Skip to main content
Download PDF

Small RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of heparanase abolishes the invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells

BMC Cancer volume 10, Article number: 33 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Heparanase facilitates the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, and is over-expressed in many kinds of malignancies. Our studies indicated that heparanase was frequently expressed in advanced gastric cancers. The aim of this study is to determine whether silencing of heparanase expression can abolish the malignant characteristics of gastric cancer cells.

Methods

Three heparanase-specific small interfering RNA (siRNAs) were designed, synthesized, and transfected into cultured gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901. Heparanase expression was measured by RT-PCR, real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot. Cell proliferation was detected by MTT colorimetry and colony formation assay. The in vitro invasion and metastasis of cancer cells were measured by cell adhesion assay, scratch assay and matrigel invasion assay. The angiogenesis capabilities of cancer cells were measured by tube formation of endothelial cells.

Results

Transfection of siRNA against 1496-1514 bp of encoding regions resulted in reduced expression of heparanase, which started at 24 hrs and lasted for 120 hrs post-transfection. The siRNA-mediated silencing of heparanase suppressed the cellular proliferation of SGC-7901 cells. In addition, the in vitro invasion and metastasis of cancer cells were attenuated after knock-down of heparanase. Moreover, transfection of heparanase-specific siRNA attenuated the in vitro angiogenesis of cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner.

Conclusions

These results demonstrated that gene silencing of heparanase can efficiently abolish the proliferation, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of human gastric cancer cells in vitro, suggesting that heparanase-specific siRNA is of potential values as a novel therapeutic agent for human gastric cancer.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancer types in the world, although its incidence has gradually decreased in recent years in many countries [1]. Invasion and metastasis of cancer cells remains the main cause of gastric cancer-related death [2]. It is well known that the basement membrane (BM) and extracellular matrix (ECM) play a barrier to prevent tumor cells from invasion and metastasis [3]. Specific enzymes produced by cancer cells and activated by certain signals, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), have been reported to degrade BM and ECM, and are associated with progression of gastric cancer [4–7]. A better knowledge of changes in gene expression during invasion and metastasis may lead to improvements in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Heparan sulfate (HS) and heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), the important structural components of ECM and external surface of cell membranes, play a major role in cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions [8]. Previous reports have shown that heparanase (HPA), an endo-h-D-glucuronidase, has the ability to cleave the heparan sulfate chain of HSPGs, and is one of the key enzymes involved in the invasion and metastasis of malignant tumors [9]. Under normal physiological conditions, HPA expression is detectable in endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, cytotrophoblasts, keratinocytes, platelets platelets, neutrophils, and activated T lymphocytes [10]. However, HPA expression is up-regulated in many tumor cells including esophageal carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, melanoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer [11–15]. It has been established that a significant correlation of HPA over-expression is coupled with increased metastatic potential and decreased survival rates of cancer [16]. These studies suggest that HPA is correlative with invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, and served as an important target of cancer therapy.

Previous studies indicate that the expression of HPA was frequently observed in advanced gastric cancers [17, 18]. The frequency was significantly correlated with histopathological parameters reflecting invasive and metastatic potentials and prognosis of gastric cancers [17, 18]. Our studies also demonstrated the over-expression of HPA protein in advanced gastric cancer (data not shown). However, it still remains largely unknown whether inhibiting HPA expression can abolish the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells. Due to the non-specific activities of current HPA inhibitors and the great difficulties in identifying efficient inhibitors [19–22], genetic approaches targeting HPA have been regarded as a promising alternative [23]. RNA interference (RNAi) is a posttranscriptional mechanism of gene silencing through chromatin remodeling, inhibition of protein translation or direct mRNA degradation [24]. Chemically synthetic small interfering RNA (siRNA) is currently being evaluated not only as an extremely powerful instrument for functional genomic analyses, but also as a potentially useful method to develop highly specific gene-silencing therapeutics [25]. In this study, we designed HPA-specific siRNAs and evaluated their gene silencing effects in cultured gastric cancer cells. We demonstrated that silencing of HPA expression attenuated the in vitro invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis capabilities of gastric cancer cells.

