastric cancer will provide lncRNA-directed diagnostic and therapeutic tools against this deadly disease.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ12H16009), the Science and Technology Bureau of Zhejiang Province (No. 2013C33137), and Science and Technology Project of the health department of Zhejiang Province (No. 2008A092). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
(2)
Cancer Institute, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
(3)
Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
(4)
Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

References

  1. de Martel C, Forman D, Plummer M: Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013, 42 (2): 219-240. 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.01.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010, 127 (12): 2893-2917. 10.1002/ijc.25516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu J, Huang CM, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX: Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Surg Oncol. 2013, 22 (3): 167-171. 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dassen AE, Dikken JL, van de Velde CJ, Wouters MW, Bosscha K, Lemmens VE: Changes in treatment patterns and their influence on long-term survival in patients with stages I-III gastric cancer in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer. 2013, 133 (8): 1859-1866. 10.1002/ijc.28192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, Tanzer A, Lagarde J, Lin W, Schlesinger F, Xue C, Marinov GK, Khatun J, Williams BA, Zaleski C, Rozowsky J, Roder M, Kokocinski F, Abdelhamid RF, Alioto T, Antoshechkin I, Baer MT, Bar NS, Batut P, Bell K, Bell I, Chakrabortty S, Chen X, Chrast J, Curado J, et al: Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012, 489 (7414): 101-108. 10.1038/nature11233.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W: Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009, 136 (4): 629-641. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibb EA, Brown CJ, Lam WL: The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol Cancer. 2011, 10: 38-10.1186/1476-4598-10-38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Khalil AM, Guttman M, Huarte M, Garber M, Raj A, Rivea Morales D, Thomas K, Presser A, Bernstein BE, van Oudenaarden A, Regev A, Lander ES, Rinn JL: Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106 (28): 11667-11672. 10.1073/pnas.0904715106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Endo H, Shiroki T, Nakagawa T, Yokoyama M, Tamai K, Yamanami H, Fujiya T, Sato I, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka N, Iijima K, Shimosegawa T, Sugamura K, Satoh K: Enhanced expression of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR is associated with the development of gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (10): e77070-10.1371/journal.pone.0077070.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakagawa T, Endo H, Yokoyama M, Abe J, Tamai K, Tanaka N, Sato I, Takahashi S, Kondo T, Satoh K: Large noncoding RNA HOTAIR enhances aggressive biological behavior and is associated with short disease-free survival in human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013, 436 (2): 319-324. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang L, Lin C, Jin C, Yang JC, Tanasa B, Li W, Merkurjev D, Ohgi KA, Meng D, Zhang J, Evans CP, Rosenfeld MG: lncRNA-dependent mechanisms of androgen-receptor-regulated gene activation programs. Nature. 2013, 500 (7464): 598-602. 10.1038/nature12451.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Qin R, Chen Z, Ding Y, Hao J, Hu J, Guo F: Long non-coding RNA MEG3 inhibits the proliferation of cervical carcinoma cells through the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Neoplasma. 2013, 60 (5): 486-492. 10.4149/neo_2013_063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Balik V, Srovnal J, Sulla I, Kalita O, Foltanova T, Vaverka M, Hrabalek L, Hajduch M: MEG3: a novel long noncoding potentially tumour-suppressing RNA in meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2013, 112 (1): 1-8. 10.1007/s11060-012-1038-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huarte M, Rinn JL: Large non-coding RNAs: missing links in cancer?. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19 (R2): R152-R161. 10.1093/hmg/ddq353.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsai MC, Manor O, Wan Y, Mosammaparast N, Wang JK, Lan F, Shi Y, Segal E, Chang HY: Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science. 2010, 329 (5992): 689-693. 