Skip to main content

C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and Glasgow prognostic score are associated with prognosis and infiltration of Foxp3+ or CD3+ lymphocytes in colorectal liver metastasis



Inflammatory indices and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have prognostic value in many cancer types. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of inflammatory indices and evaluate their correlation with survival and presence of TILs in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).


Medical records of 117 patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM were retrospectively reviewed. We calculated inflammatory indices comprising the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between these ratios and the GPS and survival rates and immunohistochemical results of tumor-infiltrating CD3+, CD8+, and Foxp3+ lymphocytes.


The patients with low CAR values and low GPS had significantly better overall survival as per the log-rank test (p = 0.025 and p = 0.012, respectively). According to the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, the CAR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33–0.99; p = 0.048) and GPS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19–0.83; p = 0.013) were independent prognostic factors. Additionally, Foxp3+ lymphocytes were more common in samples from the patients with a low CAR (p = 0.041). Moreover, the number of CD3+ TILs was significantly higher in the patients with a low GPS (p = 0.015).


The CAR and GPS are simple, inexpensive, and objective markers associated with predicting survival in patients with CRLM. Moreover, they can predict the presence of Foxp3+ and CD3+ lymphocytes in the invasive margin of a tumor.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

Peer Review reports


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Approximately, 33% of patients with CRC experience metastasis during clinical course, which worsens their survival. Liver is the most common site of metastasis in patients with CRC. Liver resection remains the only potential curative treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 44–49.6% [2, 3]. Nevertheless, the recurrence rate after hepatectomy for CRLM has been reported to be approximately 62% [4]. Therefore, identifying effective biomarkers is necessary for predicting CRLM recurrence risk and chances for survival.

Systemic inflammation and cancer are closely inter-related. Cancer-related inflammation can affect tumor progression, which in turn induces systemic inflammation [5, 6]. In several cancers, including CRLM, inflammatory indices such as the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) have been indicated to have good prognostic values. In addition, the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which assigns categorical values between 0 and 2 depending on a combination of serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin, has also been proven to have a good prognostic value [7,8,9,10,11]. Thus, systemic inflammation is a key factor in tumorigenesis. However, its detailed mechanism remains unclear.

The host tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in cancer progression. Some studies have reported that presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) influences long-term outcomes of many cancer types [12,13,14]. In patients with CRC, higher numbers of CD3+ and/or CD8+ TILs are associated with better prognosis. However, a high number of Foxp3+ TILs can be indicative of either better or worse prognosis, depending on the primary tumor site and other accompanying factors [15, 16]. Although several studies have evaluated the relationship between inflammatory indices and presence of TILs [17, 18], no reports have assessed this relationship in patients with CRLM.

Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the prognostic value of inflammatory indices, including the NLR, PLR, CAR, and GPS, and evaluate their correlation with the presence of TILs in patients with CRLM.



The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kurume University, Kurume, Japan (approval number: 21228) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The medical records of 202 Japanese patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM at Kurume University between January 2006 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, records of 85 cases were excluded: 34 cases had undergone repeated hepatectomy for CRLM and 33 cases had metastases to other sites, including the lungs, lymph nodes, and/or peritoneum. In addition, curative resection was not achieved in 5 cases. In the remaining 13 excluded cases, pathological evaluation was not performed due to missing samples. Therefore, totally, the data of pathologically confirmed 117 patients were reviewed.

Data collection

Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patients’ medical records. Blood samples were collected during the week prior to surgery. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we selected oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based regimens with/without therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Postoperative follow-up was conducted as follows: levels of tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or carbohydrate antigen 19–9 were measured every 3 months after surgery. Computed tomography was performed every 3–6 months after surgery. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from surgery to recurrence or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death.

Calculation and cutoff value of each inflammatory index

Each inflammatory index was calculated as: NLR, ratio between peripheral blood neutrophil and lymphocyte counts; PLR, ratio between peripheral blood platelet and lymphocyte counts; CAR, ratio between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin concentrations. The GPS was calculated using both CRP and albumin concentrations. The corresponding cutoff values were < 1.0 mg/dL for CRP and ≥ 3.5 g/dL for albumin. If both CRP and serum albumin concentrations were within reference values, the GPS was set to 0. If either one of them was out of reference, the GPS was set to 1. If both CRP and albumin concentrations were out of reference values, the GPS was set to 2. Median values were used as cutoff values for NLR, PLR, and CAR. Regarding each index, we categorized the patients in two groups (“low” or “high”) depending on their results with respect to the cutoff. In regard to the GPS, “low” corresponds to a GPS = 0 and “high” corresponds to a GPS = 1 or 2.


Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue slides were cut in 4 μm, examined on a coated glass slide, and labeled with the following antibodies using the Bond-III autostainer (Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK): anti-CD3 antibody (1:300, clone LN10, Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK, Catalog No: CD3–565-L-CE), anti-CD8 antibody (1:200, clone 4B11, Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK, Catalog No: CD8-4B11-L-CE), and anti-Foxp3 antibody (1:100, clone 236A/E7, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, Catalog No: ab20034). Briefly, samples for anti-CD3, -CD8, and -Foxp3 antibodies were heat-treated using epitope retrieval solution 2 (pH 9.0) at 99 °C for 15, 15, and 30 min, respectively, and then incubated with each antibody for 30 min at room temperature. This automated system used a Refine detection system (Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK) with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polymer as the secondary reagent and 3,3′ diaminobenzidine as the chromogen.

Evaluation of TILs

Expression of each protein in the surrounding normal liver parenchyma was used as positive and negative internal controls in all cases. The total number of lymphocytes (expressing CD3, CD8, and Foxp3) in the tumor center (TC) and at the invasive margin (IM) was separately counted at × 400 magnification. To reduce effects of tumor heterogeneity, three well-stained spots were evaluated in each sample, and the average of the three measurements was used for analyses. Representative immunohistochemistry images are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative immunohistochemical images of CD3+, CD8+, and Foxp3+ lymphocytes in the tumor center (TC) and invasive margin (IM)

Statistical analyses

Clinicopathological characteristics in the two groups (low NLR versus high NLR, low PLR versus high PLR, low CAR versus high CAR, and GPS:0 versus GPS: 1/2) were compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables: sex, primary tumor location, NAC, onset, metastatic tumor location, and tumor number. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables: age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative CEA level, and liver tumor diameter. There were no missing values in the present study. Recurrence-free and OS curves between the two groups were created using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Moreover, model assumptions were verified by the likelihood ratio test. The variables that might affect prognosis were added into the Cox proportional hazard model, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The variables showing significant associations with RFS or OS using the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP Pro version 15 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Patient characteristics

Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with low or high NLR, PLR, CAR, and GPS values are summarized in Table 1. Compared with the other groups, there were more male patients in the high NLR group (p = 0.017). Liver tumor diameter was significantly larger in the high PLR, CAR, and GPS groups (p = 0.001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.011, respectively). The percentage of patients receiving NAC was significantly higher in the high CAR group (p = 0.045).

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients according to the level of inflammatory indices

Comparison of RFS and OS between the low and high NLR, PLR, CAR, and GPS groups

The RFS and OS curves of the low and high NLR, PLR, CAR, and GPS groups are shown in Fig. 2. RFS curves were not significantly different between the groups. However, the low CAR and low GPS groups were associated with significantly better OS (p = 0.025 and p = 0.012, respectively). In the NLR and PLR groups, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of RFS and OS according to the levels of inflammatory indices. CAR, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; OS, overall survival; PLR, platelet/lymphocyte ratio; RFS, recurrence-free survival

Univariate and multivariate analyses for RFS and OS

The results of univariate and multivariate analyses for RFS and OS are shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of recurrence-free survival
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival

Univariate analysis showed that NAC (“no” versus “yes”; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27–0.66; p = 0.0002), onset (metachronous versus synchronous; HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23–0.59; p < 0.0001), tumor location (bilober versus hemilober; HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.05–2.59; p = 0.029), and tumor number (solitary versus multiple; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38–0.94; p = 0.026) were prognostic factors for RFS. As per the multivariate analysis, onset (metachronous versus synchronous; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28–0.78; p = 0.0038) was an independent prognostic factor. The univariate analysis demonstrated that NAC (“no” versus “yes”; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34–0.99; p = 0.045), onset (metachronous versus synchronous; HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29–0.87; p = 0.014), tumor location (bilober versus hemilober; HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09–3.20; p = 0.024), the CAR (< 0.030 versus 0.030≤; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.93; p = 0.027), and the GPS (0 versus 1/2; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20–0.84; p = 0.015) were the prognostic factors for OS. On multivariate analysis, CAR (< 0.030 versus 0.030≤; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33–0.99; p = 0.048) and GPS (0 versus 1/2; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19–0.83; p = 0.013) were the independent prognostic factors.

Relationship between each inflammatory index and presence of TILs

We evaluated the relationship between each inflammatory index and the presence of TILs. Foxp3+, a marker of regulatory T-cells, was expressed more intensely in the IM in the patients with a low CAR (p = 0.041), and the number of CD3 + TILs in the IM was significantly higher in the low GPS group (p = 0.015) (Fig. 3). Differences in the number of other TILs between the groups were not significant (Additional files 1, 2 and 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between the level of inflammatory indices and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes


In this study, we evaluated the utility of inflammatory indices, including the NLR, PLR, CAR, and GPS, in terms of the long-term outcomes of CRLM after hepatectomy. Clinicopathological features differed between the groups in terms of sex, tumor diameter, and percentage in patients who underwent NAC. The low CAR and GPS groups showed significantly better OS using the log-rank test. Furthermore, low values of the CAR and GPS were independent prognostic factors for better OS using univariate and multivariate analyses. Moreover, the low CAR group was related to high infiltration of Foxp3+ lymphocytes, and a low GPS was associated with a high number of CD3+ TILs.

