Skip to main content
Download PDF

A novel tool for predicting the risk of central lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 606 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 24 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Central lymph node status in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) plays an important role in treatment decision-making clinically, however, it is not easy to predict central lymph node metastasis (CLNM). The present work focused on finding the more rational alternative for evaluating central lymph node status while identifying influencing factors to construct a model to predict CLNM incidence.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the typical sonographic and clinicopathologic features of 546 PTMC patients who underwent surgery, among which, the data of 382 patients were recruited in the training cohort and that of 164 patients in the validation cohort. Based on the outcome of the training cohort, significant influencing factors were further identified through univariate analysis and were considered as independent variables in multivariable logistic regression analysis and incorporated in and presented with a nomogram.

Results

In total, six independent predictors, including the age, sex, tumor size, multifocality, capsular invasion, Hashimotos thyroiditis were entered into the nomogram. Both internal validation and external validation revealed the favorable discrimination of our as-constructed nomogram. Calibration curves exhibited high consistency. As suggested by decision-curve analyses, the as-constructed nomogram might be applied in clinic. Besides, the model also distinguished patients according to risk stratification.

Conclusions

The novel nomogram containing remarkable influencing factors for CLNM cases was established in the present work. The nomogram can assist clinicians in clinical decision-making.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Thyroid cancer (TC) shows an increasing incidence globally within the last decades [1, 2], primarily, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and it is mostly due to the advancement and popularization of neck diagnostic imaging, ultrasonography (US), as well as US-assisted fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) [1, 3]. Despite the increased incidence of papillary thyroid cancer, its mortality rate is relatively low and stable [4]. TC currently ranks fifth among the most common cancer diagnosed in women [5, 6]. Additionally, it is estimated that it will be the second leading cancer diagnosed in women and the ninth leading cancer diagnosed in men by 2030 [5, 6].

According to the classification system by the World Health Organization, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) refers to the PTC that is ≤10 mm. PTMC generally presents the idle clinical process and has a better prognosis than many other malignancies, with a five-year disease-specific survival of greater than 98% [3], a subset of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) usually shows potentially aggressive behavior [7]. Central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) has become frequently seen in PTMC cases and has been considered as the adverse factor that predict metastases and relapse [8]. Presently, lymph node dissection (LND) has become a common surgical strategy in clinical lymph node-positive (cN1) PTMC patients. Nevertheless, it remains controversial about prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND)‘s function among PTMC patients with negative clinical lymph node (cN0). The discrepancies between different guidelines have been noted.

The 2015 British Thyroid Association (BTA) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines indicate that routine prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) is not performed on T1 and T2 or noninvasive (cN0) PTMC patients [9, 10], but patients with extrathyroidal extension or with tumors greater than 4 cm need pCND. This differs from the guidelines in China and Japan. According to the 2016 edition of the consensus and guidelines of experts on the diagnosis and treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in China, pCND is feasible in patients with cN0 PTMC [11]. According to the consensus statement from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery Task Force on Management for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, active surveillance (AS) can be performed in adult patients with low-risk PTMC. However, patients with LNM, distant metastasis, and invasion of adjacent organs (especially the trachea and recurrent laryngeal nerve) should be treated surgically [12]. Moreover, the latest guidelines released by diverse international entities change their efforts on restricting the redundant selection and management for diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancers [9, 13]. Hence, it is necessary to determine whether cN0 PTMC patients need pCND.

Currently, ultrasonography (US) has been an important approach that can assess the CLNM in PTC patients non-invasively. However, whether US is a good choice for the evaluation of CLNM remains debatable, especially for imbalanced sensitivity (23.0–61.0%) and specificity (86.8–97.0%) [14,15,16,17]. A meta-analysis revealed that US performed poorly while determining the presence of CLNM [18]. The high rate of CLNM and the low sensitivity of ultrasonography make it challenging to evaluate the factors associated with CLNM. Considering that the status of the lymph node is important for making clinical decisions, many scholars have studied the preoperative ultrasonographic features of CLNM [19, 20]. Therefore, the accurate identification of the sonographic and clinicopathologic features for predicting CLNM in patients with PTMC is the crucial first step in making a therapeutic decision and the prognosis of the patients.

There are no quantified standards in clinical practice yet that can predict the probability of CLNM, the evaluation of the risk of CLNM is only through the surgeon’s experience and general guidelines.

Hence, the aims of our study were the identification of the factors that significantly influence CLNM and the development of a nomogram for predicting CLNM among individuals.

Materials and methods

Selection of the patients

We obtained materials for the present work at Hebei General Hospital, China. From 1st October 2014 to 1st October 2020, 916 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma patients underwent surgery at our hospital. Among them, we examined 546 cases receiving pCND in the present retrospective work (Fig. 1). Cases were randomized as training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Flow diagram of study design. PTMC:Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; CLNM: central lymph node metastasis

Full size image

The inclusion criteria of the participants were shown below: (1) cases undergoing the first thyroid surgery, and a postoperative pathology confirmed as PTMC; (2) patients who underwent bilateral or unilateral central lymph node dissection; (3) patients who were examined by ultrasonography and laboratory tests at our hospital before the operation; (4) patients who did not have a history of radiation and other head and neck malignant tumors.

The exclusion criteria of the participants were as follows: (1) patients who were not examined by ultrasonography at our hospital before surgery; (2) patients with other systemic malignancies; (3) patients who had received a thyroidectomy previously; (4) patients without complete medical records; (5) patients with poor cardiopulmonary function; (6) patients who had undergone levothyroxine supplementation therapy.

Ultrasound analysis

Based on the above-mentioned patient screening standards, we selected 546 PTMC patients for the study. Ultrasonography was performed by two deputy chief physician of the ultrasound department who were professionally trained and with extensive clinical experience. In cases that the experts had different opinions, the third senior expert chief physician was involved in the discussion and a final decision was made. The parameters that were noted for further analysis were age, sex, thyroid stlmulating hormone (TSH) level before surgery, aspect ratio (the anteroposterior dimension/the transverse diameter), tumor size, capsular invasion, calcification, multifocality, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), nodular goiter, and central lymph node metastasis (CLNM).

Selection of the predictors

To construct the model for statistical analysis, we considered the status of central lymph node metastasis as the response variable, with two categories, N0 and N1 (N1a + N1b). The parameters which we considered as factors that could influence the involvement of the central lymph node in PTMC included age, sex, preoperative TSH level, tumor size, aspect ratio (A/T), capsular invasion, calcification, multifocality, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), and nodular goiter. According to the most recent revision (eighth edition) of TNM by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), the threshold of age for high-risk of disease-specific mortality was updated from 45 years to 55 years; patients in this study were divided into three age groups, below 45 years, between 45 and 55 years, and above 55 years. Tumor size, which indicates the maximum diameter of a tumor, was recorded as a continuous variable and then converted into a categorical variable with two categories: < 0.65 cm and ≥ 0.65 cm. Multifocality was categorized either as solitary lesions or multifocal lesions. A solitary lesion was defined as the presence of a tumor at one site within the thyroid, while multifocal lesions indicated the presence of tumors at two or more sites in the thyroid gland. The capsular invasion of the primary PTMC was classified into two groups, and the other variables were also divided into two groups.

Statistical analysis

We took the SPSS statistical package (version 23.0, IBM Corp.) and the R software (version 3.5.2) for the data analysis. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to represent continuous variables. Besides, categorical variables were shown as the number and percentages of cases, and odds ratio (OR) which had 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the current work, the Student’s t-test was performed to compare the continuous variables. Meanwhile, to investigate the categorical variables, the Chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test in specific scenarios) was carried out when making the comparison of the differences among a variety of groups. The risk factors in association with CLNM were analyzed based on univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling. In order to confirm the independent influential factors, the multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted by choosing all variables possessing a p-value less than 0.05 in the univariate analysis. Regarding the multivariable logistic analysis, variables which are not statistically significant were eliminated from the final model. At the same time, those possessing a p-value less than 0.05 were regarded as independent risk factors and chosen in the final model. Risk stratification of the model by K-Means cluster analysis. The significance level for all statistical tests was set at 0.05. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Nomogram establishment and verification