10.1126/science.1192002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Huarte M, Guttman M, Feldser D, Garber M, Koziol MJ, Kenzelmann-Broz D, Khalil AM, Zuk O, Amit I, Rabani M, Attardi LD, Regev A, Lander ES, Jacks T, Rinn JL: A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell. 2010, 142 (3): 409-419. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.040.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao Y, Guo Q, Chen J, Hu J, Wang S, Sun Y: Role of long non-coding RNA HULC in cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor metastasis of gastric cancer: a clinical and in vitro investigation. Oncol Rep. 2014, 31 (1): 358-364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Arita T, Ichikawa D, Konishi H, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Shoda K, Kawaguchi T, Hirajima S, Nagata H, Kubota T, Fujiwara H, Okamoto K, Otsuji E: Circulating long non-coding RNAs in plasma of patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33 (8): 3185-3193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang F, Bi J, Xue X, Zheng L, Zhi K, Hua J, Fang G: Up-regulated long non-coding RNA H19 contributes to proliferation of gastric cancer cells. FEBS J. 2012, 279 (17): 3159-3165. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08694.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhartiya D, Pal K, Ghosh S, Kapoor S, Jalali S, Panwar B, Jain S, Sati S, Sengupta S, Sachidanandan C, Raghava GP, Sivasubbu S, Scaria V: lncRNome: a comprehensive knowledgebase of human long noncoding RNAs. Database (Oxford). 2013, 2013: bat034-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipovich L, Johnson R, Lin CY: MacroRNA underdogs in a microRNA world: evolutionary, regulatory, and biomedical significance of mammalian long non-protein-coding RNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010, 1799 (9): 597-615. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ye J, Wu X, Wu D, Wu P, Ni C, Zhang Z, Chen Z, Qiu F, Xu J, Huang J: miRNA-27b targets vascular endothelial growth factor C to inhibit tumor progression and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (4): e60687-10.1371/journal.pone.0060687.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Eyre TA, Ducluzeau F, Sneddon TP, Povey S, Bruford EA, Lush MJ: The HUGO gene nomenclature database, 2006 updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D319-D321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen G, Wang Z, Wang D, Qiu C, Liu M, Chen X, Zhang Q, Yan G, Cui Q: LncRNA disease: a database for long-non-coding RNA-associated diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41 (Database issue): D983-D986.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, Wang Y, Brzoska P, Kong B, Li R, West RB, van de Vijver MJ, Sukumar S, Chang HY: Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010, 464 (7291): 1071-1076. 10.1038/nature08975.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotake Y, Nakagawa T, Kitagawa K, Suzuki S, Liu N, Kitagawa M, Xiong Y: Long non-coding RNA ANRIL is required for the PRC2 recruitment to and silencing of p15(INK4B) tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 2011, 30 (16): 1956-1962. 10.1038/onc.2010.568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenburg G, Hay ED: Epithelia suspended in collagen gels can lose polarity and express characteristics of migrating mesenchymal cells. J Cell Biol. 1982, 95 (1): 333-339. 10.1083/jcb.95.1.333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shimada S, Mimata A, Sekine M, Mogushi K, Akiyama Y, Fukamachi H, Jonkers J, Tanaka H, Eishi Y, Yuasa Y: Synergistic tumour suppressor activity of E-cadherin and p53 in a conditional mouse model for metastatic diffuse-type gastric cancer. Gut. 2012, 61 (3): 344-353. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawauchi T: Cell adhesion and its endocytic regulation in cell migration during neural development and cancer metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2012, 13 (4): 4564-4590.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Otsuki S, Inokuchi M, Enjoji M, Ishikawa T, Takagi Y, Kato K, Yamada H, Kojima K, Sugihara K: Vimentin expression is associated with decreased survival in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2011, 25 (5): 1235-1242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosivatz E, Becker I, Specht K, Fricke E, Luber B, Busch R, Hofler H, Becker KF: Differential expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators snail, SIP1, and twist in gastric cancer. Am J Pathol. 2002, 161 (5): 1881-1891. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64464-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/932/prepub

Copyright

© Han et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.