Both the CAR and GPS depend on CRP and albumin levels. CRP is an acute phase protein secreted by hepatocytes in response to acute inflammatory stimuli through producing interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Some cytokines, including IL-1 and IL-6, are released during cancer progression [19]. Thus, CRP levels may reflect tumor activation. Serum albumin level is an indicator of immune nutritional status. Hypoalbuminemia induces an impaired immune response, which in turn, promotes cancer growth. Additionally, decreased albumin levels demonstrate an increased inflammatory status with elevated levels of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-1, and IL-6, which may contribute to cancer progression [20]. Therefore, high CAR or GPS may reflect impaired tumor immunity and suggest tumor progression.

The present study showed that Foxp3+ and CD3+ lymphocytes were more commonly found in samples from the low CAR and low GPS groups, respectively. Nakayama et al. revealed an association between CRP and TILs in patients with renal cell carcinoma: higher CRP levels indicated a stronger infiltration of CD8+, Foxp3+, and CD163+ TILs [18]. Martin et al. showed that lower CAR levels were related to CD8+ TILs presence [17]. Foxp3+ lymphocytes have been reported to suppress anti-tumor immunity, which worsens survival [21, 22]. However, many studies have revealed that presence of Foxp3+ lymphocytes was associated with favorable prognosis in patients with primary CRC [12, 15, 16, 23]. Ladoire et al. described that a possible reason for this discrepancy may have been due to the characteristics of gut microbiota. They suggested that Foxp3+ lymphocytes may prevent bacteria-driven inflammation and carcinogenesis [24]. However, generally, there are no microbiomes in the liver. Alternatively, high Foxp3 expression has been associated with better OS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on its capacity to inhibit the expression of the oncogenic protein c-Myc and induce apoptosis in tumor cells [25]. Thus, the association between high Foxp3 expression and good prognosis in patients with CRLM needs further research.

The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery recommended preoperative determination of the GPS in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer [26]. The present study demonstrated that both CAR levels and the GPS had prognostic value for OS in patients with CRLM. Although the CAR is based on continuous variables such as CRP and serum albumin levels, the GPS depends on categorical variables. In the present study, only 11.1% of patients were categorized as having mGSP 1 or 2. Other reports on CRLM also showed that only 11–14% of cases were categorized as having GPS 1 or 2 [27, 28]. Thus, we suggest that CAR may sufficiently represent the systemic inflammatory status and have a good predictive value for survival in patients with CRLM.

In patients with CRLM, multidisciplinary therapy, including NAC, is pivotal. Therefore, effective predictors of chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors responses are warranted to prolong survival. Some researchers have reported that response to immune checkpoint inhibitors differed according to the number of TILs [29, 30]. However, TILs can only be evaluated using surgical specimens, and biopsy samples cannot overcome sampling errors or tumor heterogeneity. Our study indicated that some inflammatory indices were associated with the presence of TILs. This means that inflammatory indices, rather than TILs’ status, may be good predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy.

The present study has several limitations. First, there might be a potential risk of selection bias due to the single-center retrospective design. Second, NAC was administered to some patients, which might have influenced systemic inflammatory status and presence of TILs. Third, other immune cells, such as CD4+, CD163+, PD-1+, and PD-L1+ TILs, were not evaluated in the present study, which could be helpful for a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between systemic inflammation and the tumor microenvironment. Finally, there might be problems about the weak statistical power in the present study. Using stricter p values such as with Bonferroni correction in the multiple hypothesis testing, as in our study, has been previously recommended. Additionally, in an analysis of statistical power, the effect size of the CAR was 0.19. Thus, the effect size was small and our results should be interpreted with caution.

In conclusion, the CAR and GPS are simple, inexpensive, and objective assessment tools for evaluating the inflammatory status in patients with CRLM and predicting survival. In addition, these tools can indicate presence of certain types of TILs in the IM of tumor.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].



C-reactive protein/albumin ratio


Carcinoembryonic antigen


Confidence interval


Colorectal cancer


Colorectal liver metastasis


C-reactive protein


Hazard ratio


Invasive margin


Glasgow prognostic score


Neoadjuvant chemotherapy


Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio


Overall survival


Platelet/lymphocyte ratio


Tumor center


Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes


Recurrence-free survival


  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scherman P, Syk I, Holmberg E, Naredi P, Rizell M. Influence of primary tumour and patient factors on survival in patients undergoing curative resection and treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. BJS Open. 2020;4:118–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Väyrynen V, Wirta EV, Seppälä T, Sihvo E, Mecklin JP, Vasala K, et al. Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study. BJS Open. 2020;4:685–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butte JM, Gönen M, Allen PJ, Peter Kingham T, Sofocleous CT, DeMatteo RP, et al. Recurrence after partial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer: potentially curative role of salvage repeat resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2761–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McMillan DC. Cancer and systemic inflammation: stage the tumour and stage the host. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:529.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma W, Zhang P, Qi J, Gu L, Zang M, Yao H, et al. Prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35378.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conci S, Campagnaro T, Danese E, Lombardo E, Isa G, Vitali A, et al. Role of inflammatory and immune-nutritional prognostic markers in patients undergoing surgical resection for biliary tract cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:3594.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakamoto Y, Mima K, Imai K, Miyamoto Y, Tokunaga R, Akiyama T, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and clinical outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol. 2020;35:243–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haruki K, Shiba H, Horiuchi T, Sakamoto T, Gocho T, Fujiwara Y, et al. Impact of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Am J Surg. 2017;214:752–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deng Y, Zhao Y, Qin J, Huang X, Wu R, Zhou C, et al. Prognostic value of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index for patients with colorectal liver metastasis undergoing curative resection. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021;27:633480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanno H, Miyoshi H, Yoshida N, Sudo T, Nakashima K, Takeuchi M, et al. Differences in the immunosurveillance pattern associated with DNA mismatch repair status between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:3032–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagès F, Berger A, Camus M, Sanchez-Cabo F, Costes A, Molidor R, et al. Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2654–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salama P, Phillips M, Grieu F, Morris M, Zeps N, Joseph D, et al. Tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T regulatory cells show strong prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. deLeeuw RJ, Kost SE, Kakal JA, Nelson BH. The prognostic value of FoxP3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cancer: a critical review of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3022–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin D, Rödel F, Balermpas P, Winkelmann R, Fokas E, Rödel C. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as prognostic marker for anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakayama T, Saito K, Kumagai J, Nakajima Y, Kijima T, Yoshida S, et al. Higher serum C-reactive protein level represents the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:e1151–e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito K, Kihara K. C-reactive protein as a biomarker for urological cancers. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:659–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S, Mcclave SA, Martindale RG, Miller KR, Hurt RT. Hypoalbuminemia and clinical outcomes: what is the mechanism behind the relationship? Am Surg. 2017;83:1220–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiryu S, Ito Z, Suka M, Bito T, Kan S, Uchiyama K, et al. Prognostic value of immune factors in the tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:1197.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng X, Jin W, Wang S, Ding H. Progression on the roles and mechanisms of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2021;12:729705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berntsson J, Svensson MC, Leandersson K, Nodin B, Micke P, Larsson AH, et al. The clinical impact of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer differs by anatomical subsite: a cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:1654–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ladoire S, Martin F, Ghiringhelli F. Prognostic role of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells infiltrating human carcinomas: the paradox of colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60:909–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gong Z, Jia H, Yu J, Liu Y, Ren J, Yang S, et al. Nuclear FOXP3 inhibits tumor growth and induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting c-Myc. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the international study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakagawa K, Tanaka K, Nojiri K, Kumamoto T, Takeda K, Ueda M, et al. The modified Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of survival after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1711–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Okimoto S, Kobayashi T, Tashiro H, Kuroda S, Ishiyama K, Ide K, et al. Significance of the Glasgow prognostic score for patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Int J Surg. 2017;42:209–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Havel JJ, Chowell D, Chan TA. The evolving landscape of biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:133–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plesca I, Tunger A, Müller L, Wehner R, Lai X, Grimm MO, et al. Characteristics of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes prior to and during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:364.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Akihiko Kawahara for his technical assistance, Chiyo Tsutsumi for her statistical advice, and Editage for editing the manuscript (


None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception and design: H. Kanno, Development of methodology: H. Kanno, J. Akiba. Data collection: H. Kanno, F. Fujita, Analysis and interpretation of data: H. Kanno, Writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript: H. Kanno, T. Hisaka, Study supervision: T. Hisaka, Y. Akagi. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Kanno.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kurume University, Kurume, Japan (approval number: 21228) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Research Ethics Committee of Kurume University because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

None declared.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanno, H., Hisaka, T., Akiba, J. et al. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and Glasgow prognostic score are associated with prognosis and infiltration of Foxp3+ or CD3+ lymphocytes in colorectal liver metastasis. BMC Cancer 22, 839 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Colorectal liver metastasis
  • Inflammatory index
  • Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes