Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risks and cancer associations of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers: a 25-year retrospective study

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 1045 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The situation of patients developing multiple primary cancers is becoming more frequent and graver. This study investigated the risks of developing second primary cancers that are related to first primary cancers, and the interval times of synchronous and metachronous multiple primary cancers.

Patients and methods

Retrospective data were retrieved from 109,054 patients aged ≥18 who were diagnosed with a first solid cancer and registered at Siriraj Cancer Center between 1991 and 2015. A two-month period between first- and second- primary cancers was used to differentiate metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers. The combinations of subsequent cancers and relative risks (RRs) of having multiple primary cancers versus having single primary cancer for the top-ten first and second primary cancers were examined. The RR was adjusted for age of the first primary cancer. A survival analysis of the time to second-primary-cancer development was performed.

Results

Multiple primary cancers were found in 1785 (1.63%) patients. Most (70.87%) second primary cancers occurred after 2 months of first breast, skin, colorectal, lung, head and neck, liver, male genital cancer–prostate, thyroid, and female genital cancer–non-uterine cancers, resulting in those cancers being classified as metachronous multiple primary cancer. After adjustment for age at first diagnosis, head and neck cancers had the highest metachronous association with second esophageal cancers (RR, 25.06; 95% CI, 13.41–50.77). Prostate cancer and second colorectal cancer also demonstrated a high metachronous association (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.25–3.05). A strong synchronous association was found between uterine and ovarian cancers (RR, 27.77; 95% CI, 17.97–43.63). The median time from the first uterine cancer to second-cancer development was 55 days.

Conclusions

The top-ten most frequent multiple primary cancers were the following: breast; liver; head and neck; colorectal; male genital cancer–prostate; skin; female genital cancer–uterine; thyroid; lung; and female genital cancer–non-uterine. Second primary cancers showed specific associations that depended on the first primary cancer. Physicians should be cognizant of the most common combinations and the interval times of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers.

Peer Review reports

Background

The survival rate of cancer patients is improving globally. In addition to steady advances in diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities, early detection and proper management are contributing to the prolonging of the survival of cancer patients [1,2,3]. Patients with a history of cancer may develop several cancers in their lives [4]. When a patient is diagnosed with more than one cancer, multiple primary cancers may be reported. Recently, the prevalence of multiple primary cancers has risen [5,6,7]. A better understanding of the characteristics and risks of multiple primary cancers may be beneficial for cancer management.

The term “multiple primary cancers” refers to the synchronous or metachronous appearances of cancers in the same individual, but does not include instances of the metastasis of initial primary cancers [8]. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program recommended that second primary cancers that occurred within 2 months of the first primary tumor should be defined as synchronous multiple primary cancers [9, 10]. The presence of synchronous and metachronous malignant cancers is problematic if each of the cancers is active [8]. The challenge is to find an anticancer therapy that addresses the active malignancies in each patient but does not increase toxicity, create undesirable pharmacological interactions, nor have an adverse impact on the overall outcomes [8]. Therefore, the prediction and prevention of second cancer occurrences may help to improve the quality of life and prolong overall survival of cancer patients [11].

Retaining a cancer registry is one of the most effective approaches to studying cancer epidemiology and healthcare-management planning worldwide. Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, is the largest tertiary hospital in Thailand, provide 2 million of outpatient services each year. The Siriraj Cancer Center was established in 1945. The performance of its cancer registry is regularly audited and reported in accordance with specifications prescribed in the World Health Organization–International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition (ICD-O-3) [12]. The cancer registry houses accurate and essential hospital-based data of all patients who receive cancer treatment at Siriraj Hospital [13].

In addition to investigating the risks of solid multiple primary cancers in terms of the first and second primary cancers, we also aimed to estimate the time to the development of second cancers. We classified metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers using a cutoff of 2 months, in accordance with SEER criteria [9, 10]. Essentially, cancers occurring within 2 months of each other are deemed synchronous, whereas those developing later than 2 months are regarded as metachronous [9]. As the Universal Health Coverage system achieves in Thailand that more than 90% of the population can access healthcare systems [14], the survival of some cancer trends to increase [15]. Although, some site-specific cancer care survivorship guidelines were existed [16, 17], the development of appropriate surveillance strategies should be studied for improving the quality of life in Thai cancer population. The significance of this study lies in better understanding of types of secondary primary specific cancers and the durations until their occurrence. At a minimum, it should facilitate such knowledge that may assist with the development of appropriate long-term surveillance strategies.

Methods

Ethical approval and data set

Before commencement of the study, ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Siriraj Hospital (Si293/2018). Retrospective data were retrieved from the cancer registry of Siriraj Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University [18]. The methods were performed in accordance with all approved guidelines.

Patient cohort

Siriraj Cancer Registry was established in 1969 to track the prevalence of cancer at Siriraj Hospital. All patients diagnosed with new cancer or referred for first treatment were included in the registry. Validating data of staging, treatment and survival were periodically appended every 2–3 months. The endpoint of follow-up was death or loss of follow-up. However, a systematic and complete linkage of incidence cases against mortality data was not carried out for some patients. The initial cohort of 129,514 individuals included all new patients aged above 18 years who had been diagnosed with first primary cancers and registered with the Siriraj Cancer Center between 1991 and 2015.

The primary cancer site was defined as per the ICD-O-3 description [12], and it was categorized into 20 major types of solid cancer, based on topography codes. The types were breast, head and neck, liver, colorectal, lung, thyroid, ovarian, skin, bladder, stomach, brain and other nervous, esophageal, pancreatic, renal, bone and cartilage, heart and thymus, adrenocortical, female genital, male genital, and other cancers (sarcoma). Cancers of the female genital organ were classified as uterine and non-uterine, while cancers of the male genital organ were classified as prostate and non-prostate. Excluded were patients with 1842 malignant lymphomas; 11,780 cancer sites in the hematopoietic system, reticuloendothelial system, or lymph nodes; and 5061 unknown primary sites. 10 men with breast cancer were also not included. The resulting number of subjects in this study was 109,054.

The final study cohort included 2552 patients who had more than one topography code allowing for a minimum of 2 months after first cancer diagnosis to determine the presence of second primary cancer. The patients with less than 2 months of follow-up were excluded from the analysis. The individual data such as date of diagnosis, histology, treatment, laterality of paired organ, of each patient in final study cohort were verified and clarified by registry staffs of the hospital. The multiple primary cancers were handled and identified by registry staffs using SEER rules [9]. Excluded were patients with 767 metastasis and recurrence of cancers (Fig. 1). With the regular data validating every 2–3 months, the framework of the Siriraj Cancer Registry effectively identify the time to the development of the second primary cancers.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of Siriraj Cancer Registry and eligible study cohort. Siriraj Cancer Registry (black line), eligible study cohort (blue line)

Full size image

Definition of multiple primary tumors

This study utilized the definitions of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary tumors determined by the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute [9]. Under the SEER rules, the term “metachronous multiple primary tumors” refers to cases in which second primary tumors are diagnosed more than 2 months after the diagnosis of the related first primary tumors [9, 10]. By comparison, “synchronous multiple primary tumors” are defined as second primary tumors occurring within 2 months of the first primary tumors [9, 10]. SEER rules also take into account of the topography, date of diagnosis, histology, and laterality of paired organs per lifetime [9]. In brief, the duration between the first and second cancer diagnoses, and second primary tumors whose histopathologies match those of their related first tumors, are considered. In addition, every segment of the colon is regarded as a single primary site [9].

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed using R (version 3.6; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [19]. The differences in clinical characteristics between the group with single primary cancer vs the group with multiple primary cancers were tested with chi-squared test for sex and t-test for age. Similarly, the differences in sex and age between metachronous and synchronous tumors were tested using chi-squared test and t-test, respectively. A P value of < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. The relative risk (RR) for developing multiple primary cancers versus single primary cancer was estimated and adjusted for age of the first primary cancer using, quasi-poisson model via glm R package [19]. A survival analysis of the time to the development of the second primary cancers was performed using the “survminer” R package [20].

Results

The 25-year statistics of single and multiple primary cancers

We identified 109,054 patients who had been registered with a first solid cancer by the cancer registry of Siriraj Cancer Center over the 25-year period between 1991 and 2015. Of those cases, 1785 (1.63%) developed a second primary cancer (Table 1). Most cancer patients were female (57.3%). In addition, the patients with multiple primary cancers were significantly older than those with a single primary cancer (mean ages, 57.2 vs. 60.2 years; P <  0.001; RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [95% CI],1.01–1.02).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the analytical cohort. Clinical characteristics of patients with a single primary cancer and patients with multiple primary cancers
Full size table

The 25-year, the numbers of patients of single and multiple primary cancers at Siriraj Hospital are illustrated in Fig. 2A. Breast cancer was the most frequent form of single primary cancer (14.6%) and multiple primary cancer (23%). The top-ten multiple primary cancer types were the following: breast (23.0%); liver (14.8%); head and neck (12.2%); colorectal (11.4%); male genital cancer–prostate (5.5%); skin (5.3%); female genital cancer–uterine (5.2%); thyroid (3.1%); lung (2.8%); and female genital cancer–non-uterine (2.8%). Nearly all of those types were also found in the top-ten single primary cancers. Figure 2B and C present the distributions of the single and multiple primary cancers in 792 (44.4%) males and 993 (55.6%) females. The most common cancers were gender-specific.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The distribution of single primary cancer and multiple primary cancers. The distribution of single primary cancer and multiple primary cancers of 109,054 patients from 1991 to 2015 for all cases (A), males (B), and females (C). The green items represent the top-ten, first-diagnosed cancers of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers for all cases, males, and females

Full size image

The top-ten, first-diagnosed cancers of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers

Of the 1785 patients with multiple primary cancers, there were 1265 (70.87%) cases of metachronous multiple primary cancers and 520 (29.13%) cases of synchronous multiple primary cancers (Fig. 2A). Most of the multiple primary cancer patients were female (55.6%), and there were statistical differences in the distributions of the metachronous and synchronous cancers of each gender group (P <  0.001). The mean age at diagnosis of the first metachronous and synchronous cancers was 60 years (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of multiple primary cancers patients. Clinical characteristics of patients with metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers
Full size table

Figure 3A, B, and C illustrate the distribution of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers in all cases, males, and females, respectively. Most of the multiple primary cancers were metachronous multiple primary cancers (70.87%). We found that the survivors from breast cancer had the highest risk of developing metachronous (18.3%) and synchronous (34.6%) multiple primary cancers. The top-ten metachronous multiple primary cancer types were the following: liver (19.9%); breast (18.3%); head and neck (11.8%); colorectal (9.8%); male genital cancer–prostate (6.9%); skin (4.7%); thyroid (4.0%); female genital cancer–uterine (3.5%); lung (3.2%); and female genital cancer–non-uterine (3.2%). Female genital cancer–uterine had a higher incidence of synchronous (9.4%) than metachronous (3.5%) multiple primary cancers. It was also noted that most of the second primary cancers occurred more than 2 months after the first primary cancers had been diagnosed; the exception was female genital cancer–uterine, which tended to occur within 2 months.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The distribution of the first-diagnosed cancers of multiple primary cancers. The distribution of the first-diagnosed cancers of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers for all cases (A), males (B), and females (C). The green items represent the top-ten, first-diagnosed cancers of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers for all cases, males, and females

Full size image

Times to second cancers

Based on the results of the survival analysis, the median times to the development of the second cancers of the top-ten multiple primary cancers are illustrated in Fig. 4. The median times differed among the cancer types. The shortest duration (55 days) was between the diagnosis of first female genital cancer–uterine and the detection of a subsequent cancer. Next were the median times following breast, skin, and colorectal cancer diagnoses (each within 1 year). Second cancers developed within 2 years for first lung cancers and for head and neck cancers. Longer medians (more than 2 years) were revealed for the development of second cancers following diagnoses of liver, male genital cancer–prostate, thyroid, and female genital cancer–non-uterine.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Time to develop multiple primary cancers. The median times to the development of multiple primary cancers, stratified by the first cancer that had developed in patients

Full size image

The combinations of first primary cancers and metachronous and synchronous second primary cancers

From the 10 first multiple primary cancers of all cases, we predicted the RRs adjusted for age between the first and second primary cancers. We also identified the combinations of first primary cancers and metachronous and synchronous second primary cancers (Fig. 5). The combination of first breast cancer and second breast cancer was statistically significant, compared with the combination of first breast cancer and other cancer types (RR, 14.17; 95% CI, 11.12–18.27; P < 0.0001). Additionally, female patients with breast cancer had an elevated risk of occurrence of second female genital cancer–uterine (RR, 4.30; 95% CI, 2.39–7.87; P < 0.0001), which mostly occurred after 2 months. We observed that head and neck cancers had a strong association with second esophageal cancer (RR, 25.06; 95% CI, 13.41–50.77; P < 0.0001), second head and neck cancer (RR, 10.41; 95% CI, 7.61–14.31; P < 0.0001), and second lung cancer (RR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.58–3.58; P < 0.0001). Moreover, we found that male patients with first prostate cancer had an elevated risk of second bladder cancer (RR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.56–6.28; P < 0.0001) and second colorectal cancer (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.25–3.05; P < 0.01), both of which mostly developed after more than 2 months.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The risk of top-ten combination cancers. The combination cases of the top-ten first primary cancers and subsequent second primary cancers for metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers (*, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; RR, relative risk of having multiple primary cancer versus having single primary cancer, adjusted for age at first primary cancer)

Full size image

Discussion

The increase in the number of multiple primary cancers is challenging worldwide. Understanding the characteristic of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers may facilitate the development of better management plans for patients. We found that the 10 most common multiple primary cancers were the following types: breast, liver, head and neck, colorectal, male genital cancer–prostate, skin, female genital cancer–uterine, thyroid, lung, and female genital cancer–non-uterine. Those cancers also had a high cumulative incidence at Siriraj Hospital from 1991 to 2015. This finding is consistent with the common cancer types in Thailand and the United States [21, 22]. The survivors from these cancers may face a second primary cancer in their lifetime. Moreover, our results suggested that most of the patients with multiple primary cancers were older at diagnosis of their first cancer than were those diagnosed with a single primary cancer. This may reflect the poor prognosis for young adults with cancers, such as breast cancer [23] and colorectal cancer [24]. Breast cancers in young adults have a higher incidence of the more aggressive triple-negative form and are less hormone-sensitive than those in older adults [25]. As to colorectal cancers, they have a more mucinous histology and greater frequency of signet ring cells in young adults than in older adults, resulting in a markedly poor prognosis [26].

Among the patients with multiple primary cancers, there was a higher incidence of second cancers in females than males, which differs from the reported pattern of development of second cancers in the United States [11]. In the current study, we defined multiple primary cancers according to the SEER rules. The SEER Program considers topography, date of diagnosis, histology, and laterality of paired organs per lifetime [9]. Under the SEER rules, second primary breast cancers whose histopathologies match those of the related first breast cancers, and the duration to cancer diagnosis, are considered [9]. Moreover, each segment of the colon is regarded as a single primary cancer [9]. However, these rules differ from those used for multiple primary cancers by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the International Association of Cancer Registries (IACR) [27, 28]. The IARC/IACR does not define multiple primary cancers depending on time; instead, only one tumor (depending on the histological group) per organ or pair of organs per person per lifetime is reported [27, 28]. Furthermore, the significantly high levels of breast cancer in all regions of Thailand [21] may have increased the number of multiple primary cancers that the present study found among females.

Breast cancer, the most frequently found multiple primary cancer, was commonly associated with second breast cancer and second female genital cancer–uterine. This is consistent with reports from the United States [29, 30]. The common combination of first breast cancer and second breast cancer may be explained by the increased expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in patients with first primary breast cancers, thereby triggering the development of multiple primary cancers [31]. Similarly, the combination of first thyroid cancer and second thyroid cancer may be triggered by the increased levels of thyroid globulin and thyroid peroxidase in patients [31].

The metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers were differentiated by using the cutoff period of 2 months. We observed that most of the multiple primary cancers were metachronous. Only female genital cancer–uterine was assessed as having more synchronous than metachronous multiple primary cancers. Our results suggest that patients with uterine cancer should be monitored for the development of a second ovarian cancer within 2 months (median period, 55 days). The uterine and ovarian cancer association may be explained by either a mutation or an overexpression of BRCA1/BRCA2, and by MMR genes [32]. Patients with uterine cancer who have those genes should be immediately investigated for the presence of second primary tumors.

Head and neck cancers were among the ten most common multiple primary cancers. The combination of head and neck cancer was distributed among several cancer types within 2 years (namely, esophageal, head and neck, and lung), with high RRs after adjustment for age at first primary cancer. The development of the second primary head and neck cancers may result from radiation treatment [33].

Secondary colorectal cancer was found to be strongly associated with first male genital cancer–prostate and first colorectal cancer. Our results suggested that survivors of colorectal cancer should be monitored to detect second cancer development within 1 year. In contrast, patients with prostate cancer may develop a second cancer after longer than 2 years. The multiple primary tumors found in colorectal cancer may be associated with hereditary colorectal cancer and could be explained by genetic profiling. The occurrence of first colorectal cancer followed by second colorectal cancer have been commonly identified with BRCA1/BRCA2, and MMR genes [32]. The combination of prostate cancer and colon cancer share both genetic risk factors such as the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation [34] and dietary ones [35].

An improvement of diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities, early detection and proper management helps to prolong the survival of cancer patients [1,2,3]. Several site-specific cancer care survivorship guidelines were existed [16, 17]. Although those guidelines may be appropriate for survivors of some cancers, this current finding may incorporate with them to help estimate risk of a subsequent cancer. Our study suggested that multiple primary cancers may occur months or year after first cancers were diagnosed. Patients with first cancer diagnosis and survivors of some cancers may be screened for genetic risk factors such as MMR and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations [32, 34]. For example, patients with uterine cancer with those gene mutations should be immediately investigated for the presence of second primary tumors. Survivors with breast and colorectal cancer with genetic factors are advised to annual follow-up as guideline [17, 36], and our results suggest these patients should be followed within 1 year after first cancer diagnosis. During the follow-up, attention should be paid on the second primary cancers that showed specific association, and depended on the first primary cancer such as first breast and second breast cancer, first prostate and second bladder cancer, and first prostate and second colorectal cancer.

Limitations

Although our study was based on data from population-based registry of Siriraj Hospital, the largest tertiary hospital in Thailand, the registry of one hospital is the limitation. As Thai government provides the majority healthcare through countrywide public hospitals including Siriraj Hospital, our study cases are mostly low- and middle-income patients as general population in public hospitals. However, Siriraj Hospital is one of the best-known medical school and the largest referral center of various complex diseases, patients from all regions of the country have access to the hospital. Therefore, the majority of cancer patients in this study may be more complexity of the disease than in general patient population.

Currently, mainly two definitions of multiple primary cancers are used, SEER [9] and IARC/IACR/ and European Network of Cancer Registries, ENCR [27]. For this study, we applied SEER rules in the definition of multiple primary cancers, would make it difficult to compare with IARC/IACR/ENCR. IARC/IACR/ENCR rules are less complex than the other leading to facilitate international comparison [37]. SEER rules may over count multiple primary cancers in the same anatomic site [37]. Whereas in separate organ systems, both rules present the similar count of multiple primary cancers [37]. This study lacked sensitivity analyses of both definition rules. However, a comparison of both definition rules was studied [37], and a combination of them was also reported [38].

This study adjusted for age, therefore improved aging itself does not increase risk estimates. The behavior such as smoking status [39] and sun protection [40] that are likely related to the development of the first and second primary cancers cannot be measured in this study. Patient demographics such as marital status, income, tumor grade and tumor stage were excluded in our analysis; however, another study found those confounding factors strongly associated with risks of a subsequent cancer [11]. The treatment types seem to influence the higher risk of the second primary head and neck cancers [33]. We were unable to collect information either family history of cancer or genetic risk factors that may identify high risk individuals.

Despite the competitive risk of survival between single and multiple primary cancers was not performed to analyze in this study. Another research found that patients with multiple primary cancer had longer survival than those with single primary cancer [41]; however, some cancer types such as multiple lung cancers indicated a poorer prognosis than single primary cancer [42].

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study revealed evidence of a strong association between the co-occurrence of specific cancers in terms of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers. Our results suggested that second primary cancers have a specific dependency on first primary cancers. Additionally, our results indicated that the risk of developing second cancers is probably time-dependent. Further studies on the genetic profiles of the associated primary cancers may expand our understanding of multiple primary cancers and thereby enhance cancer management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ward ZJ, Grover S, Scott AM, Woo S, Salama DH, Jones EC, et.al. The role and contribution of treatment and imaging modalities in global cervical cancer management: survival estimates from a simulation-based analysis. Lancet oncol 2020;21(8):1077–1088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30317-X.

  2. Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, et.al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med 2020;383:640–649, 7, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1916623.

  3. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(2):89–103. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.81072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LA, Scoppa S, Feuer EJ. Multiple cancer prevalence: a growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16(3):566–71. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabuchi T, Ito Y, Ioka A, Miyashiro I, Tsukuma H. Incidence of metachronous second primary cancers in Osaka, Japan: update of analyses using population-based cancer registry data. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(6):1111–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02254.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Utada M, Ohno Y, Hori M, Soda M. Incidence of multiple primary cancers and interval between first and second primary cancers. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(7):890–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Feller A, Matthes KL, Bordoni A, Bouchardy C, Bulliard JL, Herrmann C, et al. The relative risk of second primary cancers in Switzerland: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6452-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, Heinimann K, Frick H, Herrmann C, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open. 2017;2(2):e000172. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson CH, Peace S, Adamo P, Fritz A, Percy-Laurry A, Edwards BK. The 2007 multiple primary and histology coding rules. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Bethesda, MD, 2007.

  10. Xiong J, Su Y, Bing Z, Zhao B. Survival between synchronous and non-synchronous multiple primary cutaneous melanomas-a SEER database analysis. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8316. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8316.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Donin N, Filson C, Drakaki A, Tan HJ, Castillo A, Kwan L, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies among cancer survivors in the United States, 1992 through 2008. Cancer. 2016;122(19):3075–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ratanawichitrasin A, Ratanawichitrasin S. Siriraj Cancer registry since 1969: history and current situations. Siriraj Med J. 2020;63(6):205–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tangcharoensathien V, Patcharanarumol W, Panichkriangkrai W. Health system review: achievements and challenges. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization c/o Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kittrongsiri K, Wanitsuwan W, Prechawittayakul P, Sangroongruangsri S, Cairns J, Chaikledkaew U. Survival analysis of colorectal cancer patients in a Thai hospital-based cancer registry. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;14(4):291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2020.1740087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skolarus TA, Wolf AM, Erb NL, Brooks DD, Rivers BM, Underwood W, et al. American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J for Clin. 2014;64(4):225–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Shami K, Oeffinger KC, Erb NL, Willis A, Bretsch JK, Pratt-Chapman ML, et al. American Cancer Society colorectal cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(6):428–55. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Siriraj Cancer Registry. Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital: Siriraj Cancer Center. Retrieved July 9, 2021, from URL: https://www.si.mahidol.ac.th/th/department/cancer/registry.php.

  19. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing; 2019. URL: https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kassambara A, Kosinski M and Biecek P. (2019). Survminer: drawing survival curves using 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survmine.

  21. Virani S, Bilheem S, Chansaard W, Chitapanarux I, Daoprasert K, Khuanchana S, et al. National and subnational population-based incidence of Cancer in Thailand: assessing cancers with the highest burdens. Cancers (Basel). 2017;9(8):108. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brandt J, Garne JP, Tengrup I, Manjer J. Age at diagnosis in relation to survival following breast cancer: a cohort study. World J Surg Onc. 2015;13(33):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-014-0429-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shida D, Ahiko Y, Tanabe T, Yoshida T, Tsukamoto S, Ochiai H, et al. Shorter survival in adolescent and young adult patients, compared to adult patients, with stage IV colorectal cancer in Japan. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(334):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4241-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tzikas AK, Nemes S, Linderholm BK. A comparison between young and old patients with triple-negative breast cancer: biology, survival and metastatic patterns. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182(3):643–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05727-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chou CL, Tseng CJ, Shiue YL. The impact of young age on the prognosis for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47(11):1010–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyx110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. IARC/ENCR/IACR Working Group. International rules for multiple primary cancers. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2005;6:104–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. International Agency for Research on Cancer. International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers (ICD-O Third Edition). Internal Report No. 2004/02. Lyon; 2004, IARC.

  29. Curtis RE, Ron E, Hankey BF, Hoover RN. New malignancies following breast cancer. In: Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, LAG R, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, et al., editors. New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. p. 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mellemkjaer L, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Pukkala E, Weiderpass E, Bray F, et al. Risk of primary non-breast cancer after female breast cancer by age at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(8):1784–92. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Wu Y, Liu F, Fu L, Tong Z. Characteristics and survival of patients with metachronous or synchronous double primary malignancies: breast and thyroid cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(32):52450–9. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan GHJ, Ong PY, Low JJH, Kong HL, Ow SGW, Tan DSP, et al. Clinical genetic testing outcome with multi-gene panel in Asian patients with multiple primary cancers. Oncotarget. 2018;9(55):30649–60. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamoto E, Shibuya H, Yoshimura R, Miura M. Site specific dependency of second primary cancer in early stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94(7):2007–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, Saunders E, Leongamornlert D, Tymrakiewicz M, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1748–57. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer.

  36. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast Cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):43–73. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weir HK, Johnson CJ, Ward KC, Coleman MP. The effect of multiple primary rules on cancer incidence rates and trends. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(3):377–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0714-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Coyte A, Morrison DS, McLoone P. Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Romaszko-Wojtowicz A, Buciński A, Doboszyńska A. Impact of smoking on multiple primary cancers survival: a retrospective analysis. Clin Exp Med. 2018;18(3):391–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-018-0498-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kricker A, Armstrong BK, Goumas C, Litchfield M, Begg CB, Hummer AJ, et al. Ambient UV, personal sun exposure and risk of multiple primary melanomas. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18(3):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0091-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Amer MH. Multiple neoplasms, single primaries, and patient survival. Cancer Manag Res. 2014;5(6):119–34. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S57378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu B, Cui Y, Tian J, Song X, Hu P, Wei S. Effect of second primary cancer on the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(2):573–82. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.11.96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supatee Karakate retrieved the cancer data from the Siriraj Cancer Registry.

Aem-on Rattanakumnerd, Kanokporn Thamapala, Tippawan Gerdsuriwong, Onchira Acharayothin and Nongnard Thamnongdee clarified the cancer data obtained from the Siriraj Cancer Registry Database.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Siriraj Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

    Pariyada Tanjak, Panudeth Juengwiwattanakitti, Benjarat Thiengtrong, Cholticha Songjang & Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul

  2. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Pariyada Tanjak, Panudeth Juengwiwattanakitti, Benjarat Thiengtrong & Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul

  3. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Bhoom Suktitipat

  4. Siriraj Center of Excellent for Research in Bioinformatics and Clinical Data Management, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Bhoom Suktitipat

  5. Integrative Computational Bioscience Center, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

    Bhoom Suktitipat

  6. Siriraj Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Nutchavadee Vorasan

  7. Department of Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Suwanit Therasakvichya

  8. Department of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Somsri Laiteerapong

Authors
  1. Pariyada Tanjak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhoom Suktitipat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nutchavadee Vorasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Panudeth Juengwiwattanakitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjarat Thiengtrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cholticha Songjang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suwanit Therasakvichya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Somsri Laiteerapong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul (vitoon.chi@mahidol.ac.th): investigation, conceptualization, validation, writing of original draft, manuscript review and editing, visualization, and supervision. Pariyada Tanjak (pariyada.tan@mahidol.edu): investigation, conceptualization, validation, formal analysis, writing of original draft, manuscript review and editing, and visualization. Bhoom Suktitipat (bhoom.suk@mahidol.edu): validation, formal analysis, formal statistical analysis, and manuscript review and editing. Nutchavadee Vorasan (nutchavadee.vor@mahidol.edu): formal statistical analysis. Panudeth Juengwiwattanakitti (panudeth.j@gmail.com) and Benjarat Thiengtrong (benjarat.thi@mahidol.ac.th): formal analysis and data clarification. Cholticha Songjang (cholticha.son@mahidol.ac.th): data clarification. Suwanit Therasakvichya (suwanit.the@mahidol.ac.th): investigation, conceptualization, and manuscript review and revision. Somsri Laiteerapong (somsri.rat@mahidol.ac.th): investigation, methodology, data clarification, and manuscript review and revision. Pariyada Tanjak and Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul take ultimate responsibility for the integrity of the contents contained herein. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before its commencement, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Siriraj Hospital, Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB), Certificate of Approval Number: Si293/2018. The need for consent for participation is deemed unnecessary according to the retrospective nature without identifiable patient information. The requirement for informed consent was waived. Waivers of consent are primarily requested for this research involving the second analysis of existing data. Owing to this research met the requirements of informed consent waiver including: the research involved no more than minimal risk to the patients; the waiver did not adversely affect the right and welfare of the patients; the research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver; and whenever appropriate the patients was provided with additional pertinent information after participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. Consent was waived by Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB) for this retrospective study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanjak, P., Suktitipat, B., Vorasan, N. et al. Risks and cancer associations of metachronous and synchronous multiple primary cancers: a 25-year retrospective study. BMC Cancer 21, 1045 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08766-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08766-9

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us