This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The association of TP53 mutations with the resistance of colorectal carcinoma to the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor picropodophyllin
- Quan Wang†1Email author,
- Feng Wei†1,
- Guoyue Lv1,
- Chunsheng Li2,
- Tongjun Liu2,
- Costas G Hadjipanayis3,
- Guikai Zhang4,
- Chunhai Hao4 and
- Anita C Bellail4
© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 April 2013
Accepted: 31 October 2013
Published: 4 November 2013
There is growing evidence indicating the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plays a critical role in the progression of human colorectal carcinomas. IGF-1R is an attractive drug target for the treatment of colon cancer. Picropodophyllin (PPP), of the cyclolignan family, has recently been identified as an IGF-1R inhibitor. The aim of this study is to determine the therapeutic response and mechanism after colorectal carcinoma treatment with PPP.
Seven colorectal carcinoma cell lines were treated with PPP. Following treatment, cells were analyzed for growth by a cell viability assay, sub-G1 apoptosis by flow cytometry, caspase cleavage and activation of AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) by western blot analysis. To examine the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of PPP, mice implanted with human colorectal carcinoma xenografts underwent PPP treatment.
PPP treatment blocked the phosphorylation of IGF-1R, AKT and ERK and inhibited the growth of TP53 wild-type but not mutated colorectal carcinoma cell lines. The treatment of PPP also induced apoptosis in TP53 wild-type cells as evident by the presence of sub-G1 cells and the cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3, DNA fragmentation factor-45 (DFF45), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). The loss of BAD phosphorylation in the PPP-treated TP53 wild type cells further suggested that the treatment induced apoptosis through the BAD-mediated mitochondrial pathway. In contrast, PPP treatment failed to induce the phosphorylation of AKT and ERK and caspase cleavage in TP53 mutated colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Finally, PPP treatment suppressed the growth of xenografts derived from TP53 wild type but not mutated colorectal carcinoma cells.
We report the association of TP53 mutations with the resistance of treatment of colorectal carcinoma cells in culture and in a xenograft mouse model with the IGF-1R inhibitor PPP. TP53 mutations often occur in colorectal carcinomas and could be used as a biomarker to predict the resistance of colorectal carcinomas to the treatment by this IGF-1R inhibitor.
The IGF-1R signaling pathway plays an important role in the formation and progression of human cancers and has been targeted for cancer treatment . IGF-1R is a membrane- associated receptor tyrosine kinase that controls both cell growth and apoptosis. Insulin-like growth factor-I and -II (IGF-I; IGF-II) ligand binding to IGF-1R leads to the phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins, resulting in the activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT and downstream signaling pathways . IGF-1R inhibits the apoptosis pathway through AKT-mediated phosphorylation of BAD, a pro-apoptotic protein of the BCL2 family . Phosphorylated BAD is dissociated from the BCL-2 family proteins that protect mitochondrial membrane potential and thus inhibit mitochondrial release of apoptotic factors . In addition, IGF-1R activates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway that protect colorectal carcinoma cells from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) induced apoptosis . By activating PI3K/AKT and ERK growth pathways and inhibiting the BAD and TNFα-mediated apoptosis, the IGF-1R signaling pathway promotes the survival, growth, and metastasis of colorectal carcinomas [1, 6].
Epidemiological studies have revealed the association of high concentrations of serum IGF-I and IGF-II with the increased risk of developing several human cancers including colorectal carcinomas [7–10]. Examination of colorectal carcinomas has revealed elevation of the transcripts of IGF-I/II [11–13] and IGF-1R [14, 15]. These findings suggest that IGF-I/II may interact with IGF-1R on the cancer cell surface and promote cancer growth through paracrine and autocrine loops and targeting of the IGF-IGF-1R pathway may lead to the development of cancer therapeutics . IGF-1R has been targeted by two types of therapeutic agents: IGR-1R neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and small molecule IGF-1R inhibitors [16, 17]. Monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors have been characterized in preclinical studies  and some have been taken to clinical trials for cancer treatments [19, 20]. Preliminary data from current clinical trials have revealed resistance of human cancers to treatment [1, 16]. For example, a phase II trial of an IGF-1R antibody has shown a limited response with treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinomas .
The characterization of the crystallographic structures of the insulin receptor and IGF-1R has enabled the development of IGF-1R specific inhibitors [22–24]. Picropodophyllin (PPP), a member of the cyclolignan family, has been identified as an IGF-1R inhibitor  since it specifically blocks the phosphorylation of the Tyr 1136 residue in the IGF-1R activation loop and thus inhibits the phosphorylation and kinase activity of the receptor . PPP blocks the PI3K/AKT pathway , induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells , and suppresses the growth of multiple myeloma and glioblastoma xenografts [28–30]. Phase I/II trials have been launched for treatment of glioblastoma, hematological malignancies, and non-small cell lung carcinoma by picropodophyllin (AXL1717).
In this study, we investigated the therapeutic response of human colorectal carcinomas with the recently identified IGF-1R inhibitor, PPP . Multiple colorectal carcinoma cell lines were used in addition to colorectal xenografts generated in mice to study the therapeutic response. We examined the IGF-1R downstream AKT and ERK growth pathways and BAD-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in PPP-treated colorectal carcinoma cells. These studies found the majority of the carcinoma cell lines were resistant to PPP treatment due to the failure of AKT and ERK activation as well as induction of BAD-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, these studies revealed the association of TP53 mutations with PPP resistance in the carcinoma cell lines in culture and a xenograft model. While human colorectal carcinomas harbor frequent mutations of APC, TP53, PIK3CA and KRAS, our findings suggest that the TP53 mutations are associated with the resistance of colorectal carcinoma to the IGF-1R inhibitor, PPP.
Human colorectal carcinoma cell lines, tumors and normal colon tissues
Human colorectal carcinoma cell lines CACAO-2, COLO-205, COLO-320, DLD-1, HCT-8, HT29 and SW948 were purchased from American Type Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD). Each cell line was grown in RPMI1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were maintained in a humidified 37°C and 5% CO2 incubator. Human colorectal carcinoma and matched adjacent normal colorectal tissue samples were collected in accordance with the protocols approved by the institutional Review Board of the First Hospital of Jilin University. All patients provided written informed consent for the tissue sample collection. This study was approved by the First Hospital Ethical Committee of Jilin University.
IGF-1R inhibitor and antibodies
PPP were purchased from Calbiochem (EMD Millipore) and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DSMO) at the concentration of 10 mM and stored in aliquots at −80°C. Recombinant human IGF-I was also purchased from Calbiochem and stored in aliquots at −80°C. The antibodies used in this study were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA) against the human caspase-9, phospho-IRS-1, AKT, phospho-AKT (Ser473), ERK, phopho-ERK (Thr202/Thr204), IGF-1R, phospho-IGF-1R (Y1135/1136), BAD and phospho-BAD (Ser112/Ser136). Other primary antibodies used in the study included those against the human poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), caspase-3 (StressGen, Ann Harbor, MI), DNF fragmentation factor-45 (DFF45), β-actin, BCL-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), MDM2 (sigma Aldrich) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). The secondary antibodies used in this study were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) and goat anti-rabbit antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Protease inhibitor mixture, Triton x-100 and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Chemiluminescence was from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ).
Cell viability assay
Cells were grown in 96-well plates at 8x103 cells per well in 100 μl of growth medium. Cells were treated or untreated with PPP in the concentrations as indicated in the Results. After incubation for the times indicated in the Results, cells were washed with a phosphate buffer and 100 μl buffer 0.2 M containing sodium acetate (pH 5.5), 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 20 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate was added to each of the wells. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours and the reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 μl 1 M NaOH to each well, Absorbance were measured at 405 nm by a microplate reader (BioRad).
Flow cytometric assay for the cell cycle and sub-G1 apoptotic cells
Cells were treated with 1 μM PP242 and 2 μM erlotinib, alone or in combination, for 20 hours, harvested, fixed with 70% ethanol, and stained with propidium iodide. The data were acquired using flow cytometry (FACSCanto II Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NY) and were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc. Ashland, OR). Sub-G1 apoptotic cells were determined as a percentage of the cells.
Western blotting was performed according to our laboratory protocols . In brief, cells were lysed in a cell lysis buffer (20 nM Tris pH7.4, 150 mM NaCL, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol,1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM imidazole, 1.15 mM sodium molybdate, 4 mM sodium tartrate dihydrate, and 1x protease inhibitor cocktail). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 18,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford protein assay following the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Equal amounts of protein were separated through SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody and then for 1 hour with HP-conjugated secondary antibody. The membranes were developed by chemiluminescence.
