Skip to main content
Download PDF

Novel effect of the high risk-HPV E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site on polarity protein expression

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 1015 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Oncogenic Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) base their transforming potential on the action of both E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins, which perform cooperative or antagonistic actions and thus interfere with a variety of relevant cellular targets. Among them, the expression of some PDZ-containing polarity proteins, as DLG1 and hScrib, is altered during the HPV life cycle and the consequent malignant transformation. Together with the well-established interference of E6 with PDZ proteins, we have recently shown that E7 viral oncoprotein is also responsible for the changes in abundance and localization of DLG1 observed in HPV-associated lesions. Given that the mechanisms involved remained only partially understood, we here thoroughly analyse the contribution of a crucial E7 post-translational modification: its CKII-dependent phosphorylation. Moreover, we extended our studies to hScrib, in order to investigate possible conserved regulatory events among diverse PDZ targets of HPV.

Methods

We have acutely analysed the expression of DLG1 and hScrib in restrictive conditions for E7 phosphorylation by CKII in epithelial culture cells by western blot and confocal fluorescence microscopy. We made use of genome-edited HPV-positive cells, specific inhibitors of CKII activity and transient expression of the viral oncoproteins, including a mutant version of E7.

Results

We here demonstrate that the functional phosphorylation of E7 oncoprotein by the CKII cellular kinase, a key regulatory event for its activities, is also crucial to counteract the E6-mediated degradation of the PDZ-polarity protein DLG1 and to promote its subcellular redistribution. Moreover, we show that the CKII-dependent phosphorylation of E7 is able to control the expression of another PDZ target of HPV: hScrib. Remarkably, we found this is a shared feature among different oncogenic HPV types, suggesting a common path towards viral pathogenesis.

Conclusions

The present study sheds light into the mechanisms behind the misexpression of PDZ-polarity proteins during HPV infections. Our findings stress the relevance of the CKII-mediated regulation of E7 activities, providing novel insights into the joint action of HPV oncoproteins and further indicating a conserved and most likely crucial mechanism during the viral life cycle and the associated transformation.

Peer Review reports

Background

Persistent infection with high-risk HPVs, as HPV-16 and HPV-18, is linked to the development of cervical cancer, one of the most frequent cancers in women worldwide, especially in developing countries. Moreover, HPV infections have also been associated with other neoplastic events, such as vulvar, anal, vaginal, penile, and head-and-neck cancers, pointing to HPV as a major infectious carcinogen in humans [1].

The main transforming activities of high-risk HPVs depend on the expression of both E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins. These proteins have the ability to interact and interfere with a large number of key cellular regulators to induce a favourable cellular setting for efficient viral replication [2,3,4,5,6]. Furthermore, the continuous expression of these oncoproteins during persistent HPV infections can lead to cell transformation. Among their strategic functions, E7 proteins stimulate cell cycle progression, at least partly by targeting the pRb pocket protein, while E6 inhibits apoptosis through affecting the p53 oncosuppresor [7]. However, the number of different cellular protein partners and the diverse biological processes targeted by these viral proteins is very large and, in addition, both E6 and E7 can have cooperative or antagonistic activities when subverting a particular cell factor or pathway [6].

Among E6 partners, the intriguing PDZ (PSD95/DLG1/ZO-1) domain-containing proteins have been extensively analysed [8, 9]. The high-risk HPV-derived E6 proteins interact with the PDZ domains via a PDZ binding motif (PBM) located in the C-terminus [8, 10]. The PDZ cellular proteins are molecular scaffolding elements that orchestrate protein complexes involved in the maintenance of cell–cell contacts, cell polarity and cell signalling networks, all processes whose deregulation can be crucial to malignant transformation [9, 11, 12]. Therefore, the association of HPV E6 with PDZ proteins, and the consequences of these interactions regarding PDZ proteins misexpression, have been widely investigated, with a focus on the role of these events in cancer development. Moreover, some studies indicate that the presence of HPV E7, which is expressed together with E6 during HPV-induced tumorigenesis, can impact on the E6-mediated deregulation of PDZ proteins [13, 14].

Discs Large 1 (DLG1) is one of the first and best-characterized PDZ-containing partners of HPV E6, being targeted by almost all E6 proteins from the high-risk HPV types [15, 16]. DLG1, together with the Lethal giant larvae and Scribble proteins, form the conserved Scrib polarity complex. In epithelial cells, DLG1 localizes to the adherens junctions in association with cytoskeleton components, where it coordinates junction formation and stability, contributing to the maintenance of apico-basal polarity as well as participating in transduction signals that control cell proliferation [12, 17, 18]. Furthermore, DLG1 expression was shown to be low or even absent in the later stages of tumour development in different cancers, which strongly suggests that this cellular protein may have oncosuppressor functions [11]. Initially, it was demonstrated that over-expression of high-risk HPV E6 protein can stimulate DLG1 degradation through the ubiquitinylation-proteasomal system [10, 19]. This finding was corroborated by the fact that DLG1 expression is very low in the later stages of cervical cancer development [20, 21], suggesting a role for DLG1 targeting in HPV-induced cell transformation. However, subsequent studies showed significant levels of DLG1 in HPV-positive cervical cancer cell lines, indicating that E6-mediated degradation of DLG1 is incomplete [22]. Moreover, in some squamous intraepithelial precursor lesions (SIL), DLG1 levels are increased in comparison with normal epithelium, although with notable alterations in its cellular distribution [20, 21]. In addition, in organotypic raft cultures expressing HPV-18 E6 (18E6) and E7 (18E7) oncoproteins, high levels and mislocalized expression of DLG1 were observed, in concordance with the data for SIL biopsies [13].

These findings suggest that changes in DLG1 expression could have an impact in HPV pathogenesis, since DLG1 functions are strictly dependent on its correct subcellular distribution [23, 24]. They also indicate that the effects of the HPV-DLG1 association are complex and that their final outcome depends on the biological context during tumour development and in the joint expression of both HPV oncoproteins.

In line with the above, we recently reported that the presence of both HPV-18 oncoproteins in epithelial cells produces a striking mislocalization of DLG1 from the cell borders to the cytoplasm. Moreover, the expression of 18E7 increases DLG1 protein levels, probably by contributing to its stabilization and/or by preventing E6-mediated DLG1 degradation. This suggests that 18E7 protein, when co-expressed with E6, may also have a role in the regulation of DLG1 levels, which would be consistent with the concept that both proteins are complementary in many viral activities [14].

We wanted to pursue these findings to search for possible mechanisms regulating the effects of E7 on DLG1 expression. A key regulatory element of E7 activity is its phosphorylation by Casein Kinase II (CKII) which increases the interaction of E7 with its cellular partners and may thus control different signalling mechanisms [25,26,27,28]. In line with this, the E7 phosphorylation by CKII was shown to be crucial for 18E7 activities in maintaining the transformed phenotype [28]. Hence, it resulted interesting to investigate if this post-translational modification was also involved in the E7 effect over DLG1 expression.

Remarkably, human Scribble protein (hScrib), another PDZ-containing protein of the Scrib polarity complex, is likewise a target of high-risk HPV E6 [29]. While being the main target of HPV-16 E6 (16E6) protein for ubiquitin-mediated degradation, it has also been shown to be degraded to a lesser extent by 18E6 [30, 31]. As for DLG1, hScrib levels were found to be increased and mislocalized in some SIL samples, compared with normal tissues [32]. Taking this in mind we also wanted to investigate potentially common mechanisms that regulate diverse PDZ targets during HPV infection and malignant progression.

In summary, in this report we show that E7 phosphorylation by CKII plays an essential role in the ability of this viral protein to regulate the pattern of expression of both DLG1 and hScrib and, moreover, this E7 activity is conserved among different high-risk HPV types. This study provides new information on HPV oncoprotein activities regarding the regulation of PDZ polarity proteins, further indicating their implication in the HPV life cycle and the associated pathogenesis.

Methods

Cell culture and transfection

The epithelial cells used were the Human Embryonic Kidney 293 (HEK293, ATCC #CRL-1573), C4-1 (ATCC CRL-1594) and two mutant cell lines (B8 and A15) with a double amino acid substitution S32A/S34A within the CKII phospho-acceptor site of HPV18E7, generated through genome editing, as described by Basukala et al. [28]. B8 and A15 cells were provided by the Tumour Virology Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy, where they were created. All cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, NY, USA), 300 μg/ml glutamine and 100U/ml penicillin–streptomycin. The cultures were maintained at 37 °C, in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

For cell transfection, the calcium phosphate precipitation method was used, as previously described [10]. Briefly, cells were seeded in appropriate dishes at 50–60% confluence. After 24 h, the transfection solution was prepared with the respective DNA in 100 µl Tris–EDTA (TE) buffer, 11.2 µl 2.5 M CaCl2 and 100 µl 2 × HBS, pH 7.12 (50 mM Hepes pH 7, 280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4.7H2O). After gentle mixing followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature, the transfection mixture was added to the desired plate.

Plasmids

The DNA sequence coding for 18E6 oncoprotein was cloned into pseyfp2-c1 (expression plasmid encoding the super enhanced yellow fluorescent protein 2) and pmTurq1-c2 (encoding an enhanced version of the cyan fluorescent protein) vectors to obtain pseyfp2-18E6 and pmTurq2-18E6. The DNA sequence coding for 16E6 was cloned into pegfp-c1 (expression plasmid encoding the enhanced green fluorescent protein) resulting in pegfp-16E6. The DNA sequence coding for 18E7 oncoprotein was cloned into pegfp-c1 and pLPC-mCherry (expression plasmid encoding the red fluorescent protein) vectors resulting in pegfp-18E7 and pLPC-Cherry-18E7, respectively. The C-terminal FLAG-tagged 18E7 and HPV-16 E7 (16E7) wild type or mutant CMV plasmids were previously described [28].

The DNA sequence coding for hScrib was cloned into HA-tagged pCDNA-3 plasmid, resulting in pCDNA-HA-Scrib. The pegfp-DLG1 and pmTurq2-DLG1 vectors were previously described [14, 33]. A plasmid encoding β-galactoside (β-gal) protein was included in all transfections as a control of equal transfection efficiency.

Antibodies

Antibodies used were mouse monoclonal anti-HA (12CA5, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (B-2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-DLG1 (2D11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-Scrib (C-6, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG-M2-peroxidase (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-18E6 (BF7, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-CDK2 (D12, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti- α tubulin (GTU-88, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and mouse monoclonal anti- β-Gal (Promega, Madison, USA). Secondary anti-rabbit HRP and anti-mouse HRP antibodies were obtained from Dako.

Cell protein extracts and Western blot

Whole-cell extracts were prepared by resuspending cells directly in SDS-sample buffer (125 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue and 10% b-mercaptoethanol). When specified, cells were treated with 2.5 μM Cysteine Kinase II (CK II) inhibitor (Silmitasertib, CX-4945, MedChem) for 4 h prior to protein extraction.

Equal amounts of protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto 0.22 µm nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h and probed with the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. The blots were then developed using the ECL Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Blots were cut prior to hybridisation with the indicated antibodies, hence, the original images of full-length membranes cannot be provided. The original unprocessed used blots with visible membrane edges have been included in Fig. S3 to Fig. S9. The relevant bands showed in the manuscript figures are indicated by a dashed lined rectangle.

Protein band intensities were quantified using the FIJI software [34]. In order to test the statistical significance of protein variations ANOVA-test and multivariate Tukey analysis were performed.

Fluorescence microscopy and immunofluorescence

HEK293 cells were grown on glass coverslips (350,000 cells/35 mm diameter dish), transfected for 24 h. When specified, cells were treated with 2.5 μM Cysteine Kinase II (CK II) inhibitor (Silmitasertib, CX-4945, MedChem) for 4 h prior to fixing. The cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min at room temperature.

Cell cultures overexpressing fluorescent fusion proteins were directly mounted with SlowFade reagent (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Fluorescence microscopy images were collected with a Carl Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope following the sequential acquisition mode (Carl Zeiss, Germany). A 63 × NA 1.4 plan apochromat oil immersion objective was employed. The quantification analysis of DLG1 levels in cells borders was performed using the FIJI v1.52 software [34], following a previously described algorithm. Briefly, the segmentation plugin “Trainable Weka Segmentation v3.2.34”, a classification tool based on machine learning [35], was applied on each image to create a template that would automatically find the labelled cellular proteins associated to the cell borders by providing examples of membrane and cytoplasmic fluorescence signal. Each segmented image was converted into a binary mask and multiplied by the corresponding original image to obtain the final “classified image”. Therefore, these images conserved the original value of the pixels associated with the border fluorescence signal, while assign a value of 0 to each pixel associated with the cytoplasm. In order to process automatically the input fluorescence images, an “in-house” macro IJM code was written. To assess the fluorescence intensity in individual cells, regions of interest (ROIs) were manually outlined along cell perimeters to include the full membrane width and thickness using the original images.

On each original and classified image, DLG1 fluorescence was quantified as the sum of pixel intensities, expressed as raw integrated density (RawIntDen) per ROI. Therefore, the RawIntDen and the area of each ROI for the total pixels (original image) and only for the membrane pixels (classified image) were measured.

In order to automatically analyze the fluorescence images with high reproducibility and precision, an in-house macro code was written in “Image J Macro” (IJM) language. Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's comparisons (p value < 0.01) was performed.

Results

Mutation of the HPV-18 E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site prevents the E7-mediated stabilization of DLG1

In order to clarify the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the expression of DLG1 PDZ-protein by HPV oncoproteins, we first investigated the relevance of the CKII-dependent E7’s phospho-acceptor site.

For this, we analysed DLG1 levels in the cervical carcinoma C4-1 cells, which bear a single copy of the HPV-18 genome, and in two derived cell lines (B8 and A15), that were generated by genome editing, introducing mutations into the 18E7 CKII site which prevent its phosphorylation [28]. DLG1 abundance was ascertained by Western blot using total protein extracts from C4-1 and the two mutant derivative lines. As can be seen in Fig. 1A, DLG1 levels in C4-1 cells are significantly higher than in either B8 or A15 cells. As the genetic difference between these cell lines lies only in the E7 CKII site, these results point towards the possibility that only the wild type E7 protein expressed in C4-1 cells can rescue DLG1 from E6-mediated degradation, as previously reported [14]. Since mutations preventing E7 phosphorylation by CKII can circumvent this rescue, altogether these data suggest the relevance of this site in DLG1 stabilization by E7.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mutation of the HPV-18 E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site prevents the stabilization of DLG1. A C4-1 wild type cells and the CKII HPV-18 E7 phospho-acceptor mutant derivative (C4-1 B8 and C4-1 A15) cells were grown for 24 h and whole protein extracts were analysed by Western Blot (Left panel). The endogenous expression of DLG1 was ascertained using the specific anti-DLG1 antibody. α-tubulin was used as loading control. Right panel, densitometry analysis of western blots for DLG1 expression, normalised for α-tubulin levels in each corresponding different condition (mean ± SD, n = 3). Asterisks denote significant differences determined by ANOVA test (**p < 0.05). B HEK293 epithelial cells were transiently transfected with 5 µg of pseyfp2-18 E6, 5 µg of wild type or 5 µg of mutant pCMV-Flag-18 E7 and 1 µg of pmTurq2-DLG1 plasmid. Cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection and the expression of fusion proteins was assessed by Western Blot (Left panel) using an anti-Flag (wild type and mutant 18E7), anti-18E6 and anti-GFP, which recognizes mTurq2-DLG1. β-Galactoside levels were used as transfection control. For the assessment of the E7-Flag proteins two images with different degree of exposition are shown for a better appreciation. Right panel, densitometry analysis of western blots for DLG1 expression for equal β-galactoside levels in each corresponding different condition (mean ± SD, n = 3). Asterisks denote significant difference determined by ANOVA test and a Multiple Comparisons Tukey´s test (***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.0005) and “ns” indicates no significant changes. Original blots are presented in the Fig. S3 and Fig. S4

Full size image

To further investigate these findings, we performed transient transfection experiments. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with plasmids expressing DLG1, 18E6 and wild type or CKII mutant 18E7, as indicated in Fig. 1B. After 24 h, cells were harvested and the levels of DLG1 were ascertained by Western blot. The results indicate that, as expected, the levels of DLG1 are greatly reduced in the presence of 18E6, as a result of its E6-mediated degradation [10]. However, DLG1 levels are not diminished in the presence of wild type E7 protein, even when E6 is expressed, in agreement with our previous studies [13, 14]. Remarkably, no rescue of DLG1 levels was observed in the presence of the CKII E7 mutant (Fig. 1B), in line with the data shown in Fig. 1A. Moreover, as we reported [14], wild type E7 alone can increase DLG1 levels, even in the absence of E6; nevertheless, no significant changes in DLG1 abundance were detected when expressing the mutant version of E7 in the absence of E6 (Fig. 1B). Together, these results suggest that the regulation of DLG1 abundance by E7 depends on the presence of an intact CKII phospho-acceptor site in the viral protein.

The CKII phosphorylation of 18E7 is involved in stabilizing DLG1

Next, we wanted to specifically analyze if CKII phosphorylation of 18E7 is required for E7's regulation of DLG1 levels. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with plasmids expressing DLG1, 18E6 and wild type or mutant 18E7, and then treated with the specific CKII inhibitor CX-4945 [36] for four hours before protein extraction. The levels of DLG1 were ascertained by Western blot both for inhibitor-treated and untreated (control) cells and the results are shown in Fig. 2. Interestingly, the addition of CKII inhibitor abolishes the ability of wild type E7 to significantly increase the amount of DLG1. Moreover, in cells co-transfected with E6 and wild type E7, CX-4945 treatment reduces DLG1 to levels similar to those seen for cells co-transfected with CKII E7 mutant, indicating that the specific phosphorylation inhibitor also prevents the E7-mediated rescue of DLG1 from E6 degradation (Fig. 2, right panel). These observations suggest than an active CKII-mediated phosphorylation of HPV E7 is required for the stabilization of DLG1 protein.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phosphorylation of 18E7 by CKII is required for stabilization of DLG1 levels. HEK293 cells were transfected with 1 μg of pmTurq2-DLG1, 5 μg of pseyfp-18E6 and/or 5 μg of wild type or mutant pCMV-Flag-18 E7, as indicated. Fusion proteins were assessed by western blot 24 hs post transfection (Upper panel) using an anti-Flag (E7), anti-18E6 and anti-GFP, which recognizes mTurq2-DLG1. β-Galactoside levels were used as transfection control. When indicated, CX-4945 CKII inhibitor was added to the cells 4 h before harvesting. Images with different exposure levels area shown in Fig. S5. Bottom panel, densitometry analysis of DLG1 levels normalized to β-Galactoside expression. Asterisks denote the significant difference between conditions tested by ANOVA test and a Multiple Comparison Tukey´s test (***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.0005) and “ns” indicates no significant changes. The results are representative of three independent experiments. Original blots are presented in Fig. S5

Full size image

Furthermore, DLG1 expression was previously shown to change during the cell cycle [37] and one of the major functions of E7 is precisely the stimulation of cell cycle progression to S phase in a way most likely dependent on CKII phosphorylation [38, 39]. In order to evaluate whether this E7 activity could be involved in changing DLG1 expression we assessed the expression of the cell cycle-dependent kinase -2 (CDK-2), which was also shown to phosphorylate and stabilize DLG1 [37]. As can be seen in Fig. S1 A (uncropped Fig. S8), treatment with CKII inhibitor induces a reduction in both DLG1 and CDK-2 levels in the HPV-positive C4-1 cells and, furthermore, the expression of wild type 18E7 but not of the CKII mutant 18E7 significantly increases the levels of this cell cycle kinase (Fig. S1 B, uncropped Fig. S9). Altogether, these results suggest that the expression of E7 may induce CDK-2, in a CKII dependent manner, which next contributes stabilizing DLG1 in the presence of the HPV oncoproteins.

The phosphorylation of 18E7 by CKII induces subcellular redistribution of DLG1

To further investigate the contribution of the 18E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site in the regulation of DLG1 expression, we evaluated by confocal fluorescence microscopy assays the cellular localization of this PDZ polarity protein in the presence of 18E6 and the wild type or CKII-mutant 18E7, as indicated in Fig. 3A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of the effect of CKII phosphorylation upon DLG1 subcellular localization. A An intact E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site is required for DLG1 misdistribution in the presence of both HPV oncoproteins. Upper panel, the vector encoding egfp-DLG1 (1.5 μg) was transfected into HEK293 cells and DLG1 localization was analyzed by confocal microscopy (yellow arrow). Middle and bottom panel, the vector encoding mTurq2-18E6 (cyan 0.75 μg), egfp-DLG1 (green 0.75 μg) and wild type or mutant Cherry-18E7 (red 0.75 μg) were co-transfected into HEK293 cells and the localization of each fusion protein was analyzed by confocal microscopy after 24 post transfection, white and yellow arrows indicate DLG1 subcellular localization. B Effect of specific CKII inhibitor CX-4549 upon DLG1 localization. HEK293 cells were transfected with pegfp-DLG1 (green 1.5 μg), pmTurq2-18E6 (cyan 0.75 μg) and wild type pCherry-18 E7 (red 0.75 μg) for 24 hs. CX-4945 CKII inhibitor was added to the cells 4 h before fixing, as indicated (+ CX-4945). The bar graph shows the quantification of the DLG1 levels at cell borders in the presence or absence of the inhibitor CX-4945, at least 80 cells were analyzed per condition. All scale bars represent 10 μm. The results are representative of at least 3 independent experiments

Full size image

First, the subcellular distribution of DLG1 was examined by transfecting the corresponding pegpf-DLG1 (green) expression vector into HEK293 cells and was found to be primarily located at the cell borders (Fig. 3A, upper panel, yellow arrow), as previously established [40]. Alternatively, HEK293 cells were further co-transfected with the expression vectors pegpf-DLG1 (green), pmTurq-18E6 (cyan) and pLPC-Cherry-wild type or mutant 18E7 (red), using high levels of ectopic DLG1 in order to overcome the E6-mediated degradation and therefore enabling the analysis of protein localization [14]. DLG1 redistribution to the cytoplasmic region in the presence of both 18E6 and wild type 18E7 was observed (Fig. 3A, middle panels, white arrow) as we have previously demonstrated [14]. The control patterns of DLG1 distribution when this protein is independently co-expressed with E6 or E7 is provided in Fig. S2. Also as expected, DLG1 over expression promotes the redistributions of E6 from the nucleus, without a marked mislocalization of DLG1. In the presence of E7, which regularly localizes both in nucleus and cytoplasm, only a minor change in DLG1 expression was observed, in agreement with our previous publication [14] and endorsing the issue that both viral proteins are required for mislocalizing DLG1. However, when the CKII mutant 18E7 was expressed instead of the wild type viral protein, DLG1 protein was retained at the cell–cell contacts (Fig. 3A, bottom panel, yellow arrow), indicating a role for the CKII-dependent E7 phosphorylation in DLG1 regulation.

To further investigate the effect of E7 CKII phosphorylation upon the localization of DLG1, we performed transient transfection experiments as described above, but in the presence of CX-4945, a CKII inhibitor. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with the fluorescent protein vectors indicated in Fig. 3B and were incubated with or without CX-4945 for four hours. The cells were then fixed and the subcellular localization of each protein was determined by confocal microscopy. Again, in the absence of the inhibitor, we detected the redistribution of DLG1 from the cell borders to the cytoplasm when E6 and wild type E7 are co-expressed (Fig. 3B, upper panel, white arrow). However, DLG1 mislocalization is much less evident when the transfected cells are treated with CX-4945, since a notable amount of DLG1 protein is retained at the cell contacts (Fig. 3B, bottom panel, yellow arrows). In order to determine the proportion of mislocalized DLG1 in both conditions, we carried out a quantitative analysis using the FIJI v1.52 software. Figure 3B (right panel) shows DLG1 fluorescence intensity at the cell borders in each experimental setting and the results indicate that, in the presence of CKII inhibitor, DLG1 levels at the cell-to-cell contacts are significantly higher than in the control.

All together, these data indicate that an intact phospho-acceptor site on 18E7 and the active CKII phosphorylation of 18E7 are required for the observed redistribution of the PDZ protein in the presence of both E6 and E7 HPV oncoproteins.

HPV E7 protein regulates the expression of other HPV E6 PDZ targets

Next, we wanted to extend our analysis to other PDZ proteins known to be targets of high-risk HPV E6 oncoproteins, such as hScrib [29]. Hence, we first evaluated whether the mutations in the CKII phosphorylation site of 18E7 could affect the hScrib protein levels. For this, we analysed by Western blot the C4-1 parental cells and the mutated cell lines (B8 and A15), previously described (this report and [28]). Interestingly, as shown in Fig. 4A, both 18E7 mutant cell lines have lower levels of hScrib than the wild type cell line. These data, similar to our previous results on DLG1, indicate a role for 18E7 in the rescue of hScrib from E6 degradation, while suggesting that this would depend on its phosphorylation by CKII.

Fig. 4
figure 4

HPV E7 can stabilize the different PDZ targets of E6 and this activity is conserved between the E7 proteins from several high-risk HPVs. A C4-1 wild type cells and the CKII HPV-18 E7 mutated cell lines (C4-1 B8 and C4-1 A15) were grown for 24 h and then whole protein extracts were analysed by Western Blot (Left panel). The endogenous expression of hScrib was then studied using a specific mouse-anti-Scrib antibody. Original blots are presented in Fig. S6. Right panel, densitometry analysis of Western blots for hScrib expression for equivalent α-tubulin levels in each corresponding different condition (mean ± SD, n = 3). Asterisks denote significant difference determined by ANOVA test (*p < 0.05). B HEK293 epithelial cells were transiently transfected with 2.5 µg of pegfp-16 E6, 2.5 µg of wild type or mutant pCMV-Flag-16 E7 and 0.5 µg of pcDNA-HA-Scrib plasmid. Cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection and the expression of fusion proteins was assessed by Western Blot (Left panel) using an anti-Flag (E7), anti-GFP (E6) and anti-HA (hScrib). β-Galactoside levels were used as transfection control. Images with different exposure levels and original blots are presented in Fig. S7. Right panel, densitometry analysis of western blots for hScrib expression for equal β-galactoside levels in each corresponding different condition (mean ± SD, n = 3). Asterisks denote significant difference determined by ANOVA test and a Multiple Comparisons Tukey´s test (**p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005) and “ns” indicates no significant changes

Full size image

To further investigate these findings, and considering that the PDZ protein hScrib is preferentially targeted by 16E6, we performed a series of transient transfection experiments using HPV-16 proteins. HEK293 cells were co-transfected as indicated in Fig. 4B and harvested after 24 h to ascertain the levels of hScrib by Western blot. As expected, the abundance of hScrib was greatly reduced in the presence of 16E6, most likely due to its E6-mediated degradation [29]. However, hScrib levels were rescued by the co-expression of wild type, but not CKII mutant, HPV-16 E7 protein (Fig. 4B). Moreover, as was demonstrated for 18E7 and DLG1, we observed that wild type 16E7 can increase the expression of hScrib, even in the absence of E6. Conversely, the CKII mutant of 16E7 did not induce any statistically significant changes in hScrib abundance (Fig. 4B). Overall, these results indicate the stabilization of another PDZ target, hScrib, by CKII-phosphorylated 16E7.

Discussion

Although HPV infections are an important issue for public health, many of the mechanisms involved in the viral life cycle and pathogenesis are elusive. Important questions remain about the complex interplay between key cellular target proteins and the E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins, whose co-expression is required to create an environment compatible with the viral life cycle and which, concomitantly, can drive malignant progression. With no known enzymatic activities, these viral proteins carry out their actions by perturbing a plethora of different cellular factors, including several PDZ polarity proteins ([6] for a review). In this report we provide new insights on the regulation of PDZ proteins by HPV.

Despite the well-known joint action of E6 and E7, it is not always clear when these oncoproteins perform cooperatively or, instead, when they have opposed outcomes; and this is also true for their effect on PDZ proteins. While high-risk HPV E6's detrimental impact on several of these cellular targets is well established [8, 41], much less is understood about the role of E7 oncoproteins in their regulation. In this regard, we have recently reported that the combined expression of both HPV-18 major oncoproteins promotes not only the upregulation, but also the subcellular redistribution, of the PDZ cellular protein DLG1 [13, 14]. Moreover, this expression pattern was the same as that observed in HPV-associated cervical lesions, where the mislocalization of DLG1 could have acquired oncogenic traits, contributing to cancer [20, 21].

In this study we have begun to address the mechanisms behind these observations. We here demonstrate the implications of a key modification of E7: its main CKII-dependent phosphorylation. First, using HPV-18-positive cervical cancer cells, edited in the CKII phospho-acceptor site of E7, we found that the genetic mutation of this site is linked to less abundant endogenous DLG1. Moreover, by evaluating the transient expression of this PDZ protein in the presence of wild-type E7 or E7 mutated to be CKII phosphorylation-resistant, individually or together with 18E6, we find that the integrity of the CKII phospho-acceptor site in E7 is required for DLG1 stabilization. It is important to emphasize that, while E7 is known to be regulated by several different post-translational events ([42] for a review), the CKII-mediated phosphorylation of 16E7 has been shown to be crucial for the viral life cycle [43], most likely by favouring the recognition of important cellular targets, including pRb, the pocket protein p130 and the TATA box binding protein (TBP) [39, 44, 45]. In contrast to these direct substrates, HPV-E7 is unable to bind to PDZ-containing proteins [10, 14]. Thus, the impact of E7 on DLG1 levels would be almost certainly due to indirect mechanisms. Based on our current data, we propose that E7's phosphorylation by CKII is a crucial part of the pathways involved. Interestingly, numerous key roles have been established for this phosphorylation in modulating E7's transforming potential [25, 46, 47] and its activities that favour cellular proliferation and invasiveness [28]. In this regard, even though DLG1 was initially identified as a tumour suppressor, it has been paradoxically shown to have pro-oncogenic functions when mislocalized [24, 48] and has been observed to accumulate in the cytoplasm of cancer cells from various different tumours [11, 12]. Hence, in order to favour virus cycle progression, it appears that phosphorylated E7 may promote the accumulation of DLG1, to promote cell growth and proliferation. In line with this, it is important to consider that the cell lines bearing E7 variants unfitted for CKII-mediated phosphorylation were previously shown to present a deficiency in growth rate [28].

It is also worth noting that when E7 is involved in the induction of S-phase through a CKII-dependent mechanism [38, 39, 49], several other relevant cellular kinases are known to be triggered or transcriptionally activated during this process. DLG1 has been shown to be regulated by a complex net of cellular kinases, including the cell cycle regulators CDK-1 and CDK-2 [37, 50]. DLG1 cell distribution and stability are modulated through changes in its phosphorylation status, and specifically some phosphorylated forms of DLG1 have been shown to be less prone to degradation, most likely by being less susceptible to ubiquitination [37]. We observed that CDK-2 levels are reduced by CKII inhibitors and on the other hand, are increased in the presence of wild type 18E7. These data point towards a probable link between cellular kinases expressed during the cell cycle progression activated by E7, in a CKII-dependent way, and more stable forms of DLG1.

Overall, our present results show that when expressing both main HPV oncoproteins, as occurs during the HPV life-cycle, and in HPV-induced tumourigenesis, not only does 18E7 facilitate the cytoplasmic accumulation of DLG1, but also that this effect is mediated by E7 CKII-dependent phosphorylation. Interestingly, an 16E7 variant with an additional CKII-dependent phosphorylation site has been shown to exert increased transforming activity [45], highlighting the relevance of phosphorylation by this kinase in HPV-associated lesions. However, their precise consequences in the viral life cycle or during the different phases towards malignant progression remain to be elucidated. Although CKII is not considered an oncoprotein, studies have shown that its dysregulation can contribute to its oncogenic potential [47, 51]. Moreover, high CKII levels are associated with cell proliferation: it has been found to be greatly increased during malignant transformation in a variety of tumours, raising the possibility of its having a key role in the tumoural phenotype [47, 51,52,53,54]. Targeting CKII with specific inhibitors has shown considerable therapeutic potential, and some inhibitors are currently in clinical trials with apparently promising outcomes [42, 55,56,57]. Indeed, our results using one of these compounds, the CX-4945 molecule, show that selective inhibition of CKII can block 18E7's effect on DLG1, with respect both to its abundance and its subcellular distribution. Thus, we demonstrate that CKII-dependent E7 phosphorylation modulates the cellular levels of DLG1, reinforcing the relevance of HPV E7 modification by CKII to the functionality of this oncogenic viral protein.

Furthermore, our findings indicate that the effects of 18E7 on DLG1 may be common to other polarity proteins, since similar effects are seen with hScrib [58]. hScrib expression is regulated by a complex interplay of different postransductional modifications and, importantly, its overexpression and accumulation in the cytoplasm is associated with malignant progression in various tumours, including cervical cancer [59, 60]. Our data point towards E7 contributing to the stabilization of hScrib and, moreover, put forward that this regulation depends on CKII. In addition, given that 16E7 also appears to function similarly to 18E7, our results suggest that this mechanism is conserved among different high-risk HPVs [30, 31].

Thus, the efficient phosphorylation of E7 by CKII could have direct consequences upon its partner recognition and, given the multiplicity and variety of E7 targets, numerous signalling pathways may be controlled by this phosphorylation. These pathways then might regulate PDZ protein expression to favour the accumulation of the subcellular fractions most resistant to E6-mediated degradation. It is important to remark that both DLG1 and hScrib are highly expressed in cervical low-grade SILs (LSILs), with a distribution pattern similar to that described here, when HPV E6 and phospho-E7 are co-expressed. In these lesions HPVs are replication-competent, therefore, it can be speculated that differential expression of the PDZ proteins could be relevant for the virus life cycle. However, we have previously shown that those LSILs with the highest DLG1 levels are prone to progress to more severe lesions, compared with those LSILs with lower DLG1 abundance. As progression to high-grade lesions is detrimental to virus replication, there may be a tight balance between the antagonistic activities of HPV E6 and E7 regarding the regulation of the PDZ proteins, an interesting issue that deserves further investigation. Although the exact downstream effects of E7's CKII phosphorylation remain to be unravelled, we have started to elucidate the events involved in the E7-dependent modulation of different PDZ polarity targets, unveiling a regulatory process conserved among different high-risk HPVs.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the co-expression of both E6 and E7 HPV oncoproteins induced changes in the expression of the DLG1 and hScrib PDZ proteins and, interestingly, this effect depends on the phosphorylation of E7 by CKII. This finding underlines a novel role for CKII in regulating E7 activities linked to the misexpression of key polarity proteins. Remarkably, this E7 activity is conserved among different high-risk HPV types suggesting common strategies conducting to loss of cell polarity during HPV carcinogenesis. This study contributes to explain potential mechanisms behind the observed differential expression of these PDZ proteins during the malignant progression associated to the viral infection. Nevertheless, future research is still needed to completely understand how, when and why the HPV oncoproteins target the PDZ proteins during the virus life cycle and pathogenesis.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data supporting our findings can be found in Fig. S3 to Fig. S9 or can be requested to the authors.

Abbreviations

CDK-2:

Cyclin dependent kinases 2

CKII:

Casein kinase II

DLG1:

Human disc large 1

EGFP:

Enhanced green fluorescent protein

HA:

Influenza virus hemagglutinin epitope

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

hScrib:

Human scribble protein

HSIL:

High-grade SIL

LSIL:

Low-grade SIL

mCherry:

Cherry fluorescent protein

mTurq2:

Enhanced version of cyan fluorescent protein

PBM:

PDZ-binding motif

PDZ:

PSD-95/DLG1/ZO -1 domains

seyfp2:

Super enhanced yellow fluorescent protein

SIL:

Squamous Intraepithelial precursor Lesions

References

  1. zurHausen H. Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers - a brief historical account. Virology. 2009;384(2):260–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Doorbar J, Quint W, Banks L, Bravo IG, Stoler M, Broker TR, et al. The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine. 2012;30(SUPPL.5):F55-70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomaić V. Functional roles of E6 and E7 oncoproteins in HPV-induced malignancies at diverse anatomical sites. Cancers (Basel). 2016;8(10):95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suarez I, Trave G. Structural insights in multifunctional papillomavirus oncoproteins. Viruses. 2018;10(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeo-Teh NSL, Ito Y, Jha S. High-risk human papillomaviral oncogenes E6 and E7 target key cellular pathways to achieve oncogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(6):1706.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vats A, Trejo-Cerro O, Thomas M, Banks L. Human papillomavirus E6 and E7: What remains? Tumour Virus Res. 2021;11: 200213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoppe-Seyler K, Bossler F, Braun JA, Herrmann AL, Hoppe-Seyler F. The HPV E6/E7 Oncogenes: Key Factors for Viral Carcinogenesis and Therapeutic Targets. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(2):158–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas M, Myers MP, Massimi P, Guarnaccia C, Banks L. Analysis of Multiple HPV E6 PDZ Interactions Defines Type-Specific PDZ Fingerprints That Predict Oncogenic Potential. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(8):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas M, Banks L. The biology of papillomavirus PDZ associations: what do they offer papillomaviruses? Curr Opin Virol. 2021;51:119–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardiol D, Kühne C, Glaunsinger B, Lee SS, Javier R, Banks L. Oncogenic human papillomavirus E6 proteins target the discs large tumour suppressor for proteasome mediated degradation. Oncogene. 1999;18(40):5487–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Facciuto F, Cavatorta AL, Valdano MB, Marziali F, Gardiol D. Differential expression of PDZ domain-containing proteins in human diseases - Challenging topics and novel issues. FEBS J. 2012;279(19):3538–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marziali F, Dizanzo MP, Cavatorta AL, Gardiol D. Differential expression of DLG1 as a common trait in different human diseases: An encouraging issue in molecular pathology. Biol Chem. 2019;400(6):699–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. BugnonValdano M, Cavatorta AL, Morale MG, Marziali F, de Souza LV, Steenbergen RDM, et al. Disc large 1 expression is altered by human papillomavirus E6/E7 proteins in organotypic cultures of human keratinocytes. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(2):453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dizanzo MP, Marziali F, Brunet Avalos C, BugnonValdano M, Leiva S, Cavatorta AL, et al. HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperatively alter the expression of Disc Large 1 polarity protein in epithelial cells. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(293):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Doorslaer K, DeSalle R, Einstein MH, Burk RD. Degradation of Human PDZ-Proteins by Human Alphapapillomaviruses Represents an Evolutionary Adaptation to a Novel Cellular Niche. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(6):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ganti K, Broniarczyk J, Manoubi W, Massimi P, Mittal S, Pim D, et al. The human papillomavirus E6 PDZ binding motif: From life cycle to malignancy. Viruses. 2015;7(7):3530–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sotelo NS, Valiente M, Gil A, Pulido R. A functional network of the tumor suppressors APC, hDlg, and PTEN, that relies on recognition of specific PDZ-domains. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(8):2661–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki T, Ohsugi Y, Uchida-Toita M, Akiyama T, Yoshida M. Tax oncoprotein of HTLV-1 binds to the human homologue of Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein, hDLG, and perturbs its function in cell growth control. Oncogene. 1999;18(44):5967–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardiol D, Galizzi S, Banks L. Mutational analysis of the discs large tumour suppressor identifies domains responsible for human papillomavirus type 18 E6-mediated degradation. J Gen Virol. 2002;83(2):283–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavatorta AL, Fumero G, Chouhy D, Aguirre R, Nocito AL, Giri AA, et al. Differential expression of the human homologue of Drosophila discs large oncosuppressor in histologic samples from human papilloma virus-associated lesions as a marker for progression to malignancy. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(3):373–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cavatorta AL, Di Gregorio A, BugnonValdano M, Marziali F, Cabral M, Bottai H, et al. DLG1 polarity protein expression associates with the disease progress of low-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions. Exp Mol Pathol. 2017;102(1):65–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krishna Subbaiah V, Massimi P, Boon SS, Myers MP, Sharek L, Garcia-Mata R, et al. The invasive capacity of HPV transformed cells requires the hDlg-dependent enhancement of SGEF/RhoG activity. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(2):1002543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stephens R, Lim K, Portela M, Kvansakul M, Humbert PO, Richardson HE. The Scribble Cell Polarity Module in the Regulation of Cell Signaling in Tissue Development and Tumorigenesis. J Mol Biol. 2018;430(19):3585–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts S, Delury C, Marsh E. The PDZ protein discs-large (DLG): The “Jekyll and Hyde” of the epithelial polarity proteins. FEBS J. 2012;279(19):3549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Firzlaff JM, Lüscher B, Eisenman RN. Negative charge at the casein kinase II phosphorylation site is important for transformation but not for Rb protein binding by the E7 protein of human papillomavirus type 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(12):5187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Massimi P, Banks L. Differential phosphorylation of the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein during the cell cycle. Virology. 2000;276(2):388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Songock WK, Kim S man, Bodily JM. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein as a regulator of transcription. Virus Res. 2017;231:56–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Basukala O, Mittal S, Massimi P, Bestagno M, Banks L. The HPV-18 E7 CKII phospho acceptor site is required for maintaining the transformed phenotype of cervical tumour-derived cells. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(5):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakagawa S, Huibregtse JM. Human Scribble (Vartul) Is Targeted for Ubiquitin-Mediated Degradation by the High-Risk Papillomavirus E6 Proteins and the E6AP Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(21):8244–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas M, Massimi P, Navarro C, Borg JP, Banks L. The hScrib/Dlg apico-basal control complex is differentially targeted by HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 proteins. Oncogene. 2005;24(41):6222–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takizawa S, Nagasaka K, Nakagawa S, Yano T, Nakagawa K, Yasugi T, et al. Human scribble, a novel tumor suppressor identified as a target of high-risk HPV E6 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation, interacts with adenomatous polyposis coli. Genes Cells. 2006;11(4):453–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Seiki T, Nagasaka K, Kranjec C, Kawana K, Maeda D, Nakamura H, et al. HPV-16 impairs the subcellular distribution and levels of expression of protein phosphatase 1γ in cervical malignancy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marziali F, Valdano MB, Avalos CB, Moriena L, Cavatorta AL, Gardiol D. Interference of HTLV-1 tax protein with cell polarity regulators: Defining the subcellular localization of the tax-DLG1 interaction. Viruses. 2017;9(12):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carrera I, Frise E, Verena K, Mark L, Tobias P, et al. Fiji - an open platform for biological image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arganda-Carreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Cardona A, et al. Trainable Weka Segmentation: A machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(15):2424–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Son YH, Song JS, Kim SH, Kim J. Pharmacokinetic characterization of CK2 inhibitor CX-4945. Arch Pharmacal Res. 2013;36(7):840–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Narayan N, Massimi P, Banks L. CDK phosphorylation of the discs large tumour suppressor controls its localisation and stability. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(1):65–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chien WM, Parker JN, Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Broker TR, Chow LT. Casein kinase II phosphorylation of the human papillomavirus-18 E7 protein is critical for promoting S-phase entry. Cell Growth Differ. 2000;11(8):425–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Genovese NJ, Banerjee NS, Broker TR, Chow LT. Casein Kinase II Motif-Dependent Phosphorylation of Human Papillomavirus E7 Protein Promotes p130 Degradation and S-Phase Induction in Differentiated Human Keratinocytes. J Virol. 2008;82:4862–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Roberts S, Calautti E, Vanderweil S, Nguyen HO, Foley A, Baden HP, et al. Changes in localization of human discs large (hDlg) during keratinocyte differentiation is associated with expression of alternatively spliced hDlg variants. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313(12):2521–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Banks L, Pim D, Thomas M. Human tumour viruses and the deregulation of cell polarity in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(12):877–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Basukala O, Sarabia-Vega V, Banks L. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins and post translational modifications: generating multifunctional hubs for overriding cellular homeostasis. Biol Chem. 2019;401(5):585–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bodily JM, Mehta KPM, Cruz L, Meyers C, Laimins LA. The E7 Open Reading Frame Acts in cis and in trans To Mediate Differentiation-Dependent Activities in the Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Life Cycle. J Virol. 2011;85(17):8852–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chemes LB, Sánchez IE, Smal C, De Prat-Gay G. Targeting mechanism of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by a prototypical viral oncoprotein: Structural modularity, intrinsic disorder and phosphorylation of human papillomavirus E7. FEBS J. 2010;277(4):973–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zine El Abidine A, Tomaić V, Bel Haj Rhouma R, Massimi P, Guizani I, Boubaker S, et al. A naturally occurring variant of HPV-16 E7 exerts increased transforming activity through acquisition of an additional phospho-acceptor site. Virology. 2017;500(August 2016):218–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Psyrri A, DeFilippis RA, Edwards APB, Yates KE, Manuelidis L, DiMaio D. Role of the Retinoblastoma Pathway in Senescence Triggered by Repression of the Human Papillomavirus E7 Protein in Cervical Carcinoma Cells. Can Res. 2004;64(9):3079–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hwang DW, So KS, Kim SC, Park KM, Lee YJ, Kim SW, et al. Autophagy Induced by CX-4945, a Casein Kinase 2 Inhibitor, Enhances Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Pancreas. 2017;46(4):575–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kranjec C, Banks L. A Systematic Analysis of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E6 PDZ Substrates Identifies MAGI-1 as a Major Target of HPV Type 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-18 Whose Loss Accompanies Disruption of Tight Junctions. J Virol. 2011;85(4):1757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Massimi P, Pim D, Kühne C, Banks L. Regulation of the human papillomavirus oncoproteins by differential phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;227(1–2):137–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mantovani F, Massimi P, Banks L. Proteasome-mediated regulation of the hDlg tumour suppresor protein. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(23):4285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Trembley JH, Wang G, Unger G, Slaton J, Ahmed K. CK2: A key player in cancer biology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;176(1):100–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Morotti A, Panuzzo C, Crivellaro S, Carrà G, Fava C, Guerrasio A, et al. BCR-ABL inactivates cytosolic PTEN through casein kinase II mediated tail phosphorylation. Cell Cycle. 2015;14(7):973–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hanif IM, Hanif IM, Shazib MA, Ahmad KA, Pervaiz S. Casein Kinase II: An attractive target for anti-cancer drug design. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42(10):1602–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Le Page C, Koumakpayi IH, Lessard L, Saad F, Mes-Masson AM. Independent role of phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and casein kinase II (CK-2) in EGFR and Her-2-mediated constitutive NF-kappaB activation in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2005;65(4):306–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pierre F, O’Brien SE, Haddach M, Bourbon P, Schwaebe MK, Stefan E, et al. Novel potent pyrimido[4,5-c]quinoline inhibitors of protein kinase CK2: SAR and preliminary assessment of their analgesic and anti-viral properties. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21(6):1687–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pierre F, Chua PC, O’Brien SE, Siddiqui-Jain A, Bourbon P, Haddach M, et al. Pre-clinical characterization of CX-4945, a potent and selective small molecule inhibitor of CK2 for the treatment of cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;356(1–2):37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Perea SE, Baladrón I, Valenzuela C, Perera Y. CIGB-300: A peptide-based drug that impairs the Protein Kinase CK2-mediated phosphorylation. Semin Oncol. 2018;45(1–2):58–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Su WH, Mruk DD, Wong EWP, Lui WY, Cheng CY. Polarity protein complex scribble/lgl/dlg and epithelial cell barriers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;763:149–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yoshihara K, Ikenouchi J, Izumi Y, Akashi M, Tsukita S, Furuse M. Phosphorylation state regulates the localization of Scribble at adherens junctions and its association with E-cadherin-catenin complexes. Exp Cell Res. 2011;317(4):413–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wan S, Meyer AS, Weiler SME, Rupp C, Tóth M, Sticht C, et al. Cytoplasmic localization of the cell polarity factor Scribble supports liver tumor formation and tumor cell invasiveness. Hepatology. 2017;777(5):1–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Miranda Thomas and Ana Laura Cavatorta for valuable comments and suggestions on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge to Dolores Campos and Rodrigo Vena for excellent technical support and help with cell culture and confocal laser microscopy and image software, respectively.

Funding

Maria Paula Dizanzo and Marina Bugnon Valdano were supported by fellowships from CONICET. Maria Paula Dizanzo was also supported by a Short-Term Phd Fellowship from ICGEB. LB gratefully acknowledges research support provided by the Associazione Italiana per la ricerca sul Cancro Grant number IG 2019 23572.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Biología Molecular Y Celular de Rosario-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas Y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Suipacha 590. 2000, Rosario, Argentina

    María Paula Dizanzo, Marina Bugnon Valdano & Daniela Gardiol

  2. Tumour Virology Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy

    Om Basukala & Lawrence Banks

Authors
  1. María Paula Dizanzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Bugnon Valdano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Om Basukala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lawrence Banks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniela Gardiol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MPD planned and performed experiments, analysed data and wrote the paper. MBV analysed data, advised on the experiments and wrote de paper. OB advised on experiments and analysed the data. LB designed the study, analysed data and wrote the paper. DG designed the study, analysed data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Gardiol.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. None of the cell lines used need ethics approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

A. CKII inhibitor induces a reduction in DLG1 and CDK-2 levels in HPV-positive cells. Fig. S1. B. HPV-18 E7 protein increases the levels of CDK-2 in a CKII-dependent manner. Fig. S2. Analysis of DLG1 expression in the presence of either E618 or E718. Upper panel. Figure Supplementary 3. UncroppedFigure 1 A. Figure Supplementary 4. Uncropped Figure 1 B. Figure Supplementary 5. Uncropped Figure 2. Figure Supplementary 6. UncroppedFigure  4 A. Figure Supplementary 7. Uncropped Figure 4 B. Figure Supplementary 8. Uncropped Figure Supplementary 1. Figure Supplementary 9. Uncropped Figure Supplementary 1 B.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dizanzo, M.P., Bugnon Valdano, M., Basukala, O. et al. Novel effect of the high risk-HPV E7 CKII phospho-acceptor site on polarity protein expression. BMC Cancer 22, 1015 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10105-5

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us