Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Effects of small interfering RNA targeting thymidylate synthase on survival of ACC3 cells from salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

  • 1,
  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 3 and
  • 1
BMC Cancer20088:348

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-348

  • Received: 16 May 2008
  • Accepted: 26 November 2008
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target for chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer and high expression of TS has been associated with poor prognosis or refractory disease in several cancers including colorectal and head and neck cancer. Although TS is known to regulate cell cycles and transcription factors, its potency as a therapeutic target has not been fully explored in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

Methods

An ACC cell line (ACC3) was transfected with siRNA targeting the TS gene and inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis-associated molecules were evaluated in vitro. In addition, the in vivo effect of TS siRNA on tumor progression was assessed using a xenograft model.

Results

Our results demonstrated that ACC3 cells showed significantly higher TS expression than non-cancer cell lines and the induction of TS siRNA led to inhibition of cell proliferation. The effect was associated with an increase in p53, p21, and active caspase-3 and S-phase accumulation. We also found up-regulation of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT), a polyamine metabolic enzyme. Furthermore, treatment with TS siRNA delivered by atelocollagen showed a significant cytostatic effect through the induction of apoptosis in a xenograft model.

Conclusion

TS may be an important therapeutic target and siRNA targeting TS may be of potential therapeutic value in ACC.

Keywords

  • Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
  • Salivary Gland Carcinoma
  • Salivary Gland Cancer
  • ACC3 Cell
  • Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Background

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is one of the most common salivary gland carcinomas and has indolent characteristics and an ultimately fatal outcome. Although ACC is thought to typically grow slowly, late occurrence of locoregional recurrence and distance metastasis is very common because of a propensity for perineural invasion. ACC shows various histological patterns including tubular, cribriform, and solid types. It has been widely accepted that the prognosis for tumors that predominantly comprise solid patterns is worse than that of those with a tubular or cribriform pattern [1]. Several molecules, including p16, p27, and E-cadherin, have been proposed as prognostic markers [24], but markers useful as therapeutic targets have not been identified in ACC.

Thymidylate synthase (TS), a folate-dependent enzyme, plays a crucial role in DNA biosynthesis. TS catalyzes the transfer of one methyl group from methylenetetrahydrofolate to generate deoxythymidine-5'-monophosphate (dTMP) from 2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate (dUMP). dTMP is then phosphorylated to 2'-deoxyuridine-5'-triphosphate (dTTP), which is a direct precursor for DNA. TS is a critical cellular target for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is widely used in the treatment of several cancers including colorectal, breast, and head and neck cancer. The cytotoxicity of TS inhibitors, including 5-FU, has been attributed to the misincorporation of fluoronucleotides into DNA and RNA and the inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by the inhibition of TS enzyme activity. Consequently, the inhibition of TS activity has been shown to lead to apoptotic cell death resulting from intracellular thymidine depletion [5].

The role of TS as a target for its inhibitors and an oncogene is controversial and occasionally paradoxical. Overexpression of the TS gene has been associated with poor prognosis or disease refractory to 5-FU-based chemotherapy in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma [6]. Although 5-FU exerts anti-proliferative effects by inhibiting TS expression, treatment with TS inhibitor has been shown to frequently induce up-regulation of TS expression in cell lines and tissues from patients treated with 5-FU [7, 8]. In addition, TS overexpression or amplification induced by 5-FU exposure is associated with the acquisition of resistance to TS inhibitors [912]. Several recent studies have shown that TS gene induction leads to the acquisition of a malignant phenotype in vitro: transgenic mice overexpressing human TS in pancreatic islet cells developed islet hyperplasia or islet cell tumor [13, 14]. On the other hand, we recently reported that simvastatin, one of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, exerted anticancer effects with down-regulation of TS expression [15]. These observations suggest that TS acts as a putative oncogene as well as a critical target for conventional and novel chemotherapeutic treatments.

There is some experimental evidence that the TS gene directly or indirectly affects cell proliferation and cell cycle regulators including the p53 pathway. E2F transcription factor, a cell cycle accelerator at G1/S phase, has been shown to induce expression of TS, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and cyclin families in quiescent human cells and overexpression of TS results in down-regulation of tumor suppressor genes such as p53 and p21 in cancer cells [1618]. Cancer cells transfected with mutant p53 have been shown to be more resistant to 5-FU treatment than parent cells with wild-type p53 [19]. Previous investigations have revealed that reductive expression of TS by antisense or small interfering RNA (siRNA) results in inhibition of cell proliferation or improvement in chemosensitivity [2023]. However, the precise molecular and biological mechanisms of TS-specific inhibition or silence have not been fully elucidated. Although a recent investigation showed an intimate relationship between TS overexpression and poor clinical outcome in ACC, the significance of TS as a therapeutic target has been yet to be evaluated in ACC.

In recent years, RNA interference technology using siRNA has rapidly become a highly specific and powerful tool to silence target genes. To date, a number of studies have demonstrated that siRNA can be a novel tool for clarifying gene function in mammalian cells and may be applicable to gene-specific therapeutics. There have been no investigations into the efficacy of specific siRNA for the TS gene in the field of salivary gland cancer. Here, we have evaluated whether silence of the TS gene affects cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis in the ACC3 cell line.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

ACC3 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin, and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 95% air and 5% CO2.

Reagents and antibodies

Antibodies for immunoblotting were obtained from the following sources: mouse monoclonal anti-p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); mouse monoclonal anti-p53 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany); rabbit polyclonal anti-active-caspase-3 (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA); mouse monoclonal anti-TS(Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (Abcam).

siRNA transfection

The targeted base sequence for human TS was 5'-GGATTCTTCGAAAAGTTGA-3' (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). As a negative control, Silencer Negative Control #1 siRNA, a commercially available siRNA referred to as a nonspecific control (Ambion), was used. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, cells were transfected with 50 nmol/L annealed siRNA oligos using siPORT™ lipid transfection agent (Ambion) following the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were treated with transfection agent/siRNA complex for 48 h and subjected to further analyses. For extraction of RNA and protein and flow cytometry analysis, cells were primarily plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates.

Cell viability assay

The effect of siRNA on cell numbers was determined by counting viable cells with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). An equal number of cells (5000 cells/well) in 100 μL of culture medium were seeded into each well of a 96-well microplate and incubated for 24 h. Then, the cells were treated with TS siRNA or negative control siRNA. After incubation for 48 h, 10 μL of Cell Counting Kit-8 solution was added to each well and the plates were further incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Spectrophotometric absorbance was measured at 450 nm, with absorbance at 590 nm for reference.

Cell cycle analysis

After treatment, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and collected by treatment with EDTA/trypsin solution. Collected cells were then fixed with 70% cold ethanol, incubated with RNase A (2 mg/mL in PBS), and stained with 50 μg/mL of propidium iodide (Sigma). Cell cycle data were acquired by FACScan equipped with Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).

Reverse transcription-PCR analysis

Total RNA from cultured cells was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1 μg of total RNA was applied to one-step RT-PCR using a Gene Amp Gold RNA PCR reagent kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Oligomer primers were synthesized for TS (sense 5'-TCTGGAAGGGTGTTTTGGAG-3' and antisense 5'-CCTCCACTGGAAGCCATAAA-3') and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (sense 5'-CGAGATCCCTCCAAAATCAA-3' and antisense 5'-GTCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGAT-3') (Sigma Genosys, Hokkaido, Japan). One-step cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification were performed at 25°C for 10 min; 42°C for 12 min; 95°C for 12 min; 35 cycles at 94°C for 20 s, each annealing temperature for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and at 72°C for 7 min as a final extension. Annealing temperatures to amplify TS and GAPDH genes were 57°C and 60°C, respectively. PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and visualized by ultraviolet illumination.

Real-time quantitative reverse-transcription PCR

For each sample, 1 μg of total RNA was retrotranscribed with the SuperScript first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a 20 μL reaction. The obtained cDNA (10 μL) was then used for each duplicate in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, which was done on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequencing Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer's directions. RNA samples from human keratinocytes and human adult bronchial epithelial cells (Cell Applications, San Diego, CA, USA) were applied to real-time RT-PCR as control samples from non-cancer cells. PCR conditions were 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min. TaqMan probes for TS, GAPDH, and spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) were from the Assays-on-Demand Gene Expression Assay Mix (Applied Biosystems). Assay ID numbers for TS, GAPDH, and SSAT were Hs00426591_m1, Hs99999905_m1 and Hs00161511_m1, respectively. The expressions of TS and SSAT genes were standardized using GAPDH as a reference gene, and relative expression levels for the panel of cell lines were quantified by calculating 2-ΔΔC T, where ΔCT is the difference in CT between target and reference genes.

