- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Low expression of N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with a poor prognosis
© Cao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 10 February 2013
- Accepted: 21 June 2013
- Published: 24 June 2013
It is currently unclear whether a correlation exists between N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) expression and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study was to examine the underlying clinical significance of NDRG2 expression in ESCC patients and to investigate the effects of NDRG2 up-regulation on ESCC cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the level of NDRG2 expressions in ESCC tissue, which was then compared to specific clinicopathological features in the patient and tissue specimens. Factors associated with patient survival were analysed. Moreover, the effects of up-regulating NDRG2 expression on the growth of an ESCC cell line were examined by MTT, colony formation, DNA replication activity and nude mouse model assays.
Notably low expression of NDRG2 in ESCC patients was inversely associated with clinical stage, NM classification, histological differentiation and patients’ vital status (all P < 0.05). ESCC patients expressing high levels of NDRG2 exhibited a substantially higher 5-year overall survival rate than NDRG2-negative patients. Furthermore, NDRG2 over-expression reduced the proliferation, colony formation and DNA replication activity in ESCC cells, as well as inhibiting the growth of ESCC cells in vivo.
The present experiments demonstrated that NDRG2 may be a diagnostic and prognostic marker in patients with ESCC, and up-regulation of NDRG2 might act as a promising therapeutic strategy for aggressive ESCC.
- Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Oesophageal carcinoma is regarded as the eighth most common malignant cancer and sixth most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide . Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common pathological type in developing nations, particularly in China [2–4]. It has been reported that there are 167,200 cases of oesophageal cancer in China each year, out of a global total of approximately 310,400 cases . Despite improvements in its detection, surgical resection, and adjuvant therapy, the 5-year overall survival rate for oesophageal cancer is approximately 15-24% . Current chemo/radiotherapy conditions act sub-lethally, but they cannot effectively suppress the proliferation of ESCC cells. Thus, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the high rate of proliferation and significant invasion of ESCC cells will allow for the development of an adjuvant therapy to improve current treatment options.
NDRG2, a member of the N-myc downstream-regulated gene family, belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. It was first cloned at our university from a normal human brain cDNA library by subtractive hybridization (GenBank accession no. AF159092) and is regarded as a tumor suppressor gene that is transcriptionally repressed by c-Myc [7–9]. Accumulated evidence indicates that NDRG2 is down-regulated or undetectable in many human cancers [10, 11]. Recently, it has been shown that breast cancer cells have low or undetectable NDRG2 expression, compared with high levels in normal tissues . Further studies have found that NDRG2 is able to inhibit proliferation and enhance apoptosis in many malignant tumors . In addition, NDRG2 could inhibit breast cancer angiogenesis by up-regulating p53 and down-regulating of VEGF . These findings suggest that the expression of NDRG2 is inversely related to cell proliferation, especially in terms of cancer cell proliferation. However, the effects of NDRG2 expression in ESCC remain unclear.
The objective of this study was to investigate NDRG2 expression and its clinical significance in ESCC and to further explore the effects of NDRG2 up-regulation on ESCC cell growth. In this study, western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry methods were used to examine NDRG2 expression. The correlation of NDRG2 expression with clinicopathological features specific to ESCCs was also assessed. Furthermore, using an adenovirus NDRG2 expression system, we verified the effects of Ad-NDRG2 on proliferation, clone formation number, DNA replication activity of Eca-109 cells, and the growth of tumors in a nude mouse model.
Patient information and tissue specimens
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University, and all patients agreed to participate in this study. Fresh oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma specimens were collected from 143 patients at the Xijing Hospital and Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China) from 2003 to 2005. ESCC tissues were obtained from resected tumors and confirmed by pathological review. ESCC specimens were staged in accordance with the American Joint Cancer Committee/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) classification guidelines. The grading and histopathology subtyping of ESCC specimens were based on WHO criteria.
Immunohistochemical staining was performed to assess NDRG2, cyclinD1 and Ki67 protein expression, as described previously . For immunohistochemistry, formalin-fixed tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin, and serial 4 μm sections were obtained using a Leica microtome. For staining, tumor sections were deparaffinised in toluene, rehydrated in an alcohol gradient, and permeabilised in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Sections were then quenched with 3% H2O2 for 5 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity and washed in PBS. Sections were incubated overnight with different antibodies, followed by NDRG2, cyclinD1 or Ki67 antibodies incubation with a biotinylated goat anti-rat or anti-rabbit IgG antibody for 15 min. After washing, sections were incubated with streptavidin peroxidase, lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, and observed under a photomicroscope.
Fresh oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma specimens were collected from 143 patients at the Xijing Hospital and Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China) from 2003 to 2005. NDRG2 expression was detected in all specimens. Tissue specimens were examined separately by 2 pathologists under double-blinded conditions. The molecular expression was scored as positive if >10% of cells had moderate-to-strong staining. Expression was scored as negative if either cytoplasmic or membranous staining were noted in < 10% of cells or if neither cytoplasmic nor membranous staining were observed .
Cell lines and reagents
Normal human oesophageal epithelial cell line HEEC and five ESCC cell lines (EC8712, KYSE30, Eca-109, KYSE70 and KYSE150) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection(ATCC, USA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies, USA), 100 units/ml penicillin G sodium (Sigma, USA), and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulphate (Sigma, USA). Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. A mouse anti-human NDRG2 monoclonal antibody (1:1000 dilution) was purchased from Abcam (UK). A rabbit anti-human β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:3000 dilution) was purchased from Biomics Corporation (China). MTT and western blot kits were from Sigma.
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and permeabilised with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After washing 3 times with PBS, cells were incubated with 50 μl of NDRG2 primary antibody (1:200) at 4°C overnight. Then, the cells were incubated with CY3 (1:400) at room temperature for 2 h before applying the mounting medium (containing DAPI (Sigma; 1:100) for nuclear counterstaining). Cells were washed three times with PBS before observation. The results were analysed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus).
A multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 40 was determined experimentally for Eca-109 cells. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and grown to approximately 80% confluence. After removing the medium, adenovirus-expressing NDRG2 (Ad-NDRG2) or the negative control gene LacZ (Ad-LacZ) was added in serum-free 1640 medium, incubated for 2 h, replaced with fresh 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated for 48 h.
For whole-cell extracts, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and collected by scraping. Cell pellets were homogenised in extraction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 100 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mg/ml aprotinin, 1% NP-40, and 0.5% sodium orthovanadate), incubated at 4°C for 20 min and then centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm. Protein levels in the extracts were quantified using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay. For western blots, 80 μg of whole-cell extract was resolved on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 μm, Millipore, USA) in 25 mM Tris-base, 190 mM glycine, and 20% methanol using a semi-dry blotter. Membranes were blocked with 5% fat-free milk and 0.1% Tween-20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). Primary antibodies were used at the concentration recommended by the suppliers. Detection of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies was performed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse/anti-rabbit immunoglobulins, respectively, and an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell growth following infection was evaluated by an MTT assay. Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate (1 × 103 cells/well) and incubated for different time periods. At different time points post-infection, the cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml MTT (Sigma). Four hours post-infection, the medium was replaced with 150 μl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma) and vortexed for 10 min. Absorbance (A) was then recorded at 570 nm using an Easy Reader 340 AT plate reader (SLT-Labinstruments, Salzburg, Austria). Relative optical density (OD) values were calculated as percentages of the control. All experiments were performed three times independently.
Plate colony formation assay
For colony formation assays, 1 × 103 cells infected with different adenovirus constructs were seeded into 60 mm dishes with 5 ml of 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. After 10 days, the resulting colonies were rinsed with PBS, fixed with methanol at -4°C for 5 min, and stained with Giemsa (Sigma) for 20 minutes. Counting was performed only on clearly visible colonies (diameter > 50 μm).
DNA replication activity assay
DNA replication activity was examined using BrdU (5-Bromo-2-deoxyUridine). Cells grown on coverslips (Fisher) were infected with Ad-LacZ and Ad-NDRG2. Two days after infection, the cells were incubated with BrdU for 1 h and stained with an anti-BrdU antibody (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were then cultured in the mounting medium (containing DAPI (Sigma, 1:100) for nuclear counterstaining). Cells were washed three times with PBS before observation. The results were analysed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus).
Xenograft study in nude mice
For inoculation into nude mice, Eca-109 cells were washed with PBS, digested with trypsin, and resuszpended in serum-free 1640 medium. After centrifugation (800 rpm), cell pellets were suspended in 1640 medium. The cell suspension (5 × 106 cells in a volume of 100 μl PBS) was injected subcutaneously into the hind legs of 4-week-old female BALB/C athymic (nu/nu) mice (SLAC Laboratory Animal Company, Shanghai, China) . When tumors reached a volume of 200 mm3, the mice were arbitrarily assigned to different groups (n = 6 each) to receive intratumoural injections of 109 PFU Ad-NDRG2, Ad-LacZ, or PBS. Intratumoural injections were repeated every 3 days for a total of 24 days. Tumors were measured (perpendicular diameters) every day and their volumes calculated. On day 24, the mice were sacrificed, and their tumors removed for analysis. Tumor volumes were calculated based on calliper measurements of the length and width of the lesions using the following formula: 0.5 × length × width2. The growth curve was then derived from these data.
All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the Detailed Rules for the Administration of Animal Experiments for Medical Research Purposes issued by the Ministry of Health of China and received ethical approval by the Animal Experiment Administration Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, P. R. China). All efforts were made to minimise the animals’ suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.
Experiments in vitro were performed 3 times, and each experiment was performed in triplicate. Data from all quantitative assays are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analysed statistically using a one-way ANOVA and the independent-samples t-test. In the in vivo study, associations between NDRG2 expression and categorical variables were analysed by using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Correlations between NDRG2 expression and categorical variables were analysed by using the Spearman correlation test. Survival curves for both NDRG2-high and NDRG2-low expression patients were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and statistical differences were compared using a log-rank test. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Association between decreased expression of NDRG2 and progression of ESCC
To further examine whether expression of the NDRG2 protein is linked to the clinical progression of ESCC, the following samples were subjected to IHC staining with a human NDRG2 antibody: 143 paraffin-embedded, archived ESCC tissue samples, including 5 cases of stage I, 64 cases of stage IIA, 23 cases of stage IIB, 38 cases of stage III and 13 cases of stage IV tumors. The mean age of the 143 ESCC patients was 62 years (range 38 to 86 years), and follow-up data were available for all patients.
Clinicopathological characteristics of patient samples and expression of NDRG2 in ESCC 143
Number of cases (%)
Number of cases (%)
Expression of NDRG2
Surge + CT/RT/CRT
Correlation of NDRG2 expression with clinical histopathological characteristics in 143 ESCC specimens
Spearman correlation analysis between NDRG2 expression and clinical pathologic factors
Correlation coefficient (r s )
Association between expression of NDRG2 and overall survival of ESCC patients
Up-regulation of NDRG2 expression by Ad-NDRG2 in Eca-109 cells
Inhibitive effects of up-regulating NDRG2 on the growth of Eca-109 cells
Suppression of tumor growth in a nude mouse model by intratumoural Ad-NDRG2 injection
Although surgical resection and adjuvant therapy are commonly used in oesophageal carcinoma patients, the overall survival rate of oesophageal cancer remains very low. The development of biological therapies for oesophageal carcinoma is therefore urgently required. Earlier studies have shown that NDRG2, a new tumour suppressor gene, is lowly expressed and correlates with the progression of breast cancer . However, the correlation of NDRG2 with ESCC and the effect of NDRG2 on ESCC cell growth are currently unclear. In this study, we analysed the correlation of NDRG2 expression with clinical stage, TNM clinical classification, histological differentiation and survival time in the ESCC patients. Moreover, we used an adenovirus-mediated gene expression technology to up-regulate NDRG2 in the ESCC cell line, Eca-109, to directly investigate the effect of NDRG2 on cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
Members of the human NDRG family, comprising NDRG1, NDRG2, NDRG3 and NDRG4, share 57%-65% amino acid identity . Although we do not yet fully understand the roles of the NDRG family members, it is possible that these proteins have a crucial function in tumour progression and differentiation. Previous studies have shown that NDRG2 was highly expressed in adult brain and skeletal muscle and almost undetectable in some human cancer lines [19–21], suggesting that it may play important functions in different tissues. It was reported that the expression level of NDRG2 mRNA was very high in brain, salivary gland, skeletal muscle and mammary gland; low in bone marrow, testis, peripheral blood and placenta; and not detectable in leukocytes, colon and some tumour cell lines [22–24]. Recent reports have shown that NDRG2 was differentially expressed in tumour and normal tissues, and NDRG2 expression was consistently down-regulated in grade Ш meningioma at both the transcriptional and translational levels . Further studies have found that NDRG2 inhibits the proliferation, adhesion and invasion of breast cancer cells [26, 27]. In addition, a previous study reported that NDRG2 could inhibit the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells, specifically via the suppression of CD24 or MMP-9 expression. Tumour angiogenesis in breast cancer was inhibited by overexpression of NDRG2 up-regulating the expression of p53 and VHL and down-regulating the expression of VEGF and HIF-1α . NDRG2 could suppress cell proliferation possibly through the following mechanisms: first, NDRG2 could regulate cyclin D1 and T-cell factor (TCF)/β-catenin activity, both of which are critical signaling pathways in cell growth [29, 30]; second, NDRG2 could suppress nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) activity, suggesting a possible mechanism for NDRG2 to participate in carcinogenesis and progression of human malignancy [31, 32]; third, silencing NDRG2 attenuates p53-mediated apoptosis, and p53 could increase NDRG2 expression to promote tumor cell apoptosis, suggesting that NDRG2 also suppresses tumor cell proliferation through the p53-mediated apoptosis signaling pathway .
The expression and effects of NDRG2 in ESCC are unclear. In this paper, our data suggest that in ESCC tissues, NDRG2 expression decreased progressively through tumour stages I to IV, and NDRG2 expression in the well-differentiated ESCC tissues was significantly high. The data revealed that NDRG2 expression was strongly associated with the TNM clinical stage. Importantly, an overall survival analysis revealed that positive NDRG2 expression was correlated with longer survival time in ESCC patients. Lastly, in vitro and in vivo NDRG2 up-regulation could inhibit Eca-109 cell proliferation, decrease the clone formation number and the DNA replication activity of Eca-109 cells. Moreover, in a nude mouse model of ESCC, Ad-NDRG2 treatment achieved a sustained and significant arrest of tumour growth, and expression of cyclinD1 and Ki67 was lower in tumours excised from mice in the Ad-NDRG2 group.
In summary, our results provide evidence that NDRG2 contributes to the growth of ESCC. NDRG2 expression correlates with ESCC TNM stage, tumour differentiation and overall survival of ESCC patients, and up-regulating NDRG2 expression by adenovirus could inhibit the growth of ESCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our study provides evidence that NDRG2 may play an important role in the development, differentiation, and carcinogenesis of ESCC and could therefore be utilised in diagnosis and as a prognosis indicator in ESCC patients.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81170400).
- Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 2137-2150. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown LM, Hoover R, Silverman D, Baris D, Hayes R, Swanson GM, Schoenberg J, Greenberg R, Liff J, Schwartz A, Dosemeci M, Pottern L, Fraumeni JF: Excess incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer among US Black men: role of social class and other risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 153: 114-122. 10.1093/aje/153.2.114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pickens A, Orringer MB: Geographical distribution and racial disparity in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003, 76: S1367-S1369. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01202-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoner GD, Gupta A: Etiology and chemoprevention of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2001, 22: 1737-1746. 10.1093/carcin/22.11.1737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tong L, Yuan S, Feng F, Zhang H: Role of podoplanin expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Dis Esophagus. 2012, 25: 72-80. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01211.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 2241-2252. 10.1056/NEJMra035010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deng Y, Yao L, Chau L, Ng SS, Peng Y, Liu X, Au WS, Wang J, Li F, Ji S, Han H, Nie X, Li Q, Kung HF, Leung SY, Lin MC: N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation. Int J Cancer. 2003, 106: 342-347. 10.1002/ijc.11228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou RH, Kokame K, Tsukamoto Y, Yutani C, Kato H, Miyata T: Characterization of the human NDRG gene family: a newly identified member, NDRG4, is specifically expressed in brain and heart. Genomics. 2001, 73: 86-97. 10.1006/geno.2000.6496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yao L, Zhang J, Liu X: NDRG2: a Myc-repressed gene involved in cancer and cell stress. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2008, 40: 625-635. 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00434.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Li F, Liu X, Shen L, Liu J, Su J, Zhang W, Deng Y, Wang L, Liu N, Han W, Zhang J, Ji S, Yang A, Han H, Yao L: The repression of human differentiation-related gene NDRG2 expression by Myc via Miz-1-dependent interaction with the NDRG2 core promoter. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 39159-39168. 10.1074/jbc.M605820200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorentzen A, Lewinsky RH, Bornholdt J, Vogel LK, Mitchelmore C: Expression profile of the N-myc Downstream Regulated Gene 2 (NDRG2) in human cancers with focus on breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 14-10.1186/1471-2407-11-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu N, Wang L, Liu X, Yang Q, Zhang J, Zhang W, Wu Y, Shen L, Zhang Y, Yang A, Han H, Zhang J, Yao L: Promoter methylation, mutation, and genomic deletion are involved in the decreased NDRG2 expression levels in several cancer cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 358: 164-169. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Liu W, Yan X, Wang Q, Zhao Q, Xue Y, Ren H, Wu L, Cheng Y, Li S, Miao L, Yao L, Zhang J: Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis by up-regulating NDRG2 expression in breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e32368-10.1371/journal.pone.0032368.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Xue Y, Cui W, Li Y, Zhao Q, Ye W, Zheng J, Cheng Y, Ma Y, Li S, Han T, Miao L, Yao L, Zhang J, Liu W: Ras homolog gene family, member A promotes p53 degradation and vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent angiogenesis through an interaction with murine double minute 2 under hypoxic conditions. Cancer. 2012, 118: 4105-4116. 10.1002/cncr.27393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee DC, Kang YK, Kim WH, Jang YJ, Kim DJ, Park IY, Sohn BH, Sohn HA, Lee HG, Lim JS, Kim JW, Song EY, Kim DM, Lee MN, Oh GT, Kim SJ, Park KC, Yoo HS, Choi JY, Yeom YI: Functional and clinical evidence for NDRG2 as a candidate suppressor of liver cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 4210-4220. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Zhang J, Ma Y, Zheng J, Cheng Y, Xue Y, Liu W: Adenovirus-mediated RhoA shRNA suppresses growth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Med Oncol. 2012, 29: 119-126. 10.1007/s12032-010-9774-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorentzen A, Lewinsky RH, Bornholdt J, Vogel LK, Mitchelmore C: Expression profile of the N-myc Downstream Regulated Gene 2 (NDRG2) in human cancers with focus on breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011, 12: 14-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qu X, Zhai Y, Wei H, Zhang C, Xing G, Yu Y, He F: Characterization and expression of three novel differentiation-related genes belong to the human NDRG gene family. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002, 229: 35-44. 10.1023/A:1017934810825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Belzen N, Dinjens WN, Diesveld MP, Groen NA, van der Made AC, Nozawa Y, Vlietstra R, Trapman J, Bosman FT: A novel gene which is up-regulated during colon epithelial cell differentiation and down-regulated in colorectal neoplasms. Lab Invest. 1997, 77: 85-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piquemal D, Joulia D, Balaguer P, Basset A, Marti J, Commes T: Differential expression of the RTP/Drg1/Ndr1 gene product in proliferating and growth arrested cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1450: 364-373. 10.1016/S0167-4889(99)00056-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boulkroun S, Fay M, Zennaro MC, Escoubet B, Jaisser F, Blot-Chabaud M, Farman N, Courtois-Coutry N: Characterization of rat NDRG2 (N-Myc downstream regulated gene 2), a novel early mineralocorticoid-specific induced gene. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 31506-31515. 10.1074/jbc.M200272200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SC, Kim KD, Kim JT, Kim JW, Yoon DY, Choe YK, Chang YS, Paik SG, Lim JS: Expression and regulation of NDRG2 (N-myc downstream regulated gene 2) during the differentiation of dendritic cells. FEBS Lett. 2003, 553: 413-418. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01030-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu XL, Liu XP, Lin SX, Deng YC, Liu N, Li X, Yao LB: NDRG2 expression and mutation in human liver and pancreatic cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2004, 10: 3518-3521.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nichols NR: Ndrg2, a novel gene regulated by adrenal steroids and antidepressants, is highly expressed in astrocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003, 1007: 349-356. 10.1196/annals.1286.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lusis EA, Watson MA, Chicoine MR, Lyman M, Roerig P, Reifenberger G, Gutmann DH, Perry A: Integrative genomic analysis identifies NDRG2 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene frequently inactivated in clinically aggressive meningioma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 7121-7126. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng J, Liu Q, Li Y, Yang J, Ma J, Yu F, Shi H, Ren Q, Zhang R, Zhang J, Xue Y, Tao Y, Jiang N, Guo H, Yao L, Liu W: NDRG2 expression regulates CD24 and metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010, 11: 1817-1821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SC, Yoon SR, Park YP, Song EY, Kim JW, Kim WH, Yang Y, Lim JS, Lee HG: Expression of NDRG2 is related to tumor progression and survival of gastric cancer patients through Fas-mediated cell death. Exp Mol Med. 2007, 39: 705-714. 10.1038/emm.2007.77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng J, Li Y, Yang J, Liu Q, Shi M, Zhang R, Shi H, Ren Q, Ma J, Guo H, Tao Y, Xue Y, Jiang N, Yao L, Liu W: NDRG2 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma adhesion, migration and invasion by regulating CD24 expression. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 251-259. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-251.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim YJ, Yoon SY, Kim JT, Choi SC, Lim JS, Kim JH, Song EY, Lee HG, Choi I, Kim JW: NDRG2 suppresses cell proliferation through down-regulation of AP-1 activity in human colon carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2009, 124: 7-15. 10.1002/ijc.23945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YJ, Yoon SY, Kim JT, Song EY, Lee HG, Son HJ, Kim SY, Cho D, Choi I, Kim JH, Kim JW: NDRG2 expression decreases with tumor stages and regulates TCF/beta-catenin signaling in human colon carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 598-605. 10.1093/carcin/bgp047.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim A, Kim MJ, Yang Y, Kim JW, Yeom YI, Lim JS: Suppression of NF-kappaB activity by NDRG2 expression attenuates the invasive potential of highly malignant tumor cells. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 927-936. 10.1093/carcin/bgp072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shon SK, Kim A, Kim JY, Kim KI, Yang Y, Lim JS: Bonemorphogenetic protein-4 induced by NDRG2 expression inhibits MMP-9 activity in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009, 385: 198-203. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/305/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.