Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“Safety and utility of percutaneous liver biopsy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant pediatric recipients: a retrospective study”

  • Natalia Maximova1Email author,
  • Massimo Gregori2,
  • Francesca Barbieri3,
  • Antonio Pizzol4 and
  • Aurelio Sonzogni5
BMC Cancer201616:590

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2603-8

Received: 31 January 2016

Accepted: 22 July 2016

Published: 2 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Liver biopsies in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients are as and effective when performed at bedside in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit (BMTU) than in the Day Surgery Unit (DSU), with better patient compliance and lower emotional distress for these children.

Methods

The study group consisted of 45 children who underwent allogeneic HSCT. We reviewed 68 liver biopsies performed between April 2006 and September 2015. 12 (17.6 %) biopsies were performed in the DSU and 56 (82.3 %) in the BMTU; nine (13.2 %) prior to HSCT and 59 (86.7 %) after HSCT. Pre-procedural behavioral status (subjective score) was evaluated by pediatric transplant physicians by filling in a questionnaire employing a three-point scale: “calm and cooperative”, “agitated and non-cooperative” or “frightened and suffering”. Objective score was obtained measuring patient’s heart rate before the procedure and comparing it with mean heart rate.

Results

Patients who underwent the procedure at the BMTU experienced less emotional distress than those who underwent it in the DSU: 58.3 % of patients treated at the DSU were agitated as compared with 16.1 % of those treated at the BMTU (p < 0.01). Among the 59 biopsies performed after HSCT, 41 (69.5 %) were taken from symptomatic patients for a diagnostic purpose and 18 (30.5 %) in asymptomatic ones in order to rule out hepatic GVHD. Among these 18 procedures, GVHD was diagnosed in 16 (88.9 %) cases. Minor complications occurred in about 17 % of procedures (12 biopsies), at a rate of 25 % for the DSU location compared with 16 % for the BMTU location. Only two major complications were reported, one in the DSU and one in the BMTU.

Conclusion

Liver biopsy performed at bedside in HSCT patients does not carry a higher risk of adverse events than the same procedure performed in the DSU and has lower emotional distress associated with better patient compliance, thus contributing significantly to a higher standard of care.

Keywords

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationLiver graft versus host diseasePercutaneous liver biopsyPediatric patientsChild emotional distress

Background

Over recent years, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become an important technique for treating pediatric diseases, especially hematological and oncological disorders and congenital errors, including congenital immunodeficiency. Great improvements in survival rates have been achieved owing to better control of these diseases, introduction of less aggressive conditioning regimens, better management of graft versus host disease and infectious complications, and improvements in human leukocyte antigen typing, which has made highly accurate selection of unrelated donors possible. Thus, the benefits of HSCT now outweigh the associated risks.

However, despite the decrease in transplant-related mortality, previously unknown and difficult to treat complications are common and can result in suboptimal management. One of the most significant of these complications is liver dysfunction, which has been classified by Forbes et al. by cause as follows: graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), drug hepatotoxicity, viral hepatitis, sepsis, veno-occlusive disease, and disease recurrence. A significant proportion of liver complications are still classified as of undetermined cause [1].

Liver biopsy is currently the gold standard means of identifying the nature of hepatic lesions. This invasive procedure is commonly considered high risk for pediatric recipients of allogeneic HSCT because of the possibility of fatal complications such as massive bleeding, gastric perforation, respiratory distress during anesthesia, sepsis, hemothorax, and ascites caused by hepatic failure [2, 3].

We herein report a small retrospective series of 45 pediatric patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants who had undergone ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (single or multiple) between April 2006 and September 2015. Our hypotheses were that it is safer and more effective to perform liver biopsies at the bedsides of such patients than in the Day Surgery Unit (DSU) and that it is associated with better patient compliance and less emotional stress for the child, thus contributing significantly to a higher standard of care.

Methods

Patients

Medical records of all pediatric patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants who had undergone percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy between April 2006 and September 2015 in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit (BMTU) or DSU of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Scientific Research, Burlo Garofolo, in Trieste, Italy were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol (reference no. 1105/2015). Written informed consent for biopsies had been obtained from the parents of all subjects.

During the observation period, 68 percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsies were performed. From April 2006 to April 2012, 12 biopsies (17.64 %) were performed in the DSU, which is external to the BMTU; these biopsies involved a duty radiologist and the entire operating room team. From April 2012 to September 2015, 56 biopsies (82.5 %) were performed on 36 patients in a laminar air flow room in the BMTU; these biopsies involved a pediatric team that included pediatricians certified in Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and BMTU nurses certified in Pediatric Basic Life Support.

The study group consisted of 45 children with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. They were divided into the following four age groups: infants, under 1 year; young children, from 1 to 5 years; children, from 6 to 10 years; and adolescents, from 10 to 18 years [4].

The following data were collected for each study patient: sex, body mass index, primary disease, conditioning regimen, type of donor, GVHD prophylaxis, number of HSCTs, pre-transplant hepatopathy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantification of hepatic iron stores [5], liver function tests, and platelet count at the time of liver biopsy. Baseline patient characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Baselines characteristics of the sample of the study

Baseline characteristics

 

n°

%

DSU (%)

BMTU (%)

Patient n°

 

45

100

7 (15.5)

38 (84.4)

Gender

F

15

33.3

5 (16.3)

13 (86.7)

M

30

66.6

5 (16.7)

25 (83.3)

Age

<1 years

2

15.5

15.5 1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

1–5 years

15

24.4

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

6–10 years

13

28.8

1 (7.8)

12 (92.3)

10–18 years

15

31.1

3 (20.0)

12 (80.0)

Primary disease

AL

27

60.0

4 (14.8)

23 (85.2)

Hemoglobinopathy

1

2.2

-

1 (100)

Inherited disease

6

13.3

1 (16.7)

5 (83.3)

MDS

10

22.2

2 (20.0)

8 (80.0)

Solid tumor

1

2.2

-

1 (100)

Number of HSCT

1

37

82.1

6 (16.3)

31 (83.7)

2

5

11.1

1 (20.0)

4 (80.0)

3

2

4.4

-

2 (100)

Type of Donor

Haploidentical

6

13.3

4 (66.7)

2 (33.3)

Matched related

18

40.0

2 (11.1)

16 (88.9)

Matched unrelated

21

86.6

1 (4.8)

20 (95.2)

Conditioning regimen

Myeloablative

39

86.6

7 (17.9)

32 (82.1)

RIC

6

13.3

-

6 (100)

Gilbert syndrome

Yes

9

20.0

1 (11.1)

8 (88.9)

No

36

80.0

6 (16.6)

30 (83.3)

Pre transplant hepatopathy

No

18

40.0

1 (5.5)

17 (94.4)

Acquired metabolic disorders

1

2.2

-

1 (100)

Drug Hepatotoxicity

1

2.2

-

1 (100)

Inherited metabolic disease

2

4.4

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

Iron overload

21

46.6

4 (19.0)

17 (80.9)

Viral hepatitis

2

4.4

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

MRI quantification LIC

Patients undergoing MRI

42

93.3

4 (9.5)

38 (90.5)

Normal liver

4

9.5

-

4 (100)

Slight overload

16

38.0

-

16 (100)

Moderate overload

8

19.0

2 (25.0)

6 (75.0)

Major overload

14

33.3

2 (14.3)

12 (85.7)

Obesity (BMI >30)

 

6

13.3

2 (33.3)

4 (66.7)

DSU Day Surgery Unit, BMTU Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, F Female, M Male, AL Acute leukemia, MDS Myelodisplasic syndromes, RIC Reduced intensity conditioning, MRI Magnetic resonance imaging, LIC Liver iron concentration, BMI Body mass index

Twenty-seven children (60.0 %) had acute leukemia, ten myelodysplastic syndromes (22.2 %), six inherited diseases (13.3 %), one a solid tumor (2.2 %), and one hemoglobinopathy (2.2 %).

All medical records of biopsy procedures and the post-biopsy observation period, including any treatment for any complications, were examined. Additionally, changes in management prompted by biopsy results were extracted.

Pretransplant conditioning

Thirty-nine of the 45 patients had undergone myeloablative conditioning and the remaining six non-myeloablative conditioning regimens. Recipients of haploidentical or matched unrelated donors had also received antithymocyte globulin.

GVHD prophylaxis was performed with calcineurin inhibitor associated to mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in the matched unrelated and haploidentical donor group.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

The indications for biopsy were persistent or progressive alteration noted at 2 weekly follow-up assessments of at least one clinical or laboratory marker of liver impairment or cholestasis, abnormal radiological findings, or one or more lesions suggestive of hepatic parenchymal infection. Contraindications to biopsy were as follows: severe ascites, refractory thrombocytopenia, failure to correct coagulation defects with transfusions of plasma or specific coagulation factors, and severe respiratory or hemodynamic impairment.

All 45 patients had undergone percutaneous biopsies under deep sedation (five or six Ramsay scale sedation scores [6]). Sedation in the SDU was induced by midazolam, propofol and fentanyl administration, while in the BMTU by midazolam, ketamine and propofol. Both sedation protocols are illustrated in Fig. 1. In the operating room, induction and maintenance of anesthesia were performed by anesthesiologists, in the BMTU by a PALS-certified pediatrician. Additionally, all patients had received prophylactic treatment with parenteral antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid during the 30 min before the procedure. From April 2012 onwards, sedation was administered by a resident pediatrician at the BMTU who had received 4 weeks of training in the operating room and practiced sedation for a further month, during which tutoring was given by a pediatric anesthesiologist [7] and by the radiologist who had performed all the biopsy procedures; this radiologist had extensive experience in pediatric interventional radiology.
Fig. 1

Sedation protocols categorized by location

All procedures were supported by sonography performed by the interventional radiologist who performed the biopsy. A mapping sonogram was used to identify the best approach for hepatic biopsy (generally in the 10th intercostal space in the anterior axillary line) and to ensure a safe needle pathway that minimized the risk of accidental puncture of interposing bowel, gall bladder, lung, right kidney, or intrahepatic vessels and ducts. A MyLab™30 US machine (Esaote, Genova, Italy) with a multiband frequency probe (2.5–6.6 MHz) without a biopsy adaptor was used in all cases.

Needle size was determined by age and body mass index. An Ester automatic core biopsy device (Biopsybell SRL, Mirandola, Italy) with a 16- or 18- gauge 150-mm needle with a drawing area of 20 mm was employed. Twenty liver biopsies (29.4 %) were obtained with 16-gauge, 46 (67.6 %) with 18-gauge, and two (2.9 %) with 20-gauge needles.

Immediately after the biopsy, a further sonography was performed to check for possible bleeding or other complications. In the absence of complications, all patients were observed for 8 h after liver biopsy in our Transplant Unit, in which central monitoring is available. Sonography was usually performed the next day on inpatients and the evening of the same day on outpatients. Patients with acute hemorrhage were examined promptly by sonography CT scan with contrast medium.

Complications were defined as adverse events that occurred as a direct result of the procedure. These were classified as minor (local bleeding evaluable by sonography, local or radiating pain) or major: bleeding requiring transfusion or intervention (Hb decrease > 2 g/dL in the 8 h after the procedure), infection, perforation, unintentional organ injury, postoperative complications directly related to the administration of anesthesia, and specific organ complications such as cholangitis and pneumothorax [8].

Pre-procedural behavior status was evaluated by the pediatric transplant physician of our BMTU, so that the same person made the assessments during liver biopsy in both the DSU and BMTU. To give this subjective score, some minutes before every procedure the pediatrician evaluates the patient’s behavior and asks each patient a few questions to assess anxiety on a 3-point scale: “calm and cooperative”, “agitated and non-cooperative” or “frightened or suffering”. Adverse effects of ketamine administration were reported as “frightened or suffering”. Objective score was obtained measuring patient’s heart rate immediately before administration of anesthetic drugs and comparing it with mean heart rate. The mean heart rate for each of four age groups was calculated using the heart rates documented during entire admission. Heart rate data was obtained by pulse oximetry measurements in both locations (DSU and BMTU). Tachycardia were defined as a 20 % increase above the mean heart rate [9].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS statistical software v.20. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Comparisons between categorical variables were evaluated with Fisher’s exact test. Comparison between numerically limited variables were evaluated with Wilcoxon test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The clinical and biological characteristics of the 45 patients categorized by their location are presented in Table 1. The median time between HSCT and the biopsy procedure was 156 days ± 141 (range 29–641 days) for subjects who had biopsies taken after receiving their transplants; additionally, biopsies were taken before the HSCT in nine (20 %) cases. Of the 68 liver biopsies, 12 (17.6 %) were performed in the DSU and 56 (82.3 %) in the BMTU; 31 (45.6 %) were performed on inpatients and 37 (54.4 %) on outpatients. Suitable samples were obtained in 98.5 % of procedures and microscopic examination of biopsy material revealed abnormalities in 66/68 samples (97.0 %).

In general, platelet counts of more than 100 × 109/L and international normalized ratio (INR) values lower than two prior to the procedure are preferred. Pre-procedure platelet counts were >140 × 109/L in all patients, platelet transfusions having been administered prior to the procedure in 29 cases. None of the HSCT patients in the study had an INR greater than two (median INR 1.07 ± 0.16); three patients received fresh frozen plasma transfusions before the procedure to reduce their high risk of bleeding. The patients’ pre-procedural liver function test results (mean ± standard deviation) were: total bilirubin 0.79 ± 0.69 mg/dL; direct bilirubin 0.37 ± 0.41 mg/dL; alanine transferase 59.79 ± 56.47 U/L; and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 179.54 ± 100.4 U/L. Ascites was observed in 5/of 68 procedures (7.35 %). Pre-transplant hepatopathy had been present in 27 patients (60.0 %), a high proportion being associated with iron overload (46.6 %).

Nine (13.2 %) liver biopsies were performed prior to the HSCT: four to define iron overload disease, one to stage chronic hepatitis B disease, one to confirm the healing of hepatitis C disease after treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin, and two to diagnose hepatopathy of uncertain origin.

Of the 59 liver biopsies (86.76 %) performed after HSCT, 41 (69.49 %) were performed on symptomatic patients for diagnostic purposes and 18 (30.50 %) on asymptomatic patients to determine whether hepatic GVHD was present; 16 of these 18 patients (88.9 %) were found to have GVHD.

In 36 liver biopsies (52.9 %), the pathological findings led to changes in clinical management, either because a new diagnosis was made or resolution or progression of GVHD identified. The finding of resolution of GVHD led to suspension of immunosuppressive treatment, whereas confirmation of GVHD or evidence of progression of this condition prompted intensification of therapy. In 32 hepatic samples (47.1 %) there were no histological changes since the previous diagnosis, and these patients’ therapy was therefore not modified (Table 2).
Table 2

Histological diagnosis and clinical management

Clinical characteristics

 

N° (%)

DSU (%)

BMTU (%)

Total biopsy

 

68 (100)

12 (17.6)

56 (82.3)

Number of biopsy per patient

1

17 (37,7)

3 (17.6)

14 (82.3)

2

17 (37,7)

3 (17.6)

14 (82.3)

≥3

11 (24,4)

1 (9.1)

10 (90.9)

Histological diagnosis

Drug Hepatotoxicity

2 (3,9)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

AIH

1 (1,4)

-

1 (100)

GVHD

24 (35,2)

4 (16,7)

20 (83.3)

GVHD + IO

19 (27,9)

3

16

GVHD + IO + Infection

1 (1,4)

-

1 (100)

GVHD + IO + MD

2 (2,9)

-

2 (100)

Infection

4 (5,8)

1 (25.0)

3 (75.0)

IO + Drug toxicity

4 (5,8)

1 (25.0)