Mouse subcutaneous xenografts and treatments
The animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Emory University. The HCT-8 cells or Caco2 cells (7 × 106) were implanted subcutaneously into the flank regions of six-week old (about 20 g of body weight) female athymic (nu/nu) mice (Taconic, Hudson, NY). The mice were allowed to develop subcutaneous xenografts and tumor volumes were measured using caliper measurements. When tumors reached approximately 150–200 mm3, mice were assigned randomly to 2 experimental groups (n = 4 per group) and treated either with saline as control or PPP (50 mg/kg) through oral gavages, twice per week. Tumor volumes were measured once every 3 days and calculated based on the formula: V =4/3 × π × (length/2 × [width/2]2). At the end of treatment, the mice were sacrificed and the tumors were harvested and weighed at necropsy.
All data were presented as means ± SE. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism version 5.01 software for Windows (GraphPad Software). The differences in the means between two groups were analyzed with two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. Results were considered to be statistically significant at P <0.05.
TP53mutated colorectal carcinoma cells are resistant to PPP treatment
Next, we examined how colorectal carcinoma cell lines respond to PPP treatment. To this end, each of the cell lines was treated with a series of PPP concentrations for 72 hours. A cell viability assay showed PPP treatment significantly inhibited the growth of the sensitive cell lines HCT-8 and SW948. Slight inhibition of the growth of the resistant cell lines CACO-2, COLO-205, COLO-320, DLD-1 and HT-29 was found at much higher doses (Figure 1C). The PPP resistant cell lines were reported with TP53 mutations  according to the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cancergenome/projects/cosmic). In contrast, HCT-8  and SW948 (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cancergenome/projects/cosmic) are TP53 wild-type cell lines. These analyses suggest the association of TP53 mutations with the PPP resistance of colorectal carcinoma cells to PPP treatment.
PPP treatment enhances AKT and ERK phosphorylation in TP53mt carcinoma cells
Earlier studies have clearly shown that PPP treatment leads to the downregulation of IGF-1R through MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of the IGF-1R protein . Both IGF-1R and p53 proteins are the substrates of the ubiquitin ligase MDM2 . To explore the role of MDM2 in the resistance of mutated TP53 cell lines to PPP, we examined the protein levels of MDM2 in wild-type and mutated TP53 cell lines by western blotting. The data revealed no difference in the expression of MDM2 protein between TP53 wild-type and mutated cell lines (Figure 2B). Next, we examined the kinetics of IGF-1R degradation under the treatment of IGF-1 and PPP, alone and in combination. To this end, we compared the IGF-1R protein levels between the TP53 wild-type SW948 and mutated CACO-2 since these two cell lines expressed IGF-1R protein at similar levels (Figure 1B). Western blotting revealed that PPP treatment reduced the levels of IGF-1R protein in both SW948 and CACO-2 cells (Figure 2C) due to the similar expression levels of MDM2 protein between these two cell lines (Figure 2B). These results confirm the earlier reports [35, 36] that PPP treatment induces IGF-1R degradation through MDM2-medicated ubiquitination in a p53-independent manner.
MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of IGF-1R with PPP treatment leads to the activation of ERK pathway , resulting in the resistance of Ewing’s sarcoma to the treatment of the anti-IGF-1R antibody figitumuab . To explore this mechanism in colorectal carcinoma, we treated SW948 and CACO-2 cell lines with PPP in a dose-dependent manner and found that PPP treatment increased the levels of p-ERK in the TP53 mutated CACO-2 but not in the TP53 wild-type SW948 cells (Figure 2D). Taken together, the results suggest that PPP treatment bocks the phosphorylation of IGF-1R and inhibits the downstream ERK pathway in TP53 wild type colorectal carcinoma cells. In contrast, TP53 mutated carcinoma cells are resistant to the PPP treatment in part due to its failure of inhibition of the intracellular ERK pathway.