Western blot analysis

Cells were washed with PBS, and then incubated with medium containing agents or DMSO alone for control. After washing with PBS, the cells were then scraped with lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 μg/mL leupeptin. After centrifugation, the supernatant was harvested as a total protein extract and stored at -80°C. Protein concentrations were measured using a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Equal amounts of protein (10 μg) were separated by gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Atto, Tokyo, Japan) and electrophoretically transferred to PDVF membrane (Atto). The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS-0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature for 1 h. The membrane was incubated with primary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Immunoreactivity was detected by sequential incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz). Peroxidase activity was visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK).

Xenograft models in nude mice

A total of 3 × 106 ACC3 cells were suspended in 100 μL PBS and injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 4-week-old female BALB/c nu/nu mice (Clea Japan, Tokyo, Japan). After 10 days, when the tumors had reached an average volume of approximately 100 mm3, mice were treated with TS siRNA or Silencer Negative Control #1 siRNA. For the in vivo transfection of siRNA, AteloGene™ (Koken Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used. siRNA-atelocollagen mixture was prepared according to the manufacturer's directions. 5 μM of siRNA mixed with 200 μM atelocollagen was injected into tumors. Tumor diameters were measured at regular intervals with a caliper, and the tumor volume in mm3 was calculated by the formula: volume = length × width2 × 0.5. All animals were treated in a humane manner and managed according to the guidelines of our animal facility. To detect apoptotic cells, a standard terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues according to the manufacturer's recommendations (S7101; Chemicon International, Inc., CA, USA). The number of positive cells in 1000 tumor cells within 4–6 microscopic fields at × 200 magnification was counted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by unpaired Student's t test using SigmaStat statistical software (version 3.1; Systat Software, Point Richmond, CA). All of the tests were two-sided. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Results

Overexpression of TS mRNA in ACC3 cells

Initially, the expression level of TS mRNA transcript was evaluated with real-time RT-PCR using RNA samples from control non-cancer cell lines derived from skin keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells. Expression in ACC3 cells was significantly higher than in the non-cancer cell lines. TS gene expression was 11-fold higher in ACC3 cells than keratinocytes (Fig. 1). When compared with human adult bronchial epithelial cells, the TS gene expression was increased 79-fold in ACC3 cells.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Evaluation of TS mRNA transcript expression in the ACC3 cell line. Expression was compared with that in keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells as normal cell controls using real-time RT-PCR.

Effect on cell survival of transfection with siRNA targeting TS

Next, we examined the effect of TS siRNA transfection on the viability of ACC3 cells. Transfection of cells with TS siRNA resulted in dramatically decreased TS expression (Fig. 2A). Real-time RT-PCR confirmed that the induction of TS siRNA decreased TS expression to 12% of the level in cells transfected with negative control siRNA (Fig. 2B). Western blot comfirmed effect of TS siRNA on protein expression (Fig. 2C) TS siRNA transfectant cells showed significantly reduced cell viability in comparison with control cells. Cell viability was inhibited by 67% in ACC3 (Fig. 2D).
Figure 2
Figure 2

TS expression suppressed by TS-specific siRNA in ACC3 cells. After transfection for 48 h, TS expression was measured by conventional RT-PCR (A), real-time quantitative RT-PCR (B) and Western blot (C). Effect of TS suppression on cell survival in ACC3 cells (D). Cell survival conditions were evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 after transfection for 48 h. TS-suppressed cells were less proliferative than control cells (p < 0.01). The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *, P < 0.01, significantly different from control.

S-phase accumulation of cells by TS silence

We examined whether TS inhibition caused by siRNA transfection affected the cell cycle. Cell cycle phases were determined by flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining. S-phase populations significantly increased, from 29% to 49%, in ACC3 cells after treatment with TS siRNA (Fig. 3). Experiments were repeated several times and identical results were obtained. These results indicate that TS siRNA leads to cell-cycle arrest at S-phase with a significant increase in the S-phase population.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Effect of TS suppression on cell cycle in ACC3 cells. Representative flow cytometry graphs of cells 48 h after transfection with TS siRNA or negative control siRNA.

Effect of siRNA on the expressions of p53, p21, active caspase-3, and spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT)

To assess the effect of TS suppression on the expressions of cell cycle- or apoptosis-associated molecules, we focused on the expression of molecules involved in p53 pathway and apoptosis. Western blot analysis revealed that cells transfected with TS siRNA showed up-regulation of p21 and active caspase-3 proteins (Fig. 4A). The antibody for p53 detects wild-type p53 protein. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the expression of SSAT mRNA transcript increased 1.8-fold in TS siRNA-transfected ACC3 cells (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Effect of TS silence on expression of p53, p21, active caspase-3, and SSAT. Cells were transfected with each siRNA for 48 h and then protein and mRNA transcript expression was analyzed by Western blot (A) and real-time quantitative RT-PCR (B). The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *, P < 0.01, significantly different from control.

Inhibition of tumor growth by TS siRNA in ACC3 tumor xenografts

To investigate the antitumor effect of TS siRNA in vivo, we transfected TS siRNA and negative control siRNA into BALB/c nu/nu mice bearing ACC3 tumor xenografts. Subcutaneous tumors were developed by injecting 3 × 106 ACC3 cells into the right flank of female nude mice. When the tumor reached 100 mm3 in volume, TS siRNA or negative control siRNA was injected and mice were observed for 2 weeks. The mean tumor volumes on day 14 were 1162 mm3 in the TS siRNA-treated group and 3419 mm3 in the negative control group. Significant differences between the two groups were found on days 7 and 14 (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5A and 5B). To assess the involvement of apoptosis in the suppression of tumor growth after TS silence, we conducted TUNEL assay and found significantly higher proportion of TUNEL-positive cells in TS siRNA-treated ACC3 cells (Fig. 6C and 6D).
Figure 5
Figure 5

An in vivo study of TS siRNA in ACC3 tumor xenografts. 3 × 106 ACC3 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of mice. When the tumors reached a volume of approximately 100 mm3, TS siRNA and negative control siRNA were injected to the tumors. TS and control siRNA were mixed with atelocollagen. Mice were sacrificed 2 weeks after siRNA injection. (A) Three representative xenograft tumors from each group are shown. (B) Tumor size was measured and tumor volumes calculated. Each group consisted of six mice. The values are represented as mean ± SD. *, P < 0.01, significantly different from control.

Figure 6
Figure 6

An in vivo study of TS siRNA in ACC3 tumor xenografts. 3 × 106 ACC3 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of mice. When the tumors reached a volume of approximately 100 mm3, TS siRNA and negative control siRNA were injected to the tumors. TS and control siRNA were mixed with atelocollagen. Mice were sacrificed 2 weeks after siRNA injection. (C) After treatment with each siRNA, the xenografts were collected, fixed with 10% formalin, sectioned and stained for apoptotic cells by TUNEL method. The brown stain represented the DNA fragmentation of apoptotic cells and the blue stain showed the nuclei stain with hematoxylin (original magnification ×400). (D) The cumulative results showed the average number of apoptotic cells. Each group consisted of six mice. The values are represented as mean ± SD. *, P < 0.01, significantly different from control.

Discussion

Salivary gland carcinomas are uncommon neoplasms, accounting for approximately 5% of those arising in the head and neck region [24]. In general, these may be categorized into low grade and high grade malignancies based on their origin from either the terminal (intercalated) or the excretory ductal epithelium, respectively [25]. Biological and clinical classifications have been dependent on the histogenetic classification, but are occasionally diverse even within those categories [1]. Patients with higher histological grades appear to be more susceptible to locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. However, effective treatment for unresectable tumors has not been established [26]. ACC is a representative salivary gland neoplasm originated from terminal (intercalated) epithelial cells and is characterized by indolent clinical course. However, most patients eventually succumbed to late-onset recurrence and distant metastasis. No effective therapeutic targets have been established because of its rarity.

We have shown that siRNA to down-regulate TS expression effectively inhibited cell proliferation and caused S-phase arrest in ACC3 cells derived from salivary gland carcinoma. We also confirmed that another TS siRNA targeting 5'-GGTGACTTTATACACACTT-3' decreased TS mRNA expression and cell viability to 23% and 78% of the level in ACC3 cells transfected with negative control siRNA, respectively (data not shown). Gene knock-down by siRNA is a highly effective approach to silence gene expression in experimental as well as therapeutic setting. However, the interpretation of data is occasionally complicated because of non-specific gene silence, so-called off-target effects, which results from unintended interactions between silence molecule and cellular components and inappropriate concentration of siRNA [27]. Our TS-siRNA effectively suppressed both mRNA and protein. In cDNA microarray analysis in a squamous cell carcinoma cell line, our TS-siRNA primarily silenced TS mRNA expression (manuscript in preparation).

Previous reports have shown that 5-FU treatment leads to S-phase accumulation in colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [28]. In addition, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to down-regulate TS have been shown to induce S-phase arrest in a murine colon carcinoma cell line and human cancer cell lines [22, 23]. Our data demonstrate that TS silence predominantly targets the S-phase transition; thus, TS has a critical role in the regulation of the S-phase checkpoint. S-phase arrest by TS inhibition may be regulated by various mechanisms. The present cell cycle analysis showed that transient silence of TS gene induced S-phase accumulation without increase in sub-G1 population in ACC3 cells. The mechanism of S-phase accumulation induced by TS inhibition has not been fully understood. However, S-phase arrest seemed to be a common phenomenon of TS inhibition. TS inhibitors, such as 5-FU and ZD9331, induced increase in sub-G1 population or apoptosis after S-phase accumulation [8, 29]. Since the present TS siRNA induction into ACC3 cells is temporal or transient, S-phase accumulation with activation of p53 pathway may be considered to be an early event in pro-apoptotic effect of TS inhibition.

We presently focused on the interaction between TS silence and apoptotic mechanism. Previous studies have shown that overexpression of TS gene leads to down-regulation of p53 or p21 and the treatment with TS inhibitors leads to induction of p21 [29]. We have demonstrated here that targeted suppression of TS expression increased expression of p21 and active caspase-3 along with up-regulation of wild-type p53 in ACC3 cells. Our present results appeared to be consistent with previous studies showing that TS inhibition is associated with S-phase accumulation and p21 activation [22, 23, 28]. Our data that TS silence led to p21 up-regulation seemed to be controversial, because p21 activation correlated with G1 arrest in cell cycle. This discrepancy implies that different cell cycle mediators play a certain role to control the interaction between p21 and S-phase arrest induced in TS inhibition.

Here, real-time RT-PCR analysis demonstrated TS mRNA transcript to be significantly up-regulated in ACC3 cells compared with non-cancer cell lines. Numerous investigations have focused on the relationship between TS expression and resistant activity to TS inhibitory agents. Comparative genomic hybridization analyses have revealed that chemoresistance to 5-FU or poor clinical outcome is associated with gain of the 18p11.32 region encoding the TS gene [9]. Immunohistochemical study also showed that overexpression of TS protein was commonly observed and associated with resistance to chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [6]. In the meantime, we found significant amplification of TS mRNA transcript in ACC3 cells, which were derived from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland. This cell line has been widely used in a number of studies as a characteristic research model of ACC [30]. Chikamatsu et al. [31] recently reported that high expression of TS protein was observed in approximately one third of ACC cases and was possibly associated with poor clinical outcome. We have demonstrated here that TS siRNA effectively inhibited tumor growth through the activation of apoptosis in an in vivo xenograft model. Although the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutic agents on salivary gland cancer has been regarded to be limited, TS may be an important target for the treatment of ACC.

We demonstrated that TS silence by specific siRNA induced the overexpression of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) in ACC3 cells. SSAT is a gene involved in polyamine metabolism. Polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine), derived from ornithine in the urea cycle, play important roles in cell growth and cell differentiation by modulating DNA structure, DNA replication, and DNA repair. SSAT is a major enzyme in the polyamine degradation pathway [32]. We focused on the relationship between TS silence and SSAT expression because there have been several reports that polyamine metabolism is involved in cellular reaction induced by chemotherapeutic cytotoxic agents, such as TS inhibitors. It has been reported that treatment with chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-FU and cisplatin induces up-regulation of SSAT expression in several cancer cell lines and N1, N11-diethylnorspermine, a polyamine analog, enhances cytotoxic effect of 5-FU and oxaliplatin along with up-regulated SSAT expression [3335]. In addition, overexpression of SSAT has been shown to induce cell death or apoptosis. Increased expression of SSAT yields depletion of cellular polyamine content and consequently inhibits cell survival [36]. The detailed mechanisms and involvements of these molecules in TS silence mechanism are under further investigation.

In summary, our study showed that siRNA targeting TS efficiently reduced TS expression with inhibited cell growth in ACC3 cells from salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. The cytostatic activity of TS silence appeared to be associated with cell cycle arrest at S-phase and activation of p53 pathway. Furthermore, we showed that TS siRNA delivered by atelocollagen exerted an anti-proliferative and apoptotic effect in a xenograft model. Further elucidation of the role of TS as an oncogene or therapeutic target may contribute to the development of optimal treatments for salivary gland carcinomas including ACC.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (S. Maruya). The authors thank Dr Takashi Saku of Niigata University for kindly providing ACC3 cell lines.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Otolaryngology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
(2)
Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
(3)
Department of Pathology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
(4)
Department of Pathology, Odate Municipal Hospital, Odate, Japan

References

  1. Szanto PA, Luna MA, Tortoledo ME, White RA: Histologic grading of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands. Cancer. 1984, 54: 1062-1069. 10.1002/1097-0142(19840915)54:6<1062::AID-CNCR2820540622>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Maruya S, Kurotaki H, Shimoyama N, Kaimori M, Shinkawa H, Yagihashi S: Expression of p16 protein and hypermethylation status of its promoter gene in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. ORL. 2003, 65: 26-32. 10.1159/000068658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Takata T, Kudo Y, Zhao M, Ogawa I, Miyauchi M, Sato S, Cheng J, Nikai H: Reduced expression of p27(Kip1) protein in relation to salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma metastasis. Cancer. 1999, 86: 928-935. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990915)86:6<928::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maruya S, Kurotaki H, Wada R, Saku T, Shinkawa H, Yagihashi S: Promoter methylation and protein expression of the E-cadherin gene in the clinicopathologic assessment of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2004, 17: 637-645. 10.1038/modpathol.3800104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG: 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003, 3: 330-338. 10.1038/nrc1074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnston PG, Mick R, Recant W, Behan KA, Dolan ME, Ratain MJ, Beckman E, Weichselbaum RR, Allegra CJ, Vokes EE: Thymidylate synthase expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997, 89: 308-313. 10.1093/jnci/89.4.308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu E, Koeller DM, Johnston PG, Zinn S, Allegra CJ: Regulation of thymidylate synthase in human colon cancer cells treated with 5-fluorouracil and interferon-γ. Mol Pharmacol. 1993, 43: 527-533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yamane N, Makino M, Kaibara N: S-phase accumulation precedes apoptosis induced by preoperative treatment with 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal carcinoma cells. Cancer. 1999, 85: 309-317. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990115)85:2<309::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rooney PH, Stevenson DA, Marsh S, Johnston PG, Haites NE, Cassidy J, McLeod HL: Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosomal alterations induced by the development of resistance to thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5042-5045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang W, Marsh S, Cassidy J, McLeod HL: Pharmacogenomic dissection of resistance to thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5505-5510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Longley DB, Ferguson PR, Boyer J, Latif T, Lynch M, Maxwell P, Harkin DP, Johnston PG: Characterization of a thymidylate synthase (TS)-inducible cell line: a model system for studying sensitivity to TS- and non-TS-targeted chemotherapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 3533-3539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ooyama A, Okayama Y, Takechi T, Sugimoto Y, Oka T, Fukushima M: Genome-wide screening of loci associated with drug resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based drugs. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98: 577-583. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00424.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rahman L, Voeller D, Rahman M, Lipkowitz S, Allegra C, Barrett JC, Kaye FJ, Zajac-Kaye M: Thymidylate synthase as an oncogene: a novel role for an essential DNA synthesis enzyme. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5: 341-351. 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00080-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen M, Rahman L, Voeller D, Kastanos E, Yang SX, Feigenbaum L, Allegra C, Kaye FJ, Steeg P, Zajac-Kaye M: Transgenic expression of human thymidylate synthase accelerates the development of hyperplasia and tumors in the endocrine pancreas. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 4817-4824. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Takeda I, Maruya S, Shirasaki T, Mizukami H, Takahata T, Myers JN, Kakehata S, Yagihashi S, Shinkawa H: Simvastatin inactivates β1-integrin and extracellular signal-related kinase signaling and inhibits cell proliferation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98: 890-899. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00471.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. DeGregori J, Kowalik T, Nevins JR: Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15: 4215-4224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ju J, Pedersen-Lane J, Maley F, Chu E: Regulation of p53 expression by thymidylate synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 3769-3774. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3769.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kastanos EK, Zajac-Kaye M, Dennis PA, Allegra CJ: Downregulation of p21/WAF1 expression by thymidylate synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 285: 195-200. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giovannetti E, Backus HHJ, Wouters D, Ferreira CG, van Houten VMM, Brakenhoff RH, Poupon M-F, Azzarello A, Pinedo HM, Peters GJ: Changes in the status of p53 affect drug sensitivity to thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors by altering TS levels. Br J Cancer. 2007, 96: 769-775. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603639.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Flynn J, Berg RW, Wong T, van Aken M, Vincent MD, Fukushima M, Koropatnick J: Therapeutic potential of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to down-regulate thymidylate synthase in mesothelioma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 1423-1433. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmitz JC, Chen TM, Chu E: Small interfering double-stranded RNAs as therapeutic molecules to restore chemosensitivity to thymidylate synthase inhibitor compounds. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 1431-1435. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-1203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin SB, Ts'o PO, Sun SK, Choo KB, Yang FY, Lim YP, Tsai HL, Au LC: Inhibition of thymidylate synthase activity by antisense oligodeoxynucleotide and possible role in thymineless treatment. Mol Pharmacol. 2001, 60: 474-479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chi KH, Wang HE, Wang YS, Chou SL, Yu HM, Tseng YH, Hwang IM, Lui WY: Antisense thymidylate synthase electrogene transfer to increase uptake of radiolabeled iododeoxyuridine in a murine model. J Nucl Med. 2004, 45: 478-484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Spiro RH: Management of malignant tumors of the salivary glands. Oncology. 1998, 12: 671-680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sternberg SS: Histopathology for pathologists. 1997, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press, 405-425.Google Scholar
  26. Laurie SA, Licitra L: Systemic therapy in the palliative management of advanced salivary gland cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 2673-2678. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Echeverri CJ, Perrimon N: High-throughput RNAi screening in cultured cells: a user's guide. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7: 373-384. 10.1038/nrg1836.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Takeda H, Haisa M, Naomoto Y, Kawashima R, Satomoto K, Yamatuji T, Tanaka N: Effect of 5-fluorouracil on cell cycle regulatory proteins in human colon cancer cell line. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999, 90: 677-684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Geller JI, Szekely-Szucs K, Petak I, Doyle B, Houghton JA: P21Cip1 is a critical mediator of the cytotoxic action of thymidylate synthase inhibitors in colorectal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 6296-6303. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pramoonjago P, Baras AS, Moskaluk CA: Knockdown of Sox4 expression by RNAi induces apoptosis in ACC3 cells. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 5626-5639. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chikamatsu K, Shino M, Sakakura K, Nakajima K, Sakurai T, Miyashita M, Furuya N: Expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: correlation with clinical outcome. Oral Oncol. 2006, 43: 662-669. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Oredsson SM: Polyamine dependence of normal cell-cycle progression. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003, 31: 366-370. 10.1042/BST0310366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maxwell PJ, Longley DB, Latif T, Boyer J, Allen W, Lynch M, McDermott U, Harkin DP, Allegra CJ, Johnston PG: Identification of 5-fluorouracil-inducible target genes using cDNA microarray profiling. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4602-4606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hector S, Porter CW, Kramer DL, Clark K, Prey J, Kisiel N, Diegelman P, Chen Y, Pendyala L: Polyamine catabolism in platinum drug action: Interactions between oxaliplatin and the polyamine analogue N1, N11-diethylnorspermine at the level of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004, 3: 813-822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Allen WL, McLean EG, Boyer J, McCulla A, Wilson PM, Coyle V, Longley DB, Casero RA, Johnston PG: The role of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase in determining response to chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 128-137. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zahedi K, Bissler JJ, Wang Z, Josyula A, Lu L, Diegelman P, Kisiel N, Porter CW, Soleimani M: Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase overexpression in kidney epithelial cells disrupts polyamine homeostasis, leads to DNA damage, and causes G2 arrest. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 292: C1204-1215. 10.1152/ajpcell.00451.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/348/prepub

Copyright

© Shirasaki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement