- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
MGMT, GATA6, CD81, DR4, and CASP8 gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma
© Skiriute et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 December 2011
Accepted: 6 June 2012
Published: 6 June 2012
Methylation of promoter region is the major mechanism affecting gene expression in tumors. Recent methylome studies of brain tumors revealed a list of new epigenetically modified genes. Our aim was to study promoter methylation of newly identified epigenetically silenced genes together with already known epigenetic markers and evaluate its separate and concomitant role in glioblastoma genesis and patient outcome.
The methylation status of MGMT, CD81, GATA6, DR4, and CASP8 in 76 patients with primary glioblastomas was investigated. Methylation-specific PCR reaction was performed using bisulfite treated DNA. Evaluating glioblastoma patient survival time after operation, patient data and gene methylation effect on survival was estimated using survival analysis.
The overwhelming majority (97.3%) of tumors were methylated in at least one of five genes tested. In glioblastoma specimens gene methylation was observed as follows: MGMT in 51.3%, GATA6 in 68.4%, CD81 in 46.1%, DR4 in 41.3% and CASP8 in 56.8% of tumors. Methylation of MGMT was associated with younger patient age (p < 0.05), while CASP8 with older (p < 0.01). MGMT methylation was significantly more frequent event in patient group who survived longer than 36 months after operation (p < 0.05), while methylation of CASP8 was more frequent in patients who survived shorter than 36 months (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed patient age, treatment, MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 as independent predictors for glioblastoma patient outcome (p < 0.05). MGMT and GATA6 were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients’ group, while there were no significant associations observed in older patients’ group when adjusted for therapy.
High methylation frequency of tested genes shows heterogeneity of glioblastoma epigenome and the importance of MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 genes methylation in glioblastoma patient outcome.
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive astrocytic tumor of the central nervous system in adults. It is characterized by various genetic alterations, affecting genes that control cell growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion. Epigenetic alterations also affect the expression of cancer genes alone or in combination with genetic mechanisms. Cytosine methylation of CpG dinucleotides in gene promoters is a common cause of DNA silencing and transcriptional repression that can modulate clinical features of globlastoma. The best known is O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation determining tumors response to DNA alkylating agents and being an independent prognostic factor for patient survival . However, several widely described genes can be seen as only a partial picture of the methylation changes, there may be many more genes that need to be clarified. Recent methylome studies of brain tumors have disclosed a list of new epigenetically modified genes associated with gliomagenesis and different glioma clusters [2–4]. The latter studies illustrate glioblastoma profile being constructed via methylation of a multiple set of genes, forming networks attributed to different pathogenesis pathways. It has been suggested that in glioblastoma, highly methylated genes, such as CD81 (CD81 antigen), DR4 (death receptor 4, TRAIL receptor 1) and GATA6 (GATA binding protein 6), participating in cell adhesion, apoptosis, and proliferation  could be important in gliomagenesis. Newly obtained influence of GATA6 hypermethylation on glioblastoma patient survival in a small group of tumors was shown as a promising marker in prognostic purposes . To further study the importance of promoter methylation of newly identified epigenetically silenced genes (GATA6 CD81) and revealing its relationship with already known epigenetic markers (MGMT DR4 CASP8 (caspase-8)) could help to better understand glioblastoma biology. In the first part of the study we have reported promoter methylation of MGMT GATA6 CD81 DR4, and CASP8 genes. In the second part we have analyzed gene methylation correlations with patient variables. And in the third part we have analyzed whether the methylation status of five genes separately or in clusters are independent predictors for patient outcome.
The methylation profile of the MGMT GATA6 CD81 DR4, and CASP8 genes in 76 patients with WHO grade IV glioblastomas was investigated. All glioblastomas were graded and classified according to the 2007 WHO classification criteria . Tissue samples were collected from the Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, from 2003 to 2009. The ethics committee of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences and the Lithuanian Bioethics Committee approved the collection and use of human brain tumor tissue samples. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the surgery. Survival time was collected for all cases and calculated from the time of surgery to death or censor.
Primers for methylation-specific PCR
Forward primer 5´– 3´
Reverse primer 5´ – 3´
Statistical analysis was carried out with the software of IBM SPSS Statistics 19 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Quantitative data presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). To show the reliability of the estimate, the confidence interval (CI) with 95% confidence level was presented. For testing the statistical hypothesis the significance level of 0.05 was selected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival functions. For comparison of survival between two groups, the log-rank and generalized Wilcoxon tests were used. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to determine independent variables and prognosis relative hazard. For comparing means of two groups the independent samples t test was used. For testing statistical hypothesis about the independence of two variables, the chi-square test was used.
Glioblastoma patient data
The mean age at diagnosis was 61.2 years (range: 34-88; SD: 12.3 years). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.5. The mean age of male (n = 30) and female (n = 46) patients was 59.9 years (SD: 13.3 years) and 62 years (SD: 11.6 years), respectively.
The mean survival of patients with glioblastoma (n = 76) was 14.6 months (range: 0.26-52.60 months), while the median survival was 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.81-10.6 months). The survival rate at 12 and 24 months was 34.2% (95% CI: 23.7%-46.0%) and 22.4% (95% CI: 13.6%-33.4%), respectively.
As expected, it was observed glioblastoma patient survival association with age and adjuvant treatment (log-rank test, P = 0.001). The median survival of patients aged <60 years and ≥60 years was 15.6 and 4.5 months, respectively. Radiotherapy (RT) alone and RT plus concomitant chemotherapy (temozolomide) (RT + TMZ) were used for the postoperative treatment of glioblastomas in our study. RT alone was administered in 85.3% (n = 58) of cases and RT + TMZ was used in 14.7% (n = 10) of cases. Eight patients did not receive postoperative treatment due to their critical condition. The median survival for patients treated with RT + TMZ versus RT alone was 42.2 months (95% CI: 13.19-71.18 months) and 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.34-11.04 months).
Frequency of gene methylation and co-methylation in glioblastoma
Despite the frequent co-methylation of two genes in the same tissue varying from about 15% to 37%, no significant associations in the frequencies of gene methylation were documented (chi-square test, P > 0.05).
Associations between gene methylation and co-methylation, and patient data
Associations between demographic and clinical data of patients and methylation of five genes
Associations between gene methylation and patient survival
Kaplan-Meier survival function analysis in glioblastoma patients (log-rank test)
MGMT promoter methylation
4.6 to 7.9
4.2 to 15.7
GATA6 promoter methylation
7.2 to 11.9
2.9 to 9.5
CD81 promoter methylation
4.6 to 10.3
4.6 to 13.3
DR4 promoter methylation
4.9 to 12.8
5.6 to 9.3
CASP8 promoter methylation
6.9 to 12.9
3.3 to 9.2
No significant associations between the methylation of GATA6, CD81, and DR4 and patient survival were identified (Figures 2B–D). However, analysis of patient survival at early postoperative period showed a significantly shorter survival among patients with the methylated GATA6 promoter (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.045).
Contrary to the methylation profile of MGMT, the methylation of the CASP8 promoter was associated with shorter survival (log-rank test, P = 0.040) (Figure 2E). The median survival among patients with the unmethylated CASP8 promoter was 9.9 months (95% CI: 6.9-12.9 month) as compared with 6.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-9.2 months) among their counterparts with the methylated CASP8 promoter.
Associations between gene co-methylation and patient survival
Univariate Cox analysis identified patient age, treatment modality, and methylation profile of the MGMT and CASP8 promoters as independent predictive factors significantly associated with patient survival. Patients older than 60 years were more likely to survive shorter than their younger counterparts (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.09; P = 0.001). Moreover, patients who underwent treatment with RT + TMZ had a 76% reduced risk of death (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.60; P = 0.003) as compared with patients treated with RT alone.
Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis for glioblastoma patients
Multivariate Cox regression
When the patient sample was divided into two groups by age (<60 years and ≥60 years), multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that MGMT (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.42; P = 0.001) and GATA6 (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.01-7.65; P = 0.047) were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients’ group, while there were no significant associations observed in older patients’ group when adjusted for therapy (data not shown).
Our study demonstrated that epigenetic alterations affecting multiple genes, which are important in several cell functions, such as DNA repair, cell migration and apoptosis, are a frequent event in glioblastoma. At least one of the five genes tested was methylated even in 97.3% of patients with glioblastoma, while only 2.7% of patients had no detectable methylation. Analysis identified 3 genes epigenetically deregulated in more than 50% of glioblastomas: MGMT, GATA6, and CASP8. To our knowledge, only MGMT has been previously widely described in glioblastomas, while the data on the epigenetic regulation of GATA6, CD81, DR4, and CASP8 in patient glioblastoma are scarce.
This study showed that the most frequently methylated gene was GATA6, a transcription factor, with a methylation frequency of 68.4%. GATA6 is one of 6 members of the mammalian GATA family of transcription factors that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation and inhibits apoptosis . Recently, it has been suggested as a tumor suppressor gene in tumors of the CNS with gene expression loss of 90% and promoter methylation of 30%-48% in glioblastomas [3, 12–14]. It has been reported that loss of GATA6 results in enhanced astrocyte proliferation and transformation . A decrease in GATA6 expression was observed in colon and ovarian carcinomas as well [15, 16].
The CD81 gene showed promoter methylation in 46.1% of tested glioblastomas in the current study. This gene is a member of the membrane-embedded tetraspanin superfamily, which was found to be silenced by methylation in multiple myeloma cell lines . CD81 participates in several functions in a cell like adhesion and signal transduction . Recent glioblastoma methylome studies have shown CD81 methylation rate of 54% [2, 3].
Analysis of the methylation status of two proapoptotic genes, CASP8 and DR4, in our study revealed that these genes were methylated in 56% and 41% of glioblastomas, respectively. The inactivation of these genes by promoter methylation has been previously reported in osteosarcomas , melanomas , medulloblastomas , gastric carcinomas , and glioblastomas [3, 13, 21, 22]. The frequency of DR4 methylation in glioblastomas varied from 25% to 70% in different studies [3, 21, 22]. In our series as compared with the above studies, a lower frequency of DR4 methylation was observed, and we hypothesize that the difference could be attributed to the heterogeneity of glioblastomas. In contrast to the findings of Elias et al.  and Hervouet et al.  who showed 10%-30% methylation of CASP8 in glioblastomas, in this panel more than half of tumors were methylated (56%). The tendency of association between methylation of CASP8 and DR4 in glioblastomas was noted: co-methylation was observed in 28.4% (21/74) of tumors. A study carried out by Elias et al.  reported a smaller percentage of CASP8 and DR4 co-methylation in glioblastoma specimens (10%). It is known that DR4 and CASP8 are factors affecting the nonmitochondrial apoptotic pathway, and the loss of DR4 expression (which was shown to be mediated by promoter methylation) attenuates apoptosis and is associated with the resistance of glioma cells to proapoptotic ligand therapy (known as TRAIL resistance) . The importance of CASP8 in TRAIL resistance in gliomas has been reported as well , while the data of other studies have strongly suggested TRAIL sensitivity to be CASP8-independent and DR4-specific .
Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene, encoding a DNA repair enzyme, has been recently found to be of predictive value in glioblastoma. In agreement with numerous studies where the methylation of MGMT was detected in approximately 40%-48% of primary glioblastomas [1, 2, 24], our study showed a methylation frequency of 51%. However, contrary to the study by Cecener et al. , this study found no significant association between the methylation of MGMT and GATA6 (P > 0.05) despite rather high comethylation of these genes (37%).
Correlations with patient parameters showed MGMT and CASP8 gene methylation associations with patient age. Glioblastoma patients with methylated MGMT were significantly younger than those whose tumor lacked methylation (P < 0.05) and an opposite was observed for CASP8 (P < 0.01). Contrary, glioblastoma study of Cecener et al.  showed MGMT methylation association with older patient age (≥ 50 years), while in the study of Weller et al. MGMT methylation status was not associated with clinical parameters (age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance score or treatment).
Several associations between survival and patients’ characteristics were observed. Survival was strongly correlated with patients’ age and treatment modality. In agreement with previous studies [24, 25], it was observed that glioblastoma patients younger than 60 years and treated with RT + TMZ survived longer as compared with older and only RT-treated patients. Weller et al.  revealed age as a major therapy-independent factor in patient survival.
Cox regression analysis confirmed the methylation status of MGMT GATA6, and CASP8, but not CD81 and DR4, to be an independent factor for patient survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis showed the methylation status of MGMT to be significantly related to patient outcome. In agreement with previous studies [1, 3, 26] reporting the associations between MGMT methylation status and patient survival, our study showed that patients with methylated MGMT were more likely to survive longer and were at lower risk of death than those with the unmethylated gene. After dividing the patient sample into the groups by age (<60 years vs. ≥60 years), methylated MGMT remained a significant independent predictor of survival among patients aged less than 60 years. Furthermore, we confirmed significant association between the methylation profile of MGMT and treatment modality: in the group of patients treated with RT + TMZ, patients with methylated MGMT survived significantly longer than those with unmethylated gene promoter (median survival, 41.4 vs. 15.1 months) (data not shown).
In line with findings of the study by Martinez et al. , associations between the methylation of CASP8 and survival in our study showed gene methylation being an important factor for worse outcome of patients. Patients with unmethylated CASP8 as a favorable genotype had prolonged survival as compared with patients having tumors with methylated CASP8. Although CASP8 may play an essential role in apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy [27, 28], our study showed only a trend toward significant associations between the methylation status of CASP8 and survival of the patients treated with RT, and no associations in the group of the patients treated with RT + TMZ (data not shown).
Survival among patients with the methylated vs. unmethylated GATA6 gene differed significantly at early postoperative period (3-month survival, 100% vs. 75%). Cox regression analysis demonstrated CASP8 and GATA6 as independent predictors for patient survival. Furthermore, GATA6 became independent predictor for survival in younger patient group. Contrary to our results, recently it have been reported no relationship of GATA6 and CASP8 methylation status with survival in patients with glioblastoma. In agreement with the methylome study by Martinez et al. , where the significance of GATA6 methylation in patient survival has been shown for the first time, our results suggest that the methylation of GATA6 is a frequent event and highly important for survival of patients with glioblastoma.
The current study reveals new and important information on MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 promoter methylation in glioblastoma. GATA6 methylation occurred at a highest rate. Patient age, treatment regimen, MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 methylation status were significantly associated with patient survival. MGMT and GATA6 were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients’ group when adjusted for therapy. To further evaluate validation of the methylation profile of these genes is necessary for understanding their role in gliomagenesis and potential as GBM markers.
This research was funded by a grant (No. LIG – 17/2010) from the Research Council of Lithuania. We are very thankful to master students, Mr. Giedrius Steponaitis and Ms. Dalia Gedmintaite, from the Department of Biology of Vytautas Magnus university of Kaunas, Lithuania, for perfect technical help in gene methylation analysis.
- Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R: MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 997-1003. 10.1056/NEJMoa043331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laffaire J, Everhard S, Idbaih A, Criniere E, Marie Y, de Reynies A, Schiappa R, Mokhtari K, Hoang-Xuan K, Sanson M, Delattre JY, Thillet J, Ducray F: Methylation profiling identifies 2 groups of gliomas according to their tumorigenesis. Neuro Oncol. 2011, 13: 8498-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez R, Martin-Subero JI, Rohde V, Kirsch M, Alaminos M, Fern_Īndez AŁF, Ropero S, Schackert G, Esteller M: A microarray-based DNA methylation study of glioblastoma multiforme. Epigenetics. 2009, 4: 255-264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Hayes DN, Perou CM, Schmidt HK, Ding L, Wilson RK, Van Den Berg D, Shen H, Bengtsson H, Neuvial P, Cope LM, Buckley J, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Aldape K, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network: Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell. 2010, 17: 510-522. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.017.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- WHO Classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Edited by: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK. 2007, IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
- Esteller M, Hamilton SR, Burger PC, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 793-797.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drucker L, Tohami T, Tartakover-Matalon Zismanov, Shapiro H, Radnay J, Lishner M: Promoter hypermethylation of tetraspanin members contributes to their silencing in myeloma cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2006, 27: 197-204. 10.1093/carcin/bgi209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo M, Akiyama Y, House MG, Hooker CM, Heath E, Gabrielson E, Yang SC, Han Y, Baylin SB, Herman JG, Brock MV: Hypermethylation of the GATA genes in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 7917-7924. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee KH, Lim SW, Kim HG, Kim DY, Ryu SY, Joo JK, Kim JC, Lee JH: Lack of death receptor 4 (DR4) expression through gene promoter methylation in gastric carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Sur. 2009, 394: 661-670. 10.1007/s00423-009-0484-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Noesel MM, van Bezouw S, Salomons GS, Voute PA, Pieters R, Baylin SB, Herman JG, Versteeg R: Tumor-specific down-regulation of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 is associated with dense promoter hypermethylation. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 2157-2161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shureiqi I, Jiang W, Fischer SM, Xu X, Chen D, Lee JJ, Lotan R, Lippman SM: GATA-6 transcriptional regulation of 15-lipoxygenase-1 during NSAID-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 1178-1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cecener G, Tunca B, Egeli U, Bekar A, Tezcan G, Erturk E, Bayram N, Tolunay S: The Promoter Hypermethylation Status of GATA6, MGMT, and FHIT in glioblastoma. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012, 32: 237-244. 10.1007/s10571-011-9753-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hervouet E, Vallette FM, Cartron PF: Impact of the DNA methyltransferases expression on the methylation status of apoptosis-associated genes in glioblastoma multiforme. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1: e8-10.1038/cddis.2009.7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kamnasaran D, Qian B, Hawkins C, Stanford WL, Guha A: GATA6 is an astrocytoma tumor suppressor gene identified by gene trapping of mouse glioma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 8053-8058. 10.1073/pnas.0611669104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Caslini C, Capo-chichi CD, Roland IH, Nicolas E, Yeung AT, Xu XX: Histone modifications silence the GATA transcription factor genes in ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 5446-5461. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haveri H, Westerholm-Ormio M, Lindfors K, Maki M, Savilahti E, Andersson L, Heikinheimo M: Transcription factors GATA-4 and GATA-6 in normal and neoplastic human gastrointestinal mucosa. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008, 8: 9-10.1186/1471-230X-8-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Levy S, Todd SC, Maecker HT: CD81 (TAPA-1): a molecule involved in signal transduction and cell adhesion in the immune system. Annu Rew Immunol. 1998, 16: 89-109. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sadikovic B, Yoshimoto M, Chilton-Macneill , Thorner P, Squire JA, Zielenska M: Identification of interactive networks of gene expression associated with osteosarcoma oncogenesis by integrated molecular profiling. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18: 1962-1975. 10.1093/hmg/ddp117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bae SI, Cheriyath V, Jacobs BS, Reu FJ, Borden EC: Reversal of methylation silencing of Apo2L/TRAIL receptor 1 (DR4) expression overcomes resistance of SK-MEL-3 and SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells to interferons (IFNs) or Apo2L/TRAIL. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 490-498. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aguilera DG, Das CM, Sinnappah-Kang ND, Joyce C, Taylor PH, Wen S, Hasselblatt M, Paulus W, Fuller G, Wolff JE, Gopalakrishnan V: Reactivation of death receptor 4 (DR4) expression sensitizes medulloblastoma cell lines to TRAIL. J Neurooncol. 2009, 93: 303-318. 10.1007/s11060-008-9788-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elias A, Siegelin MD, Steinmüller A, von Deimling A, Lass U, Korn B, Mueller W: Epigenetic silencing of death receptor 4 mediates tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand resistance in gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 5457-5465. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez R, Setien F, Voelter C, Casado S, Quesada MP, Schackert G, Esteller M: CpG island promoter hypermethylation of the pro-apoptotic gene caspase-8 is a common hallmark of relapsed glioblastoma multiforme. Carcinogenesis. 2007, 28: 1264-1268. 10.1093/carcin/bgm014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulda S, Küfer MU, Meyer E, van Valen F, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Debatin KM: Sensitization for death receptor- or drug-induced apoptosis by re-expression of caspase-8 through demethylation or gene transfer. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 5865-5877. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204750.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weller M, Felsberg J, Hartmann C, Berger H, Steinbach JP, Schramm J, Westphal M, Schackert G, Simon M, Tonn JC, Heese O, Krex D, Nikkhah G, Pietsch T, Wiestler O, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Loeffler M: Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 5743-5750. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das P, Puri T, Jha P, Pathak P, Joshi N, Suri V, Sharma MC, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK, Suri A, Sarkar C: A clinicopathological and molecular analysis of glioblastoma multiforme with long-term survival. J Clin Neurosci. 2011, 18: 66-70. 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etcheverry A, Aubry M, de Tayrac M, Vauleon E, Boniface R, Guenot F, Saikali S, Hamlat A, Riffaud L, Menei P, Quillien V, Mosser J: DNA methylation in glioblastoma: impact on gene expression and clinical outcome. BMC Genomics. 2011, 11: 701-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fulda S, Sieverts H, Friesen C, Debatin KM: The CD95 (APO-1/Fas) system mediates drug-induced apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 3823-3829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rehemtulla A, Hamilton CA, Chinnaiyan AM, Dixit VM: Ultraviolet radiation-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation of CD-95 (Fas/APO-1). J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 25783-25786. 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25783.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/218/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.