PPP treatment induces apoptosis in TP53wild-type but not mutated carcinoma cells
Unphosphorylated BAD interacts with the BCL2 family of proteins and releases their inhibition of the mitochondrial membrane potential , leading to the mitochondrial release of apoptosis factors and resulting in caspase-9 activation and initiation of apoptosis through cleavage of the downstream effectors caspase-3, DFF45, and PARP . In addition, the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase/direct inhibitor of apoptosis binding protein with low pI (SMAC/DIABLO) interacts with THE X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), which releases XIAP from binding to caspase-3 and allows caspase-9 cleavage of caspase-3 [40, 41]. To examine this mitochondrial pathway in PPP-induced apoptosis, we showed that the treatment of PPP led to the cleavage of XIAP (Figure 4A) and caspase-9, caspase-3, PARP, and DFF45 in the TP53 wild-type HCT-8 but not the mutated CACO-2 cells (Figure 4B). Collectively, the PPP resistance is in part due to the inhibition of BAD-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in TP53 mutated colorectal carcinoma cells.
PPP treatment inhibits TP53wild type but not mutated colorectal carcinoma xenografts
Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States ; thus, there is an urgent need for the development of novel and effective treatment of this devastating human disease. Recent studies have provided several lines of evidence indicating that targeting of IGF-1R may as serve as the basis for clinical treatment of colorectal carcinoma. High concentrations of serum IGF-I/IGF-II are associated with increased risk for developing colorectal carcinoma [7–9] and the IGF-II gene is the single most overexpressed gene in colorectal carcinomas . Furthermore, colorectal carcinomas express high levels of IGF-I/IGF-II [11–13], IGF-1R mRNA [14, 15], and IGF-1R protein, as shown in this study. The higher expression levels of IGF-1R are associated with a higher malignant pathologic grade and late stage of colorectal carcinomas .
Preclinical studies have shown that the GEO colorectal carcinoma cell line and xenografts respond to the treatment of a dual IGF-1R/insulin receptor kinase inhibitor, PQIP . However, examination of a large panel of colorectal carcinoma cell lines has suggested that the majority of the cell lines are resistant to this dual inhibitor . The combined treatment of the IGF-1R kinase inhibitor, NVP-AFW541 or PQIP with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib or tarceva triggers apoptosis and inhibits growth of colorectal carcinoma cell lines [47, 48]. A phase II trial, however, has concluded that the IGF-1R neutralizing antibody IMC-A12, alone or in combination with the EGFR antibody cetuximab, is insufficient for the treatment of colorectal carcinomas . Currently, clinical trials of IGF-1R antibodies and kinase inhibitors are ongoing in treating various human cancers. These trails may benefit from studies of the mechanisms in drug resistance and identification of biomarkers that can predict cancer responsiveness to IGF-1R targeted therapies.
After examining a panel of colorectal carcinoma cell lines and xenografts, we have found that the cell lines respond differently to the treatment of PPP, an IGF-1R inhibitor . Some of the cell lines are sensitive whereas other cell lines are resistant to PPP treatment. In the sensitive lines HCT-8 and SW948, PPP treatment blocks IGF-1R phosphorylation and inhibits its downstream AKT and ERK pathway, and suppresses carcinoma cell growth and xenograft progression. In addition, PPP treatment blocks BAD phosphorylation and activates BAD-mediated apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. These findings are consistent with other reports that PPP treatment triggers apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells  and suppresses the progression of multiple myeloma and glioblastoma xenografts [28–30]. Phase I/II trails of PPP are currently in place for treating patients with glioblastoma, hematological malignancies, and non-small cell lung carcinoma.
The salient feature of this study is that most colorectal carcinoma cell lines are resistant to the treatment of PPP. PPP treatment does block IGF-1R phosphorylation but fails to inhibit the downstream AKT and ERK pathway or induce BAD-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis. These findings are consistent with the clinical trials of IGF-1R targeted agents that have not shown much clinical activity against human cancers [1, 16]. Our data suggest that the lack of therapeutic effect is due to the association of PPP resistance with TP53 mutations in colorectal carcinomas. The p53 tumor suppressor regulates apoptosis in many types of cells and mutations of the TP53 gene result in the loss of its function in control of apoptosis in cancer cells . TP53 mutations commonly occur in human colorectal carcinomas . Our study suggests that TP53 gene status can be used as a biomarker to predict the responsiveness of colorectal carcinomas to the treatment of IGF-1R targeted therapies.
The discovery of PPP as an IGF-1R inhibitor  by a research group at the Karolinska Institute has revealed its mechanism of action through inhibition of IGF-1R phosphorylation , which induces G2/M-phase accumulation and apoptosis . This group has further shown that PPP treatment down-regulates the IGF-1R protein through MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation . The MDM2-mediated IGF-1R ubiquitination activates the ERK pathway  and leads to the cancer resistance to PPP . The data presented in this manuscript have confirmed the action of PPP in inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in TP53 wild-type colorectal carcinoma cells. We have also found a correlation between TP53 mutation and PPP resistance in human colorectal carcinoma cells. Both p53 and IGF-1R proteins are the substrates of MDM2 and the presence of MDM2 in both TP53 wild-type and mutated carcinoma cells suggests that PPP-induced ERK activation in TP53 mutated carcinoma cells occurs through a p53-independent manner. The PPP-induced ERK activation contributes in part to the resistance of TP53 mutated colorectal carcinoma to the IGF-1R inhibitor PPP.
The IGF-1R inhibitor, PPP, is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of human cancers. We have found the majority of colorectal carcinoma cell lines are resistant to PPP treatment due to failure of activation of the intracellular AKT and ERK growth pathway and induction of the BAD-induced mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Furthermore, we have found that TP53 mutations are associated with PPP resistance in colorectal carcinoma and indicated that determining the TP53 gene status as wild-type or mutated can be used as a biomarker to predict the responsiveness of colorectal carcinoma in human clinical trials.
This study was supported in part by NIH grant CA129687 to C. Hao. This work was also supported by grants from the NIH NS053454, Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Clinicians and Scientific Program, and the Dana Foundation to C. G. Hadjipanayis.
- Pollak M: The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012, 12 (3): 159-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- LeRoith D: Insulin-like growth factor I receptor signaling–overlapping or redundant pathways?. Endocrinology. 2000, 141 (4): 1287-1288. 10.1210/en.141.4.1287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petley T, Graff K, Jiang W, Yang H, Florini J: Variation among cell types in the signaling pathways by which IGF-I stimulates specific cellular responses. Horm Metab Res. 1999, 31 (2–3): 70-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zha J, Harada H, Yang E, Jockel J, Korsmeyer SJ: Serine phosphorylation of death agonist BAD in response to survival factor results in binding to 14-3-3 not BCL-X(L). Cell. 1996, 87 (4): 619-628. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81382-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Remacle-Bonnet MM, Garrouste FL, Heller S, Andre F, Marvaldi JL, Pommier GJ: Insulin-like growth factor-I protects colon cancer cells from death factor-induced apoptosis by potentiating tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappaB signaling pathways. Cancer Res. 2000, 60 (7): 2007-2017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samani AA, Yakar S, LeRoith D, Brodt P: The role of the IGF system in cancer growth and metastasis: overview and recent insights. Endocr Rev. 2007, 28 (1): 20-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Probst-Hensch NM, Yuan JM, Stanczyk FZ, Gao YT, Ross RK, Yu MC: IGF-1, IGF-2 and IGFBP-3 in prediagnostic serum: association with colorectal cancer in a cohort of Chinese men in Shanghai. Br J Cancer. 2001, 85 (11): 1695-1699. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2172.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Palmqvist R, Hallmans G, Rinaldi S, Biessy C, Stenling R, Riboli E, Kaaks R: Plasma insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective study in northern Sweden. Gut. 2002, 50 (5): 642-646. 10.1136/gut.50.5.642.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, Chan JM, Tao Y, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ: Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91 (7): 620-625. 10.1093/jnci/91.7.620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaaks R, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, Lukanova A, Biessy C, Dechaud H, Rinaldi S, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Shore RE, Riboli E: Serum C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-binding proteins, and colorectal cancer risk in women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92 (19): 1592-1600. 10.1093/jnci/92.19.1592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tricoli JV, Rall LB, Karakousis CP, Herrera L, Petrelli NJ, Bell GI, Shows TB: Enhanced levels of insulin-like growth factor messenger RNA in human colon carcinomas and liposarcomas. Cancer Res. 1986, 46 (12 Pt 1): 6169-6173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert S, Vivario J, Boniver J, Gol-Winkler R: Abnormal expression and structural modification of the insulin-like growth-factor-II gene in human colorectal tumors. Int J Cancer. 1990, 46 (3): 405-410. 10.1002/ijc.2910460313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li SR, Ng CF, Banerjea A, Ahmed S, Hands R, Powar M, Ogunkolade W, Dorudi S, Bustin SA: Differential expression patterns of the insulin-like growth factor 2 gene in human colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2004, 25 (1–2): 62-68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freier S, Weiss O, Eran M, Flyvbjerg A, Dahan R, Nephesh I, Safra T, Shiloni E, Raz I: Expression of the insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in adenocarcinoma of the colon. Gut. 1999, 44 (5): 704-708. 10.1136/gut.44.5.704.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Weber MM, Fottner C, Liu SB, Jung MC, Engelhardt D, Baretton GB: Overexpression of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor in human colon carcinomas. Cancer. 2002, 95 (10): 2086-2095. 10.1002/cncr.10945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcaro A: Targeting the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in human cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2013, 4: 30-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hewish M, Chau I, Cunningham D: Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor targeted therapeutics: novel compounds and novel treatment strategies for cancer medicine. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2009, 4 (1): 54-72. 10.2174/157489209787002515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- King ER, Wong KK: Insulin-like growth factor: current concepts and new developments in cancer therapy. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2012, 7 (1): 14-30. 10.2174/157489212798357930.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Olmos D, Basu B, de Bono JS: Targeting insulin-like growth factor signaling: rational combination strategies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010, 9 (9): 2447-2449. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gualberto A, Pollak M: Emerging role of insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibitors in oncology: early clinical trial results and future directions. Oncogene. 2009, 28 (34): 3009-3021. 10.1038/onc.2009.172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reidy DL, Vakiani E, Fakih MG, Saif MW, Hecht JR, Goodman-Davis N, Hollywood E, Shia J, Schwartz J, Chandrawansa K, et al: Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (27): 4240-4246. 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4154.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Favelyukis S, Till JH, Hubbard SR, Miller WT: Structure and autoregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor kinase. Nat Struct Biol. 2001, 8 (12): 1058-1063. 10.1038/nsb721.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pautsch A, Zoephel A, Ahorn H, Spevak W, Hauptmann R, Nar H: Crystal structure of bisphosphorylated IGF-1 receptor kinase: insight into domain movements upon kinase activation. Structure. 2001, 9 (10): 955-965. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00655-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, Poulaki V, Shringarpure R, Akiyama M, Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Joseph M, Libermann TA, et al: Inhibition of the insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 tyrosine kinase activity as a therapeutic strategy for multiple myeloma, other hematologic malignancies, and solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5 (3): 221-230. 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00050-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Girnita A, Girnita L, del Prete F, Bartolazzi A, Larsson O, Axelson M: Cyclolignans as inhibitors of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and malignant cell growth. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (1): 236-242. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasilcanu D, Girnita A, Girnita L, Vasilcanu R, Axelson M, Larsson O: The cyclolignan PPP induces activation loop-specific inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. Link to the phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase/Akt apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (47): 7854-7862. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stromberg T, Ekman S, Girnita L, Dimberg LY, Larsson O, Axelson M, Lennartsson J, Hellman U, Carlson K, Osterborg A, et al: IGF-1 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition by the cyclolignan PPP induces G2/M-phase accumulation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2006, 107 (2): 669-678. 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menu E, Jernberg-Wiklund H, De Raeve H, De Leenheer E, Coulton L, Gallagher O, Van Valckenborgh E, Larsson O, Axelson M, Nilsson K, et al: Targeting the IGF-1R using picropodophyllin in the therapeutical 5T2MM mouse model of multiple myeloma: beneficial effects on tumor growth, angiogenesis, bone disease and survival. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121 (8): 1857-1861. 10.1002/ijc.22845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menu E, Jernberg-Wiklund H, Stromberg T, De Raeve H, Girnita L, Larsson O, Axelson M, Asosingh K, Nilsson K, Van Camp B, et al: Inhibiting the IGF-1 receptor tyrosine kinase with the cyclolignan PPP: an in vitro and in vivo study in the 5T33MM mouse model. Blood. 2006, 107 (2): 655-660. 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yin S, Girnita A, Stromberg T, Khan Z, Andersson S, Zheng H, Ericsson C, Axelson M, Nister M, Larsson O, et al: Targeting the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor by picropodophyllin as a treatment option for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010, 12 (1): 19-27. 10.1093/neuonc/nop008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muzny DM, Bainbridge MN, Chang K, et al: Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012, 487 (7407): 330-337. 