Skip to main content
Download PDF

The study of direct and indirect effects of radiofrequency ablation on tumor microenvironment in liver tumor animal model

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 663 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Direct and indirect effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on tumor microenvironment of the liver tumor have been noted, which was reported to be related to a variety of tyrosine protein kinase or cytokinetic pathway, but have not been thoroughly investigated and conclusive.

Purpose

To elucidate direct and indirect effects of RFA on tumor microenvironment in the liver tumor model, and to explore the role of the specific inhibitor in tumor growth by targeting the key pathway of RFA.

Materials and methods

One hundred and ten mice with H22 liver tumor were used in animal experiments. Eighty-four mice were randomized into three groups: control, direct RFA and indirect RFA (a block slide was inside the middle of the tumor). The growth rate of the residual tumor after RFA was calculated (n = 8 each group) and the pathologic changes at different time points (6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7d after RFA) were evaluated (n = 5 in each subgroup). After semi-quantitative analysis of the pathological staining, the most significant marker after RFA was selected. Then, the specific inhibitor (PHA) was applied with RFA and the tumor growth and pathological changes were evaluated and compared with RFA alone. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for evaluating the significance of different treatments in the pathological positive rate of specific markers in tumor. The two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the significance of treatment in tumor growth or body weight.

Results

The growth rate of the residual tumor in the direct RFA group was faster than the indirect RFA group (P = 0.026). The pathological analysis showed the expression of HSP70 (73 ± 13% vs 27 ± 9% at 24 h, P < 0.001), SMA (70 ± 18% vs 18 ± 7% at 6 h, P < 0.001) and Ki-67 (51 ± 11% vs 33 ± 14% at 7d, P < 0.001) in the direct RFA group was higher than those in the indirect RFA group after RFA. On the other hand, the expression of c-Met (38 ± 11% vs 28 ± 9% at 24 h, P = 0.01), IL-6 (41 ± 10% vs 25 ± 9% at 24 h, P < 0.001) and HIF-α (48 ± 10% vs 28 ± 8% at 24 h, P < 0.001) in the indirect RFA group was higher than those in the direct RFA group. And the expression of c-Met increased mostly in both direct and indirect RFA group compared to the baseline (53 and 65% at 72 h). Then the specific inhibitor of c-Met-PHA was applied with RFA. The growth rate of the tumor was significantly slower in the RFA + PHA group than the RFA alone group (1112.9 ± 465.6 mm3 vs 2162.7 ± 911.1 mm3 at day 16, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Direct and indirect effects of RFA on tumor microenvironment changed at different time points and resulted in increased residual tumor growth in the animal model. It can be potentially neutralized with specific inhibitor of related pathways, such as tyrosine-protein kinase c-Met.

Peer Review reports

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment used in a wide range of tumors including primary solid tumors and tumor metastasis. Because of its advantages of safety, easy operation, effective and low cost, RFA is now a common clinical therapy for many tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RFA, known as a kind of thermal ablation, eliminate the tumor in situ through frictional heat and heat conduction produced by the ionic agitation to achieve thermal coagulative necrosis [1,2,3]. During ablation, the thermal energy does not only cause hyperthermic injury to the tumor cells, but also affect the tumor microenvironment [4]. After ablation, the electrode tip is surrounded by three zones. The central zone is completely necrosis, the peripheral zone is of sublethal hyperthermia and can be recovered from reversible injury, while the surrounding tissue is not affected by the thermal injury directly [5]. The process of tumor microenvironment changes occurs in at least two ways, through direct and indirect heat mechanisms [6].

It was reported that inflammatory infiltrates occurred in the peripheral zone, which was adjacent to the central coagulation zone due to the heat effect [7,8,9]. And the tumor cells, as well as the destroyed extracellular matrix and tissue components could release pro-inflammatory cytokines and trigger the release of additional cytokines, chemokines and vascular adhesion molecules [10,11,12,13]. So that the normal surrounding tissue could also be affected even though it was not directly heated. Some studies have identified several molecular mechanistic pathways that may contribute to the tumor microenvironment changes after RFA, such as IL-6, HGF/c-Met and VEGF, which were considered relevant to tumor growth, metastasis, and invasion [14, 15]. However, the direct and indirect effects of RFA on the tumor have been noted but not thoroughly investigated. Accordingly, the purpose of our study was to explore the potential mechanism of the heat effects after ablation and evaluate the key cytokinetic to improve the treatment outcome.

Materials and methods

Experimental overview

The study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Peking University, Cancer Hospital) before the start. And H22 hepatoma (ATCC, Manassas, Va) in BALB/C mice (Vital River Experimental Animal Technology, Beijing, China) were used in this study. This research was performed in three phases to systematically investigate the potential heat effects (direct and indirect effects) of RFA on liver tumor and the related adjuvant therapy.

Study design

We performed our experiment by using a well-developed H22 tumor bearing animal model. With the tumor model, we divided the tumor into two parts in the middle with or without a thin block slide set inside. We designed two manners to conduct RFA which would mimic the effect of direct RFA or indirect RFA on tumor microenvironment. In the first manner, the RFA electrode was inserted into one half of the tumor. The ablation was conducted without the block slide between the two halves of the tumor. Thus, the other half of tumor was affected by the direct effect of RFA. In the second manner, the RFA electrode was inserted into one half of tumor. The ablation was conducted with the block slide between the two halves of the tumor. The slide blocked the heat transmission to the other half of the tumor. Thus, the other half of tumor was affected by the indirect effect of RFA. The unablated part of the tumors after RFA in the two manners were evaluated in the following days (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of direct and indirect RFA of liver tumor in the animal model. A Photo of a tumor bearing mouse in the indirect RFA group. B Sketch diagram of direct and indirect effects of RFA on liver tumor. The grey region indicates the tumor necrosis. Red dots and yellow dots indicate the direct and indirect effects of RFA respectively

Full size image

Comparison of tumor growth rates

Twenty-four mice with H22 tumors were used in this phase, and the effect of the two different manners on the growth of the unablated half of the tumor after RFA was analyzed. On the basis of our previous work [16, 17], the average diameter of tumor destruction after RFA was around 7 mm, while the risk of spontaneous necrosis was higher when the tumor was larger than 15 mm. Accordingly, the range of 7–15 mm diameter was selected as an appropriate tumor size for RFA. In this study, the range of 10-14 mm diameter was selected as the appropriate tumor size when we performed RFA treatment. The mice were randomized into the following three groups (n = 8 in each group): (a) control, (b) direct RFA (without the block slide); (c) indirect RFA (with the block slide). The diameter of the residual tumor after RFA of each mouse was measured with caliper every 2 days. The tumor growth curves were calculated and compared among different groups.

Assessment of pathologic findings

A total of sixty mice with H22 tumors were used in this phase and were randomized into the three groups: (a) control, (b) direct RFA, (c) indirect RFA. The mice were sacrificed at different time points after RFA, including 6 h, 24 h,72 h and 7 days for pathological analysis (n = 5 for each subgroup). Tissue was fixed in 10% formalin overnight at 4 °C, embedded in paraffin, and sliced at a thickness of 5 μm. The tissue was stained with hematoxylin eosin for gross pathologic examination. The specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) or immunofluorescence (IF) staining was used to detect the changes of the tumor microenvironment, containing the expression of the following markers, HSP70 (ab181606, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), SMA (ab32575, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), Ki-67 (12202S, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), VEGF (AF469, R&D Systems), CD31 (77,699 T, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), HIF-α (MAB1536-SP, R&D Systems), IL-6 (AF-406-SP, R&D Systems) and c-Met (AF527, R&D Systems).

The positive cells of different markers were analyzed according to IHC/IF staining of tumor specimen at 6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7d after RFA. The expression and distribution of the markers in each specimen were observed under the microscope, and were analyzed blindly to the treatment to eliminate bias. The positive rate of each marker was calculated for five random high-power fields in each slide. The expression of each marker in different time points was semi quantitatively presented by bar graph. We analyzed the quantitative data of pathological results and evaluated the possible target markers that may have the most significant changes after RFA.

Evaluation of the effect of specific inhibitor

In the third phase, we evaluated the role of inhibiting one of the key pathways underlying post ablation tumor response. The effect of an adjuvant small-molecule c-Met receptor inhibitor (PHA-665752, subsequently referred to as PHA; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo) on tumor microenvironment after RFA ablation was studied. Sixteen mice with H22 tumors were used for tumor growth study. In this phase, the range of 8-10 mm diameter was selected as the appropriate tumor size when we performed RFA treatment. The mice were randomized into two groups (n = 8 in each group): (a) RFA alone, (b) PHA + RFA. PHA (0.83 mg/kg, 200 μl each) was injected intraperitoneally every 2 days for four times. RFA was performed 2 h after first injection of PHA. To mimic the residual tumor during ablation of large tumors in clinical practice, about half of the tumor was completely ablated. The diameter of the tumor and the body weight of each mouse was measured every 2 days. Next, 10 mice from the above two groups were sacrificed at 7 days after RFA (24 h after the last injection of PHA) (n = 5 in each group) for pathological analysis. IHC staining was used to compare the changes of the tumor microenvironment after administration of PHA, including Ki-67, CD31, HIF-α and c-Met.

Animal model

For all experiments and procedures, anesthesia was induced by means of intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (45 mg/kg, chemical reagent factory of Foshan, China). Animals were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber. RFA was performed in an established H22 liver adenocarcinoma model in BALB/C mice (female, weighing 18–20 g, aged 6–8 weeks). 0.2 ml of H22 cells (at a density of 1 × 107/ml) suspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 and matrigel (1:1) were injected subcutaneously into the abdominal wall with an 18-gauge needle for each tumor to establish the liver adenocarcinoma model. Animals were monitored every 2 or 3 days to measure tumor growth. Ultrasonography was used to determine solid nonnecrotic tumors before treatment in this study. Mean starting tumor size was similar for all comparative treatment groups at initial treatment. The longitudinal and transverse directions of the tumor were measured with mechanical calipers and the body weight of the mouse was weighed on the electronic balance every 2 days after RFA. The measurement was performed by A-NJ and KZ, with 4 and 3 years of experience in animal experiments, respectively and verified by WY, with 12 years of experience in animal experiments, who was blinded to the treatment group. Tumor volume was calculated as D*d2*0.5, where D and d were the two diameters of the tumor measured above.

RFA procedure

In the animal experiments, the 17-gauge monopolar electrode (ACT1507 electrode; Valleylab, Tyco Healthcare) and the 480-kHz RFA generator (Model CC-1-220; Valleylab, Tyco Healthcare, USA) were used during RFA. The animal was shaved off on the back and applied electrolytic contact gel and then placed on the conventional metallic grounding pad (Cosman Medical, Inc. USA) to complete the RFA circuit. About 0.7 cm of the electrode tip was placed at the center of the target tumor part first and the RFA generator was set to the tip temperature at 65 ± 2 °C and applied for 5 min. Here, we chose temperature 65 °C as the ablation parameter because the temperature point was the highest level for mice can tolerate during RFA treatment.

IHC/IF staining

The paraffin tissue sections were firstly soaked in xylene to deplete paraffin, rinsed in ethanol to deplete xylene and soaked in hydrogen peroxide solution to reduce endogenous peroxidase activity. Then, antigen retrieval was performed by placing slides in a container and heated (97 °C) to enhance the accessibility of antibody to antigen for 10 minutes. After the slides were rinsed with PBS, they were blocked in goat serum to reduce nonspecific binding of the antibody. The blocked tissue slides were incubated with primary antibodies overnight. After washed with PBS, they were incubated with species matched secondary antibodies for 20 minutes and washed. For IHC reactions, the slides were then incubated with DAB (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) until desired stain intensity was observed, counterstained with hematoxylin and rinsed. Then, the slides were dehydrated in ethanol and emerged in xylene. After that, the slides were covered with cover glass and dried on a flat surface. For IF reactions, the slides were then incubated with DAPI (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) to visualize nucleic acid in each cell. After washed with PBS, anti-fluorescence quenching agent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was added. Then the slides were covered with cover glass, dried and kept in the dark to prevent bleaching fluorescent signal. Pathological slides were imaged and analyzed by using a microscope (Micromaster I; Westover Scientific, Mill Creek, Wash). For quantitative analysis, the percent of positively stained cells was counted on at least five high power (× 400) fields per slide and was assigned scores in a blinded fashion to remove observer bias [18].

Statistical analysis

In this study, SPSS 27.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was statistically significant. All continuous data were provided as means ± SD. Kruskal Wallis test was used to evaluate the significance of different treatments. When the total P was less than 0.05, Nemenyi test was used for multiple comparison. The two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the significance of treatment in tumor growth or body weight.

Results

Comparison of tumor growth after direct or indirect RFA

The tumor growth curves showed the residual tumor grew faster in the direct RFA group than the indirect RFA group (P = 0.026). And the growth rate of residual tumor in the direct RFA group (P < 0.001) or in the indirect RFA group (P = 0.042) was faster compared with that in the control group (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of tumor growth rate in mice bearing H22 liver tumor. The tumor growth curves showed the residual tumor grew faster in the direct RFA group than the indirect RFA group (P = 0.026). The tumor growth rate in the control group was the slowest compared with that in the direct RFA group (P < 0.001) and indirect RFA group (P = 0.042). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Pathological changes after direct or indirect RFA

According to the IHC/IF staining of the tumor samples obtained at 6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7d after RFA, we found significant changes with time manner in different groups on the pathological findings including HSP70, CD31, SMA, Ki-67, c-Met, IL-6, VEGF, and HIF-α (Figs. 3, 4 and 5).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Assessment of pathologic findings obtained at 6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7 days after treatment in different groups and the semi-quantitative analysis of HSP70 (A-B), Ki-67 (C-D) and SMA (E-F). The expression of HSP70 (green) was increased after RFA and reached the peak at 24 h in the direct RFA group, and was significantly higher than that in the indirect RFA group at 24 h. The expression of Ki-67 (green) increased after RFA and reached the peak at 72 h in both direct RFA and indirect RFA groups. The expression of SMA (red) was higher in the direct RFA group than the indirect RFA group after RFA and reached its peak at 6 h in the direct RFA group. The bar graph showed the percentage of positive cells among the direct RFA group (blue), indirect RFA group (red) and control group (grey) at different time points after RFA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. The representative microphotographs were under 200 × magnification (A, C, E)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Assessment of pathologic findings obtained at 6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7 days after treatment in different groups and the semi-quantitative analysis of c-Met (A-B), IL-6 (C-D) and HIF-α (E-F). The expression of c-Met increased after RFA and reached the peak at 72 h (> 50% positive rate) in both direct RFA and indirect RFA groups. The expression of IL-6 increased after RFA in the indirect RFA group and it was significantly higher than the direct RFA group from 6 h to 72 h after treatment. The expression of HIF-α was higher in the indirect RFA group than the direct RFA group from 6 h to 24 h after RFA. The bar graph showed the percentage of positive cells among the direct RFA group (blue), indirect RFA group (red) and control group (grey) at different time points after RFA. **P < 0.001. The representative microphotographs were under 200 × magnification (A, C, E)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Assessment of pathologic findings obtained at 6 h, 24 h, 72 h and 7 days after treatment in different groups and the semi-quantitative analysis of VEGF (A-B) and CD31 (C-D). The expression of VEGF in the direct RFA group and indirect RFA group were always similar at all time points. The expression of CD31 (red) was increased at 24 h after RFA in both direct RFA and indirect RFA groups compared to the control group. The bar graph showed the percentage of positive cells among the direct RFA group (blue), indirect RFA group (red) and control group (grey) at different time points after RFA. The representative microphotographs were under 200 × magnification (A, C)

Full size image

After quantitative analysis, the dynamics changes of the different markers after direct RFA and indirect RFA were shown as follows. Firstly, the higher expression of the markers was found in the direct RFA group than the indirect RFA group in HSP70, SMA and Ki-67 markers. The expression of HSP70 reached the peak at 24 h after RFA in the direct RFA group and was significantly higher than that in the indirect RFA group (73 ± 13% vs 27 ± 9%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A-B). The expression of Ki-67 in the direct RFA group was increased greatly after treatment and it was significantly higher than the indirect RFA group (51 ± 11% vs 33 ± 14% at 7d, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3C-D). The expression of SMA reached the peak at 6 h after RFA in the direct RFA group and was significantly higher than that in the indirect RFA group (70 ± 18% vs 18 ± 7%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3E-F).

Secondly, the higher expression of the c-Met, IL-6 markers was found in the indirect RFA group than the direct RFA group. The expression of c-Met in the indirect RFA group was higher than those in the direct RFA group from 6 h to 24 h after treatment (38 ± 11% vs 28 ± 9% at 24 h, P = 0.01), but there was no significant difference at 7 days after RFA (Fig. 4A-B). The expression of IL-6 in the indirect RFA group was higher than those in the direct RFA group (41 ± 10% vs 25 ± 9% at 24 h, P < 0.001) (Fig. 4C-D). Also, the expression of HIF-α in the indirect RFA group was higher than that in the direct RFA group (48 ± 10% vs 28 ± 8% at 24 h., P < 0.001) (Fig. 4E-F). On the other hand, the expression of VEGF (Fig. 5A-B) and CD31(Fig. 5C-D) in the direct RFA group and indirect RFA group were always similar at all time points.

Most importantly, the expression of c-Met (Fig. 4-B) and Ki-67 (Fig. 3-D) increased over 50% in both direct and indirect RFA group compared to the baseline (c-Met: 53% and 65% at 72 h after RFA; Ki-67: 71% and 64% at 72 h after RFA). Considering the possibility and feasibility of clinical application, c-Met was chosen as the target for inhibiting the key pathway in both direct and indirect effects of RFA.

Effect of c-Met inhibitor in the tumor growth after RFA

For H22 xenograft tumors, the measurements of the subcutaneous tumors in the two experimental groups were similar (RFA + PHA, 482.8 ± 169.8 mm3 vs RFA, 528.7 ± 78.4 mm3, P = 0.73) pretreatment. The tumor growth curve showed the tumor grew slower in the RFA + PHA group than the RFA group (P = 0.02) (Fig. 6-A). The difference began to be significant at 16 days after RFA (1112.9 ± 465.6 mm3 vs 2162.7 ± 911.1 mm3, P = 0.02). During the period of follow-up, there were no obvious changes in the health-related parameters after different treatment including: body weight (P = 0.09, Fig. 6-B), respiratory status, eating and drinking behaviors, response to stimulations, and general activity level.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of c-Met inhibitor in the tumor after RFA. A The tumor grew slower in the RFA + PHA group than the RFA group (P = 0.02). * P < 0.05. B During the period of follow-up, there were no obvious difference in the bodyweight change after treatment in the two experimental groups (P = 0.09). C Assessment of c-Met, HIF-α, Ki-67 and CD31 (brown) staining on pathologic findings obtained at 7 days after RFA in different groups. The expression decreased in the RFA + PHA group compared to the RFA group. **P < 0.001. The representative microphotographs were under 200 × magnification (C)

Full size image

IHC staining revealed that the expression of c-Met (38 ± 3% vs 15 ± 3%), HIF-α (38 ± 4% vs 20 ± 3%), Ki-67 (50 ± 4% vs 27 ± 4%) and CD31 (23 ± 3% vs 12 ± 3%) in the tumor were decreased at 7 days in the RFA + PHA group compared to the RFA group (P < 0.001 for all comparisons) (Fig. 6-C).

Discussion

RFA is a minimally invasive treatment for tumors which has been confirmed satisfactory efficacy and low complication [19, 20]. During ablation, local hyperthermia caused by the electrode leads to the cell coagulation necrosis and the changes of the tumor microenvironment. Some studies have found that incomplete RFA could stimulate tumor invasiveness, manifested as accelerated growth and enhanced metastasis [21,22,23]. What’s more, it was reported that RFA induced not only a local periablational inflammatory zone but also the distant tumor growth [24,25,26]. Elevated serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and growth factor might be an early indicator of the incomplete RFA and subsequently a potential tumor relapse [24, 27]. In our previous studies, we also found that residual tumor progressed more rapidly and developed several methods to improve the efficacy of RFA, but the effects to the tumor microenvironment was not yet clear [28, 29]. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to explore the effect of RFA to tumor microenvironment and look for the key cytokine or pathway for target therapy.

In our study, we developed the animal model to elucidate the direct and indirect effects of RFA to the tumor microenvironment. The tumor was divided into two halves in the middle before RFA and a glass slide was set inside to block the thermal transmission to the other half of the tumor (indirect RFA group). The temperature of the electrode tip was set at 65 ± 2 °C, applying 5 minutes and the diameter of necrosis area could reach 7 mm, so that half of the tumor was complete necrotic. In this way, the unablated tumor was regulated by the indirect effect caused by heat. On the other hand, the tumor in the direct RFA group was regulated by both direct heat effect and indirect effect. The direct effect refers to the ablation, which was closely related to heat shock (HSP70), inflammatory reaction for thermal damage (IL-6). Indirect effect refers to re-regulation of tissue metabolic function and cell proliferation (HIF-α, SMA, Ki-67), angiogenesis (VEGF, CD31) or growth factor (HGF, c-Met), which occurs even after ablation. We try to look for the key pathway which played an important role in both direct and indirect effects so that to find the potential target point for pharmacologic suppression of these effects.

We investigated the expression of several heat related markers including HSP70、SMA、VEGF、CD31、Ki-67、HIF-α, IL-6, and c-Met. The effects of RFA to the tumor microenvironment could be linked to the activation of IL-6/HGF/c-Met pathway which produce downstream angiogenesis and VEGF production [30]. These factors also play important roles in promoting tumor growth and invasiveness, which was evaluated by Ki-67、SMA and CD31 in our study [31,32,33]. The expression of SMA and Ki-67 were up-regulated after RFA and increased more notably in the direct RFA group, indicating the direct heat effect contributes to the tumorigenesis. While the c-Met and IL-6 were more pronounced positive expressed in the indirect RFA group, providing the evidence of stimulation of aggressive tumor biology. Meanwhile, we noticed several other potential pathways linked to the RFA effects, including hypoxia, which is related to tumor invasiveness [34]. The expression of HIF-α which reflects the hypoxic microenvironment, increased more significantly in the indirect RFA group, suggesting the host of secondary reactions after RFA. Additionally, heat stress responses was also another stimulation after RFA and was assessed by heat shock protein. HSP70 plays an important role in alleviating cell damage, enhancing anti-apoptotic ability and immune regulation [35, 36]. The high expression of HSP70 was observed in the direct RFA group 24 h after RFA, which was directly related to the heat affect. Our results provided the evidence of several mechanistic pathways contributing to the direct and indirect effect of RFA. It is noteworthy that the indirect effect also occurred rapidly after RFA (within hours to days), it was quite necessary to identify and eliminate the residual tumor as soon as possible. And the adjuvant therapy is particularly necessary when tumor residue is suspected. Interestingly, the expression of c-Met and Ki-67 showed the maximum level of upregulation in both direct and indirect RFA group compared to the baseline. Ki-67 refers to the proliferation of the tumor and the combination of the chemotherapeutic drugs with RFA has been studied a lot. Therefore, as a next step, we focused on the upregulation of the HGF/c-Met pathway after RFA, which was known as driving tumor growth, metastatic invasion, and aggressive tumor biology [37, 38]. It was reported that HGF/c-Met could lead to initiate several downstream signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT, Ras/MAPK, JAK/STAT, which were involved in tumor progression [39]. And the c-Met pathway was interconnected with VEGF and VEGF receptor, which promoted angiogenesis and endothelial cell growth [40]. Therefore, c-Met is a promising target for tumor and several HGF/c-Met targeting inhibitors and antibodies have been developed.

Gaurav Kumar reported that c-Met inhibitor could block HGF/c-Met pathway which mediated distant subcutaneous tumor growth after RFA of normal liver [30]. In this study, we explored the role of c-Met inhibitor in the residual progression after ablation of tumor. We demonstrated that activated pathways contributing to the effects of RFA could be blocked by combining adjuvant drug against key receptor target. The PHA inhibitor has a strong selectivity for c-Met and can induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [41]. According to the IHC staining, the expression of c-Met remained elevated until 7 days after RFA. Therefore, the PHA was applied four times to cover this period. RFA combined with PHA showed slower tumor growth, while RFA alone group showed positive tumor growth. Because the tumor after RFA was relatively small in size, the differences of early growth rate in different groups was not obvious. At 14 days after treatment, differences between RFA and RFA + PHA groups began to become apparent. No organ metastasis was found at the end of the follow up. Then, we investigated the expression of the related markers after the combination therapy including c-Met, HIF-α, Ki-67 and CD31. The results indicated the PHA could down regulate the expression of c-Met and influence the cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. These findings supported the role of adjuvant inhibition of c-Met via PHA could suppress RFA induced tumor progression. During the toxicity experiment, the PHA showed no special biological toxicity. We preliminarily verified the efficacy of the PHA in combination with RFA treatment through the animal experiments.

There were several limitations in our study. First, we just preliminarily explored the expression of some heat or inflammatory related markers through pathological staining, but the effect of ablation was more than that. The changes of immune microenvironment and serum protein profiles after RFA have not been studied. Comparative proteome research and subsequent validation are needed to clarify the mechanism of ablation effect. Second, we only evaluated the proliferation and angiogenesis under the combination of RFA and PHA, the further effects such as tumor stemness, immune suppression of blocking the c-Met pathway on the tumor microenvironment needed to be explored in the next step. PHA is an effective c-Met inhibitor, but the clinically available c-Met pathway inhibitors and its level of inhibition after RFA remains to be explored. Third, we studied the effect of RFA with only one cell line and one subcutaneous model, further characterization in other tumor cell lines and the use of orthotopic model are necessary to characterize the effects of different tumors and microenvironments. Furthermore, we chose radiofrequency as the energy source to ablate the subsequent tumor in this study as the treatment method, but other local treatment such as microwave ablation and interventional therapy are used clinically now. Other studies could be developed to determine whether similar effects herein are present.

In conclusion, the direct and indirect effects of RFA on tumor microenvironment occur at different times and result in acceleration growth of residual tumor growth in the animal model. The inhibitor of PHA could help suppress this phenomenon and achieve better overall outcome with combination of RFA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Dos Santos I, Haemmerich D, Schutt D, da Rocha AF, Menezes LR. Probabilistic finite element analysis of radiofrequency liver ablation using the unscented transform. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:627–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brace CL. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38:135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi X, Pan H, Ge H, et al. Subsequent cooling-circulation after radiofrequency and microwave ablation avoids secondary indirect damage induced by residual thermal energy. Diagn Interv Radiol (Ankara, Turkey). 2019;25(4):291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nikfarjam M, Muralidharan V, Christophi C. Mechanisms of focal heat destruction of liver tumors. J Surg Res. 2005;127:208–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT, Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011;258:351–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(3):199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dromi SA, et al. Radiofrequency ablation induces antigen-presenting cell infiltration and amplification of weak tumor-induced immunity. Radiology. 2009;251:58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wissniowski TT, et al. Activation of tumor-specific T lymphocytes by radio-frequency ablation of the VX2 hepatoma in rabbits. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6496–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zerbini A, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma stimulates autologous NK-cell response. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1931–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali MY, et al. Activation of dendritic cells by local ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2005;43:817–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fietta AM, et al. Systemic inflammatory response and downmodulation of peripheral CD25+Foxp3+ T-regulatory cells in patients undergoing radiofrequency thermal ablation for lung cancer. Hum Immunol. 2009;70:477–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Erinjeri JP, et al. Image-guided thermal ablation of tumors increases the plasma level of Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad F, et al. Changes in interleukin-1β and 6 after hepatic microwave tissue ablation compared with radiofrequency, cryotherapy and surgical resections. Am J Surg. 2010;200:500–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed M, Kumar G, Navarro G, et al. Systemic siRNA nanoparticle-based drugs combined with radiofrequency ablation for cancer therapy. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0128910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar G, Goldberg SN, Wang Y, et al. Hepatic radiofrequency ablation: markedly reduced systemic effects by modulating periablational inflammation via cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(3):1238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang S, Mei XG, Goldberg SN, et al. Does thermosensitive liposomal vinorelbine improve end-point survival after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors in a mouse model? Radiology. 2016;279(3):150787.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang AN, Liu JT, Zhao K, et al. Specific inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase decreases tumor invasiveness after radiofrequency ablation in liver tumor animal model. Front Oncol. 2020;10:561805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang W, Ahmed M, Elian M, Hady ES, Levchenko TS, Sawant RR, et al. Do liposomal apoptotic enhancers increase tumor coagulation and end-point survival in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of tumors in a rat tumor model? Radiology. 2010;257(3):685–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan K, Chen MH, Yang W, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcome and prognostic factors. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67(2):336–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang Y, Chen W, Liang X, Li D, Lou H, Chen R, et al. Comparison of Longterm Effectiveness and Complications of Radiofrequency Ablation with Hepatectomy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(1):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shiozawa K, Watanabe M, Takahashi M, Wakui N, Iida K, Sumino Y. Analysis of patients with rapid aggressive tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56(96):1689–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Deng Q, Feng F, Chen S, Jiang J, Xia F, et al. Insufficient radiofrequency ablation promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell progression via autophagy and the CD133 feedback loop. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(1):241–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang N, Li H, Qin C, Ma D, Zhao Y, Zhu W, et al. Insufficient radiofrequency ablation promotes the metastasis of residual hepatocellular carcinoma cells via upregulating flotillin proteins. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145(4):895–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rozenblum N, Zeira E, Bulvik B, et al. Radiofrequency ablation: inflammatory changes in the periablative zone can induce global organ effects, including liver regeneration. Radiology. 2015;276(2):416–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rozenblum N, Zeira E, Scaiewicz V, Bulvik B, Gourevitch S, Yotvat H, et al. Oncogenesis: an “off-target” effect of radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2015;276(2):426–32. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015141695 PMID: 26203709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liao H, Ahmed M, Markezana A, et al. Thermal ablation induces transitory metastatic growth by means of the STAT3/c-Met molecular pathway in an intrahepatic colorectal cancer mouse model. Radiology. 2019;191023.

  27. Schneider T, Sevko A, Heussel CP, et al. Serum inflammatory factors and circulating immunosuppressive cells are predictive markers for efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;180(3):467–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu H, Li SS, Zhou M, Jiang AN, He Y, Wang S, et al. Palliative Radiofrequency Ablation Accelerates the Residual Tumor Progression Through Increasing Tumor-Infiltrating MDSCs and Reducing T-Cell-Mediated Anti-Tumor Immune Responses in Animal Model. Front Oncol. 2020;(10):1308.

  29. Wu H, Fan ZP, Jiang AN, Di XS, He B, Wang S, et al. Combination of intratumoural micellar paclitaxel with radiofrequency ablation: efficacy and toxicity in rodents. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(11):6202–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmed M, Kumar G, Moussa M, et al. Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation-induced Stimulation of Distant Tumor Growth Is Suppressed by c-Met Inhibition. Radiology. 2016;279(1):150080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stadlbauer V, Lang-Olip I, Leber B, Mayrhauser U, Koestenbauer S, Tawdrous M, et al. Immunohistochemical and radiological characterization of wound healing in porcine liver after radiofrequency ablation. Histol Histopathol. 2016;31(1):115–29 Epub 2015 Sep 11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Studer LL, Selby DM. Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(2):263–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sales Gil R, Vagnarelli P. Ki-67: More Hidden behind a ‘Classic Proliferation Marker’ [J]. Trends Biochem Sci. 2018;43(10):747–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiao M, Nan KJ. Activation of PI3 kinase/Akt/HIF-1α pathway contributes to hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2012;40(2):461–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Teng LS, Jin KT, Han N, Cao J. Radiofrequency ablation, heat shock protein 70 and potential anti-tumor immunity in hepatic and pancreatic cancers: a minireview. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010;9(4):361–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang C, Zhang Y, Guo K, et al. Heat shock proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular mechanism and therapeutic potential. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1824–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. García-Vilas JA, Medina MA. Updates on the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met axis in hepatocellular carcinoma and its therapeutic implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(33):3695–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar G, Goldberg SN, Gourevitch S, et al. Targeting STAT3 to Suppress Systemic Pro-Oncogenic Effects from Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation. Radiology. 2018;286(2):524–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, Xia M, Jin K, et al. Function of the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase in carcinogenesis and associated thera- peutic opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sivakumar M, Jayakumar M, Seedevi P, Sivasankar P, Ravikumar M, Surendar S, et al. Meta-analysis of functional expression and mutational analysis of c-Met in various cancers. Curr Probl Cancer. 2020;44(4):100515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu X, Newton RC, Scherle PA. Development of c-MET pathway inhibitors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011;20(9):1225–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971718), Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (7222020) and Beijing Baiqianwan Talents Project (2020A47).

Author information

Author notes

  1. An-Na Jiang and Bing Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, 100142, China

    An-Na Jiang, Bing Wang, Song Wang, Kun Zhao, Hao Wu, Kun Yan, Wei Wu & Wei Yang

Authors
  1. An-Na Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Song Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kun Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kun Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ANJ and BW performed the experiments and analyzed the data. WY, SW, KZ and HW verified the results and reviewed the data. KY and WW gave some important opinions about the experimental design. ANJ wrote the draft version of this paper. WY revised the paper and gave some important opinions about the design. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods carried out were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Peking University, Cancer Hospital) and in accordance the guidelines and regulations of the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science (ICLAS) and all methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

The details of the ICLAS Ethical Guideline was shown as follows:

1. All animals have an intrinsic value, i.e. their welfare and wellbeing should be protected not because they have an instrumental value by religious, social, financial or any other standards, but because they have an intrinsic value.

2. Following the theory of moderate biocentrism animals deserve protection of their welfare and wellbeing according to their position with the scala naturae, i.e. higher developed animals need stronger protection than lower developed animals.

3. The use of animals in experimental research should be avoided, where ever it is possible (Replacement).

4. If animal research is necessary, as few animals as possible should be used (Reduction).

5. Using animals for necessary experimental research should only be performed under high quality standards i.e. optimal methods, especially avoiding unnecessary pain (Refinement).

6. For animal experiments with the expectation of severe suffering or pain humane endpoints need to be defined in advance.

7. Persons using animals in experimental research take over the responsibility for the welfare and wellbeing of their animals (Responsibility).

8. Only persons with adequate training are allowed to perform or participate animal experiments.

9. Animal experiments must be ethically justified by the responsible researcher as well as assured of an ethical review by a committee respecting the regional legislation, religion and moral.

10. Results of animal experiments need to be published whenever possible in order to avoid unnecessary further experiments addressing the same issues.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, AN., Wang, B., Wang, S. et al. The study of direct and indirect effects of radiofrequency ablation on tumor microenvironment in liver tumor animal model. BMC Cancer 22, 663 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09730-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09730-x

Keywords

  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Liver tumor
  • Tumor microenvironment
  • Direct effect
  • Indirect effect

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us