Skip to main content
Download PDF

CT texture analysis in predicting treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization using random forest models

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 201 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Using texture features derived from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) combined with general imaging features as well as clinical information to predict treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment.

Methods

From January 2014 to November 2022, 289 patients with HCC who underwent TACE were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical information was documented. Their treatment-naïve contrast-enhanced CTs were retrieved and reviewed by two independent radiologists. Four general imaging features were evaluated. Texture features were extracted based on the regions of interest (ROIs) drawn on the slice with the largest axial diameter of all lesions using Pyradiomics v3.0.1. After excluding features with low reproducibility and low predictive value, the remaining features were selected for further analyses. The data were randomly divided in a ratio of 8:2 for model training and testing. Random forest classifiers were built to predict patient response to TACE treatment. Random survival forest models were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS).

Results

We retrospectively evaluated 289 patients (55.4 ± 12.4 years old) with HCC treated with TACE. Twenty features, including 2 clinical features (ALT and AFP levels), 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombus) and 17 texture features, were included in model construction. The random forest classifier achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947 with an accuracy of 89.5% for predicting treatment response. The random survival forest showed good predictive performance with out-of-bag error rate of 0.347 (0.374) and a continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) of 0.170 (0.067) for the prediction of OS (PFS).

Conclusions

Random forest algorithm based on texture features combined with general imaging features and clinical information is a robust method for predicting prognosis in patients with HCC treated with TACE, which may help avoid additional examinations and assist in treatment planning.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant disease with high mortality. Many risk factors have been well established that impact the outcomes of HCC, including age, gender, staging, ascites, tumour thrombus and liver function [1]. Curative surgery will increase the long-term survival rate. However, not all HCCs can be treated with surgical resection due to the high disease burden, insufficient residual liver volume, severe cirrhosis, disseminated metastatic lesions within the liver, presence of portal vein tumour thrombus and other cancer-related symptoms [2].

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system supported transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the first treatment choice in patients with unresectable HCC, such as those with large or multinodular HCC. The same recommendation is also made in the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI) [3] and the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system [4]. The long-term survival was prolonged in patients with unresectable HCC when treated with TACE compared to the best supportive care [5]. However, in the clinical setting, the therapeutic outcome of TACE is not always satisfying when it comes to individual cases because the biological behaviour of tumour cells is highly heterogeneous.

Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (mRECIST) is a criterion relying on the change of tumour burden before and after treatment in HCC [6]. Several studies have demonstrated that the objective response assessed by mRECIST is independently prognostic for survival and can be considered a valid endpoint in HCC clinical trials [7,8,9].

Currently, the assessment mainly depends on imaging methods, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Though many image characteristics have been suggested as having prognostic value, substantial subtle features were omitted during traditional imaging assessment, which is highly dependent on individual experience and limited by human eye resolution. CT texture analysis is a post-processing algorithm that further defines tumour characteristics beyond the perception of human eyes. By conducting texture analysis, large amounts of texture features are extracted from the pre-treatment images, which can reflect tumour heterogeneity, showing both morphological and cellular diversity [10]. It has been widely applied in many cancer types to predict patient outcome [11,12,13,14].

Thus, the primary aim of this study was to create a robust model incorporating texture features derived from contrast-enhanced CT combined with general imaging features as well as clinical information to predict treatment response. Secondary analyses aimed to determine the features that predicted the overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) in patients with HCC who received TACE.

Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre Institutional Review Board (No. B2021-214–01) with a waiver of written informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. From January 2014 to November 2022, data on patients with histological diagnoses of HCC were retrieved from our centre's database. Inclusion criteria were patients (1) with contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen performed before the initiation of treatment; (2) who received TACE treatment, and (3) who had 1st follow-up CT within 4–6 weeks after TACE. Exclusion criteria included patients (1) with a single lesion with a maximal diameter of less than 1 cm or not detectable on baseline CT; (2) having disseminated disease within the liver precluding the placement of regions of interest (ROIs); (3) received other treatments before or after TACE, including surgery, radiofrequency treatment or liver transplantation; (4) with no corresponding laboratory test results, and (5) with other malignancies. Patient demographics were recorded, including age, gender, BCLC stage, Child − Pugh class, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and complications (diabetes or hypertension). Laboratory test results, including platelet (PLT) count, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), international normalized ratio (INR), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin (ALB), C-reactive protein (CRP), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were collected.