In order to develop a precise approach to accurately and quantitatively estimate the risk of CLNM in individuals, we established a nomogram incorporating each identified risk factor which were discovered from multivariable regression based on training cohort with R software “rms” package. We just considered those risk factors that were discovered through multivariable regression in our eventual model for nomogram construction, rather than variables with statistical significance upon univariate analysis but not upon multivariable analysis. Upon multivariate regression, we converted the risk factors’ regression coefficients into the certain values ranging from 0 to 100. We assessed the discrimination ability, which indicated nomogram prediction accuracy, through the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve and concordance index (C-index) for internal/external verification. We estimated the nomogram prediction performance based on training cohort, and later verified it based on validation cohort. We also conducted calibration for comparing the consistency of probability of CLNM estimated by our constructed nomogram with the actual measurements. This study then acquired calibration curves for the two cohorts and later adopted Hosmer-Lemeshow test for assessment. To evaluate the ultrasonographic nomogram’s apparent incremental utility, we evaluated the nomogram’s clinical utility by the decision-curve analyses (DCA).

Risk stratification

We distinguished the patients based on the risk scores. In the training cohort and validation cohort, we established risk stratification based on patient risk scores, and divided patients into three subgroups: low score risk group, medium score risk group and high score risk group, and we also compared the positive rate of CLNM between different subgroups.

Results

Demographics and ultrasound characteristics of PTMC patients

The general characteristics of 546 patients with PTMC, including age, sex, thyroid stlmulating hormone (TSH) level before surgery, aspect ratio (the anteroposterior dimension/the transverse diameter), tumor size, capsular invasion, calcification, multifocality, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), nodular goiter, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 General characteristics of 546 patients with PTMC
Full size table

Analysis of demographic and ultrasound characteristics

Compared to non-CLNM patients, patients in CLNM group had higher levels of preoperative TSH. There was no difference in the aspect ratio (A/T) between the two groups (48.50% vs. 53.00%). Additionally, the rate of the capsular invasion was significantly different between the two groups (18.40% vs. 7.90%). The rate of calcification in CLNM group was higher than non-CLNM groups (72.40% vs. 59.50%). The rate of multifocality was significantly different between the two groups (52.80% vs. 27.70%). Among HT patients, the patients with CLNM had a lower frequency of HT compared to the non-CLNM patients (12.30% vs. 21.10%). The rate of nodular goiter between the two groups was similar (42.30% vs. 40.50%).

The patient features of both cohorts

Table 2 displays patient features for both cohorts. Positive CLNM rate was 29.80% in training cohort and 29.90% in validation cohort(P > 0.05). No significant difference in baseline clinicopathological and sonographic features was observed between both cohorts, which verified homogeneity in baseline data between two cohorts.

Table 2 Characteristics of patients in the Training cohort and test cohort
Full size table

Predictors of CLNM in PTMC patients

Figure 2 and Table 3 list results of univariate as well as multivariate regression. Upon the univariate analysis, six significant factors were found, including age, sex, tumor size, capsular invasion, multifocality, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Six risk factors (age, tumor size, capsular invasion, multifocality, and HT) were incorporated in regression analysis upon the multivariable analysis. At last, age (OR 0.418, 95% CI:0.235–0.743 / (OR 0.251,95% CI:0.125–0.506)), sex (OR 2.681, 95% CI:1.454–4.943), tumor size (OR 2.858, 95% CI: 1.728–4.727), capsular invasion (OR 2.466, 95% CI: 1.123–5.415), multifocality (OR 3.516, 95% CI: 2.095–5.901), and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (OR 0.354, 95% CI: 0.164–0.766) were found to be the independent risk factors for CLNM.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Nomogram in estimating the risk of CLNM in PTMC. To assess metastasis risk:(1) drawing a vertical line from each variable axis to the “Points” axis. (2) adding the points of each variable and locate them on the “Total Point” axis. (3) Then drawing a vertical line from the “Total Points” axis to the axis labeled “Risk” to obtain the individual probability of central lymph node metastasis. PTMC:papillary thyroid microcarcinoma;CLNM:central lymph node metastasis

Full size image
Table 3 Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis in the training cohort
Full size table

Nomogram establishment and verification for predicting CLNM

We established the CLNM prognostic nomogram by incorporating six independent influencing factors (Fig. 2). Later, we determined points for all predicting factors by plotting the upward straight line from individual predicting factors that showed certain status to “Point” axis, in nomogram application. Thereafter, we added each point of those six  predicting factors to determine the overall points for separate patients. We later drew the downward straight line from “Total-Point” axis to “Probability-of-CLNM” axis to determine CLNM incidence among PTMC cases.

Furthermore, the AUC was 0.774 (95% CI: 0.723 to 0.826) for training cohort (Fig. 3a) while 0.709 (95% CI: 0.626 to 0.793) for validation cohort (Fig. 3b). As shown in the Hosmer-Lemeshow’s test results, the p-values were more than 0.05 in training cohort and validation cohort, and the Chi-square value were 5.0464 and 6.0584 in the training and validation cohorts. The calibration curve of CLNM nomogram suggested strong agreement between the training cohort (Fig. 4a) and the validation cohort (Fig. 4b), which indicated the high discriminating ability and consistency. Based on DCA, this model was better than those models where either all patients were treated or none underwent treatment (Fig. 5a, b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve for the predictive of preoperative ultrasonographic features. A The predictive model of CLNM in training cohort was accurate and discriminating, with AUC of 0.774. B The predictive model of CLNM in validation cohort was accurate and discriminating, with AUC of 0.709. AUC = area under ROC curve; ROC = receiver operating characteristic

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Calibration curves of the nomogram for predicting CLNM in PTMC patients. A Calibration curve of the nomogram for training cohort. B Calibration curve of the nomogram for validation cohort. The x-axis represents the predicted CLNM. The y-axis represents the actual CLNM. The diagonal dotted line stands for a perfect prediction using an ideal model. We drew the solid line to represent the performance of the nomogram, of which the closer fit to the diagonal dotted line represents the better prediction of the nomogram. PTMC:papillary thyroid microcarcinoma;CLNM:central lymph node metastasis

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Decision curve analysis for CLNM in PTMC patients in validation cohort. The y-axis represents the net benefit. The red line represents the nomogram of CLNM. The grey line displays the assumption that all patients have CLNM. The black line represents the assumption that no patients have CLNM. PTMC:papillary thyroid microcarcinoma;CLNM:central lymph node metastasis

Full size image

Risk stratification according to the risk scores and comparison of positive rate of CLNM

In the training cohort, there were 121 patients in the low-score-risk group, 174 in the medium-score-risk group, and 87 in the high-score-risk group (Table 4). In the mutual comparison of CLNM positive rates with different score-risk stratification, the P values were less than 0.05, which suggested that the model can distinguish patients according to the risk level (Table 5).

Table 4 Risk stratification in the training cohort
Full size table
Table 5 comparison of positive rates in CLNM with different risk stratification in the training cohort
Full size table

In the validation cohort, 53 patients in the low-score-risk group, 72 in the medium-score-risk group and 39 in the high-score-risk group (Table 6). In the comparison between low-score-risk and middle-score-risk groups, the difference was statistically significant. But in the comparison between middle risk and high risk group, the P value was greater than 0.05, no significant differences were observed for the positive rate of CLNM between the training and validation cohorts. (Table 7)

Table 6 Risk stratification in the validation cohort
Full size table
Table 7 Comparison of positive rates in CLNM with different risk stratification in the validation cohort
Full size table

Discussion

PTC shows an increasing incidence over the past 10 years, predominantly because of the increased detection of PTMC. Even though PTMC is the indolent cancer, some studies discover that PTMC cases with concurrent CLNM have dismal prognostic outcome and disease relapse.

Currently, one of the dilemmas in the management of PTMC patients is to determine whether pCLND should be performed. As found in the meta-analysis including 25 studies, prophylactic neck dissection combined with thyroidectomy is the possibly safe and efficient procedure for treating PTC cases, as it significantly reduces local recurrence [21]. Su et al. [22] also showed similar results. Moreover, a study reported that pCND significantly reduced the recurrence rate but was accompanied by numerous adverse effects [23]. Giordano et al. [24] found that pCND increased the rates of transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. Selected CND is not obviously advantageous in local recurrence and long-term survival but it helps to accurately predict the pathological stage of central neck lymph nodes, although it will lead to an increased incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism [25].

PTMC usually has a relatively high frequency of CLNM; the incidence of CLNM ranged from 13 to 64% in previous studies [26,27,28,29,30], which was largely due to the different choice of surgical modalities. The prevalence of CLNM in our study was 29.8% (163/546), which was similar to the prevalence of CLNM in previous studies [31,32,33].

In this study, age (< 45 years), sex, tumor size, multifocality, capsular invasion, and HT to be the risk factors that independently predicted CLNM among PTMC cases, which was similar to the risk factors determined in previous studies [8, 34,35,36]. However, the significant CLNM predictive risk factors among PTMC were dissimilar partially.

In this study, age was an important predictive factor, especially in patients below 45 years. Previous studies have determined age (< 45 years) as an independent risk factor [34, 36], and we found similar results in this study. Jiwang et al. [8] found that CLNM within PTMC patients was higher among males and younger individuals. Additionally, a study showed that male with a younger age were associated with the higher risk of large LNM in clinically node-negative PTMC [37]. Ding et al. [38] also found that PTC in men is a more aggressive disease and may have a worse prognosis. Sex was statistically significant in the univariate analysis and the multivariable analysis. Sex, as a significant predictor of the risk of CLNM, was consistent between our study and most previous studies. The differences could be explained by ethnic, geographic, patient characteristics, and environmental factors. Therefore, multicenter and large-scale studies are needed to address the problem.

There was no definitive cutoff value for tumor size. Most studies have considered 0.5 cm to be the threshold of size, while Lee and colleagues found that tumors that are greater than 0.7 cm could be important in determining PTMC invasiveness [39]. Gong et al. [40] showed that larger tumors (> 0.85 cm) are more aggressive. The results in this study showed that the high occurrence of CLNM was associated with PTMCs greater than 0.65 cm. Thus, we assumed that larger tumors are probably more aggressive.

In our study, the capsular invasion was shown to be an independent risk factor for predicting CLNM. Previous reports have indicated that extrathyroidal extension (ETE) is an independent predictor of CLNM [34, 35]. But the assessment of extrathyroidal extension remains problemic due to the anatomical features of the thyroid gland, there have no definitive standard about capsular invasion and extrathyroidal extension [34, 35]. Thus, our study take capsular invasion diagnosed by preoperative US as the predictor. The rate of capsular invasion of PTMC in our study was 18.4%, but it varied considerably among studies [34, 35]. The distinction in the incidence could be accounted for by different diagnostic criteria. Additionally, Ruiz Pardo et al. [41, 42] reported that the ETE of PTMC is a factor that indicates worse prognosis and is associated with the presence of metastatic lymph nodes and lower disease-free survival.

As shown in our study, multifocality was also found to be a important predictor of CLNM. Some authors reported multifocality as the the risk factor to independently predict CLNM among cN0 PTMC cases [8, 35, 43]. Additionally, Xue et al. [36] proposed that multiple cancer foci were independent risk factor for lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) in patients with PTMC.

PTC complicated by HT has been discovered in the past 20 years, and the association between the two diseases has been a topic of discussion [44].PTC cases have a remarkably increased HT rate compared with patients who have nonmalignant thyroid tumors [45]. In this study, HT was related to CLNM. HT rate was 18.50% among PTMC patients, and the rate of CLNM was 12.30% in the HT group, which was lower compared to that in the non-HT group (87.70%). Kim et al. [45] reported that HT, related to PTC, might protect against CLNM. Liang et al. [44] also found that PTC cases who had HT had low rates of central and lateral LNM (19.6% vs. 9.5%). The autoimmune response to thyroid-specific antigens in patients with HT might be involved in the destruction of cancer cells that express thyroid-specific antigens in PTC, thus preventing recurrence and LNM. Nonetheless, Jeong et al. [46] found that central LNM was not different in PTC cases with HT compared with those with no HT. The correlation between the prognostic outcomes of the two diseases in PTMC is still unclear.

