Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lifetime use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk: results from a prospective study of women with a sister with breast cancer

  • Sangmi Kim1Email author,
  • David L. Shore2,
  • Lauren E. Wilson3,
  • Ethel I. Sanniez2,
  • Jae H. Kim1,
  • Jack A. Taylor3 and
  • Dale P. Sandler3
BMC Cancer201515:960

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1979-1

Received: 26 February 2015

Accepted: 7 December 2015

Published: 16 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to inhibit several pathways in experimental models of breast carcinogenesis, but epidemiological evidence remains insufficient to support their use for breast cancer prevention. We examined the association between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk in a prospective cohort.

Methods

The Sister Study is a prospective cohort study of women who had a sister(s) with breast cancer. As of December 2013, 2118 incident breast cancers were ascertained from 50,884 women enrolled between 2003 and 2009. Lifetime history of NSAID use was estimated from self-reported data in pill-years, with 1 pill per week for a year equivalent to 1 pill-year. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer in relation to pill-years of use for different NSAIDs, with adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

In the full cohort, although there was some evidence that use of non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs was associated with lower breast cancer risk, there was little evidence of overall association for most categories of NSAID use. Among postmenopausal women NSAID use was not associated with reduced risk of breast cancer. However, among premenopausal women there was significantly reduced risk for any NSAID (HR4vs1 = 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.50–0.87) and specifically for aspirin (HR4vs1 = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.33–0.98), with small, but non-significant reductions in risk for other drug classes.

Conclusion

Women with a sister with breast cancer are themselves at increased risk and might benefit the most from chemoprevention. Although there was little evidence of protective effect from NSAIDs in the overall cohort of women or among the subset who are postmenopausal, there is intriguing evidence that NSAID use, particularly aspirin, may reduce risk among premenopausal women.

Keywords

Breast cancer Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Chemoprevention Family history Risk factor heterogeneity

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a class of drugs commonly used to treat pain, fever and inflammation [1]. Based on their long-term safety and preliminary efficacy data, there has been interest in aspirin and other NSAIDs as possible candidates for breast cancer prevention [2]. NSAIDs exert pharmacological effects primarily by blocking cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme activity to suppress the prostaglandin synthesis pathway [1, 3]. COX-independent effects of NSAIDs have been described, but the chemopreventive potential of NSAIDs is thought to be closely related to their inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme [4]. Overexpression of COX-2 has been implicated in various processes related to breast carcinogenesis such as inhibition of apoptosis, promotion of angiogenesis, and impairment of immune surveillance [3]. Notably, upregulation of PGE2, the most abundant COX-2—derived prostaglandin [5], can also induce CYP19 transcription and increase aromatase activity, leading to increased estrogen production in mammary adipose tissue [6].

Numerous epidemiologic studies have investigated the relation between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer. Although previous meta-analyses have suggested a modest reduction in breast cancer risk in relation to use of aspirin and other NSAIDs [7, 8], a randomized clinical trial of low dose aspirin [9] and recent analyses of large cohort studies [10, 11] do not support a protective association. Moreover, results concerning the influence of frequency, duration or types of NSAIDs are largely inconsistent even within studies that found an inverse association between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer [1215]. Assessment and quantification of NSAID use are challenging in epidemiologic studies. Except for a few studies based on healthcare databases which have their own limitation in assessing over-the-counter NSAIDs [16, 17], information on use of NSAIDs is collected using questionnaires that vary across studies, possibly accounting for inconsistent results.

To further clarify the role of NSAID use in breast cancer prevention, we examined the association between lifetime use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk in a large prospective cohort of women with a sister with breast cancer.

Methods

Sister study

The Sister Study (NCT00047970) is a prospective cohort of 50,884 women aged 35–74 years who had a sister with breast cancer but who did not have breast cancer themselves [18, 19]. They were recruited through various sources across the United States and Puerto Rico between 2003 and 2009. Eligible participants completed a telephone interview that sought information on reproductive and medical history, environmental and occupational exposures, and a number of lifestyle factors, and completed a home visit during which blood and other biological and environmental specimens were collected and height, weight, waist circumference and blood pressure were measured. Participants are followed annually to update contact information and report diagnosis of selected medical conditions including breast cancer. Participants complete a more comprehensive questionnaire about changes in exposures and health status every 2–3 years. Response rates over time have been consistently high; 92 % of participants completed their most recent scheduled follow-up activity (annual update or comprehensive questionnaire). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH and the Copernicus Group Institutional Review Board, and all participating women gave written informed consent.

Assessment of NSAID use

Information on NSAID use was obtained during the baseline interview in multiple ways. Prior to telephone interview, study participants were given a medications booklet listing common medications and were told to use them as a reference to identify specific medications that they used. During the computer assisted telephone interview, participants were first asked about medications used for 25 major health conditions including some for which NSAIDs may be indicated (e.g. several cardiovascular diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and migraines). Participants were asked the total number of years they took any medication for a specific condition and the names of each medication currently taken at least once a week for that condition. For each medication reported they were asked to report the age at first use, the number of days per week, times per day on days they took it, and total years or months of use. If the medications reported did not span at least half of the interval between first use of medicine for a condition and the date of interview, participants were asked for similar information for the medication they took for that condition for the longest time. Participants were also asked about any medications they were currently taking at least once a week that were not covered in the medical history section of the questionnaire. Finally, participants were asked if they had ever taken any pain or inflammation medications at least three times a week for 3 months in a row or longer that might not have been reported elsewhere in the interview. Again, participants were asked to report age at first use, whether they had used it regularly in the past 12 months, how many days per week they usually took the medication, and how many times a day they took the medication on days that they used it.

