Skip to main content
Download PDF

Serum long non-coding RNA SCARNA10 serves as a potential diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 431 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Circulating long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been demonstrated to serve as diagnostic or prognosis biomarkers for various disease. We aimed to elucidate the diagnostic efficacy of serum lncRNA SCARNA10 for the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In this study, a total of 182 patients with HCC, 105 patients with benign liver disease (BLD), and 149 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. According to different classifications, the levels of serum SCARNA10 were assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The correlations between serum SCARNA10 and clinicopathological characteristics were further analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were utilized to estimate the diagnostic capacity of serum SCARNA10 and its combination with AFP for HCC.

Results

The results demonstrated that the levels of serum SCARNA10 were significantly higher in HCC patients than in patients with BLD and healthy controls, and significantly increased in HCC patients with hepatitis B or C infection, or with liver cirrhosis. Furthermore, positive correlations were noted between serum SCARNA10 level and some clinicopathological characteristics, including tumor size, differentiation degrees, tumor stage, vascular invasion, tumor metastasis and complications. ROC analysis revealed that SCARNA10 had a significantly predictive value for HCC (Sensitivity = 0.70, Specificity = 0.77, and AUC = 0.82), the combination of SCARNA10 and AFP gained the higher sensitivity (AUCSCARNA10 + AFP = 0.92 vs AUCAFP = 0.83, p <  0.01). SCARNA10 retained significant diagnosis capabilities for AFP-negative HCC patients.

Conclusions

In summary, lncRNA SCARNA10 may serve as a novel and non-invasive biomarker with relatively high sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors globally with relatively high morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. Although great progresses made in HCC therapy in recent years, the prognosis of HCC patients still remains poor due to being diagnosed at an advanced stage and high rate of recurrence [1, 3]. Currently, histological examination of the tumor tissue serves as the standard procedure for definitive diagnosis of HCC, and imaging examinations including computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the common supplement procedures [4]. However, their application has been limited due to invasiveness, insensitivity to small tumors, and high cost [5]. For serum biomarkers, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) is one of the most widely used biomarkers for HCC diagnosis clinically. Nevertheless, the sensitivity and specificity of AFP are unsatisfactory, especially for patients with early-stage HCC. In addition, AFP may be elevated in some benign liver diseases, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis [6, 7]. Therefore, it is of great value to detect convenient, non-invasive, inexpensive and repeatable serum biomarkers in the HCC diagnosis.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNA, which is longer than 200 nucleotides in length [8]. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that lncRNAs play important roles in various physiological and pathological processes [9, 10]. LncRNAs have been proved to play important roles as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes in different cancer types [11]. Current researchers have found that lncRNA abnormal expression profile has close relationships with HCC developments [12]. Several circulating lncRNAs have been implied to be promising markers with high accuracies and efficiencies for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC, for instance, HULC, MALAT1 and UCA1 [13,14,15,16,17]. However, the diagnostic value of many lncRNAs for HCC reported by different researchers remains controversial and needs further investigation. Moreover, the diagnostic efficacy of only a small number of circulating lncRNAs has been confirmed. The majority of circulating lncRNAs involved in HCC still remains largely unclear.

Previously, we identified lncRNA Small Cajal body-specific RNA 10 (SCARNA10) is up-regulated in the serum and liver tissue samples from patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis, which promotes liver fibrosis both in vitro and in vivo through inducing HCs apoptosis and HSCs activation [18]. It has been reported that SCARNA10 is one of the highest expressed in 615 differentially expressed lncRNAs of breast cancer [19]. SCARNA10 has also been reported to play important potential functions in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) [20]. Although the function of SCARNA10 in liver tissues are beginning to be understood, its roles in serum of HCC patients require further study.

Here, we initially found that serum SCARNA10 level is higher in HCC than in healthy controls, SCARNA10 level was correlated with tumor differentiation degrees, size, stage, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and complications. Combined detection of SCARNA10 and AFP was more effective for the diagnosis of HCC. SCARNA10 may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for HCC.

Methods and materials

Patients and specimens

This study analyzed a total of 281 serum samples obtained from 127 patients diagnosed with HCC, 55 patients diagnosed with benign liver disease (BLD) and 99 healthy controls (HC) at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (Tianjin, China) between October 2019 and March 2021. In addition, we collected 50 patients diagnosed with HCC, 50 patients with BLD and 50 HCs at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital for external validation. Patients with hemorrhagic or thrombotic diseases and those who have taken anticoagulant agents such as warfarin and similar drugs or vitamin K within 6 months of enrollment were excluded. The baseline characteristics of HCC patients, BLD patients and HCs were summarized in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of HC, patients with BLD and HCC
Full size table

Venous blood were collected from the participants before treatment, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min, transferred the supernatant to EP tube, and quickly frozen to − 80 °C for later use, avoiding freezing and thawing cycles. Clinicopathological feature data including age, sex, tumor size and number, stage, lymph node and distant metastasis, vascular invasion, differentiation degree and complicatons were collected.

RNA extraction and qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from equal volume of serum samples with TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. All RNAs were digested with DNase I (Takara, Dalian, China). cDNA was generated using the First-strand cDNA synthesize kit (#1622, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with random hexamer primers in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The synthesized cDNA templates were further amplified by SYBR Green master kit (Takara, Dalian, China), and the expression of β-actin was used as the internal control. We calculated the relative expression values by comparing the normalized cycle threshold (Ct). The sequences of primers were as follows: SCARNA10 (forward): 5′-GTTTGGCTAAGCCCAGGGAC-3′, (reverse): 5′-GTTGGTCTGCCCTTACAGTGA-3′; β-actin (forward): 5′-GCCGGGACCTGACTGACTAC-3′, (reverse): 5′-TTCTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT-3′.

Quantification of serum AFP levels using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays

Serum AFP levels were measured using the Roche Cobas E601 electrochemical immune luminescence analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) equipped with Roche dedicated reagents following the instructions provided by the manufacturer.

Statistical analysis

The date was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test to assess differences between groups. Spearman’s correlation test was used to determine the relationship between serum SCARNA10 levels and biochemical parameters. The ROC analysis was performed to obtain the area under the curve (AUC), cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Z-test was used to compare the AUCs between two groups, and ANOVA with post hoc analysis was used for the comparison of three groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The expression level of lncRNA SCARNA10 in serum of HCC patients

To determine the significance of lncRNA SCARNA10 in HCC, the expression levels of SCARNA10 in serum of 127 HCC patients, 55 benign liver disease (BLD) and 99 healthy controls (HC) were examined by qPCR analysis. The relative serum levels of SCARNA10 in HCC patients were significantly higher than that in patients diagnosed with BLD and HC (both p <  0.05, Fig. 1). Simultaneously, we observed that SCARNA10 expression levels were not significantly difference between patients with BLD and HC (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we verified the level of SCARNA10 in external samples, including 50 patients with HCC, 50 patients with BLD and 50 HCs, and the results also showed that the level of SCARNA10 was increased in the serum of patients with HCC (Supplementary Figure 1). These results suggested that SCARNA10 can be used as a potential diagnostic biomarker for HCC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Serum SCARNA10 levels in participants. A, B The relative levels of SCARNA10 in patients with HCC, benign liver diseases (BLD) and healthy controls (HC) were performed by qPCR. Scatter plot (A) and bar plot (B) are shown for SCARNA10 in HCC, BLD and HC. *p <  0.05

Full size image

Subgroup analysis of serum SCARNA10 level in HCC patients

According to different classification methods, we further found that serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection were significantly higher than those without virus infection controls (both p <  0.05, Fig. 2A-B), but there was no significant difference in the expression of SCARNA10 between HCC patients infected with HBV and HCV (Fig. 2A-B). Moreover, serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with liver cirrhosis were significantly increased (p <  0.05, Fig. 2C-D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Serum SCARNA10 levels in patients with HCC. A, B Serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, or virus infection with neither (Ctrl). Scatter plot (A) and bar plot (B) are shown for SCARNA10. C, D Serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis were performed by qPCR. Scatter plot (C) and bar plot (D) are shown for SCARNA10. *p <  0.05

Full size image

Association between clinicopathological features and SCARNA10 expression levels in HCC

To investigate the clinical significance of SCARNA10 expression in HCC, the relationship between serum SCARNA10 levels and clinicopathological features in HCC patients were summarized in Table 2. We found that SCARNA10 expression was significantly correlated with tumor size and differentiation degrees (both p <  0.01). Moreover, serum SCARNA10 levels was positively correlated with the tumor stage (p <  0.01). Serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were significantly increased (all p < 0.05). Simultaneously, serum SCARNA10 levels in patients experiencing complications were significantly higher than the levels observed in patients without complications (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant correlation between the SCARNA10 levels and age, sex, or tumor numbers.

Table 2 Correlation of serum SCARNA10 levels with clinipathological parameters in HCC
Full size table

The diagnostic value of SCARNA10 in HCC patients

To further explore the utility of SCARNA10 as a promising diagnostic molecular marker for HCC, ROC curves of SCARNA10 and AFP were plotted in participants. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 3, both markers showed remarkable diagnostic performance in distinguishing HCC from HC, and both markers showed remarkable diagnostic performance when it came to distinguishing HCC from BLD. The AUCs of the combined markers were significantly greater than SCARNA10 or AFP alone in all groups. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of the two combined markers were also increased, respectively. Additionally, we plotted ROC curves of SCARNA10 and AFP in participants of external validation (Supplementary Figure 2). The AUCs, sensitivity, specificity and cut-off were also showed in supplementary Table 2. These results of the external verification are consistent with the main text.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SCARNA10 and AFP complementation in the diagnosis of HCC. ROC of SCARNA10, AFP, SCARNA10 + AFP to distinguish HCC from HC (A), and BLD (B)

Full size image
Table 3 Performances of SCARNA10 and AFP for the diagnosis of HCC patients
Full size table

Efficacy of SCARNA10 in the diagnosis of AFP-negative HCC patients

To further estimate the complementary role of SCARNA10 for AFP in the diagnosis of HCC, the diagnostic value of SCARNA10 were assessed in HCC patients that were missed by AFP, based on the cut-off values obtained in this study (12.40 ng/ml and 31.20 ng/ml). As shown in Fig. 4 and Table 4, SCARNA10 showed a significant ability in distinguishing AFP-negative HCC from healthy controls with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Performance of SCARNA10 in the diagnosis of AFP-negative HCC patients. ROC of SCARNA10 to distinguish HCC AFP-negative from HC (A), and BLD (B), respectively

Full size image
Table 4 Performance of SCARNA10 for the diagnosis of AFP-negative HCC patients
Full size table

Discussion

Currently, the identification of novel potential serum biomarkers for the detection of HCC remains a vital goal, particularly for the diagnosis of early-stage HCC. Nevertheless, only a few biomarker candidates have been translated to clinical applications due to the limited study cohorts or diagnostic performance. For instance, so far, there is still only AFP as the most commonly used biomarker for HCC patients, despite its unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity [7]. Several HCC-related lncRNAs can be present in the body fluid, as is the case lncRNAs UCA1, WRAP53, PVT1, ATB and uc002mbe.2 [17, 21,22,23]. The representative lncRNA HULC is detectable in blood sample and can be easily quantified by conventional qPCR [24]. These findings have suggested a non-invasive approach for HCC diagnosis through circulating lncRNA measurement. Our study is the first to examine the potential diagnostic utility of serum SCARNA10 in HCC patients.

As previously researches, a large number of lncRNAs are aberrantly expressed in HCC compared with normal liver tissue, which is useful to distinguish HCC patients from healthy cohorts [25]. However, some of those lncRNAs are also shown aberrant expression patterns in other cancer types or non-cancerous situations such as cirrhosis or liver injury, resulting in reduced reliability. Thus, lncRNAs combined with other molecules, especially known HCC biomarker AFP, is more likely to be a desirable HCC diagnosis method instead of evaluating lncRNA alone. For example, the combination of two lncRNAs UCA1 and WRAP53 with AFP achieves sensitivity up to 100% [21]. Similarly, the combination of another two lncRNAs PVT1 and uc002mbe.2 with AFP have been also shown to perform much better than AFP alone in HCC diagnosis [22]. Besides AFP, other molecules including miRNAs or mRNAs can also predict HCC in combination with lncRNAs [26]. In this study, for the first time, we found that the levels of SCARNA10 in HCC patients were significantly higher than that in BLD patients and healthy controls. Moreover, the SCARNA10 levels were not notable divergence between BLD patients and HC. These demonstrated that serum SCARNA10 levels can clearly distinguish benign and malignant liver tumors. In addition, the ROC analysis suggested that the AUCs of the combined SCARNA10 and AFP were greater than one alone in distinguishing HCC from BLD and HCC from HC. The sensitivity of the two combined markers were also increased. Finally, in AFP-negative HCC, SCARNA10 also showed a significant ability with higher sensitivity and specificity. All these findings indicated that SCARNA10 can serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for HCC.

HBV infection is the major risk factor for HCC development. Worldwide, > 50% of HCC cases are associated with HBV infection [2, 27]. Several lines of evidence have supported the direct involvement of HBV in driving hepatocarcinogenesis. For example, the HBV genome can integrate into the human genome, contributing to genomic instability and generation of oncogenic chimeric transcripts [28]. HBV protein X (HBx) is highly carcinogenic, and 90% of HBx transgenic mice develop HCC [29]. HCV infection is a major cause of cirrhosis and consequently HCC [30]. The molecular mechanisms underlying HCV-induced HCC development might differ from those associated with HBV infection. HCV could promote HCC formation by upregulating host miRNAs and deregulating cellular signaling pathways [31, 32]. In this study, we found that serum SCARNA10 levels in HCC patients with HBV or HCV infection were significantly higher than those without infection controls, and in HCC patients with liver cirrhosis were also increased. These results demonstrated that SCARNA10 may play a role in HCC by regulating a common pathway in HBV or HCV. All these provide ideas for further research on the function and mechanism of SCARNA10 in HCC.

In conclusion, we found the serum SCARNA10 level was increased in HCC patients, and associated with some clinicopathological features, including tumor size, differentiation degrees, stage, vascular invasion, metastasis and complications. The combined detection of SCARNA10 and AFP significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity of HCC. However, the roles of SCARNA10 in HCC need to be elucidated in more detail. In future study, we will further research the definite function and mechanism of SCARNA10 in liver carcinogenesis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author without restriction.

Abbreviations

lncRNAs:

Long non-coding RNAs

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

BLD:

Benign liver disease

HC:

Healthy controls

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under curve

CT:

Computer tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

AFP:

Alpha fetoprotein

SCARNA10:

Small Cajal body-specific RNA 10

References

  1. Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(10):589–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021;73(Suppl 1):4–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(10):599–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts LR, Sirlin CB, Zaiem F, Almasri J, Prokop LJ, Heimbach JK, et al. Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):401–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulik L, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(2):477–491 e471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, et al. Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1706–1718 e1701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo P, Yin P, Hua R, Tan Y, Li Z, Qiu G, et al. A large-scale, multicenter serum metabolite biomarker identification study for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(2):662–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodall GJ, Wickramasinghe VO. RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(1):22–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopp F, Mendell JT. Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2018;172(3):393–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gal Z, Gezsi A, Semsei AF, Nagy A, Sultesz M, Csoma Z, et al. Investigation of circulating lncRNAs as potential biomarkers in chronic respiratory diseases. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Statello L, Guo CJ, Chen LL, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):96–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong CM, Tsang FH, Ng IO. Non-coding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular functions and pathological implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(3):137–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang J, Zheng Y, Xiao X, Liu C, Lin J, Zheng S, et al. A circulating long noncoding RNA panel serves as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:5417598.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Liao Z, Liu F, Su C, Zhu H, Li Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA HULC promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(20):9111–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao Z, Jia C, Tai Y, Liang H, Zhong Z, Xiong Z, et al. Serum exosomal long noncoding RNAs lnc-FAM72D-3 and lnc-EPC1-4 as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(12):11843–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonohara F, Inokawa Y, Hayashi M, Yamada S, Sugimoto H, Fujii T, et al. Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA HULC and MALAT1 following the curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng ZK, Pang C, Yang Y, Duan Q, Zhang J, Liu WC. Serum long noncoding RNA urothelial carcinoma-associated 1: a novel biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(1):348–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang K, Han Y, Hu Z, Zhang Z, Shao S, Yao Q, et al. SCARNA10, a nuclear-retained long non-coding RNA, promotes liver fibrosis and serves as a potential biomarker. Theranostics. 2019;9(12):3622–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia Y, Shi L, Yun F, Liu X, Chen Y, Wang M, et al. Transcriptome sequencing profiles reveal lncRNAs may involve in breast cancer (ER/PR positive type) by interaction with RAS associated genes. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(6):152405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lei Y, Shi Y, Duan J, Liu Y, Lv G, Shi R, et al. Identification of alternative splicing and lncRNA genes in pathogenesis of small cell lung cancer based on their RNA sequencing. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(8):1043–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamel MM, Matboli M, Sallam M, Montasser IF, Saad AS, El-Tawdi AHF. Investigation of long noncoding RNAs expression profile as potential serum biomarkers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl Res. 2016;168:134–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu J, Han J, Zhang J, Li G, Liu H, Cui X, et al. The long noncoding RNAs PVT1 and uc002mbe.2 in sera provide a new supplementary method for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(31):e4436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan JH, Yang F, Wang F, Ma JZ, Guo YJ, Tao QF, et al. A long noncoding RNA activated by TGF-beta promotes the invasion-metastasis cascade in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(5):666–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Panzitt K, Tschernatsch MM, Guelly C, Moustafa T, Stradner M, Strohmaier HM, et al. Characterization of HULC, a novel gene with striking up-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma, as noncoding RNA. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):330–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Qu L, Cai X, Xu J, Wei X, Qu X, Sun L, et al. Six long noncoding RNAs as potentially biomarkers involved in competitive endogenous RNA of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Med. 2020;20(3):437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klingenberg M, Matsuda A, Diederichs S, Patel T. Non-coding RNA in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms, biomarkers and therapeutic targets. J Hepatol. 2017;67(3):603–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(12):3030–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao Q, Zhu H, Dong L, Shi W, Chen R, Song Z, et al. Integrated Proteogenomic characterization of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2019;179(2):561–577 e522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu QG, Yuan SX, Tao QF, Yu J, Cai J, Yang Y, et al. A novel HBx genotype serves as a preoperative predictor and fails to activate the JAK1/STATs pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;70(5):904–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamdane N, Juhling F, Crouchet E, El Saghire H, Thumann C, Oudot MA, et al. HCV-induced epigenetic changes associated with liver Cancer risk persist after sustained Virologic response. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(8):2313–2329 e2317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lupberger J, Croonenborghs T, Roca Suarez AA, Van Renne N, Juhling F, Oudot MA, et al. Combined analysis of metabolomes, proteomes, and transcriptomes of hepatitis C virus-infected cells and liver to identify pathways associated with disease development. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(2):537–551 e539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Renne N, Roca Suarez AA, Duong FHT, Gondeau C, Calabrese D, Fontaine N, et al. miR-135a-5p-mediated downregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta is a candidate driver of HCV-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Gut. 2018;67(5):953–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Education Commission (No. 2020KJ129).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China

    Yawei Han, Wenna Jiang, Yu Wang, Meng Zhao, Yueguo Li & Li Ren

  2. College of Inspection, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

    Yu Wang

Authors
  1. Yawei Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenna Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yueguo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.H, L. R and Y.L conceived and designed the studies. Y.H and W.J performed the majority of the experiments. Y.W collected the clinical samples. Y.H and M.Z analyzed the data. Y.H, Y.L and L.R wrote the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yueguo Li or Li Ren.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (No. Ek2020192). The study methodologies were conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects were over 18 years of age and voluntarily signed informed consent forms.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no conflicting interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary figure 1.

Serum SCARNA10 levels in participants of external validation. (A-B) The relative levels of SCARNA10 in patients with HCC, benign liver diseases (BLD) and healthy controls (HC) were performed by qPCR. Scatter plot (A) and bar plot (B) are shown for SCARNA10 in HCC, BLD and HC. *p < 0.05. Supplementary figure 2. SCARNA10 and AFP complementation in the diagnosis of HCC. ROC of SCARNA10, AFP, SCARNA10 + AFP to distinguish HCC from HC (A), and BLD (B). Supplementary Table 1. Characteristics of participants in external validation. Supplementary Table 2. Performances of SCARNA10 and AFP for the diagnosis of HCC patients in external validation.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Y., Jiang, W., Wang, Y. et al. Serum long non-coding RNA SCARNA10 serves as a potential diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 22, 431 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09530-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09530-3

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us