Few studies have predicted CLNM among PTMC cases based on the nomogram. In the present work, a nomogram was established to predict CLNM incidence among PTMC cases based on six independent influencing factors. As reported, an AUC value over 0.7 implies good discriminating ability. In our study, the AUC for the training and validation cohorts were 0.774 and 0.709, respectively. The calibration plots showed a good agreement between the actual probability and the predicted probability of CLNM in all cohorts. The decision curve analysis also demonstrated the potential application value of our nomogram. As suggested by DCA, the as-constructed nomogram might be applied in clinic. These results suggested that the as-constructed nomogram had a high discriminating capacity for CLNM detection among PTMC cases. Furthermore, we achieved a remarkable achievement compared to other similar models [47,48,49]. According to our nomogram, we calculated the risk scores of each patient, and patients were also stratified into different subgroup by their risk scores.

Our study had several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, and the data used to construct the model came from a single center. Second, although 382 and 164 cases were enrolled in training and validation cohorts, respectively, further research is warranted, in particular those at other institutions, so as to assess whether our results are applicable in the external population. Third, we collected data only on representative ultrasonic features; the future prediction model should include more features from preoperative genotypes and representative images from FNAB cases. Despite these disadvantages, our nomogram showed favorable discriminating capacity as well as internal verification in predicting CLNM.

Thus, before making treatment decisions, we recommend a strict preoperative evaluation, especially for patients with a high nomogram score. The cutoff point can depend on how the patients and doctors evaluate and perceive risk. We conclude that our nomogram is a practical and objective tool for providing evidence for both physicians and patients.

Conclusion

In our study, we presented a new nomogram, which might be used to identify CLNM incidence among PTMC cases, and thus, help physicians and patients to make an informed choice regarding surgery. For patients with a high score on the nomogram, clinicians may consider pCND and rigorous evaluation of the patient after the operation.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Change history

Abbreviations

PTC:

Papillary thyroid cancer

TC:

Thyroid cancer

TSH:

Thyroid stimulating hormone

US:

Ultrasonography

FNAB:

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy

PTMC:

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

CLNM:

Central lymph node metastasis

PCND:

Prophylactic central neck dissection

HT:

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

AJCC:

American Joint Committee on Cancer

SD:

Standard deviation

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence intervals

AUC:

The receiver operating characteristic curve

References

  1. Yoshida Y, Horiuchi K, Okamoto T. Patients' view on the management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: active surveillance or surgery. Thyroid. 2020;30(5):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeon MJ, Kim WG, Chung K-W, Baek JH, Kim WB, Shong YK. Active surveillance of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: where do we stand? Eur Thyroid J. 2019;8(6):298–306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang TS, Sosa JA. Thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer—recent advances and future directions. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(11):670–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molinaro E, Campopiano MC, Elisei R. Management of endocrine disease: papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: toward an active surveillance strategy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185(1):R23–r34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haugen BR. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: what is new and what has changed? Cancer. 2017;123(3):372–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):2913–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ullmann TM, Gray KD, Moore MD, Zarnegar R, Fahey TJ III. Current controversies and future directions in the diagnosis and management of differentiated thyroid cancers. Gland Surg. 2018;7(5):473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiwang L, Yahong L, Kai L, Bo H, Yuejiao Z, Haotian W, et al. Clinicopathologic factors and preoperative ultrasonographic characteristics for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a single center retrospective study. Brazilian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;S1808–8694(20):30062–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, Evans C, Evans RM, Gerrard Ba G, et al. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;81:1–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao M, Ge M, Ji Q, Cheng R, Lu H, Guan H, et al. 2016 Chinese expert consensus and guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Cancer Biol Med. 2017;14(3):203–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Takeuchi D, Nakayama H, Masaki C, Shindo H, et al. Indications and strategy for active surveillance of adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: consensus statements from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery Task Force on Management for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2021;31(2):183–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Leenhardt L, Erdogan M, Hegedus L, Mandel S, Paschke R, Rago T, et al. 2013 European thyroid association guidelines for cervical ultrasound scan and ultrasound-guided techniques in the postoperative management of patients with thyroid cancer. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2(3):147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Roh JL, Park JY, Kim JM, Song CJ. Use of preoperative ultrasonography as guidance for neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):28–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang HS, Orloff LA. Efficacy of preoperative neck ultrasound in the detection of cervical lymph node metastasis from thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(3):487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee D, Ji YB, Sung E, Park J, Lee Y, Park DW, et al. Roles of ultrasonography and computed tomography in the surgical management of cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2013;39(2):191–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim E, Park JS, Son K-R, Kim J-H, Jeon SJ, Na DG. Preoperative diagnosis of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and combined ultrasound with computed tomography. Thyroid. 2008;18(4):411–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xing Z, Qiu Y, Yang Q, Yu Y, Liu J, Fei Y, et al. Thyroid cancer neck lymph nodes metastasis: Meta-analysis of US and CT diagnosis. Eur J Radiol. 2020;129:109103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang W-H, Xu S-Y, Zhan W-W. Clinicopathologic factors and thyroid nodule sonographic features for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study of 1204 patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(11):2475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao Y, Qu N, Zhang L, Chen JY, Ji QH. Preoperative ultrasonography and serum thyroid-stimulating hormone on predicting central lymph node metastasis in thyroid nodules as or suspicious for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2016;37(6):7453–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu H, Li Y, Mao Y. Local lymph node recurrence after central neck dissection in papillary thyroid cancers: a meta analysis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2019;136(6):481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Su H, Li Y. Prophylactic central neck dissection and local recurrence in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a meta-analysis☆,☆☆. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85:237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu W, Zhong M, Ai Z. Systematic evaluation of prophylactic neck dissection for the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(9):883–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Giordano D, Valcavi R, Thompson GB, Pedroni C, Renna L, Gradoni P, et al. Complications of central neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: results of a study on 1087 patients and review of the literature. Thyroid. 2012;22(9):911–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giordano D, Frasoldati A, Gabrielli E, Pernice C, Zini M, Castellucci A, et al. Long-term outcomes of central neck dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38(5):576–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kwak JY, Kim E-K, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Chung WY, Park CS, et al. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: predicting factors of lateral neck node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1348–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, et al. Clinical significance of metastasis to the central compartment from papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2006;30(1):91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wada N, Duh Q-Y, Sugino K, Iwasaki H, Kameyama K, Mimura T, et al. Lymph node metastasis from 259 papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: frequency, pattern of occurrence and recurrence, and optimal strategy for neck dissection. Ann Surg. 2003;237(3):399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hay ID, Hutchinson ME, Gonzalez-Losada T, McIver B, Reinalda ME, Grant CS, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008;144(6):980–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chow SM, Law SC, Chan JK, Au SK, Yau S, Lau WH. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid—prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and multifocality. Cancer. 2003;98(1):31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li M, Zhu XY, Lv J, Lu K, Shen MP, Xu ZL, et al. Risk factors for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (CN0): a study of 273 resections. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(17):3801–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gui CY, Qiu SL, Peng ZH, Wang M. Clinical and pathologic predictors of central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Endocrinol Investig. 2018;41(4):403–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Feng JW, Ye J, Wu WX, Qu Z, Qin AC, Jiang Y. Management of cN0 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma patients according to risk-scoring model for central lymph node metastasis and predictors of recurrence. J Endocrinol Investig. 2020;43(12):1807–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang C, Li BJ, Liu Z, Wang LL, Cheng W. Predicting the factors associated with central lymph node metastasis in clinical node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(4):1191–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sheng L, Shi J, Han B, Lv B, Li L, Chen B, et al. Predicting factors for central or lateral lymph node metastasis in conventional papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2020;220(2):334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu G-M, Wang Z-H, Chen Y-B, Li C-H, Zhang Y-J, Li X-J, et al. Analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastases in elderly patients with papillary thyroid micro-carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:7143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen G, Ma H, Huang R, Kuang A. Predicting large-volume lymph node metastasis in the clinically node-negative papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study. Nucl Med Commun. 2020;41(1):5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ding J, Wu W, Fang J, Zhao J, Jiang L. Male sex is associated with aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis in Chinese papillary thyroid carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee KJ, Cho YJ, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Kim JG, Ahn CJ, et al. Analysis of the clinicopathologic features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma based on 7-mm tumor size. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):318–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gong Y, Li G, Lei J, You J, Jiang K, Li Z, et al. A favorable tumor size to define papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: an analysis of 1176 consecutive cases. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pardo JR, Zambudio AR, González JR, Quiles MP, Giménez VS, Ramírez MO, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with minimal extrathyroidal extension. Is its course so indolent that it requires a less aggressive treatment? Revista Clínica Española (English Edition). 2021;221(3):131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pardo JR, Ríos A, Rodríguez JM, Paredes M, Soriano V, Oviedo MI, et al. Factores de riesgo de metástasis ganglionares en el microcarcinoma papilar de tiroides. Cirugía Española. 2020;98(4):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuan J, Li J, Chen X, Lin X, Du J, Zhao G, et al. Identification of risk factors of central lymph node metastasis and evaluation of the effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on migration of staging and risk stratification in patients with clinically node-negative papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Bull Cancer. 2017;104(6):516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Liang J, Zeng W, Fang F, Yu T, Zhao Y, Fan X, et al. Clinical analysis of Hashimoto thyroiditis coexistent with papillary thyroid cancer in 1392 patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(5):393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SS, Lee BJ, Lee JC, Kim SJ, Jeon YK, Kim MR, et al. Coexistence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis with papillary thyroid carcinoma: the influence of lymph node metastasis. Head Neck. 2011;33(9):1272–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jeong JS, Kim HK, Lee C-R, Park S, Park JH, Kang S-W, et al. Coexistence of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis with papillary thyroid carcinoma: clinical manifestation and prognostic outcome. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(8):883–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen BD, Zhang Z, Wang KK, Shang MY, Zhao SS, Ding WB, et al. A multivariable model of BRAF(V600E) and ultrasonographic features for predicting the risk of central lymph node metastasis in cN0 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:7211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang L, Ling Y, Zhao Y, Li K, Zhao J, Kang H. A nomogram based on Clinicopathological and ultrasound imaging characteristics for predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in cN0 unilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Front Surg. 2021;8:742328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wei X, Min Y, Feng Y, He D, Zeng X, Huang Y, et al. Development and validation of an individualized nomogram for predicting the high-volume (>Б─┴5) central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. J Endocrinol Investig. 2022;45(3):507–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The wordings of the main text and figures/tables were checked by Quality Proofreading by PSUK Communications Ltd., https://qualityproofreading.co.uk/.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. The First Clinical Academy of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China

      Qian-wen Luo

    2. Department of Gland Surgery, HeBei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, HeBei, China

      Shan Gao, Si-jia Li, Qing-qing Han & Tao Gong

    3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, People’s Hospital of Dongxihu District, Wuhan, 430040, Hubei, China

      Xiao Lv

    4. The Second Clinical Academy of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China

      Bo-fang Wang & Yun-peng Wang

    5. Department of surgical oncology, The Lanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China

      Quan-lin Guan

    Authors
    1. Qian-wen Luo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Shan Gao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Xiao Lv
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Si-jia Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Bo-fang Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Qing-qing Han
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Yun-peng Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Quan-lin Guan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Tao Gong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    LQW, GQL and GT conceived of and designed the study, LX and GS performed the analysis, LQW interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. WBF and LSJ performed the revision and validation of the manuscript. HQQ and WYP performed the data collection and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Quan-lin Guan or Tao Gong.

    Ethics declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    The study procedure conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the approval for the study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Hebei General Hospital. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hebei General Hospital because of the retrospective nature of this study.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Quan‑lin Guan is the first corresponding author.

    The original version of this article was revised: Affiliations for Quan-lin Guan and Tao Gong have been corrected.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Luo, Qw., Gao, S., Lv, X. et al. A novel tool for predicting the risk of central lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 22, 606 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09655-5

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09655-5

    Keywords

    BMC Cancer

    ISSN: 1471-2407

    Contact us