- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Oncostatin M promotes STAT3 activation, VEGF production, and invasion in osteosarcoma cell lines
© Fossey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 28 October 2010
- Accepted: 11 April 2011
- Published: 11 April 2011
We have previously demonstrated that both canine and human OSA cell lines, as well as 8 fresh canine OSA tumor samples, exhibit constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3, and that this correlates with enhanced expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2). While multiple signal transduction pathways can result in phosphorylation of STAT3, stimulation of the cytokine receptor gp130 through either IL-6 or Oncostatin M (OSM) is the most common mechanism through which STAT3 is activated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of IL-6 and OSM stimulation on both canine and human OSA cell lines to begin to determine the role of these cytokines in the biology of OSA.
RT-PCR and Western blotting were used to interrogate the consequences of OSM and IL-6 stimulation of OSA cell lines. OSA cells were stimulated with OSM and/or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and the effects on MMP2 activity (gel zymography), proliferation (CyQUANT), invasion (Matrigel transwell assay), and VEGF production (Western blotting, ELISA) were assessed. The small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3 was used to investigate the impact of STAT3 inhibition following OSM stimulation of OSA cells.
Our data demonstrate that the OSM receptor (OSMR), but not IL-6 or its receptor, is expressed by all human and canine OSA cell lines and canine OSA tumor samples; additionally, OSM expression was noted in all tumor samples. Treatment of OSA cell lines with OSM induced phosphorylation of STAT3, Src, and JAK2. OSM stimulation also resulted in a dose dependent increase in MMP2 activity and VEGF expression that was markedly reduced following treatment with the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3. Lastly, OSM stimulation of OSA cell lines enhanced invasion through Matrigel, particularly in the presence of rhHGF. In contrast, both OSM and HGF stimulation of OSA cell lines did not alter their proliferative capacity.
These data indicate OSM stimulation of human and canine OSA cells induces STAT3 activation, thereby enhancing the expression/activation of MMP2 and VEGF, ultimately promoting invasive behavior and tumor angiogenesis. As such, OSM and its receptor may represent a novel target for therapeutic intervention in OSA.
- Hepatocyte Growth Factor
- VEGF Expression
- JAK2 Phosphorylation
- Hepatocyte Growth Factor Stimulation
- American Type Cell Culture Collection
Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common malignant bone tumor in humans and dogs, although the incidence of disease in the dog population is approximately ten times higher than in people [1, 2]. OSA in both species shares many features including the presence of microscopic metastatic disease at diagnosis, the development of chemotherapy resistant metastases, and dysregulation of several key cellular proteins including Met, ezrin and STAT3 [2–6]. Despite aggressive treatment including surgery and chemotherapy, little improvement in survival times has been achieved in either dogs or people over the past 15 years even with significant efforts directed at the incorporation of novel therapeutic approaches [7–9]. As such, the identification of key factors that regulate the aggressive biologic behavior of OSA, particularly with respect to metastasis, will be necessary if significant improvements in therapeutic outcome are to occur.
Oncostatin M (OSM) is a member of the IL-6 cytokine family produced by inflammatory cells and some tumor cells including primary human osteoblasts and the human OSA cell line MG-63 [10, 11]. OSM stimulation of cells induces diverse functions across a variety of tissue types and cell lines such as modulation of growth and differentiation, inflammation, remodeling of extracellular matrix, and enhancement of metastatic capacity [11–14], however the exact role that this cytokine plays in bone biology has not yet been clearly defined [10, 15].
OSM binds its receptor, oncostatin M receptor (OSMR), which exists as part of a heterodimer with the gp130 signal transducer, promoting reciprocal phosphorylation and activation of members of the Janus kinase family (JAK). Additionally, evidence suggests that OSM also acts through the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) and gp130  with activation of DNA binding activity of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5B . Indeed, gp130 signaling cytokines such as OSM have been shown to be produced by mouse osteoblasts and osteocytes with differing effects through these receptors on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and activation [18–20]. Involvement of OSMR in bone biology was demonstrated by the osteopetrotic phenotype of OSMR- deficient mice . The gp130 pathway has been shown to have multiple roles in bone growth, resorption, and formation thus making signaling through this pathway an interesting new area of study in bone biology and carcinogenesis .
Following OSM binding to OSMR and gp130, JAK2 is phosphorylated, which in turn phosphorylates STAT3 permitting nuclear translocation and modulation of gene expression [11, 21, 22]. Several transcriptional targets of STAT3 are important contributors to tumor biology and activation of STAT3 by gp130-mediated mechanisms is known to be oncogenic . STAT3 has been implicated as being a central regulator of tumor progression through its transcriptional upregulation of VEGF, Mcl-1, and survivin, among others [24, 25]. Additionally, members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases have been shown to be associated with and be activated through cytokine binding to gp130 in cancer cells [26, 27]. Our previous work demonstrated that inhibition of STAT3 function in OSA cell lines using small molecule inhibitors downregulated MMP2 and VEGF expression and induced apoptosis suggesting that STAT3 activation may be an important regulator of the aggressive biologic behavior of OSA . In support of this notion, a recent study demonstrated that human OSA patients whose tumors express high levels of phospho-STAT3 had a worse prognosis [28, 29]. Lastly, expression profiling of pediatric OSA revealed that tumors with a poorer prognosis were associated with greater expression of genes enhancing cell migration and remodeling, many of which are transcriptionally regulated by STAT3 . As such, the purpose of the following study was to explore the impact of OSM and IL-6 stimulation on OSA cell lines to begin to assess the role of the gp130 signaling pathway in OSA cell biology.
Cell Lines and Reagents
Canine OSA cell lines, OSA 8 and 16 were provided by Dr. Jaime Modiano (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) . The canine D17 OSA cell line and human OSA cell lines U2OS and SJSA were purchased from American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC). Cell line authentication of human OSA cell lines SJSA and U2OS was recently completed by The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Molecular Cytogenetics Shared Resource through karyotype analysis and comparison to that of the cell lines at ATCC. The canine lines and human line SJSA were maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, non-essential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine, and HEPES (4-(2-hydroxethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) at 35°C, supplemented with 5% CO2. The U2OS cell line was cultured in McCoy's medium with 10% FBS and the same supplements as listed for the canine lines. The normal canine osteoblasts were obtained from Cell Applications (San Diego, CA) and maintained in Canine Osteoblast Growth Medium with 10% FBS. Human spleen total RNA was purchased from Ambion Biosystems (Austin, TX). The canine OSA tumor and normal spleen samples were obtained from dogs treated at The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medical Center in compliance with established hospital policies regarding sample collection as part of the Biospecimen Repository. Collection procedures by the Biospecimen Repository are approved by the OSU IACUC (2010A0015, Canine Specimen Collection and Banking). Fresh tissue samples were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine Biospecimen Repository. The tumors were evaluated and confirmed as OSA by board certified veterinary pathologists at The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine.
Primer pairs used for RT-PCR.
Annealing Temp (°C)
Protein lysates were prepared and quantified, separated by SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting was performed as described previously  on 2 × 106 OSA cells after stimulation with either PBS or recombinant human oncostatin M (rhOSM, 50 or 100 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or recombinant canine interleukin-6 (rcIL-6) (30 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 0, 5, 10, or 30 minutes. Additionally, human OSA cell line SJSA was stimulated with either PBS, 50 or 100 ng/mL rhOSM, or 100 ng/mL rhOSM and the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3  at 40 μM for 72 hours prior to collecting cells and preparing protein lysates that were separated by SDS-PAGE. The membranes were then incubated overnight with anti-p-STAT3 (Y705, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-p-JAK2 (Y1007/1008, Millipore, Temecula, CA), anti-VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), or anti-p-Src (Y418, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) after which they were incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase linked secondary antibodies, washed, and exposed to substrate (SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate, Pierce, Rockford, IL). Blots were stripped, washed, and reprobed for β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), total STAT3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), total JAK2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) or total Src (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Images shown are representative of all repeats of the experiments. Experiments were repeated twice.
