Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of C5aR in human solid tumors: a Meta-analysis

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 1136 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

C5aR has been extensively studied in recent years as an essential component of the complement system. However, the role of C5aR in tumors has not been sufficiently investigated and summarized. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of C5aR in solid tumors as well as the correlation between C5aR and clinicopathological features.

Methods

Relevant study collection was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, Cochrane Library until July 10, 2021. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of this study, while publication bias was tested by Begg’s and Egger’s tests.

Results

A total of 11 studies involving 1577 patients were included in the study. Our results suggest that the high-level C5aR expression in tumor tissue predicted unsatisfactory overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.92, 95% CI:1.47–2.50, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.47–3.27, P < 0.001). Besides, a higher level of C5aR expression was associated with larger tumor size (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18–2.10, P = 0.002) and the occurrence of metastases in lymph nodes (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46–2.72, P<0.001), whereas it was independent of tumor stage, vascular invasion and tumor differentiation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, C5aR may be a potential biomarker for evaluating tumor prognosis and treatment.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cancers have become a major global public health problem, bringing a heavy burden to society. In 2020, there were approximately 19.3 million new cancer cases and 10.0 million cancer deaths worldwide [1]. The treatment of cancers has come a long way from the traditional surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy to the recently developed immune checkpoint therapy [2]. Frustratingly, despite enormous progress being made in terms of cancer treatment, cancers are still the leading cause of death. Meanwhile, we also noted that cancer treatment is highly varied among individuals and that the prognosis varies significantly from one individual to another [3]. Therefore, in the background of personalized cancer treatment and assessment, a biomarker capable of predicting the clinicopathological features and prognosis of cancers is desired.

The complement system plays an essential role in immune regulation as it is involved in the pathological processes of inflammation and immune diseases as well as in the adaptive immune response, in addition to being involved in host defense mechanisms [4]. The complement component C5a is a potent pro-inflammatory factor that is associated with a wide range of diseases [5, 6]. C5a can bind two receptors, known as C5aR (CD88) and C5L2 (GPR77). C5aR is expressed at substantially higher levels on immune and non-immune cells than C5L2, and it is now thought that C5a exerts its functional effects mainly through C5aR [7]. Upregulation of C5aR expression has been proven to be implicated in the progression of many immune and inflammatory diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus [8], inflammatory bowel diseases [9], sepsis [10], and respiratory distress syndrome [11]. Furthermore, C5aR was reported to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [12,13,14], gastric cancer (GC) [15, 16], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [17], urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) [18], prostate cancer (PC) [19], renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [20, 21], and breast cancer (BC) [22]. However, the prognostic value of C5aR in cancers has not been fully elucidated.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of C5aR in solid tumors as well as the correlation between C5aR and clinicopathological features.

Methods

Search strategy

Our study was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [23] and has been registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number, CRD42020191587). The PRISMA checklist is shown in Table S1. A total of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, Cochrane Library) were available for searching the literature, updated to July 10, 2021. The keywords used in the search were: (“C5aR” OR “C5a Receptor” OR “complement component C5a Receptor” OR “CD88”) AND (“neoplasms” OR “cancer” OR “tumor” OR “carcinoma” OR “leukemia” OR “lymphoma”). Moreover, references of retrieved articles were manually screened for including potential eligible literature.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Literature was considered eligible when it fulfilled the following criteria: (1) Articles investigated the correlation of C5aR expression with patient prognosis and/or tumor clinicopathological features. (2) C5aR expression was measured and cancer patients were classified into high and low expression groups. (3) Articles provided HRs, ORs, and 95% CIs, or provided sufficient data to calculate them. (4) Articles were published in English. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Duplicated publications. (2) Reviews, case reports, letters, conference abstracts. (3) Related studies were conducted in cell lines or at the animal level. (4) Insufficient data to calculate effect sizes.

Data extract

Three investigators (ZRW, WWY and YWQ) screened the literature and extracted data from it independently, with any discrepancies resolved by consultation. Relevant data extracted include name of the first author, date of publication, country, tumor type, sample size, detection method, clinicopathological characteristics, OS, RFS, and 95% CI. If the prognostic data were presented as a Kaplan-Meier curve only, the Engauge Digitizer (version 4.1) software was used to calculate the HR and 95% CI as described [24].

Quality assessment

The quality of the included literature was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria [25]. NOS scores are assigned on a scale of 0–9, with studies scoring≥6 being considered to be of high quality.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). OS and RFS were assessed by pooled HRs and 95% CIs. Clinicopathological features were assessed by pooled ORs and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity of all enrolled literature was assessed using χ2-based Q test and I2 statistics. A fixed-effects model was used where there was no heterogeneity (P > 0.1 and I2 < 50%), otherwise a random-effects model would have been applied. Funnel plots were used to estimate publication bias by visual inspection, and Begg’s and Egger’s tests were used to assess publication bias quantitatively, with P < 0.05 considered to be the presence of publication bias. Robustness of the meta-analysis was determined by removing studies one by one.

Results

Literature information

As depicted in Fig. 1, a total of 4482 records were retrieved by searching five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, Cochrane Library). After removing duplicate papers, 3926 records remained. Furthermore, 182 studies were eligible for initial screening based on title and abstract. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria we established, 128 irrelevant studies were excluded. The remaining 54 studies were reviewed for full text, with the final 11 studies meeting the requirements.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the literature search in this meta-analysis

Full size image

Study characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the included studies were summarized in Table S2. These 11 studies comprised a total of 1577 patients from 2013 to 2020. Almost all of these studies came from China or Japan, while only one study came from Spain. Cancer Type contains NSCLC, GC, HCC, UCC, PC, RCC and BC. Seven articles investigated the relationship between C5aR expression and OS, including a total of 1026 patients. Besides, four articles containing 666 cases studied the correlation between C5aR expression and RFS. Ten studies with a total of 1502 patients focused on the correlation between C5aR expression and clinicopathological features. All eligible papers have a high quality with NOS scores in the range of 7–9.

C5aR expression and OS

Seven studies were conducted to explore the relationship between C5aR and prognosis in terms of OS, with detailed information in Table 1. Since there was no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.677), the fixed-effects model was used to pool the data. The pooled results indicate that higher C5aR expression was associated with a poorer prognosis (HR = 1.92, 95% CI:1.47–2.50, P < 0.001). The forest plot was shown in Fig. 2A.

Table 1 Characteristics of eligible studies for prognosis
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of studies evaluating the associations between the C5aR expression levels and prognostic indicators. A, overall survival (OS); B, recurrence-free survival (RFS)

Full size image

C5aR expression and RFS

Four studies assessed RFS in patients with different levels of C5aR expression (Table 1). We used a fixed-effects model due to the lack of heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.610). As illustrated in Fig. 2B, a higher level of C5aR predicted that the patient had an undesirable RFS. (HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.47–3.27, P < 0.001).

C5aR expression and clinicopathological features

We systematically investigated the correlation between C5aR expression and clinicopathological features, including tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, vascular invasion and differentiation. The results were summarized in Tables 2 and 3. We found that a higher C5aR level was positively correlated with tumor size (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.18–2.10, P = 0.002) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.46–2.72, P<0.001) (Fig. S1). However, C5aR expression did not show a significant correlation with tumor stage (OR = 1.47, 95%CI: 0.93–2.34, P = 0.102), vascular invasion (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 0.55–5.01, P = 0.368) and tumor differentiation (OR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.74–1.62, P = 0.646). We noted that for tumor stage, there was a large heterogeneity (I2 = 65.5%, P = 0.002). Therefore, we implemented the subgroup analysis based on sample size and the results showed that for sample size≥100, higher C5aR expression was more prone to develop advanced tumor stage (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.30–2.71, P = 0.001) with a low heterogeneity (I2 = 39.5%, P = 0.116) (Fig. S1). However, for the two studies with sample size<100, the combined data reached the opposite conclusion (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.18–0.81, P = 0.924) with heterogeneity. Thus, sample size may be a source of heterogeneity.

Table 2 Characteristics of eligible studies for clinicopathological features
Full size table
Table 3 Meta-analysis results for C5aR expression with clinicopathological features
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis was performed to check the stability of the results by removing the studies one by one. As shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. S2, removing either study did not have a dramatic effect on the pooled values of OS, RFS and clinicopathological characteristics.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sensitivity analysis of studies evaluating the associations between the C5aR expression levels and prognostic indicators. A, overall survival (OS); B, recurrence-free survival (RFS)

Full size image

Publication Bias

Both the Begg’s and Egger’s tests were used to assess potential publication bias. The results show that the P value>0.05 for OS, RFS and clinicopathological characteristics (Table 4), implying that there was no publication bias in this meta-analysis. Besides, the large symmetry of the funnel plot from a visual perspective again validated the absence of publication bias (Fig. 4 and Fig. S3).

Table 4 Summary of publication bias tests in this meta-analysis
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Funnel plot for publication bias in this meta-analysis. A, overall survival (OS); B, recurrence-free survival (RFS)

Full size image

Discussion

C5aR has garnered rising interests in recent years as an important component of the immune regulatory system. In sepsis, excessive activation of C5a-C5aR signaling leads to functional paralysis of neutrophils, and blocking C5a or C5aR can effectively improve survival in septic patients [26]. Inhibition of the activation of the C5a-C5aR signaling pathway can inhibit the inflammatory response early and thus reverse the transition from acute kidney injury to renal failure [27]. Notably, therapy targeting C5aR in non-immune cells can reduce inflammation and tissue damage in the lung, bringing a new light to the treatment of COVID-19 [28]. A variety of inhibitors targeting C5aR have been proven to reduce the detrimental effects of inflammatory diseases [29, 30]. Unfortunately, the role of C5aR in cancers has not been systematically studied and summarized. In our previous study, we demonstrated that the S component of Panton-Valentine leucocidin (LukS-PV) can effectively inhibit the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma cells with a higher expression of C5aR, revealing that C5aR may be an important target for cancer therapy [31].

In this meta-analysis, we comprehensively investigated the correlation between C5aR expression and solid tumors prognosis as well as clinicopathological features. Our results suggest that the high-level C5aR expression in tumor tissue predicted unsatisfactory OS (HR = 1.92, 95% CI:1.47–2.50, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.47–3.27, P < 0.001). Hence, C5aR may be an excellent indicator for evaluating tumor prognosis. Subsequently, a higher level of C5aR expression was associated with larger tumor size (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.18–2.10, P = 0.002) and the occurrence of metastases in lymph nodes (OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.46–2.72, P<0.001), whereas it was independent of tumor stage, vascular invasion and tumor differentiation. Intriguingly, there was an apparent heterogeneity in the analysis of tumor stage, but subgroup analysis based on sample size drew the contrary conclusions. It can thus be seen that the sample size was determinant for the final conclusions. In the future, more studies with larger samples would be helpful to further clarify the relationship between C5aR and tumor stage.

In terms of mechanism, a growing body of evidence highlights the crucial role of C5aR in tumor progression. It has been reported that blocking C5aR inhibited the progression of breast cancer through the p38/p21 signaling axis [32] . Hu et al. reported that C5aR promoted hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis through ERK1/2-mediated epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) [17]. In addition, the administration of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies enabled the hyperactivation of the C5a-C5aR pathway, PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies combined with C5aR blockade therapy could achieve a satisfactory anti-tumor effect [33]. C5aR can also facilitate tumor metastasis by suppressing the response of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the lung, possibly driven by the recruitment of immature myeloid cells to the lungs and the production of large amounts of TGF-β and IL10 [34]. Given the interactive role of C5aR in cancer signaling pathways and tumor immunity, therapies targeting C5aR are promising directions to be developed in the future.

Certainly, there were some limitations to this study. Firstly, our study should be regarded as preliminary because a small number of articles included in this meta-analysis, especially regarding prognosis. In addition, inadequate data may limit the accuracy and validity of the conclusions of this study. We also look forward to more high-quality studies involving the assessment of prognostic and clinicopathological features of C5aR in cancers. Secondly, some of the studies only had survival curves as an indicator of prognosis, and we had to use software to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals, which may have deviated from the true values. Thirdly, almost all of the patients included in the study were from China and Japan, and studies covering other countries and races were scarce. Finally, studies on the treatment analysis with C5aR expression were missing.

Conclusion

In summary, our meta-analysis reveals that a higher level of C5aR expression was associated with poorer prognosis, larger tumor size and the development of lymph node metastases. Therefore, C5aR may be a potential biomarker for evaluating tumor prognosis and treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

C5aR:

C5a receptor

OS:

Overall survival

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

HR:

Hazard ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

NSCLC:

non-small cell lung cancer

GC:

gastric cancer

HCC:

hepatocellular carcinoma

UCC:

urothelial cell carcinoma

RCC:

renal cell carcinoma

BC:

breast cancer

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galluzzi L, Humeau J, Buqué A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(12):725–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson SE, Chester JD. Personalised cancer medicine. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(2):262–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng Q, Li K, Sacks SH, Zhou W. The role of anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a in regulating innate and adaptive immune responses. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009;8(3):236–46. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152809788681038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward PA. The harmful role of c5a on innate immunity in sepsis. J Innate Immun. 2010;2(5):439–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000317194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Karasu E, Demmelmaier J, Kellermann S, Holzmann K, Köhl J, Schmidt CQ, et al. Complement C5a induces pro-inflammatory microvesicle shedding in severely injured patients. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee H, Whitfeld PL, Mackay CR. Receptors for complement C5a. The importance of C5aR and the enigmatic role of C5L2. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86(2):153–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.icb.7100166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopkins P, Belmont HM, Buyon J, Philips M, Weissmann G, Abramson SB. Increased levels of plasma anaphylatoxins in systemic lupus erythematosus predict flares of the disease and may elicit vascular injury in lupus cerebritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(5):632–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780310508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodruff TM, Arumugam TV, Shiels IA, Reid RC, Fairlie DP, Taylor SM. A potent human C5a receptor antagonist protects against disease pathology in a rat model of inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol. 2003;171(10):5514–20. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.5514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber-Lang MS, Younkin EM, Sarma JV, McGuire SR, Lu KT, Guo RF, et al. Complement-induced impairment of innate immunity during sepsis. J Immunol. 2002;169(6):3223–31. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarma VJ, Huber-Lang M, Ward PA. Complement in lung disease. Autoimmunity. 2006;39(5):387–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916930600739456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ajona D, Zandueta C, Corrales L, Moreno H, Pajares MJ, Ortiz-Espinosa S, et al. Blockade of the complement C5a/C5aR1 Axis impairs lung Cancer bone metastasis by CXCL16-mediated effects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(9):1164–76. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201703-0660OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao C, Li Y, Qiu W, He F, Zhang W, Zhao D, et al. C5a induces A549 cell proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer via GDF15 gene activation mediated by GCN5-dependent KLF5 acetylation. Oncogene. 2018;37(35):4821–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0298-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu J, Ding JY, Lu CL, Lin ZW, Chu YW, Zhao GY, et al. Overexpression of CD88 predicts poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013;81(2):259–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaida T, Nitta H, Kitano Y, Yamamura K, Arima K, Izumi D, et al. C5a receptor (CD88) promotes motility and invasiveness of gastric cancer by activating RhoA. Oncotarget. 2016;7(51):84798–809. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nitta H, Shimose T, Emi Y, Imamura T, Ohnishi K, Kusumoto T, et al. Expression of the anaphylatoxin C5a receptor in gastric cancer: implications for vascular invasion and patient outcomes. Med Oncol. 2016;33(11):118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0834-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu WH, Hu Z, Shen X, Dong LY, Zhou WZ, Yu XX. C5a receptor enhances hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasiveness via activating ERK1/2-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Exp Mol Pathol. 2016;100(1):101–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wada Y, Maeda Y, Kubo T, Kikuchi K, Eto M, Imamura T. C5a receptor expression is associated with poor prognosis in urothelial cell carcinoma patients treated with radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(5):3995–4000. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Imamura R, Kitagawa S, Kubo T, Irie A, Kariu T, Yoneda M, et al. Prostate cancer C5a receptor expression and augmentation of cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and PD-L1 expression by C5a. Prostate. 2021;81(3):147–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeda Y, Kawano Y, Wada Y, Yatsuda J, Motoshima T, Murakami Y, et al. C5aR is frequently expressed in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and plays a crucial role in cell invasion via the ERK and PI3 kinase pathways. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(4):1844–50. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.3800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xi W, Liu L, Wang J, Xia Y, Bai Q, Xiong Y, et al. Enrichment of C5a-C5aR axis predicts poor postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(49):80925–34. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Imamura T, Yamamoto-Ibusuki M, Sueta A, Kubo T, Irie A, Kikuchi K, et al. Influence of the C5a-C5a receptor system on breast cancer progression and patient prognosis. Breast Cancer. 2016;23(6):876–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0654-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo RF, Riedemann NC, Ward PA. Role of C5a-C5aR interaction in sepsis. Shock. 2004;21(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000105502.75189.5e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang M, Zhang K, Li Y, He QH, Li GQ, Zheng QY, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate acute kidney injury by down-regulating C5a/C5aR pathway activation. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(8):1545–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1844-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Posch W, Vosper J, Noureen A, Zaderer V, Witting C, Bertacchi G, et al. C5aR inhibition of nonimmune cells suppresses inflammation and maintains epithelial integrity in SARS-CoV-2-infected primary human airway epithelia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(6):2083–2097.e2086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brandolini L, Grannonico M, Bianchini G, Colanardi A, Sebastiani P, Paladini A, et al. The novel C5aR antagonist DF3016A protects neurons against ischemic Neuroinflammatory injury. Neurotox Res. 2019;36(1):163–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-019-00026-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao H, Dairaghi DJ, Powers JP, Ertl LS, Baumgart T, Wang Y, et al. C5a receptor (CD88) blockade protects against MPO-ANCA GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(2):225–31. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013020143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Z, Yu W, Qiang Y, Xu L, Ma F, Ding P, et al. LukS-PV inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by Downregulating HDAC2 expression. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:547–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omto.2020.05.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen J, Sun ZH, Chen LY, Xu F, Zhao YP, Li GQ, et al. C5aR deficiency attenuates the breast cancer development via the p38/p21 axis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(14):14285–99. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zha H, Han X, Zhu Y, Yang F, Li Y, Li Q, et al. Blocking C5aR signaling promotes the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(10):e1349587. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1349587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Vadrevu SK, Chintala NK, Sharma SK, Sharma P, Cleveland C, Riediger L, et al. Complement c5a receptor facilitates cancer metastasis by altering T-cell responses in the metastatic niche. Cancer Res. 2014;74(13):3454–65. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Key Clinical Specialty for Laboratory Medicine Excellent Project (No. ZK201000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, P. R. China

    Ziran Wang

  2. Center of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

    Wenwei Yu

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

    Yawen Qiang

  4. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

    Fan Ma

  5. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China

    Pengsheng Ding

  6. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yiji Shan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China

    Yangyan Wang

Authors
  1. Ziran Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenwei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yawen Qiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pengsheng Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yangyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZRW conceived and designed the research. WZR, WWY and YWQ extracted data and conducted quality assessment. FM, PSD and ZRW analyzed the data. ZRW wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziran Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors declared no conflicts of interests in this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. PRISMA 2020 Checklist of this study.

Additional file 2: Table S2

. The clinical characteristics of the included studies. Fig. S1. Forest plot of studies evaluating the associations between the C5aR expression levels and clinicopathological features. Fig. S2. Sensitivity analysis of studies evaluating the associations between the C5aR expression levels and clinicopathological features. Fig. S3. Funnel plot for publication bias in this meta-analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Yu, W., Qiang, Y. et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of C5aR in human solid tumors: a Meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 21, 1136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08883-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08883-5

Keywords

  • C5aR
  • Cancer
  • Prognosis
  • Clinicopathology
  • Meta-analysis

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us