3 (75.0)

IO + Infection

1 (1,4)

1 (100)

-

IO + MD

1 (1,4)

-

1 (100)

Iron overload

6 (8,8)

1 (16.7)

5 (83.3)

Metabolic Disorders

2 (2,9)

0

2 (100)

Normal

1 (1,4)

0

1 (100)

Changes in clinical management

No

32 (47,1)

3 (9.4)

29 (90.6)

Yes

36 (52,9)

9 (25.0)

27 (75.0)

Outcome

Improved

33 (48,5)

6 (18.2)

27 (81.8)

Recovered

13 (19,1)

2 (15.4)

11 (84.6)

Not changed

19 (27,9)

2 (10.5)

17 (89.5)

Worsened

1 (1,4)

1 (100)

0

Death

2 (2,9)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

Histological diagnosis and clinical management. DSU Day surgery unit, BMTU Bone marrow transplant unit, AIH autoimmune hepatitis, GVHD Graft versus host disease, IO Iron overload, MD Metabolic disease

The rate of biopsy procedures without complication was 75 % in the DSU group and 83.9 % in the BMTU group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Minor complications, namely local bleeding and pain at the site of the needle insertion, occurred in about 17 % of procedures (12 biopsies): 3 patients (24.9 %) from the DSU group versus 9 patients (16 %) from the BMTU group. Two major complications were reported: one patient from DSU group had hemorrhage requiring transfusion and one patient from the BMTU had cholangitis requiring antibiotic treatment. Moreover, medication, namely a single dose of an opioid analgesic, was needed in only 9 % of all procedures (six biopsies), with no significant difference between the two groups (Table 3).
Table 3

Complications of biopsies performed in the DSU versus BMTU and behavioral status of patients: Evaluation of major and minor complications after biopsy procedure and treatment adopted for complications; Pre-procedure behavioral status of the patient is also reported

Complications and patient’s behavioral status

DSU location

BMTU location

No Complication

9 (75.0)

47 (83.9)

Minor complications

Local bleeding

2 (16.6)

4 (7.1)

Local pain

1 (8.3)

5 (8.9)

Major Complications

Bleeding requiring transfusion

1 (8.3)

-

Infection

-

1 (1,8)

Complication treatment

None

9 (75.0)

47 (83.9)

Morphine

2 (16.6)

4 (7.1)

Surgical procedure or transfusion

1 (8.3)

-

Tramadol

-

5 (8.9)

Pre-procedure status

Calm and cooperative

5 (41.7)

47 (84.0)

Agitated and non-cooperative

6 (50.0)

8 (14.3)

Frightened or suffering

1 (8.3)

1 (1.8)

As to behavioral status, patients were reported to be “calm and cooperative” in approximately 80 % of pre-procedure evaluations. This difference in incidence of being calm and cooperative between the two procedure locations was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Additionally, 58 % of patients who had undergone biopsies in the DSU were assessed as agitated or non-cooperative versus 16 % of those in the BMTU (also significant; p < 0.01) (Table 3). The number of tachycardia events (objective score) was signicantly higher in the DSU than in the BMTU (58.3 % versus 16.1 %; P < 0.01). Unfortunately the sample is very heterogenous, and many of the age groups, especially in the DSU population, are to small for statistical comparison. The pre-procedural heart rates and the incidence of tachycardia events are reported in the Table 4.
Table 4

Baseline heart rate and tachycardia events categorized by location: BMTU, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit; DSU, Day Surgery Unit

Age groups

BMTU LOCATION

DSU LOCATION

N° of biopsies (%)

Baseline heart rate

Tachycardia (%)

P a Value

N° of biopsies(%)

Baseline heart rate

Tachycardia (%)

P a Value

<1 year

2 (2.9)

136.5 (±7.78)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 - 5 years

8 (11.7)

121.1 (±11.87)

1 (12.5)

NS

3 (4.4)

124.6 (±4.72)

1 (33.3)

NS

6 – 10 years

17 (25.0)

101.47 (±13.48)

6 (35.3)

<0.05

5 (7.3)

107 (±8.12)

4 (80.0)

<0.05

>10 years

29 (42.6)

78.2 (±8.94)

2 (6.9)

<0.05

4 (5.9)

75 (±5.88)

2 (50.0)

0.067b

Total

56 (100)

-

9 (16.1)

<0.01

12 (100)

-

7 (58.3)

<0.01

aWilcoxon test

bborderline value not quite significant (the t-test for paired data yielded a value of p <0.05, but it not suitable in comparison of small cases numbers)

BMTU Bone marrow transplant unit, DSU Day surgery unit

Discussion

Several small studies have suggested that liver biopsies should be considered as risky in pediatric patients with cancer or hematological disease [10] and that the morbidity and mortality of this procedure is higher in children than in adults [11, 12]. However, hepatopathy, which has a morbidity rate of 80 % and mortality rate close to 14 % in HSCT recipients, is a common complication in these patients [3]. Clinical and laboratory findings are non-specific in many of these cases and insufficient to make a definitive diagnosis.

Over the 3 years from April 2012 to September 2015, 57 liver biopsies were performed on 36 patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in our institution, which represents a more than 10-fold increase in the biopsy rate. The main reason for this dramatic jump is the increasing necessity of making histological-based diagnoses because of the availability of targeted therapies and the need to choose the optimal management strategy. One consequence of increasing our liver biopsy rate was that after April 2012, the only patient who developed Grade 3–4 hepatic GVHD had developed Grade 4 GVHD after receiving a donor lymphocyte infusion for cryptosporidiosis.

MRI quantification of liver iron concentration had not yet been introduced at the time our first two asymptomatic patients underwent liver biopsy to evaluate iron overload. These two children’s main laboratory abnormalities were in ferritin and ALP concentrations. Examination of their biopsies confirmed hepatic iron overload and showed a mild chronic GVHD. Because of the latter unexpected finding, all subsequent patients with at least one indicator of cholestasis (abnormally high concentrations of ALP and/or bile acids) underwent liver biopsy to determine whether subclinical GVHD was present. This policy resulted in histological confirmation of GVHD in 16 of 18 asymptomatic patients (88.89 %), the management of all of whom was modified accordingly. None of these patients showed any subsequent evidence of GVHD.

There were only a few complications in our series. Local bleeding and pain at the site of the needle insertion occurred in about 17 % of procedures (12 biopsies). There were only two major complications (2.9 %): a biliary tract infection and a hemothorax. The first biopsy had been performed in the DSU and the second in the BMTU. Both patients were in poor general condition, the former having Grade 4 GVHD and the latter having undergone three transplants.

Our results confirm the usefulness of liver biopsy and highlight that, in terms of complications, the procedure is as safe as other procedures routinely performed on such patients, such as lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspiration.

The change in location of the procedure from the DSU to the BMTU has not altered its safety. On the contrary, the rate of minor complications decreased from 25 to 16 % after this change, which is likely not a clinically significant difference considering how few patients had undergone the procedure in the DSU.

To date, little attention has been paid to the management of the emotional stress that can be experienced by young patients when they undergo invasive procedures such as liver biopsies. All of the patients who are referred to the BMTU have undergone many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, some of which have been invasive (such as bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture). During their long stays in the BMTU, these children develop close and trusting relationships with the inpatient team. Our findings demonstrate that when procedures are performed in the child’s room by a dedicated pediatrician, an intervention radiologist, and members of the day-to-day inpatient team, the patient is less afraid or agitated [13]. Moreover, use of midazolam for sedation reduces post-procedural anxiety because this drug has been shown to enhance anterograde amnesia in pediatric patients [14, 15].

When we analyzed the reports of behavioral status, we noticed that 84 % of the BMTU population were reported as being calm and collaborative prior to the procedure. Moreover, when we compared the behavioral status and the tachycardia events of patients treated in the DSU with those at the BMTU, we observed higher emotional distress with a higher incidence of tachycardia in those treated at the DSU, more of whom were assessed as agitated and non-cooperative. Indeed, 58.3 % of patients who underwent biopsies in the DSU were agitated or non-cooperative versus 16.1 % of those in the BMTU. Thus, our patients who underwent the procedure in their own rooms experienced less emotional distress than those who underwent it in the less familiar and friendly environment of the DSU, an important consideration for children.

Conclusions

In this small study, we found that liver biopsy is safe in pediatric patients who have undergone HSCT, few complications having been encountered. Moreover, our study shows that biopsies performed in the patient’s room can have the same outcomes as those performed in the DSU but are associated with better patient compliance and less emotional stress for the child, thus contributing significantly to a higher standard of care.

Abbreviations

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BMI, body mass index; BMTU, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit; DSU, Day Surgery Unit; GRE, gradient-recalled-echo; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HCST, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; INR, international normalized ratio; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PALS, Pediatric Advanced Life Support.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants for their support in this study. No grant support needs to be reported.

Funding

This work did not receive funding.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant materials are provided in the manuscript. All additional dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available at request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

MN acquired data, carried out data analysis, participated in figure and table preparation and drafted the manuscript. GM conceived of the study, drafted the manuscript and revised it critically. BF participated in drafting the manuscript, contributed to data collection and critical revision of article. PA performed the statistical analysis and interpretation of data and participated in figure and table preparation. SA performed the histological review of all tissue samples and contributed to data analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol (reference no. 1105/2015). Because of the retrospective character of the study, the ethical committee did not require any written informed consent. The parents of all subjects had given consent to the use of their clinical data at the time of admission in the BMTU.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
(2)
Department of Radiology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste
(4)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Turin
(5)
Department of Pathology, Ospedale Beato Papa Giovanni XXIII

References

  1. Forbes GM, Davies JM, Herrmann RP, Collins BJ. Liver disease complicating bone marrow transplantation: a clinical audit. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;10:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Matos H, Noruegas MJ, Goncalves I, Sanches C. Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42:1322–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. El-Shabrawi MH, El-Karaksy HM, Okahsa SH, Kamal NM, El-Batran G, Badr KA. Outpatient blind percutaneous liver biopsy in infants and children: is it safe? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:26–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams K, Thomson D, Seto I, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JP, Curtis S, et al. Standard 6: Age groups for pediatric trials. Pediatr. 2012;129 Suppl 3:S153–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gandon Y, Olivié D, Guyader D, Aubé C, Oberti F, Sebille V, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet. 2004;363:357–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ. 1974;2:656–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. JVIR. 2010;21:969–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiaretti A, Ruggiero A, Barbi E, Pierri F, Maurizi P, Fantacci C, et al. Comparison of propofol versus propofol ketamine combination in pediatric oncologic procedures performed by non-anesthesiologists. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:1163–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Park JH, Lim BG, Kim H, Lee IO, Kong MH, Kim NS. Comparison of Surgical Pleth Index–guided Analgesia with Conventional Analgesia Practices in Children. Anesthesiol. 2015;122:1280–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffer FA. Liver biopsy methods for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:481–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scheimann AO, Barrios JM, Al-Tawil YS, Gray KM, Gilger MA. Percutaneous liver biopsy in children: impact of ultrasonography and spring-loaded biopsy needles. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31:536–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lebensztejn DM, Kaczmarski M, Sobaniec-Lotowska M, Barwijuk-Machala M. Blind liver biopsy in children -- diagnostic significance and complications in authors’ own material. Med Sci Monit. 2000;6(6):1155–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Locasciulli A, Alberti A, de Bock R, Cordonnier C, Einsele H, Engelhard D, et al. Impact of liver disease and hepatitis infections on allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in Europe: a survey from the European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Group - Infectious Diseases Working Party. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1994;14(5):833–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell K, Torres L, Stayer S. Anesthesia and sedation outside the operating room. Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;32:25–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Twersky RS, Hartung J, Berger BJ, McClain J, Beaton C. Midazolam enhances anterograde but not retrograde amnesia in pediatric patients. Anesthesiol. 1993;78:51–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement