Skip to main content
Download PDF

Favorable locoregional control in clinically node-negative hormone-receptor positive breast cancer with low 21-gene recurrence scores: a single-institution study with 10-year follow-up

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 1217 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have shown a lower likelihood of locoregional recurrences in patients with a low 21-gene recurrence score (RS). In this single-institution study, we investigated whether there are any associations between different cutoff values of 21-gene RS, histopathological factors, and outcome in patients with long-term follow-up.

Methods

The study included 61 patients who had early-stage (I-II) clinically node-negative hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer and were tested with the 21-gene RS assay between February 2010 and February 2013. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome characteristics were analyzed.

Results

The median age was 48 years (range, 29–72 years). Patients with high histologic grade (HG), Ki-67 ≥ 25%, or Ki-67 ≥ 30% were more likely to have intermediate/high RS (≥ 18). Based on the 21-gene RS assay, only 19 patients (31%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 112 months, 3 patients developed locoregional recurrences (4.9%), which were treated with endocrine therapy alone. Among patients treated with endocrine treatment alone (n = 42), the following clinicopathological characteristics were not found to be significantly associated with 10-year locoregional recurrence free survival (LRRFS): age < 40 years, age < 50 years, high histological or nuclear grade, high Ki-67-scores (≥ 15%, ≥ 20%, ≥ 25%, ≥ 30%), presence of lymphovascular invasion, luminal-A type, multifocality, lymph node positivity, tumor size more than 2 cm, RS ≥ 18, and RS > 11. However, patients with RS ≥ 16 had significantly poorer 10-year LRRFS compared to those with RS < 16 (75% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.039).

Conclusions

The results suggest that patients with clinically node-negative disease and RS ≥ 16 are more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapies. However, those with RS < 16 have an excellent outcome and local control in long-term follow-up with endocrine treatment alone.

Peer Review reports

Background

Multigene prognostic gene assays are used to decide on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to endocrine treatment in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The goal is to guide the personalized management in the contemporary era of breast-cancer treatment [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Particularly, the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay (Oncoype DX™, Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA) has been recommended by the 2022 guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and is widely used in the USA [7].

The utility of this genetic assay has been validated in numerous clinical studies, including the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) and RxPONDER trials on clinically lymph-node-negative and positive patients [8, 9]. The TAILORx trial reported no chemotherapy benefit in women who were older than 50 years of age, but in women who were 50 years of age or younger, adjuvant chemotherapy improved outcomes if the recurrence score was 16 to 25 [8]. Similarly, recent findings from the RxPONDER trial indicated that premenopausal women with node-positive disease and RS of 25 or lower have a better outcome with endocrine treatment in addition to chemotherapy compared to those with endocrine-treatment alone. Postmenopausal women with similar clinicopathological features did not show any benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy [9].

Previous studies demonstrated no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer classified as molecularly defined luminal A-type or immunohistochemically classified luminal A-type. These tumors have an excellent prognosis with a low Ki-67 index and progesterone receptor positivity [10,11,12]. However, due to the interobserver variability in assessment of the Ki-67 score [13, 14], its utility has been limited and is not accepted worldwide in tailoring the adjuvant treatment of early-stage hormone-receptor positive breast cancer.

A few recent reports have also shown a lower likelihood of locoregional recurrences in patients with a low 21-gene RS [15,16,17,18]. In this single-institution study, we investigated whether there are any associations of locoregional recurrence (LRR) with higher 21-gene RS in patients with early-stage ER-positive disease in long-term follow-up. We also investigated the associations of traditional biomarkers and histopathological factors with the Oncotype-DX recurrence RS.

Methods

The study included consecutive female patients with early-stage clinically node-negative ER- positive breast cancer who were tested with the 21-gene RS assay and underwent surgery for breast cancer at the Acibadem Maslak Hospital with a follow-up of more than 5 years after surgery. Prospectively maintained data were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome characteristics were analyzed. The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee at the Acibadem University, Faculty of Medicine.

Selected representative paraffine sections of the index tumor of the patients were studied by Genomic Health (Redwood City, CA, USA) to assess the Oncotype DX RS. The score was determined by 21-gene reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue as described previously [19]. RT-PCR expression analysis (16 cancer-related genes and 5 reference genes) evaluates the expression of 16 cancer-related genes normalized by the expression of five reference genes. The result is a numeric value on a scale of 0 to 100.

Risk categories were determined according to RS as follows: a) low risk for scores < 18, b) intermediate risk for scores of 18–30, and c) high risk for scores ≥ 31, as previously reported [2]. Patients were also stratified into three risk categories based on different RS cutoff scores: low risk (RS < 11), intermediate risk (RS 11–25), and high risk (RS ≥ 26), as suggested previously [8].

The results of the 21-gene RS assay were prospectively incorporated in the treatment plan as recommended [2]. Most low-risk patients were treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereas most high-risk patients received a combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. The treatment of patients with intermediate RS was variable and depended on various clinicopathological features and individual choices. RS was not routinely considered in the selection of locoregional therapy. The results were correlated with histopathological factors including tumor size (≤ 2 cm vs > 2 cm), nuclear grade (NG), histological grade (HG), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and different cutoff values of Ki-67 (≤ 10%, ≤ 15%, ≤ 20%, or ≤ 25%).

ER or PR positivity was considered for any nuclear immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining > 1%. HER2 positivity was determined by IHC and FISH findings, whereas Ki-67 scores were determined as suggested previously [13]. The tumor subtypes were defined as follows according to the IHC staining [20]: luminal A: ER( +) or PR( +), HER2-neu (-), Ki-67 < 20%; luminal B: ER( +) or PR( +), HER2-neu ( +) and/or Ki-67 ≥ 20%; non-luminal: HER2-neu( +), ER (-) PR(-) HER2-neu ( +); and triple-negative: ER(-) PR (-) HER2-neu (-).

Correlations were assessed between Oncotype DX expressions of ER, PR, or HER2, and IHC expressions of ER, PR, or HER2. Clinicopathological variables included patient age at breast-cancer diagnosis, tumor size, histological type of tumor, LVI, 21-gene RS result, local and systemic treatment, and clinical outcome. For multifocal/multicentric carcinomas, the size of the largest tumor and the highest RS result were recorded. For one patient with metachronous bilateral ER + /HER2 − breast carcinomas with low RS, only the data pertaining to the first tumor were included. The institutional database and electronic medical records were reviewed to record the date of last follow-up, date of death, and the date and type of LRR and distant recurrence.

Statistical analysis

The statistical software program SPSS 25 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences; SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. To assess the differences between the groups, categorical variables were evaluated by Pearson’s chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests in two-tailed univariate analyses. Overall survival was calculated from the date of pathological diagnosis of breast cancer to the date of last follow-up. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used for the survival curves test, and the log-rank test was used to compare different prognostics affecting the outcome, including different RS values.

Disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed based on local and systemic metastases, and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were analysed based on breast-cancer-related mortality. LRR was defined as invasive breast cancer involving the ipsilateral breast parenchyma, axilla, regional lymph nodes, and chest wall and identified more than 6 months from the initial diagnosis of breast cancer. LRR-free survival was analysed by considering the locoregional metastases. Univariate association of the RS score with LRR-free survival was also examined among a subset of women treated with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy using as described above. P-values were two-sided, and a p-value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The study included 61 consecutive female patients with early-stage breast cancer and clinically node negative disease between February 2010 and February 2013. The median age was 48 years (range, 29–72 years). Fifty-three patients were diagnosed with Stage I (86.9%), and 8 patients had Stage II (13.1%) following surgery. The majority of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS; n = 40; 65.6%) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB, n = 21, 34.4%). Of the 61 patients, 7 (11.5%) had axillary lymph-node positivity, and 6 patients underwent axillary dissection following SLNB. The demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with clinically node-negative hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer tested with 21-gene recurrence score assay
Full size table
Table 2 Correlation of 21-gene Recurrence score (RS) including different cut-off values with Ki 67 scores and histopathological factors
Full size table

