Skip to main content

Modulation of Ras signaling alters the toxicity of hydroquinone, a benzene metabolite and component of cigarette smoke



Benzene is an established human leukemogen, with a ubiquitous environmental presence leading to significant population exposure. In a genome-wide functional screen in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, inactivation of IRA2, a yeast ortholog of the human tumor suppressor gene NF1 (Neurofibromin), enhanced sensitivity to hydroquinone, an important benzene metabolite. Increased Ras signaling is implicated as a causal factor in the increased pre-disposition to leukemia of individuals with mutations in NF1.


Growth inhibition of yeast by hydroquinone was assessed in mutant strains exhibiting varying levels of Ras activity. Subsequently, effects of hydroquinone on both genotoxicity (measured by micronucleus formation) and proliferation of WT and Nf1 null murine hematopoietic precursors were assessed.


Here we show that the Ras status of both yeast and mammalian cells modulates hydroquinone toxicity, indicating potential synergy between Ras signaling and benzene toxicity. Specifically, enhanced Ras signaling increases both hydroquinone-mediated growth inhibition in yeast and genotoxicity in mammalian hematopoetic precursors as measured by an in vitro erythroid micronucleus assay. Hydroquinone also increases proliferation of CFU-GM progenitor cells in mice with Nf1 null bone marrow relative to WT, the same cell type associated with benzene-associated leukemia.


Together our findings show that hydroquinone toxicity is modulated by Ras signaling. Individuals with abnormal Ras signaling could be more vulnerable to developing myeloid diseases after exposure to benzene. We note that hydroquinone is used cosmetically as a skin-bleaching agent, including by individuals with cafe-au-lait spots (which may be present in individuals with neurofibromatosis who have a mutation in NF1), which could be unadvisable given our findings.

Peer Review reports


Benzene is ubiquitous in the environment due to its wide use in industry for the production of plastics, resins, dyes and detergents, and its presence in gasoline. Hydroquinone (HQ) is a primary oxidative metabolite of benzene. Globally, there is extensive population and occupational exposure to HQ [1]. Both benzene and HQ are also found in cigarette smoke and HQ is the most abundant pro-oxidant compound in cigarette smoke tar [2], though HQ is also found in the plasma of nonsmoker individuals living a Western lifestyle [3]. In addition to industrial exposure, there is significant dietary exposure to HQ in the form of arbutin, a HQ glucose conjugate [3]. Also, in some individuals dermal exposure can be significant as HQ is used as a skin-bleaching agent, to treat conditions such as hypermelanosis, vitiligo, and cafe-au-lait spots.

Benzene causes leukemia in humans (reviewed in [1]) and HQ itself causes DNA damage in vitro. HQ is capable of binding to both DNA and protein, and can induce oxidative stress and inhibit apoptosis [46]. HQ is formed through a multi-step process involving the action of Cytochrome P450s on benzene in the liver and perhaps other organs. HQ can travel to the bone marrow and is oxidized through both autoxidation and by myeloperoxidase (MPO) to highly toxic quinones [7], thus contributing significantly to benzene toxicity.

Ras proteins transduce cellular signals required for the control of cell growth and differentiation [8], and activating Ras mutations are present in ~30% of cancers [9, 10]. The ERK effector kinases of the Ras/MAPK pathway modify diverse substrates which ultimately mediate cellular pathways controlling cell growth [11]. In a genome-wide functional screen using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we previously identified IRA2 as required for cellular tolerance to HQ treatment [6]. Ira2p is a Ras GTPase activating protein (GAP) that stimulates conversion of Ras proteins from their active GTP-bound state to the inactive GDP-bound state. Deletion of IRA2 results in an increase in active Ras (and thus Ras signaling). Heterozygous germline mutations in NF1, the human homolog of IRA2, cause neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), a common developmental disorder with an incidence of 1 in 3000 live births [12]. NF1 belongs to a group of disorders referred to as the RASopathies (reviewed in [12]), caused by germline mutations in components of the RAS/MAPK pathway that all give rise to an increased cancer risk [12]. Individuals with NF1 are predisposed to benign and malignant tumors, which typically arise in cells derived from the embryonic neural crest [13, 14]. Children with NF1 have a 200–500 fold risk of developing juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), an aggressive myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) [15]. Consistent with its biochemical activity as a negative regulator of Ras signaling, JMML and other NF1-associated neoplasms frequently show somatic inactivation or the normal NF1 allele [13, 16]. Patients with NF1 are also at increased risk of developing myeloid leukemia and other genotoxin-induced malignancies [17], and homozygous mutations in NF1 were recently reported in a subset of adult acute myelogenous leukemias (AML) [14].

Homozygous inactivation of a conditional mutant allele of murine Nf1 in the hematopoietic compartment results in a progressive MPD that models JMML [18]. Heterozygous Nf1 mutant mice are also susceptible to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and other genotoxin-induced cancers, and appear to be particularly sensitive to the mutagenic effects of radiation [19, 20]. As with IRA2 in yeast, NF1 mutations lead to hyperactive Ras signaling [21, 22], and are consistent with the high prevalence of somatic NRAS and KRAS mutations in these cancers. The association between hyperactive Ras signaling and leukemogenesis is particularly compelling in JMML and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (reviewed in [9, 23]).

