Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

microRNA-34a inhibits epithelial mesenchymal transition in human cholangiocarcinoma by targeting Smad4 through transforming growth factor-beta/Smad pathway

  • Pengfei Qiao1,
  • Guodong Li2, 3,
  • Wen Bi1,
  • Lianmeng Yang1,
  • Lei Yao1 and
  • Dequan Wu1Email author
BMC Cancer201515:469

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1359-x

Received: 4 November 2014

Accepted: 23 April 2015

Published: 16 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is one of the uncommon malignancies in the digestive system which is characterized by a poor prognosis. Aberrations of miRNAs have been shown involved in the progression of this disease. In this study, we evaluated the expression and effects of miR-34a on EHCC.

Methods

miR-34a expression levels were detected in EHCC tissues, adjacent non-tumor tissues, normal bile duct (NBD) specimens of patients and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) cell lines by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Relationships between miR-34a with clinical characteristics of EHCC patients were further analyzed. Computational search, functional luciferase assay and western blot were further used to demonstrate the downstream target of miR-34a in CC cells. Immunohistochemistry was carried on to identify the downstream target gene of miR-34a in EHCC patients. Cell morphology, invasion and migration assays were further applied to confirm the anti-carcinogenic effects of miR-34a through the downstream target.

Results

miR-34a expression was significantly decreased in human EHCC tissues and CC cell lines when compared with the adjacent non-tumor tissues and normal bile duct tissues. miR-34a was found correlated with the migration and invasion in EHCC patients. Smad4 was over-expressed in most of the EHCC patients and was further demonstrated as one of the downstream targets of miR-34a, which was involved in the progression of EHCC. Moreover, activation of miR-34a suppressed invasion and migration through TGF-beta/Smad4 signaling pathway by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro.

Conclusions

Taken together, our results suggest that miR-34a inhibits invasion and migration by targeting Smad4 to suppress EMT through TGF- beta/Smad signaling pathway in human EHCC.

Keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma miR-34a Smad4 Epithelial-mesenchymal transition Transforming growth factor-beta

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a bile duct cancer, and is classified anatomically as intrahepatic CC (IHCC) or extrahepatic CC (EHCC). EHCC is a highly malignant cancer of the biliary tract [1, 2]. The incidence and mortality of EHCC is rising worldwide. Despite advances in surgical techniques, chemotherapies and radiotherapies, median survival of EHCC remains less than 24 months because of the patients are usually diagnosed at the advanced stage as the tumor has metastasized to regional lymph nodes or liver sites, which are the main prognostic factors in EHCC patients [3]. Exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation, progression, invasion and metastasis of EHCC is vital as it may provide new therapeutic targets, leading to improvements in the long-term survival of patients with EHCC.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs of 20–22 nucleotides involved in the regulation of gene expression at a post-transcriptional level by binding to the target sites of messenger RNAs (mRNAs). miRNAs act as important post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, and have recently emerged as key regulatory molecules in various cellular processes, including differentiation, self-renewal, proliferation and apoptosis [4]. It has been found that miRNAs regulate the expression of target genes by interacting with complementary sites in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of target mRNAs [5], and more than 30 % of human genes are regulated post transcriptionally by miRNAs [6]. miRNAs may function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors by targeting many cancer-associated genes in the progression of EHCC. The miR-34 family members share high sequence homology [7]. Among these, miR-34a is one of the earliest known tumor suppressors and is commonly deleted in various types of cancers. As a direct transcriptional target of p53, decreased expression of miR-34a is partly due to the mutations of p53 in tumors [8]. Recent research has found that down-regulation of miR-34a leads to a switch from Mnt (MAX network transcriptional repressor) to c-Myc expression during cholestatic cholangiocarcinogenesis in a mouse model [9]. Moreover, miR-34a can suppress tumor metastasis and invasion through a variety of signaling pathways in several cancers [1014]. However, the anti-tumor function of miR-34a in EHCC is still not clear yet.

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which is a secreted homodimeric protein, belongs to a large family of pleiotropic factors that signal via heterotetrameric complexes of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors. Important intracellular mediators of TGF-β signaling are members of the Smad family [15]. Smad4 is the common-mediator which cooperates with other transcription factors to regulate TGF-β signaling pathway [16]. The TGF-β signaling pathway has been shown to involve in various cellular responses in carcinogenesis of EHCC including cell proliferation and differentiation, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [1719].

In the present study, miR-34a expression levels were detected in EHCC tissues, and CC cell lines. Relationships of miR-34a with clinical characteristics of EHCC patients were further examined. Moreover, Smad4 was demonstrated as a direct transcriptional target of miR-34a in CC. We identify miR-34a could mediate TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway induced EMT in the progression of cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Patients and tissue samples

EHCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues used for qRT-PCR and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) were collected from 27 EHCC patients who underwent potentially curative surgery between 2010 and 2011 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (Harbin, China) and were verified by a pathologist. Seven primary normal bile duct (NBD) specimens were also collected from surgical resections performed for pancreatic cancer. These patients underwent a Whipple’s procedure. The hard and firm tumor tissues were trimmed free of normal tissue and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after resection. No patient in the current study received chemotherapy or radiation therapy before the surgery. The tumor stage was classified according to the 7th tumor-node-metastasis classification of the International Union against Cancer (UICC). All the patients signed informed consent forms according to our institutional guidelines, and the study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols of Harbin Medical University. Information on gender, age, stage of disease, and histological factors was extracted from medical records.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Immunohistochemical staining of sections for Smad4 expression was performed by a standard streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex method [20]. Each 4-mm section was deparaffinised, rehydrated, and incubated with fresh 0.3 % hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity. After rehydration through a graded series of ethanol solutions, the sections were autoclaved in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95 °C for 20 min and then cooled to 30 °C. After rinsing in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4), non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubation with 10 % normal rabbit serum for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with anti-Smad4 primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) at a dilution of 1:100 in PBS containing 1 % bovine serum albumin at 4 °C overnight. The sections were washed in PBS, incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG for 30 min at room temperature, and finally incubated in a streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex solution (Nichirei Co., Tokyo, Japan). The chromogen, 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine tetra-hydrochloride, was applied as a 0.02 % solution containing 0.005 % H2O2 in 50 mM ammonium acetate-citrate acid buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and mounted. Negative controls were established by replacing the primary antibody with normal rabbit serum. No detectable staining was evident in the negative controls.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

qRT-PCR was used to confirm the expression levels of mRNAs and miRNAs. For mRNAs detection, total RNA from cultured cells and fresh surgical tissues was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the protocol. Reverse transcription was performed according to the protocol of High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). For miRNAs detection, total miRNA from cultured cells and fresh surgical tissues was extracted using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Complimentary DNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). The expression level of miRNA and mRNA were assessed with qRT-PCR using Power SYBR® Green (Applied Biosystems, USA) by an Applied Biosystems 7500 Sequence Detection system. The expression level of mRNA and miRNA was defined based on the threshold cycle (Ct), and relative expression levels were calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method, using the expression level of β-actin mRNA and U6 small nuclear RNA as a reference gene. The names of the genes and the primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Cell culture and quick transfection

The human EHCC cell lines QBC939 and HuCCT1 used in this study were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, USA) and the human IHCC cell line RBE and HCCC9810 were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells (HiBECs) were purchased from PriCells Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). All the cells were cultured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A chemically modified antisense oligonucleotide and a synthetic miR-34a mimic (GenePharm Co. Ltd, China) were used to inhibit and increase miR-34a expression respectively. A scrambled oligonucleotide (GenePharm Co. Ltd, China) was used as a control. The transfections were performed using Lipofectamine TM 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A mixture of Lipofectamine 2000 and RNA was added to CC cells, which were 70 % confluent, for 4–6 hrs, and the cells were then incubated for 24 hrs in fresh medium. After that, the cells were harvested using lysis buffer for luciferase assay. Total RNAs and protein were prepared 48 hrs after transfection and used for qRT-PCR or western blot analysis.

Construction of promoter reporter plasmids and luciferase reporter assays

The fragment containing miR-34a binding sites in the Smad4 3′-UTR was amplified by PCR and inserted downstream of the firefly luciferase gene in a pGL3-promoter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The mutant reporter plasmids were constructed using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). These constructed plasmids were all sequenced to confirm their orientation. Luciferase activity was measured with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as mentioned before [21, 22]. Promoter activities were expressed as the ratio between Firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase activities.

Western blot

Protein lysates were separated using 8 % or 10 % SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, USA). The membrane was probed with the following antibodies: anti-Smad4, anti-Snail, anti-E-cadherin, anti-N-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). Finally, the membrane was probed with Alexa Fluor® 680 donkey anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (1:5000) (Invitrogen, USA). Antibody binding was detected by Odyssey™ Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE). The names of the antibodies are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Cell migration and invasion assays

The invasive potential of cells was measured in 6.5 micrometers Transwell with 8.0 micrometers Pore Polycarbonate Membrane Insert (Corning, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The filter of top chamber was matrigel-coated with 50 μl of diluted matrigel following the standard procedure and incubated at 37 °C for 2 hrs. The lower chambers were filled with 600 μl of DMEM medium with or without TGF-β (5 ng/mL) (R&D Systems Inc., USA) containing 5 % FBS as chemoattractant for a further 24 hrs [19]. Cells were serum-free-starved overnight, and then harvested and resuspended in migration medium (DMEM medium with 0.5 % BSA). Then the suspension of 5,000 cells in 100 μl migration medium was added into each top chamber. After the cells were incubated for 16 hrs, the non-invading cells that remained on the upper surface were removed with a cotton swab. The invasive cells on the lower surface of the membrane insert were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with 0.2 % Triton X-100 at room temperature for 15 min, and then stained with 0.1 % crystal violet for 5 min. The number of cells on the lower surface, which had invaded through the membrane, was counted under a light microscope in five random fields at a magnification of 100×. The experiments were repeated three times independently and results were given as means ± SD. The procedure for transwell migration assays were the same as the transwell invasion assay except that the filter of top chamber was not coated with matrigel.

Statistical analysis

All the presented data were expressed as the mean ± SD and representative results were from at least three independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were calculated by Student’s two-tailed t-test. When multiple comparisons were possible, ANOVA coupled with Tukey correction was used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to analyze all factors in the Table 1 by backward variable selection. Survival curves for the patients were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and analyzed using the Log-rank test. Correlation analysis between relative expressions of Smad4 and miR-34a was examined by logistic regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 21 (IBM Corporation Software Group, USA) or the GraphPad Prism 5.0 software package (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA).
Table 1

Relationship between miR-34a expression and clinicopathological features in EHCC patients

Clinicopathological features

n

miR-34a

P value

Low

High

Age (yr)

   

0.695

<60

14

4

10

 

≥60

13

5

8

 

Gender

   

1.000

Male

16

8

8

 

Female

11

6

5

 

Tumor size (cm)

   

0.449

<2

12

5

7

 

≥2

15

9

6

 

Pathological type

   

0.222

Adenocarcinoma

24

11

13

 

Mucocellulare carcinoma

0

0

0

 

Adenosquamous carcinoma

3

3

0

 

Squamous carcinoma

0

0

0

 

Undifferentiated carcinoma

0

0

0

 

Cell differentiation

   

0.326

Well

4

3

1

 

Moderately

8

5

3

 

Poorly

15

8

7

 

Bismuth classification

   

0.385

Bismuth I

7

1

6

 

Bismuth II

13

10

3

 

Bismuth III

6

2

4

 

Bismuth IV

1

1

0

 

Lymphatic node metastasis

   

0.004

Absent

9

1

8

 

Present

18

13

5

 

Clinical stages

   

<0.001

I + II

13

2

11

 

III + IV

14

12

2

 

P <0.05 is significant

Results

miR-34a expression in human EHCC tissues and CC cell lines, and the clinicopathological significance of miR-34a expression in EHCC patients

The relative expression level of miR-34a in EHCC tissues was significantly lower than the NBD and the adjacent non-tumor tissues (P < 0.01, Fig. 1a). No significant difference was found between the NBD tissues and the adjacent non-tumor tissues. For further characterization of miR-34a expression in CC cell lines, HiBECs, EHCC cell line QBC939, HuCCT1 and the IHCC cell lines RBE and HCCC9810 were examined. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression level of miR-34a was markedly decreased in all of the CC cell lines in comparison with the expression levels in HiBECs (P < 0.01, Fig. 1b). To further evaluate the clinical value of miR-34a in EHCC patients, we divided the patients into two groups according to the median value (5.113) of the expression level of miR-34a. The correlation between miR-34a and clinicopathological characteristics was then analyzed (Table 1). miR-34a showed lower expression levels in specimens with lymphatic metastasis (P = 0.004, Table 1) and in the advanced clinical stages (stage III, IV vs I, II) (P < 0.001, Table 1). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that miR-34a expression related with clinical stages (P = 0.0013, Table 2). However, no association of miR-34a was observed with age, gender, tumor size, different pathological types, cell differentiation and Bismuth classification (P > 0.05, Table 1). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that down-regulation of miR-34a was correlated with decreased disease-free survival (Fig. 1c, P = 0.004). Furthermore, Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze all the factors in Table 1 by backward variable selection. The results indicated that only miR-34a was selected into the model (P = 0.002). Thus, miR-34a was an independent prognostic indicator in EHCC.
Fig. 1

miR-34a expression in human EHCC tissues and CC cell lines, and the relationship between miR-34a expression and disease-free survival in EHCC patients. a The mRNA expression profile of miR-34a in 27 primary EHCC tissues compared to the adjacent non-tumor tissues and 7 normal bile duct tissues (NBD) determined by qRT-PCR (***P < 0.01). U6 was used as the internal control. b The mRNA expression level of miR-34a in 4 CC cell lines (QBC939, HuCCT1, RBE and HCCC9810) compared to HiBECs determined by qRT-PCR (***P < 0.01). U6 was used as the internal control. c miR-34a predicts disease-free survival in EHCC patients. The Kaplan-Meier curve of disease-free survival in patients with high miR-34a expression (n = 13) and low miR-34a expression (n = 14) (***P < 0.01). The median disease-free survival time was 13.07 months and 23.54 months in low- and high- miR-34a group, respectively (*P < 0.05)

Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for screening the influencial factors of miR-34a expression

Variable

b

OR (95 % CI)

P value

Intercept

0.0266

Clinical stages

−3.4965

0.030 (0.004 ~ 0.253)

0.0013

(I + II versus III + IV)

   

Note: All clinicopathological features were employed for variable selection in the logistic regression analysis using a stepwise backward method. With the significance level for removal set at 0.05, only clinical stages was screened into the final model

miR-34a and Smad4 protein levels are inversely expressed in human EHCC tissues

In order to determine the clinical significance of miR-34a target genes in EHCC, Sanger miRNA database (http://www.mirbase.org/) and Targetscan (http://www.targetscan.org/) were used to predict the candidates of miR-34a. Moreover, both miR-34a and TGF-β/Smad4 pathway have been shown to involve in mediating metastasis and invasion in various types of cancers including cholangiocarcinoma [23, 24]. Thus, we examined Smad4 expression in the human clinical specimens. It was found that the mRNA level of Smad4 was not pronouncedly inhibited in human EHCC tissues compared with NBD and adjacent non-tumor tissues (Fig. 2a). The expression of Smad4 protein levels were further detected in 27 EHCC and 7 NBD specimens by IHC. As shown in Fig. 2b, positive staining of Smad4 was mainly identified in the cell cytoplasm of cancer cells in 18 of 27 tumor tissues and negative staining for Smad4 protein in 5 of 7 NBD tissues. Even a down-regulation of miR-34a with negative staining for Smad4 proteins were found in 7 patients, low expression of miR-34a is associated with positive staining for Smad4 protein in 18 EHCC samples. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine a negative correlation between Smad4 protein expression level and miR-34a level (B = −3.035, P = 0.01) among the total 27 EHCC tissues. These data suggest that miR-34a expression is inversely correlated with Smad4 in EHCC patients, and miR-34a might play a critical role on Smad4 regulation in over a half but not all of the EHCC patients.
Fig. 2

The expression levels of Smad4 in the primary EHCC and NBD specimens. a The mRNA expression level of Smad4 in the primary EHCC, the adjacent non-tumor tissues and NBD specimens determined by qRT-PCR. U6 was used as the internal control. b Immunohistochemical staining of Smad4 protein expression in primary EHCC and NBD samples. The arrows indicated nuclear staining of Smad4 in both NBD and EHCC samples. (I) Low Smad4 protein expression in a NBD. (II) High Smad4 protein expression in a NBD. (III) Reduced Smad4 protein expression in a primary EHCC. (IV) High Smad4 protein expression in a primary EHCC. Original magnification, 100× and 400× respectively for each slide

miR-34a directly targets Smad4 in CC cells

Based on the Sanger miRNA database and TargetScan software, one potential binding site of miR-34a in the 3′-UTR of Smad4 (from 2995 to 3002) was predicted (Fig. 3a). To test the specific regulation through the predicted binding site, we constructed a reporter vector consisting of the luciferase coding sequence followed by the 3′-UTR of Smad4. A dual luciferase reporter assay was performed in QBC939 and HuCCT1 cell lines. As shown in Fig. 3b, a significant decrease in relative luciferase activity was observed when pGL3-Smad4-3′-UTR was cotransfected with a miR-34a mimic compared with the vector-only control. Moreover, partial mutation of the perfectly complementary sites in the 3′-UTR of Smad4 abolished the suppressive effect due to the disruption of the interaction between miR-34a and Smad4 (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Smad4 is a direct miR-34a target. a miRNA target prediction screened one computative miR-34a binding site at Smad4-three prime untranslated region (3′-UTR). b 3′-UTR luciferase reporter assay showed a reduction of relative luciferase activity of wild-type Smad4 3′-UTR by pre-miR-34a in QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells (**P < 0.05). c qRT-PCR analysis of expression of miR-34a treated with miR-34a mimics or miR-34a inhibitor in QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells (***P < 0.01). U6 was used as a loading control. Error bars represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. d Western blot analysis of Smad4 and Snail expression treated with miR-34a inhibitor or mimic in QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells. β-actin levels were used as internal loading control

Furthermore, to investigate the biological function of miR-34a in CC cells, we transfected miR-34a mimic oligonucleotides or miR-34a inhibitor oligonucleotides into the EHCC cell lines (QBC939 and HuCCT1) to further increase or decrease the endogenous level of miR-34a (Fig. 3b). The protein expression levels of Smad4 and Snail, which are downstream targets of TGF-β/Smad4 pathway, were found decreased by transfection with the miR-34a mimics but increased by transfection with a miR-34a inhibitor in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells (Fig. 3d). However, Smad4 mRNA levels were not significantly influenced by the over-expression or inhibition of miR-34a in vitro (Additional file 3: Figure S1). These data suggest that Smad4 expression was primarily inhibited by miR-34a at the translational level. Together, these results confirmed that Smad4 is a direct target of miR-34a and is regulated by miR-34a in CC cell lines.

