Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Taxane-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy is associated with an SCN9A single nucleotide polymorphism in Japanese patients

BMC Cancer volume 20, Article number: 325 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sodium channels located in the dorsal root ganglion, particularly Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, encoded by SCN9A and SCN10A, respectively, act as molecular gatekeepers for pain detection. Our aim was to determine the association between TIPN and SCN9A and SCN10A polymorphisms.

Methods

Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SCN9A and two in SCN10A were investigated using whole-genome genotyping data from 186 Japanese breast or ovarian cancer patients classified into two groups as follows: cases that developed taxane-induced grade 2–3 neuropathy (N = 108) and controls (N = 78) with grade 0–1 neuropathy. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between TIPN and SNP genotypes.

Results

SCN9A-rs13017637 was a significant predictor of grade 2 or higher TIPN (odds ratio (OR) = 3.463; P = 0.0050) after correction for multiple comparisons, and precision was improved when only breast cancer patients were included (OR 5.053, P = 0.0029). Moreover, rs13017637 was a significant predictor of grade 2 or higher TIPN 1 year after treatment (OR 3.906, P = 0.037), indicating its contribution to TIPN duration.

Conclusion

SCN9A rs13017637 was associated with the severity and duration of TIPN. These findings are highly exploratory and require replication and validation prior to any consideration of clinical use.

Peer Review reports

Background

Taxanes, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel, are used to treat a variety of tumor, especially breast and ovarian cancer [1, 2]. The common non-hematologic toxicity associated with these drugs is peripheral neuropathy. Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) can be dose limiting, which would affect treatment efficacy, and can worsen quality of life. As susceptibility to TIPN differs greatly among patients [3, 4], predicting patient risk could improve therapeutic efficacy and quality of life by personalizing treatment.

To date, several genes have been reported as potential risk factors for TIPN, including those associated with transport (e.g. ABCB1) [5,6,7], metabolism (e.g. CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2C8) [5, 8,9,10], development and regeneration in the nervous system (e.g. EPHA4 and EPHA5) [11], myelination in peripheral nerve (FGD4) [11], and β-tubulin (TUBB2A) [12]. Thus, many pharmacogenetic studies have attempted to identify polymorphisms that contribute to variations in susceptibility to TIPN; however, current data are insufficient to make genetic testings routine for these variants.

Many different hypotheses regarding the mechanisms of sensory TIPN have been generated, including excessive microtubule assembly, which causes the abnormal accumulation of disorganized microtubules disrupting normal cellular activities such as axonal transport and Schwann cell function; however, this process is still unclear [13, 14]. Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) located in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), particularly Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, encoded by SCN9A and SCN10A, respectively, have important roles in the pathogenesis of human neuropathic pain [15,16,17]. VGSC mutations were reported to be associated with diseases of both the central and peripheral nervous systems [18]. Especially, mutations in SCN9A play a significant role in nociception signaling and have been associated with channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder, whereas the protein encoded by SCN10A is a tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel (SCNA) subunit that might be involved in painful peripheral neuropathy (PN) [15, 16]. Moreover, dorsal ganglionic Nav1.7 is upregulated in rats and humans administered paclitaxel. Blocking the function of Nav1.7 was found to partially attenuate paclitaxel-induced hyperalgesia in rats. This suggests that this protein is involved in paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain [19, 20]. However, no pharmacogenetic studies have focused on the association between TIPN and SCNA in a clinical setting. Therefore, we investigated the effects of SNPs in genes encoding VGSC using a prospective cohort of well-characterized breast or ovarian cancer patients treated with taxanes.

Methods

Patients

Japanese women with breast or ovarian cancer receiving taxane regimens were enrolled in a prospective observational study to evaluate taxane-related toxicity and to explore gene variants associated with TIPN by performing a genome wide association study (UMIN000005294) [7]. The eligibility criteria are shown in previous study [7]. All patients provided written informed consent for adjuvant treatment and DNA collection for genetic analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local institutional review board (protocol number: 2013–199).

Treatment

Breast cancer patients were treated with 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) (AC) or cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) with epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) (CEF) every 3 weeks. Subsequently, paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, weekly) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) was administered for 12 weeks. In addition, 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, day1) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2, day1) every 3 weeks (CPA + DTX) was also an option for breast cancer treatment. Patients positive for HER2 by immunohistochemistry or gene amplification analysis received trastuzumab concurrently with paclitaxel (weekly or every 3 weeks). Ovarian cancer patients were treated with 6 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC6, day 1) every 3 weeks (Tri TC), or paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (AUC6, day 1) every 3 weeks (dose-dense TC).

TIPN evaluation

Neuropathy was prospectively evaluated at baseline before paclitaxel treatment, at week 7, within 3 weeks at or after the final dose, and 1 year after the last dose of paclitaxel, based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 [21]. Evaluators of PN are five medical oncologists who are trained in toxicity assessment. One patient was evaluated by the same physician.

Genotyping

A 10-mL blood sample was collected from each patient upon enrollment. Genotyping assays were performed for eligible patients with sufficient DNA in the sample. DNA was extracted from whole-blood samples using standard procedures. The extracted DNA was dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and the concentration was adjusted to 100 ng/ml for whole-genome genotyping using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). To analyze polymorphisms within and around the SCN9A and SCN10A gene regions, whole-genome genotype data were used. Whole-genome genotyping was performed using the Infinium assay II and the iScan system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The OmniExpressExome-8 v1.1 BeadChip was used to genotype entire samples. The BeadChip included a number of probes that was specific to copy number variation markers, but most were for SNP markers on human autosomes or sex chromosomes. Approximately 900,000 SNP markers were included in the BeadChip. After whole-genome genotyping, data were analyzed using GenomeStudio Genotyping module v1.6.3 (Illumina) to evaluate the quality of results, and genotype data for SNPs with SCN9A and SCN10A gene annotations were extracted. The analyzed SNPs were SCN9As (rs7607967, rs12994338, and rs13017637) and SCN10A (rs12632942 and rs6795970), which were evaluated in previous reports [17, 22,23,24,25].

Statistical analysis

The primary objective was to evaluate the association between TIPN grade and SCN9A and SCN10A variants. The association between genetic variants and the risk of grade 2–3 TIPN was assessed by logistic regression analysis with adjustments for confounding clinical covariates. The dependent variable was maximum TIPN grade (grades 0–1 or 2–3), and the independent variables were type of cancer (breast cancer vs. ovarian cancer), age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60 years), TIPN latency, and genotype data for each SNP; alternatively, the dependent variable was TIPN grade 1 year after treatment, and the independent variables were maximum TIPN grade, TIPN duration, and genotype data for each SNP. TIPN duration is defined as time from onset of PN until disappearance of PN or at 1 year of treatment. We preliminarily planned to dichotomize age at 60 years and compare TIPN, referring to our previous study [3]. For the selected polymorphisms, we considered either an additive, dominant, or recessive model. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate relative risk. SCN9A and SCN10A frequencies were assessed for concordance with expectations based on the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), using the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Given the sample size of cases (108 patients with grade 2–3 TIPN) and controls (78 patients with grade 0–1 TIPN) and assuming a power of 85%, the level of significance was 0.1. Power calculations were performed using G*power software v3.1.9.2. All analyses were performed using the highest grade of treatment-related sensory peripheral neuropathy. Patients for whom taxane-based chemotherapy was discontinued due to adverse events, except neuropathy, were excluded from the analyses. Multiple comparisons were accounted for by using Bonferroni adjustment α = 0.05 (corrected alpha (α = 0.05/5 = 0.01)). A two-sided adjusted P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

We analyzed 186 of 221 Japanese women enrolled between February 2011 and October 2013 at the two study sites. Thirty-five patients were excluded, including patients lost to follow-up (N = 16), patients not treated with taxane (N = 9), patients with a history of prior taxane use (N = 5), patients for whom chemotherapy was discontinued due to adverse events other than peripheral neuropathy (N = 1), and other reasons (N = 4). The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are listed in Table 1. The median age was 52 years (range, 25–81 years). The number of breast and ovarian cancer patients was 135 and 51, respectively. One hundred and seventy-seven patients received paclitaxel treatment, whereas nine patients received docetaxel. Among 186 patients studied, for 38 (20%) and 16 (8%), the dose was reduced or treatment was terminated because of neuropathy or reasons other than neuropathy, respectively. Maximum grades of TIPN were 0 (N = 2, 1%), 1 (N = 76, 41%), 2 (N = 91, 49%), and 3 (N = 17, 9%).

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

Distribution of SCN9A and SCN10A genotypes

Genotypes in each SNP are listed in Table 1. Genotyping call rates by SNP and patient were estimated. We confirmed that both call rates (by SNP and patient) were > 0.95 and all SNPs and samples were included in the analyses. The distributions of the SCN9A (rs7607967, rs12994338, and rs13017637) and SCN10A (rs12632942 and rs6795970) polymorphisms were all in accordance with the HWE (data not shown).

Association between SNPs and maximum TIPN grade

Results of dominant genetic model were reported in text and tables. Results of other models were not shown because they were not statistically significant. Of the five SNPs evaluated, SCN9A-rs13017637 was significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN in all patients (OR, 3.463, P = 0.0050; Table 2). In addition, SCN9A-rs13017637 was significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN among the 135 breast cancer patients (OR, 5.053, P = 0.0029; Table 2).

Table 2 SNPs correlate with severity of TIPN† (grade 0–1 vs. grade 2–3) in all patients and in breast cancer patients (subset analysis), and SNPs correlate with TIPNa (grade 0–1 vs. grade 2–3) at 1 year after completion of taxane treatment in all patients
Full size table

Association between SNPs and TIPN grade 1 year after taxane

Of the five SNPs evaluated, SCN9A-rs13017637 was significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN in all patients (OR, 3.906, P = 0.037; Table 2). However, no SNPs were significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN among the 135 breast cancer patients.

Discussion

We evaluated the effect of sodium channel-related genes on TIPN development in breast or ovarian cancer patients treated with taxane. Multiple logistic regression revealed that SCN9A-rs13017637 was significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN. It was also significantly associated with grade 2 or higher TIPN 1 year after the completion of taxane-based therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that SNPs of sodium channel-related genes are associated with increased TIPN severity in Japanese patients treated with taxane.

Sodium channels in the DRG function as molecular gatekeepers of pain detection at peripheral nociceptors. Nine sodium channel subunits have been identified (Nav1.1–Nav1.9), each with a unique central and peripheral nervous system distribution. Gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in SCN9A, encoding Nav1.7, cause inherited erythromelalgia and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder, rare familial diseases associated with excruciating pain [26,27,28]. In contrast, loss-of-function mutations cause congenital pain insensitivity, a rare autosomal recessive disease [26, 27]. Rare missense variants have also been reported in SCN9A [29, 30] and SCN10A [30, 31] in patients with painful small fiber neuropathy. It is thought that enhanced Nav channel activity might directly contribute to pain experienced by these patients because several identified missense variants exerted GOF effects in cell-based electrophysiology assays [32]. Our findings indicate that SCN9A-rs13017637 is a risk factor for TIPN severity. However, the function of SCN9A-rs13017637 is not known. SCN10A-rs6795970 reportedly affects human pain sensitivity. A recent study suggested that SNPs in voltage-gated sodium channel genes (SCN9A-rs6754031 and SCN10A-rs12632942) can cause oxaliplatin-based peripheral neurotoxicity [24, 25, 33, 34]. A polymorphism in SCN9A (rs6746030) was also reported to be associated with decreased neurotoxicity [35]. However, these polymorphisms were not associated with TIPN in our study. Thus, there could be different predisposing polymorphisms for different ethnic groups. Moreover, a selective Nav1.7 channel blocker was shown to decrease firing frequency in the human DRG with spontaneous action potentials. This suggests that Nav1.7 might be a potential new target for TIPN treatment [19]. However, these results must be validated by larger and prospective studies.

There were some limitations to this study. First, we focused on paclitaxel or docetaxel as taxane regimens. There might be possible differences between paclitaxel and docetaxel regarding the severity or duration of PN. Moreover, platinum added to taxane might influence PN because it was reported as a risk factor for chemotherapy-induced PN [36]. Second, although cumulative drug doses were different, no adjustments were made for multiplicity of inferences. However, differences in cumulative doses were small and would be less likely to influence TIPN development. Third, our study focused on SCN9A and SCN10A, which were evaluated based on previous studies; other sodium channel subunits such as Nav1.9 were not evaluated. Fourth, there was a possible issue with type I error for this study because of multiple test.

Conclusion

TIPN was associated with SCN9A-rs13017637 in Japanese breast or ovarian cancer patients who received taxane. This finding is highly exploratory and requires replication and validation prior to any consideration of clinical use.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TIPN:

Taxane Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

VGSCs:

Voltage Gated Sodium Channels

DRG:

Dorsal Root Ganglion

SCNA:

Synuclein alpha

PN:

Peripheral Neuropathy

AC:

Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide

CEF:

Cyclophosphamide and Epirubicin and 5-Fluorouracil

CPA:

Cyclophosphamide

DTX:

Docetaxel

TC:

Carboplatin and Paclitaxel

ORs:

Odds ratios

Cis:

Confidence intervals

HWE:

Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium

GOF:

Gain Of Function

References

  1. Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, et al. Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1663–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vasey PA, Jayson GC, Gordon A, et al. Scottish Gynaecological Cancer trials group. Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1682–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanabe Y, Hashimoto K, Shimizu C, et al. Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18:132–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee JJ, Swain SM. Peripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1633–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gréen H, Söderkvist P, Rosenberg P, et al. Pharmacogenetic studies of paclitaxel in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;104:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sissung TM, Baum CE, Deeken J, et al. ABCB1 genetic variation influences the toxicity and clinical outcome of patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4543–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanabe Y, Shimizu C, Hamada A, et al. Paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy is associated with an ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphism and older age in Japanese. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79:1179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Graan AJ, Elens L, Sprowl JA, et al. CYP3A4*22 genotype and systemic exposure affect paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3316–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hertz DL, Roy S, Motsinger-Reif AA, et al. CYP2C8*3 increases risk of neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1472–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leskelä S, Jara C, Leandro-García LJ, et al. Polymorphisms in cytochromes P450 2C8 and 3A5 are associated with paclitaxel neurotoxicity. Pharmacogenomics J. 2011;11:121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldwin RM, Owzar K, Zembutsu H, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies novel loci for paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy in CALGB 40101. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5099–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abraham JE, Guo Q, Dorling L, et al. Replication of genetic polymorphisms reported to be associated with taxane-related sensory neuropathy in patients with early breast cancer treated with paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2466–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flatters SJ, Bennett GJ. Studies of peripheral sensory nerves in paclitaxel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction. Pain. 2016;122:245–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peters CM, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Kuskowski MA, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW. An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Brain Res. 2007;1168:46–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akopian AN, Souslova V, England S, et al. The tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel SNS has a specialized function in pain pathways. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:541–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu FH, Catterall WA. Overview of the voltage-gated sodium channel family. Genome Biol. 2003;4:207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vargas-Alarcon G, Alvarez-Leon E, Fragoso JM, et al. A SCN9A gene-encoded dorsal root ganglia sodium channel polymorphism associated with severe fibromyalgia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Catterall WA. From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: the structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 2000;26:13–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, North RY, Rhines LD, et al. DRG voltage-gated sodium channel 1.7 is up-regulated in paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in rats and in humans with neuropathic pain. J Neurosci. 2018;38:1124–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia Z, Xiao Y, Wu Y, Zhao B. Sodium channel Nav1.7 expression is upregulated in the dorsal root ganglia in a rat model of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Springerplus. 2016;5:1738 eCollection.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen AP, Setser A, Anadkat MJ, et al. Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:1025–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duan G, Xiang G, Guo S, et al. Genotypic analysis of SCN9A for prediction of postoperative pain in female patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Pain Physician. 2016;19:E151–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duan G, Guo S, Zhang Y, et al. The effect of SCN9A variation on basal pain sensitivity in the general population: an experimental study in young women. J Pain. 2015;16:971–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Argyriou AA, Cavaletti G, Antonacopoulou A, et al. Voltage-gated sodium channel polymorphisms play a pivotal role in the development of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: results from a prospective multicenter study. Cancer. 2013;119:3570–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wadhawan S, Pant S, Golhar R, et al. NaV channel variants in patients with painful and nonpainful peripheral neuropathy. Neurol Genet. 2017;3:e207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vetter I, Deuis JR, Mueller A, et al. NaV1.7 as a pain target—from gene to pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;172:73–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dib-Hajj SD, Yang Y, Black JA, Waxman SG. The Na(V) 1.7 sodium channel: from molecule to man. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:49–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang Z, Chen Z, Tang B, Jiang H. Primary erythromelalgia: a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Faber CG, Hoeijmakers JG, Ahn HS, et al. Gain of function NaV1.7 mutations in idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:26–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brouwer BA, Merkies IS, Gerrits MM, Waxman SG, Hoeijmakers JG, Faber CG. Painful neuropathies: the emerging role of sodium channelopathies. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2014;19:53–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Faber CG, Lauria G, Merkies IS, et al. Gain-of-function NaV1.8 mutations in painful neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:19444–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoeijmakers JG, Faber CG, Merkies IS, Waxman SG. Painful peripheral neuropathy and sodium channel mutations. Neurosci Lett. 2015;596:51–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adelsberger H, Quasthoff S, Grosskreutz J, Lepier A, Eckel F, Lersch C. The chemotherapeutic oxaliplatin alters voltage-gated Na (+) channel kinetics on rat sensory neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;406:25–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Palugulla S, Thakkar DN, Kayal S, Narayan SK, Dkhar SA. Association of voltage-gated sodium channel genetic polymorphisms with oxaliplatin-induced chronic peripheral neuropathy in south Indian cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:3157–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sereno M, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez G, Rubio JM, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of SCN9A are associated with oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Avan A, Postma TJ, Ceresa C, et al. Platinum-induced neurotoxicity and preventive strategies: past, present, and future. Oncologist. 2015;20:411–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Masayo Kawamura, Ms. Nao Nakamura, Ms. Kiyomi Nonogaki, and Ms. Hitomi Sato for helping with data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by a Scientific Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (H21–021), the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-30, 26-A-20), and a study grant from Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease (No. 2018–23). The role of the funding body: in collection of data, analysis software and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

    Yuko Tanabe, Kenji Hashimoto, Akihiko Shimomura, Mayu Yunokawa, Kan Yonemori, Kenji Tamura & Yasuhiro Fujiwara

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan

    Yuko Tanabe, Akihiko Shimomura, Yukinori Ozaki & Toshimi Takano

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Kohnodai Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-7-1, Kohnodai, Ichikawa-shi, Chiba, 272-8516, Japan

    Seiji Shiraishi

  4. Addictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 156-8506, Japan

    Kazutaka Ikeda, Daisuke Nishizawa & Junko Hasegawa

  5. Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan

    Nobuko Tamura & Hidetaka Kawabata

  6. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan

    Chikako Shimizu

Authors
  1. Yuko Tanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seiji Shiraishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenji Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kazutaka Ikeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daisuke Nishizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junko Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Akihiko Shimomura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yukinori Ozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nobuko Tamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mayu Yunokawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kan Yonemori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Toshimi Takano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hidetaka Kawabata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kenji Tamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Chikako Shimizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YT contributed to collecting data and writing the manuscript. YT, CS and DN was a major contributor in analyzing and interpreting the patient data. JH contributed to collecting data. KH contributed the design of this work. SS and KI contributed the interpretation of data. AS, YO, NT, MY, KY, TT, HK, KT and YF contributed the draft of this work and revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Tanabe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided written informed consent for adjuvant treatment and DNA collection for genetic analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of National Cancer Center Hospital and Toranomon Hospital. (protocol number: 2013–199).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanabe, Y., Shiraishi, S., Hashimoto, K. et al. Taxane-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy is associated with an SCN9A single nucleotide polymorphism in Japanese patients. BMC Cancer 20, 325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06834-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06834-0

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us