10.1038/nature11252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bellail AC, Olson JJ, Yang X, Chen ZJ, Hao C: A20 ubiquitin ligase-mediated polyubiquitination of RIP1 inhibits caspase-8 cleavage and TRAIL-induced apoptosis in glioblastoma. Cancer Discov. 2012, 2 (2): 140-155. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0172.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Bodmer WF: Analysis of P53 mutations and their expression in 56 colorectal cancer cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (4): 976-981. 10.1073/pnas.0510146103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee W, Belkhiri A, Lockhart AC, Merchant N, Glaeser H, Harris EI, Washington MK, Brunt EM, Zaika A, Kim RB, et al: Overexpression of OATP1B3 confers apoptotic resistance in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (24): 10315-10323. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1984.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vasilcanu R, Vasilcanu D, Rosengren L, Natalishvili N, Sehat B, Yin S, Girnita A, Axelson M, Girnita L, Larsson O: Picropodophyllin induces downregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor: potential mechanistic involvement of Mdm2 and beta-arrestin1. Oncogene. 2008, 27 (11): 1629-1638. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Girnita L, Girnita A, Larsson O: Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (14): 8247-8252. 10.1073/pnas.1431613100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vasilcanu R, Vasilcanu D, Sehat B, Yin S, Girnita A, Axelson M, Girnita L: Insulin-like growth factor type-I receptor-dependent phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 but not Akt (protein kinase B) can be induced by picropodophyllin. Mol Pharmacol. 2008, 73 (3): 930-939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng H, Shen H, Oprea I, Worrall C, Stefanescu R, Girnita A, Girnita L: beta-arrestin-biased agonism as the central mechanism of action for insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor-targeting antibodies in Ewing’s sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109 (50): 20620-20625. 10.1073/pnas.1216348110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bellail AC, Tse MC, Song JH, Phuphanich S, Olson JJ, Sun SY, Hao C: DR5-mediated DISC controls caspase-8 cleavage and initiation of apoptosis in human glioblastomas. J Cell Mol Med. 2010, 14 (6A): 1303-1317. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00777.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du C, Fang M, Li Y, Li L, Wang X: Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell. 2000, 102 (1): 33-42. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00008-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Silke J, Connolly LM, Reid GE, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ, Vaux DL: Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell. 2000, 102 (1): 43-53. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00009-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012, 62 (1): 10-29. 10.3322/caac.20138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu VE, Kern SE, Hruban RH, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW: Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science. 1997, 276 (5316): 1268-1272. 10.1126/science.276.5316.1268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hakam A, Yeatman TJ, Lu L, Mora L, Marcet G, Nicosia SV, Karl RC, Coppola D: Expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in human colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 1999, 30 (10): 1128-1133. 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90027-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ji QS, Mulvihill MJ, Rosenfeld-Franklin M, Cooke A, Feng L, Mak G, O’Connor M, Yao Y, Pirritt C, Buck E, et al: A novel, potent, and selective insulin-like growth factor-I receptor kinase inhibitor blocks insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling in vitro and inhibits insulin-like growth factor-I receptor dependent tumor growth in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6 (8): 2158-2167. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flanigan SA, Pitts TM, Eckhardt SG, Tentler JJ, Tan AC, Thorburn A, Leong S: The insulin-like growth factor I receptor/insulin receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PQIP exhibits enhanced antitumor effects in combination with chemotherapy against colorectal cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16 (22): 5436-5446. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2054.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaulfuss S, Burfeind P, Gaedcke J, Scharf JG: Dual silencing of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer cells is associated with decreased proliferation and enhanced apoptosis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009, 8 (4): 821-833. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu YP, Patil SB, Panasiewicz M, Li W, Hauser J, Humphrey LE, Brattain MG: Heterogeneity of receptor function in colon carcinoma cells determined by cross-talk between type I insulin-like growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (19): 8004-8013. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fridman JS, Lowe SW: Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (56): 9030-9040. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/521/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.