Skip to main content
Download PDF

Statin use is associated with the reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver surgery

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 91 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common form of cancer worldwide. Although surgical treatments have an acceptable cure rate, tumor recurrence is still a challenging issue. In this meta-analysis, we investigated whether statins prevent HCC recurrence following liver surgery.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched. The Outcome of interest was the HCC recurrence after hepatic surgery. Pooled estimates were represented as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model. Summary effect measures are presented together with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

The literature search retrieved 1362 studies excluding duplicates. Nine retrospective studies including 44,219 patients (2243 in the statin group and 41,976 in the non-statin group) were included in the qualitative analysis. Patients who received statins had a lower rate of recurrence after liver surgery (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.44–0.63; p < 0.001). Moreover, Statins decreased the recurrence 1 year after surgery (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.16–0.47; P < 0.001), 3 years after surgery (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.15–0.33; P < 0.001), and 5 years after surgery (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.19–0.42; P < 0.001). The certainty of evidence for the outcomes was moderate.

Conclusion

Statins increase the disease-free survival of patients with HCC after liver surgery. These drugs seem to have chemoprevention effects that decrease the probability of HCC recurrence after liver transplantation or liver resection.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy [1] and is emerging as the fastest-growing fatal cancer in the United States with a rapidly rising mortality rate worldwide [2]. Establishing the best treatment option for HCC is difficult and depends on the tumor stage at the time of diagnosis [3]. Surgical or interventional curative approaches such as local ablation, surgical resection, and liver transplantation are the treatments of choice for tumors diagnosed in earlier stages [4,5,6]. However, detecting early-stage tumors is not feasible in many cases and only 13% of HCC cases are diagnosed early enough for curative therapy [7]. Although surgical procedures like tumor resection or liver transplantation have acceptable cure rates, they also have high recurrence rates [8, 9], with recurrence in more than 50% of patients after 5 years of surgery [10, 11]. Recurrence rates after transplantation are between 8 and 21% despite the use of new predictive models [12].

Both animal and human studies have shown an independent relationship between cholesterol levels and HCC progression [13]. HCC cell lines use cholesterol in their cell membranes and for organelle division [14] and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol have been associated with tumor aggressiveness [13]. Statins are hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and are commonly used to lower cholesterol levels in blood [15]. In addition, statins have immunomodulatory effects and can protect against cancer [16,17,18,19]. Several studies have attempted to investigate the possible role of statins in preventing HCC recurrence [20]. Early work showed that statins affect molecular pathways in HCC cell lines to prevent over-proliferation in vivo [21]. These anti-cancer effects make statins an interesting candidate for HCC prevention [14].

Recent studies have suggested that statins might increase survival rates in HCC patients and reduce HCC recurrence rates after curative treatment [22, 23]. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate the role of statins in preventing HCC recurrence after hepatic surgery.

Methods

The present study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recommendations of the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery [24, 25].

Eligibility criteria

The research question and eligibility criteria were formulated based on the PICOS strategy (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and design of studies).

  • ▪ Population: All patients with HCC who underwent hepatic surgery, including liver resection and liver transplantation

  • ▪ Intervention: Treatment with statins

  • ▪ Comparators: No statin treatment

  • ▪ Outcome: HCC recurrence after surgery

  • ▪ Study design: Any study design except case reports, study protocols, animal studies, conference papers, and letters to the editor.

To eliminate the risk of analyzing the same patients more than once, the studies were thoroughly assessed and double publications and overlapping reports were excluded. The remaining studies were selected for full-text review by reviewing the titles and abstracts for eligibility.

Literature search

The predefined search terms were: (“carcinoma, hepatocellular” OR “adenoma hepatocellular” OR “adenomas hepatocellular” OR “hepatocellular adenoma” OR “HCC” OR “hepatocellular carcinoma”) AND (“Statin” OR “Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors” OR “HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor”). Our comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central databases from their inception until February 2021. We also searched PubMed/Medline and Cochrane Central for systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials on surgical interventions. All studies comparing HCC recurrence in adult patients who underwent liver surgery were included.

Study selection

Two authors (ADM and PE) independently screened all titles and abstracts and made their selections according to PICOS eligibility criteria. The full texts of appropriate studies were evaluated and their data were extracted by two authors (SAHS and AR) independently. Discrepancies were resolved through discussions with the first and senior authors (EK and AM). For each treatment group, the following data were extracted: study characteristics, patient characteristics, study quality, and outcome measures.

Critical appraisal

The quality of each study was assessed by two independent reviewers (SAHA and AR) using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Quality was determined based on 12 MINORS items and was scored as follows: 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate) or 2 (reported and adequate). The best score was 24 for comparative studies. Studies with 20 points or lower were deemed high risk of bias, 21–23 points intermediate risk of bias, and 24 points low risk of bias. The overall quality of the evidence for each outcome was also assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by RevMan version 5.3 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). The effect size for dichotomous outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). For analyzing ORs and HRs of included studies, random effects model was used. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the I2 statistic. I2 values of 0–25% indicate insignificant heterogeneity, 26–50% indicate low heterogeneity, 51–75% indicate moderate heterogeneity, and 76–100% indicate high heterogeneity. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results

Literature search

The literature search retrieved 1362 studies after duplicates were excluded. Evaluation of titles and abstracts excluded a further 1297 articles. Of the 65 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 56 were excluded for various reasons, including insufficient data on survival. Finally, nine articles were included in the qualitative and eight articles in the quantitative meta-analysis (Fig. 1). All included studies were retrospective and reported on 44,219 patients (2243 in the statin group and 41,976 in the non-statin group). All studies were published between 2012 and 2021. The certainty of evidence for the outcomes, assessed using the GRADE approach, was moderate.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study

Full size image

Qualitative report

Of the nine included studies (Table 1), only Yang and Young studies [26, 27] classified their patient based on Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) Staging. In the young study, of the 430 participants, approximately 59% were in stage A, 36 in stage B, and the rest in stage C. Only patients with stage 0 or A were included in Yang study. Four studies [20, 23, 26, 28] had sufficient information regarding recurrence free survival in statin and no-statin groups. According to available data in included studies, we performed two separate meta-analyses of HRs and ORs. Wu LL study [22] was excluded from meta-analyses of HRs, because statin use was not reported separately in patients who underwent surgery.

Table 1 Included studies in qualitative analysis
Full size table

The quality assessment of included studies is shown in Table 2. All included studies had an overall MINORS score of less than 20, indicating a considerable risk of bias. All included studies had a high risk of biased assessment of the study endpoint because they were non-randomized and non-blinded. In addition, all included studies were retrospective so did not prospectively calculate the sample size.

Table 2 Assessment of the quality of studies included in qualitative and quantitative analyses
Full size table

Quantitative analysis

In 8 studies with totally 25,327 participants, association between statin use and HCC recurrence was reported as HRs. After pooling of HRs of HCC recurrence using a random-effect model, the rate of recurrence was significantly lower in patients who received statins before their surgery (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.44–0.63; p < 0.001; Fig. 2). No significant heterogeneity was seen between the studies in this regard (I2 = 34%; P = 0.16).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pooled analysis of hazard ratios for recurrence of HCC

Full size image

HCC recurrence after surgery was reported in 2544 patients from four studies (232 patients in the statin group and 2312 patients in the non-statin group). HCC recurrence 1 year after surgery occurred in 16 patients (6.89%) in the statin group and in 663 patients (28.67%) in the non-statin group. Meta-analysis indicated that statin use decreased HCC recurrence 1 year after surgery (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.16–0.47; p < 0.001; Fig. 3) using a random-effects model. There was no considerable heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.39).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot for HCC recurrence 1 year after liver surgery

Full size image

HCC recurrence 3 years after surgery was reported in 31 patients (13.3%) in the statin group and in 1159 patients (50.1%) in the non-statin group. Meta-analysis indicated that statin use decreased HCC recurrence 3 years after surgery (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.15–0.33; p < 0.001; Fig. 4) using a random-effects model. There was no considerable heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.56).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot for HCC recurrence 3 years after liver surgery

Full size image

HCC recurrence 5 years after surgery was reported in 49 patients (20.9%) in the statin group and in 1360 patients (58.8%) in the non-statin group. Meta-analysis indicated that statin use decreased HCC recurrence 5 years after surgery (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.19–0.42; p < 0.001; Fig. 5) using a random-effects model. There was no considerable heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 18%; p = 0.30).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot for HCC recurrence 5 years after liver surgery

Full size image

Discussion

HCC comprises more than 80% of primary liver cancers [32] and is the third most deadly cancer worldwide. In Europe, it is the seventh leading cause of death [33, 34]. In the recent years, the etiology and characteristics of HCC patients is widely changed. New radiological methods in the diagnosis of HCC patients and differentiating primary and recurrent nodules have been introduced [35]. In addition, proper surveillance programs are performed around the world that help to identify patients in the lower stages of the disease and enable early treatment of the patients [36]. The OS of patients is higher if the diagnosis is made early [9], but high HCC recurrence rates after surgical treatment still remain a big challenge [12, 37]. New methods are urgently needed to reduce recurrence, thereby improving long-term surgical outcomes and reducing healthcare-related costs in the future.

Because of the virulent character of HCC, prevention plays a significant role in treatment [38]. Different studies have investigated the protective effect of several drugs against HCC recurrence, including statins, aspirin, and anti-diabetic agents [8]. Statins are classified into lipophilic and hydrophilic statins and have been used extensively to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases [39, 40]. Studies have recently demonstrated that statins can reduce the risk of many cancers, including liver cancers [39, 41]. Furthermore, statins can inhibit progression of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in HCC patients [42] and can reduce the risk of HCC in patients with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection and also with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [43, 44]. Lipophilic statins seem to be more effective at preventing HCC than hydrophilic statins are [39]. Fluvastatin has been revealed as the most effective drug in reducing HCC risk [8].

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated whether statins can reduce HCC recurrence following liver surgery. We showed that the recurrence was lower at one, three, and 5 years after surgery in patients with HCC who underwent liver surgery in combination with statin treatment than in patients who underwent liver surgery without statin treatment. These results indicate that statins should be considered effective at reducing the recurrence of HCC tumors.

Statins may reduce the risk of cancer via several mechanisms, including inhibiting oncogenic pathways, promoting tumor-specific apoptosis, inhibiting the proteasome pathway, inhibiting hepatitis virus replication, and reducing cholesterol synthesis [45, 46]. Statins can also decrease endothelial dysfunction, intrahepatic vasoconstriction, inflammation, and fibrosis [47,48,49]. The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of statins allow them to inhibit harmful inflammatory and immunologic responses that may promote cancer [47,48,49]. The effect of statins on liver regeneration and ischemia-reperfusion injury after extensive hepatectomy has been investigated in animal models. These studies showed that these drugs can improve outcomes by facilitating regeneration and by inhibiting the harmful inflammatory response [50, 51]. In a pilot clinical study, preoperative oral atorvastatin therapy for 3 days prior to liver resection reduced the harmful immunologic and inflammatory responses due to ischemia-reperfusion injury [52].

Patients who are not eligible for liver resection can be treated with more conservative options [22]. Wu et al. [22] reported that combining statin treatment with these conservative methods improves the survival of patients with advanced HCC. In patients with a contraindication for these conservative therapies, especially those with HBV/HCV, palliative treatment with statins can reduce the mortality rate [22]. It seems that combining statins and conservative therapies in patients who cannot undergo surgical therapies can improve the HCC prognosis [22, 53]. According to Aaron et al., statins can improve the survival of HCC patients when administered both before or after HCC is diagnosed [54].

HCC recurrence is detected in half of patients 3 years after liver surgery [55]. Recurrent disease is not easily treatable, so it is important to prevent recurrence after resection [20]. Studies have shown that statins can reduce HCC recurrence rate by reducing viremia in patients with HBV and HCV. Possible mechanisms include reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum [8, 56, 57], reducing the virulent potency of viral infections [20, 57], or inhibiting cirrhotic progression [57]. However, the type of antiviral regimen can also affect the recurrence risk and survival of HCV-related HCC and need to be evaluated in further studied on statins [58].