Methods

Cell culture

Human gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901 and endothelial cell line HUVEC were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown in RPMI1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies, Inc.), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Heparanase-specific siRNA and transfection

For RNA interference, three 21-nucleotide siRNA duplexes targeting different encoding regions of HPA (GenBank accession No. AF165154) were designed and chemically synthesized (Ribobio Co. Ltd, GuangZhou, China). The secondary structures of target mRNA were predicted by RNAstructure 3.7 software [26]. The nucleotide sequences were as follows: siH1 (1088-1106 bp), 5'-UUAUGUGGCUGGAUAAAUUtt-3' (sense), and 5'-AAUUUAUCCAGCCACAUAAtt-3' (antisense); siH2 (1267-1285 bp), 5'-GUGCAAGGUUCAAAGAGAAtt-3' (sense), and 5'-UUCUCUUUGAACCUUGCACtt-3' (antisense); siH3 (1496-1514 bp), 5'-CUCUAAAGA UGGUGGAUGAtt-3' (sense), and 5'-UCAUCCACCAUCUUUAGAGtt-3' (antisense). The sequences 5'-AGCAUCGUACGUAGGCCAGtt-3' (sense), and 5'-CUGGCCUACGUACGAUG CUtt-3' (antisense) were used as a scrambled siRNA control (mock). The siRNAs were transfected into culture cells with Genesilencer Transfection Reagent (Genlantis, San Diego, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). The reverse transcription reactions were conducted with Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The PCR primers were designed by Premier Primer 5.0 software as the following: for human HPA 5'-GAATGGACGGACTGCTAC-3' and 5'-CCAAAGAATACTTGCC TCA-3' amplifying a 261-bp fragment; for human GAPDH 5'-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATT TG-3' and 5'-AGGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3' amplifying a 258-bp fragment. Real-time PCR with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was performed using ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems). The fluorescent signals were collected during extension phase, Ct values of the sample were calculated, and HPA transcript levels were analyzed by 2-ΔΔCt method.

Western blot

Cellular protein was extracted with 1× cell lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). Protein (50 μg) from each sample was subjected to 4-20% pre-cast polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). For HPA (InSight Company, Rehovot, Israel) and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) detection, the primary antibody dilutions were 1:500 and 1:1000, respectively, followed by 1:3000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit HRP-labeled antibody (Bio-Rad). ECL substrate kit (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) was used for the chemiluminscent detection of signals with autoradiography film (Amersham).

Measurement of cell viability

Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, cell viability was monitored by the 2-(4, 5-dimethyltriazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma) colorimetric assay. Briefly, 20 μl of MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to each well. After 4 hrs of incubation at 37°C, the cell supernatants were discarded, MTT crystals were dissolved with DMSO and the absorbance measured at 570 nm. Percent viability was defined as the relative absorbance of transfected versus untransfected control cells. All experiments were done with 6-8 wells per experiment and repeated at least three times.

Colony formation assay

Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, the cells were seeded at a density of 300/ml on 35-mm dishes. Colonies were allowed to grow for 10-14 days. The medium was discarded and each well was washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) carefully. The cells were fixed in methanol for 15 min, and then stained with crystal violet for 20 min. Finally, positive colony formation (more than 50 cells/colony) was counted. The survival fraction for cells was expressed as the ratio of plating efficiency of transfected cells to that of untransfected control cells.

Cell adhesion assay

Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, 2 × 104 cells were inoculated into each well of 96-well plates that were precoated with 100 μl of 20 μg/ml matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and incubated at 37°C in serum-free complete medium (pH 7.2) for 2 hrs. After incubation, the wells were washed three times with PBS and the remaining cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. The cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and washed three times with PBS to remove free dye. After extraction with 10% acetic acid, absorbance of the samples was measured at 570 nm. 0%, 20%, 50% and 100% of inoculated cells were directly fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde 2 hrs after inoculation.

Scratch migration assay

SGC-7901 cells were transfected in 24-well plate with siRNAs. Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, the cells were scraped with the fine end of 1-ml pipette tips (time 0). Plates were washed twice with PBS to remove detached cells, and incubated with the complete growth medium. Cell migration into the wounded empty space was followed after 24 hrs and photographed.

Matrigel invasion assay

The Boyden chamber technique (transwell analysis) was performed. Briefly, the 8-μm pore size filters were coated with 100 μl of 1 mg/ml matrigel (dissolved in serum-free RPMI1640 medium). 600 μl of RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chambers. Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, homogeneous single cell suspensions (1 × 105 cells/well) were added to the upper chambers and allowed to invade for 24 hrs at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. Cells remaining attached to the upper surface of the filters were carefully removed with cotton swabs. Migrated cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min at room temperature and examined by light microscopy. Quantification of migrated cells was performed according to published criteria [27].

