Skip to main content
Download PDF

Apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations and cancer in a large cohort of chronic kidney disease patients: results from the GCKD study

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 320 (2024) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 19 March 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly connected to inflammation and oxidative stress. Both favour the development of cancer in CKD patients. Serum apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) concentrations are influenced by kidney function and are an early marker of kidney impairment. Besides others, it has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Proteomic studies and small case–control studies identified low apoA-IV as a biomarker for various forms of cancer; however, prospective studies are lacking. We therefore investigated whether serum apoA-IV is associated with cancer in the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study.

Methods

These analyses include 5039 Caucasian patients from the prospective GCKD cohort study followed for 6.5 years. Main inclusion criteria were an eGFR of 30–60 mL/min/1.73m2 or an eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73m2 in the presence of overt proteinuria.

Results

Mean apoA-IV concentrations of the entire cohort were 28.9 ± 9.8 mg/dL (median 27.6 mg/dL). 615 patients had a history of cancer before the enrolment into the study. ApoA-IV concentrations above the median were associated with a lower odds for a history of cancer (OR = 0.79, p = 0.02 when adjusted age, sex, smoking, diabetes, BMI, albuminuria, statin intake, and eGFRcreatinine). During follow-up 368 patients developed an incident cancer event and those with apoA-IV above the median had a lower risk (HR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.57–0.90, P = 0.004). Finally, 62 patients died from such an incident cancer event and each 10 mg/dL higher apoA-IV concentrations were associated with a lower risk for fatal cancer (HR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.44–0.88, P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Our data indicate an association of high apoA-IV concentrations with reduced frequencies of a history of cancer as well as incident fatal and non-fatal cancer events in a large cohort of patients with CKD.

Graphical Abstract

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common disease, resulting in about 1–2 million deaths per year worldwide and is expected to be the fifth leading cause of death by 2040. Apart from the risk of kidney failure, CKD is associated with an increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [1].

The second leading cause of death worldwide is cancer [2]. The risk of cancer is significantly higher in all stages of kidney disease compared to the general population [3, 4]: there are multifactorial causes for this increased risk depending on cancer site, cause of CKD or immune dysregulation caused by chronic uraemia. Some cancer treatments also have a negative influence on kidney function [2, 3]. Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress are both conditions highly connected to kidney dysfunction [5] and can promote the development of cancer [6]. Furthermore, an insufficient symptom recognition in CKD patients results in a delayed cancer diagnosis at more advanced stages with an increased cancer mortality. Therefore early detection is essential to improve cancer outcomes in these patients [4, 7].

Apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) is a 46 kDa glycoprotein mainly produced in enterocytes of the small intestine [8]. It serves as one of the structural proteins of chylomicrons, VLDL and HDL or is found to be unbound to lipoproteins [9,10,11]. ApoA-IV binds to cells, promotes cholesterol efflux and is involved in reverse cholesterol transport [12]. It has antiatherogenic, antioxidant as well as antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties [13,14,15,16]. For example, experimental mouse models demonstrated that apoA-IV significantly modified and attenuated inflammation [14, 15].

The concentrations of apoA-IV are markedly increased in CKD, particularly in patients with kidney failure on dialysis [13]. ApoA-IV is filtered by the glomerulus and reabsorbed by proximal tubular cells [17]. It was found to be an early marker of kidney impairment and to predict the progression of CKD [18, 19]. Moreover, low apoA-IV was found to be associated with cardiovascular disease in the non-CKD population [20, 21] as well as with increased mortality and cardiac outcomes in CKD patients [22, 23]. The increase of apoA-IV in CKD patients who have overall a high cardiovascular disease rate is at the first glance counterintuitive. However, the increase is explained by an impaired filtration capacity and it might counteract the high oxidative stress and inflammatory burden of these patients.

Several proteomics studies identified low apoA-IV to be associated with various forms of cancer (Supplementary Table 1). Only few of them validated these findings by quantitative methods such as ELISA and if so, it has been done in small case–control studies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] but no prospective studies. We therefore analysed in the prospective German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study whether serum apoA-IV concentrations are associated with a history of cancer as well as incident cancer events in this cohort of CKD patients at high risk for cancer.

Materials and methods

German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study

The GCKD study includes 5217 carefully phenotyped Caucasian CKD patients recruited between 2010 and 2012 who were under regular care by nephrologists. It is an ongoing multicentre prospective cohort study. The study design and detailed characteristics have been published [23, 32, 33]. The study aimed to enrol patients with mild to severe CKD mostly in stage G3: that means an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30–60 mL/min/1.73m2 (KDIGO stage G3, A1-3) or an eGFR of > 60 mL/min/1.73m2 in the presence of overt albuminuria defined by a urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of > 300 mg/g or equal amounts of proteinuria (KDIGO stage G1-2, A3). Non-Caucasian ethnicity, solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, active malignancy within 24 months before screening, New York Heart Association stage IV heart failure, legal attendance, or inability to provide consent were exclusion criteria. At baseline, blood and urine samples were collected by trained personnel, processed, and sent on dry ice to a central biobank. Routine laboratory parameters were measured centrally [33]. eGFR was estimated using the CKD-EPI formula [34].

Each participant provided written informed consent, and all methods were performed in accordance with approved guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the ethics committees of each study center and registered in the national registry for clinical studies (DRKS 00003971). Data are collected and managed using Askimed (https://www.askimed.com) as a cloud-based web platform.

Patients are followed on a yearly basis by trained personnel who collect data on hospitalisations, outcome events and recent medical history using a structured interview. Any hospital discharge reports are collected from the treating physicians and/or hospitals. Endpoints are continually extracted from these reports by an endpoint committee.

Definition of outcomes

Incident cancer events included non-fatal and fatal cancer events. They were categorised in the groups renal tract cancers (kidney, bladder, urothelial cancer), male cancers (prostate cancer, others), female cancers (e.g. breast, cervix, uterus, ovary), cancer of digestive system (oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, rectum), skin cancer (melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma but no basal cell carcinoma), lung cancer, haematological cancers (lymphoma, leukaemia, multiple myeloma, and other malignant haematological conditions), cancers of the abdominal solid organs (liver, gallbladder, biliary tract, pancreas, other digestive organs), other cancers and cancers of unknown origin. Incident cancer events were events newly occurring during follow-up excluding those with a history of cancer (i.e. type of cancer that occurred the first time more than 24 months before the screening for the study). For the present analyses, prospectively collected endpoints are taken from the 6.5-year follow-up with data export from October 8, 2020. Details and frequencies of these main cancer groups are given in Supplementary Table 2. Fatal cancer events were investigated as an additional endpoint.

History of cancer more than two years before the enrolment into the study was collected by interview and patient discharge information and the retrospective collection of this information had not the level of standardization as the collection of the incident events.

Measurement of apoA-IV serum concentrations

Serum apoA-IV concentrations were measured at the Medical University of Innsbruck with a double-antibody ELISA using an affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-human apoA-IV antibody for coating. This antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase was used for detection. Serum with a known content of apoA-IV served as the calibration standard. Patient samples were diluted 1:12500. In case of the rare situation of very low or very high concentrations outside of the linear range, measurements were repeated using a lower or higher dilution, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 2.7% and 6%, respectively [19, 22, 35, 36].

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics of GCKD study participants are provided for the patient strata non-cancer, prevalent cancer (those with a history of cancer before enrolment), and incident cancer and by quartiles of apoA-IV concentrations for the total group. Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for trend were performed for comparison of continuous variables between quartile groups of apoA-IV. Linear by linear χ2-square tests were applied for comparison of categorical variables. The association of apoA-IV concentrations with history of cancer was examined by logistic regression analyses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for incident and fatal cancer endpoints. All deaths other than cancer were treated as censored observations. To prove the proportional hazards assumption a χ2-test based on Schoenfeld residuals was performed. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) based on competing risks survival regression were calculated additionally treating all other causes of death as competing events. For both baseline and follow-up analyses, model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, eGFR and UACR. Model 2 additionally included statin use, smoking, BMI, diabetes (patients with a history of cancer were excluded in the Cox regression analyses). This selection was based on clinical reasons and by taking into account differences of variables between quartiles of apoA-IV as shown in Supplementary Table 3. In early CKD, increased risk of cancer incidence and death was reported to be better predicted by eGFR based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) than eGFR based on creatinine (eGFRcrea) or a combination of creatinine and cystatin C [4]. Thus, eGFRcys was used in all models of follow-up analyses. As this was not shown for history of cancer, we additionally provide adjustment for eGFRcrea for baseline analyses. UACR and high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) were log-transformed based on the natural logarithm (ln) due to their skewed distribution. As CRP is not deemed to have a causal role in cancer [37] we additionally adjusted for hs-CRP only in sensitivity analyses.

Analyses were reported for quartile groups of apoA-IV, where quartile 1 was the reference, as well as for an increase of 10 mg/dL in apoA-IV concentration. The increment of 10 mg/dL is almost identical to the standard deviation of 9.8 mg/dL of the entire cohort. Based on visual inspection of quartile groups of apoA-IV for baseline and follow-up, further analyses were performed: where appropriate, patient values were compared above and below the median of apoA-IV concentrations.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, NY, USA) and R for Windows, version 4.3.1 (Vienna, Austria) (https://www.r-project.org). For all analyses performed, a two-sided test P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Five thousand thirty-nine of five thousand two hundred seventeen patients included in the GCKD study had complete baseline data on age, sex, eGFRcys, UACR, apoA-IV concentrations, cancer information and follow-up data available. The mean serum concentration of apoA-IV was 28.9 ± 9.8 mg/dL (median 27.6 mg/dL). Table 1 shows clinical characteristics at baseline (at the time of enrolment) for non-cancer patients (did not have cancer before enrolment and also not during follow-up), prevalent cancer patients (those with a history of cancer before enrolment), and incident cancer patients (those who developed a new cancer event during follow-up which has not been experienced before enrolment). The table provides data on apoA-IV concentrations, age, sex, kidney function parameters, body mass index, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, lipids, hs-CRP and statin intake. Supplementary Table 3 shows further baseline characteristics by quartiles of apoA-IV in the total cohort.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study patients stratified by cancer statusa
Full size table

History of cancer

At baseline, 615 patients with available data on apoA-IV, age, sex, and kidney function, had already experienced a cancer event more than two years before the enrolment (active malignancy within 24 months before screening was an exclusion criterion). First, an analysis based on quartiles of apoA-IV concentrations was done with quartile 1 as reference group. Results of both model 1 and model 2 showed in quartiles 3 and 4 a lower odds for history of cancer when compared to patients in quartile 1 and 2. When we compared patients above and below the median of apoA-IV concentrations we barely missed significance in terms of a lower odds for a history of cancer in patients above the median of apoA-IV with an OR = 0.84 (95% CI 0.70–1.02, p = 0.07) (Table 2). When adjusting for eGFRcrea, estimates reached significance (OR = 0.79 (95% CI 0.66–0.96, p = 0.02) (Table 2).

Table 2 Association of apolipoprotein A-IV with history of cancer (615 and 611 out of 5039 patients). Results are given for both eGFR adjustments (once calculated with cystatin C and once with creatinine)
Full size table

Incident cancer

During a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 368 patients experienced a new incident cancer event which has not been experienced before enrolment (a relapse of a given cancer did not count for this analysis). There was no violation of the proportional hazards assumption. An analysis based on quartiles of apoA-IV concentrations was performed with quartile 1 as reference group. Results of model 1 and the fully adjusted model 2 indicated that especially patients in quartiles 3 and 4, although missing significance in quartile 4 (p = 0.07), had a lower risk for incident cancer (Table 3). Based on this observation, risk estimates above and below the median of apoA-IV concentrations were compared. This revealed a significantly lower risk for patients with apoA-IV concentrations above the median in the fully adjusted model 2 (HR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.57–0.90, p = 0.004).

Table 3 Association of apolipoprotein A-IV with incident cancer during the prospective follow-up in patients without a history of cancer at the baseline investigation (4424 out of 5039 patients) a
Full size table

Fatal cancer

Of the 4424 patients with no history of cancer before enrolment into the study, 62 patients died from cancer during follow-up. The analysis based on quartiles of apoA-IV revealed lower risks for quartiles 2, 3 and 4, with statistical significance in quartile 2 and 4 and missing significance in quartile 3 (Table 4). Furthermore, each increase in apoA-IV concentrations of 10 mg/dL, was associated with a 40% lower risk to die when using the age-, sex- and kidney function-adjusted model 1 (HR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.43–0.85, p = 0.003). Model 2 additionally adjusting for statin use, diabetes, BMI, and smoking, revealed very similar results (HR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.44–0.88, p = 0.007).

Table 4 Association of apolipoprotein A-IV with fatal cancer during the prospective follow-up and without a history of cancer at the baseline investigation (4424 out of 5039 patients)a
Full size table

Additional analyses

We additionally adjusted the main models for HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. These additional analyses did not change the association of apoA-IV with prevalent and incident cancer events which might be explained by the rather weak association of apoA-IV concentration with lipids (Supplementary Tables 4, 5 and 6).

For incident and fatal cancer, we analysed whether the association of apoA-IV with these outcomes changed when we adjusted for a history of cancer instead of excluding those cases. The hazard ratios were only minimally influenced by this approach (Supplementary Tables 7 and 8).

In a further sensitivity analysis we adjusted the baseline and all follow-up analyses additionally for hs-CRP, which only marginally changed the association between apoA-IV and cancer outcomes (Supplementary Tables 9, 10 and 11). However, adjustment for hs-CRP has to be considered with caution because the classical requirements for a confounder are not entirely fulfilled, since it has been shown by genetic studies that genetically explained hs-CRP concentrations are not significantly associated with cancer [37]. Furthermore, we did not adjust for socioeconomic status (education and income) since this status was not associated with apoA-IV concentrations.

The subdistribution hazard ratios for incident and fatal cancer outcomes were only slightly attenuated as compared to the cause-specific hazard ratios (Supplementary Tables 12 and 13).

Discussion

We observed in this large cohort study of patients with mild to severe CKD i) that higher apoA-IV concentrations at baseline were associated with a lower odds for a history of cancer and ii) that during 6.5 years of follow-up higher apoA-IV concentrations were associated with a lower risk for incident cancer, particularly fatal cancer outcomes. All these associations were independent of kidney function. To our knowledge this is the largest and the only prospective study up to now which has investigated the association of apoA-IV with cancer, independent whether the literature in CKD or non-CKD patients is considered (Graphical Abstract).

Several proteomic studies have suggested apoA-IV as a biomarker and a tool for detection of various forms of cancer (Supplementary Table 1). Most of these studies investigated only a small number of serum or plasma samples and only few validated the results by an independent and quantitative method such as an ELISA [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Most data are available for ovarian cancer with quantitatively validated lower apoA-IV concentrations observed in three studies [24,25,26]. Further data were reported for pancreatic, oral, hepatocellular, and thyroid cancer (Supplementary Table 1). The distribution of cancer types in our GCKD study is comparable to what is reported for patients with moderate to severe CKD. Cancers of the urinary tract (kidney, bladder, urothelial cancer), prostate cancer, cancers of the digestive organs, skin cancers, cancer of the breast and female reproductive organs and lung cancers were among the most frequent cancers among these patients [4, 39, 40]. Whether apoA-IV is a biomarker of selected cancers or causally associated with cancer is currently not known.

Possible explanations for the inverse association of apoA-IV with cancer

A number of biological entities constitute the so-called hallmarks of cancer, with inflammation being one of them [41] in turn increasing the probability for metastasis [42]. The known anti-inflammatory properties of apo-AIV [14, 15] and the link to endothelial function [43], a further component of the tumour microenvironment, could lead to the assumption, that ApoA-IV might be an important marker connected to several pathways in the development of cancer.

In patients with early stages of CKD the risk for cancer is already increased, in particular in males, and the risk increases gradually with more advanced stages of CKD [3]. Two cohort studies reported a stepwise association between severity of CKD and cancer mortality [3]. In turn, CKD is prevalent in approximately 12–25% of cancer patients [39]. Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress are common in patients with advanced CKD and increase with disease progression [44]. About 20–25% of all cancers are discussed to be triggered by chronic infection or inflammation. Several pathways, intracellular signaling cascades and related mechanisms were described that support this hypothesis such as DNA damage, cell damage, proliferation and transformation, immunosuppression, oxidative stress, angiogenesis or abnormal epithelial cell growth [45,46,47]. Thus, such inflammatory processes might be one of the main drivers for the higher risk for cancer in CKD, comparable to that for atherosclerosis [48].

To damage pathogens and protect the organism from harmful antigens, the body releases reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflamed tissue [46]. Antioxidant processes prevent the accumulation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species. An imbalance between the formation of oxidative compounds and antioxidant defense mechanisms leads to oxidative damage [44]. ROS generated during inflammation directly damages proteins and lipids [49], thereby increasing oxidative stress [47]. Inflammation and oxidative stress influence the immune response with an induction of angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis [48, 49]. The experimental evidence of the antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of apoA-IV as shown for atherosclerosis in mice [13,14,15] may also explain the association of increased apoA-IV concentrations and lower number of cancer outcomes and cancer death in the GCKD study. Direct modulatory effects of apoA-IV on oxidation-induced intracellular redox-dependent cell signalling mechanisms were supported by cell culture studies [50].

Generalized endothelial dysfunction is evident in early stages of CKD, leads to albuminuria in the glomeruli and worsens with CKD progression [51]. Endothelial cells release proangiogenic factors which promote coagulation and inflammation [46]. The large endothelial surface of highly vascularized kidney vessels is particularly vulnerable to local proinflammatory effects. Endothelial activation attenuates the local vasodilatory capacity and thus increases the production of ROS and oxidized low-density- lipoprotein cholesterol [44, 48]. While healthy endothelial cells limit tumor growth, invasiveness, and metastasis, dysfunctional ones exposed to the inflammatory tumor microenvironment promote cancer progression, death, and even metastasis through NF-kappa B signaling and other cytokines [46, 48, 52, 53]. ApoA-IV was shown to inhibit NF-κB activity and upregulate the anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic enzyme 24-Dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR24) [43]. Importantly, in vivo, already very low concentrations of apoA-IV could be considered anti-inflammatory [43]. This makes it interesting as a potential therapeutic target. Moreover, as the inhibition of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 but not intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in vitro by lipid-bound apoA-IV was not fully dependent on DHCR24, other pathways besides inhibition of NF-κB might be of relevance for its anti-inflammatory effects [43]. ApoA-IV in its lipid-free and HDL-bound form was described to interact with scavenger receptor class B type 1 [54], which might be one possible alternate pathway. Lipid-bound apoA-IV might also increase the bioavailability of nitric oxide in endothelial cells via different pathways. Taken together, Shearston et al. showed that apoA-IV strongly inhibited acute vascular inflammation in vitro and in vivo [43]. This could be a further link to relevant mechanisms responsible for the lower number of cancer outcomes together with increased apoA-IV concentrations in the GCKD study.

A further explanation for our findings in the GCKD study is the growing evidence that HDL particles and their components including apoA-IV might either be involved in cancer development or might at least have diagnostic utility. A large meta-analysis [55] found an inverse relationship between plasma HDL-C levels and the risk of developing cancer. Cancer cells have an increased need of cholesterol and a disturbed cholesterol metabolism with an increase of intracellular cholesterol esters. This abnormal lipid and cholesterol metabolism in tumor cells can lead to altered plasma lipid levels in cancer patients. Disturbances in the cholesterol homeostasis of the cancer cells can therefore have an influence on progression of cancer as well as survival of cancer cells (reviewed in [55]).

In addition to lipid- and LDL-lowering effects, statins exhibit protective effects against DNA damage, improve endothelial function, and exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, and are associated with a reduced incidence for many cancers, which makes them potentially valuable in cancer prevention [48]. Importantly, the effect of higher apoA-IV concentration on decreased risk for cancer outcomes in the GCKD study was independent of statin use. Furthermore, in a study in hemodialysis patients we found no significant effect of atorvastatin on apoA-IV concentrations [22].

Regardless of the degree of renal dysfunction, CKD patients have a higher risk for venous thromboembolism compared to the general population [56]. Thrombosis-related death is the second most frequent cause in cancer patients [57]. A recent study has shown that apoA-IV reduced αIIbβ3 mediated-platelet aggregation and thus thrombosis. Aspirin or clopidogrel showed similar inhibitory effects as compared to apoA-IV [16]. As CKD and thrombosis, as well as cancer are linked, one mechanism how apoA-IV could be protective for cancer outcomes might be this recently demonstrated strong antithrombotic effect.

It is currently unclear whether apoA-IV concentrations measured in serum reflect the concentrations of apoA-IV in the microenvironment of the cancer and how this influences the survival of cancer cells. A recent study in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma observed markedly decreased apoA-IV concentrations in plasma but a pronounced increase of mRNA in the diseased pancreatic tissue which was linked with a less favourable outcome of the patients. This was surprising since usually RNA expression of apoA-IV in normal pancreas tissue is almost zero [58]. Decreased apoA-IV concentrations in pancreatic cancer were recently confirmed by a study in cats [59].

Strengths and limitations of the study

The main advantage of the current study compared to most of the proteomic studies is the use of a validated ELISA for measurement of apoA-IV and the prospective assessment of cancer outcomes. Particular strengths of the GCKD study are the large sample size based on a well-defined population with a median follow-up of 6.5 years with very low loss to follow-up, the homogeneity of the study population and a centralized assessment of clinical outcomes.

Since the GCKD study is designed as an observational epidemiological study, it cannot determine causality or conclude on possible biological mechanisms. In case the association of apoA-IV with outcomes is not causal it can at least be considered as a promising predictor of risk for cancer. However, the experimental data from earlier studies are in support of a causal involvement of apoA-IV in outcomes involved in inflammatory processes [14,15,16, 60, 61]. A further limitation is that we do not have a replication cohort available and that mainly CKD patients in stage G3 or A3 are included in the GCKD study and therefore findings might not be generalizable to other stages of CKD or the general population. However, previous proteomic studies mostly done in serum or plasma revealed that apoA-IV is reduced in many cancer types (for overview see Supplementary Table 1). Furthermore, we cannot exclude residual confounding by unknown or unmeasured confounders. Finally, apoA-IV was measured in serum and no organ-specific cancer tissue was available which would have allowed to analyse the apoA-IV expression in cancer tissue.

Conclusions

This large prospective study in patients with mild to severe chronic kidney disease revealed an independent association of high apoA-IV concentrations with a lower odds for a history of cancer before enrolment and a lower risk for fatal and non-fatal incident cancer outcomes. The known antioxidative, antiinflammatory and potentially also antithrombotic properties of apoA-IV might be an explanation for the observed associations. Supported by existing proteomic data this could mean a value of high apoA-IV indicating a reduced risk for cancer in CKD patients. However, the clinical utility requires further investigations of various cancer entities in large cohorts to define optimal thresholds for further clinical and extended examinations of patients in case a cancer is suspected due to decreased apoA-IV concentrations.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

ApoA-IV:

Apolipoprotein A-IV

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

DHCR24:

24-Dehydrocholesterol reductase

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

eGFRcys:

EGFR based on cystatin C

eGFRcrea:

EGFR based on creatinine

GCKD Study:

German Chronic Kidney Disease Study

HR:

Hazard ratio

hs-CRP:

High sensitivity C reactive protein

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

UACR:

Urine albumin creatinine ratio

References

  1. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Jafar TH, Nitsch D, Neuen BL, Perkovic V. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):786–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Malyszko J, Tesarova P, Capasso G, Capasso A. The link between kidney disease and cancer: complications and treatment. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):277–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lees JS, Ho F, Parra-Soto S, Celis-Morales C, Welsh P, Sullivan MK, Jani BD, Sattar N, Lang NN, Pell JP, et al. Kidney function and cancer risk: an analysis using creatinine and cystatin C in a cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, Bohm M, Marx N. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation. 2021;143(11):1157–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Crusz SM, Balkwill FR. Inflammation and cancer: advances and new agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(10):584–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amiri FS. Serum tumor markers in chronic kidney disease: as clinical tool in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cancers. Ren Fail. 2016;38(4):530–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Utermann G, Beisiegel U. Apolipoprotein A-IV: a protein occurring in human mesenteric lymph chylomicrons and free in plasma. Isolation and quantification. Eur J Biochem. 1979;99:333–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green PHR, Glickman RM, Riley JW, Qinet E. Human apolipoprotein A-IV. Intestinal origin and distribution in plasma. J Clin Invest. 1980;65:911–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang F, Kohan AB, Lo CM, Liu M, Howles P, Tso P. Apolipoprotein A-IV: a protein intimately involved in metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2015;56:1403–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ezeh B, Haiman M, Alber HF, Kunz B, Paulweber B, Kraft HG, Weidinger F, Pachinger O, Dieplinger H, Kronenberg F. Plasma distribution of apoA-IV in patients with coronary artery disease and healthy controls. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:1523–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein O, Stein Y, Lefevre M, Roheim PS. The role of apolipoprotein A-IV in reverse cholesterol transport studied with cultured cells and liposomes derived from another analog of phosphatidylcholine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986;878:7–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kronenberg F. Apolipoprotein L1 and apolipoprotein A-IV and their association with kidney function. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2017;28:39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vowinkel T, Mori M, Krieglstein CF, Russell J, Saijo F, Bharwani S, Turnage RH, Davidson WS, Tso P, Granger DN, et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV inhibits experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:260–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Recalde D, Ostos MA, Badell E, Garcia-Otin AL, Pidoux J, Castro G, Zakin MM, Scott-Algara D. Human apolipoprotein A-IV reduces secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and atherosclerotic effects of a chronic infection mimicked by lipopolysaccharide. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(4):756–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu XR, Wang Y, Adili R, Ju L, Spring CM, Jin JW, Yang H, Neves MAD, Chen P, Yang Y, et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV binds alphaIIbbeta3 integrin and inhibits thrombosis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3608.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Haiman M, Salvenmoser W, Scheiber K, Lingenhel A, Rudolph C, Schmitz G, Kronenberg F, Dieplinger H. Immunohistochemical localization of apolipoprotein A-IV in human kidney tissue. Kidney Int. 2005;68:1130–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stangl S, Kollerits B, Lamina C, Meisinger C, Huth C, Stoeckl A, Daehnhardt D, Boeger CA, Kraemer BK, Peters A, et al. Association between apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations and chronic kidney disease in two large population-based cohorts: results from the KORA studies. J Intern Med. 2015;278(4):410–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boes E, Fliser D, Ritz E, König P, Lhotta K, Mann JFE, Müller GA, Neyer U, Riegel W, Riegler P, et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV predicts progression of chronic kidney disease: the mild to moderate kidney disease study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:528–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kronenberg F, Stühlinger M, Trenkwalder E, Geethanjali FS, Pachinger O, Von Eckardstein A, Dieplinger H. Low apolipoprotein A-IV plasma concentrations in men with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:751–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Song M, Qian D, Lu W, Wang J, Jiang G, Jin J, Wu X, Huang L. Decreased plasma apolipoprotein A-IV levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Invest Med. 2013;36:E207–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kollerits B, Krane V, Drechsler C, Lamina C, Maerz W, Ritz E, Wanner C, Kronenberg F. Apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations and clinical outcomes in haemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - a post hoc analysis of the 4D Study. J Intern Med. 2012;272(6):592–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwaiger JP, Kollerits B, Steinbrenner I, Weissensteiner H, Schonherr S, Forer L, Kotsis F, Lamina C, Schneider MP, Schultheiss UT, et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations and clinical outcomes in a large chronic kidney disease cohort: results from the GCKD study. J Intern Med. 2022;291(5):622–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dieplinger H, Ankerst DP, Burges A, Lenhard M, Lingenhel A, Fineder L, Buchner H, Stieber P. Afamin and apolipoprotein A-IV: novel protein markers for ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1127–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorkova L, Pospisilova J, Lacheta J, Leahomschi S, Zivny J, Cibula D, Zivny J, Petrak J. Decreased concentrations of retinol-binding protein 4 in sera of epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a potential biomarker identified by proteomics. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(2):318–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Timms JF, Arslan-Low E, Kabir M, Worthington J, Camuzeaux S, Sinclair J, Szaub J, Afrough B, Podust VN, Fourkala EO, et al. Discovery of serum biomarkers of ovarian cancer using complementary proteomic profiling strategies. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014;8:982–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bharali D, Banerjee BD, Bharadwaj M, Husain SA, Kar P. Expression analysis of apolipoproteins AI & AIV in hepatocellular carcinoma: a protein-based hepatocellular carcinoma-associated study. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147(4):361–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Abulaizi M, Tomonaga T, Satoh M, Sogawa K, Matsushita K, Kodera Y, Obul J, Takano S, Yoshitomi H, Miyazaki M, et al. The application of a three-step proteome analysis for identification of new biomarkers of pancreatic cancer. Int J Proteomics. 2011;2011:628787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang SC, Lin WL, Chang YF, Lee CT, Wu JS, Hsu PH, Chang CF. Glycoproteomic identification of novel plasma biomarkers for oral cancer. J Food Drug Anal. 2019;27(2):483–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrokhi Yekta R, Arefi Oskouie A, Rezaei Tavirani M, Mohajeri-Tehrani MR, Soroush AR. Decreased apolipoprotein A4 and increased complement component 3 as potential markers for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a proteomic study. Int J Biol Markers. 2018;33(4):455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li D, Wu J, Liu Z, Qiu L, Zhang Y. Novel circulating protein biomarkers for thyroid cancer determined through data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Eckardt KU, Barthlein B, Baid-Agrawal S, Beck A, Busch M, Eitner F, Ekici AB, Floege J, Gefeller O, Haller H, et al. The German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study: design and methods. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1454–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Titze S, Schmid M, Kottgen A, Busch M, Floege J, Wanner C, Kronenberg F, Eckardt KU. Disease burden and risk profile in referred patients with moderate chronic kidney disease: composition of the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:441–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van LF, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kronenberg F, Lobentanz E-M, König P, Utermann G, Dieplinger H. Effect of sample storage on the measurement of lipoprotein(a), apolipoproteins B and A-IV, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1318–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kronenberg F, König P, Neyer U, Auinger M, Pribasnig A, Lang U, Reitinger J, Pinter G, Utermann G, Dieplinger H. Multicenter study of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:110–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Allin KH, Nordestgaard BG, Zacho J, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE. C-reactive protein and the risk of cancer: a mendelian randomization study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(3):202–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. GFR estimation: from physiology to public health. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(5):820–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Porta C, Bamias A, Danesh FR, Debska-Slizien A, Gallieni M, Gertz MA, Kielstein JT, Tesarova P, Wong G, Cheung M, et al. KDIGO controversies conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancer. Kidney Int. 2020;98(5):1108–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lees JS, Elyan BMP, Herrmann SM, Lang NN, Jones RJ, Mark PB. The ‘other’ big complication: how chronic kidney disease impacts on cancer risks and outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(5):1071–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lazebnik Y. What are the hallmarks of cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(4):232–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shearston K, Tan JTM, Cochran BJ, Rye KA. Inhibition of Vascular Inflammation by Apolipoprotein A-IV. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:901408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ebert T, Neytchev O, Witasp A, Kublickiene K, Stenvinkel P, Shiels PG. Inflammation and oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;35(17):1426–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–7.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Vidal-Vanaclocha F. Inflammation in the molecular pathogenesis of cancer and atherosclerosis. Reumatol Clin. 2009;5(Suppl 1):40–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Murata M. Inflammation and cancer. Environ Health Prev Med. 2018;23(1):50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Masoudkabir F, Sarrafzadegan N, Gotay C, Ignaszewski A, Krahn AD, Davis MK, Franco C, Mani A. Cardiovascular disease and cancer: Evidence for shared disease pathways and pharmacologic prevention. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:343–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Volovat SR, Volovat C, Miron I, Kanbay M, Goldsmith D, Lungulescu C, Badarau SC, Covic A. Oncogenic mechanisms in renal insufficiency. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(2):507–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Spaulding HL, Saijo F, Turnage RH, Alexander JS, Aw TY, Kalogeris TJ. Apolipoprotein A-IV attenuates oxidant-induced apoptosis in mitotic competant, undifferentiated cells by modulating intracellular glutathione redox balance. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;290:C95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Satoh M. Endothelial dysfunction as an underlying pathophysiological condition of chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2012;16(4):518–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Malhab LJB, Saber-Ayad MM, Al-Hakm R, Nair VA, Paliogiannis P, Pintus G, Abdel-Rahman WM. Chronic inflammation and cancer: the role of endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(18):2156–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Franses JW, Drosu NC, Gibson WJ, Chitalia VC, Edelman ER. Dysfunctional endothelial cells directly stimulate cancer inflammation and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(6):1334–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Duka A, Fotakis P, Georgiadou D, Kateifides A, Tzavlaki K, von Eckardstein L, Stratikos E, Kardassis D, Zannis VI. ApoA-IV promotes the biogenesis of apoA-IV-containing HDL particles with the participation of ABCA1 and LCAT. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(1):107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ganjali S, Ricciuti B, Pirro M, Butler AE, Atkin SL, Banach M, Sahebkar A. High-density lipoprotein components and functionality in cancer: state-of-the-art. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019;30(1):12–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cheung CYS, Parikh J, Farrell A, Lefebvre M, Summa-Sorgini C, Battistella M. Direct oral anticoagulant use in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients with venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of thrombosis and bleeding outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(6):711–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fernandes CJ, Morinaga LTK, Alves JL Jr, Castro MA, Calderaro D, Jardim CVP, Souza R. Cancer-associated thrombosis: the when, how and why. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28(151):180119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Peng H, Pan S, Yan Y, Brand RE, Petersen GM, Chari ST, Lai LA, Eng JK, Brentnall TA, Chen R. Systemic proteome alterations linked to early stage pancreatic cancer in diabetic patients. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Nabeta R, Katselis GS, Chumala P, Dickinson R, Fernandez NJ, Meachem MD. Identification of potential plasma protein biomarkers for feline pancreatic carcinoma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Vet Comp Oncol. 2022;20(3):720–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cohen RD, Castellani LW, Qiao JH, Van Lenten BJ, Lusis AJ, Reue K. Reduced aortic lesions and elevated high density lipoprotein levels in transgenic mice overexpressing mouse apolipoprotein A-IV. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1906–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Duverger N, Tremp G, Caillaud JM, Emmanuel F, Castro G, Fruchart JC, Steinmetz A, Denèfle P. Protection against atherogenesis in mice mediated by human apolipoprotein A-IV. Science. 1996;273(5277):966–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the willingness of the patients to participate in the GCKD study. The enormous effort of the study personnel of the various regional centers is highly appreciated. We thank the nephrologists who provide routine care for the patients and collaborate with the GCKD study (the list of nephrologists currently collaborating with the GCKD study is available at http://www.gckd.org).

Current GCKD Investigators and Collaborators with the GCKD Study are:

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg: Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Heike Meiselbach, Markus P. Schneider, Mario Schiffer, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Barbara Bärthlein, Andreas Beck, André Reis, Arif B. Ekici, Susanne Becker, Ulrike Alberth-Schmidt, Anke Weigel, Sabine Marschall, Eugenia Schefler;

University of Freiburg: Gerd Walz, Anna Köttgen, Ulla T. Schultheiß, Fruzsina Kotsis, Simone Meder, Erna Mitsch, Ursula Reinhard;

RWTH Aachen University: Jürgen Floege, Turgay Saritas, Alice Gross;

Charité, University Medicine Berlin: Elke Schaeffner, Seema Baid-Agrawal, Kerstin Theisen;

Hannover Medical School: Hermann Haller;

University of Heidelberg: Martin Zeier, Claudia Sommerer, Mehtap Aykac;

University of Jena: Gunter Wolf, Martin Busch, Andy Steiner;

Ludwig-Maximilians University of München: Thomas Sitter;

University of Würzburg: Christoph Wanner, Vera Krane, Antje Börner-Klein, Britta Bauer;

Medical University of Innsbruck, Institute of Genetic Epidemiology: Florian Kronenberg, Barbara Kollerits, Lukas Forer, Sebastian Schönherr, Hansi Weissensteiner;

University of Regensburg, Institute of Functional Genomics: Peter Oefner, Wolfram Gronwald;

University of Bonn, Institute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty: Matthias Schmid, Jennifer Nadal.

Funding

This research was funded in whole or in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [grant DOI: 10.55776/W1253]. For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. The GCKD study is supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, FKZ 01ER 0804, 01ER 0818, 01ER 0819, 01ER 0820, and 01ER 0821) and the KfH Foundation for Preventive Medicine (Kuratorium für Heimdialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V. – Stiftung Präventivmedizin) and corporate sponsors (www.gckd.org). The funding source had no involvement in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Schöpfstraße 41, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria

    Barbara Kollerits, Simon Gruber, Johannes P. Schwaiger, Hansi Weissensteiner, Sebastian Schönherr, Lukas Forer & Florian Kronenberg

  2. Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Inga Steinbrenner, Fruzsina Kotsis & Ulla T. Schultheiss

  3. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Heike Meiselbach & Kai-Uwe Eckardt

  4. German Chronic Kidney Disease Study, Erlangen, Germany

    Heike Meiselbach & Kai-Uwe Eckardt

  5. Department of Medicine IV – Nephrology and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Fruzsina Kotsis & Ulla T. Schultheiss

  6. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Christoph Wanner

  7. Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Kai-Uwe Eckardt

Authors
  1. Barbara Kollerits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Inga Steinbrenner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes P. Schwaiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hansi Weissensteiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sebastian Schönherr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lukas Forer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fruzsina Kotsis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ulla T. Schultheiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Heike Meiselbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christoph Wanner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kai-Uwe Eckardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Florian Kronenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the GCKD Investigators

  • Kai-Uwe Eckardt
  • , Heike Meiselbach
  • , Markus P. Schneider
  • , Mario Schiffer
  • , Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
  • , Barbara Bärthlein
  • , Andreas Beck
  • , André Reis
  • , Arif B. Ekici
  • , Susanne Becker
  • , Ulrike Alberth-Schmidt
  • , Anke Weigel
  • , Sabine Marschall
  • , Eugenia Schefler
  • , Gerd Walz
  • , Anna Köttgen
  • , Ulla T. Schultheiß
  • , Fruzsina Kotsis
  • , Simone Meder
  • , Erna Mitsch
  • , Ursula Reinhard
  • , Jürgen Floege
  • , Turgay Saritas
  • , Alice Gross
  • , Elke Schaeffner
  • , Seema Baid-Agrawal
  • , Kerstin Theisen
  • , Hermann Haller
  • , Martin Zeier
  • , Claudia Sommerer
  • , Mehtap Aykac
  • , Gunter Wolf
  • , Martin Busch
  • , Andy Steiner
  • , Thomas Sitter
  • , Christoph Wanner
  • , Vera Krane
  • , Antje Börner-Klein
  • , Britta Bauer
  • , Florian Kronenberg
  • , Barbara Kollerits
  • , Lukas Forer
  • , Sebastian Schönherr
  • , Hansi Weissensteiner
  • , Peter Oefner
  • , Wolfram Gronwald
  • , Matthias Schmid
  •  & Jennifer Nadal

Contributions

Barbara Kollerits: Conceptualization, data curation, methodology, analyses, writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript. Simon Gruber: Data analyses, methodology, writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript. Inga Steinbrenner: Data curation, investigation and validation, reviewing and editing manuscript. Johannes P. Schwaiger: Conceptualization, reviewing and editing manuscript. Hansi Weissensteiner: Data curation, software, reviewing and editing manuscript. Sebastian Schönherr Data curation, software; reviewing and editing manuscript. Lukas Forer: Data curation, software; reviewing and editing manuscript. Fruzsina Kotsis: Data curation; investigation and validation, reviewing and editing manuscript. Ulla T. Schultheiss: Data curation, investigation and validation, methodology, reviewing and editing the manuscript. Heike Meiselbach: Data curation, investigation and validation, reviewing and editing the manuscript. Christoph Wanner: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, data investigation, reviewing and editing manuscript. Kai-Uwe Eckardt: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, data investigation, reviewing and editing manuscript. Florian Kronenberg: Conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, project administration and supervision, writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Kronenberg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Each participant provided written informed consent, and all methods were performed in accordance with approved guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Re.-No. 3831) and registered in the national registry for clinical studies (DRKS 00003971).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Note: The results presented in this manuscript were part of the diploma thesis of Simon Gruber for graduation at the Medical School of the Medical University of Innsbruck.

The original version of this article was revised: “The affiliation of Inga Steinbrenner has been corrected.”

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The online supplementary material (Supplementary Tables_ApoA-IV_CA.pdf) contains a literature overview on proteomics and case –control studies that investigated apolipoprotein A-IV in various cancer types (Supplementary Table 1), distribution of type of cancer during the prospective observation period (Supplementary Table 2) further baseline characteristics of the GCKD cohort (Supplementary Table 3) as well as additional data analyses on the association of apolipoprotein A-IV with cancer outcomes (Supplementary Table 4-13).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kollerits, B., Gruber, S., Steinbrenner, I. et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations and cancer in a large cohort of chronic kidney disease patients: results from the GCKD study. BMC Cancer 24, 320 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12053-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12053-8

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us