Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with response-directed definitive therapy in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a phase II study protocol (SHAMROCK study)

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 91 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The current standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk HER2-positive (HER2 +) breast cancer is to combine systemic chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. To improve treatment-associated toxicity, chemotherapy-sparing approaches are currently being investigated. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an HER2-directed antibody–drug-conjugate (ADC) with promising results in the metastatic setting for HER2-positive breast cancer. The SHAMROCK study investigates neoadjuvant T-DXd in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, using pathological complete response (pCR) rate as the primary endpoint.

Methods

This is a phase II open-label, single arm, adaptive multi-centre trial of T-DXd in the neoadjuvant setting in stage 2–3 HER2-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients will receive 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. A repeat biopsy will performed after 2 cycles for the RNA disruption index (RDI) score assessment. According to their likelihood of pCR, as determined by the RDI score, patients will either undergo 4 or 6 cycles of T-DXd prior to imaging. Patients with imaging complete response (iCR) after either 4 or 6 cycles will proceed to surgery. Patients who do not achieve iCR will either undergo further systemic therapy or proceed to surgery.

Discussion

The SHAMROCK study is a chemotherapy-sparing approach to curative intent treatment, investigating neoadjuvant T-DXd. We hypothesise that neoadjuvant T-DXd will have a high pCR rate and be associated low toxicity in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Trial registration

EudraCT Number: 2022–002485-32; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05710666; Cancer Trials Ireland study number: CTRIAL-IE 22–01.

Background

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is over-expressed and/or amplified in 15–20% of all breast cancers. HER2-targeted therapies, such as the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, have significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with HER2-positive (HER2 +) breast cancer. The current standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable high-risk HER2 + breast cancer is to combine chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, for a synergistic anti-tumour effect [1, 2]. Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is associated with favourable survival outcomes [3], and can be used to individualise adjuvant systemic therapy. In patients with residual disease at surgery, improvements in disease-free-survival (DFS) have been seen with the addition of adjuvant trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), as demonstrated in the KATHERINE trial [4].

Systemic chemotherapy is associated with significant short and long term side effects, including but not limited to alopecia, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, life-threatening cytopenias and infections, infertility and secondary malignancies in later life. In the KRISTINE trial a chemotherapy-sparing approach with neoadjuvant T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab showed promising results, with a favourable toxicity profile [5]. However, this regimen has not been incorporated into routine practice due to a higher incidence of locoregional progression events prior to surgery. The lack of available biomarkers to guide pre-operative therapy by identifying patients in whom chemotherapy can be safely omitted is an area of unmet need [5, 6].

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an ADC combining an anti-HER2 antibody, a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload [7]. The efficacy of T-DXd for advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer after progression on T-DM1 was established in the DESTINY-Breast01 trial [8] and confirmed in the randomised phase 3 DESTINY-Breast02 [9] trial. The rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the DESTINY-Breast03 trial, with a median treatment duration of 14.3 months, was 52.1% in a cohort of patients with pre-treated metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on trastuzumab and a taxane [10]. By way of comparison to a population of fit and treatment-naive patients with locoregional disease in the breast and axilla only, the rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the chemotherapy arm of the KRISTINE trial was 64.4% [5].

The ribonucleic acid (RNA) disruption index (RDI) score is a molecular test based on the analysis of RNA disruption, a qualitative and quantitative alteration of the ribosomal RNA of tumour cells that correlates with chemotherapy response in primary breast cancer [11, 12]. The RDI score has also been shown to predict pCR after as early as one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer [13, 14]. To optimise pCR rates, the RDI score will be used as a biomarker for on-treatment tissue, together with breast imaging, to guide the use of pre-operative chemotherapy.

Therefore, we hypothesise that neoadjuvant T-DXd will have a high pCR rate and be associated with low toxicity in the early stages of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Trial design

The SHAMROCK study is a phase 2 open label, single-arm, adaptive multicentre trial. Patients with early stage (stage 2–3) HER2-positive breast cancer are treated with neoadjuvant T-DXd every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. A repeat biopsy after 2 cycles (at cycle 2 day 14) of T-DXd is performed for the RDI score assessment. As a safety measure patients will undergo clinical examination before each cycle of T-DXd to enable early identification of on-treatment locoregional progression. If progression is seen, then T-DXd will be stopped, and the patient taken off study treatment. In the absence of early progression, those patients with a high chance of pCR based on the RDI score undergo repeat breast imaging after four cycles of T-DXd. Patients who have a high chance of pCR based on the RDI score proceed to surgery after four cycles of T-DXd if they also have imaging complete response (iCR) at that point. Other patients who have a high chance of pCR based on the RDI score but iCR is not attained after four cycles or who have a low/intermediate chance of pCR based on the RDI score undergo repeat breast imaging after six cycles of T-DXd. Patients with iCR after six cycles of T-DXd, regardless of RDI score, proceed to surgery. Patients who have a low/intermediate chance of pCR based on the RDI score and residual disease on imaging after six cycles of T-DXd will undergo either further systemic therapy or proceed to surgery (at the discretion of their treating physician). Regardless of whether the patient will proceed to surgery or undergo further systemic therapy the maximum number of cycles of T-DXd is six cycles. Based on the surgical specimen, patients who achieve a pCR will undergo further trastuzumab post-operatively as per standard of care to complete a total of 52 weeks of systemic therapy from the first cycle of T-DXd. Patients with residual disease at surgery will receive adjuvant chemotherapy as decided by the treating physician. The study design is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study Schema of SHAMROCK study. Abbreviations: RDI RNA disruption index, T-DXd trastuzumab deruxtecan, iCR imaging complete response

Full size image

Patients

The main inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: newly diagnosed histologically confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer, age ≥ 18 years, stage 2–3 breast cancer, no prior therapy received for breast cancer, ECOG performance status 0–1 and adequate organ function. Patients with lung-specific intercurrent clinically significant illnesses, any autoimmune or inflammatory disorders with pulmonary involvement or prior pneumonectomy are excluded. Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Key eligibility criteria
Full size table

Treatment

Trastuzumab deruxtecan: 5.4 mg/kg administered as an intravenous infusion on day 1, every 3 weeks.

Eligible patients will receive a total of either 4 or 6 cycles of T-DXd. Dose modifications and treatment interruptions are allowed and must be done according to the guidelines in the summary of product characteristics [15]. If treatment has been delayed for more than 4 weeks from the planned date of administration, the patient is withdrawn from the study treatment.

Objectives

Primary objective

To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd in the neo-adjuvant treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer using pathological complete response (pCR) as the primary endpoint.

Secondary objectives

  1. 1.

    To determine the Event-free survival (EFS) and Overall survival (OS) of patients treated with only T-DXd and trastuzumab.

  2. 2.

    To determine EFS and OS of patients treated with systemic therapy other than trastuzumab in addition to T-DXd.

  3. 3.

    To determine EFS and OS of the entire study population.

  4. 4.

    To compare EFS and OS between patients achieving vs not achieving pCR at surgery.

  5. 5.

    To study molecular evolution of tumours during treatment and to develop a biomarker panel that optimises prediction of the pCR.

  6. 6.

    To determine the percentage of patients who achieve pCR after only 4 cycles of T-DXd.

  7. 7.

    To explore the performance metrics (Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity) for prediction pCR of RDI, imaging and tomosynthesis biopsy, alone and in combination.

Data collection and management

Study data will be handled confidentially. The study data will be collected using electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs). Clinical trial data will be entered by authorised site personnel into the electronic data capture system. The investigator must maintain accurate documentation (source data) that supports the information entered in the eCRF. The investigator is responsible for verifying that data entries are accurate and correct by signing the eCRF. All data will be reviewed for completeness and logical consistency queries will be generated via the electronic data capture system to correct or clarify data or request missing information. The designated site staff will be required to respond to these queries in accordance with data entry and data query timelines for the study. Ongoing source data verification will be performed to confirm that data entered into the eCRF by authorised site personnel are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents; that the safety and rights of participants are being protected; and that the study is being conducted in accordance with the currently approved protocol and any other study agreements, ICH GCP, and all applicable regulatory requirements. A Project Management File (PMF) will be maintained for the duration of the study.

Safety and monitoring

All adverse events will be reported routinely on the eCRF. Intensity for each adverse event will be determined by using the current version 5.0 of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) [16], wherever possible. In cases where these criteria do not apply, intensity should be defined according to the general clinical description of grades as per CTCAE. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be reported to the sponsor within 24 h of the study site becoming aware of the event. Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) will be reported to the Ethics Committee, EudraVigilance and local regulatory authorities where required. The study will be reviewed on a regular basis by the Safety Monitoring Committee. The Safety Monitoring Committee will report its assessment of the continuing benefit-risk of the study and any recommended actions to the Chief Investigator and the Clinical Lead for consideration and appropriate action.

Biomarker analysis

Tumour tissue will be collected from the baseline biopsy and surgical pathological specimen. This tissue will be used for DNA/RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis. A fresh tumour tissue biopsy will also be collected after completing 2 cycles of therapy, which will be used to calculate the patient’s RDI score. Patient blood samples will be collected at screening and prior to each cycle of treatment. These samples will be used for circulating tumour DNA and RNA analysis and protein biomarker analysis. This translational analysis aims to identify clinically relevant biomarkers to predict benefit or resistance to treatment, and to facilitate future studies.

Statistical methods

Sample size calculation was performed for the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients who are successfully treated (achieve pCR at surgery) with only T-DXd and trastuzumab. The preliminary data for the statistical design of our study came from our prior JNCI publication [13]. In this publication, the proportion of HER2 + tumours that were RDI score high with neoadjuvant TCH chemo (6 cycles total) was 41%. The pCR rate with a high RDI score was 83% and the pCR rate with a non-high RDI score was 10% [13]. The former percentage was rounded down a little (on the conservative side), and the latter was rounded up to 20% to allow for the effect of the receipt of optional additional preoperative chemotherapy for the purposes of the design of our study herein. There are no pCR data with T-DXd yet. The pCR rate with T-DM1 (four cycles) in the German ADAPT trial [17] was 41%. These are the data points that we used as a foundation for the statistical design of our trial herein.

Given expected pCR rates of 80% and 20% for the RDI high and non-RDI high groups respectively, the expected pCR rate after surgery for the study as a whole is 44%. Because reported pCR rates in unselected patients with standard HER2 directed neoadjuvant therapy are generally up to 50%, 60% is the minimum acceptable limit for likelihood of pCR in patients selected by high RDI score after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant T-DXd. Similarly, the minimum acceptable limit for likelihood of pCR in patients with non-high RDI score is 10%. Given minimum acceptable limits for expected pCR of 60% and 10% for the RDI high and non-RDI high groups respectively, the minimum acceptable limit for expected pCR rate after surgery for the study as a whole is 30%.

For an expected pCR rate after surgery 44%, a sample size of 74 evaluable patients would provide a 95% confidence interval (Wilson method) with a lower bound of 30% for the pCR rate (equivalent to providing statistical power of 80% to test an expected pCR rate of 44% versus an unacceptable pCR of 30%, using a one-sided significance level of 5%). Allowing for a non-evaluable rate of 5–10%, a total sample size of 80 patients should provide 74 evaluable patients, where an evaluable patient is defined as a patient who is evaluated for pCR after surgery. Patients should also have biopsy at Cycle 2 Day 14 ± 4 days for the RDI score assessment, receive a minimum of 4 T-DXd infusions and undergo surgery in order to be considered as evaluable for the primary endpoint.

The primary outcome will be presented along with the 95% exact binomial CI. If the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval exceeds 30%, we can conclude that an unacceptable pCR rate of 30% can be rejected.

EFS and OS will be estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, with 95% CI for the set of patients treated with only T-DXd followed by trastuzumab. Comparisons between the two sets of patients in DFS and OS will be made using the Log-rank test, presenting the estimated hazard ratio together with 95% CI.

Ethical aspects and trial registration

The SHAMROCK trial was approved by the National Office for Research Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials (NREC-CT), the NREC for Clinical Investigations of Medical Devices and Performance Studies of In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (NREC-MD), the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) and the HPRA Medical Devices (HPRA-MD). The trial was registered in the European drug regulatory affairs Clinical Trials database (Eudra-CT 2022–002485-32, June 30, 2022) and ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05710666).

Discussion

Neoadjuvant therapy is the current standard of care for treating ≥ T2 or node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer [18]. Treatment generally consists of a combination of dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, together with a chemotherapy backbone, based on results of the NeoSphere trial [1]. Established neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens include docetaxel-carboplatin or an anthracycline-taxane course, with dual antibody blockade. While these regimens have been highly effective, they are associated with significant side effects and toxicity, including febrile neutropenia and cardiotoxicity. The TRAIN-2 trial reported that there is no increased efficacy with an anthracycline containing regimen compared to a taxane-platinum regimen, while cardiac toxicity was higher in the anthracycline containing arm [19]. More recently, the possibility of replacing systemic chemotherapy with a targeted agent associated with less toxicity has been investigated. In the phase II KRISTINE study, neoadjuvant T-DM1 plus pertuzumab was compared to standard chemotherapy with dual HER2-blockade. While the pCR rate was significantly higher with conventional systemic chemotherapy (44.4% vs 55.7%), the rate of grade 3 or greater adverse events was significantly lower in the T-DM1 plus pertuzumab arm (31.8% vs 67.7%) [5].

T-DXd is an ADC which has shown great efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer [20]. It has a significantly higher drug-to-antibody ratio than T-DM1, however the stability of the linker appears to improve efficacy, without marked side effects [21]. The cytotoxic payload, DXd, is also cell membrane permeable, which enables elimination of both target tumor cells and the surrounding tumor cells, known as the bystander antitumor effect [22]. T-DXd showed a substantial benefit in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had received prior treatment with T-DM1 in the DESTINY-Breast01 trial [8]. In DESTINY-Breast03, a significantly higher progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) was reported with T-DXd compared to T-DM1 in HER2-positivie metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane [23]. Furthermore, T-DXd was found to be superior to the physicians choice of chemotherapy in patients who had progressed on T-DM1, showing that it could overcome resistance to another ADC [9].

Based on the promising results of T-DXd in the advanced/metastatic setting, adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials were designed. Adjuvant T-DXd is being investigated in the ongoing DESTINY-Breast05 trial, comparing T-DXd to T-DM1 in patients with residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy [24]. Neoadjuvant T-DXd is also currently being evaluated in the DESTINY-Breast11 trial in locally advanced or inflammatory HER2-positive breast cancer [25]. The SHAMROCK study will investigate neoadjuvant T-DXd in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, incorporating therapy escalation and de-escalation strategies as described above.

The SHAMROCK study will use pCR as the primary endpoint. pCR at surgery is correlated with favourable patient outcomes, particularly in HER2-positive, hormone-receptor negative (HR-) breast cancer, as shown by the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [3]. Numerous additional meta-analyses have subsequently supported the value of pCR as an informative surrogate biomarker for improved survival in HER2-positive breast cancer [26,27,28]. To optimise pCR rates, the RDI score will be used as a biomarker for on-treatment tissue to guide neoadjuvant chemotherapy escalation or de-escalation. The RDI score will be performed on a biopsy after 2 cycles of T-DXd (cycle 2 day 14 ± 4), which will provide an opportunity to adapt treatment and potentially avoid additional cycles of ineffective therapy.

This phase II study will investigate neoadjuvant T-DXd in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. We hypothesise that this novel adaptive trial design will achieve high pCR rates and avoid unnecessary toxicity, while also exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers for treatment.

Trial status

The SHAMROCK study is a nationwide multicentre phase 2, open-label, single-arm trial. The study opened for accrual on 26th October 2023.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADC:

Antibody–drug conjugate

AESI:

Adverse events of special interest

CI:

Confidence interval

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

DFS:

Disease-free survival

eCRF:

Electronic case report form

EFS:

Event-free survival

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor 2

HPRA:

Health Products Regulatory Authority

HR:

Hormone-receptor

ICH GCP:

International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Guideline for Good Clinical Practice

iCR:

Imaging complete response

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

NREC:

National Office for Research Ethics Committee

ORR:

Overall response rate

OS:

Overall survival

pCR:

Pathological complete response

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PMF:

Project Management File

RDI:

RNA disruption index

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

SAE:

Serious adverse event

SUSAR:

Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction

T-DM1:

Trastuzumab emtansine

T-DXd:

Trastuzumab-deruxtecan

References

  1. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowling GP, Keelan S, Toomey S, Daly GR, Hennessy BT, Hill ADK. Review of the status of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1066007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Untch M, et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Jung KH, Huang CS, Harbeck N, Valero V, et al. Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: Three-Year Outcomes From the Phase III KRISTINE Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(25):2206–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hennessy MA, Morris PG. Optimizing Anti-HER2 Therapy in early breast cancer: updates from the KRISTINE trial. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(2):504–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH. Enhertu 100 mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion: EU summary of product characteristics. 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 01 Aug 2023. [

  8. Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, Park YH, Kim SB, Tamura K, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):610–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. André F, Hee Park Y, Kim SB, Takano T, Im SA, Borges G, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10390):1773–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortés J, Kim S-B, Chung W-P, Im S-A, Park YH, Hegg R, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1143–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pritzker K, Pritzker L, Generali D, Bottini A, Cappelletti MR, Guo B, et al. RNA Disruption and Drug Response in Breast Cancer Primary Systemic Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2015;2015(51):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parissenti AM, Guo B, Pritzker LB, Pritzker KP, Wang X, Zhu M, et al. Tumor RNA disruption predicts survival benefit from breast cancer chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(1):135–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Toomey S, Eustace AJ, Pritzker LB, Pritzker KP, Fay J, O'Grady A, et al. RE: RNA Disruption Assay as a Biomarker of Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(8).

  14. Trudeau M. Response. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(8).

  15. Enhertu SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS [Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/enhertu-epar-product-information_en.pdf.

  16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Insitute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. 2017. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_ v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf. [

  17. Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Kates RE, Braun M, Küemmel S, et al. De-Escalation Strategies in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Early Breast Cancer (BC): Final Analysis of the West German Study Group Adjuvant Dynamic Marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy Trial Optimizing Risk Assessment and Therapy Response Prediction in Early BC HER2- and Hormone Receptor-Positive Phase II Randomized Trial-Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Markers for 12 Weeks of Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine With or Without Endocrine Therapy (ET) Versus Trastuzumab Plus ET. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(26):3046–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, Anders CK, Chandarlapaty S, Crews JR, et al. Systemic Therapy for Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(23):2612–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Voort A, van Ramshorst MS, van Werkhoven ED, Mandjes IA, Kemper I, Vulink AJ, et al. Three-Year Follow-up of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Anthracyclines in the Presence of Dual ERBB2 Blockade in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the TRAIN-2 Randomized, Phase 3 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(7):978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dowling GP, Daly GR, Keelan S, Boland F, Toomey S, Hill ADK, et al. Efficacy & Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Breast Cancer: A Systematic review & Meta-analysis. Clinical Breast Cancer. 2023.

  21. Xu Z, Guo D, Jiang Z, Tong R, Jiang P, Bai L, et al. Novel HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugates of Trastuzumab Beyond T-DM1 in Breast Cancer: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan(DS-8201a) and (Vic-)Trastuzumab Duocarmazine (SYD985). Eur J Med Chem. 2019;183: 111682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogitani Y, Hagihara K, Oitate M, Naito H, Agatsuma T. Bystander killing effect of DS-8201a, a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate, in tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(7):1039–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, Im SA, Jacot W, Ganju V, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10371):105–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. A study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in high-risk HER2-positive participants with residual invasive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (DESTINY-Breast05). Available at: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04622319.

  25. A Phase 3 Open-label Trial of Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Monotherapy or T-DXd Followed by THP Compared to ddAC-THP in Participants With High-risk HER2-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast11). Avaiable at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05113251.

  26. Guarneri V, Griguolo G, Miglietta F, Conte PF, Dieci MV, Girardi F. Survival after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab-lapatinib and chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. ESMO Open. 2022;7(2): 100433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Broglio KR, Quintana M, Foster M, Olinger M, McGlothlin A, Berry SM, et al. Association of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Long-Term Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(6):751–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Davey MG, Browne F, Miller N, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ. Pathological complete response as a surrogate to improved survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2022;6(3).

Download references

Funding

This trial is funded by Breast Cancer Ireland. This research was conducted with support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) DAC. In March 2019, AstraZeneca entered into a global development and commercialization collaboration agreement with Daiichi Sankyo for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Gavin P. Dowling, Sinead Toomey, Philip Bredin, Colm Power, Patrick G. Morris, Deirdre Duke, Arnold D. K. Hill & Bryan T. Hennessy

  2. Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    Gavin P. Dowling, Philip Bredin, Colm Power, Anne Marie O’Shea, Megan Greally, Patrick G. Morris, Deirdre Duke, Arnold D. K. Hill & Bryan T. Hennessy

  3. Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

    Imelda Parker, Eibhlin Mulroe, Jacinta Marron, Olivia McLoughlin & Ausra Teiserskiene

Authors
  1. Gavin P. Dowling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sinead Toomey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip Bredin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Imelda Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eibhlin Mulroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jacinta Marron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Olivia McLoughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ausra Teiserskiene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Colm Power
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Anne Marie O’Shea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Megan Greally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Patrick G. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Deirdre Duke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Arnold D. K. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Bryan T. Hennessy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Authorship will be based on the Recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE, www.icmje.org). BTH conceived and designed the study; GPD has drafted the work; BTH and ADKH have substantively revised the manuscript; IP, EM, JM, OM, AT, have made substantial contributions to the design of the study; GPD, ADKH, PB, PGM, ST, and DD have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and have substantively revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin P. Dowling.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial protocol was approved by the National Office for Research Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials (NREC-CT), the NREC for Clinical Investigations of Medical Devices and Performance Studies of In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (NREC-MD), the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) and the HPRA Medical Devices (HPRA-MD). The trial was registered in the European drug regulatory affairs Clinical Trials database (Eudra-CT 2022–002485-32, June 30, 2022) and ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05710666). This study is being conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the guiding principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All prospective patients must provide written informed consent for participation in the study procedures. Before informed consent may be obtained, the investigator should provide the patient ample time and opportunity to inquire about details of the trial and to decide whether or not to participate in the trial. All questions about the trial should be answered to the satisfaction of the patient. Patients are well informed that participation in voluntary and that they may withdraw at any point during the study. Informed consent includes consent for collection and use of biological specimens (i.e. blood and tissue). Written informed consent of patients is required before enrolment in the trial or study related procedures take place. All data are handled with strict confidentiality, assuring anonymity of patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowling, G.P., Toomey, S., Bredin, P. et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with response-directed definitive therapy in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a phase II study protocol (SHAMROCK study). BMC Cancer 24, 91 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11851-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11851-4

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us