Tube formation assay

Fifty microliters of growth factor-reduced matrigel was polymerized on 96-well plates. HUVECs were serum starved in RPMI1640 medium for 2 hrs. The cells were suspended in RPMI1640 medium preconditioned with siRNA-transfected SGC-7901 cells, added to the matrigel-coated wells at the density of 5 × 104 cells/well, and incubated at 37°C for 18 hrs. Tube formation was visualized using a Leitz inverted microscope equipped with a Sony color digital DXC-S500 camera. Quantification of antiangiogenic activity was calculated by measuring the length of tube walls formed between discrete endothelial cells in each well relative to the control.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise stated, all data were shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was determined by t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by assessment of differences using SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

siRNA suppressed the HPA expression in gastric cancer cells

As shown in Figure 1A, three siRNA duplexes targeting different encoding regions of human HPA mRNA, named as siH1, siH2 and siH3, were designed and synthesized. Their siRNA sequences and the secondary structures of target mRNA were shown in Figure 1B. Under the mediation of Genesilencer, siRNAs were transfected into gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901. The mRNA and protein expression of HPA were examined by RT-PCR, real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot. As shown in Figure 2A, high HPA mRNA and protein levels were detected in the parental cells, and the scrambled siRNA control (mock, 100 nmol/L) did not affect the expression levels of HPA. The siH3 (100 nmol/L) exerted the most efficiency in suppressing the HPA expression, and siH1 (100 nmol/L) inhibited the HPA expression to a lesser extent (Figure 2A). However, transfection of siH2 (100 nmol/L) slightly influenced the expression of HPA in SGC-7901 cells (Figure 2A). In addition, the siH3-induced suppression of HPA expression of SGC-7901 cells started at 24 hrs, and lasted for 120 hrs (Figure 2B). Of note, the HPA mRNA levels, but not the HPA protein levels, were partially restored at 120 hrs post-transfection (Figure 2B). Moreover, transfection of different concentrations (10 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L and 100 nmol/L) of siH3 into SGC-7901 cells for 48 hrs, resulted in decrease of HPA expression in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2C). These results indicated that the siRNAs, siH3 and siH1, were efficient in down-regulating the expression of HPA in gastric cancer cells.

Figure 1
figure1

Design of siRNA targeting different encoding regions of heparanase. (A) Taken the heparanase mRNA (GenBank accession No. AF165154) as a target, three siRNA duplexes were designed and named as siH1, siH2, and siH3. Their corresponding targets located at 1088-1106 bp, 1267-1285 bp, and 1496-1514 bp of the encoding regions of heparanase mRNA. (B) Prediction of the secondary structures of siRNA targets was performed via RNAstructure 3.7 software. The siH1 recognized a region with three loops and two stems, while siH2 recognized a region with one loop and two stems. The target region of siH3 was sequestered intentionally in a stable stem structure. The red line indicated the target region of siRNA.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

siRNA suppressed the heparanase expression in gastric cancer cells. Confluent gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells were seeded into 6-well plates, and transfected with different heparanase-specific siRNAs (siH1, siH2 and siH3) or scrambled siRNA (mock). The untransfected cells served as a control (No). The mRNA and protein expression of heparanase were examined by RT-PCR, real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot. (A) Forty-eight hrs post-transfection, siH3 (100 nmol/L) exerted the most efficiency in suppressing the heparanase expression, and siH1 (100 nmol/L) inhibited the heparanase expression to a lesser extent. However, transfection of siH2 (100 nmol/L) slightly influence the expression of heparanase in SGC-7901 cells. (B) The siH3 (100 nmol/L)-induced suppression of heparanase expression of SGC-7901 cells started at 24 hrs, and lasted for 120 hrs. Of note, the heparanase mRNA levels, but not the heparanase protein levels, were partially restored at 120 hrs post-transfection. (C) Transfection of different concentrations (10 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L and 100 nmol/L) of siH3 into SGC-7901 cells for 48 hrs, resulted in decrease of heparanase expression in a dose-dependent manner. The symbols (* and **) indicates a significant (P < 0.05) and a very significant (P < 0.01) decrease from mock, respectively. Triplicate experiments were performed with essentially identical results.

Full size image

Silencing HPA attenuated the in vitro cell proliferation of gastric cancer cells

Since previous studies indicate that HPA modulates the cell proliferation of cancer cells [28], we first examined the effects of HPA siRNA on cell proliferation of SGC-7901 cells by MTT colorimetric assay. We found that transfection of siH3 for 48 hrs attenuated the cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner, when compared to the parental cells and mock group (Figure 3A). In addition, the colony formation assay further revealed that 48 hrs post-transfection, high concentrations of siH3 (50 nmo/L and 100 nmol/L), but not low concentration of siH3 (10 nmol/L), attenuated the cell proliferation of cultured SGC-7901 cells (Figure 3B). These results indicated that siH3 attenuated the in vitro cell proliferation of gastric cancer cells.

Figure 3
figure3

Silencing heparanase attenuated the in vitro cell proliferation of gastric cancer cells. Confluent SGC-7901 cells were seeded into 96-well plates, and transfected with different concentrations (10 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L, and 100 nmol/L) of siH3 or scrambled siRNA (mock, 100 nmol/L). The untransfected cells served as a control (No). (A) Forty-eight hours post-transfection, MTT colorimetry was performed to assay the cell proliferation. The results indicated that high concentrations of siH3 (50 nmo/L and 100 nmol/L), but not low concentration of siH3 (10 nmol/L) or scrambled siRNA (mock, 100 nmol/L), attenuated the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells, when compared to the parental cells. (B) In colony formation assay, 48 hrs post-transfection, the cells were seeded at a density of 300/ml on 35-mm dishes. Colonies were allowed to grow for 10-14 days. Positive colony formation (more than 50 cells/colony) was counted. The results indicated that high concentrations of siH3 (50 nmo/L and 100 nmol/L), but not low concentration of siH3 (10 nmol/L) or scrambled siRNA (mock, 100 nmol/L), attenuated the cellular colony formation rates of cultured SGC-7901 cells. The symbols (* and **) indicates a significant (P < 0.05) and a very significant (P < 0.01) decrease from mock, respectively. Triplicate experiments were performed with essentially identical results.

Full size image

Silencing HPA abolished adhesion, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells in vitro

Since HPA plays critical roles in invasion and metastasis of cancer cells [9], and three critical steps are involved in metastasis, that is adhesion, migration and invasion [9], we further observed the effects of HPA-specific siH3 on these characteristics of SGC-7901 cells. In the adhesion assay, 48 hrs post-transfection, high concentrations of siH3 (50 nmo/L and 100 nmol/L), but not low concentration of siH3 (10 nmol/L), reduced the ability of SGC-7901 cells in adhesion to the precoated matrigel, when compared to parental cells (Figure 4A). However, the cells transfected with scrambled siRNA control (mock, 100 nmol/L) had similar ability in adhesion as parental cells (Figure 4A). In addition, 48 hrs post-transfection, the cells transfected with siH3 demonstrated an impaired migration capacity in a dose-dependent manner, when compared to the parental cells and mock group as evidenced by scratch migration assay (Figure 4B). Moreover, the transwell analysis indicated that transfection of siH3 for 48 hrs abolished the invasive capabilities of SGC-7901 cells in a dose-dependent manner, when compared to the parental cells and mock group (100 nmol/L) (Figure 4C). These results suggested that HPA-specific siH3 suppressed the adhesion, invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells in vitro.

Figure 4
figure4

Silencing heparanase abolished the adhesion, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells in vitro. Confluent SGC-7901 cells were seeded into 96-well or 24-well plates, and transfected with different concentrations (10 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L, and 100 nmol/L) of siH3 or scrambled siRNA (mock, 100 nmol/L). The untransfected cells served as a control (No). (A) In the adhesion assay, 48 hrs post-transfection, 2 × 104 cells were inoculated into each matrigel-coated well of 96-well plates for 2 hrs, and washed three times with PBS. The results indicated that transfection of high concentrations of siH3 (50 nmo/L and 100 nmol/L), but not low concentration of siH3 (10 nmol/L) or mock, reduced the adhesion of SGC-7901 cells to the matrigel. (B) In scratch migration assay, 48 hrs post-transfection, the cells were scraped with 1-ml pipette tips (time 0). Cell migration into the wounded empty space was followed after 24 hrs and photographed. The results indicated that transfection of siH3 impaired the cellular migration in a dose-dependent manner. (C) In transwell analysis, 48 hrs post-transfection, homogeneous single cell suspensions (1 × 105 cells/well) were added to the upper chambers and allowed to invade for 24 hrs. Migrated cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and examined by light microscopy. The results indicated that transfection of siH3 abolished the invasion of SGC-7901 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The symbols (* and **) indicates a significant (P < 0.05) and a very significant (P < 0.01) decrease from mock, respectively. Triplicate experiments were performed with essentially identical results.

Full size image

Silencing HPA inhibited the in vitro angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells

Since HPA participates in the angiogenesis of tumor [29, 30], we further investigated the effects of HPA-specific siH3 on the in vitro angiogenesis capabilities of SGC-7901 cells. As shown in Figure 5, extensive tube formation of endothelial cells was observed in non-transfection and mock (100 nmol/L) groups. However, when the endothelial cells were treated by the medium preconditioned with siH3-transfected SGC-7901 cells, the tube formation was dose-dependently suppressed (Figure 5). These results indicate that transfection of siH3 remarkably decreased the angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells in vitro.

Figure 5
figure5

Silencing heparanase inhibited the in vitro angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells. Fifty microliters of growth factor-reduced matrigel was polymerized on 96-well plates. HUVECs were serum starved in RPMI1640 medium for 2 hrs, suspended in RPMI1640 medium preconditioned with siH3-transfected SGC-7901 cells, added to the matrigel-coated wells at the density of 5 × 104 cells/well, and incubated at 37°C for 18 hrs. Tube formation was visualized and calculated by measuring the length of tube walls formed between discrete endothelial cells in each well. Extensive tube formation of endothelial cells was observed in non-transfection (No) and scrambled siRNA (mock, 100 nmol/L) groups. However, when the endothelial cells were treated by the medium preconditioned with siH3-transfected SGC-7901 cells, the tube formation was dose-dependently suppressed. The symbols (* and **) indicates a significant (P < 0.05) and a very significant (P < 0.01) decrease from mock, respectively. Triplicate experiments were performed with essentially identical results.

Full size image

Discussion

Degradation of basement membrane (BM) and extracellular matrix (ECM) comprises an initial and essential step for cancer cells to invade surrounding tissue and metastasize to distant organs [31]. Both the BM and ECM contain heparan sulfite (HS) and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) as major structural components, which are substrates for heparanase (HPA) [9]. Human HPA gene is located on chromosome 4q21.3, and its cDNA contains an open reading frame of 1629-bp that encodes for a 61.2 kDa polypeptide of 543 amino acids [32–34]. Preferential expression of HPA mRNA and protein in tumors is evident in tissue specimens derived from oral squamous cell carcinoma [35], hepatocellular carcinoma [36], and carcinomas of prostate [15], bladder [14], and pancreas [37]. It has been reported that HPA correlated with the metastatic potential of mouse B16 melanoma and Eb lymphoma cells [38]. Subcutaneous inoculation of non-metastatic Eb lymphoma cells engineered to over-express HPA resulted in a significant decease in survival time of the mice due to a massive liver infiltration [32]. These findings support the correlation between HPA expression and the metastatic capacity of cancer cells.

Since HPA plays an important role in the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, many studies focus on the development of HPA inhibitors [23]. With the availability of recombinant HPA and the establishment of high-throughput screening methods, a variety of inhibitory molecules have been developed, including neutralizing antibodies, peptides, small molecules, modified non-anticoagulant species of heparin [23], as well as several other polyanionic molecules, such as laminaran sulfate, suramin and PI-88 [20, 39, 40]. These inhibitors that decrease HPA expression in cancer cells significantly reduce their metastatic properties, signifying the importance of HPA in cancer cell spread [20, 23, 39, 40]. However, because of the multiple biologic activities of these compounds, the mechanism of their antitumor activity and its relation to HPA inhibition are not straightforward. Moreover, the pleiotropic interactions of these compounds with the ECM and the cell surface might produce nonspecific and undesirable effects [20, 23, 39, 40]. Thus, novel approaches are needed to inhibit the role of HPA in cancer progression [23].

Recent report indicated that short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting mouse HPA reduced the metastatic potential of B16-BL6 mouse melanoma cells [38]. Mice inoculated with Eb lymphoma cells transfected with anti-HPA ribozyme exhibited a marked decrease in liver metastasis and survived significantly longer [38]. Current selection of efficient siRNAs relies mainly on the analysis of sequence elements that mediate efficient incorporation into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [41, 42]. However, several studies have suggested the importance of target secondary structure and accessibility based on computational modeling of target structure [43–45]. In this study, we designed three siRNAs targeting the HPA, named as siH1, siH2 and siH3, according to the guidelines for siRNA design [46, 47]. It is well established that once siRNAs are transfected into cells, the guide (antisense) strand of siRNA duplex is incorporated into the RISC, which identifies target mRNA that is complementary to the guide stranded [41, 42]. An endoribonuclease then cleaves target mRNA, resulting in knock-down of gene expression [41, 42]. We found that siH3 was most potent in suppressing the HPA expression in gastric cancer cells even through its predicted secondary structure of target mRNA was sequestered intentionally in a stable stem structure. These results were consistent with previous findings that large variation in the efficiency of siRNAs for different sites on the same target is commonly observed [48]. Thus, it is usually recommended to test several siRNAs in order to achieve the most potent one.

The relationship between HPA and cell proliferation is not established yet [49]. In this study, we found that down-regulation of HPA inhibited the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells in vitro. In addition, the biologic and therapeutic relevance of the HPA-silencing approach was validated using the cell adhesion assay, scratch migration assay, and matrigel assay. We found that the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells in vitro were attenuated by HPA-specific siRNA. Apart from its involvement in invasion and metastasis of cancer, HPA is tightly involved in angiogenesis, primarily by means of releasing heparin-binding angiogenic factors sequestered by HS in BM and ECM, such as basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor [29, 30]. A critical early event in the angiogenic process is degradation of the subendothelial BM, followed by endothelial cell migration toward the angiogenic stimulus [29, 30]. By releasing HS-bound angiogenic growth factors from the ECM, active HPA may indirectly facilitate EC migration and proliferation [29, 30]. In this study, we found that the angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells in vitro was suppressed by HPA-specific siRNA. However, we noted that even after knock-down of HPA, the gastric cancer cells still possessed the capabilities of invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. We believe that other factors, such as uPA and MMPs [4–7], also influence these characteristics of gastric cancer, which warrants our further investigation. The data described here indicate the potential application of HPA-specific siRNA in the treatment of gastric cancer. Since previous studies indicate that the intratumoral injection of siRNAs is a feasible and convenient method for preliminary evaluation of siRNA effect in animal models [50], further in vivo study is warranted to better evaluate the efficiency of HPA-specific siRNAs on the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer.

Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated that silencing the expression of human HPA can efficiently inhibit the invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of human gastric cancer cells. It is likely that the inhibition of HPA expression possibly depresses the degrading of ECM and BM, thus inhibiting the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer. Therefore, our study suggests that HPA-specific siRNAs may be of potential values as novel therapeutic agents for human gastric cancer.

References

  1. 1.

    Terry MB, Gaudet MM, Gammon MD: The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002, 12 (2): 111-127. 10.1053/srao.30814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Li C, Oh SJ, Kim S, Hyung WJ, Yan M, Zhu ZG, Noh SH: Risk factors of survival and surgical treatment for advanced gastric cancer with large tumor size. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009, 13 (5): 881-885. 10.1007/s11605-009-0800-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liotta LA, Stetler-Stevenson WG: Tumor invasion and metastasis: an imbalance of positive and negative regulation. Cancer Res. 1991, 51 (18 Suppl): 5054s-5059s.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wu CY, Wu MS, Chiang EP, Chen YJ, Chen CJ, Chi NH, Shih YT, Chen GH, Lin JT: Plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 level is better than serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level to predict gastric cancer evolution. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (7): 2054-2060. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2299.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kubben FJGM, Sier CFM, van Duijn W, Griffioen G, Hanemaaijer R, Velde van de CJH, van Krieken JHJM, Lamers CBHW, Verspaget HW: Matrix metalloproteinase-2 is a consistent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94 (7): 1035-1040. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603041.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Deng H, Guo RF, Li WM, Zhao M, Lu YY: Matrix metalloproteinase 11 depletion inhibits cell proliferation in gastric cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 326 (2): 274-281. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kaneko T, Konno H, Baba M, Tanaka T, Nakamura S: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression correlates with tumor angiogenesis and poor outcome in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94 (1): 43-49. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01350.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vlodavsky I, Ilan N, Naggi A, Casu B: Heparanase: structure, biological functions, and inhibition by heparin-derived mimetics of heparan sulfate. Curr Pharm Des. 2007, 13 (20): 2057-2073. 10.2174/138161207781039742.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nakajima M, Irimura T, Di Ferrante N, Nicolson GL: Metastatic melanoma cell heparanase. Characterization of heparan sulfate degradation fragments produced by B16 melanoma endoglucuronidase. J Biol Chem. 1984, 259 (4): 2283-2290.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nasser NJ: Heparanase involvement in physiology and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008, 65 (11): 1706-1715. 10.1007/s00018-008-7584-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ikeguchi M, Fukuda K, Yamaguchi K, Kondo A, Tsujitani S, Kaibara N: Quantitative analysis of heparanase gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10 (3): 297-304. 10.1245/ASO.2003.05.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim AW, Xu X, Hollinger EF, Gattuso P, Godellas CV, Prinz RA: Human heparanase-1 gene expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2003, 6 (2): 167-172. 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00087-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rivera RS, Nagatsuka H, Siar CH, Gunduz M, Tsujigiwa H, Han PP, Katase N, Tamamura R, Ng KH, Naomoto Y, Nakajima M, Nagai N: Heparanase and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in the progression of oral mucosal melanoma. Oncol Rep. 2008, 19 (3): 657-661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kazu G, Masa O, Sohe K, Mina T, Jian D, Yoji K, Moto N: Heparanase protein and gene expression in bladder cancer. J Urol. 2001, 166 (4): 1286-1290. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65754-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stadlmann S, Moser PL, Pollheimer J, Steiner P, Krugmann J, Dirnhofer S, Mikuz G, Margreiter R, Amberger A: Heparanase-1 gene expression in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic prostatic tissue. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39 (15): 2229-2233. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00457-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vlodavsky I, Ilan N, Nadir Y, Brenner B, Katz BZ, Naggi A, Torri G, Casu B, Sasisekharan R: Heparanase, heparin and the coagulation system in cancer progression. Thromb Res. 2007, 120 (Supplement 2): S112-S120. 10.1016/S0049-3848(07)70139-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang Z, Xu H, Jiang L, Zhou X, Lu C, Zhang X: Positive association of heparanase expression with tumor invasion and lymphatic metastasis in gastric carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2004, 18 (2): 205-211. 10.1038/modpathol.3800282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Takaoka M, Naomoto Y, Ohkawa T, Uetsuka H, Shirakawa Y, Uno F, Fujiwara T, Gunduz M, Nagatsuka H, Nakajima M, Tanaka N, Haisa M: Heparanase expression correlates with invasion and poor prognosis in gastric cancers. Lab Invest. 2003, 83 (5): 613-622.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bar-Ner M, Eldor A, Wasserman L, Matzner Y, Cohen IR, Fuks Z, Vlodavsky I: Inhibition of heparanase-mediated degradation of extracellular matrix heparan sulfate by non-anticoagulant heparin species. Blood. 1987, 70 (2): 551-557.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nakajima M, DeChavigny A, Johnson CE, Hamada J, Stein CA, Nicolson GL: Suramin. A potent inhibitor of melanoma heparanase and invasion. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266 (15): 9661-9666.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Simizu S, Ishida K, Wierzba MK, Osada H: Secretion of heparanase protein is regulated by glycosylation in human tumor cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (4): 2697-2703. 10.1074/jbc.M300541200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Levidiotis V, Freeman C, Punler M, Martinello P, Creese B, Ferro V, Vlag van der J, Berden JHM, Parish CR, Power DA: A Synthetic Heparanase Inhibitor Reduces Proteinuria in Passive Heymann Nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004, 15 (11): 2882-2892. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000142426.55612.6D.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hua-Quan M, Hu L, Navarro E, Kussie P, Zhenping Z: Development of heparanase inhibitors for anti-cancer therapy. Curr Med Chem. 2006, 13 (18): 2101-2111. 10.2174/092986706777935230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T: Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001, 411 (6836): 494-498. 10.1038/35078107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Izquierdo M: Short interfering RNAs as a tool for cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2004, 12 (3): 217-227. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH: Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1999, 288 (5): 911-940. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nicosia RF, Ottinetti A: Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab Invest. 1990, 63 (1): 115-122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cohen I, Pappo O, Elkin M, San T, Bar-Shavit R, Hazan R, Peretz T, Vlodavsky I, Abramovitch R: Heparanase promotes growth, angiogenesis and survival of primary breast tumors. Int J Cancer. 2006, 118 (7): 1609-1617. 10.1002/ijc.21552.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Elkin M, Ilan N, Ishai-Michaeli R, Friedmann Y, Papo O, Pecker I, Vlodavsky I: Heparanase as mediator of angiogenesis: mode of action. FASEB J. 2001, 15 (9): 1661-1663.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vlodavsky I, Friedmann Y: Molecular properties and involvement of heparanase in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2001, 108 (3): 341-347.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Boyd D: Invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1996, 15 (1): 77-89. 10.1007/BF00049488.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vlodavsky I, Friedmann Y, Elkin M, Aingorn H, Atzmon R, Ishai-Michaeli R, Bitan M, Pappo O, Peretz T, Michal I, Spector L, Pecker I: Mammalian heparanase: Gene cloning, expression and function in tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 1999, 5 (7): 793-802. 10.1038/10518.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hulett MD, Freeman C, Hamdorf BJ, Baker RT, Harris MJ, Parish CR: Cloning of mammalian heparanase, an important enzyme in tumor invasion and metastasis. Nat Med. 1999, 5 (7): 803-809. 10.1038/10525.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    McKenzie E, Tyson K, Stamps A, Smith P, Turner P, Barry R, Hircock M, Patel S, Barry E, Stubberfield C, Terrett J, Page M: Cloning and expression profiling of hpa2, a novel mammalian heparanase family member. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000, 276 (3): 1170-1177. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3586.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bar-Sela G, Kaplan-Cohen V, Ilan N, Vlodavsky I, Ben-Izhak O: Heparanase expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma inversely correlates with patient survival. Histopathology. 2006, 49 (2): 188-193. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02469.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ikeguchi M, Hirooka Y, Kaibara N: Heparanase gene expression and its correlation with spontaneous apoptosis in hepatocytes of cirrhotic liver and carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39 (1): 86-90. 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00558-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Koliopanos A, Friess H, Kleeff J, Shi X, Liao Q, Pecker I, Vlodavsky I, Zimmermann A, Buchler MW: Heparanase expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (12): 4655-4659.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Edovitsky E, Elkin M, Zcharia E, Peretz T, Vlodavsky I: Heparanase gene silencing, tumor invasiveness, angiogenesis, and metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96 (16): 1219-1230.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Miao HQ, Elkin M, Aingorn E, Ishai-Michaeli R, Stein CA, Vlodavsky I: Inhibition of heparanase activity and tumor metastasis by laminarin sulfate and synthetic phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. Int J Cancer. 1999, 83 (3): 424-431. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991029)83:3<424::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-L.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Karoli T, Liu L, Fairweather JK, Hammond E, Li CP, Cochran S, Bergefall K, Trybala E, Addison RS, Ferro V: Synthesis, biological activity, and preliminary pharmacokinetic evaluation of analogues of a phosphosulfomannan angiogenesis inhibitor (PI-88). J Med Chem. 2005, 48 (26): 8229-8236. 10.1021/jm050618p.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Khvorova A, Reynolds A, Jayasena SD: Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell. 2003, 115 (2): 209-216. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00801-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schwarz DS, Hutvágner Gr, Du T, Xu Z, Aronin N, Zamore PD: Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex. Cell. 2003, 115 (2): 199-208. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00759-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kretschmer-Kazemi Far R, Sczakiel G: The activity of siRNA in mammalian cells is related to structural target accessibility: a comparison with antisense oligonucleotides. Nucl Acids Res. 2003, 31 (15): 4417-4424. 10.1093/nar/gkg649.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Luo KQ, Chang DC: The gene-silencing efficiency of siRNA is strongly dependent on the local structure of mRNA at the targeted region. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 318 (1): 303-310. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Heale BSE, Soifer HS, Bowers C, Rossi JJ: siRNA target site secondary structure predictions using local stable substructures. Nucl Acids Res. 2005, 33 (3): e30-10.1093/nar/gni026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Patzel V: In silico selection of active siRNA. Drug Discov Today. 2007, 12 (3-4): 139-148. 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.11.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schubert S, Grünweller A, Erdmann VA, Kurreck J: Local RNA target structure influences siRNA efficacy: systematic analysis of intentionally designed binding regions. J Mol Biol. 2005, 348 (4): 883-893. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Holen T, Amarzguioui M, Wiiger MT, Babaie E, Prydz H: Positional effects of short interfering RNAs targeting the human coagulation trigger tissue factor. Nucl Acids Res. 2002, 30 (8): 1757-1766. 10.1093/nar/30.8.1757.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vlodavsky I, Goldshmidt O, Zcharia E, Atzmon R, Rangini-Guatta Z, Elkin M, Peretz T, Friedmann Y: Mammalian heparanase: involvement in cancer metastasis, angiogenesis and normal development. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002, 12 (2): 121-129. 10.1006/scbi.2001.0420.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liu Tg, Yin JQ, Shang By, Min Z, He Hw, Jiang Jm, Chen F, Zhen Ys, Shao Rg: Silencing of hdm2 oncogene by siRNA inhibits p53-dependent human breast cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2004, 11 (11): 748-756. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700753.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/33/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30200284, No. 30600278, No. 30772359), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (NCET-06-0641), and Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry (2008889).

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Pathology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China

      Liduan Zheng

    2. Department of Surgery, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China

      Guosong Jiang, Hong Mei, Jiarui Pu & Qiangsong Tong

    3. Department of Central Laboratory, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China

      Jihua Dong

    4. Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China

      Xiaohua Hou

    Authors
    1. Liduan Zheng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Guosong Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Hong Mei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Jiarui Pu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Jihua Dong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Xiaohua Hou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Qiangsong Tong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Qiangsong Tong.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    TQS designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. ZLD, JGS, MH and PJR performed cell culture, gene transfection and experimental detection. DJH and HXH were engaged in drafting the manuscript and in statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Liduan Zheng, Guosong Jiang contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Zheng, L., Jiang, G., Mei, H. et al. Small RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of heparanase abolishes the invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells. BMC Cancer 10, 33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-33

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Gastric Cancer
    • Gastric Cancer Cell
    • Advanced Gastric Cancer
    • Human Gastric Cancer Cell
    • Cell Adhesion Assay

    BMC Cancer

    ISSN: 1471-2407

    Contact us