- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Betulinic acid inhibits colon cancer cell and tumor growth and induces proteasome-dependent and -independent downregulation of specificity proteins (Sp) transcription factors
© Chintharlapalli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 1 June 2011
- Accepted: 24 August 2011
- Published: 24 August 2011
Betulinic acid (BA) inhibits growth of several cancer cell lines and tumors and the effects of BA have been attributed to its mitochondriotoxicity and inhibition of multiple pro-oncogenic factors. Previous studies show that BA induces proteasome-dependent degradation of specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 in prostate cancer cells and this study focused on the mechanism of action of BA in colon cancer cells.
The effects of BA on colon cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis and tumor growth in vivo were determined using standardized assays. The effects of BA on Sp proteins and Sp-regulated gene products were analyzed by western blots, and real time PCR was used to determine microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and ZBTB10 mRNA expression.
BA inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells and inhibited tumor growth in athymic nude mice bearing RKO cells as xenograft. BA also decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 transcription factors which are overexpressed in colon cancer cells and decreased levels of several Sp-regulated genes including survivin, vascular endothelial growth factor, p65 sub-unit of NFκB, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin D1, and pituitary tumor transforming gene-1. The mechanism of action of BA was dependent on cell context, since BA induced proteasome-dependent and proteasome-independent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 in SW480 and RKO cells, respectively. In RKO cells, the mechanism of BA-induced repression of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 was due to induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ROS-mediated repression of microRNA-27a, and induction of the Sp repressor gene ZBTB10.
These results suggest that the anticancer activity of BA in colon cancer cells is due, in part, to downregulation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 transcription factors; however, the mechanism of this response is cell context-dependent.
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- Colon Cancer Cell
- SW480 Cell
- Betulinic Acid
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of death in most developed countries including the United States, and in 2010 it is estimated that over 102,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 51,370 deaths will occur in the United States . Genetic susceptibility accounts for 15 - 25% of colon cancer cases, and genetic markers provide important insights on factors important for the molecular and genetic changes that result in development of this disease . Familial adenomatous polyposis syndromes [3, 4], hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer [5–8], and other polyposis syndromes which increase the incidence of colorectal cancer including Peutz Jegher's syndrome, familial juvenile polyposis, and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome, are linked to mutations in LKB1, STK11, SMAD4, PTEN, E-cadherin, cyclin D1, and transforming growth factor β receptors .
The incidence rates of sporadic colon cancer are highly variable among different regions of the world and the changes in incidence of this disease in migrants suggests that environmental factors related to diet contribute to development of colon cancer [9, 10]. Fruits, nuts and vegetables contain diverse anticarcinogenic phytochemicals; however, epidemiological studies give variable results with respect to their chemopreventive effects and similar variability among studies has been reported for the protective effects of dietary folate [11–14]. Most colon cancer patients present with localized disease which is treated with curative surgery; however, disease relapse is experienced by up to 40% of patients [15–17]. Cytotoxic drugs are primarily used for colon cancer chemotherapy and there is a increasing need to develop mechanism-based drugs for treating this disease.
Specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 are overexpressed in colon and other cancer cell lines [18–23], and Sp1 is a negative prognostic factor for survival of pancreatic and gastric cancer patients [24, 25]. The potential importance of Sp transcription factors as drug targets is due not only to their overexpression in multiple tumor types but also to their relatively low expression in non-tumor rodent and human tissues, and this is consistent with the reported decrease of Sp1 expression with increasing age [26–28]. RNA interference studies which knockdown Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 (individually or combined) have identified several Sp-regulated gene-products that are themselves individual targets for new mechanism-based drugs. Sp-regulated genes include several that are important for cancer cell proliferation [cyclin D1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET)], survival (bcl-2 and survivin), angiogenesis [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFR1/R2) and pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (PTTG-1)], and inflammation (p65 subunit of NFκB) [23, 29–38].
Betulinic acid (BA) is a naturally occurring triterpenoid which inhibits growth of multiple tumors [39, 40]. Studies in this laboratory show that BA inhibits prostate cancer cell and tumor (xenograft) growth and this is due, in part, to proteasome-dependent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and several Sp-regulated genes . In this study, we show that BA inhibits growth of colon cancer cells and tumors and downregulates Sp transcription factors through activation of proteasome-dependent (SW480 cells) and proteasome-independent (RKO cells) pathways.
Cell proliferation and cell cycle progression assays
The RKO and SW480 colon cancer cell lines were previously characterized at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and kindly provided by Dr. Stanley Hamilton. RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells (2 × 104 per well) were plated in 12-well plates and allowed to attach for 24 h. The medium was then changed to DMEM/Ham's F-12 medium containing 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS, and either vehicle [dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)] or different concentrations of the compound were added. Fresh medium and compounds were added every 48 h, and cells were then trypsinized and counted after 48 and 96 h using a Coulter Z1 cell counter. Results are expressed as means ± SE for at least 3 replicate determinations for each treatment group. RKO and SW480 cells were treated with either the vehicle (DMSO) or BA for 24 h. Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged and resuspended in staining solution containing 50 μg/ml propidium iodide, 4 mmol/L sodium citrate, and 30 units/ml RNase. After incubation at room temperature for 1 h, cells were analyzed on a FACS Vantage SE DiVa made by Becton Dickinson, using FACSDiva Software V4.1.1. Propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence was collected through a 610SP bandpass filter, and list mode data were acquired on a minimum of 50,000 single cells defined by a dot plot of PI width vs. PI area. Data analysis was performed in BD FACSDiva Software V4.1.1 using PI width vs. PI area to exclude cell aggregates.
Plasmids, transfection assay and antibodies
Sp1 and Sp3 promoter constructs were kindly provided by Drs. Carlos Cuidad and Veronique Noe (University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain). The pVEGF-2068 construct contains a VEGF promoter insert (positions -2068 to +54) linked to luciferase reporter gene. The pSurvivin-269 was kindly provided by Dr. M. Zhou (Emory University, Atlanta, GA). The PTTG-1-luc construct containing the -1373 to +3 region of the PTTG-1 promoter was provided by Dr. Kakar (University of Louisville, Louisville, KY). Colon cancer cells (1.5 × 105) were seeded in 12-well plates using DMEM:Ham's F-12 media containing 2.5% charcoal stripped serum. After 24 h, cells were transfected with 0.4 μg of reporter gene constructs and 0.04 μg of β-Gal using Lipofectamine 2000 according to manufacturer's protocol. Reporter lysis buffer and luciferase reagent for luciferase studies were supplied by Promega (Madison, WI). Five h after transfection, cells were treated with control or BA for 22-24 h and luciferase activity (normalized to β-galactosidase) was determined using Lumicount luminometer (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences). For RNA interference assays with iSp, a mixture of oligonucleotides containing siRNAs against Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 (combined) was used as previously described [20, 21, 34]. Antibodies for Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, cyclin D1, EGFR, NFκB (p65), VEGF and VEGFR1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). c-PARP and survivin antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Monoclonal β-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Western blots were determined with whole cell lysates essentially as described [20–23].
Northern blot analysis
For miRNA analysis, 20 μg total RNA per lane was electrophoresed on 15% TBE urea polyacrylaminde gel (Invitrogen), electrophoretically transferred in 0.5 × TBE at 300 mÅ for 45 min to GeneScreen Plus membrane (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA), UV cross-linked and hybridized in ULTRAhyb-Oligo hybridization buffer (Ambion, Austin, TX) at 42°C with 32P end-labeled DNA oligonucleotides complementary to miR-27a. Blots were washed at 42°C in 2X SSC and 0.5% SDS for 30 min with gentle agitation.
Semiquantitative reverse transcription and real time PCR
RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells were treated with BA at different concentrations for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and 2 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using Reverse Transcription System (Promega). Primers were obtained from IDT and used for amplification were as follows: ZBTB10 (sense 5'-GCT GGA TAG TAG TTA TGT TGC-3'; antisense 5'-CTG AGT GGT TTG ATG GAC AGA G-3'). PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualized under UV transillumination. Real time PCR for determining miR-27a, ZBTB10 and Myt-1 RNA levels were determined essentially as described [20–23].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial membrane potential assays
Cellular ROS levels were evaluated with the cell permeant probe CM-H2DCFDA (5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2'7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate acetyl ester) from Invitrogen. Following 36 h treatment, cells plated on a 6-well cell culture plate were loaded with 10 μM CM-H2DCFDA for 1 h, washed once with serum-free medium, and analyzed for ROS levels using Beckman Coulter XL four-color cytometer. Each experiment was done in triplicate and results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for each treatment group. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) was measured with Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection Kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol using JC-1 dye, and mitochondrial membrane potential shift was measured using FACS Calibur flow cytometer using CellQuest acquisition software (BD Biosciences). J-aggregates were detected as red fluorescence and J-monomers are detected as green fluorescence.
Xenograft studies in athymic mice
Female athymic nude mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Indianapolis, IN) and were cared for and used in accordance with institutional guidelines. To produce tumors, RKO cells (5 × 106; ≥ 90% viable) were subcutaneously injected into the flanks of individual mice. Tumors were allowed to grow for 6 days until palpable and mice were then randomized into two groups (6 mice/group) and dosed by oral gavage with corn oil or BA (25 mg/kg/day) every second day for 22 days. The mice were weighed, and tumor size was measured every second day with calipers to permit calculation of tumor volumes: V = LW2/2, where L and W were length and width, respectively. After BA treatment, the animals were sacrificed; final body and tumor weights were determined, and major visceral organs were collected and lysates were used for western blot analysis of Sp proteins.
1. BA inhibits colon cancer cell growth and induces apoptosis
2. BA decreases expression of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and Sp-regulated gene products in colon cancer cells
Treatment of RKO cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 alone was cytotoxic; however, in RKO cells treated with BA or the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin alone or in combination, BA-induced downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 was not inhibited indicating that the effects were proteasome-independent (Figure 2D). MG132 was not toxic to SW480 cells and BA-induced downregulation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 was reversed in cells cotreated with BA plus MG132 (and lactacystin; data not shown), demonstrating a proteasome-dependent pathway in this cell line as previously observed in LNCaP cells treated with BA .
3. BA decreases Sp and Sp regulated gene expression in RKO cells through disruption of miR-27a:ZBTB10
4. BA inhibits colon tumor growth
The anticancer activity of BA initially showed high potency against melanoma in cell culture and animal models, and subsequent studies show the effectiveness of this compound against multiple tumor types [39, 40, 42]. The low in vivo toxicity of BA coupled with supporting in vitro and in vivo results suggest that this compound or some derivative has potential for clinical applications in cancer chemotherapy. However, BA is a highly lipophilic molecule with limited water solubility and this may decrease in vivo uptake of this compound; therefore, development of specialized formulations/carriers such as liposomes may help to enhance the in vivo efficacy of BA as an anticancer agent . Previous studies in this laboratory showed that BA inhibits prostate cancer cell and tumor growth and this is accompanied by proteasome-dependent degradation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 and several Sp-regulated pro-oncogenic gene products . Several other anticancer agents including tolfenamic acid, curcumin, arsenic trioxide, a nitro-NSAID (GT-094), and two synthetic triterpenoid derivatives, CDDO-Me and CDODA-Me, also induce Sp downregulation in various cancer cell lines via proteasome-dependent and -independent pathways [19, 21, 33–38].
BA inhibits colon cancer cell growth and induces caspase-dependent PARP cleavage in RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells (Figure 1) and these results are consistent with other reports on the effects of BA on colon cancer cell lines [39, 40, 44–46]. Moreover, BA also inhibited tumor growth in athymic nude mice bearing RKO cells as xenografts (Figure 6). We observed that BA decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 proteins in both RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells and tumors (Figures 2A and 6C) and this was accompanied by parallel decreases in survivin and VEGF (Figures 2A and 2B), and these results are comparable to those observed in LNCaP prostate and KU7 bladder cancer cells treated with BA [20, 32]. Recent RNA interference studies show that p65 (NFκB subunit), EGFR, cyclin D1, and pituitary tumor transforming gene-1 (PTTG-1) are also Sp-regulated genes [32–35], and results in Figure 3C demonstrate that BA decreased expression of these gene products in RKO and SW480 cells. Moreover, knockdown of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 (in combination) in RKO colon cancer cells also decreased expression of EGFR, cyclin D1, p65 and PTTG-1, confirming the role of Sp transcription factors in regulating expression of these genes. These results are consistent with the induction of apoptosis by BA since many of these Sp-regulated genes are important for survival pathways.
Previous studies showed that BA-induced downregulation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 was proteasome-dependent in LNCaP cells but proteasome-independent in KU7 bladder cancer cells [20, 32]. Similar variability was observed in RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells (Figure 2D) where BA-induced downregulation of Sp proteins was proteasome-independent and -dependent, respectively. This demonstrates that, for BA and possibly other drugs that downregulate Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and Sp-regulated genes, the pathways required for this response are variable and dependent not only on tumor type but also cell context within the same tumor. At least two of these pathways, namely induction of proteasome- and caspase-dependent degradation of Sp proteins, involve activation of post-transcriptional processes [20, 21, 37]; however, their mechanisms have not been determined and are currently being investigated in this laboratory.
We have previously reported that the synthetic triterpenoid CDODA-Me and the NO-NSAID GT-094 decrease Sp protein expression in SW480 and RKO colon cancer cells through a transcriptional repression pathway in which miR-27a is decreased and this results in the induction of ZBTB10, a transcriptional repressor [36, 38]. BA decreased luciferase activity in RKO cells transfected with constructs containing several GC-rich promoter inserts (Figures 3B-D) and also decreased expression of miR-27a and induced expression of ZBTB10 in RKO cells (Figures 5A-C). Since overexpression of ZBTB10 and antisense-miR-27a also decreases expression of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and Sp-regulated genes in colon cancer cells , the mechanism of action of BA in RKO cells is linked to disruption of miR-27a:ZBTB10 as previously reported for CDODA-Me and GT-094 in colon cancer cells [36, 38].
BA is known to be a mitochondriotoxic drug and decreases the mitochondrial membrane potential in several different cancer cell lines leading to induction of apoptosis [39, 40, 44] and BA also decreased MMP in RKO cells (Figure 4C). Previous studies have demonstrated that at least four agents that are mitochondriotoxic and induce ROS also downregulate Sp proteins; this effect is ROS-dependent and reversible with antioxidants or catalase, and compounds activating this pathway include arsenic trioxide (bladder), curcumin and CDDO-Me (pancreatic), and GT-094 (colon) [33, 37, 38]. Moreover, for GT-094 and CDDO-Me, the mechanism of ROS-dependent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 involves disruption of miR-27a:ZBTB10 [33, 38]. Results of this study show that BA also induced ROS-downregulated Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and miR-27a and induced ZBTB10 in RKO cells, and all of these responses were significantly attenuated in cells cotreated with BA plus catalase (Figure 4). Moreover, catalase also reversed the growth inhibitory effects of BA (Figure 4C), further demonstrating the importance of ROS activation for the anticancer activity of this compound in RKO cells. In contrast to previous studies showing that CDODA-Me and GT-094 activated transcriptional repression of Sp proteins in both RKO and SW480 cells [33, 36], BA induced transcriptional repression in RKO cells but activated the proteasome pathway for degradation of Sp proteins in SW480 cells. The mitochondrial or extra-mitochondrial origins of ROS in cancer cells treated with BA and other agents that downregulate Sp transcription factors is currently being investigated.
In summary, we have shown that the anticancer activity of BA in colon cancer cells is due, in part, to downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and Sp-regulated prooncogenic gene products. The upstream mechanisms associated with decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 are cell context-dependent and involves proteasome-dependent (SW480) and proteasome-independent (RKO) pathways. The response in RKO cells involves loss of MMP and induction of ROS as previously reported for BA in other studies [39, 40] and this is coupled with ROS-dependent disruption of miR-27a:ZBTB10. BA also decreased luciferase activity in RKO cells transfected with a construct containing the -639 to +39 region of the miR-27a promoter, and we are currently examining the mechanisms associated with ROS-dependent effects on critical transcription factors interacting with the promoter and also the functional significance of ROS-dependent downregulation of miR-23a and miR-24-2 which form part of the miR-23a-miR-27a-miR24-2 cluster. These results coupled with several recent reports demonstrate potential clinical applications for BA and related compounds alone or in combination with other anticancer agents [47–49].
This research was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-CA136571) and Texas AgriLife.
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010, 60: 277-300. 10.3322/caac.20073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fearnhead NS, Wilding JL, Bodmer WF: Genetics of colorectal cancer: hereditary aspects and overview of colorectal tumorigenesis. Br Med Bull. 2002, 64: 27-43. 10.1093/bmb/64.1.27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Debinski HS, Love S, Spigelman AD, Phillips RK: Colorectal polyp counts and cancer risk in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. 1996, 110: 1028-1030. 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8612989.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spirio L, Olschwang S, Groden J, Robertson M, Samowitz W, Joslyn G, Gelbert L, Thliveris A, Carlson M, Otterud B: Alleles of the APC gene: an attenuated form of familial polyposis. Cell. 1993, 75: 951-957. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90538-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomlinson IP, Hampson R, Karran P, Bodmer WF: DNA mismatch repair in lymphoblastoid cells from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients is normal under conditions of rapid cell division and increased mutational load. Mutat Res. 1997, 383: 177-182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borresen AL, Lothe RA, Meling GI, Lystad S, Morrison P, Lipford J, Kane MF, Rognum TO, Kolodner RD: Somatic mutations in the hMSH2 gene in microsatellite unstable colorectal carcinomas. Human Mol Genet. 1995, 4: 2065-2072. 10.1093/hmg/4.11.2065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu B, Nicolaides NC, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Parsons RE, Jen J, Papadopolous N, Peltomaki P, de la Chapelle A, Hamilton SR: Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Nat Genet. 1995, 9: 48-55. 10.1038/ng0195-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aarnio M, Sankila R, Pukkala E, Salovaara R, Aaltonen LA, de la Chapelle A, Peltomaki P, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ: Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. Int J Cancer. 1999, 81: 214-218. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990412)81:2<214::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haenszel W, Kurihara M: Studies of Japanese migrants. I. Mortality from cancer and other diseases among Japanese in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968, 40: 43-68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whittemore AS, Zheng S, Wu A, Wu ML, Fingar T, Jiao DA, Ling CD, Bao JL, Henderson BE, Paffenbarger RS: Colorectal cancer in Chinese and Chinese-Americans. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1985, 69: 43-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michels KB, Giovannucci E, Chan AT, Singhania R, Fuchs CS, Willett WC: Fruit and vegetable consumption and colorectal adenomas in the Nurses' Health Study. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 3942-3953. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang W, Binns CW: Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90: 1112-1114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DH, Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Colditz GA, Freudenheim JL, Giovannucci E, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Harnack L, et al: Pooled analyses of 13 prospective cohort studies on folate intake and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010, 21: 1919-1930. 10.1007/s10552-010-9620-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eussen SJ, Vollset SE, Igland J, Meyer K, Fredriksen A, Ueland PM, Jenab M, Slimani N, Boffetta P, Overvad K, et al: Plasma folate, related genetic variants, and colorectal cancer risk in EPIC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19: 1328-1340. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0841.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Clark JW, Willett CG: Combined modality therapy for rectal and colon cancer. Semin Oncol. 2003, 30: 101-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cascinu S, Georgoulias V, Kerr D, Maughan T, Labianca R, Ychou M: Colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting: perspectives on treatment and the role of prognostic factors. Ann Oncol. 2003, 14 (Suppl 2): ii25-ii29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chau I, Cunningham D: Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: current status and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2002, 28: 223-236. 10.1016/S0305-7372(02)00047-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdelrahim M, Safe S: Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors decrease vascular endothelial growth factor expession in colon cancer cells by enhanced degradation of Sp1 and Sp4 proteins. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 68: 317-329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdelrahim M, Baker CH, Abbruzzese JL, Safe S: Tolfenamic acid and pancreatic cancer growth, angiogenesis, and Sp protein degradation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 855-868. 10.1093/jnci/djj232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chintharlapalli S, Papineni S, Ramaiah SK, Safe S: Betulinic acid inhibits prostate cancer growth through inhibition of specificity protein transcription factors. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 2816-2823. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chadalapaka G, Jutooru I, Chintharlapalli S, Papineni S, Smith R, Li X, Safe S: Curcumin decreases specificity protein expression in bladder cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 5345-5354. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6805.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mertens-Talcott SU, Chintharlapalli S, Li X, Safe S: The oncogenic microRNA-27a targets genes that regulate specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors and the G2-M checkpoint in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 11001-11011. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papineni S, Chintharlapalli S, Abdelrahim M, Lee SO, Burghardt R, Abudayyeh A, Baker C, Herrera L, Safe S: Tolfenamic acid inhibits esophageal cancer through repression of specificity proteins and c-Met. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 1193-1201. 10.1093/carcin/bgp092.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yao JC, Wang L, Wei D, Gong W, Hassan M, Wu TT, Mansfield P, Ajani J, Xie K: Association between expression of transcription factor Sp1 and increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression, advanced stage, and poor survival in patients with resected gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 4109-4117. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang NY, Woda BA, Banner BF, Whalen GF, Dresser KA, Lu D: Sp1, a new biomarker that identifies a subset of aggressive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17: 1648-1652. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2791.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ammendola R, Mesuraca M, Russo T, Cimino F: Sp1 DNA binding efficiency is highly reduced in nuclear extracts from aged rat tissues. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 17944-17948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adrian GS, Seto E, Fischbach KS, Rivera EV, Adrian EK, Herbert DC, Walter CA, Weaker FJ, Bowman BH: YY1 and Sp1 transcription factors bind the human transferrin gene in an age-related manner. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996, 51: B66-B75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh JE, Han JA, Hwang ES: Downregulation of transcription factor, Sp1, during cellular senescence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 353: 86-91. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdelrahim M, Smith III R, Burghardt R, Safe S: Role of Sp proteins in regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 6740-6749. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdelrahim M, Baker CH, Abbruzzese JL, Sheikh-Hamad D, Liu S, Cho SD, Yoon K, Safe S: Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR1) expression by specificity proteins 1, 3 and 4 in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 3286-3294. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3831.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higgins KJ, Abdelrahim M, Liu S, Yoon K, Safe S: Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells by Sp proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 345: 292-301. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chadalapaka G, Jutooru I, Burghardt R, Safe S: Drugs that target specificity proteins downregulate epidermal growth factor receptor in bladder cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2010, 8: 739-750. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Abdelrahim M, Basha MR, Samudio I, Konopleva M, Andreeff M, Safe SH: Methyl 2-Cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oate (CDDO-Me) decreases specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors and inhibits pancreatic tumor growth: role of microRNA-27a. Mol Pharmacol. 2010, 78: 226-236. 10.1124/mol.110.064451.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Lei P, Safe S: Inhibition of NFκB and pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth by curcumin is dependent on specificity protein downregulation. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 25332-25344. 10.1074/jbc.M109.095240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chintharlapalli S, Papineni S, Lee SO, Lei P, Jin U-H, Sherman SI, Santarpia L, Safe S: Inhibition of pituitary tumor-transforming gene-1 in thyroid cancer cells by drugs that decrease specificity proteins. Mol Carcinog.Google Scholar
- Chintharlapalli S, Papineni S, Abdelrahim M, Abudayyeh A, Abudayyeh A, Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Wu F, Mertens-Talcott SU, Vanderlaag K, et al: Oncogenic microRNA-27a is a target for anticancer agent methyl 2-cyano-3,11-dioxo-18β-olean-1,12-dien-30-oate in colon cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 1965-1974. 10.1002/ijc.24530.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Sreevalsan S, Lei P, Barhoumi R, Burghardt R, Safe S: Arsenic trioxide downregulation of specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors in bladder cancer cells is dependent on reactive oxygen species (ROS). Exper Cell Res. 2010, 316: 2174-2188. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pathi SS, Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Sreevalsan S, Anand S, Thatcher GR, Safe SH: GT-094, a NO-NSAID, inhibits colon cancer cell growth by activation of a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-microRNA-27a:ZBTB10-specificity protein (Sp) pathway. Mol Cancer Res. 2010, 9: 195-202. 10.1186/1476-4598-9-195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fulda S: Betulinic acid for cancer treatment and prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2008, 9: 1096-1107. 10.3390/ijms9061096.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fulda S, Kroemer G: Targeting mitochondrial apoptosis by betulinic acid in human cancers. Drug Discov Today. 2009, 14: 885-890. 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH, Kim VN: MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 4051-4060. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600385.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pisha E, Chai H, Lee IS, Chagwedera TE, Farnsworth NR, Cordell GA, Beecher CW, Fong HH, Kinghorn AD, Brown DM: Discovery of betulinic acid as a selective inhibitor of human melanoma that functions by induction of apoptosis. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 1046-1051. 10.1038/nm1095-1046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullauer FB, van BL, Daalhuisen JB, Ten Brink MS, Storm G, Medema JP, Schiffelers RM, Kessler JH: Betulinic acid delivered in liposomes reduces growth of human lung and colon cancers in mice without causing systemic toxicity. Anticancer Drugs. 2011, 22: 223-233. 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283421035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullauer FB, Kessler JH, Medema JP: Betulinic acid induces cytochrome c release and apoptosis in a Bax/Bak-independent, permeability transition pore dependent fashion. Apoptosis. 2009, 14: 191-202. 10.1007/s10495-008-0290-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takada Y, Aggarwal BB: Betulinic acid suppresses carcinogen-induced NF-kappa B activation through inhibition of I kappa B alpha kinase and p65 phosphorylation: abrogation of cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloprotease-9. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 3278-3286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung GR, Kim KJ, Choi CH, Lee TB, Han SI, Han HK, Lim SC: Effect of betulinic acid on anticancer drug-resistant colon cancer cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007, 101: 277-285. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00115.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y, Jia Z, Kong X, Li Q, Chang DZ, Wei D, Le X, Suyun H, Huang S, Wang L, et al: Combining betulinic acid and mithramycin A effectively suppresses pancreatic cancer by inhibiting proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011, 71: 5182-5193. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2016.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dehelean CA, Feflea S, Ganta S, Amiji M: Anti-angiogenic effects of betulinic acid administered in nanoemulsion formulation using chorioallantoic membrane assay. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2011, 7: 317-324. 10.1166/jbn.2011.1297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Q, Li Y, Wang X, Fang X, He K, Guo X, Zhan Z, Sun C, Jin YH: Co-treatment with ginsenoside Rh2 and betulinic acid synergistically induces apoptosis in human cancer cells in association with enhanced capsase-8 activation, bax translocation, and cytochrome c release. Mol Carcinog.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/371/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.