Altered regulation of Ras signaling and exposure to benzene and its metabolites are both leukemogenic, but the sensitivity of ira2Δ to HQ represents, to our knowledge, the first observation of a potential synergism. Other examples of synergism between exogenous compounds and altered Ras signaling include the observation that lung carcinomas induced by cumene (a compound structurally similar to HQ) have greater malignant potential in mice with K-ras mutations [24], and also that benzene-induced mammary tumors in mice show an increased frequency of H-ras mutations [25]. However, an association between Ras signaling status and HQ toxicity has not been previously defined. Here we report our study demonstrating the interaction of mutations in both IRA2 in yeast and Nf1 in murine hematopoietic cells with the cellular consequences of HQ exposure.


Modulation of Ras signaling in yeast alters the toxicity of hydroquinone

IRA2 was previously identified in a genome-wide screen for genes required for HQ tolerance [6] and sensitivity to HQ was confirmed by analysis of the individual deletion strain (Figure 1A). IRA2 is orthologous to the human tumor suppressor gene NF1, and expression of the human neurofibromin catalytic domain (GRD) in yeast recovers the phenotype of ira2Δ cells [26]. As Ira2p is a negative regulator of Ras (i.e. its deletion leads to increased Ras signaling due to decreased turnover of active-Ras) we tested other mutants in the Ras pathway that have altered signaling. Yeast has two Ras proteins, Ras1p and Ras2p, which are highly homologous to their mammalian counterparts. They exhibit some functional redundancy, like many S. cerevisiae paralogs, though Ras1p is specialized for proliferation-related signaling, whereas Ras2p regulates complex cellular differentiation (i.e. sporulation and filamentation) in response to nutrient starvation (reviewed in [27]). Deletion of RAS1 results in increased tolerance to HQ treatment, whereas deletion of RAS2 has no effect (Figure 1B, 1C and Additional file 1: Figure S1). To provide further mechanistic evidence for this observation that Ras signaling (through Ras1p) modulates HQ toxicity, we examined a RAS1 overexpression strain, and this strain also exhibits increased sensitivity to HQ (Figure 1D).

Figure 1
figure 1

The Ras status of yeast cells modulates the toxicity of HQ. The Area Under Curve (AUC) was calculated for each strain after 24 h of exposure to the indicated doses of HQ. The bars represent mean AUC as a percentage of the untreated for each strain with standard error of three replicates. Sensitivity was determined by comparison to the wild type strain (gray bars = wild type; white bars = indicated deletion/overexpression strain). A ira2Δ (increased Ras signaling) is sensitive to HQ. B ras1Δ (reduced Ras signaling) is resistant to HQ. C ras2Δ showed a response to HQ equivalent to WT. D Overexpression of RAS1 (increased Ras signaling) results in sensitivity to HQ.

Increased genotoxicity is seen in murine bone marrow cells lacking Nf1 following HQ treatment

To determine if there was an influence of Nf1 on DNA damage by HQ in mouse bone marrow cells, we assessed micronucleus (MN) formation using an in vitro erythroid MN assay [28]. Micronuclei are small fragments of nuclear membrane-encapsulated DNA formed by enucleation of cells with DNA damage during erythropoiesis. Measuring their presence in vitro can be used to sensitively detect compound genotoxicity [29] and requires fewer animals than other in vivo methods, while allowing for testing at an increased number of doses [28]. Nf1 null mice die in utero, thus a Cre/loxP system was used to generate a conditional allele (Nf1 flox) at the Nf1 locus, resulting in ablation of neurofibromin in hematopoietic tissues following the induction of Cre expression using interferon gamma [18].

We first established that HQ can induce MN in vitro as it does in the in vivo mammalian MN assay [29], and determined the appropriate dose range. Lineage-marker-negative (Lin-) BM was used as a starting population for in vitro erythropoietic MN experiments, and terminal erythropoiesis progressed normally as assayed by flow cytometry and histological examination (data not shown). Cultures were treated with HQ for 1 hour, starting 23 hours after seeding, and progressed normally through erythropoiesis. MN-PCEs appeared in both treated cultures and controls, but with greater frequency in treated cultures (Figure 2A).

Figure 2
figure 2

Detection of genotoxicity through in vitro erythropoiesis. A Representative micrograph of Day 2 harvested cultures at 100x magnification. The arrows indicate normally enucleated PCEs, and the arrowhead indicates a micronucleated PCE. Scale bar = 8 μM. B Nf1 −/− Lin- BM cultures exhibit sensitivity to MN formation after in vitro exposure to HQ. The response of this erythropoietic culture system to HQ treatment is quantified by MN frequency in PCEs. Data presented is the mean of the “n” independent cultures ± SD.

Lin- BM from Nf1 mutant mice and their WT littermates was then used to test whether the Nf1 −/− genotype affected genotoxic sensitivity to HQ. There was a higher recovery of Lin- BM cells from the Nf1 −/− mice (0.7%) than the WT littermates (0.3%). The greater recovery of Lin- BM cells in the Nf1 −/− mice is likely indicative of chronic polyclonal hyperproliferation due to hypersensitivity to GM-CSF, which is mediated by increased and prolonged Ras activation [30]. Regardless, upon culturing, erythropoietic differentiation in Nf1 −/− cultures was indistinguishable from that of WT littermates. The MN frequencies observed in vitro for both the negative controls and the treated cultures were higher than the levels typically observed in vivo[19, 20]. This increase may be caused by the relatively high rate of erythropoietic growth and lack of spleen function in vitro; increasing erythropoietic rates in vivo through bleeding [31] or exogenous erythropoietin (EPO) expression increases erythroid MN frequencies and has been shown to sensitize the in vivo assay to genotoxic exposure [32]. Cell viability at harvest was >85% for all cultures, but viable cell yields were lower for treated vs. control (data not shown). Cell proliferation and death were not explicitly measured, thus reductions in viable cell yields cannot be specifically attributed to cytotoxic or cytostatic mechanisms.

Both Nf1 −/− and WT cultures treated with hydroquinone at 50 μM, 75 μM, and 100 μM showed a significant dose-dependent increase (two-tailed unequal variance t-test, p < 0.05) in MN formation compared to the respective controls (Figure 2B – significance not indicated). A two-way ANOVA analysis found that there was an overall significant difference between the MN frequency found in the Nf1 −/− cultures and the corresponding WT cultures (p < 0.001). A two-tailed unequal variance Student’s t-test was employed to examine the differences at each dose. There was no significant difference in MN formation between the untreated cultures (p = 0.87) but there was a significantly greater induction of MN in the Nf1 −/− cultures than the WT cultures at both 50 μM (p < 0.01) and 100 μM (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B). This observation indicates that increased Ras signaling increases the genotoxicity of HQ.

Murine bone marrow progenitor cells lacking Nf1 show increased proliferation relative to WT following treatment with HQ

To further investigate the possible role of Nf1 in development of hematological malignancies such as leukemia following exposure to HQ, we measured the proliferative ability of myeloid hematopoietic progenitor cells after treatment. We assayed CFU-GM colony growth at several HQ dosage levels for WT and Nf1 −/− bone marrow cells and normalized this data to the untreated controls (Figure 3). HQ caused a dose-dependent decrease in the proliferative ability of progenitor cells in both WT and Nf1 −/− cells, in agreement with a previous study [33]. In both genotypes, colony formation was reduced upon exposure to as little as 10 μM HQ, and CFU-GM numbers continued to fall with increasing HQ exposure up to 30 μM HQ treatment (Figure 3). At higher doses of HQ (e.g. 100 μM), all colony formation was prevented by excessive toxicity to both genotypes (data not shown). Unexpectedly, Nf1 −/− progenitors demonstrated significantly increased survival to HQ exposure in comparison to WT (Figure 3) at 10 μM [p-value 0.0010]. We cannot ascribe these apparent differences to MPD in the Nf1 −/− mice because the inhibitory effects of HQ were normalized to growth in the absence of HQ for both genotypes. Moreover, the Nf1 −/− mice were euthanized at a relatively young age (12 weeks) and showed no overt evidence of myeloid disease as assessed by complete blood counts conducted on the harvest BM (data not shown). Thus, the difference observed is likely driven specifically by the HQ treatment.

Figure 3
figure 3

Nf1 −/− hematopoietic progenitors of the granulocyte and macrophage lineages are resistant to HQ-induced toxicity. CFU-GM colony counts, relative to untreated controls, are plotted vs. HQ exposure level for cultures derived from both WT and Nf1 −/− BM. Bone marrow cells from each genotype were treated with HQ in MethoCult® capable of inducing growth of CFU-GM colonies and then cultured for 12 days. In both genotypes colony formation was reduced upon exposure to as little as 10 μM HQ. CFU-GM numbers continued to fall with increasing HQ exposure up to 30 μM HQ treatment, and at all doses the Nf1 −/− BM appeared resistant to HQ-induced toxicity when compared with BM from WT littermates.


Hydroquinone (HQ) is a benzene metabolite, component of cigarette smoke, and skin-bleaching agent. A genome-wide functional screen in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified IRA2 as required for tolerance to treatment with HQ.

IRA2 is a yeast ortholog of the human tumor suppressor gene NF1, mutations in which cause the disease neurofibromatosis type I (NF1). Affected individuals are pre-disposed to developing cancers, including leukemia, due to increased Ras signaling [13]. The Ras protein family is involved in signal transduction, and their activation leads to growth, differentiation and cellular survival. NF1 has been recently identified as important in the development of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) [14], the same form of leukemia that is associated with exposure to benzene, an established human leukemogen. However, the association between Ras status and HQ toxicity has not been defined. Our previous identification of IRA2 as required for HQ tolerance was the first observation of a potential synergism between Ras signaling and the toxicity of benzene. To gain further insight into this association we investigated the requirement of both IRA2 in yeast and Nf1 in murine hematopoietic cells for the response to HQ.

The sensitivity of yeast cells lacking IRA2 to HQ was confirmed by analysis of the ira2Δ deletion strain. We found that while ira2Δ cells with increased levels of active Ras were more sensitive to HQ treatment, ras1Δ cells with decreased active Ras were less sensitive, and actually showed resistance to HQ. Consistent with these data, we also found that cells overexpressing RAS1 (effectively phenocopying ira2Δ) show increased sensitivity to HQ. This confirmed that ira2Δ HQ sensitivity is not due to a specific property of Ira2p and provides substantial support for our hypothesis that the level of active Ras signaling modulates the toxicity of HQ.

How could increased Ras signaling cause an increase in HQ toxicity? The observation that modulation of HQ toxicity is specific to signaling through Ras1p (ras2Δ showed a response to HQ equivalent to WT) provides a potential explanation. Ras1p regulates progression of the cell cycle, and an increase in cell cycle rate could explain increased HQ toxicity. HQ has multiple cellular targets in yeast, including the cytoskeleton and vesicular transport, and it generates oxidative stress, causes lipid peroxidation and damages DNA [6]. The deleterious effects of these processes could be amplified in the context of increased cell cycle rate, and so would result in an increase in growth inhibition.

In order to study the significance of our findings in human health, we studied the relationship between Nf1 and HQ tolerance in a murine model. We determined that the Nf1 −/− genotype renders mammalian bone marrow progenitor cells more sensitive to genotoxic damage by HQ, as measured by an increase in micronuclei formation. We have shown that HQ treatment causes a dose-dependent decrease in the number of CFU-GM colonies derived from both WT and Nf1 −/− progenitors. However, in contrast to the yeast studies, HQ treated Nf1 −/− cell showed increased proliferation in comparison to wild type cells. Our work and previous studies showed that untreated Nf1 −/− cells show increased proliferation due to hyperactive Ras [34], but even after normalization for this effect, HQ treatment at the doses used further increased proliferation of WT progenitors. We therefore propose that null cells may more rapidly divide down the differentiation lineages than WT (regardless of damage), and this higher proliferation of damaged cells could explain the greater MN frequency. By both increasing genetic damage and enhancing survival in Nf1 mutant hematopoietic cells, HQ could facilitate the development of myeloid malignancies such as MDS and AML.

One possible explanation for this increased relative growth is that HQ could stimulate GM progenitor growth via ERK1/ERK2 and synergize with GM-CSF. Support for this idea comes from the observation that HQ stimulates GM-CSF-dependent proliferation of erythroleukemia cells and human CD34+ bone marrow cells via activation of ERK [35]. As noted above, in primary Nf1 −/− progenitor cells there is constitutive activation of Ras [34]. GM-CSF [34] mediates an increased and prolonged Ras activation [30] and Nf1 −/− cells, unable to modulate this effect, are hypersensitive to GM-CSF. Further, HQ acts synergistically with GM-CSF to induce proliferation of progenitor cells that would not normally be recruited by the cytokine [36]. Deletion of Nf1 potentiates this effect due to increased Ras activation. Interestingly, 1,4-BQ (from HQ) also induces activation of ERK1 and ERK2 [37] in rat liver epithelial cells so it is possible that HQ could have a similar effect in bone marrow cells. Similarly, the hyperactive Ras effect of Nf1 −/− on erythroid progenitors acts specifically through the ERK pathway and not through other pathways regulated by Ras [38]. We therefore suggest that the combination of hyper-sensitization to GM-CSF in Nf1 −/− cells and activation of ERK by HQ could explain the increased proliferation of null cells relative to WT following HQ treatment. Alternatively or in addition, DNA damage caused by HQ may stimulate proliferation of GM progenitors in Nf1 −/− cells via p53 dependent mechanisms. Previous work found that the genotoxin cytarabine causes increased myeloid differentiation in bone marrow cells with a Ras mutation via a p53-dependent mechanism [39].


Together our findings show that HQ toxicity is modulated by Ras signaling and that increased Ras signaling (by deleting Nf1) results in both an increased level of DNA damage detected in erythroid progenitors and increased survival of GM progenitors. HQ exposure and pre-existing increased Ras signaling could increase the likelihood of leukemic transformation. Importantly, our observations with HQ are highly consistent with observations in human patients and in mice showing that heterozygous Nf1 inactivation cooperates strongly with genotoxins (particularly radiation) to induce myeloid malignancies and other secondary cancers [17, 19]. In addition to NF1, individuals with Noonan syndrome and other RASopathies could be more vulnerable to developing myeloid diseases after exposure to benzene. Of particular concern is the use of hydroquinone as a skin-lightening agent by NF1 patients. HQ is given to NF1 patients to treat the characteristic cafe-au-lait pigmentation spots, which are a key diagnostic criterion of NF1. Our work indicates that the interaction between Ras signaling, sensitivity to toxicants, and the development of neoplasia needs to be given further consideration. Such studies may aid in the development of more protective standards for sensitive individuals to occupational and public exposures to carcinogens such as benzene.


Yeast strains and culture

Diploid yeast deletion strains used for growth analyses were of the BY4743 background (MATa/MATα, his3∆1/his3∆1, leu2∆0/leu2∆0, lys∆0/LYS2, MET15/met15∆0, ura3∆0/ura3∆0, Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA). The haploid yeast MORF (Movable ORF - [40]) strain for RAS1 overexpression was of the Y258 background (MATa, pep4-3, his4-580, ura3-53, leu2-3,112 - Thermo Fisher Scientific Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL). Growth was conducted in liquid rich media (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, YPD) for deletion strain growth curve assays, and liquid synthetic complete media lacking uracil (SC-ura) using either 2% dextrose or 2% raffinose as a carbon source for pre-growths of the overexpression strain for growth curve assays (detailed below). Liquid rich media for induction of protein overexpression for growth curve assays contained both galactose and raffinose (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% galactose, 2% raffinose, YPGal + Raf).

Yeast hydroquinone exposures

Hydroquinone (HQ) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) stock solutions were prepared fresh in sterile nuclease-free water (ISC BioExpress, Kaysville, UT) and protected from light.

Yeast deletion strain growth curve assays

Yeast strains were pre-grown to mid-log phase, diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.0165, and dispensed into individual wells of a 48-well plate (non-treated polystyrene, Grenier Bio-One, Monroe, NC). HQ stock solution was added to the desired final concentrations with at least two replicates per dose. Plates were incubated in a GENios microplate reader (Tecan, Durham, NC) set to 30°C with intermittent shaking. OD595 measurements were taken at 15-minute intervals for a period of 24 hours. Raw absorbance data were averaged for all replicates, background corrected, and plotted as a function of time. The area under the curve (AUC), used as a measure of growth, was calculated with Excel 2008 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and expressed as a percentage of the control. AUCs were compared with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests, using GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Data for each strain is derived from three independent biological replicates.

Yeast RAS1 overexpression strain growth curve assays

The yeast RAS1 overexpression strain was pre-grown overnight to stationary phase in SC-ura 2% dextrose, diluted 1:100 in SC-ura 2% raffinose and grown overnight again to alleviate glucose repression. Cells were then diluted in YPGal + Raf to induce protein overexpression, and grown for 5 hours to mid-log phase. Cells were subsequently diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.0165 in YPGal + Raf, and dispensed into wells of a 48-well plate. Hydroquinone treatment, plate measurement and data processing were all carried out in the same manner as for the deletion strain growth curve assays.


Mx1-Cre, Nf1 flox/flox mice (129SV × C57BL/6 J) were generated and somatic Nf1 inactivation was induced as described elsewhere [18]. We refer to hematopoietic cells from these animals as Nf1 −/− throughout this paper. Cells from wild type (WT) littermates were used as controls in all experiments. Mice were maintained in the sterile animal care facility at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and were fed pelleted chow and acidified water ad libitum. All experimental procedures involving mice were approved by the UCSF Committee on Animal Research.

Murine cells

Tissue was harvested from mice at ~12 weeks. Bone marrow (BM) cells were isolated from the hind legs and were mechanically dissociated by pipetting in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) with L-glutamine/4% FBS (IMDM – Lonza, Walkersville, MD). Single-cell suspensions were prepared by passing dissociated cells through 70 μm cell strainers. BM cells were counted using a hemocytometer.

Erythropoietic culture

Total BM cells were labeled with biotin-conjugated α-Lin Abs, consisting of α -CD3e, α -CD11b, α -CD45R/B220, α -Ly6G/Ly6C, and α -TER-119 Abs (2 μl of each Ab/106 cells; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), and Lineage-marker-negative (Lin-) cells were purified through a 0.3-in StemSep negative selection column as per the manufacturer’s instructions (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Purified cells were seeded in fibronectin-coated (2 μg/cm2) tissue culture treated 24-well polystyrene plates (BD Falcon, BD Biosciences San Jose, CA) at a cell density of 105 cells/ml. On the first day, purified cells were cultured in IMDM containing basal supplements consisting of: 15% FBS, 1% detoxified BSA, 200 μg/ml holotransferrin (Sigma, St Louis, MO), 10 μg/ml recombinant human insulin (Sigma), 10-4 M β-mercaptoethanol, 50 units/ml penicillin G, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin; as well as soluble erythropoietic factors including erythropoietin (Epo - Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) at 7.5 units/ml and stem cell factor (SCF - R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 10 ng/ml. For all cultures, media was replaced with erythroid-differentiation medium (EDM) (IMDM with 20% FBS, and 10-4 M β-mercaptoethanol) after 1 day of culture. At harvest, suspended cells were removed from culture wells by pipetting, and the culture well was then incubated in PBS/10% FBS/5 mM EDTA for 5 minutes at 37°C to dissociate adherent cells. Dissociated cells were then removed from the culture well by pipetting and combined with the suspended cell fraction from the same culture well for analysis. Viable cell counts, based on trypan blue exclusion, were conducted using a hemocytometer.

Genotoxic treatment of erythropoietic cultures

Lin- BM was cultured in 500 μl of medium per culture well according to the method described for erythropoietic culture. Cultures were treated one hour before being washed and fed with EDM, as earlier described. HQ solutions were prepared immediately before treatment and protected from light to minimize degradation and decreased reactivity. HQ (Sigma) was first dissolved in warm PBS to make a 10 mM stock solution. This 10 mM solution was diluted in 4°C PBS to produce 7.575 mM and 5.05 mM solutions, and 5 μl of a solution was added to each culture to expose them to the targeted concentrations of HQ (100 μM, 75 μM, and 50 μM).

Cytospin preparation and cytological staining

Approximately 2×104 cells per culture were centrifuged onto slides for 2 minutes at 800 rpm (Statspin Cytofuge 2; Iris Sample Processing Westwood, MA) and air-dried. For acridine orange staining, cells were fixed in 25°C methanol for 10 minutes and stained in acridine orange (Sigma) at a concentration of 20 μg/ml in staining buffer (19 mM NaH2PO4 and 81 mM Na2HPO4) for 10 minutes at 4°C. Following acridine orange staining, slides were protected from light, washed for 10 minutes in 4°C staining buffer, air-dried, and stored at 4°C until microscopic examination and scoring was complete.

Histological imaging and quantification

Slides were examined by using an Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH, Germany) and representative micrographs were acquired by using Axiocam MRm (Carl Zeiss). Micrographs of acridine orange stained cells were acquired by using a 63x oil-immersion objective and fluorescence (100 W Hg lamp excitation). Cytological slides were examined blind, and differential cell counting was used to enumerate relevant cell types and thus quantify the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN-PCEs) among total PCEs (>2,000 PCEs scored per slide).


To determine the statistical significance of mean comparisons, distributions were first checked for normality by using the Shapiro–Wilk's test with STATA 11 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Normal data sets were then subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis. Interaction between dose and breed was examined but found to be insignificant and so was not used in the model. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were executed by using the data analysis tool in Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). Unequal variance was assumed to increase confidence in significant p-values.

Progenitor assays

Colony forming unit granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) progenitors were grown in MethoCult® (StemCell Technologies, Cat #03434) according to manufacturer’s instructions (Technical Manual Cat# 28405). Briefly, BM cells were suspended at 4×105/ml in IMDM/2% FBS and then 200 μl of this suspension was added to 4 ml aliquots of MethoCult® M3434, which were then vortexed briefly. A fresh solution of 10 mM HQ (Sigma) was then prepared in warm PBS and sterile filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane (Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI). This 10 mM HQ stock solution was then further diluted to give 600 μM, 400 μM, and 200 μM solutions, and then 200ul of one of these solutions was used to treat each 4 ml aliquot of MethoCult® at a concentration of 30 μM, 20 μM, or 10 μM. After delivery of HQ, the MethoCult® was again vortexed briefly and the tubes were left to stand for 5 minutes to allow bubbles to dissipate. A 16G blunt-end needle and 3 ml syringe were then used to draw up the treated MethoCult® and dispense 1.1 ml into each of three 35 mm petri dishes (StemCell Technologies, Cat# 27100). These 35 mm culture dishes (3 per genotype/treatment replicate) were then tilted and rotated gently to evenly distribute MethoCult® and placed in a 100 mm culture dish that also contained an uncovered 35 mm culture dish containing 3 ml of sterile water to maintain humidity. The cultures were placed in an incubator and maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air, and >95% humidity for 12 days, then colonies were scored. The scoring scientist was blinded to the identity of each culture (genotype/treatment). Two independent preparations of each culture condition (combination of genotype/treatment) were used in each trial, and the entire experiment was repeated three further times using independent sets of Nf1 −/−/WT littermates.


  1. Smith MT: Advances in understanding benzene health effects and susceptibility. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31: 33-148. 132 p following 148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pons M, Cousins SW, Csaky KG, Striker G, Marin-Castano ME: Cigarette smoke-related hydroquinone induces filamentous actin reorganization and heat shock protein 27 phosphorylation through p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in retinal pigment epithelium: implications for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Pathol. 2010, 177 (3): 1198-1213. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Deisinger PJ, Hill TS, English JC: Human exposure to naturally occurring hydroquinone. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1996, 47 (1): 31-46. 10.1080/009841096161915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill DP, Ahmed AE: Covalent binding of [14C]benzene to cellular organelles and bone marrow nucleic acids. Biochem Pharmacol. 1981, 30 (10): 1127-1131. 10.1016/0006-2952(81)90452-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaskell M, McLuckie KI, Farmer PB: Genotoxicity of the benzene metabolites para-benzoquinone and hydroquinone. Chem Biol Interact. 2005, 153–154: 267-270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. North M, Tandon VJ, Thomas R, Loguinov A, Gerlovina I, Hubbard AE, Zhang L, Smith MT, Vulpe CD: Genome-wide functional profiling reveals genes required for tolerance to benzene metabolites in yeast. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (8): e24205-10.1371/journal.pone.0024205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith MT: The mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia: a hypothesis and speculations on the causes of leukemia. Environ Health Perspect. 1996, 104 (Suppl 6): 1219-1225. 10.1289/ehp.961041219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Buday L, Downward J: Many faces of Ras activation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1786 (2): 178-187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun BS, Shannon K: Targeting Ras in myeloid leukemias. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (8): 2249-2252. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ward AF, Braun BS, Shannon KM: Targeting oncogenic Ras signaling in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2012, 120 (17): 3397-3406. 10.1182/blood-2012-05-378596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoon S, Seger R: The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions. Growth Factors. 2006, 24 (1): 21-44. 10.1080/02699050500284218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tidyman WE, Rauen KA: The RASopathies: developmental syndromes of Ras/MAPK pathway dysregulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009, 19 (3): 230-236. 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cichowski K, Jacks T: NF1 tumor suppressor gene function: narrowing the GAP. Cell. 2001, 104 (4): 593-604. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00245-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parkin B, Ouillette P, Wang Y, Liu Y, Wright W, Roulston D, Purkayastha A, Dressel A, Karp J, Bockenstedt P, et al: NF1 inactivation in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16 (16): 4135-4147. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stiller CA, Chessells JM, Fitchett M: Neurofibromatosis and childhood leukaemia/lymphoma: a population-based UKCCSG study. Br J Cancer. 1994, 70 (5): 969-972. 10.1038/bjc.1994.431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shannon KM, O'Connell P, Martin GA, Paderanga D, Olson K, Dinndorf P, McCormick F: Loss of the normal NF1 allele from the bone marrow of children with type 1 neurofibromatosis and malignant myeloid disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330 (9): 597-601. 10.1056/NEJM199403033300903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maris JM, Wiersma SR, Mahgoub N, Thompson P, Geyer RJ, Hurwitz CG, Lange BJ, Shannon KM: Monosomy 7 myelodysplastic syndrome and other second malignant neoplasms in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer. 1997, 79 (7): 1438-1446. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970401)79:7<1438::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-#.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Le DT, Kong N, Zhu Y, Lauchle JO, Aiyigari A, Braun BS, Wang E, Kogan SC, Le Beau MM, Parada L, et al: Somatic inactivation of Nf1 in hematopoietic cells results in a progressive myeloproliferative disorder. Blood. 2004, 103 (11): 4243-4250. 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chao RC, Pyzel U, Fridlyand J, Kuo YM, Teel L, Haaga J, Borowsky A, Horvai A, Kogan SC, Bonifas J, et al: Therapy-induced malignant neoplasms in Nf1 mutant mice. Cancer Cell. 2005, 8 (4): 337-348. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura JL, Phong C, Pinarbasi E, Kogan SC, Vandenberg S, Horvai AE, Faddegon BA, Fiedler D, Shokat K, Houseman BT, et al: Dose-dependent effects of focal fractionated irradiation on secondary malignant neoplasms in Nf1 mutant mice. Cancer Res. 2011, 71 (1): 106-115. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, Adler F, Zhang YY, Thompson P, Lange BJ, Freedman MH, McCormick F, Jacks T, et al: Loss of NF1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in haematopoietic cells. Nat Genet. 1996, 12 (2): 144-148. 10.1038/ng0296-144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mullally A, Ebert BL: NF1 inactivation revs up Ras in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16 (16): 4074-4076. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lauchle JO, Braun BS, Loh ML, Shannon K: Inherited predispositions and hyperactive Ras in myeloid leukemogenesis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006, 46 (5): 579-585. 10.1002/pbc.20644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wakamatsu N, Collins JB, Parker JS, Tessema M, Clayton NP, Ton TV, Hong HH, Belinsky S, Devereux TR, Sills RC, et al: Gene expression studies demonstrate that the K-ras/Erk MAP kinase signal transduction pathway and other novel pathways contribute to the pathogenesis of cumene-induced lung tumors. Toxicol Pathol. 2008, 36 (5): 743-752. 10.1177/0192623308320801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Houle CD, Ton TV, Clayton N, Huff J, Hong HH, Sills RC: Frequent p53 and H-ras mutations in benzene- and ethylene oxide-induced mammary gland carcinomas from B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Pathol. 2006, 34 (6): 752-762. 10.1080/01926230600935912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu GF, Lin B, Tanaka K, Dunn D, Wood D, Gesteland R, White R, Weiss R, Tamanoi F: The catalytic domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product stimulates ras GTPase and complements ira mutants of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990, 63 (4): 835-841. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90149-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weeks G, Spiegelman GB: Roles played by Ras subfamily proteins in the cell and developmental biology of microorganisms. Cell Signal. 2003, 15 (10): 901-909. 10.1016/S0898-6568(03)00073-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shuga J, Zhang J, Samson LD, Lodish HF, Griffith LG: In vitro erythropoiesis from bone marrow-derived progenitors provides a physiological assay for toxic and mutagenic compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (21): 8737-8742. 10.1073/pnas.0701829104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller BM, Zitzelsberger HF, Weier HU, Adler ID: Classification of micronuclei in murine erythrocytes: immunofluorescent staining using CREST antibodies compared to in situ hybridization with biotinylated gamma satellite DNA. Mutagenesis. 1991, 6 (4): 297-302. 10.1093/mutage/6.4.297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Largaespada DA, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Nf1 deficiency causes Ras-mediated granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor hypersensitivity and chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nat Genet. 1996, 12 (2): 137-143. 10.1038/ng0296-137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirai O, Miyamae Y, Fujino Y, Izumi H, Miyamoto A, Noguchi H: Prior bleeding enhances the sensitivity of the in vivo micronucleus test. Mutat Res. 1991, 264 (3): 109-114. 10.1016/0165-7992(91)90125-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Suzuki Y, Nagae Y, Ishikawa T, Watanabe Y, Nagashima T, Matsukubo K, Shimizu H: Effect of erythropoietin on the micronucleus test. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1989, 13 (4): 314-318. 10.1002/em.2850130406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Irons RD, Stillman WS, Colagiovanni DB, Henry VA: Synergistic action of the benzene metabolite hydroquinone on myelopoietic stimulating activity of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (9): 3691-3695. 10.1073/pnas.89.9.3691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang YY, Vik TA, Ryder JW, Srour EF, Jacks T, Shannon K, Clapp DW: Nf1 regulates hematopoietic progenitor cell growth and ras signaling in response to multiple cytokines. J Exp Med. 1998, 187 (11): 1893-1902. 10.1084/jem.187.11.1893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng JH, Pyatt DW, Gross SA, Le AT, Kerzic PJ, Irons RD: Hydroquinone modulates the GM-CSF signaling pathway in TF-1 cells. Leukemia. 2004, 18 (7): 1296-1304. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeCaprio AP: The toxicology of hydroquinone–relevance to occupational and environmental exposure. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1999, 29 (3): 283-330. 10.1080/10408449991349221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abdelmohsen K, Gerber PA, von Montfort C, Sies H, Klotz LO: Epidermal growth factor receptor is a common mediator of quinone-induced signaling leading to phosphorylation of connexin-43: role of glutathione and tyrosine phosphatases. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (40): 38360-38367. 10.1074/jbc.M306785200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang J, Lodish HF: Constitutive activation of the MEK/ERK pathway mediates all effects of oncogenic H-ras expression in primary erythroid progenitors. Blood. 2004, 104 (6): 1679-1687. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer M, Rubsamen D, Slany R, Illmer T, Stabla K, Roth P, Stiewe T, Eilers M, Neubauer A: Oncogenic RAS enables DNA damage- and p53-dependent differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells in response to chemotherapy. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (11): e7768-10.1371/journal.pone.0007768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gelperin DM, White MA, Wilkinson ML, Kon Y, Kung LA, Wise KJ, Lopez-Hoyo N, Jiang L, Piccirillo S, Yu H, et al: Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (23): 2816-2826. 10.1101/gad.1362105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


We thank Luis Parada (UT Southwestern) for providing Nf1 mutant mice, Michael Crone and Kimberly Krisman for assistance with animal care and handling, Sharon Louie, Jimmy Duong, and Paul Shiu for technical assistance, and Dr. Abby Leeder for critical reading of the manuscript. MN was a postdoctoral trainee and MF was a graduate trainee in the Superfund Research Program at the University of California, Berkeley.

This research was supported by NIEHS under Award Number P42ES004705. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of either NIH or NIEHS. JS was supported by the Canary Foundation and American Cancer Society Early Detection Postdoctoral Fellowship. KS is supported by NIH grant CA72614 and an American Cancer Society Research Professorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris D Vulpe.

Additional information

Competing interests

MTS has received consulting and expert testimony fees from law firms representing both plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving claims related to exposure to benzene.

Authors’ contributions

MN, JS, MF, KS, LZ, MTS and CDV conceived and designed the experiments. MN, JS, and MF performed the experiments. MN, JS, MF and AL analyzed the data. KS, LZ, MTS and CDV contributed reagents and materials. MN, JS, MF, KS, LZ, MTS and CDV wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Figure S1: ras2Δ is significantly more sensitive to HQ than ras1Δ. The Area Under Curve (AUC) was calculated for each strain after 24 h of exposure to the indicated doses of HQ. The bars represent mean AUC as a percentage of the untreated for each strain with standard error of three replicates. Sensitivity was determined by comparison to the wild type strain (gray bars = ras1Δ; white bars = ras2Δ). (PDF 102 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

North, M., Shuga, J., Fromowitz, M. et al. Modulation of Ras signaling alters the toxicity of hydroquinone, a benzene metabolite and component of cigarette smoke. BMC Cancer 14, 6 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: