Skip to main content
Download PDF

Enhancement of radiation therapy by indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 inhibition through multimodal mechanisms

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 62 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an enzyme that converts tryptophan to kynurenine. IDO1 expression is found not only in tumor cells but also in immune cells and is associated with tumor proliferation and immune responses. IDO1 inhibitors and radiation may cooperatively suppress tumor proliferation through the alterations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, cell cycle, and immune response. We investigated the antitumor effects of combination therapy of an IDO1 inhibitor, 1-methyl tryptophan (1-MT), and radiation on colorectal cancer.

Methods

In vitro experiments were conducted using human and murine colon cancer cell lines (HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26). Cell growth inhibition was assessed using a MTS assay and Clonogenic assay. Cells were cultured for 48 h with or without 500 µM 1-MT after exposure to radiation (4 Gy). Cell cycle effects and modulation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway were evaluated using western blot analysis, flow cytometry, RT-PCR. Subcutaneous Colon26 tumors in BALB/c mice were treated by oral 1-MT (6 mg/mL) for 2 weeks and/or local radiation (10 Gy/10 fr). Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in tumor cells and expression of differentiation markers of immune cells were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

Results

1-MT and a small interfering RNA against IDO1 suppressed proliferation of all cell lines, which was rescued by kynurenine. Clonogenic assay showed that administration of 1-MT improved radiosensitivity by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway activated by radiation and enhancing cell cycle arrest induced by radiation. Combination therapy showed a further reduction in tumor burden compared with monotherapies or untreated control, inducing the highest numbers of intratumoral CD3 + and CD8 + T cells and the lowest numbers of Foxp3 + and BrdU-positive tumor cells.

Conclusions

The combination of 1-MT and radiation suppressed colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo via multiple mechanisms.

Peer Review reports

Background

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is widely used as a standard therapy for patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer [1]. Preoperative CRT can decrease the frequency of local recurrence and improve sphincter preservation rates with reduced side effects than postoperative CRT [2,3,4,5]. Prognosis of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR), defined as no remaining tumor at pathological examination, is known to be excellent [6]. However, only 10–20% of patients can achieve a pCR by conventional fluoropyrimidine‑based CRT [7, 8], and there is no evidence that CRT leads to improved overall survival [9]. Hence, novel therapeutic regimens for improving radiosensitivity of tumor are being investigated worldwide. Several trials on the effect of adding oxaliplatin to conventional fluoropyrimidines‑based CRT have been reported, although their conclusions regarding prognoses were inconsistent [10,11,12,13,14]. Our group reported that the pCR rate increased to 22.7% by adding irinotecan (80 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 1 cycle) to conventional CRT [15]. In contrast, the ARISTOTLE trial reported that the addition of irinotecan (60 mg/m2 every week for 1 cycle) did not significantly improve the pCR rate [16]. Therefore, the benefit of adding irinotecan to CRT has not been fully proven.

Enhancing response to radiation therapy is multimodal and associated with numerous biological and genetic alterations [17]. First, radiation induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase [17, 18]. Second, tumor cell death caused by radiation results in the release of cellular components which recruits dendric cells and activates effector T cells [19]. In contrast, repeated irradiation was shown to result in the enhancement of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, increasing radioresistance in human colorectal cancer cell lines [20]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway upregulated by radiation may improve the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy.

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an enzyme that converts tryptophan to kynurenine [21]. IDO1 is induced by inflammatory cytokines such as interferon γ (IFN γ) and TNF α [21]. In tumor cells, kynurenine accentuates the cell cycle, and IDO1 inhibition significantly reduces the number of cells in S phase [22]. IDO1 expression in dendritic cells was shown to decrease local tryptophan concentrations and inhibit T cell proliferation [23]. In effector T cells, tryptophan metabolism activates the general control non-depressive 2 kinase (GCN2) and causes T cell arrest at G1 phase [24]. On the other hand, kynurenine activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and converts naïve CD4 + T cells to regulatory T cells [25]. These regulatory T cells in turn induce more IDO1-positive dendritic cells through the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) through a positive feedback mechanism [26]. Moreover, in an in vitro experiment, IDO1 was shown to upregulate cell proliferation by promoting the accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus and activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [22]. In a clinical study, IDO1 was expressed in some patients with melanoma, lung, breast, esophagus, stomach, or colorectal cancers [27]. The expression of IDO1 in colorectal cancer as well as other malignancies is associated with poor prognosis [28, 29].

Based on the above-mentioned findings, we hypothesized that IDO1 inhibition and radiation could work cooperatively to induce cell cycle arrest and accentuate the antitumor immune response. Moreover, we anticipated that IDO1 inhibition may reverse upregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway caused by radiation. In the current study, we conducted in vitro and in vivo experiments to investigate the antitumor effects of combining an IDO1 inhibitor with radiation for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Cell culture and reagents

Human colorectal cancer cell lines HCT116 and HT-29 and murine colorectal cancer cell line Colon26 were obtained from the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank. All cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) with 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlas Biologicals, Fort Collins, CO) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37℃. IDO1 inhibitor, 1-methyl tryptophan (1-MT; Sigma Aldrich), was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for the in vitro experiments. For the in vivo experiments, 1-MT was dissolved in 10 mmol/L NaOH in drinking water at a concentration of 6 mg/mL, and supplemented with Stevia sweetener (0.1%) to improve acceptance by mice.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA)

Stealth RNAi Pre-Designed siRNA targeting IDO1 was synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The siRNA sequence was 5’-UUUGCAUUGCCUUGAAUACAGUAGG -3’. HCT116 and HT-29 cells were transfected with 10 nmol/L siRNA or control siRNA (siRNA Negative Control Med GC Duplex #2, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a 0.6% RNAiMAX reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cell proliferation assay

HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well and incubated for 48 h or 96 h with or without 1-MT (100, 500, or 1000 µM). All cells were also treated with 1-MT (500 µM) with or without the administration of kynurenine (50, 100, or 200 µM). In addition, HCT116 and HT-29 cells were incubated for 48 h with siRNA with or without the administration of kynurenine (100 µM). Then, cells were incubated with MTS reagent (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) for 3 h, and absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a plate reader (InterMed, Tokyo, Japan). The values are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD).

Drug treatment and exposure to radiation

Cells were treated with 1-MT (500 µM) 1 h prior to radiation therapy (RT). Irradiation was performed sing an X-ray generator (Pantac HF350; Kyoto, Japan) at doses of 0, 2, 4, and 6 Gy (1.0 Gy/min).

To evaluate the effects of 1-MT and/or radiation on Wnt/β-catenin pathway and cell cycle, cells were cultured for 48 h with or without 500 µM 1-MT after exposure to radiation (4 Gy). To assess the effect of IFNs on IDO1 expression, cells were cultured for 48 h after 1–100 ng/ml of IFN α (R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN), 1–100 ng/ml of IFN β (Thermo Fisher Scientific), or 0.1–10 ng/ml of IFN γ (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were cultured for 48 h after exposure to radiation (4 Gy) in order to assess the effect of radiation on IFN expression.

Clonogenic assay

Two hundred–one thousand two hundred cells were seeded per well in a 6-well plate. Cells were treated with or without 1-MT (500 µM) 1 h prior to irradiation (0, 2, 4, or 6 Gy). After incubation for 14 days, cells were fixed with 70% ethanol and visualized with 0.5% crystal violet solution. The number of colonies was counted, and the following formula was used to calculate survival fraction (SF): SF = number of colonies with radiation/number of colonies without radiation. For each experiment, colonies were counted from three different wells. All values are expressed as means ± SD.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed according to the following protocol [30]. Whole-cell lysate was extracted in Bolt LDS sample buffer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and cOmplete ULTRA Tablets, Mini, EASYpack Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Proteins were quantified using the Qubit protein assay kit (Life Technologies). Equal amounts of proteins (40 μg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate‑polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 4–12% Bis‑Tris gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using the iBlot 2 system (Life Technologies). The membrane was trimmed for only loaded lanes. After blocking in 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. The membrane was then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Cytiva, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 1 h at room temperature. The immunoreactive bands were detected using ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (Cytiva) and Luminograph I (Atto Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

The primary antibodies used for western blot analysis were anti-IDO1 (mIDO-48, 1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-cyclin B1 (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-β-actin (1:1000 dilution; Medical and Biological Laboratories, Beverly, MA).

Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

RT-PCR was performed according to the following protocol and data was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method [31]. Total RNA was isolated from cell using the ReliaPrep RNA Miniprep Systems (Promega Corporation), and spectrophotometry was used to measure mRNA concentrations. Synthesis of cDNA was performed using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The PCR products were amplified based on the SYBR Green method using a StepOne Real Time PCR System (48-well format; Applied Biosystems).

The sequences of the forward and reverse primers are listed in S.Table 1. The following reaction protocols were applied: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95℃ for 15 s, 56–60℃ for 30 s, and 72℃ for 45 s. The cycle threshold (CT) required for the fluorescence was determined for each sample as the average value from three independent reactions. The result for each gene was reported as fold change after normalization against GAPDH, as quantified using the following formula.

$$\Delta CT (sample) = CT (target gene) - CT (GAPDH)$$
$$\Delta\Delta CT = \Delta CT (target sample) - \Delta CT (control sample)$$
$$Fold change = 2 - \Delta\Delta CT$$

Immunofluorescence microscopy

After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, cells were permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h, and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer. Cells were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibodies. Nuclear staining was performed using 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) with VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Stained cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (BZ-8100; Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The primary antibody used for immunofluorescence was anti-IDO1 (mIDO-48, 1:500 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Cell cycle analysis

After labeling with 1 mM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) solution for 1 h, cells were fixed with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Buffer (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and permeabilized with BD Cytoperm Plus Buffer (BD Pharmingen) on ice. Subsequently, cells were incubated with DNase for 1 h. Finally, BrdU and total DNA were stained with a 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) solution and a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-BrdU antibody in a shaded area. The percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2/M phase of the cell cycle was measured by flow cytometry. All values are expressed as means ± SD.

Animal experiments

A total of 60 female BALB/c mice (4 weeks old) were purchased from Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and bred under a constant temperature (20–24 °C) and humidity (45–65%) and a 12-h light–dark cycle with free access to food and water. Colon26 cells (5 × 105 cells) were dissolved in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium and injected subcutaneously in the right flank of the mice. After two weeks, when their tumors grew to 100–200 mm3 in size, mice were divided into four treatment groups (each group: 15 mice) as follows: vehicle control, 1-MT alone (6 mg/mL in drinking water), radiation alone (10 Gy/10 fr), and combined therapy (1-MT + RT). Mice in cages received the same treatments. Radiation was delivered five times weekly with a daily fraction of 1 Gy for 2 weeks (on days 1 to 5 and days 8 to 12) after shielding the whole body with lead except for the tumor. Data of all mice were not blinded and subjected to the following analyses.

The longest and shortest diameters of the implanted tumors were measured three days a week, and the tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: 0.5 × (shortest diameter)2 × (longest diameter) [32]. The body weights of the mice were also measured.

After treatment, mice were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of thiopental sodium (50 mg/kg) and rapid cervical dislocation. Death was verified by monitoring breathing, heartbeat, flexor reflex and corneal contact response. The subcutaneous tumors, liver, lung, heart, kidney, and spleen were resected and stored as paraffin-embedded sections for immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemistry of in vivo tumors

Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed Sects. 5 μm in thickness were deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated in ethanol. The sections were immersed in citrate buffer and autoclaved at 121 °C for 10 min for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, and the sections were incubated with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After overnight incubation with the primary antibody at 4 °C, the sections were anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature for 20 min. The enzymatic reaction of horseradish peroxidase labeled with secondary antibody was detected by the substrate 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan). Counterstain was performed using hematoxylin. The primary antibodies used were anti-CD8 (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD3 (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Foxp3 (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD68 (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Ly6G (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-CD31 (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

The numbers of stained immune and vascular endothelial cells were counted in two fields from five tumors for each treatment group under 400 × magnification, and the number of vascular endothelial cells in a field was defined as the microvessel density (MVD).

Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay of in vivo tumors

BrdU (50 mg/g of body weight) were injected intraperitoneally to mice 1 h before sacrifice. Dissected tumors were subjected to immunohistochemical staining. The primary antibody used was a rat anti-BrdU antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and the reaction was visualized using DAB. The number of cells positive for BrdU was counted on images captured under 400 × magnification in three fields from five tumors for each treatment group.

Biochemical analysis

After the final day of treatment, blood was collected from three mice in each treatment group. After euthanasia, blood was obtained by puncture axillary artery and vein. The blood volume collected from each mouse was 500 μl. Death was verified as described above. The numbers of white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), and platelet (Plt) and hemoglobin (Hb) were measured using an automatic blood cell counter (Celltac alpha; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and creatinine (Cre) were measured using BiOLiS 24i (Tokyo Boeki Medisys Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Coagulated samples were excluded from the a Line 7nalysis.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed repeatedly at least three times. The statistical significance of differences was evaluated by the unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test. All analyses were performed using the JMP Pro 16.2 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC), with p < 0.05 considered significant. Bonferroni correction was used during multiple comparison testing, and p < 0.0083 was considered significant.

Results

IDO1 inhibition suppressed proliferation of the colorectal cancer cell lines

IDO1 was expressed in the cytoplasm of HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells as revealed by immunofluorescence (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

IDO1 expression in colorectal cancer cell lines. IDO1 was stained by green fluorescence, and the nuclei were visualized blue with DAPI. Bars, 20 µm

Full size image

The effect of IDO1 inhibition on the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells was investigated using MTS assay. siRNAs against the IDO1 gene decreased mRNA expression by 90% compared with untreated cells or control siRNA in HCT116 and HT-29 cells (p < 0.001, S.Fig. 1). The expression of IDO1 protein was also decreased by siRNAs against the IDO1 gene (p < 0.001, S.Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 2a and b, gene silencing of IDO1 significantly inhibited cell growth in HCT116 and HT-29 cells (p < 0.001), while kynurenine completely rescued the proliferation of these knocked-down cells to the untreated levels. Similarly, 1-MT treatment for 48 h and 96 h decreased proliferation of HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.001, Fig. 2c, e, f, and S.Fig. 2), and kynurenine rescued the proliferation of HCT116 cells treated with 1-MT to the untreated levels (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of IDO1 inhibition on the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Inhibition by gene silencing of IDO1 in HCT116 (a) and HT-29 cells (b). Inhibition by 1-methyl tryptophan (1-MT) in HCT116 cells (c,d), HT-29 (e) and Colon26 (f). Results after 48-h treatment are shown as absorbances measured at 490 nm by the MTS assay. Concentration of siRNA,10 nM; concentration of kynurenine (Kyn), 100 µM. Bars indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.001

Full size image

1-MT increased radiosensitivity in the colorectal cancer cell lines

To evaluate whether IDO1 inhibition increases radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cells, surviving cells treated by radiation with or without 1-MT were counted by clonogenic assay. Radiation alone reduced the SF of HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05), while 1-MT significantly enhanced the radiosensitivity of all cells at 4 and 6 Gy (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Clonogenic assay of colorectal cancer cells after exposure to various doses of radiation with or without 1-MT. HCT116 (upper left panel), HT-29 (upper right panel), and Colon26 (lower left panel). Bars indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.05 in comparison between cells treated with and without 1-MT (500 µM)

Full size image

Wnt/β-catenin pathway modulation by 1-MT and radiation

To elucidate the changes in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway induced by 1-MT and radiation, we measured mRNA expression of Axin2, a downstream target of the pathway. In response to radiation, mRNA expression increased by 50–100% in all three cell lines, indicating that radiation activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (p < 0.0083, Fig. 4). In contrast, the expression levels of Axin2 decreased after treatment with 1-MT, and, moreover, the elevated Axin2 mRNA expression following radiation treatment was reduced to the untreated levels after administration of 1-MT.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Axin2 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer cells treated by 1-MT and/or radiation by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. HCT116 (upper left panel), HT-29 (upper right panel), and Colon26 (lower left panel). RT: radiation. Results 48 h after administration of 1-MT (500 µM) and/or radiation (4 Gy) are shown. Bars indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.0083

Full size image

Inhibition of the colorectal cancer cell cycle by 1-MT and radiation

To determine whether the inhibitory effect of 1-MT and radiation on cell proliferation is related to the cell cycle arrest, we performed cell cycle analysis on 1-MT-treated and irradiated cells. As shown in Fig. 5, 1-MT treatment of HCT116 and Colon26 cells resulted in cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase (HCT116; p = 0.007, Colon26; p = 0.005), radiation treatment of HCT116 and Colon26 cells also resulted in cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase (HCT116; p < 0.001, Colon26; p < 0.001), whereas cell cycle arrest was not observed in HT-29 cells. Furthermore, combination therapy enhanced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and decreased the population of cells in S phase (p < 0.001). The fraction of cells in G1 phase was essentially unchanged across the cell lines.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cell cycle analysis of colorectal cancer cells treated by 1-MT and/or radiation by flow cytometry. HCT116 (upper left panel), HT-29 (upper right panel), and Colon26 (lower left panel). RT: radiation. Results 48 h after administration of 1-MT (500 µM) and/or radiation (4 Gy) are shown. Bars indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.0083

Full size image

To examine the molecular mechanism of cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase by 1-MT and radiation, we analyzed cyclin B1 protein expression. HCT116 and Colon26 cells treated with a combination of 1-MT and radiation showed a marked reduction in cyclin B1 expression compared to untreated cells or those treated with 1-MT or radiation alone (S.Fig. 3). In contrast, these changes were not observed in HT29 cells.

Interaction between radiation exposure and IFN that induce IDO1

As shown in S.Fig. 4, IFN γ increased the mRNA expression of IDO1 in a dose-dependent manner in HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells (p < 0.001). In contrast, IFN α and IFN β had no effect on the mRNA expression of IDO1.

In response to radiation, both IFN α and IFN β mRNA increased in HCT116, HT-29, and Colon26 cells (p < 0.001, S.Fig. 5). Meanwhile, IFN γ mRNA was not detected irrespective of exposure to radiation in these cell lines.

1-MT and radiation reduced tumor burden in mouse allografts

Next, the antitumor effects of 1-MT and radiation were evaluated using mouse subcutaneous colorectal tumor models. Oral 1-MT tended to suppress the volume of Colon26-derived tumors after treatment for 2 weeks (p = 0.02). Local radiation (10 Gy/10 fr) significantly suppressed tumor growth (p < 0.001). The combination of 1-MT and radiation markedly reduced tumor volumes compared to the vehicle control or monotherapies (p < 0.001, Fig. 6). The mean tumor volume before treatment was 161 mm3. The mean tumor volumes on day 14 for the vehicle control, 1-MT alone, radiation alone, and combined therapy (1-MT + RT) were 2016 mm3, 1105 mm3, 343 mm3, and 136 mm3, respectively.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of 1-MT and/or radiation on subcutaneous Colon26 tumors. Temporal change in tumor size over treatment course was shown for each group. RT: radiation. Bars indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.001

Full size image

Histological evaluation of subcutaneous tumors

BrdU incorporation of subcutaneous tumor specimens was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 7a, the number of BrdU-positive tumor cells in mice treated with 1-MT was significantly lower than the control (14.5% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001), as was the case with radiation (11.1% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). Combination therapy further reduced the number of BrdU-positive cells (8.3%, p < 0.001).

Fig. 7
figure 7

BrdU incorporation in tumor cells and expression of differentiation markers of immune cells in subcutaneous Colon26 tumors. a BrdU-positive tumor cells, b CD3 + T cells, c CD8 + T cells, d Foxp3 + T cells. RT: radiation. Treatments are shown as horizontal axis labels of the graph. Bars in graphs indicate standard deviations. * p < 0.001

Full size image

Next, we examined tumor-associated lymphocytes and myeloid cells. 1-MT or radiation alone resulted in an increase in CD3 + T cells compared with the control (9.6% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001; 10.0% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001, respectively). The combination of 1-MT and radiation further increased the number of CD3 + T cells (12.1%, p < 0.001, Fig. 7b). Similarly, 1-MT or radiation increased the number of CD8 + T cells compared with the control (4.6% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001; 3.3% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001, respectively), and combination therapy further increased the number of CD8 + T cells (6.8%, p < 0.001, Fig. 7c). In contrast, radiation was not associated with the number of intratumoral Foxp3 + regulatory T cells (1.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.11), while Foxp3 + cells were markedly reduced in mice treated with 1-MT compared with the control (2.1% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). The reduction in Foxp3 + cells by 1-MT was also observed in irradiated mice (0.6% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001; Fig. 7d). The number of CD68 + macrophages and Ly6G + granulocytes were similar among the four treatment groups (S.Fig. 6). Evaluation of tumor-associated microvessels by CD31 staining showed that the MVD was not affected by 1-MT or radiation (S.Fig. 7).

Safety of combination therapy

The body weights of mice were similar among the treatment groups (S.Fig. 8). Blood tests indicated that while radiation induced leukocytopenia, 1-MT did not affect the WBC count. Anemia was not observed in any of the treatment groups, and there were no obvious differences in platelet counts or serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, and Cre among the treatment groups (S.Fig. 9). We also did not detect obvious histological changes in the liver, lung, heart, kidney, or spleen following the 1-MT and/or radiation treatments (S.Fig. 10).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic diagrams illustrating the mechanisms for tumor-suppression by IDO1 blockade and radiation. a Schematic model for IDO1-induced sequential activations of kynurenine-PI3K-Akt axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway in tumor cells, b Presumable mechanisms for activation of antitumor immune response by IDO1 blockade and radiation therapy. 1-MT: 1-methyl tryptophan, RT: radiation, Trp: tryptophan, IDO1: indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1, Kyn: kynurenine, KPM: kynurenine pathway metabolites, LAT1: L-amino acid transporter 1, CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, GCN2: general control non-depressive 2 kinase, AHR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Full size image

Discussion

Several IDO1 inhibitors have been developed for clinical use, including 1-MT, epacadostat, and navoximod. Phase I/II trials using these IDO1 inhibitors were conducted, but no trials using monotherapy treatments reported objective responses [33]. Therefore, recent clinical trials of IDO1 inhibitors have used them as combination therapies with other immunotherapy or chemotherapy drugs, whereas only a few trials have investigated their effectiveness when combined with radiation [34, 35]. For example, a trial investigating malignant brain tumors in childhood reported that only six of 29 patients completed combination therapy of 1-MT, temozolomide, and radiation, with only three patients exhibiting symptomatic improvement by the triplet therapy [35]. However, there have been no clinical trials investigating the combination of an IDO1 inhibitor and radiation in colorectal cancer. In a recent preclinical study, epacadostat enhanced the antitumor effects of radiation on colorectal cancer, but the underlying molecular mechanisms were not addressed [36]. Here, we demonstrated the antitumor effects of 1-MT and radiation in both in vitro and in vivo experiments and investigated the associated molecular mechanisms.

Aberrant Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays a critical role in colorectal carcinogenesis [37]. Dong et al. reported that radiation induced nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and promoted invasive activity in a glioblastoma cell line [38]. In human colorectal cancer cell lines, cells which survive irradiation were shown to have activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and acquired radiation resistance [20]. Furthermore, a clinical study demonstrated that high expression of β-catenin in rectal cancer treated by CRT was associated with poor disease-free survival [39]. In line with these studies, we demonstrated that radiation upregulated gene expression of Axin2 in HCT116, HT-29 and Colon26. Interestingly, 1-MT suppressed this activated Wnt/β-catenin pathway to untreated levels, which indicates that targeting of Wnt/β-catenin pathway with 1-MT may be ideal for combination with radiotherapy.

In the course of anti-tumor immune response, both tumor-promoting and anti-tumor cytokines are released in the tumor microenvironment [40]. Among them, IFN γ is an anti-inflammatory cytokine produced by NK cells, T helper 1 cells and CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and can inhibit directly tumor cell proliferation, increase tumor antigenicity, and suppress angiogenesis [40]. Meanwhile, IFNγ acts as an upstream regulator of IDO1 which metabolizes tryptophan to kynurenine. Kynurenine is further metabolized to quilolinic acid through multiple pathways, and quilolinic acid is finally converted to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [41]. These kynurenine pathway metabolites (KPM) are also incorporated into tumor cells through L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) which is frequently upregulated in various human cancers [42]. KPM activate PI3K, which phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 and Thr308 [43]. Phosphorylated Akt then inactivates GSK3β by inducing its phosphorylation at Ser 9 [44], which results in increased phosphorylation of β-catenin at Ser 552 and promotes β-catenin nuclear translocation [45]. Therefore, it is suggested that IFN γ and IDO1 may upregulate Wnt/β-catenin pathway presumably via the sequential activation of kynurenine-PI3K-Akt axis (Fig. 8a), although it was not examined in the current study. We found that exposure to radiation (4 Gy) did not induce IFN γ whereas only IFN γ, not IFN α or IFN β, induced IDO1 in HCT116, HT-20, and Colon26. These results indicated that the activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway by radiation, as reflected by Axin-2 expression, was at least independent of IFN γ and IDO1 in these colorectal cancer cell lines.

We found that 1-MT and radiation cooperatively induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in HCT116 and Colon26 cells but not in HT-29 cells. Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest is mediated by the activation of p53 protein [18]. HCT116 and Colon26 cells represent wild-type p53, while HT-29 cells carry a p53 mutation [46, 47]. Thus, the distinct status of the p53 gene in these cells may explain the above results regarding cell cycle arrest by radiation among the cell lines. In accordance with our results showing that 1-MT induced G2/M arrest, the administration of anti-IDO1 shRNA increased tumor cells in the G2/M phase in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line [48]. Our observations suggest that 1-MT-induced G2/M arrest may be p53-dependent. Regarding the link between IDO1 and p53, Tang et al. demonstrated that IDO1 promoted cell migration and invasion, which was attenuated by wild-type p53 in lung cancer cell lines [49]. Further studies will be required to clarify the association between IDO1 and p53 in cell cycle regulation.

In our in vivo experiments, the combination of 1-MT and radiation showed the lowest tumor burden among the four treatment groups. Correspondingly, combination therapy resulted in the most pronounced decrease in BrdU-positive cells compared with monotherapies or the untreated control. The antiproliferative effects of 1-MT and radiation appeared to substantiate our in vitro findings. Furthermore, 1-MT and radiation reduced tumor size from the baseline level after a 2-week treatment period. It will be interesting to investigate whether the tumor size reduction lasts beyond the duration of the treatment period or whether longer treatment with 1-MT and radiation is required for sustained therapeutic efficacy.

Our group previously reported that radiation plus interleukin-2 suppressed not only local tumor proliferation but also reduced distant metastasis using a mouse subcutaneous colorectal cancer tumor model [50]. This abscopal effect was accompanied by an increased number of CD4 + splenocytes induced by combination therapy [50]. In the current study, both 1-MT and radiation cooperatively increased CD8 + effector T cells and inhibited Foxp3 + regulatory T cells in allografted tumors. A schema of possible mechanism of anti-tumor immune activities by 1-MT and radiation is shown based on previous reports and the present in vitro and in vivo experiments (Fig. 8b). Whether these alterations in tumor-associated lymphocyte subpopulations caused by combination therapy are accompanied by changes in the systemic immune response remains to be elucidated.

As IDO1 is one of enzymes that catalyze the first and rate-limiting step in the tryptophan-kynurenine signaling cascade, it is relevant to target IDO1 in cancer therapy. In addition, tryptophan breakdown triggered by IDO1 is reported to contribute to cancer-related anemia, fatigue, depression, and decreased quality of life [51,52,53]. On the other hand, tryptophan, kynurenine, and KPMs play a crucial role in health maintenance, and their abnormalities have been implicated in many other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, and neurologic and psychiatric disorders including Parkinson disease, Hunchinton’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and depression [53,54,55]. Therefore, there is a concern that IDO1 blockade in various types of treatment settings may disturb body homeostasis. In our preclinical model, the combination of 1-MT and radiation was well-tolerated, with radiation-induced leukocytopenia being the only observable adverse effect; 1-MT-dependent adverse effects were not observed. These findings are consistent with a previous clinical trial of 1-MT monotherapy for metastatic solid malignancy, which reported that only one out of 48 patients had a grade 3 adverse event [56]. It is of paramount importance to ensure the safety of patients receiving new treatments [57]. In this regard, 1-MT and radiation is considered a promising treatment combination, because 1-MT is already a clinically available drug with few side effects.

There are several limitations of the current study. First, the association between kynurenine-PI3K/Akt and Wnt/β-catenin pathways remains to be clarified by further in vitro studies. The primary target molecules of radiation which are responsible for these pathways and Axin-2 overexpression are not identified. We performed in vivo experiments using a mouse subcutaneous tumor model that differs from an autologous tumor model or clinical carcinogenesis in terms of tumor genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity, an organ-specific tumor microenvironment, and inherent biological differences between species. A six-to-eight-week interval between preoperative CRT and surgery is recommended for advanced lower rectal cancer patients, because the timing of cell death induced by radiation is delayed [58]. However, as mentioned above, the prolonged effects of combination of 1-MT and radiation were not evaluated.

Conclusions

This is the first study that investigated the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of the combination of 1-MT and radiation both in vitro and in vivo. The nice thing of the current study is that radiation-induced activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was effectively canceled by 1-MT in the combination treatment, as we expected. Apart from the modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, the combination of 1-MT and radiation and resulted in marked tumor suppression via multimodal mechanisms, including induction of cell cycle arrest, and enhancement of the antitumor immune responses. Here, we demonstrated an important example of targeting not only tumor cells but also tumor microenvironment in cancer treatment.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

1-MT:

1-Methyltryptophan

7-AAD:

7-Aminoactinomycin D

AHR:

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor

BrdU:

Bromodeoxyuridine

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CRT:

Chemoradiation therapy

CT:

Cycle threshold

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4

DAPI:

4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

Fr:

Fraction

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GCN2:

General control non-depressive 2 kinase

HPF:

High power field

IDO1:

Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1

IFN:

Interferon

Kyn:

Kynurenine

KPM:

Kynurenine pathway metabolites

LAT1:

L-amino acid transporter 1

MTS:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium

MVD:

Microvessel density

pCR:

Pathological complete response

RT:

Radiation therapy

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SF:

Survival fraction

siRNA:

Small interfering RNA

Trp:

Tryptophan

References

  1. Kawai K, Ishihara S, Nozawa H, Hata K, Kiyomatsu T, Tanaka T, et al. Recent advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2017;1:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen A, Nagtegaal D, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosset F, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1114–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crane H, Skibber M, Feig W, Vauthey JN, Thames HD, Curley SA, et al. Response to preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97:517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maas M, Nelemans J, Valentini V, Das P, Rödel C, Kuo LJ, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:835–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L, De Paoli A, Rodel C, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stipa F, Chessin B, Shia J, Paty PB, Weiser M, Temple LK, et al. A pathologic complete response of rectal cancer to preoperative combined-modality therapy results in improved oncological outcome compared with those who achieve no downstaging on the basis of preoperative endorectal ultrasonography. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1047–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Gijn W, Marijnen M, Nagtegaal D, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, et al. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:979–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, et al. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2773–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connell J, Colangelo H, Beart W, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1927–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gérard P, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Laffay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1638–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmoll J, Stein A, Van Cutsem E, Price T, Hofheinz RD, Nordlinger B, et al. Pre- and postoperative capecitabine without or with oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: PETACC 6 Trial by EORTC GITCG and ROG, AIO, AGITG, BGDO, and FFCD. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:17–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawai K, Sunami E, Hata K, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Otani K, et al. Phase I/II study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy With TEGAFIRI for locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17:240–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R, Gollins S, Samuel LM, Glynne-Jones R, Harte R, et al. ARISTOTLE: a phase III trial comparing concurrent capecitabine with capecitabine and irinotecan (Ir) chemoradiation as preoperative treatment for MRI-defined locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl):4101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buckley M, Lynam-Lennon N, O’Neill H, O’Sullivan J. Targeting hallmarks of cancer to enhance radiosensitivity in gastrointestinal cancers. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:298–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Löbrich M, Jeggo A. The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:861–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharabi B, Lim M, DeWeese L, Drake G. Radiation and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy: radiosensitisation and potential mechanisms of synergy. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e498-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Emons G, Spitzner M, Reineke S, Möller J, Auslander N, Kramer F, et al. Chemoradiotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer cells is mediated by wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:1481–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Santhanam S, Alvarado M, Ciorba A. Therapeutic targeting of inflammation and tryptophan metabolism in colon and gastrointestinal cancer. Transl Res. 2016;167:67–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thaker I, Rao S, Bishnupuri S, Kerr TA, Foster L, Marinshaw JM, et al. IDO1 metabolites activate beta-catenin signaling to promote cancer cell proliferation and colon tumorigenesis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(416–25):e411–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Munn H, Shafizadeh E, Attwood T, Bondarev I, Pashine A, Mellor L. Inhibition of T cell proliferation by macrophage tryptophan catabolism. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1363–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Munn H, Sharma D, Baban B, Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D, et al. GCN2 kinase in T cells mediates proliferative arrest and anergy induction in response to indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Immunity. 2005;22:633–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma D, Baban B, Chandler P, Hou DY, Singh N, Yagita H, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells from mouse tumor-draining lymph nodes directly activate mature Tregs via indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2570–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Puccetti P, Fallarino F. Generation of T cell regulatory activity by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and tryptophan catabolism. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008;40:101–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li F, Zhang R, Li S, Liu J. IDO1: an important immunotherapy target in cancer treatment. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;47:70–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferdinande L, Decaestecker C, Verset L, Mathieu A, Moles Lopez X, et al. Clinicopathological significance of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 expression in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:141–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carvajal-Hausdorf E, Mani N, Velcheti V, Schalper A, Rimm L. Objective measurement and clinical significance of IDO1 protein in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang CC, Yamauchi KA, Vlassakis J, Sinkala E, Duncombe TA, Herr AE. Single cell-resolution western blotting. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1508–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Euhus DM, Hudd C, LaRegina MC, Johnson FE. Tumor measurement in the nude mouse. J Surg Oncol. 1986;31:229–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu T, Dancsok R, Nielsen O. Indoleamine dioxygenase inhibitors: clinical rationale and current development. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson S, Pacholczyk R, Aguilera D, Al-Basheer A, Bajaj M, Berrong Z, et al. IMMU-04. First-In-Children Phase 1b Study Using The Ido Pathway Inhibitor Indoximod In Combination With Radiation And Chemotherapy For Children With Newly Diagnosed Dipg (NCT02502708, NLG2105). Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:i27.

  35. Johnson S, Aguilera D, Al-Basheer A, Castellino RC, Eaton BR, Esiashvili N, et al. Front-line therapy of DIPG using the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod in combination with radiation and chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2018;78 Suppl:CT004.

  36. Chen B, Alvarado M, Iticovici M, Kau NS, Park H, Parikh PJ, et al. Interferon-induced IDO1 mediates radiation resistance and is a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:451–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Markowitz D, Bertagnolli M. Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2449–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dong Z, Zhou L, Han N, Zhang M, Lyu X. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway involvement in ionizing radiation-induced invasion of U87 glioblastoma cells. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191:672–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gomez-Millan J, Perez L, Aroca I, Del Mar DM, De Luque V, Román A, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer induces changes in the expression of nuclear β-catenin: prognostic significance. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ivashkiv LB. IFNγ: signalling, epigenetics and roles in immunity, metabolism, disease and cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:545–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Venkateswaran N, Conacci-Sorrell M. Kynurenine: an oncometabolite in colon cancer. Cell Stress. 2020;4:24–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaira K, Oriuchi N, Imai H, Shimizu K, Yanagitani N, Sunaga N, et al. l-type amino acid transporter 1 and CD98 expression in primary and metastatic sites of human neoplasms. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2380–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bishnupuri S, Alvarado M, Khouri N, Shabsovich M, Chen B, Dieckgraefe BK, et al. IDO1 and kynurenine pathway metabolites activate PI3K-Akt signaling in the neoplastic colon epithelium to promote cancer cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1138–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cross DA, Alessi DR, Cohen P, Andjelkovich M, Hemmings BA. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B. Nature. 1995;378:785–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee G, Goretsky T, Managlia E, Dirisina R, Singh AP, Brown JB, et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling mediates beta-catenin activation in intestinal epithelial stem and progenitor cells in colitis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:869–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ahmed D, Eide W, Eilertsen A, Danielsen SA, Eknæs M, Hektoen M, et al. Epigenetic and genetic features of 24 colon cancer cell lines. Oncogenesis. 2013;2: e71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Castle C, Loewer M, Boegel S, de Graaf J, Bender C, Tadmor AD, et al. Immunomic, genomic and transcriptomic characterization of CT26 colorectal carcinoma. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Maleki Vareki S, Rytelewski M, Figueredo R, Chen D, Ferguson PJ, Vincent M, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase mediates immune-independent human tumor cell resistance to olaparib, gamma radiation, and cisplatin. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2778–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tang D, Yue L, Yao R, Zhou L, Yang Y, Lu L, et al. P53 prevent tumor invasion and metastasis by down-regulating IDO in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:54548–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yasuda K, Nirei T, Tsuno NH, Nagawa H, Kitayama J. Intratumoral injection of interleukin-2 augments the local and abscopal effects of radiotherapy in murine rectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1257–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim S, Miller BJ, Stefanek ME, Miller AH. Inflammation-induced activation of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase pathway: relevance to cancer-related fatigue. Cancer. 2015;121:2129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Barreto FS, Chaves Filho AJM, de Araújo MCCR, de Moraes MO, de Moraes MEA, Maes M, et al. Tryptophan catabolites along the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase pathway as a biological link between depression and cancer. Behav Pharmacol. 2018;29:165–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lanser L, Kink P, Egger EM, Willenbacher W, Fuchs D, Weiss G, et al. Inflammation-induced tryptophan breakdown is related with anemia, fatigue, and depression in cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Comai S, Bertazzo A, Brughera M, Crotti S. Tryptophan in health and disease. Adv Clin Chem. 2020;95:165–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wee HN, Liu JJ, Ching J, Kovalik JP, Lim SC. The kynurenine pathway in acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52:771–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Soliman H, Minton E, Han S, Ismail-Khan R, Neuger A, Khambati F, et al. A phase I study of indoximod in patients with advanced malignancies. Oncotarget. 2016;7:22928–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American society of clinical oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2377–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cotte E, Passot G, Decullier E, Maurice C, Glehen O, François Y, et al. Pathologic response, when increased by longer interval, is a marker but not the cause of good prognosis in rectal cancer: 17-year follow-up of the lyon R90–01 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:544–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Medical English Service (Kyoto, Japan) for editing our manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [Challenging Research (Exploratory): grant number; 20K21626, and B: grant number; 21H02778]. The funding body played no roles in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hiroaki Nozawa and Tetsuro Taira contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan

    Hiroaki Nozawa, Tetsuro Taira, Hirofumi Sonoda, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Yuzo Nagai, Shinya Abe & Soichiro Ishihara

Authors
  1. Hiroaki Nozawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tetsuro Taira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hirofumi Sonoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kazuhito Sasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koji Murono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shigenobu Emoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuichiro Yokoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuzo Nagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shinya Abe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Soichiro Ishihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HN, TT and HS contributed to the conception, design and acquisition of data. KS, KM, SE, YY, YN, SA and SI contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. HN, TT and HS contributed to drafting the main manuscript text. HN and TT prepared figures and supplementary information. KS, KM, SE, YY, YN, SA and SI contributed to revising it critically for significant intellectual content. All reviewed and approved the final version for publication.

Author information

HN and TT have contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroaki Nozawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed under the policies of the Animal Ethics Committee of The University of Tokyo (approval number: M-P19-035), and in accordance with Law for the Humane Treatment and Management of Animals issued by Ministry of the Environment, Japan. All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nozawa, H., Taira, T., Sonoda, H. et al. Enhancement of radiation therapy by indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 inhibition through multimodal mechanisms. BMC Cancer 23, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10539-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10539-5

Keywords

  • Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Radiation therapy
  • Wnt/β-catenin pathway

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us