Each reported medication was coded by product and class using the Slone Drug Dictionary [20]. Products that contained more than one active ingredient were assigned multiple class codes. We grouped aspirin, acetyl salicylate and products containing these drugs as “aspirin”, and grouped celecoxib, rofecoxib and valdecoxib as selective COX-2 inhibitors (COXibs). We used the term non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs to denote NSAIDs that did not belong to either the aspirin or the COXibs group. These included agents such as proprionic acids (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen), indole (e.g., sulindac) and enolic acids (e.g., piroxicam). Aspirin, COXibs and non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs are collectively referred to as NSAIDs.

Using the detailed medication use histories provided, we constructed age-specific calendar grids for use of each specified NSAID. Total years of use for each subgroup of NSAIDs were computed by summing across the occupied ages in the calendar grid. To quantify lifetime use of NSAIDs, the frequency of use during the period was entered into the corresponding age grids and pill-years of use were computed as a product of frequency and years of use, where one pill-year represents use of one pill per week for a year.

Documentation of breast cancer diagnosis

Participants have been followed through 2013 with an average of 5.3 years of follow-up. As of December 26, 2013, a breast cancer diagnosis was documented in 2118 women in the cohort, with an average time to diagnosis of 3.2 years. Women who report a new breast cancer diagnosis were contacted 6 months after diagnosis for additional information about their diagnosis and treatment and asked to authorize release of pertinent medical records. To date, pathology reports or complete medical records have been obtained for 77 % of self-reported breast cancers (N = 1638). Because of high agreement between self-reports and medical records (from 91.5 % for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] status to 99.5 % for any breast cancer diagnosis, invasive breast cancer, and estrogen receptor positive [ER+] invasive cancer), we retained self-reported breast cancers in this analysis.

Data analysis

Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between lifetime use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk. Pill-years of NSAID use was categorized into 4 groups: <0.75 pill-years (equivalent to less than 3 pills/week for 3 months); 0.75- < 14 pill-years; 14- < 49 pill-years; and ≥ 49 pill-years to reflect similar levels of frequency and duration of use that were used to define use of NSAIDs in previous studies [21, 22]. The highest exposure category can be achieved in several ways, including by taking 1 NSAID pill/day for 7 years or by taking 1 pill/week for 49 years. The primary time scale was age, and women were delay-entered into risk sets (left-truncated) beginning at the age when they completed baseline activities. Person-time accrued until date of diagnosis for incident breast cancers, or the most current follow-up questionnaire completion date for the rest of the cohort who were up to date in their follow-up cycle. Women who did not respond to their most recent eligible health update were censored at the earliest date among final non-response, death, or the midpoint of the interval between the last completed health update and the end of the window of eligibility for responding to their first skipped health update. Visual inspection did not suggest that the proportionality assumption was violated. Evaluation of interaction terms with a logarithmic function of time added to the Cox model further supported the proportionality assumption.

Models were adjusted for variables selected using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) analysis. Briefly, we postulated that “health consciousness” and “pain” were two immediate, but unmeasured, factors leading to use of NSAIDs, and considered variables that were related with breast cancer risk and at least one of the unmeasured variables, as potential confounders. The final adjusted models included: race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white; black; Hispanic; or others), level of education (high school graduate or less; some colleges or associate degree; or college degree or higher), history of benign proliferative breast disease (fibrocystic/benign changes; fibroadenoma; proliferative changes; or ductal/lobular hyperplasia), number of 1st degree family members with breast cancer (1; 2; or ≥ 3), BMI (<18.5; 18.5–24.9; 25–29.9; 30–34.9; 35–39.9; or ≥ 40 kg/m2), time since the last mammogram (<1 year; 1–< 2 years; or ≥ 2 years) and age at 1st term birth (<24y; 24–29y; ≥ 30y; or nulliparous). Additional adjustment for years of oral contraceptive use, alcohol intake, current physical activity and years of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use did not change the results from the specified multivariable models (Additional file 1: Table S1).

In addition to an analysis including all incident breast cancers, we conducted a priori subgroup analyses by tumor characteristics by treating tumor occurrences that were assigned to types not under consideration as censoring events. Specifically, we evaluated whether an association with NSAID use might vary between invasive versus in situ tumors, or according to estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status. Prespecified (menopausal status, BMI and number of 1st degree family members with breast cancer) and data-driven post hoc (parity and age at first birth) subgroup analyses were also performed. Differences in the HRs between levels of these factors were evaluated by testing for multiplicative interactions or for homogeneity of trends on exposure categories as an ordinal variable. Significance tests were two-sided with the level of significance at 0.05. Stata 12.1 (College Station, TX) was used for all analyses.

Results

Approximately 11 % of premenopausal women and 21 % of postmenopausal women had at least 49 pill-years of NSAID use in their lifetime (Table 1). High NSAID use was associated with older age, non-Hispanic white race and higher BMI. History of benign proliferative breast disease and other medical conditions managed with NSAIDs was more common among the high NSAID user group. Among premenopausal women, the high NSAID users were also more likely to be current smokers.
Table 1

Characteristics of study participants according to NSAID use and menopause status, the Sister Study (2003-2013)

 

All

Premenopausal women

Postmenopausal women

Lifetime use of NSAIDs

 

< 49 pill-yearsa

≥ 49 pill-yearsa

< 49 pill-yearsa

≥ 49 pill-yearsa

No.

50,883

16,311

1960

25,590

6860

Mean (SD)

 Age, y

55.2 (9.0)

46.4 (5.2)

48.3 (5.0)

59.6 (6.8)

61.5 (6.6)

 BMI, kg/m2

27.8 (6.3)

27.3 (6.3)

29.2 (7.2)

27.7 (6.0)

29.1 (6.7)

 Had alcoholic drinks, days/week

1.5 (2.1)

1.4 (1.9)

1.5 (2.0)

1.6 (2.2)

1.6 (2.3)

 Age at menarche, y

12.6 (1.5)

12.8 (1.5)

12.6 (1.6)

12.6 (1.5)

12.5 (1.5)

 Duration of HRT use, y

3.8 (6.6)

0.4 (1.7)

0.8 (2.8)

5.3 (7.3)

7.2 (8.1)

No. (%)

 Non-Hispanic white

42,558 (83.7)

12,931 (80.1)

16,480 (85.5)

21,490 (84.0)

6190 (90.3)

 Having ≥ college degree

25,886 (50.9)

9090 (55.8)

956 (48.8)

12,505 (48.9)

3244 (47.8)

 Current smokers

4175 (8.2)

1424 (8.7)

254 (13.0)

1974 (7.7)

510 (7.4)

 Nulliparity

9207 (18.1)

3365 (20.6)

478 (21.9)

4240 (16.6)

1143 (16.7)

 Current use of HRT

5276 (10.4)

536 (3.3)

136 (7.0)

3478 (13.7)

1111 (16.3)

 Having ≥ 2 first degree family members with breast cancer

13,275 (27.0)

3544 (21.7)

406 (23.8)

6836 (26.7)

1893 (27.6)

 History of benign proliferative breast diseaseb

1842 (3.6)

642 (3.9)

99 (5.1)

827 (3.2)

240 (3.5)

 Prior diagnosis of major medical conditionsc

16,408 (32.3)

4464 (27.4)

920 (46.9)

7837 (30.6)

3129 (45.6)

 Having a mammogram within a year

40,928 (81.4)

12,695 (79.7)

1537 (79.4)

20,857 (82)

5712 (83.6)

aOne pill-year is equivalent to taking 1 pill per week for 1 year

bDiagnosis of fibrocystic or benign changes, fibroadenoma, proliferative changes, ductal or lobular hyperplasia

cMedical conditions associated with use of NSAIDs including angina, heart attack, stroke, ischemic heart attack, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine and scoliosis

There were no significant associations between use of any NSAID and breast cancer risk, when analyzing duration and frequency separately (Table 2). However, for pill-years of NSAID use, which is a combined measure of duration and frequency, the highest category of non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs was associated with reduced risk compared to the lowest category (multivariable-adjusted HR = 0.84, 95 % CI: 0.71–0.99). Neither pill-years of aspirin nor pill-years of COXibs were inversely associated with breast cancer risk. Results were similar for low- and regular-dose aspirin use and these were not evaluated separately in subsequent analyses.
Table 2

Lifetime use of different NSAIDs and breast cancer risk according to duration, average frequency and pill-yearsa of use, the Sister Study (2003–2013)

 

Cases

HR (95 % CI)b

 

Cases

HR (95 % CI)b

 

Cases

HR (95 % CI)b

Aspirin

Duration of use, y

Frequency of use, per week

Pill-years of use, py

<5

1830

1. (Ref.)

No use

1483

1. (Ref.)

<0.75

1489

1. (Ref.)

5- < 10

132

0.83 (0.69–1.02)

<4

71

0.87 (0.68–1.13)

0.75- < 14

191

1.09 (0.94–1.28)

10- < 20

97

0.95 (0.76–1.19)

4- < 7

82

1.14 (0.9–1.43)

14- < 49

266

0.97 (0.85–1.11)

≥ 20

59

0.93 (0.70–1.24)

≥ 7

481

1.07 (0.95–1.21)

≥ 49

172

0.95 (0.81–1.12)

P c

 

0.386

P c

 

0.202

P c

 

0.593

Low dose aspirin

Duration of use, y

Frequency of use, per week

Pill-years of use, py

<1

1978

1. (Ref.)

No use

1708

1. (Ref.)

<0.75

1711

1. (Ref.)

1- < 5

90

0.86 (0.72–1.11)

<7

61

0.99 (0.76–1.29)

0.75- < 21

203

1.07 (0.92–1.24)

≥ 5

50

0.88 (0.65–1.2)

≥ 7

349

1.05 (0.91–1.2)

≥ 21

204

0.93 (0.8–1.08)

P c

 

0.240

P c

 

0.539

P c

 

0.541

Regular strength aspirin

Duration of use, y

Frequency of use, per week

Pill-years of use, py

<1

1965

1. (Ref.)

No use

1866

1. (Ref.)

<0.75

1870

1. (Ref.)

1- < 5

45

0.76 (0.55–1.06)

<7

94

0.99 (0.77–1.26)

0.75- < 21

92

0.98 (0.79–1.21)

≥ 5

108

0.98 (0.77–1.25)

≥ 7

156

1.12 (0.92–1.36)

≥ 21

156

1.03 (0.87–1.22)

P c

 

0.726

P c

 

0.590

P c

 

0.775

COXibs d

Duration of use, y

Frequency of use, per week

Pill-years of use, py

<1

1954

1. (Ref.)

No use

1901

1. (Ref.)

<0.75

1904

1. (Ref.)

1- < 5

134

1.06 (0.76–1.43)

<7

42

1.19 (0.82–1.72)

0.75- < 21

139

1.05 (0.88–1.25)

≥ 5

30

0.71 (0.46–1.09)

≥ 7

175

0.95 (0.73–1.24)

≥ 21

75

0.86 (0.68–1.09)

P c

 

0.205

P c

 

0.590

P c

 

0.431

Non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs

Duration of use, y

Frequency of use, per week

Pill-years of use, py

<5

1845

1. (Ref.)

No use

1462

1. (Ref.)

No use

1470

1. (Ref.)

5- < 10

128

1.05 (0.86–1.28)

<4

156

1.04 (0.87–1.26)

<4

248

0.94 (0.85–1.11)

10- < 20

99

0.85 (0.7–1.06)

4- < 7

130

1.13 (0.93–1.37)

4- < 7

241

1.02 (0.89–1.17)

≥ 20

46

0.92 (0.68–1.25)

≥ 7

369

0.90 (0.79–1.02)

≥ 7

159

0.84 (0.71–0.99)

P c

 

0.260

P c

 

0.144

P c

 

0.130

aOne pill-year is equivalent to taking 1 pill per week for 1 year

bAdjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white; black; Hispanic; or others), level of education (high school graduate or less; some colleges or associate degree; or college degree or higher), history of benign proliferative breast disease (fibrocystic/benign changes; fibroadenoma; proliferative changes; or ductal/lobular hyperplasia), number of 1st degree family members with breast cancer (1; 2; or ≥ 3), BMI (<18.5; 18.5–24.9; 25–29.9; 30–34.9; 35–39.9; or ≥ 40 kg/m2), age at 1st term birth (<24y; 24–29y; ≥ 30y; or nulliparous), time since the last mammogram (<1 year; 1- < 2 years; or ≥ 2 years) and menopause status at diagnosis; duration and frequency of use were mutually adjusted

cP for linear trend

dSelective COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib, rofecoxib or valdecoxib

Approximately 26 % of all incident breast cancers were in situ tumors, and of the remaining invasive cases, 1203 women were diagnosed at stages I or II, and 216 women were diagnosed at later stages (stage III or IV). Associations with NSAID use did not differ among in situ tumors, localized and advanced breast cancers (Additional file 1: Table S2). Invasive breast cancers were also categorized based on ER, PR and HER2 status (Table 3). In situ tumors were not included in this analysis because they are not routinely evaluated for these molecular markers. The majority (75 %) of invasive cancers were ER+/PR+/HER2-, followed by ER-/PR-/HER2- (11 %) and ER+/PR+/HER2+ (10 %). There were too few ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors to evaluate (N = 53). There was an indication of inverse associations between long-term regular use of any NSAIDs and ER+/PR+ breast cancer regardless of HER2 status. While most associations were not statistically significant, there was a significant inverse trend for increasing pill years of non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs and ER+/PR+/HER2- breast cancer (p = 0.039). The relationship between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk did not vary by degree of family history of breast cancer or BMI (data not shown).
Table 3

Associations between pill-yearsa of NSAID use and invasive breast cancer by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status, the Sister Study (2003–2013)

 

No. Cases

HR (95 % CI)c

No. Cases

HR (95 % CI)c

No. Cases

HR (95 % CI)c

 

ER+/PR+/HER2-

ER+/PR+/HER2+

ER-/PR-/HER2-

Use of any NSAIDs, py

 <0.75

467

1. (Ref.)

64

1. (Ref.)

56

1. (Ref.)

 0.75- < 14

156

1.05 (0.88–1.27)

15

0.72 (0.41–1.26)

26

1.40 (0.87–2.24)

 14- < 49

194

0.94 (0.79–1.11)

28

0.96 (0.61–1.51)

28

1.20 (0.76–1.90)

 ≥ 49

171

0.85 (0.7–1.01)

25

0.87 (0.54–1.4)

26

1.22 (0.75–1.97)

 P for trend

 

0.073

 

0.624

 

0.374

Aspirin, py

 <0.75

682

1. (Ref.)

97

1. (Ref.)

95

1. (Ref.)

 0.75- < 14

102

1.25 (1.01–1.54)

8

0.68 (0.33–1.41)

17

1.07 (0.57–2.01)

 14- < 49

118

0.89 (0.73–1.09)

16

0.85 (0.5–1.47)

22

1.43 (0.88–2.3)

 ≥ 49

86

0.97 (0.77–1.22)

11

0.9 (0.47–1.7)

11

1.15 (0.61–2.19)

 P for trend

 

0.569

 

0.501

 

0.261

COXibsb, py

 <0.75

890

1. (Ref.)

118

1. (Ref.)

122

1. (Ref.)

 0.75- < 21

67

1.06 (0.83–1.36)

8

0.92 (0.45–1.89)

11

1.36 (0.73–2.53)

 ≥ 21

31

0.74 (0.51–1.06)

6

1.02 (0.44–2.33)

6

1.16 (0.51–2.66)

 P for trend

 

0.238

 

0.942

 

0.44

Non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs, py

 <0.75

703

1. (Ref.)

89

1. (Ref.)

93

1. (Ref.)

 0.75- < 14

112

0.93 (0.76–1.13)

19

1.17 (0.71–1.93)

21

1.25 (0.77–2.03)

 14- < 49

96

0.84 (0.68–1.05)

14

0.9 (0.51–1.59)

14

0.93 (0.53–1.63)

 ≥ 49

77

0.83 (0.65–1.05)

10

0.77 (0.4–1.5)

11

0.94 (0.44–1.77)

 P for trend

 

0.039

 

0.503

 

0.892

aOne pill-year is equivalent to taking 1 pill per week for 1 year

bSelective COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib, rofecoxib or valdecoxib

cAdjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white; black; Hispanic; or others), level of education (high school graduate or less; some colleges or associate degree; or college degree or higher), history of benign proliferative breast disease (fibrocystic/benign changes; fibroadenoma; proliferative changes; or ductal/lobular hyperplasia), number of 1st degree family members with breast cancer (1; 2; or ≥ 3), BMI (<18.5; 18.5–24.9; 25–29.9; 30–34.9; 35–39.9; or ≥ 40 kg/m2), age at 1st term birth (<24y; 24–29y; ≥ 30y; or nulliparous), time since the last mammogram (<1 year; 1- < 2 years; or ≥ 2 years) and menopause status at diagnosis

In contrast to results for postmenopausal women, lifetime use of NSAIDs was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (Table 4). The multivariable-adjusted HRs for the highest versus the lowest category of pill-years of NSAID use were 0.66 (95 % CI: 0.50–0.87) among premenopausal women versus 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.82–1.09) among postmenopausal women. The heterogeneous associations between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk by menopause status were most apparent for aspirin (p for homogeneity of trends = 0.038): The HRs associated with the highest category of pill-years of aspirin use were 0.57 (95 % CI: 0.33–0.98) in premenopausal women and 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.87–1.23) among postmenopausal women. Although results were not statistically significant, the inverse associations with the highest category of pill-years of use of COXibs and other non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs also tended to be more evident among premenopausal women.
Table 4

Associations between pill-yearsa of NSAID use and breast cancer by menopause status, the Sister Study (2003-2013)

 

No. Cases

HR (95 % CI)c

No. Cases

HR (95 % CI)c

P for test of homogeneity of trends

 

Premenopausal women

Postmenopausal women

 

Use of any NSAIDs, py

    

0.091

 <0.75

431

1. (Ref.)

576

1. (Ref.)

 

 0.75- < 14

91

0.84 (0.67–1.05)

220

1.07 (0.92–1.25)

 

 14- < 49

113

1.03 (0.83–1.27)

329

1.05 (0.91–1.20

 

 ≥ 49

60

0.66 (0.50–0.87)

298

0.95 (0.82–1.09)

 

 P for trend

 

0.025

 

0.641

 

Aspirin, py

    

0.038

 <0.75

606

1. (Ref.)

883

1. (Ref.)

 

 0.75- < 14

35

0.81 (0.58–1.14)

156

1.21 (1.02–1.44)

 

 14- < 49

40

0.91 (0.66–1.25)

226

1.00 (0.86–1.16)

 

 ≥ 49

14

0.57 (0.33–0.98)

158

1.03 (0.87–1.23)

 

 P for trend

 

0.038

 

0.654

 

COXibsb, py

    

0.200

 <0.75

659

1. (Ref.)

1245

1. (Ref.)

 

 0.75- < 21

27

0.88 (0.60–1.30

112

1.09 (0.90–1.32)

 

 ≥ 21

9

0.62 (0.32–1.22)

66

0.91 (0.71–1.17)

 

 P for trend

 

0.141

 

0.812

 

Non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs, py

    

0.508

 <0.75

497

1. (Ref.)

973

1. (Ref.)

 

 0.75- < 14

78

0.93 (0.73–1.18)

170

1.00 (0.85–1.18)

 

 14- < 49

79

1.04 (0.82–1.33)

162

1.00 (0.85–1.19)

 

 ≥ 49

41

0.73 (0.53–1.01)

118

0.87 (0.72–1.06)

 

 P for trend

 

0.182

 

0.314

 

aOne pill-year is equivalent to taking 1 pill per week for 1 year

bSelective COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib, rofecoxib or valdecoxib

cAdjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white; black; Hispanic; or others), level of education (high school graduate or less; some colleges or associate degree; or college degree or higher), history of benign proliferative breast disease (fibrocystic/benign changes; fibroadenoma; proliferative changes; or ductal/lobular hyperplasia), number of 1st degree family members with breast cancer (1; 2; or ≥ 3), BMI (<18.5; 18.5–24.9; 25–29.9; 30–34.9; 35–39.9; or ≥ 40 kg/m2), time since the last mammogram (<1 year; 1- < 2 years; or ≥ 2 years) and age at 1st term birth (<24y; 24–29y; ≥ 30y; or nulliparous)

Several exploratory analyses were conducted to better understand the unexpected subgroup finding. First, our analysis used age as the time scale for calculating HRs rather than time since enrollment, based on the results from a simulation study of different time scales in Cox regression analysis [23]. Since women were required to be breast cancer free at enrollment, those who enrolled at later ages could have a lower hazard than those of the same age who were enrolled at younger ages [24]. However, additional adjustment for age at study entry had negligible impact on the risk estimates for pre- and post-menopausal women.

Second, median pill-years of NSAID use were lower for premenopausal than for postmenopausal women (18.7 vs 28 years). To make the analyses in the two groups more comparable, we further divided the highest category of NSAID use (≥21 pill-years for COXibs and ≥ 49 pill-years for other types of NSAIDs) into two groups using the median among postmenopausal women (not shown), but the association with breast cancer risk remained unchanged (HR for ≥ 91 versus <0.75 pill-years of NSAID use = 1.01, p = 0.89 in postmenopausal women). We also examined breast cancer risk in relation to pill-years of NSAID use within the past 5 years (Additional file 1: Table S3). Again, the results were similar, suggesting an inverse, albeit not significant, association between use of different NSAIDs and breast cancer risk only among premenopausal women (HR for ≥ 14 versus <0.75 pill-years of NSAID use = 0.84, p = 0.09 in premenopausal women vs. 1.02, p = 0.78 in postmenopausal women). Third, separate analysis, stratified by menopause status at study follow-up, was conducted because 46 % of premenopausal women at baseline (including 30 % of premenopausal women who developed breast cancer) became postmenopausal by the end of study follow-up. This analysis did not affect the lack of the association among postmenopausal women: the HRs for the highest pill-years of aspirin were 0.55 (95 % CI: 0.24–1.23) vs 0.99 (95 % CI:0.83–1.17) for those who were premenopausal versus postmenopausal at follow-up (p for homogeneity of trends =0.067).

Lastly, we performed post-hoc analysis to explore the influence of other reproductive factors. Results stratified by parity suggested stronger inverse associations between high pill-years of non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAID use and breast cancer risk among nulliparous premenopausal women compared with among parous premenopausal women (p for interaction = 0.081; Additional file 1: Table S4). The inverse association between high pill-years of NSAID use and breast cancer risk was also more evident among premenopausal women who had not given birth by the age of 30, except for use of COXibs, but there were only a few women with incident breast cancer in this exploratory subgroup analysis. In postmenopausal women, we did not find evidence that these reproductive events modified the relationship between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk.

Discussion

In this analysis of a prospective study of women with a sister with breast cancer, lifetime use of NSAIDs generally did not reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. However, among premenopausal women, our results suggest that lifetime use of different NSAIDs, particularly aspirin, may be associated with reduced breast cancer risk.

A wealth of experimental data supports the chemopreventive potential of NSAIDs. Although the mechanistic pathways are not well established, the primary mechanism appears to involve suppression of COX-2-PGE2 signaling, which can modulate cellular proliferation, survival and migration, and impair tumor immunosurveillance through multiple signaling pathways [3]. COX-2-PGE2 signaling has been directly implicated in breast cancer. Targeted overexpression of the COX-2 gene sufficiently induced mammary carcinogenesis and COX-2 inhibition reduced the incidence and extent of breast tumors in breast cancer animal models. [2527]. PGE2 can also upregulate aromatase expression in stromal fat cells in the breast and consequently increase local estrogen production, suggesting that NSAIDs may be especially protective for ER+ breast cancer [28, 29]. However, there is also evidence from animal studies for the role of COX-2 in the development of ER- and HER2+ breast cancer through activation of Akt pathway [30].

There is yet insufficient epidemiological evidence to draw conclusions about the role of NSAIDs in breast cancer risk [2]. Overall, results of recent meta-analyses have concluded that aspirin and other NSAIDs might provide a slight reduction in breast cancer risk [7, 8, 31], but the inverse association tends to be more evident in case–control studies than in cohort studies [10, 15, 17, 3234] or in the single randomized controlled trial of low-dose aspirin [9]. Although our study found some evidence that breast cancer risk was reduced among women with the highest lifetime use of non-aspirin, non-COXib NSAIDs, this finding was only significant when we categorized by pill-years of use and appears in association with tumors that are ER+/PR+/HER2-. In general, our findings are consistent with the previous prospective studies that did not support overall benefits of NSAID use for breast cancer prevention.

Some studies have suggested subgroup effects according to tumor and population characteristics. A stronger inverse association with NSAID use has been found for ER+ breast cancer in some [14, 35] but not all studies [12, 22, 3638]. The limited available data, including ours, do not support different associations by HER2 status [38, 39]. An extended follow-up analysis of randomized clinical trials has suggested that daily aspirin use may reduce cancer mortality by reducing the incidence of metastatic cancer [40]. We are not yet able to study breast cancer mortality in our cohort. However, associations with use of NSAIDs were similar for in situ, localized and advanced breast cancer in our study.

Menopause status is considered an important effect modifier of several known breast cancer risk factors [41, 42]. We therefore evaluated the association between lifetime use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk by menopause status and observed a protective association between high lifetime use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk only among premenopausal women. Consistent with our findings, Zhang et al. reported that the odds ratios for regular use of NSAIDs were 0.62 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.94) among premenopausal women, but 0.90 (95 % CI: 0.69–1.16) in postmenopausal women in a large case–control study [22]. However, regular use of aspirin was similarly inversely associated with breast cancer regardless of menopause status in the Black Women’s Health Study [43], and no relationship between NSAID use and breast cancer was found among premenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study II [11]. Reasons for the inconsistent findings are difficult to pinpoint, but it is notable that our prospective study shares marked similarities to Zhang’s study [22] in terms of the assessment of NSAID use, where histories of medications were obtained through questions about an extensive list of major indications, and then detailed information for each episode of use was recorded. On the other hand, regular use (≥2 or ≥3 times per week) of aspirin and other NSAIDs was ascertained based on the baseline questionnaires, and the duration of use was estimated based on the responses to the same questions in each follow-up questionnaire in the aforementioned prospective cohort studies [11, 43].

We found that the protective association with NSAID use among premenopausal women was primarily restricted to the highest exposure category of 49 pill-years of NSAID use. The pill-year measure combines frequency and duration so the same number of pill-years can be derived from different combinations of frequency and duration of use, analogous to pack-years of smoking, a commonly used exposure measure. To address the possibility that older women may achieve the highest category by having more years of use but lower frequency of use, we further investigated the association between pill-years of NSAID use and breast cancer risk after dividing the highest exposure category into two groups (< 91 or ≥91 pill years). However, the HRs did not vary in the two strata.

Another possible explanation for the observed difference may lie in the interaction between NSAIDs and timing of exposure. The development of human breast tissue progresses over the lifespan, and menopause represents one lifecycle event associated with lobular involution and decrease in glandular or dense parenchymal features. Because hormone responsiveness and cell proliferation are the highest in the undifferentiated lobules [4446], chemopreventive agents like NSAIDs may be more effective during the period susceptible to tumorigenesis. In the same context, we also evaluated other reproductive events affecting breast development such as parity and age at first term pregnancy. Our exploratory analysis suggested that premenopausal women who were nulliparous or did not give birth before age 30 years old might have greater benefit from lifetime use of NSAIDs. Further studies are necessary to determine whether women’s reproductive history can be used to inform clinical effectiveness of aspirin or other types of NSAIDs on breast cancer prevention.

Strengths of the present study include its prospective design, the large sample size and detailed information on potential risk factors for breast cancer. We also were able to characterize lifetime use of NSAIDs based on comprehensive questionnaire data about both medical history and medication use. In addition to questions about the general use of pain and inflammation medications, participants could report NSAID use in connection with medical histories, which included questions about all medications used in relation to 25 specific health conditions, and as part of a listing of any other medications that were currently being taken or were used within 1 year of enrollment. Despite various approaches (e.g., query of NSAID use prompted by specific medical conditions and visual cue cards for medications) used to improve the accuracy of recall, however, some nondifferential measurement error is unavoidable and is hard to quantify.

A few other issues concerning the interpretation of our study need to be discussed. First, we defined lifetime NSAID use based on the information collected at baseline and did not include information on changes in NSAID use during the study follow-up. However, given the relatively short time to breast cancer diagnosis in our study, it seems unlikely that change in NSAID use pattern is sufficiently large to influence the association between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk. Second, the present study involves multiple exposure and outcome measures, and the resulting larger number of statistical tests may have yielded spurious associations. Although the subgroup analyses were guided by biological plausibility and conducted in order to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the relationship between use of NSAIDs and breast cancer risk, findings from the subgroup analyses should be interpreted with caution. Lastly, our study population is unique in that all women had a sister with breast cancer at the time of enrollment. Because women with a family history of breast cancer on average have a 2–4 fold increased risk of developing breast cancer [47], women with an affected sister are a priority population for chemoprevention strategies. At the same time, the increased breast cancer risk in our cohort compared to the general population may also raise concern about potential lack of generalizability of findings. However, this increased risk is not due solely to rare high penetrance genes, but rather to possibly increased frequency of the same polymorphisms and environmental risk factors that affect most women. In fact, the prevalence of high penetrance breast cancer genes in our cohort was <1 % among those tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Women in our study were similar to the general population in terms of prevalence of obesity, physical activity and other healthy lifestyle behaviors [48].

Conclusion

In this analysis of more than 50,000 women at higher risk of breast cancer on the basis of family history, there was little evidence that use of NSAIDs can protect against breast cancer. However, among premenopausal women, use of NSAIDs, particularly aspirin, was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, raising the intriguing hypothesis of chemopreventive benefit for this subgroup of at-risk women.

Abbreviations

CIs: 

Confidence intervals

COX: 

Cyclooxygenase

DAG: 

Directed acyclic graph

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

HR: 

Hazard ratio

HER2: 

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

NSAIDs: 

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PR: 

Progesterone Receptor

PGE2

Prostaglandin E2

COXibs: 

Selective COX-2 inhibitors

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Katie O’Brien and Honglei Chen for their thoughtful review of this manuscript.

Grant support

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01 ES044005).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical College of Georgia, Department of Medicine—Section of Hematology/Oncology, Augusta University GRU Cancer Center
(2)
Westat
(3)
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health

References

  1. Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis (part I). JNCI Cancer Spectr. 1998;90(20):1529–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuzick J, DeCensi A, Arun B, Brown PH, Castiglione M, Dunn B, et al. Preventive therapy for breast cancer: A consensus statement. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):496–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang D, Dubois RN. Eicosanoids and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(3):181–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis (Part II). JNCI Cancer Spectr. 1998;90(21):1609–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Park JY, Pillinger MH, Abramson SB. Prostaglandin E2 synthesis and secretion: The role of PGE2 synthases. Clin Immunol. 2006;119(3):229–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. DuBois RN. Aspirin and breast cancer prevention: The estrogen connection. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2488–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takkouche B, Regueira-Mendez C, Etminan M. Breast cancer and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(20):1439–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo T, Yan HM, He P, Luo Y, Yang YF, Zheng H. Aspirin use and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):581–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook NR, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, et al. Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: The Women’s Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(1):47–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang X, Smith-Warner SA, Collins LC, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Use of aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen and postmenopausal breast cancer incidence. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(28):3468–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Eliassen AH, Chen WY, Spiegelman D, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE. Use of aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):115–21. discussion 121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bardia A, Olson JE, Vachon CM, Lazovich D, Vierkant RA, Wang AH, et al. Effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs on postmenopausal breast cancer incidence by hormone receptor status: Results from a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(1):149–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brasky TM, Bonner MR, Moysich KB, Ambrosone CB, Nie J, Tao MH, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and breast cancer risk in the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(9):1503–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gierach G, Lacey J, Schatzkin A, Leitzmann M, Richesson D, Hollenbeck A, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(2):R38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gill JK, Maskarinec G, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk: The multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(10):1150–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronin-Fenton DP, Pedersen L, Lash TL, Friis S, Baron JA, Sorensen HT. Prescriptions for selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and risk of breast cancer in a population-based case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(2):R15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A. Risk of breast cancer among users of aspirin and other anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:525–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Nichols HB, DeRoo LA, Scharf DR, Sandler DP. Risk-benefit profiles of women using tamoxifen for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(1):354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Umbach DM, Sandler DP. Using risk-based sampling to enrich cohorts for endpoints, genes, and exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(4):447–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelley K, Kelley T, Kaufman D, Mitchell A. The slone drug dictionary: A research driven pharmacoepidemiology tool. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12 Suppl 1:S168–9.Google Scholar
  21. Harris RE, Chlebowski RT, Jackson RD, Frid DJ, Ascenseo JL, Anderson G, et al. Breast cancer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Prospective results from the women’s health initiative. Cancer Res. 2003;63(18):6096–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang Y, Coogan PF, Palmer JR, Strom BL, Rosenberg L. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of breast cancer: The case-control surveillance study revisited. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(2):165–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thiebaut AC, Benichou J. Choice of time-scale in Cox’s model analysis of epidemiologic cohort data: A simulation study. Stat Med. 2004;23(24):3803–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pencina MJ, Larson MG, D’Agostino RB. Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies. Stat Med. 2007;26(6):1343–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Subbaramaiah K, Howe LR, Port ER, Brogi E, Fishman J, Liu CH, et al. HER-2/neu status is a determinant of mammary aromatase activity in vivo: Evidence for a cyclooxygenase-2-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2006;66(10):5504–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu CH, Chang SH, Narko K, Trifan OC, Wu MT, Smith E, et al. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is sufficient to induce tumorigenesis in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(21):18563–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris RE, Alshafie GA, Abou-Issa H, Seibert K. Chemoprevention of breast cancer in rats by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2000;60(8):2101–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Subbaramaiah K, Morris PG, Zhou XK, Morrow M, Du B, Giri D, et al. Increased levels of COX-2 and prostaglandin E2 contribute to elevated aromatase expression in inflamed breast tissue of obese women. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(4):356–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Brueggemeier RW, Su B, Sugimoto Y, az-Cruz ES, Davis DD. Aromatase and COX in breast cancer: enzyme inhibitors and beyond. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;106(1-5):16–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Glynn SA, Prueitt RL, Ridnour LA, Boersma BJ, Dorsey TM, Wink DA, et al. COX-2 activation is associated with Akt phosphorylation and poor survival in ER-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:626.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. de Pedro M, Baeza S, Escudero MT, Dierssen-Sotos T, Gomez-Acebo I, Pollan M, et al. Effect of COX-2 inhibitors and other non-steroidal inflammatory drugs on breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149(2):525–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall SF, Bernstein L, nton-Culver H, Deapen D, Horn-Ross PL, Mohrenweiser H, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and breast cancer risk by stage and hormone receptor status. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2005;97:805–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ready A, Velicer CM, McTiernan A, White E. NSAID use and breast cancer risk in the VITAL cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109(3):533–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cook NR, Lee IM, Zhang SM, Moorthy MV, Buring JE. Alternate-day, low-dose aspirin and cancer risk: Long-term observational follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):77–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Terry MB, Gammon MD, Zhang FF, Tawfik H, Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, et al. Association of frequency and duration of aspirin use and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2433–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gallicchio L, Visvanathan K, Burke A, Hoffman SC, Helzlsouer KJ. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of developing breast cancer in a population-based prospective cohort study in Washington County, MD. Intl J Cancer J Intl Du Cancer. 2007;121(1):211–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirsh VA, Kreiger N, Cotterchio M, Sloan M, Theis B. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and breast cancer risk: Subgroup findings. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:709–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brasky TM, Bonner MR, Moysich KB, Ambrosone CB, Nie J, Tao MH, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and breast cancer risk: Differences by molecular subtype. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(7):965–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Cui Y, Deming-Halverson SL, Shrubsole MJ, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Cai H, Fair AM, et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and reduced breast cancer risk among overweight women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):439–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothwell PM, Fowkes FG, Belch JF, Ogawa H, Warlow CP, Meade TW. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):31–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Trentham-Dietz A, Sprague BL, Hampton JM, Miglioretti DL, Nelson HD, Titus LJ, et al. Modification of breast cancer risk according to age and menopausal status: A combined analysis of five population-based case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(1):165–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirose K, Tajima K, Hamajima N, Inoue M, Takezaki T, Kuroishi T, et al. A large-scale, hospital-based case-control study of risk factors of breast cancer according to menopausal status. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995;86(2):146–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Bosco JL, Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Hatch EE, Rosenberg L. Regular aspirin use and breast cancer risk in US Black women. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(11):1553–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Khalid N. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(19):1534–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Russo J, Mailo D, Hu YF, Balogh G, Sheriff F, Russo IH. Breast differentiation and its implication in cancer prevention. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(2 Pt 2):931s–6s.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker RA, Martin CV. The aged breast. J Pathol. 2007;211(2):232–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S, Easton DF, Ponder BA. Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intl J Cancer J Intl Du Cancer. 1997;71(5):800–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Spector D, Deroo LA, Sandler DP. Lifestyle behaviors in black and white women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med. 2011;52(5):394–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al. 2015

Advertisement