Skip to main content

Nomograms to predict the prognosis in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a large cohort study



Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) are rare gynecologic neoplasms. The use of nomograms that are based on various clinical indicators to predict the prognosis of MOGCTs are currently lacking.


Clinical and demographic information of patients with MOGCT recorded between 2004 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and Cox regression analysis was performed to screen for important independent prognostic factors. Prognostic factors were used to construct predictive calculational charts for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). The externally validated case cohort included a total of 121 MOGCT patients whose data were recorded from 2008 to 2019 from the database of the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.


A total of 1401 patients with MOGCT were recruited for the study. A nomogram was used to forecast the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS using data pertaining to age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, histological subtype and grade, and surgical type. Nomograms have a more accurate predictive ability and clinical utility than FIGO staging alone. Internal and external validation also demonstrated satisfactory consistency between projected and actual OS.


A nomogram constructed using multiple clinical indicators provided a more accurate prognosis than FIGO staging alone. This nomogram may assist clinicians in identifying patients who are at increased risk, thus implementing individualized treatment regimens.

Peer Review reports


Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) constitute approximately 1–2% of all ovarian malignant tumors with a predilection to the younger age group, especially during late adolescence and young adulthood [1, 2]. MOGCTs mainly include dysgerminomas, yolk sac tumors, teratocarcinomas, non-gestational choriocarcinomas, and mixed MOGCTs containing at least two types of malignant tissue [3]. Due to the sensitivity of MOGCTs to chemotherapy, most patients undergo fertility preservation surgeries [4]. The prognosis is usually good, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95% for stage I tumors and 73% for advanced stage II–IV tumors [5]. Mangili et al. showed that the OS of patients with MOGCTs is correlated to tumor stage and histological classification, but not surgical type, tumor size, or tumor marker elevation [5]. Newton et al. also determined that histology has a significant effect on prognosis [6]. However, the risk factors for OS in patients with MOGCTs have not been evaluated in a large multicenter cohort.

In the current study, the incidence of tumor and survival data of approximately 34.6% of all cancers in the US were collected from the Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (, which is a reliable cancer information source [7]. A study based on the SEER database has the advantage of targeting a larger population from different geographical areas compared with a single-center study. The nomogram scores of individual disease-related risk factors can be calculated and used to predict prognosis. In recent years, gynecologists have begun to acknowledge it as an applicable tool [8, 9]. However, there is a lack of research on the construction of a visualized nomogram for MOGCTs. In this study, a nomogram was constructed to predict MOGCT survival using a cohort based on the SEER database of patients with MOGCT and correspondingly assess factors associated with OS.


Ethics statement

It is not compulsory to obtain informed consent from patients regarding the use of the SEER database as cancer cases are reported in all states in the United States. This study followed the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments or similar ethical standards. This retrospective study included MOGCT patients from 2008 to 2019 in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (Ethics Code: 2020PS814K).


Data of MOGCT patients registered between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the SEER database using SEER*Stat version The locus code was C56.9, and the histological code was 9060/3–9110/3, according to the International Classification of Tumor Diseases, 3rd Edition (ICD-O-3). The exclusion criteria included: (1) unrecorded Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, (2) unrecorded cause of death, (3) unrecorded tumor size, and (4) unrecorded specific surgical methods. The externally validated case cohort included a total of 121 MOGCT patients from 2008 to 2019 from the database of the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. A patient selection criteria flow chart is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of patient selection criteria

Data collection

Patient information was obtained from the SEER database, including patient ID, age, size of tumors, FIGO staging, laterality, histological subtype and grade, surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, survival time, survival status, and cause of death. X-tile software [10] was used to evaluate the suitable thresholds for patient age and tumor size (Fig. 2), which were 27 and 38 years and 130 mm and 175 mm, respectively. The duration from the beginning of treatment to death or the last follow-up appointment was considered as the OS.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The thresholds for age and tumor sizes were established by X-tile analysis. (A, B): The thresholds for age were 27 and 38 years; (C, D): The cutoff values for sizes of tumor were 130 mm and 175 mm

Statistical analysis

Optimal thresholds for tumor size and patient age were established using the X-tile software. The data was analyzed in the RStudio environment using R (version 3.6.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; To assess elements correlated with independent survival, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of our clinical data were conducted. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. To forecast the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS, nomograms were constructed using multivariate Cox analysis. The predictive ability of the nomogram was assessed according to the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with better recognition ability, with an AUC closer to 1.0 [11]. The concordance statistic [12] and Brier score [13] of the original and verified models were contrasted through internal validation by bootstrapping (1000 resampling). The overall income under each probable risk threshold was calculated using decision curve analysis (DCA) [14] and the clinical effect of the nomogram was evaluated. The recruited patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on the median of the total nomogram scores. Kaplan-Meier analysis [15] was used to estimate survival in the total population, FIGO stage I, II, and III patients. Statistically significant differences between the low- and high-risk groups were analyzed using the log-rank test.