Preventing HCC recurrence after liver transplantation is also an important issue [59] but has not been well investigated. Statins have several side-effects (including myalgia and myotoxicity that may lead to rhabdomyolysis), especially when administered at high doses. These side-effects need to be properly investigated in post-transplant patients [60, 61]. The prevalence of post-liver transplant dyslipidemia is 16–66% worldwide [47]. Statins decrease lipidemia in patients after liver transplantation, thereby preventing cardiovascular events [60].

There are some limitations to the present systematic review and meta-analysis. First, all of included studies are from Asia-pacific area and it have been mentioned as a limitation of the present study, that can affect the results of this study. Moreover, we found no RCT that compared the clinical outcomes of liver surgery between statin and non-statin groups. Furthermore, the timing, dosage, and type of statin is important to evaluate the outcomes; however, this information was not provided in every study. Further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to determine whether statin therapy prevents HCC recurrence after liver resection or transplantation.

In conclusion, statins increased disease-free survival of patients with HCC after liver surgery. They may reduce HCC recurrence after liver surgery by chemoprevention effects. Unfortunately, the existing evidence is still too limited (small study populations, retrospective study designs, and single-center studies) to confirm a role for statins in reducing disease recurrence in HCC patients. Further randomized clinical trials should confirm the effectiveness of statins in preventing HCC recurrence after liver surgery, and should determine the importance of different types of surgery and types of statins.

Availability of data and materials

Only publicly available data were used in this study, and data sources and handling of these.

data are described in the Materials and Methods and in the additional files.

Further information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

GRADE:

Grades of Research, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

HCC:

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

HCV:

Hepatitis C Virus

HMG-CoA:

Hydroxy-Methyl Glutaryl Coenzyme A

HR:

Hazard Ratio

MINORS:

Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

OR:

Odds Ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

References

  1. El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(6):1264–73.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mokdad AH, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Fitzmaurice C, Stubbs RW, Bertozzi-Villa A, Morozoff C, et al. Trends and patterns of disparities in Cancer mortality among US counties, 1980-2014. Jama. 2017;317(4):388–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Akamatsu N, Cillo U, Cucchetti A, Donadon M, Pinna AD, Torzilli G, et al. Surgery and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2017;6(1):44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belghiti J, Kianmanesh R. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB. 2005;7(1):42–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho MC, Hasegawa K, Chen XP, Nagano H, Lee YJ, Chau GY, et al. Surgery for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a consensus report from the 5th Asia-Pacific primary liver cancer expert meeting (APPLE 2014). Liver Cancer. 2016;5(4):245–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahbari NN, Mehrabi A, Mollberg NM, Müller SA, Koch M, Büchler MW, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and perspectives for the future. Ann Surg. 2011;253(3):453–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Serag HB, Siegel AB, Davila JA, Shaib YH, Cayton-Woody M, McBride R, et al. Treatment and outcomes of treating of hepatocellular carcinoma among Medicare recipients in the United States: a population-based study. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):158–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara N, Friedman SL, Goossens N, Hoshida Y. Risk factors and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of precision medicine. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):526–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang JH, Wang CC, Hung CH, Chen CL, Lu SN. Survival comparison between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for patients in BCLC very early/early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56(2):412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Saeedi M, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, Shafiei S, Salehpour R, Golriz M, et al. Pringle maneuver in extended liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Khajeh E, Shafiei S, Al-Saegh SA, Ramouz A, Hammad A, Ghamarnejad O, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of the Pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bodzin AS. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and what to do when it happens. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(6):503–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Carr BI, Giannelli G, Guerra V, Giannini EG, Farinati F, Rapaccini GL, et al. Plasma cholesterol and lipoprotein levels in relation to tumor aggressiveness and survival in HCC patients. Int J Biol Markers. 2018;33(4):423–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan DE. Statins and hepatocellular carcinoma protection. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2019;15(4):190–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramkumar S, Raghunath A, Raghunath S. Statin therapy: review of safety and potential side effects. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32(6):631–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Wyhe RD, Rahal OM, Woodward WA. Effect of statins on breast cancer recurrence and mortality: a review. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017;9:559–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stryjkowska-Gora A, Karczmarek-Borowska B, Gora T, Krawczak K. Statins and cancers. Contemp Oncol (Poznan, Poland). 2015;19(3):167–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1792–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Demierre MF, Higgins PD, Gruber SB, Hawk E, Lippman SM. Statins and cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(12):930–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawaguchi Y, Sakamoto Y, Ito D, Ito K, Arita J, Akamatsu N, et al. Statin use is associated with a reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after initial liver resection. Biosci Trends. 2017;11(5):574–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mullen PJ, Yu R, Longo J, Archer MC, Penn LZ. The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(11):718–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu LL, Hsieh MC, Chow JM, Liu SH, Chang CL, Wu SY. Statins improve outcomes of nonsurgical curative treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Medicine. 2016;95(36):e4639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho Y, Kim MS, Nam CM, Kang ES. Statin use is associated with decreased hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalkum E, Klotz R, Seide S, Hüttner FJ, Kowalewski KF, Nickel F, et al. Systematic reviews in surgery-recommendations from the study Center of the German Society of surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2021;406(6):1723–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang SY, Wang CC, Chen KD, Liu YW, Lin CC, Chuang CH, et al. Statin use is associated with a lower risk of recurrence after curative resection in BCLC stage 0-a hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Young SH, Chau GY, Lee IC, Yeh YC, Chao Y, Huo TI, et al. Aspirin is associated with low recurrent risk in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative resection. J Formosan Med Assoc = Taiwan yi zhi. 2020;119(1 Pt 2):218–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishio T, Taura K, Nakamura N, Seo S, Yasuchika K, Kaido T, et al. Impact of statin use on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection: a subgroup analysis of patients without chronic hepatitis viral infection. Surgery. 2018;163(2):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee PC, Yeh CM, Hu YW, Chen CC, Liu CJ, Su CW, et al. Antiplatelet therapy is associated with a better prognosis for patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 5):874–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yeh CC, Lin JT, Jeng LB, Ho HJ, Yang HR, Wu MS, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with reduced risk of early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative liver resection: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu CY, Chen YJ, Ho HJ, Hsu YC, Kuo KN, Wu MS, et al. Association between nucleoside analogues and risk of hepatitis B virus–related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver resection. Jama. 2012;308(18):1906–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yuen MF, Hou JL, Chutaputti A. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(3):346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leoni S, Piscaglia F, Granito A, Borghi A, Galassi M, Marinelli S, et al. Characterization of primary and recurrent nodules in liver cirrhosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: which vascular criteria should be adopted? Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(03):280–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bucci L, Garuti F, Lenzi B, Pecorelli A, Farinati F, Giannini EG, et al. The evolutionary scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: an update. Liver Int. 2017;37(2):259–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang Z, Miao R, Li G, Wu Y, Robson SC, Yang X, et al. Identification of recurrence related microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(1):1105–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim G, Jang SY, Nam CM, Kang ES. Statin use and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients at high risk: a nationwide nested case-control study. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):476–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi M, Zheng H, Nie B, Gong W, Cui X. Statin use and risk of liver cancer: an update meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Björkhem-Bergman L, Backheden M, Söderberg LK. Statin treatment reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma but not colon cancer—results from a nationwide case-control study in Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23(10):1101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li Z, Li Y, Li X, Zhang L, Zhao N, Du H, et al. Statins on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in hepatitis B or C patients protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(34):e11950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaplan DE, Serper MA, Mehta R, Fox R, John B, Aytaman A, et al. Effects of hypercholesterolemia and statin exposure on survival in a large National Cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):1693–706.e12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tsan YT, Lee CH, Ho WC, Lin MH, Wang JD, Chen PC. Statins and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1514–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hajifathalian K, Tafesh Z, Rosenblatt R, Kumar S, Homan EA, Sharaiha RZ, et al. Effect of statin use on Cancer-related mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective United States cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001503.

  45. Higashi T, Hayashi H, Kitano Y, Yamamura K, Kaida T, Arima K, et al. Statin attenuates cell proliferative ability via TAZ (WWTR1) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England). 2016;33(11):123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chiu HF, Ho SC, Chen CC, Yang CY. Statin use and the risk of liver cancer: a population-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(5):894–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gazi IF, Liberopoulos EN, Athyros VG, Elisaf M, Mikhailidis DP. Statins and solid organ transplantation. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(36):4771–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Greenwood J, Mason JC. Statins and the vascular endothelial inflammatory response. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(2):88–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dulak J, Józkowicz A. Anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects of statins: relevance to anti-cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2005;5(8):579–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Colakoglu T, Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Kayaselcuk F, Parlakgumus A, Belli S, et al. Effects of different doses of statins on liver regeneration through angiogenesis and possible relation between these effects and acute phase responses. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(9):3823–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tokunaga T, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Imura S, Morine Y, Shinohara H, et al. Beneficial effects of fluvastatin on liver microcirculation and regeneration after massive hepatectomy in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(11):2989–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sarin S, Kaman L, Dahiya D, Behera A, Medhi B, Chawla Y. Effects of preoperative statin on liver reperfusion injury in major hepatic resection: a pilot study. Updat Surg. 2016;68(2):191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shao JY, Lee FP, Chang CL, Wu SY. Statin-based palliative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine. 2015;94(42):e1801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Thrift AP, Natarajan Y, Liu Y, El-Serag HB. Statin use after diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with decreased mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(10):2117–25.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function: implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation. Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):373–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Singh S, Singh PP. Statins for prevention of hepatocellular cancer: one step closer? Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2014;59(2):724–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Janicko M, Drazilova S, Pella D, Fedacko J, Jarcuska P. Pleiotropic effects of statins in the diseases of the liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(27):6201–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cabibbo G, Petta S, Barbàra M, Missale G, Virdone R, Caturelli E, et al. A meta-analysis of single HCV-untreated arm of studies evaluating outcomes after curative treatments of HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2017;37(8):1157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Siegel AB, El-Serag HB. Statins for chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessing the evidence. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;7(6):493–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bjorkhem-Bergman L. Is there a role for statins in palliative care for patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma? J Palliat Care. 2015;31(3):172–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Muck W, Neal DA, Boix O, Voith B, Hasan R, Alexander GJ. Tacrolimus/cerivastatin interaction study in liver transplant recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(2):213–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was funded by the Champalimaud Clinical Centre of the Champalimaud Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Elias Khajeh, Arash Dooghaie Moghadam, Pegah Eslami, Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Ali Ramouz, Saeed Shafiei, Omid Ghamarnejad, Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli, Pascal Probst, Seyed Mostafa Mousavizadeh & Arianeb Mehrabi

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Christian Rupp

  3. Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg, Germany

    Christian Rupp, Christoph Springfeld & Arianeb Mehrabi

  4. Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany

    Christoph Springfeld

  5. Digestive Unit, Clinical Oncology, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Lisboa, Portugal

    Carlos Carvalho

Authors
  1. Elias Khajeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arash Dooghaie Moghadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pegah Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Ramouz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Saeed Shafiei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Omid Ghamarnejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christian Rupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christoph Springfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Carlos Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Pascal Probst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Seyed Mostafa Mousavizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Arianeb Mehrabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.M. and E.K. contributed to the conception of study. A.D.M., P.E., S.A.H.S., and A.R. conducted the literature search. E.K., S.A.H.S. and A.R. analyzed the data and interpreted data. A.D.M., P.E., O.G., S.S., and S.M.M. drafted the manuscript, which E.K. A.M., C.R., C.S., C.C. and P.P. critically revised. All authors gave final approval of the article to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianeb Mehrabi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khajeh, E., Moghadam, A.D., Eslami, P. et al. Statin use is associated with the reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver surgery. BMC Cancer 22, 91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09192-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09192-1

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us