CT acquisition

CT examinations were performed using 2 scanners with intravenous contrast media. The volume of the contrast media was determined by multiplying the body weight (in kilograms) by 2 to a maximum of 100 mL. The concentration of the iodinated contrast media was 350 mg/mL with an injection rate of 2 mL/s. The scanning parameters of the 2 scanners were as follows: (1) The 128-channel CT scanner (Discovery CT750, GE Healthcare, US): field of view, 25 cm; matrix, 512 × 512; tube voltage, 120 kVp; tube current, 200–400 mA; reconstructed thickness, 5 mm; (2) The 128-channel CT scanners (Somatom Definition or Definition AS + , Siemens Healthcare, US): field of view, 35 cm; matrix, 512 × 512; tube voltage, 80–120 kVp; tube current, 248–578 mA; reconstructed thickness, 5 mm. Finally, the arterial phase images of the CT examination were anonymized and assigned a research code for the assessment of general imaging features and the extraction of texture features.

General imaging features assessment

All data were reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists on a dedicated software (ITK-SNAP, v 3.8.0). The senior radiologist (R1) had more than 10 years of cross-sectional imaging experience, while the junior radiologist (R2) had 5 years of cross-sectional imaging experience. This was designed to test for inter-observer agreement. Only the data from the senior radiologist was used for subsequent feature extraction and model construction.

To begin with, they identified all lesions for each patient in consensus and marked the slice of the largest axial diameter of each lesion. Then, they evaluated general imaging features and drew ROIs separately. Four general imaging features were assessed, including (1) largest tumour diameter, (2) number of lesions, (3) presence or absence of portal vein thrombus, and (4) presence or absence of ascites. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to select clinical features that had independent prognostic value.

ROI delineation and Texture feature extraction

ROIs were drawn by strictly delineating around the margin of the mass with careful inclusion of both solid and cystic components but exclusion of adjacent normal structures (Suppl 1). If there were multiple lesions, all would be given an ROI delineation.

Texture feature extraction was performed on an open-source Python-based radiomics software (PyRadiomics, v 2.2.0). First, all images are normalized and scaled before textual computation. Then, 5 filters were applied, including Laplacian of Gaussian, wavelet, square, square root, logarithm, and exponential filters [15]. Wavelet transformation was applied with a single-level directional discrete wavelet transform of high-pass and low-pass filters [16]. Eight wavelet-decomposition images were created, including HHH, HHL, HLH, HLL, LHH, LHL, LLH, and LLL (H: high-pass filter; L: low-pass filter). Finally, 1618 texture features were extracted, including (1) first-order statistics, (2) shape-based features, (3) gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), (4) gray-level-dependent matrix (GLDM), (5) neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), (6) gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM), and (7) gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM). More details about these features were tabulated in Table 1 [17].

Table 1 Description of texture feature groups
Full size table

Feature reduction and selection

First, all texture features were tested by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Features with low inter-rater reproducibility (ICC < 0.8) were excluded. Next, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was employed for further feature reduction. The tuning parameter (λ) was selected using 10-fold cross-validation and minimum criteria. A plot of the partial likelihood deviance was made against log (λ). The minimum (lambda.min) and 1-SE criteria (lambda.1se) were used to draw the dotted vertical lines at the optimal values. The whole analytical procedure was shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A flowchart depicting the analytical procedures. HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; LASSO = least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; OS = overall survival; PFS = progress-free survival; TACE = transarterial chemoembolization

Full size image

TACE procedures

Patients were given TACE using cytotoxic drugs as determined by a local multi-disciplinary team in accordance with the recommendations of the European/American Association for Liver Disease guidelines [18, 19].

Conventional TACE was performed through femoral access under moderate sedation using the Seldinger technique [20]. To cause embolization of the tumour microcirculation, cytotoxic drugs or chemotherapeutic agents suspended in lipiodol were administrated into the tumour-feeding artery with a dose ranging from 5 to 30 mL depending on the location, the size, and the number of lesions. If necessary, gelatin sponge particles (150–350 μm) were injected to block the blood until the flow was static.

Assessment of treatment response and follow-up

All patients had 1st follow-up CT within 4–6 weeks after TACE. Their treatment response was evaluated by mRECIST. Patients were dichotomized into the progress-free cohort, including those who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and the progress cohort, including those who exhibited progressive disease (PD) during follow-up. CR was defined as no intratumorally arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. SD was defined as neither PR nor PD. PD was defined as an over 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of viable arterial-enhancing target lesions or new nodule formation.

All patients were followed up by telephone or clinical visits once every 2 months during the first year and once every 3 months after that until death or the last follow-up day (30th November 2022). OS was defined as the time from baseline CT to death or censoring date. PFS was defined as the time from TACE to disease progression based on mRECIST, death, or censoring date.

Statistics

Data were described as mean and standard deviation or median and range tested by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Fisher’s exact test and Welch’s T-test were used to verify differences among features. The Dice coefficient was calculated between the ROIs drawn by the two radiologists. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to select clinical and general imaging features. ICC and LASSO regression was used to select texture features.

The data were randomly divided in a ratio of 8:2 for model training and testing. To test the added value of texture features to the predictive model, two random forest classifiers (Model 1 including selected clinical information, general imaging features and texture features; Model 2 including selected clinical information and general imaging features) were created to differentiate the progress-free cohort from the progress cohort. Random survival forest models (Model 1 including selected clinical information, general imaging features and texture features; Model 2 including clinical information and general imaging features) were used to evaluate OS and PFS in patients with HCC treated with TACE. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The "randomForest” and “randomForestSRC” packages were implemented. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics

A total of 289 patients with HCC who received TACE treatment were retrospectively included in this study, with an average age of 55.4 ± 12.4 years. Most of them (N = 261, 90.3%) were male. The median time interval from baseline CT examination to TACE treatment was 4.5 days (range: 1–14 days) and from TACE treatment to 1st follow-up CT examination was 35 days (range: 28–42 days). Patients were randomly allocated into training and testing sets in the ratio of 8:2 for analytical purposes. Detailed patient characteristics were reported in Table 2.

Table 2 Patient demographics
Full size table

Clinical and general imaging features selection

All clinical features (age, gender, ECOG performance status, Complications, Hepatitis, ALB, ALT, AST, TBIL, PT, INR, PLT, Child–Pugh class, CRP, BCLC stage, AFP) and general imaging features (diameter of the largest lesion, number of lesions, presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis, and presence or absence of ascites) were included in univariate logistic analysis. Detailed results of the assessment of general imaging features were tabulated in Suppl 2. Those significant features were included in multivariate logistic analysis (Table 3). Finally, 2 clinical features (ALT, AFP levels) and 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombus) were selected for further model construction.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of clinical features and general imaging features in the classification of short-term treatment response
Full size table

Texture features reduction and selection

The mean Dice similarity coefficient of the ROIs between two radiologists was 0.90 ± 0.08. A total of 1618 texture features were extracted for each patient. First, the features with low inter-rater reproducibility (ICC < 0.8) were excluded, thus reducing the number of texture features to 1480. Next, the LASSO algorithm was conducted to select features that had prognostic value. The minimum (lambda.min) and 1-SE criteria (lambda.1se) were 0.019 and 0.070, respectively (Suppl 3). Finally, 17 texture features were included in further model construction.

Treatment response

During the follow-up, a small proportion of patients (22.5%) achieved progressive outcomes (PD N = 65), while the rest (77.5%) had progress-free disease (CR N = 1, PR N = 139 and SD N = 84). The patients were dichotomized into progress-free and progress cohorts for analytic purposes.

There was no significant difference between training and testing sets for all selected features (p > 0.05). Our random forest Model 1 based on the selected 2 clinical features (AFP and ALT levels), 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombus) and 17 texture features resulted in an AUC of 0.947 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.889–1.000 for predicting treatment response after TACE. The accuracy was 89.5% (95% CI: 78.5%-96.0%). The top 3 features for predicting mRECIST were AFP level, texture features wavelet.LHL_ngtdm_Contrast, and wavelet.LLL_firstorder_RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation. Further model performance was tabulated in Table 4 and Suppl 4. The Gini importance was plotted in Fig. 2.

Table 4 Performance of random forest classifier of Model 1 incorporating selected clinical and general imaging features with texture features and Model 2 incorporating selected clinical and general imaging features without texture features (p < 0.001)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The Gini importance of random forest classifier based on selected features for the assessment of treatment response. AFP = alpha-fetoprotein; ALT = alanine transaminase

Full size image

Another random forest Model 2 based on the selected 2 clinical features (ALT and AFP levels) and 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis) resulted in an AUC of 0.867 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.765–0.968 for predicting treatment response after TACE. The accuracy was 73.7% (95% CI: 60.3%-84.5%), significantly inferior to Model 1 (p < 0.001).

Survival analysis

The median follow-up period was 38 months. On the last follow-up day, 121 alive patients were documented as censored for the OS analysis. Sixty-five patients without progressive disease were documented as censored for PFS analysis. The median OS and PFS and were 281 (range: 47–2578) days and 54 (range: 5–1074) days, respectively.

The selected 20 features were included in the random survival forest to predict OS in patients with HCC treated with TACE. In Model 1, the random forest algorithm, including 2 clinical features (AFP and ALT levels), 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombus) and 17 texture features achieved OOB Error Rate of 0.347 to predict OS. The continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) was 0.170. The presence or absence of portal vein thrombus, AFP level and texture feature wavelet.LHL_ngtdm_Contrast were the top 3 features of importance (Fig. 3). In addition, the plot of the time-dependent OOB Brier score and CRPS demonstrated that the random survival forest model for the prediction of OS performed particularly well in the first year, especially for the low-risk quartile sample set (0–25% line) and continued to perform well afterwards (Fig. 4). In Model 2, the random forest algorithm 2, including clinical features (AFP and ALT levels) and 1 general imaging feature (presence or absence of portal vein thrombus) achieved OOB Error Rate of 0.576. The CRPS was 0.282, which is inferior to Model 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Importance list of 20 features in the random survival forest predicting OS. The abscissa depicts the variable importance. Relative importance is calculated by dividing each variable importance score by the largest importance score of the variables. AFP = alpha-fetoprotein; ALT = alanine transaminase; OS = overall survival

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Performance of random survival forest predicting OS over time (days). A Forest estimated survival function. The black line indicates each individual; the thick red line indicates overall ensemble survival and the thick green line indicates the Nelson-Aalen estimator. B Brier score stratified by ensemble mortality. Red line is the overall (non-stratified) Brier score. This score ranges from 0–1 (0 = perfect, 1 = poor); C The CRPS was calculated as Brier score divided by time; D Plots of mortality of each individual versus observed time. Points in blue correspond to death events, black points are censored observations. CRPS = continuous ranked probability score; OS = overall survival

Full size image

In Model 1, the random survival forest algorithm achieved OOB Error Rate of 0.374 to predict PFS. The CRPS was 0.067. AFP level, ALT level and presence or absence of portal vein thrombus were the top 3 features of importance (Fig. 5). In addition, the plot of the time-dependent OOB Brier score and CRPS demonstrated that the random survival forest model for the prediction of PFS performed the worst for the low-risk quartile sample set (0–25% line) and had better performance over long term compared to the first 200 days (Fig. 6). In Model 2, the random forest algorithm achieved OOB Error Rate of 0.529. The CRPS was 0.193, which is inferior to Model 1.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Importance list of 20 features in the random survival forest predicting PFS. The abscissa depicts the variable importance. Relative importance is calculated by dividing each variable importance score by the largest importance score of the variables. AFP = alpha-fetoprotein; ALT = alanine transaminase; PFS = progress-free survival

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Performance of random survival forest predicting PFS over time (days). A Forest estimated survival function. The black line indicates each individual; the thick red line indicates progress-free ensemble survival and the thick green line indicates the Nelson-Aalen estimator. B Brier score stratified by ensemble mortality. Red line is the progress-free (non-stratified) Brier score. This score ranges from 0–1 (0 = perfect, 1 = poor); C The CRPS was calculated as Brier score divided by time; D Plots of mortality of each individual versus observed time. Points in blue correspond to disease progression, black points are censored observations. CRPS = continuous ranked probability score; PFS = progress-free survival

Full size image

Discussion

Our study constructed a random forest classifier that incorporated CT texture features, general imaging features and clinical information in predicting treatment response in HCC after TACE. This model achieved good performance, offering an objective and non-invasive method for evaluating TACE treatment, potentially avoiding extra imaging examinations or diagnostic work-up and facilitating personalized treatment.

It has been well established that high tumour burden, impaired liver function, incomplete necrosis, the occurrence of extrahepatic spread and vascular invasion should reduce the therapeutic effectiveness of TACE [21]. The AFP level was reported as one of the most significant prognostic factors to predict treatment outcome, and the changes in AFP after treatment highly correlated with radiologic response and survival [22, 23]. Similar conclusions have been drawn from our study, in which AFP level showed high importance for predicting mRECIST, OS and PFS. Elevated ALT level indicates the impairment of liver function and is a critical point when assessing TACE feasibility. Interestingly, ALT showed high importance in the prediction of PFS in our study. This phenomenon could be preserved liver function will help form sufficient tumour necrosis after TACE which prevented tumour invasion and progression. The presence of portal vein thrombus has been well established as a negative predictor for survival [24]. We observed that the presence of thrombus had high importance in OS and PFS random survival forest models, in contrast, for the prediction of mRECIST, the presence of portal vein thrombus was the least important variable. This could be due to the fact that following TACE, immediate treatment response was rapidly assessed, while the presence of portal vein thrombus may have a long-term adverse effect on prognosis.

A series of studies have been published using texture analysis or radiomic techniques to predict the response of TACE in HCC across different modalities, such as non-contrast CT [25], contrast CT [26], and MRI [27], with good performance (AUC ranging from 0.884–0.960). Tumour heterogeneity and size were identified as critical prognostic features in the Nested multiparametric decision tree [28]. The histogram-based features and shape features were reported to be sensitive in determining the nature of the tumour, which is related to tumoral heterogeneity [29, 30]. Our study achieved a similar or higher AUC compared to the above-mentioned studies and several texture features showed high importance in our classifier, especially for the 3-dimension grey level in a matrix classified by region volume, the GLSZM. These features indirectly express a higher degree of tissue homogeneity, which may be interpreted as a consequence of the TACE treatment response, thus reducing the contrast between neighbouring voxels in the non-tumoral component. The CT textural analysis markedly added to the information generated by the clinical parameters in the model for the prediction of immediate treatment response after TACE.

Our random survival forest Model 1 incorporating texture features showed lower CRPS and OOB Error Rate compared to Model 2 based on clinical information and general imaging features. Thus, CT texture features had added value in predicting survival in patients with HCC treated with TACE. Prior studies have proven the value of several features in predicting survival in HCC, including AFP level, ALT level, and presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis [31,32,33,34], similarly those features showed high importance in our random survival forest models. There are two main differences between our study and the prior studies. First, our study extracted several texture features to characterize tumour nature and demonstrated high importance. Second, prior studies constructed models based on radiomics or clinical scores that might have dependencies. Their combination without considering the potential correlation among these dependencies might lead to overfitting the data, in contrast, the random forest algorithms in our study can prevent overfitting by simply reducing tree depth.

There were limitations in our study. First, only arterial phase images were analysed in our study as previous studies have proven that the extracellular volume and blood flow in HCC during the arterial phase could give rise to unique radiological features [35,36,37]. Second, selection bias could have resulted from the fact that the patients were recruited from a single specialized oncology medical centre, and that by the time they sought treatment here, their disease may have already been advanced. Finally, the results from this study were based on texture features extracted using one software. They may not be applicable when using other platforms with different analysis algorithms or higher-order statistics. Standardization and data reproducibility are important before CT texture analysis can be widely applied in clinics.

Conclusions

The current study showed that using random forest algorithms based on the combination of clinical information, general imaging features and texture features derived from pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT could predict treatment response and survival in HCC treated with TACE. Our findings potentially help patients with HCC avoid additional examinations and assist in treatment planning.

Availability of data and materials

The anonymized original data is available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

ALB:

Albumin

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

AUC:

Area under the curve

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

CUPI:

Chinese University Prognostic Index

CR:

Complete response

CT:

Computed tomography

CI:

Confidence interval

CRPS:

Continuous ranked probability score

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

GLCM:

Gray-level co-occurrence matrix

GLRLM:

Gray-level run length matrix

GLSZM:

Gray-level size zone matrix

GLDM:

Gray-level-dependent matrix

HR:

Hazard ratio

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HKLC:

Hong Kong Liver Cancer

INR:

International normalized ratio

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

mRECIST:

Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors

NGTDM:

Neighboring gray tone difference matrix

OS:

Overall survival

PR:

Partial response

PLT:

Platelet

PD:

Progressive disease

PFS:

Progress-free survival

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic curve

ROIs:

Regions of interest

SD:

Stable disease

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

References

  1. Wu K-T, Wang C-C, Lu L-G, Zhang W-D, Zhang F-J, Shi F, Li C-X. Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical study of long-term survival and choice of treatment modalities. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(23):3649–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Václav T. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Klin Onkol. 2020;2020(Supplementum 3):30–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chan SL, Mo FK, Johnson PJ, Liem GS, Chan TC, Poon MC, Ma BB, Leung TW, Lai PB, Chan AT, et al. Prospective validation of the Chinese University Prognostic Index and comparison with other staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma in an Asian population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(2):340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yau T, Tang VY, Yao TJ, Fan ST, Lo CM, Poon RT. Development of Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system with treatment stratification for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(7):1691-1700.e1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong J-Y, Li S-M, Fan H-Y, Zhang L, Zhao H-J, Li S-M. Transarterial chemoembolization extends long-term survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine. 2018;97(33):e11872–e11872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Lencioni R. mRECIST for HCC: Performance and novel refinements. J Hepatol. 2020;72(2):288–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lencioni R, Montal R, Torres F, Park JW, Decaens T, Raoul JL, Kudo M, Chang C, Ríos J, Boige V, et al. Objective response by mRECIST as a predictor and potential surrogate end-point of overall survival in advanced HCC. J Hepatol. 2017;66(6):1166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillmore R, Stuart S, Kirkwood A, Hameeduddin A, Woodward N, Burroughs AK, Meyer T. EASL and mRECIST responses are independent prognostic factors for survival in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with transarterial embolization. J Hepatol. 2011;55(6):1309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer T, Palmer DH, Cheng AL, Hocke J, Loembé AB, Yen CJ. mRECIST to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two randomised phase II trials comparing nintedanib vs sorafenib. Liver Int. 2017;37(7):1047–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meier A, Veeraraghavan H, Nougaret S, Lakhman Y, Sosa R, Soslow RA, Sutton EJ, Hricak H, Sala E, Vargas HA. Association between CT-texture-derived tumor heterogeneity, outcomes, and BRCA mutation status in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Abdominal radiology (New York). 2019;44(6):2040–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altazi BA, Fernandez DC, Zhang GG, Hawkins S, Naqvi SM, Kim Y, Hunt D, Latifi K, Biagioli M, Venkat P, et al. Investigating multi-radiomic models for enhancing prediction power of cervical cancer treatment outcomes. Phys Med. 2018;46:180–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu Y, Tan Y, Xie C, Hu Q, Ouyang J, Chen Y, Gu Y, Li A, Lu N, He Z, et al. Development and Validation of a Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Signature to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12): e2028086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z, Liang C, Tian J, Liang C. Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage (I or II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology. 2016;281(3):947–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sah BR, Owczarczyk K, Siddique M, Cook GJR, Goh V. Radiomics in esophageal and gastric cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(6):2048–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, Bussink J, Monshouwer R, Haibe-Kains B, Rietveld D, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang JZ. Wavelets and imaging informatics: a review of the literature. J Biomed Inform. 2001;34(2):129–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts H. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e104–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42(5):1208–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo J, Guo RP, Lai EC, Zhang YJ, Lau WY, Chen MS, Shi M. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(2):413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller L, Stoehr F, Mähringer-Kunz A, Hahn F, Weinmann A, Kloeckner R. Current Strategies to Identify Patients That Will Benefit from TACE Treatment and Future Directions a Practical Step-by-Step Guide. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:403–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim BK, Ahn SH, Seong JS, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JK, Lee DY, Lee KH, Han KH. Early α-fetoprotein response as a predictor for clinical outcome after localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2011;31(3):369–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan SL, Mo FK, Johnson PJ, Hui EP, Ma BB, Ho WM, Lam KC, Chan AT, Mok TS, Yeo W. New utility of an old marker: serial alpha-fetoprotein measurement in predicting radiologic response and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(3):446–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng XC, Chen BH, Huang JJ, Huang WS, Cai MY, Zhou JW, Guo YJ, Zhu KS. Early prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(4):484–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo Z, Zhong N, Xu X, Zhang Y, Luo X, Zhu H, Zhang X, Wu D, Qiu Y, Tu F. Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: A Real-World Study Based on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography Radiomics and General Image Features. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:773–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng J, Kang S, Ning Z, Deng H, Shen J, Xu Y, Zhang J, Zhao W, Li X, Gong W, et al. Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(1):413–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kong C, Zhao Z, Chen W, Lv X, Shu G, Ye M, Song J, Ying X, Weng Q, Weng W, et al. Prediction of tumor response via a pretreatment MRI radiomics-based nomogram in HCC treated with TACE. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(10):7500–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Vosshenrich J, Zech CJ, Heye T, Boldanova T, Fucile G, Wieland S, Heim MH, Boll DT. Response prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: unlocking the potential of CT texture analysis through nested decision tree models. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(6):4367–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Just N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(12):2205–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Shu Z, Ye Q, Chen J, Zhong J, Jiang H, Wu C, Yu T, Pang P, Ma T, et al. Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Multi-Parametric MRI Radiomics. Front Oncol. 2021;11:633596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Haubold J, Reinboldt MP, Wetter A, Li Y, Ludwig JM, Lange C, Wedemeyer H, Schotten C, Umutlu L, Theysohn J. DSM-TACE of HCC: Evaluation of Tumor Response in Patients Ineligible for Other Systemic or Loco-Regional Therapies. Rofo. 2020;192(9):862–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mulé S, Thiefin G, Costentin C, Durot C, Rahmouni A, Luciani A, Hoeffel C. Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pretreatment Contrast-enhanced CT Texture Parameters as Predictive Biomarkers of Survival in Patients Treated with Sorafenib. Radiology. 2018;288(2):445–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tandon P, Garcia-Tsao G. Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies. Liver Int. 2009;29(4):502–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Shanbhogue AK, Prasad SR, Takahashi N, Vikram R, Sahani DV. Recent advances in cytogenetics and molecular biology of adult hepatocellular tumors: implications for imaging and management. Radiology. 2011;258(3):673–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chou R, Cuevas C, Fu R, Devine B, Wasson N, Ginsburg A, Zakher B, Pappas M, Graham E, Sullivan SD. Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):697–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects. Radiology. 2014;272(3):635–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stevens WR, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Batts KP. CT findings in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of tumor characteristics with causative factors, tumor size, and histologic tumor grade. Radiology. 1994;191(2):531–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Diagnostic Imaging Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

    He An

  2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China

    Inderjeet Bhatia

  3. Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

    Fei Cao & Zilin Huang

  4. Diagnostic Imaging Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China

    Chuanmiao Xie

Authors
  1. He An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inderjeet Bhatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fei Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zilin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chuanmiao Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: HA, Methodology: HA, IB, FC, Software: HA, Validation: HA, Formal analysis: HA, Investigation: HA, Resources: HA, CX, ZH, Data Curation: HA, IB, Writing—Original Draft: HA, Writing—Review & Editing: All authors, Visualization: HA, Supervision: CX, Project administration: CX, Funding acquisition: N.A. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanmiao Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Sun Yat-sen Cancer Centre Institutional Review Board (No. B2021-214–01) with a waiver of written informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Suppl 1. Contrast-enhanced CT in a 65-year-old male with HCC. The red mask is the demonstration of ROIs placement on the axial phase image. Suppl 2. Summary of general imaging features. Suppl 3. Feature selection using the LASSO algorithm. (A) Selection of the tuning parameter (λ) using 10-fold cross-validation and the minimum criteria. A plot of the partial likelihood deviance was made against log (λ). The minimum and 1-SE criteria were used to draw the dotted vertical lines at the optimal values. (B) Profiles of the LASSO coefficients for the texture features. The vertical line was drawn at a value selected from the log (λ) sequence using 10-fold cross-validation. Seventeen texture features were selected within this range. Suppl 4. ROC curves of Model 1 (A) incorporating selected clinical information, general imaging features and texture features and Model 2 (B) without texture features for the prediction of treatment response.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, H., Bhatia, I., Cao, F. et al. CT texture analysis in predicting treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization using random forest models. BMC Cancer 23, 201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10620-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10620-z

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us