Patient characteristics

Based on the standards of inclusion and exclusion, we collected data from the SEER database for 1401 of 1822 MOGCT patients registered between 2004 and 2015. The basic information of the recruited patients are shown in Table 1. The most common demographic characteristics included age less than 27 years (67.24%). The most common clinical characteristics of the patients included: FIGO stage I (68.81%), tumors located on only one side (96.29%), underwent local resection (51.68%) and chemotherapy (57.67%), but no radiotherapy (99.29%), and had histological subtypes of teratocarcinoma (55.03%).

Table 1 Characteristics with malignant ovarian germ cell tumor patients

Analysis of patient prognosis

The results of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of factors influencing OS are shown in Table 2. Overall, demographics of older age (≥ 39 years), and clinical parameters of FIGO IV, yolk sac tumor, histology grade IV, and no surgery were linked with an increased risk of death (P < 0.05).

Table 2 The univariable and multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival

Nomogram construction to predict OS

A nomogram of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was constructed using significant variables from the multivariate Cox regression analysis, including age, FIGO stage, histological subtype and grade, as well as the type of surgery. The nomogram revealed that histological grade, FIGO stage, and age had the greatest effect on OS, followed by histological subtype, type of surgery, and ethnicity (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The nomograms of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS)

Performance of nomogram for assessing OS

The nomogram including 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS had an AUC of more than 80% and had a higher predictive power than the nomogram with FIGO staging alone (Fig. 4). The DCA of the nomogram is shown in Fig. 5. The results suggest that the nomogram is more beneficial than the FIGO staging. The calibration curve after internal verification demonstrated that the perceived probability is consistent with the forecast of the nomograms, with all the calibration curves being close to the 45° line (Fig. 6). The Brier scores and C statistics before and after internal verification are presented in Table 3, and further indicate the congruence between the predicted probability and actual probability. The external validation results show that the nomograms were well-calibrated when predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS likelihoods (Fig. 7).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for overall survival (OS). A ROC curve for 1-year OS; (B) ROC curve for 3-year OS; (C) ROC curve for 5-year OS

Fig. 5
figure 5

The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve for overall survival (OS). A DCA curve for 1-year OS; (B) DCA curve for 3-year OS; (C) DCA curve for 5-year OS

Fig. 6
figure 6

Internal verification plots of nomogram calibration curves by bootstrapping with 1000 resamples. (A) 1-year overall survival (OS); (B) 3-year OS; (C) 5-year OS

Table 3 C-statistic and Breir score of nomograms
Fig. 7
figure 7

Calibration curve of nomogram in external validation cohort. A 1-year overall survival (OS); (B) 3-year OS; (C) 5-year OS

Survival analysis

Each patient had a calculated prognosis score based on different variables. The median prognosis score (133 points) was adopted as the critical value and was used to categorize patients into low- and high-risk groups. A considerable decrease in OS time was observed in the high-risk group in the general population (P < 0.05) and FIGO I patients (p < 0.05), indicating that the overall predictive capability of the model was acceptable. The function of the total prognosis score of FIGO II and III was not significant (P = 0.097 and P = 0.32, respectively), which may have been due to the small sample size of patients within these stages (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Kaplan-Meier survival curve for malignant ovarian germ cell tumor patients. (A) Overall; (B) FIGO Stage I; (C) FIGO Stage II; (D) FIGO Stage III


Main findings

Our study constructed a nomogram of OS for MOGCTs based on the SEER database. The nomogram can better predict OS of MOGCTs, and has better clinical benefits.

Strengths and limitations

Although our study was the first to generate a nomogram of MOGCT based on data from the SEER database, it has some limitations. First, more than 20% of the potential patients were excluded from the search, possibly because of selection bias. Second, due to limitations of the database, some factors affecting OS, such as molecular markers, were not used in the development of the nomograms [16, 17]. Third, factors such as different doses and durations of chemotherapy were not considered in the model. Finally, the sample size of the external validation queue of this model was small. Future research combining data from other centers to the model may comprehensively improve its validity with regard to predictions.