Up-regulation of miR-34a represses the EMT via TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in CC cell lines

As Smad4 is the common-smad protein for the transduction of TGF-β signaling pathway, which plays important roles through EMT in carcinogenesis [16], the repression of Smad4 by miR-34a may impair this signaling pathway in EHCC. To further investigate the role of miR-34a in the progression of EHCC by its ability to repress EMT, we examined the effects of miR-34a on the downstream targets of TGF-β/Smad4 pathway in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells. The cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics or scramble oligos, and simultaneously treated with TGF-β. Western blot analysis showed that compared with TGF-β treatment alone, transfection of miR-34a mimics increased E-cadherin expression levels while decreasing Smad4 and N-cadherin protein levels (Fig. 4a). The morphological changes of EHCC cells were detected after transfected with miR-34a mimics and/or treated with TGF-β. The results showed that, after transfected with miR-34a mimics, the EHCC cells displayed a cobblestone-like morphology, and cell-to-cell adhesion was more intact compared with the control cells. However, when the cells were treated with TGF-β, a spindle-shaped morphology was developed, the cell-to-cell adhesions became weak, and the cells were scattered. Interestingly, after treated with both miR-34a mimics and TGF-β, the cells were assembled closely compared with miR-34a mimic transfection group (Fig. 4b). These data suggest that miR-34a could antagonize Smad4-mediated TGF-β induction of EMT in vitro.
Fig. 4

miR-34a antagonizes Smad4-mediated TGF-β induction of EMT in vitro.a Both of the QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics or scramble oligos, and treated with or without TGF-β simultaneously. After 48 hrs, cells lysate were examined with indicated antibodies by Western blot. β-actin was used as loading control. b Morphological investigations of the EHCC cells. Both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics then treated with or without 5 ng/ml of TGF-β for 24 hrs. Cells transfected with miR-34a scramble oligos were used as the controls (original magnification: ×200)

miR-34a suppresses the activation of TGF-β/Smad4 signal-induced invasion and migration in CC cell lines

EMT is often linked to a gain in the migratory and invasive properties of cells [19]. To further investigate whether miR-34a suppresses cell invasion and migration through TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway in EHCC, both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics then treated with or without TGF-β. Transwell migration and invasion assays were then performed after transfection. It was found that transfection with miR-34a significantly suppressed cell migration in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells. Similarly, invasion capacity was also significantly down-regulated in both of the cell lines (Fig. 5a). The cell migration and in invasion capacities were all induced in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cell lines after treated with TGF-β (Fig. 5b). However, these inductions were inhibited by the treatment with miR-34a mimics in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells (Fig. 5b). Moreover, Snail protein expression level was decreased by transfection with miR-34a mimics but increased by transfection with miR-34a inhibitor in both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells (Fig. 3d). Snail is one of the specific downstream targets of TGF-β/Smad4 in regulation of EMT [25]. These results indicate that miR-34a participates in the regulation of cell migration and invasion in EHCC cells through down-regulation of TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway.
Fig. 5

miR-34a suppresses EHCC cells invasion and migration through TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway. a The migration and invasive properties of EHCC cells treated with the empty vector, miR-34a mimic or miR-34a inhibitor were analyzed using a cell invasion assay in transwell chambers. Representative images of cells that had migrated into the lower chamber are shown (left panel, original magnification: ×100), and quantitative data are also presented (right panel, **P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.01). The average numbers of cells per field of view from three different experiments are plotted. b Both QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics then treated with or without 5 ng/ml of TGF-β for 24 hrs to evaluate cell invasion and migration activities. Cells transfected with miR-34a scramble oligos were used as the controls. Representative images of cells in the lower section of a transwell chamber are shown to demonstrate the migration and invasive properties of QBC939 and HuCCT1 cells when transfected with the empty vector, miR-34a mimic, TGF-β or a mixed miR-34a and TGF-β (left panel). Quantitative analyses of the migrated and invasion cells are also shown (right panel, **P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.01 indicates miR-34a mimic, TGF-β or a mixed miR-34a and TGF-β vs. NC. $$$P < 0.01 means a mixed miR-34a and TGF-β vs. TGF-β). Data are plotted as the average number of cells per field of view from three different experiments (original magnification: ×100)

Discussion

miR-34a is one of the most prominent miRNAs implicated in the development and progression of human cancers [7]. It is down-regulated in many human cancers including hepatocellular, ovarian, prostate and urothelial carcinoma, as well as colon, head and neck, gastric, breast, lung and pancreatic cancers [8, 1014, 2629]. In the present study, we found that miR-34a expression was significantly decreased in human EHCC tissues and CC cell lines when compared with the adjacent non-tumor tissues, NBD tissues and the HiBECs. Smad4 is further demonstrated as one of the targets of miR-34a, which was involved in the migration and invasion in EHCC cells. We also found activation of miR-34a suppresses the invasion and migration through TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway in vitro.

Previous studies have provided evidence for the important roles of deregulated expression of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of CC, including miR-29, miR-122, miR-124, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-200c, miR-370, miR-373, miR-376c and miR-494 [3036]. Some reports have demonstrated that miR-34a to be an important anti-oncogene by regulation of different downstream targets in various types of cancers [7, 8, 1014, 2629]. Down-regulation of miR-34a has been found in left and median bile duct ligation (LMBDL) mouse livers [9]. However, the role of miR-34a in EHCC has yet to be elucidated. In the present study, we showed that the expression of miR-34a was down-regulated in EHCC tissues. These data are consistent with the decreased expression levels of miR-34a in the digestive system cancers which has been demonstrated by several groups [9, 2629]. miR-34a functions as a tumor-suppressor miRNA, and can target many downstream genes in the development and progression of carcinogenesis. Our clinical analysis showed that down-regulation of miR-34a is correlated with lymphatic metastasis and advanced clinical stages. Moreover, lower expression of miR-34a correlated with the decreased disease-free survival in these EHCC patients. These data suggest that miR-34a is more likely involved in the metastasis or invasion during the progression of EHCC. Recent studies have found that miR-34a represses RhoA, a regulator of cell migration and invasion, by suppressing c-Myc–Skp2–Miz1 transcriptional complex that activates RhoA in human prostate cancer cells [37]. miR-34a was also found to reduce cell proliferation and invasiveness partially through its inhibitory effect on Delta-like 1 (DLL1) in choriocarcinoma [11]. Thus, miR-34a could also regulate some downstream targets in the progress of metastasis or invasion of EHCC.

Since miRNAs are generally involved in the pathogenesis of cancer by directly regulating the expression of their targets at a post-transcriptional level, we applied bioinformatic methods to predict the potential targets of miR-34a. Further investigation showed that miR-34a suppresses the activity of a luciferase reporter gene fused with the 3′-UTR of Smad4 mRNA, which is dependent on the miR-34a binding sequence. Our data revealed that miR-34a directly targets the 3′-UTR of Smad4, and that ectopic expression of miR-34a represses Smad4 protein level in CC cell lines. Interestingly, recent report suggested that miR-34a plays a critical role in the progression of cardiac fibrosis by increasing Smad4 expression to activate TGF-β1 [38]. These controversial results may due to the different experimental models and/or the various functions of miR-34a in different diseases. Besides, over-expression of miR-34a also inhibited the expression of TGF-β/Smad4 downstream targets N-cadherin and induced the expression level of E-cadherin. N-cadherin and E-cadherin are highly involved in the EMT during carcinogenesis [20]. EMT is a complex process in which epithelial cells acquire the characteristics of invasive mesenchymal cells. EMT has been implicated in cancer progression and metastasis. Several oncogenic pathways such as TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways have been shown to induce EMT [39]. The role of TGF-β in EMT, tumor invasiveness and metastasis has been firmly established in vitro and in vivo studies [28, 40], including in human EHCC. More importantly, TGF-β-induced activation of Smad complexes has been shown to play a crucial role during the induction of EMT [19]. Several reports have also shown that the levels of transcription factors driving EMT are controlled by miRNAs including miR-34a [26, 4144]. Thus, our data showed that activation of miR-34a could antagonize Smad4-mediated TGF-β induction of EMT process through regulation of E-cadherin and N-cadherin expression. Snail, which is a downstream target of TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway, was also decreased by increasing miR-34a expression but increased by using miR-34a inhibitor in EHCC cells.

Moreover, the expression levels of miR-34a and Smad4 are inversely correlated in human clinical specimens of EHCC. Although there are a few samples with both miR-34a down-regulation and negative staining for Smad4 proteins by IHC, the protein level of Smad4 was increased in most of our EHCC tissues compared with NBD tissues. For those EHCC specimens, which did not have inverse correlation of miR-34a and Smad4 expression, we speculate that other factors might antagonize or interfere with the effect of miR-34a on Smad4. The expression pattern of individual miRs with strict tissues, the clinical-feature-specificity or the different target genes involved in the unique regulation network of EHCC may all involved in the effect of miR-34a on Smad4 [35, 45]. These speculations need further investigations in the future. Our results showed forced up-regulation of miR-34a significantly inhibited the protein expression of Smad4, and inhibited CC cells invasion and migration. The contrast results were observed when the CC cells were treated with the miR-34a inhibitor. These results identified Smad4 as a novel target of miR-34a in the EMT process of EHCC. Based on the contrasting expression patterns of miR-34a and Smad4 in most of the EHCC tissues and our in vitro data, we proposed that miR-34a is involved in the pathogenesis of EHCC by directly inhibiting the protein expression of Smad4. Therefore, our studies demonstrated that miR-34a functions as a tumor-suppressor miRNA by inhibiting TGF-β/Smad-induced EMT in CC cells.

Conclusion

In summary, our results have identified miR-34a as a tumor suppressive miRNA in human EHCC, which acts at least in part through the repression of Smad4. Decreased expression of miR-34a in EHCC patients is correlated with lymphatic metastasis, advanced clinical stages and overall survival rate. Loss of the miR-34a expression leads to an induction of Smad4 and activation of TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway, which accelerate CC cells invasion and migration via EMT. Taken together, our data provide new insights into the potential contribution of miR-34a in inhibition the progression of EHCC, and suggest miR-34a is a useful molecule target for developing new therapeutic method against EHCC.

Abbreviations

UTR: 

3′-untranslated region

CC: 

Cholangiocarcinoma

DMEM: 

Dulbelcco’s Modified Eagle Media

EMT: 

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

EHCC: 

Extrahepatic CC

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

HiBECs: 

Human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells

UICC: 

International Union against Cancer

IHCC: 

Intrahepatic CC

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

miRNA: 

Micro RNA

Mnt: 

MAX network transcriptional repressor

NBD: 

Normal bile duct

PBS: 

Phosphate buffer saline

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real time Reverse Transcription-PCR

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81302059), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. LC2013C35), the Foundation of Educational Committee of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. 12541300), the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars, Ministry of Education of China, and the Youth Foundation of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
(2)
Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
(3)
Bio-Bank of Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

References

  1. Nitta T, Mitsuhashi T, Hatanaka Y, Miyamoto M, Oba K, Tsuchikawa T, et al. Prognostic significance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: comprehensive immunohistochemical study using a tissue microarray. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(7):1363–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Malhi H, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: modern advances in understanding a deadly old disease. J Hepatol. 2006;45(6):856–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Blechacz B, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 2008;48(1):308–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Shen J, Stass SA, Jiang F. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in human solid tumors. Cancer Lett. 2013;329(2):125–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(6):389–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Giordano S, Columbano A. MicroRNAs: new tools for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma? Hepatology. 2013;57(2):840–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang TC, Wentzel EA, Kent OA, Ramachandran K, Mullendore M, Lee KH, et al. Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2007;26(5):745–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kasinski AL, Slack FJ. miRNA-34 prevents cancer initiation and progression in a therapeutically resistant K-ras and p53-induced mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72(21):5576–87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang H, Li TW, Peng J, Tang X, Ko KS, Xia M, et al. A mouse model of cholestasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma and transcription factors involved in progression. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(1):378–88. 388 e371-374.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Yan K, Gao J, Yang T, Ma Q, Qiu X, Fan Q, et al. MicroRNA-34a inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7(3), e33778.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Pang RT, Leung CO, Lee CL, Lam KK, Ye TM, Chiu PC, et al. MicroRNA-34a is a tumor suppressor in choriocarcinoma via regulation of Delta-like1. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao W, Fan R, Wang L, Cheng S, Li H, Jiang J, et al. Expression and regulatory function of miRNA-34a in targeting survivin in gastric cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(2):963–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen QR, Yu LR, Tsang P, Wei JS, Song YK, Cheuk A, et al. Systematic proteome analysis identifies transcription factor YY1 as a direct target of miR-34a. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(2):479–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pang RT, Leung CO, Ye TM, Liu W, Chiu PC, Lam KK, et al. MicroRNA-34a suppresses invasion through downregulation of Notch1 and Jagged1 in cervical carcinoma and choriocarcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(6):1037–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ozdamar B, Bose R, Barrios-Rodiles M, Wang HR, Zhang Y, Wrana JL. Regulation of the polarity protein Par6 by TGFbeta receptors controls epithelial cell plasticity. Science. 2005;307(5715):1603–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Massague J. TGFbeta in cancer. Cell. 2008;134(2):215–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirose A, Tajima H, Ohta T, Tsukada T, Okamoto K, Nakanuma S, et al. Low-dose paclitaxel inhibits the induction of epidermal-mesenchymal transition in the human cholangiocarcinoma CCKS-1 cell line. Oncol Lett. 2013;6(4):915–20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Seok JY, Na DC, Woo HG, Roncalli M, Kwon SM, Yoo JE, et al. A fibrous stromal component in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals a cholangiocarcinoma-like gene expression trait and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Hepatology. 2012;55(6):1776–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Araki K, Shimura T, Suzuki H, Tsutsumi S, Wada W, Yajima T, et al. E/N-cadherin switch mediates cancer progression via TGF-beta-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(12):1885–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Katoh K, Nakanishi Y, Akimoto S, Yoshimura K, Takagi M, Sakamoto M, et al. Correlation between laminin-5 gamma2 chain expression and epidermal growth factor receptor expression and its clinicopathological significance in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Oncology. 2002;62(4):318–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li G, Thomas AM, Hart SN, Zhong X, Wu D, Guo GL. Farnesoid X receptor activation mediates head-to-tail chromatin looping in the Nr0b2 gene encoding small heterodimer partner. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(7):1404–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Li G, Thomas AM, Williams JA, Kong B, Liu J, Inaba Y, et al. Farnesoid X receptor induces murine scavenger receptor Class B type I via intron binding. PLoS One. 2012;7(4), e35895.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin Y, Zhang B, Liang H, Lu Y, Ai X, Chen X. JNK inhibitor SP600125 enhances TGF-beta-induced apoptosis of RBE human cholangiocarcinoma cells in a Smad-dependent manner. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(6):1623–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ito T, Sakurai-Yageta M, Goto A, Pairojkul C, Yongvanit P, Murakami Y. Genomic and transcriptional alterations of cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(6):380–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vincent T, Neve EP, Johnson JR, Kukalev A, Rojo F, Albanell J, et al. A SNAIL1-SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-beta mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(8):943–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu J, Wu G, Lv L, Ren YF, Zhang XJ, Xue YF, et al. MicroRNA-34a inhibits migration and invasion of colon cancer cells via targeting to Fra-1. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(3):519–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng Y, Guo JJ, Liu YM, Wu XL. MicroRNA-34A inhibits the growth, invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by targeting PDGFR and MET expression. Biosci Rep. 2014;34(3):art:e00112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jamieson NB, Morran DC, Morton JP, Ali A, Dickson EJ, Carter CR, et al. MicroRNA molecular profiles associated with diagnosis, clinicopathologic criteria, and overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(2):534–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li J, Wang K, Chen X, Meng H, Song M, Wang Y, et al. Transcriptional activation of microRNA-34a by NF-kappa B in human esophageal cancer cells. BMC Mol Biol. 2012;13:4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mott JL, Kobayashi S, Bronk SF, Gores GJ. mir-29 regulates Mcl-1 protein expression and apoptosis. Oncogene. 2007;26(42):6133–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Karakatsanis A, Papaconstantinou I, Gazouli M, Lyberopoulou A, Polymeneas G, Voros D. Expression of microRNAs, miR-21, miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-200c, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-223 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic significance. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52(4):297–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang J, Han C, Zhu H, Song K, Wu T. miR-101 inhibits cholangiocarcinoma angiogenesis through targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Am J Pathol. 2013;182(5):1629–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeng B, Li Z, Chen R, Guo N, Zhou J, Zhou Q, et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-124 by hepatitis C virus core protein promotes migration and invasion of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells by targeting SMYD3. FEBS Lett. 2012;586(19):3271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. An F, Yamanaka S, Allen S, Roberts LR, Gores GJ, Pawlik TM, et al. Silencing of miR-370 in human cholangiocarcinoma by allelic loss and interleukin-6 induced maternal to paternal epigenotype switch. PLoS One. 2012;7(10), e45606.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen YJ, Luo J, Yang GY, Yang K, Wen SQ, Zou SQ. Mutual regulation between microRNA-373 and methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(29):3849–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Iwaki J, Kikuchi K, Mizuguchi Y, Kawahigashi Y, Yoshida H, Uchida E, et al. MiR-376c down-regulation accelerates EGF-dependent migration by targeting GRB2 in the HuCCT1 human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell line. PLoS One. 2013;8(7), e69496.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamamura S, Saini S, Majid S, Hirata H, Ueno K, Chang I, et al. MicroRNA-34a suppresses malignant transformation by targeting c-Myc transcriptional complexes in human renal cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(2):294–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang Y, Qi Y, Du JQ, Zhang DF. MicroRNA-34a regulates cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction by targeting Smad4. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2014;18(12):1355–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Dupont S, Mamidi A, Cordenonsi M, Montagner M, Zacchigna L, Adorno M, et al. FAM/USP9x, a deubiquitinating enzyme essential for TGFbeta signaling, controls Smad4 monoubiquitination. Cell. 2009;136(1):123–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shen G, Lin Y, Yang X, Zhang J, Xu Z, Jia H. MicroRNA-26b inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting USP9X. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:393.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Li H, Xu L, Li C, Zhao L, Ma Y, Zheng H, et al. Ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b represses IGF-I-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition via ZEB2 and microRNA-200c regulation in gastric cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Y, Li W, Zang X, Chen N, Liu T, Tsonis PA, et al. MicroRNA-204-5p regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition during human posterior capsule opacification by targeting SMAD4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(1):323–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou X, Hu Y, Dai L, Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang W, et al. MicroRNA-7 inhibits tumor metastasis and reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition through AKT/ERK1/2 inactivation by targeting EGFR in epithelial ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(5), e96718.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Christodoulou F, Raible F, Tomer R, Simakov O, Trachana K, Klaus S, et al. Ancient animal microRNAs and the evolution of tissue identity. Nature. 2010;463(7284):1084–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qiao et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

Advertisement