OSA cells (7 × 106) cells were serum starved for two hours then treated with rhOSM (50 ng/mL) for 0 or 15 minutes. Cells were collected and lysate prepared as described previously . The Rabbit TrueBlot™ kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) was utilized to immunoprecipitate canine gp130 using anti-gp130 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Western blotting using an anti-Src or anti-STAT3 antibody (Cell Signaling Biotechnology, Danvers, MA) was performed after addition of the appropriate secondary antibody. The membrane was stripped and reprobed for gp130 and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
OSA cells (2 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates overnight and incubated with PBS, 50, or 100 ng/mL rhOSM for 72 hours. Each treatment group was performed in four replicate wells. Prior to collection, media was removed and the plates were frozen at -80°C overnight before processing with the CyQUANT® Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to manufacturer's instructions and analyzed as described previously .
Cells were plated as previously described  and treated with PBS, 50, or 100 ng/mL rhOSM or 100 ng/mL rhOSM and the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3 40 μM . Separate experiments were conducted with cells plated in a similar manner and treated with PBS, rhOSM (50 ng/mL), rhHGF (50 ng/mL), or the two together. Media was collected after 72 hours, processed, and gel zymography performed as described previously . Images were scanned and analyzed using Image J.
Canine (OSA8) and human (SJSA) OSA cells were plated in invasion assay experiments as described previously . Briefly, cells were plated in the upper chamber in serum-free media with rhOSM (50 ng/mL) for all treatment groups. The lower chambers contained media with 10% fetal bovine serum alone (C10), C10 with rhOSM (50 ng/mL), C10 with rhHGF (50 ng/mL), or C10 with both cytokines at 50 ng/mL. Cells were incubated overnight to allow invasion through the Matrigel layer. Inserts were processed and cells counted as previously described . Treatments were run in quadruplicate and cells from ten random fields from each replicate were counted.
125,000 canine (OSA8) or human (SJSA) OSA cells were plated in C10 media in a six well plate and cultured overnight. The media was removed and cells incubated for 24 hours in C1 media with PBS, OSM 50 or 100 ng/mL, or OSM 100 ng/mL + LLL3 40 μM. Media was removed and frozen at -80°C. VEGF expression was determined using the DuoSet ELISA Development System for canine or human VEGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to manufacturer's instructions.
In the invasion assays, we computed the average cell count per replicate and analyzed the means using a randomized block ANOVA (blocked on plate). Prior to analysis, the means were square root transformed in order to better satisfy the normality and equal variance assumptions of ANOVA. An overall F test of a difference in means across treatment groups was computed and pairwise comparisons of the groups were performed using Holm's method to control type-I error . All experiments were performed two to three times. Statistical analysis of the VEGF ELISA data was performed using the Student's t-test. P values of less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Oncostatin M Receptor and gp130 are expressed in human and canine OSA cell lines
JAK2/STAT3 and Src phosphorylation is stimulated by Oncostatin M in OSA cell lines
JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation is not stimulated by IL-6 in canine OSA
Src and STAT3 are associated with gp130 in OSA cell lines with or without Oncostatin M stimulation
Oncostatin M stimulation does not alter the proliferation of OSA cell lines
Oncostatin M stimulation of OSA cell lines enhances MMP2 and VEGF expression and tumor cell invasion
To determine whether the effect of OSM on MMP2 expression was biologically relevant with respect to tumor cell invasion, we cultured canine (OSA8) or human (SJSA) OSA cells in inserts containing serum-free media and rhOSM (50 ng/mL) overlying a Matrigel substrate. These inserts were placed in wells containing either media with 10% fetal bovine serum alone (C10), C10 with rhOSM (50 ng/mL), C10 with rhHGF (50 ng/mL), or C10 media with both cytokines together at same concentrations (50 ng/mL). After 18 hours of incubation, OSA cell lines treated with either cytokine alone exhibited significantly enhanced invasion as compared to media alone. (Figure 6b). Furthermore, invasion of OSA cells treated with both rhOSM and rhHGF was significantly greater than that observed with either cytokine/growth factor alone. Upregulation of MMP2 activity was observed following treatment with rhOSM alone, rhHGF alone and both OSM and HGF in combination (Figure 6c). Finally, stimulation of the human OSA cell line SJSA with OSM led to dose dependent increases in VEGF protein expression that was largely abrogated by concurrent treatment with the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3 (Figures 6d and 6e).
The link between inflammation and carcinogenesis is well known; experiments have implicated many components of the inflammatory cascade such as prostaglandin E2 and IL-6 as key players in tumor development, growth, and metastasis [37, 38]. These inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, either generated by the tumor cells themselves in an autocrine manner or derived from inflammatory or stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment, have received much attention as potential targets for therapeutic intervention [37, 39, 40]. Indeed, these cytokines trigger the activation of many signaling pathways known to contribute to tumorigenesis and chemoresistance such as the JAK/STAT and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways . We had previously shown that STAT3 activation was present in a substantial number of OSA cell lines and primary canine OSA tumor samples and that inhibition of STAT3 using either a small molecule inhibitor or siRNA resulted in death of OSA cells in vitro . The purpose of the following study was to identify possible drivers of the observed STAT3 activation.
Our data demonstrate that OSM, a member of the IL-6 subfamily of cytokines, and components of the OSM signaling pathway are expressed in OSA cell lines and tumor samples, and that activation of the JAK/STAT3 pathway with OSM stimulation leads to increased production of MMP2, VEGF, and enhanced tumor cell invasion. These results suggest that this pathway may be important in vivo for OSA cell metastasis by facilitating the process of invasion and angiogenesis. Interestingly, expression of IL-6 and IL-6R was either very low or absent in the OSA cells and the cells did not respond to stimulation with IL-6 indicating that this cytokine is likely not an important contributor to OSA pathobiology.
OSM is known to affect a variety of biological processes including cell growth and differentiation, hematopoiesis, and inflammation . It has also been implicated as having a role in bone remodeling [20, 41] in part through stimulating osteoblast differentiation and activation. OSM can be expressed in the bone marrow compartment  and is secreted from activated lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils [11, 43]. Interestingly, breast cancer cells have been demonstrated to stimulate neutrophils to produce the cytokine  and experiments have shown that OSM is produced by multiple human osteoblast-like cell lines including the OSA cell line MG-63 and mouse osteoblasts and osteocytes [10, 20]. Co-expression of OSM and its receptor was noted in the fresh frozen tumor samples while only OSM receptor was identified in the cell lines. Based on these data, it is possible that the OSM found in the tumor specimens is derived from local inflammatory or stromal cells in the OSA tumor microenvironment independent of or, as demonstrated with the breast cancer cell lines, under the influence of the tumor cells.
OSM activates JAK2 and STAT3 upon binding to its receptor in many cells including murine, rat, and human osteoblastic cells and osteosarcoma cell lines [21, 22]. However, the role of this cytokine pathway in OSA tumor cell survival and metastasis has not been fully explored. Upon stimulation with OSM, we demonstrated marked increases in JAK2, STAT3, and Src phosphorylation in canine and human OSA cell lines. This signaling enhanced the production of VEGF which is consistent with activation of STAT3, as it could be blocked by the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL3 . It has been shown that OSM stimulation enhances VEGF expression in adipocytes  and that OSM stimulates strong phospho-STAT3 (tyrosine 705) in normal and keloid fibroblasts . Given that OSM is present in all canine patient tumor samples, it is plausible to infer that OSM in the tumor microenvironment in vivo likely enhances OSA basal Src and STAT3 activation and JAK2 phosphorylation. Indeed, the enhanced phosphorylation of Src and STAT3 and co-localization of Src and STAT3 with gp130 in the OSA cell lines following OSM stimulation suggest that a similar functional and spacial relationship exists between STAT3 and Src as shown by Schaeffer et al in multiple myeloma cells in which binding of IL-6 to gp130 led to activation of the Src family kinase Hck .
OSM is known to confer multiple, often divergent functions to various cell types including inhibition of melanoma and astroglioma tumor cell growth [43, 46] and stimulation of proliferation of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma cells and fibroblasts . In OSA cells, OSM has been shown to downregulate osteoblast markers and induce glial fibrillary acidic protein , promote an osteocyte-like differentiation , and sensitize rat OSA cells to the antitumor effect of midostaurin . However, our data indicate that treatment of canine and a human OSA cell lines does not impact their proliferation or viability. Other studies have shown that OSM has a role in regulating the MMPs as part of both wound healing and inflammation . Enhanced MMP9 expression has been observed in astroglioma cell lines following OSM exposure  and breast cancer cells treated with OSM demonstrated increased VEGF production associated with detachment and invasion . OSM stimulation has been linked to VEGF upregulation in normal adipocytes, liver, smooth muscle, and cardiac myocytes [44, 48–50]. Lastly, OSM stimulation of astroglioma cells led to increased STAT3-dependent VEGF expression .
We observed increased MMP2 activity and VEGF expression with OSM stimulation of OSA cell lines that was partially abrogated by the small molecule STAT3 inhibitor, LLL3 . Higher levels of VEGF expression in human OSA tumors have been shown to correlate with a significantly worse prognosis and the presence of lung metastasis [52, 53]. Higher VEGF expression also has predictive value for survival of OSA patients . With respect to canine OSA, one study found that pretreatment platelet-corrected serum VEGF levels correlated significantly with DFI in dogs with OSA following amputation and adjuvant chemotherapy . Lastly, higher levels of plasma VEGF were found in more aggressive neoplasms in a survey of spontaneous canine tumors including those of the bone . These data suggest that OSM stimulation of OSA cells may enhance VEGF production, thereby promoting angiogenesis, contributing to the metastatic cascade. Our data showed that OSM stimulation of OSA lines significantly enhanced the invasive behavior of OSA cells and that this was augmented in the presence of HGF. However, we have previously demonstrated that HGF stimulation of OSA cells does not promote STAT3 phosphorylation , and it is thus likely that HGF contributes to the observed invasion through mechanisms other than MMP2 production. As both OSM and HGF are likely to be relatively ubiquitous in the tumor microenvironment, it is possible they may work to promote early invasion and metastasis of OSA cells in vivo.
Early microscopic metastasis is a frequent finding in OSA and the treatment of this disease will depend in part on identifying therapeutic targets to abrogate this process. We have shown in previous work that STAT3 dysregulation is frequently found in canine and human OSA cell lines and canine patient tumor samples. Our data here indicate that JAK2 and STAT3 are activated by the cytokine OSM and that this cytokine is present in canine patient tumor samples. Although OSM has various and at times contradictory functions in many tumor types, in our cell lines OSM enhanced MMP2 and VEGF expression and function in part through STAT3 activation, thereby promoting tumor cell invasion. These results support the notion that OSM may contribute to the invasive and metastatic nature of OSA through activation of STAT3, and as such may represent a viable pathway for therapeutic intervention.
This work was supported by grants from the Morris Animal Foundation, the American Kennel Club, and NIH K01 (1K01RR025393-01). The authors would like to thank Tim Vojt of The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine Biomedical Media Services for his assistance in figure preparation and The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine Comparative Oncology Biospecimen Repository for their assistance in sample acquisition.
- Marina N, Gebhardt M, Teot L, Gorlick R: Biology and therapeutic advances for pediatric osteosarcoma. Oncologist. 2004, 9 (4): 422-441. 10.1634/theoncologist.9-4-422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Withrow SJ, Powers BE, Straw RC, Wilkins RM: Comparative aspects of osteosarcoma. Dog versus man. Clin Orthop. 1991, 270: 159-168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferracini R, Angelini P, Cagliero E, Linari A, Martano M, Wunder J, Buracco P: MET oncogene aberrant expression in canine osteosarcoma. J Orthop Res. 2000, 18 (2): 253-256. 10.1002/jor.1100180213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacEwen EG, Kutzke J, Carew J, Pastor J, Schmidt JA, Tsan R, Thamm DH, Radinsky R: c-Met tyrosine kinase receptor expression and function in human and canine osteosarcoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003, 20 (5): 421-430. 10.1023/A:1025404603315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khanna C, Wan X, Bose S, Cassaday R, Olomu O, Mendoza A, Yeung C, Gorlick R, Hewitt SM, Helman LJ: The membrane-cytoskeleton linker ezrin is necessary for osteosarcoma metastasis. Nat Med. 2004, 10 (2): 182-186. 10.1038/nm982.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fossey SL, Liao AT, McCleese JK, Bear MD, Lin J, Li PK, Kisseberth WC, London CA: Characterization of STAT3 activation and expression in canine and human osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 81-10.1186/1471-2407-9-81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Paoloni M, Davis S, Lana S, Withrow S, Sangiorgi L, Picci P, Hewitt S, Triche T, Meltzer P, Khanna C: Canine tumor cross-species genomics uncovers targets linked to osteosarcoma progression. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 625-10.1186/1471-2164-10-625.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chun R, de Lorimier LP: Update on the biology and management of canine osteosarcoma. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003, 33 (3): 491-516. 10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00021-4. viView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark JC, Dass CR, Choong PF: A review of clinical and molecular prognostic factors in osteosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008, 134 (3): 281-297. 10.1007/s00432-007-0330-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bilbe G, Roberts E, Birch M, Evans DB: PCR phenotyping of cytokines, growth factors and their receptors and bone matrix proteins in human osteoblast-like cell lines. Bone. 1996, 19 (5): 437-445. 10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00254-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka M, Miyajima A: Oncostatin M, a multifunctional cytokine. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003, 149: 39-52. full_text.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brounais B, David E, Chipoy C, Trichet V, Ferre V, Charrier C, Duplomb L, Berreur M, Redini F, Heymann D, et al: Long term oncostatin M treatment induces an osteocyte-like differentiation on osteosarcoma and calvaria cells. Bone. 2009, 44 (5): 830-839. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jorcyk CL, Holzer RG, Ryan RE: Oncostatin M induces cell detachment and enhances the metastatic capacity of T-47D human breast carcinoma cells. Cytokine. 2006, 33 (6): 323-336. 10.1016/j.cyto.2006.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brounais B, Chipoy C, Mori K, Charrier C, Battaglia S, Pilet P, Richards CD, Heymann D, Redini F, Blanchard F: Oncostatin M induces bone loss and sensitizes rat osteosarcoma to the antitumor effect of Midostaurin in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (17): 5400-5409. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bishop KA, Meyer MB, Pike JW: A novel distal enhancer mediates cytokine induction of mouse RANKl gene expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2009, 23 (12): 2095-2110. 10.1210/me.2009-0209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mosley B, De Imus C, Friend D, Boiani N, Thoma B, Park LS, Cosman D: Dual oncostatin M (OSM) receptors. Cloning and characterization of an alternative signaling subunit conferring OSM-specific receptor activation. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (51): 32635-32643. 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuropatwinski KK, De Imus C, Gearing D, Baumann H, Mosley B: Influence of subunit combinations on signaling by receptors for oncostatin M, leukemia inhibitory factor, and interleukin-6. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (24): 15135-15144. 10.1074/jbc.272.24.15135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sims NA: gp130 signaling in bone cell biology: multiple roles revealed by analysis of genetically altered mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 310 (1-2): 30-39. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heymann D, Rousselle AV: gp130 Cytokine family and bone cells. Cytokine. 2000, 12 (10): 1455-1468. 10.1006/cyto.2000.0747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker EC, McGregor NE, Poulton IJ, Solano M, Pompolo S, Fernandes TJ, Constable MJ, Nicholson GC, Zhang JG, Nicola NA, et al: Oncostatin M promotes bone formation independently of resorption when signaling through leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in mice. J Clin Invest. 120 (2): 582-592. 10.1172/JCI40568.Google Scholar
- Chipoy C, Berreur M, Couillaud S, Pradal G, Vallette F, Colombeix C, Redini F, Heymann D, Blanchard F: Downregulation of osteoblast markers and induction of the glial fibrillary acidic protein by oncostatin M in osteosarcoma cells require PKCdelta and STAT3. J Bone Miner Res. 2004, 19 (11): 1850-1861. 10.1359/JBMR.040817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JB, Schindler C, Raz R, Levy DE, Baron R, Horowitz MC: Activation of the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway by oncostatin-M cultured human and mouse osteoblastic cells. Endocrinology. 1996, 137 (4): 1159-1165. 10.1210/en.137.4.1159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silver JS, Hunter CA: gp130 at the nexus of inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2010, 88 (6): 1145-1156. 10.1189/jlb.0410217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Devarajan E, Huang S: STAT3 as a central regulator of tumor metastases. Curr Mol Med. 2009, 9 (5): 626-633. 10.2174/156652409788488720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R: STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2000, 19 (21): 2474-2488. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaeffer M, Schneiderbauer M, Weidler S, Tavares R, Warmuth M, de Vos G, Hallek M: Signaling through a novel domain of gp130 mediates cell proliferation and activation of Hck and Erk kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21 (23): 8068-8081. 10.1128/MCB.21.23.8068-8081.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hallek M, Neumann C, Schaffer M, Danhauser-Riedl S, von Bubnoff N, de Vos G, Druker BJ, Yasukawa K, Griffin JD, Emmerich B: Signal transduction of interleukin-6 involves tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple cytosolic proteins and activation of Src-family kinases Fyn, Hck, and Lyn in multiple myeloma cell lines. Exp Hematol. 1997, 25 (13): 1367-1377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang YC, Zheng LH, Ma BA, Zhou Y, Zhang MH, Zhang DZ, Fan QY: Clinical value of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) gene expression in human osteosarcoma. Acta Histochem. 2010Google Scholar
- Ryu K, Choy E, Yang C, Susa M, Hornicek FJ, Mankin H, Duan Z: Activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) pathway in osteosarcoma cells and overexpression of phosphorylated-Stat3 correlates with poor prognosis. J Orthop Res. 2010, 28 (7): 971-978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mintz MB, Sowers R, Brown KM, Hilmer SC, Mazza B, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Lafleur B, McDonough WS, Henry MM, et al: An expression signature classifies chemotherapy-resistant pediatric osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (5): 1748-1754. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao AT, McCleese J, Kamerling S, Christensen J, London CA: A novel small molecule Met inhibitor, PF2362376, exhibits biological activity against osteosarcoma. Vet Comp Oncol. 2007, 5 (3): 177-196. 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2007.00137.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Statistics. 1979, 6: 65-70.Google Scholar
- Korzus E, Nagase H, Rydell R, Travis J: The mitogen-activated protein kinase and JAK-STAT signaling pathways are required for an oncostatin M-responsive element-mediated activation of matrix metalloproteinase 1 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (2): 1188-1196. 10.1074/jbc.272.2.1188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li WQ, Dehnade F, Zafarullah M: Oncostatin M-induced matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 genes expression in chondrocytes requires Janus kinase/STAT signaling pathway. J Immunol. 2001, 166 (5): 3491-3498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lana SE, Ogilvie GK, Hansen RA, Powers BE, Dernell WS, Withrow SJ: Identification of matrix metalloproteinases in canine neoplastic tissue. Am J Vet Res. 2000, 61 (2): 111-114. 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjornland K, Flatmark K, Pettersen S, Aaasen AO, Fodstad O, Maelandsmo GM: Matrix metalloproteinases participate in osteosarcoma invasion. J Surg Res. 2005, 127 (2): 151-156. 10.1016/j.jss.2004.12.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solinas G, Marchesi F, Garlanda C, Mantovani A, Allavena P: Inflammation-mediated promotion of invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010, 29 (2): 243-248. 10.1007/s10555-010-9227-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danese S, Mantovani A: Inflammatory bowel disease and intestinal cancer: a paradigm of the Yin-Yang interplay between inflammation and cancer. Oncogene. 2010, 29 (23): 3313-3323. 10.1038/onc.2010.109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scotlandi K, Picci P, Kovar H: Targeted therapies in bone sarcomas. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2009, 9 (7): 843-853. 10.2174/156800909789760410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Day K, Gorlick R: Novel therapeutic agents for osteosarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009, 9 (4): 511-523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Hooge AS, van de Loo FA, Bennink MB, de Jong DS, Arntz OJ, Lubberts E, Richards CD, vandDen Berg WB: Adenoviral transfer of murine oncostatin M elicits periosteal bone apposition in knee joints of mice, despite synovial inflammation and up-regulated expression of interleukin-6 and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160 (5): 1733-1743. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61120-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yanai N, Obinata M: Oncostatin m regulates mesenchymal cell differentiation and enhances hematopoietic supportive activity of bone marrow stromal cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001, 37 (10): 698-704. 10.1290/1071-2690(2001)037<0698:OMRMCD>2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Queen MM, Ryan RE, Holzer RG, Keller-Peck CR, Jorcyk CL: Breast cancer cells stimulate neutrophils to produce oncostatin M: potential implications for tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (19): 8896-8904. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1734.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rega G, Kaun C, Demyanets S, Pfaffenberger S, Rychli K, Hohensinner PJ, Kastl SP, Speidl WS, Weiss TW, Breuss JM, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor is induced by the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 and oncostatin m in human adipose tissue in vitro and in murine adipose tissue in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27 (7): 1587-1595. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.143081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim CP, Phan TT, Lim IJ, Cao X: Cytokine profiling and Stat3 phosphorylation in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions between keloid keratinocytes and fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. 2009, 129 (4): 851-861. 10.1038/jid.2008.337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen SH, Gillespie GY, Benveniste EN: Divergent effects of oncostatin M on astroglioma cells: influence on cell proliferation, invasion, and expression of matrix metalloproteinases. Glia. 2006, 53 (2): 191-200. 10.1002/glia.20264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miles SA, Martinez-Maza O, Rezai A, Magpantay L, Kishimoto T, Nakamura S, Radka SF, Linsley PS: Oncostatin M as a potent mitogen for AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma-derived cells. Science. 1992, 255 (5050): 1432-1434. 10.1126/science.1542793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Faffe DS, Flynt L, Mellema M, Whitehead TR, Bourgeois K, Panettieri RA, Silverman ES, Shore SA: Oncostatin M causes VEGF release from human airway smooth muscle: synergy with IL-1beta. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005, 288 (6): L1040-1048. 10.1152/ajplung.00333.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehashi T, Koyama T, Ookawa K, Ohshima N, Miyoshi H: Effects of oncostatin M on secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and reconstruction of liver-like structure by fetal liver cells in monolayer and three-dimensional cultures. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007, 82 (1): 73-79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss TW, Speidl WS, Kaun C, Rega G, Springer C, Macfelda K, Losert UM, Grant SL, Marro ML, Rhodes AD, et al: Glycoprotein 130 ligand oncostatin-M induces expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human adult cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2003, 59 (3): 628-638. 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00463-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Repovic P, Fears CY, Gladson CL, Benveniste EN: Oncostatin-M induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in astroglioma cells. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (50): 8117-8124. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaya M, Wada T, Akatsuka T, Kawaguchi S, Nagoya S, Shindoh M, Higashino F, Mezawa F, Okada F, Ishii S: Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in untreated osteosarcoma is predictive of pulmonary metastasis and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6 (2): 572-577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oda Y, Yamamoto H, Tamiya S, Matsuda S, Tanaka K, Yokoyama R, Iwamoto Y, Tsuneyoshi M: CXCR4 and VEGF expression in the primary site and the metastatic site of human osteosarcoma: analysis within a group of patients, all of whom developed lung metastasis. Mod Pathol. 2006, 19 (5): 738-745. 10.1038/modpathol.3800587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin F, Zheng SE, Shen Z, Tang LN, Chen P, Sun YJ, Zhao H, Yao Y: Relationships between levels of CXCR4 and VEGF and blood-borne metastasis and survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Med Oncol. 2010Google Scholar
- Thamm DH, O'Brien MG, Vail DM: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations and postsurgical outcome in dogs with osteosarcoma. Vet Comp Oncol. 2008, 6 (2): 126-132. 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2007.00153.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wergin MC, Kaser-Hotz B: Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) measured in seventy dogs with spontaneously occurring tumours. In Vivo. 2004, 18 (1): 15-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/125/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.