The majority of the patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (81.6%) or tumors with low or intermediate nuclear (NG, n = 45, 73.8%) or histological grade (HG, n = 51, 83.6%). All tumors were hormone-receptor positive and HER2-negative, and the majority had no lymphovascular invasion (LVI, n = 49, 80.3%). The median Ki-67 score was 15% (range, 1%-57%). The associations between histopathological variables and different RS cutoff scores are shown in Table 2. Patients with high HG were more likely to have RS ≥ 18, whereas patients with high NG were more likely to have RS ≥ 26 or > 31. Similarly, patients with Ki-67 ≥ 25% or ≥ 30% were more likely to have RS ≥ 18 or ≥ 26. Briefly, patients with high HG, Ki-67 ≥ 25%, or Ki-67 ≥ 30% were more likely to have intermediate/high RS based on RS ≥ 18 (Table 2). The other associations did not reach the statistical significance.

Outcome

Based on the 21-gene RS assay, only 19 patients (31%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 2 patients had postmastectomy radiation (9.5%). At a median follow-up of 112 months (range, 60–160 months), 3 patients developed locoregional recurrences (4.9%), which were treated with endocrine therapy alone. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients are shown in Table 3. Of these, two patients had locoregional recurrences including axillary and supraclavicular region with adjuvant radiation to the chest wall. The other patient had a local recurrence in the breast in a previously operated region of the primary tumor despite applying adjuvant radiation to the breast following surgery. All three patients had unifocal tumors with IHC classification as luminal A, ER and PR positivity > 50%, Ki-67 < 20%, and had locoregional recurrences at a median time of 105 months (range, 96–107 months) on long-term follow-up. Interestingly, all patients had RS ≥ 16, which is an intermediate score (11–25) according to the TAILOR-X and RxPONDER trials.

Table 3 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with locoregional recurrence
Full size table

The 10-year DFS and LRRFS rates were 92.8%, whereas the 10-year DSS rate was 100% in the present cohort. Patients with RS ≥ 16 were found to have a poorer 10-year LRRFS at 88% compared to those with RS < 16 at 100% (p = 0.149, Fig. 1a). Among patients treated with endocrine treatment alone (n = 42), the clinicopathological characteristics not significantly found to be associated with 10-year LRRFS included age < 40 years, age < 50 years, high histological or nuclear grade, high Ki-67-scores (≥ 15%,, ≥ 20%, > 25%, > 30%), presence of lymphovascular invasion, luminal A type, multifocality, lymph node positivity, tumor size more than 2 cm, RS ≥ 18, and RS ≥ 11. However, patients with RS ≥ 16 had significantly poorer 10-year LRRFS and DFS (100% for RS < 16 vs. 75% for RS ≥ 16, p = 0.039), as demonstrated in Table 4 and Fig. 1b.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Locoregional recurrence-free survival in patients with recurrence score (RS) < 16 (n = 25) vs. RS ≥ 16 (n = 36) in the whole cohort (n = 61, p = 0.149). b Locoregional recurrence-free survival in patients with RS < 16 (n = 25) vs. RS ≥ 16 (n = 17) without adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 42) (p = 0.039)

Full size image
Table 4 Clinicopathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence free survival free survival (LRRFS) (DFS is equal to LRRFS since none of the patients developed distant metastases)
Full size table

Discussion

Among various multigene prognostic gene assays, the 21-gene RS assay has been more widely used in patients who are classified as early stage according to AJCC TNM 8th edition, have ER + /HER2- breast cancer, or are to be spared from unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapies as recommended by the NCCN guidelines when detected with low RS [7]. The 21-gen RS assay was initially developed to assess the distant recurrence risk and was validated in patient samples from the from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trials B-14 and B-20 [2]. However, its clinical utility to estimate the locoregional recurrence risk is less studied so far and not well established in patients with long-term follow-up.

In this single-institution study with 10-year follow-up, we demonstrated that patients with early-stage ER-positive HER2(-) breast cancer, RS < 16, and mostly presenting with lymph node-negative breast cancer have excellent prognosis with endocrine treatment alone without any locoregional recurrence. However, patients with RS ≥ 16 were found to have a poorer 10-year DFS and LRRFS when treated with endocrine treatment alone, similar to other recent findings [8]. The TAILORx-study included only the clinically node-negative patients. Associations between various RS cutoff values and chemotherapy to improve the DFS have demonstrated some benefit in patients ≤ 50 years old with RS in the range of 16 to 25. Their 9-year DFS rate was 83.3% in a patient subgroup treated with endocrine treatment alone [8]. Notably, our study cohort included mostly premenopausal patients with a median age of 48 years and patients with RS ≥ 16. Thus, the population has relatively young age, is expected to have long-term survival, and are more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapies.

Mamounas et al. first studied the association of locoregional recurrence with 21-gene RS assay scores in tamoxifen-treated patients with node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer in the NSABP B-14 and B-20 studies [15]. Of 895 tamoxifen-treated patients, significant associations were found between RS and LRR in patient cohorts of both trials, and RS was also demonstrated as an independent significant predictor of LRR in multivariate analysis. Similarly, Turashvili et al. further investigated the relationship between 21-gene RS and LRR risk among 2326 patients with node-negative ER + /HER2- breast cancer who were treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2008 to 2013 [16]. At a median follow-up of 53 months, patients with intermediate and high RS were more likely to have LRR compared to the patients with low RS. The hazard ratios were 2.81 (95% CI 1.41–5.56, p < 0.01) and 4.61 (95% CI 1.90–11.19, p < 0.01), respectively. A recent report from the same institution also indicated that extremely low LRR rates of 0.7% (8/1184) were observed among patients with a low RS < 18 treated with endocrine therapy alone [17]. However, Thaker et al. [21] could not find a correlation between ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and RS, even though Ki-67 expression was significantly associated with both IBTR (p = 0.019) and RS (p = 0.002). Furthermore, an increased risk of locoregional recurrences was also demonstrated in node-positive ER-positive patients with high RS, which may justify postmastectomy radiation or more extensive radiation as an independent factor [22,23,24,25].

Finally, a recent meta-analysis including 16 studies with 21,037 patients investigated the association of RS with LRR in ER + /HER2- breast cancer with a mean follow-up of 66.4 months [18]. Patients with RS of 18–30 and RS > 30 were significantly more likely to develop LRR than those with RS < 18. The increased relative risks (RRs) were 1.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32–2.37) and 3.45, (95% CI: 2.63–4.53), respectively. Similarly, by using TAILORx cutoffs, those with RS ≥ 26 had an increased risk of LRR with an RR of 2.49 [95% CI: 0.68–9.39] compared to those with RS < 11.

In the present report, our study cohort included mostly patients with luminal A-type node-negative disease and a low Ki-67 index. In concordance with previous reports, our findings also have demonstrated that the 21-gene RS < 16 was the sole significant factor associated with the 10-year LRRFS among patients with good clinicopathological characteristics on long-term follow-up. The findings in the present study also indicated that patients with high HG or Ki-67 ≥ 25% were more likely to have intermediate/high RS based on RS ≥ 18, which is in concordance with some previous studies that similarly demonstrated a significant association between increasing RS and higher Ki-67 values [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, although the Ki-67 proliferation value is important, it is not the sole determinant of the Oncotype DX score [26]. Furthermore, some tumors with a low RS may reveal surprisingly high Ki-67, whereas a small percentage of luminal-A-like tumors with a low Ki-67 index have RS > 25, and chemotherapy is recommended in such cases [27, 32]. Moreover, its clinical utility has been questioned due to the lack of consensus on scoring due to interobserver variability and cutoff value [20], and it has only “AJCC Level III” in the new AJCC edition. However, a major limitation of the present study is the relatively small number of patients in the cohort, despite the long-term follow-up. Therefore, we cannot conclude that tumor grade and Ki-67 may replace the 21-gene assay to help physicians to make an accurate decision chemotherapy use based on the findings of this study.

Due to the limited use of Ki-67 worldwide, alternative nomograms or alternative multivariable models called Magee Equations™ (ME) were developed to estimate the oncotype score at lower cost [31, 33, 34]. These models use routinely reported histopathology and breast-cancer biomarker data to provide a score similar to the oncotype score to be used in the “Magee Decision Algorithm™” along with the mitosis score [34]. Other models being developed to predict the 21-gene RS have alternatively included nomograms based on routine clinicopathological variables, including age, tumor size, tumor grade, PR status, LVI, and histological type of breast cancer [33]. However, further prospective studies are needed to validate whether these models could accurately replace the 21-gene RS assay.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that patients with RS ≥ 16 are more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapies in long-term follow-up to obtain excellent outcomes and local control. Larger prospective randomized studies are required to further investigate the clinical utility of RS testing to estimate the LRR risk and to establish better locoregional control in high-risk cases. Large prospective trials should study whether alternative models, including clinicopathological variables with lower cost, could replace the 21-gene RS for selected patients to make a decision about the adjuvant systemic treatment. Until then, genomic tests including the 21-gene RS remain as the gold-standard tools for determining the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node-negative HR( +) patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;34(25):1999–2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(23):3726–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sparano JA, Paik S. Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):721–8 ([PubMed: 18258979]).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):55–65 ([PubMed: 20005174]).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossi PG, Lebeau A, Canelo-Aybar C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Quinn C, Langendam M, et al. Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(9):1503–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NCCN 2022, www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf

  8. Sparano JA, Gray R, Makover DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(2):111–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. 21-Gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(25):2336–47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108873 Clinical Trial.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J, et al. Ki-67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):736–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gluz O, Liedtke C, Huober J, Peyro-Saint-Paul H, Kates RE, Kreipe HH, et al. Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(6):1035–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishimukai A, Yagi T, Yanai A, Miyagawa Y, Enomoto Y, Murase K, et al. High Ki-67 expression and low progesterone receptor expression could independently lead to a worse prognosis for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(3):204–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A’Hern R, Bartlett J, Coombes RC, Cuzick J, et al. International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working G. Assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer working group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(22):1656–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Varga Z, Diebold J, Dommann-Scherrer C, Frick H, Kaup D, Noske A, et al. How reliable is Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in grade 2 breast carcinomas? A QA study of the Swiss Working Group of Breast- and Gynecopathologists. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5): e37379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP, et al. Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1677–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Turashvili G, Chou JF, Brogi E, Morrow M, Dickler M, Norton L, Hudis C, Wen HY. 21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;166(1):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4381-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Turashvili G, Brogi E, Morrow M, Dickler M, Norton L, Hudis C, Wen HY. Breast carcinoma with 21-gene recurrence score lower than 18: rate of locoregional recurrence in a large series with clinical follow-up. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3985-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Davey MG, Cleere EF, O’Donnell JP, Gaisor S, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ. Value of the 21-gene expression assay in predicting locoregional recurrence rates in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;193(3):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06580-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cronin M, Pho M, Dutta D, Stephans JC, Shak S, Kiefer MC, Esteban JM, Baker JB. Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues: development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(1):35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Untch M, Gerber B, Harbeck N, Jackisch C, Marschner N, von Minckwitz VMG, Loibl S. 13th St. Gallen international breast cancer conference 2013: primary therapy of early breast cancer evidence, controversies, consensus – opinion of a German team of experts. Breast Care. 2013;8(3):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Thaker NG, Hoffman KE, Stauder MC, Shaitelman SF, Strom EA, Tereffe W, et al. The 21-gene recurrence score complements IBTR Estimates in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, lymph node-negative breast cancer. Springerplus. 2015;4:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0840-y eCollection 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jegadeesh NK, Kim S, Prabhu RS, Oprea GM, Yu DS, Godette KG, et al. The 21-gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1088–94. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4252-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodward WA, Barlow WE, Jagsi R, Buchholz TA, Shak S, Baehneret F, et al. Association between 21-gene assay recurrence score and locoregional recurrence rates in patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(4):505–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mamounas EP, Liu Q, Paik S, Baehner FL, Tang G, Jeong JH, et al. 21-gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in node-positive/ER-positive breast cancer treated with chemo-endocrine therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(4):259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodman CR, Seagle BL, Kocherginsky M, Donnelly ED, Shahabi S, Strauss JB. 21-Gene recurrence score assay predicts benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy in T1–2 N1 breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(16):3878–87. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahebjam S, Aloyz R, Pilavdzic D, Brisson ML, Ferrario C, Bouganim N, et al. Ki-67 is a major, but not the sole determinant of Oncotype Dx recurrence score. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(9):1342–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gwin K, Pinto M, Tavassoli FA. Complementary value of the Ki-67 proliferation index to the oncotype DX recurrence score. Int J Surg Pathol. 2009;17(4):303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams DJ, Cohen C, Darrow M, Page AJ, Chastain B, Adams AL. Proliferation (Ki-67 and phospohistone H3) and oncotype DX recurrence score in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011;19(5):431–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abanell J, Gonzalez A, Ruiz-Borrego M, Alba E, García-Saenz JA, Corominas JM, et al. Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(3):625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Acs G, Esposito NN, Kiluk J, Loftus L, Laronga C. A mitotically active, cellular tumor stroma and/or inflammatory cells associated with tumor cells may contribute to intermediate or high Oncotype DX recurrence scores in low-grade invasive breast carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2011;25(4):556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nitz U, Gluz O, Christgen M, Kates RE, Clemens M, Malteret W, et al. Reducing chemotherapy use in clinically high-risk, genomically low-risk pN0 and pN1 early breast cancer patients: five-year data from the prospective, randomised phase 3 west German study group (WSG) PlanB trial. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2017;165(3):573–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Allison KH, Kandalaft PL, Sitlani CM, Dintzis SM, Gown AM. Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):413–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orucevic A, Bell JL, McNabb AP, Heidel RE. Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2017;163(1):51–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhargava R, Clark BZ, Carter GJ, Brufsky AM, Dabbs DJ. The healthcare value of the Magee Decision Algorithm™: use of Magee Equations™ and mitosis score to safely forgo molecular testing in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(8):1563–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0521-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Cihan Uras, Neslihan Cabioglu & Halil Kara

  2. Department of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Neslihan Cabioglu

  3. Department of Pathology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Fatma Tokat & Umit Ince

  4. Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ozlem Er & Taner Korkmaz

  5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Nuran Bese

Authors
  1. Cihan Uras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neslihan Cabioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatma Tokat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ozlem Er
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Halil Kara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Taner Korkmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nuran Bese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Umit Ince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was designed by CU, and NC. The initial search, literature organization, analyses and manuscript writing were performed by NC and CU. Data acquisition was provided by CU, OE, NC, HK, TK, FT, UI, NB, Critical comments and typesetting corrections on the final version were made by CU, OE, NC, HK, TK, FT, UI, and NB. All authors have read and revised the manuscript critically. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neslihan Cabioglu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethical committee of Acibadem University, Medical Faculty in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration (2022–09/08). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The following authors “CU, NC, FT, ÖE, HK, TK, NB, UI” have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uras, C., Cabioglu, N., Tokat, F. et al. Favorable locoregional control in clinically node-negative hormone-receptor positive breast cancer with low 21-gene recurrence scores: a single-institution study with 10-year follow-up. BMC Cancer 22, 1217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10308-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10308-w

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us