Although MOGCTs are depicted as highly malignant, rapidly growing, and large, the survival rate of patients has significantly improved because of the sensitivity of MOGCTs to platinum-based chemotherapy [18, 19]. A combination of tumor resection and platinum chemotherapy results in a five-year survival rate of nearly 90% of patients [20, 21]. However, the prognosis of disease relapse after chemotherapy remains poor, especially in patients with higher grades and higher stages of disease [22], making it important for clinicians to distinguish high-risk factors that influence prognosis. Therefore, the current study aimed to construct a more comprehensive prognostic model to improve the survival of patients with MOGCTs.

Currently, nomograms are widely used as prognostic tools for integrating demographic and clinical characteristics to predict tumor prognosis [23, 24]. However, no previous study has established a nomogram for the prognosis of MOGCT, probably because of the rarity of ovarian germ cell tumors. A nomogram using data available in the SEER database was designed in the present study, which includes clinically useful and readily available parameters, such as age, FIGO stage, histological subtypes, histological grade, and surgical modality. The nomogram has a better predictive power and clinical utility than the simple FIGO staging system using ROC and DCA analyses. Excellent consistency between the predicted and observed OS was observed through internal validation. Based on our findings, nomograms can be used to effectively assess prognoses of MOGCTs and provide individual references for the follow-up treatment of patients.

Due to the high incidence of MOGCT in young women and its sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy, it is reasonable to reduce the scope of surgery and preserve fertility, while still improving the cure rate. The effectiveness of comprehensive staging has generated strong deliberations. Hu et al. conducted a retrospective analysis of 137 patients admitted between 1991 and 2014 and found that after adjusting for stage, age, histology, and other risk factors, fertility preservation surgery did not affect the prognosis of patients with MOGCT [25]. Furthermore, in a study of 144 patients with MOGCTs, Mangili et al. showed that fertility preservation surgery was not significantly associated with disease outcomes [26]. However, other studies have contented against this. For instance, Lin et al. demonstrated that comprehensive surgical staging was associated with lower recurrence rates [27]. In the nomogram of our current study, the risk score was significantly increased for patients who have not undergone surgery, and the risk factor scores of debulking or cytoreductive surgery or pelvic exenteration were slightly higher compared to that of local resection. Therefore, surgical treatment is crucial for a positive prognosis. Compared with local resection, expanding the scope of surgery is not very beneficial for prognosis.

Current guidelines for adult women recommend that localized ovarian dysgerminoma and stage I teratocarcinoma require postoperative observation for management. Current guidelines recommend postoperative chemotherapy for all other histologic types, as well as for advanced disease [28]. However, the effectiveness of chemotherapy has been contested. For instance, Billmire et al. observed 56 patients with stage I MOGCT who received chemotherapy and 24 MOGCT patients who did not receive chemotherapy and found that the 5-year OS of both patient groups was 96%, suggesting that most patients are not indicated to undergo postoperative chemotherapy when diseases are diagnosed early [29]. Furthermore, Mangili et al. found no correlation between postoperative chemotherapy and recurrence in patients with teratocarcinoma through univariate analysis [5]. Our current study showed that chemotherapy was not associated with OS in patients with MOGCTs. However, due to the limitations of the SEER database, our study did not include specific chemotherapy regimens or chemotherapy duration. Thus, the results may be limited by bias and are inconclusive for specific chemotherapy regimens.


In summary, the nomogram of this study demonstrated better prognostic accuracy than that of the FIGO staging system and reliably predicted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS in patients with MOGCTs. This nomogram may prove to be a good predictive tool for gynecological clinical practice and help in the management of patients with MOGCTs.

Availability of data and materials

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: Additional data supporting the results of this study are available from Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, but their availability is limited and they were used with the permission of the current study, so they are not publicly available. However, data can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request and with the permission of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. If anyone would like to obtain data from this study, please contact Zixuan Song, the first author.



Malignant ovarian germ cell tumor


Overall survival


Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results


International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition


Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics


Area under receiver operating characteristic curves


Receiver operating characteristic


Decision curve analysis


Hazard ratios


Confidence intervals


  1. Poynter JN, Fonstad R, Tolar J, Spector LG, Ross JA. Incidence of intracranial germ cell tumors by race in the United States, 1992-2010. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;120(2):381–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurman RJ, International Agency for Research on Cancer., World Health Organization. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gershenson DM. Management of ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2938–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangili G, Sigismondi C, Gadducci A, Cormio G, Scollo P, Tateo S, et al. Outcome and risk factors for recurrence in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a MITO-9 retrospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(8):1414–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Newton C, Murali K, Ahmad A, Hockings H, Graham R, Liberale V, et al. A multicentre retrospective cohort study of ovarian germ cell tumours: evidence for chemotherapy de-escalation and alignment of paediatric and adult practice. Eur J Cancer. 2019;113:19–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. SEER Incidence Data, 1975-2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xie G, Wang R, Shang L, Qi C, Yang L, Huang L, et al. Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu L, Sun X, Bai W. Nomograms for predicting cancer-specific and overall survival among patients with endometrial carcinoma: a SEER based study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Janssens A, Martens FK. Reflection on modern methods: revisiting the area under the ROC curve. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(4):1397–403.

  12. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004;23(13):2109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roulston M. Performance targets and the brier score. Meteorol Appl. 2007;14(2):185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Calster B, Wynants L, Verbeek JFM, Verbakel JY, Christodoulou E, Vickers AJ, et al. Reporting and interpreting decision curve analysis: a guide for investigators. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abd ElHafeez S, Torino C, D'Arrigo G, Bolignano D, Provenzano F, Mattace-Raso F, et al. An overview on standard statistical methods for assessing exposure-outcome link in survival analysis (part II): the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the cox regression method. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(3):203–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He L, Ding H, Wang JH, Zhou Y, Li L, Yu YH, et al. Overexpression of karyopherin 2 in human ovarian malignant germ cell tumor correlates with poor prognosis. Plos One. 2012;7(9):e42992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rougemont AL, Tille JC. Role of HNF1beta in the differential diagnosis of yolk sac tumor from other germ cell tumors. Hum Pathol. 2018;81:26–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gershenson DM, Morris M, Cangir A, Kavanagh JJ, Stringer CA, Edwards CL, et al. Treatment of malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8(4):715–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee KH, Lee IH, Kim BG, Nam JH, Kim WK, Kang SB, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of malignant germ cell tumors in the ovaries of Korean women: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(1):84–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith HO, Berwick M, Verschraegen CF, Wiggins C, Lansing L, Muller CY, et al. Incidence and survival rates for female malignant germ cell tumors. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1075–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Solheim O, Kaern J, Trope CG, Rokkones E, Dahl AA, Nesland JM, et al. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: presentation, survival and second cancer in a population based Norwegian cohort (1953-2009). Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(2):330–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee YL, Lai CR, Yen MS. Recurrent ovarian mixed germ cell tumor with unusual malignant transformation: a case report. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu J, Zhang H, Li L, Hu M, Chen L, Xu B, et al. A nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a population-based analysis. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020;40(7):301–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. You D, Zhang Z, Cao M. Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for postoperative ovarian sex cord-stromal tumor patients. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e925844.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu T, Fang Y, Sun Q, Zhao H, Ma D, Zhu T, et al. Clinical management of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a 26-year experience in a tertiary care institution. Surg Oncol. 2019;31:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mangili G, Sigismondi C, Lorusso D, Cormio G, Candiani M, Scarfone G, et al. The role of staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTs): the MITO-9 study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(2):333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin KY, Bryant S, Miller DS, Kehoe SM, Richardson DL, Lea JS. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumor - role of surgical staging and gonadal dysgenesis. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(1):84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Veneris JT, Mahajan P, Frazier AL. Contemporary management of ovarian germ cell tumors and remaining controversies. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):467–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Billmire DF, Cullen JW, Rescorla FJ, Davis M, Schlatter MG, Olson TA, et al. Surveillance after initial surgery for pediatric and adolescent girls with stage I ovarian germ cell tumors: report from the Children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):465–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This research was supported by 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0946) and internal funding from Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University (SJ-M0133).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Research ideas: ZS, DZ. Data extraction: YW. Statistical analysis: YW, YZ: Drafted the manuscript: ZS, DZ. All authors take responsibility for appropriate content. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dandan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

It is not compulsory to obtain informed consent from patients regarding the use of the SEER database as cancer cases are reported in all states in the United States. This study followed the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments or similar ethical standards. This retrospective study included MOGCT patients from 2008 to 2019 in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (Ethics Code: 2020PS814K)..

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y. et al. Nomograms to predict the prognosis in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a large cohort study. BMC Cancer 22, 257 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: