Skip to main content

An in-silico study examining the induction of apoptosis by Cryptotanshinone in metastatic melanoma cell lines



Metastatic melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer that evades various anti-cancer treatments including surgery, radio-,immuno- and chemo-therapy. TRAIL-induced apoptosis is a desirable method to treat melanoma since, unlike other treatments, it does not harm non-cancerous cells. The pro-inflammatory response to melanoma by nF κB and STAT3 pathways makes the cancer cells resist TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We show that due to to its dual action on DR5, a death receptor for TRAIL and on STAT3, Cryptotanshinone can be used to increase sensitivity to TRAIL.


The development of chemoresistance and invasive properties in melanoma cells involves several biological pathways. The key components of these pathways are represented as a Boolean network with multiple inputs and multiple outputs.


The possible mutations in genes that can lead to cancer are captured by faults in the combinatorial circuit and the model is used to theoretically predict the effectiveness of Cryptotanshinone for inducing apoptosis in melanoma cell lines. This prediction is experimentally validated by showing that Cryptotanshinone can cause enhanced cell death in A375 melanoma cells.


The results presented in this paper facilitate a better understanding of melanoma drug resistance. Furthermore, this framework can be used to detect additional drug intervention points in the pathway that could amplify the action of Cryptotanshinone.

Peer Review reports


Melanoma is one of the most prevalent and aggressive forms of skin cancer. Normal melanocytes are the light receptors in the skin and are equipped to protect and repair the body from damage caused by radiation. The chemoresistance of melanoma cell lines has been attributed to their inherent capability to survive. In melanoma cells in particular, and cancer cells in general, this survival mechanism is hijacked by the mutated genes and exploited to counter medical treatment [1].

The human body reacts to threats by relying on its immune system and by appropriate functioning of the cellular signaling pathways. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is implicated in immunosurveillance, which is the ability of the immune system to recognize pathogens and activate the mechanisms to neutralize their effect [2]. TRAIL resistance is observed in melanoma cell lines; it is associated with the mutations in cell survival pathways [3, 4].

Abnormalities in cell cycle control are a characteristic of cancer, and this is accompanied by uncontrolled growth [5]. Drugs used to treat melanoma try to restore the normal cell cycle function through action on the cell survival pathways. Metastatic melanoma cells are known to develop resistance to most of the commonly used drugs and therapy [1]. Chemoresistance is linked with TRAIL resistance in melanoma [4]. Treatment strategies that involve sensitization of the melanoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis have shown promise [6]. Cryptotanshinone is one of the drugs that has been shown to restore TRAIL sensitivity [7].

This paper will model the development of drug resistance in metastatic melanoma cells, using a Boolean network to explain the induction of apoptosis by Cryptotanshinone. The paper is organized as follows. The first section describes the functions of the various pathways in cancer and how they contribute to drug resistance. The following section describes the Boolean formalization of these pathways. Finally, the theoretical results are presented, followed by the experimental validation in the last section. For clarity of presentation, the color schemes shown in Figs. 1 and 2 will be used while schematically modeling signaling pathways and the interactions between genes. Extensive use of these schemes can be seen in Figs. 3 through 8 to follow.

Fig. 1

Color coding for gene interactions in Figs. 3 through 8

Fig. 2

Legend for use in Figs. 3 through 8

Fig. 3

Extrinsic Apoptosis and the nF κB pathways

Biological pathways in melanoma

The various gene interactions in melanoma can be represented by biological pathways, which are all well documented [810]. Some of the interconnections derived during modelling these pathways are based on the interpretation of different research papers [3, 1122] by the authors of the present paper. We consider only a subset of all possible interconnections and signaling pathways in the cell, since the cancer of interest to us here is melanoma.

TRAIL resistance is attributed to the activation of the nF κB pathway and the cell survival pathways. Pro-inflammatory response of nF κB leads to the overexpression of cFLIP (Cellular FLICE (FADD-like IL-1 β-converting enzyme)-inhibitory protein) that interferes with the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), an important step in the extrinsic apoptosis governed by TRAIL [3, 23]. This is clearly shown in Fig. 3.

Another possible reason for the development of TRAIL resistance is due to the lower expression of death receptors - death receptor 4 (DR4) and 5 (DR5) [4]. TRAIL receptors are abundantly expressed in the early stages of melanoma, however as the immune system fails to combat cancer growth, the TRAIL-induced apoptosis is affected.

The cell survival pathways mTOR/PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK have been implicated as contributors to TRAIL resistance [4, 24]. These two anti-apoptotic pathways govern melanocytes; control their cell cycle, promote proliferation, growth and survival [14]. They may be involved in melanomagenesis, particularly N-Ras, B-Raf and PTEN loss are some of the commonly occurring mutations of Ras, Raf and PTEN respectively [810]. These pathway mutations can attenuate the cytotoxicity of several drugs [24].

Figure 4 shows the crosstalk between the two cell survival pathways and how they mutually control the p53 pathway. The tumor suppressor gene p53 is also considered to be an oncogene. Referred to as the master guardian gene, p53 responds rapidly to DNA damage [25]. Figure 5 shows how the cell cycle arrest can occur if DNA damage is detected and can lead to the activation of the tumor suppressor action of p53 [26]. Once activated, p53 serves as a brake on cell proliferation as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

JNK, p53, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK pathways

Fig. 5

DNA damage pathway

There are other pathways which are involved in TRAIL resistance indirectly, such as the pathway governing the unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR is triggered by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress as depicted in Fig. 6. In melanoma, UPR may aid metastasis via the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)[27]. UPR could be linked to chemoresistance and TRAIL resistance, as it activates the pro-inflammatory response. JNK is also activated in response to ER stress, it inhibits IL8 signaling and increases TRAIL-induced apoptosis [28]. JNK is also involved in the upregulation of CHOP and Bak/Bax, both of which are pro-apoptotic factors [29]. These relationships involving JNK are captured in the pathway diagram in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the JNK pathway

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a part in decreasing TRAIL cytotoxicity in metastatic melanoma cells. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) is a transcriptional target of both nF κB and STAT3, and is a regulator of inflammatory response. Inhibition of STAT3 causes a decrease in protein expression of COX2 [30]. STAT3 is also activated upon incidence of ER stress by PERK [31]. The increase of metastatic activity by UPR is partly due to the action of STAT3 [31]. Additionally, STAT3 upregulates Mcl1, an anti-apoptotic factor, thus contributing to cell survival [17].

The role of STAT3 in cancer cells is extensive as is evident from the pathway diagram in Fig. 7. STAT3 is activated in the skin to achieve migration of keratinocytes, that produce proinflammatory mediators and initiate immune response [32]. It regulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mitochondria. ROS levels influence mitochondrial membrane potential and are important driving factors in mitochondrial apoptosis and are shown to have an effect on TRAIL sensitivity [3335]. Given its influence on the various pathways involved in developing TRAIL resistance, STAT3 is a good candidate to induce TRAIL sensitivity [36, 37].

Fig. 7

STAT3 pathway

There are several existing drugs that act at different points in the MAPK/ERK and mTOR/PI3K/Akt pathways as is shown in Fig. 4; however none of them have been proven significantly effective against melanoma [1]. A possible mechanism for drug resistance is the failure to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Typically, most cancer cells deactivate the pathways to apoptosis and simultaneously heighten the activities of the cell proliferation and growth pathways [5]. The balance of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic factors determines the fate of the cell [12, 13]. These factors are regulated by genes in different signaling pathways as can be seen in Table 1. The mitochondrial pathway which governs cellular respiration and apoptosis in many cells is shown in Fig. 8. The matrix membrane permeability depends on the ratio of the pro-apoptotic to the anti-apoptotic factors and is controlled by the matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) [13]. It is noteworthy that in both normal and cancer cells, the expression of pro-apoptotic factors can be detected [3]. This indicates that the upstream defects in cancer most likely inhibit apoptosis by an increase in the activity of anti-apoptotic genes. This fact is useful when trying to understand drug resistance.

Table 1 Mitochondrial apoptosis factors
Fig. 8

Mitochondrial Apoptosis Pathway

Cryptotanshinone as an effective drug

Cryptotanshinone (CT) is one of the bio-active compounds of the plant Salvia miltiorrhiza (danshen), the root extract of which has been used widely in traditional Chinese herbal treatment for various diseases. There are many studies discussing the effects of CT on cancer [3840], and on melanoma [7, 18, 30, 41]. Cryptotanshinone has been shown to kill tumor-initiating cells (cancer stem cells) by targeting stemness genes [40], cause cell cycle G0/G1 and G2/M phase arrest, counter metastasis and invasion of cancer cells [18], and activate the mitochondrial [41] as well as the extrinsic apoptotic pathways [7, 30]. Its protein structure and molecular targets have been studied in efforts to make it an effective drug for cardiovascular disease [38], and even for cancer [42].

CT can restore TRAIL sensitivity and induce apoptosis in A375 melanoma cells, by increasing DR5 expression via the induction of CHOP (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-homologous protein) [7]. In addition, STAT3 plays a key role in and is upstream of many of the functions that CT affects and is a known target of CT in other cancers [43, 44].


We model the biological signaling pathways that we have discussed in the “Background” section as a Boolean network. Each gene is a node and its direct interaction with another gene is represented as an edge. Gene expression is binarily quantized: a gene, if expressed is considered to be ON (State 1) and if not expressed, is considered to be OFF (State 0). If two or more genes interact to activate or inhibit a third gene, such relationships are modelled with the use of logic gates. The genetic regulatory network can then be thought of as a multi-input multi-output (MIMO) digital logic circuit.

A cancerous cell will not have the same input-output mapping as a normal one. This is due to the abnormalities that occur in the biological pathways of cancer cells. Malfunctioning genes lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation, increased inflammation and failure of the apoptotic pathways. These irregularities of tumor cells can be thought of as faults in the Boolean network, particularly stuck-at faults. A stuck-at fault occurs when a node in the network is permanently set to a fixed value of either zero (stuck-at-0 fault) or one (stuck-at-1 fault) [5]. This implies that the circuit will not change as expected when subjected to a certain set of inputs. The output vector of a faulty network then will be independent of the other signal values in the regulatory circuit. An over-expressed gene can be denoted as a stuck-at-1 fault. This notion is common in cancer where oncogenes tend to display similar faulty behaviour, irrespective of what input they receive and evade any corrective action from upstream. The effect of such a fault can be corrected by using a drug as shown in Fig. 9. On the other hand, a stuck-at-0 fault can result when a gene becomes permanently inactive, independent of the activity status of its upstream regulators. For example, a mutated p53 gene in a cancer cell will remain inactive despite being phosphorylated as a result of cellular DNA damage. This situation, common to several cancers, is one where a drug can correct a stuck-at-0 fault as shown in Fig. 10. The static Boolean network considered here is used to represent a trail resistant network and also includes information about how drug intervention could allow us to sensitize the melanoma cell lines to TRAIL. We focus on the TRAIL apoptotic pathway and on the effect the genes in the other pathways have on extrinsic cell death. The other inputs are DNA damage, ER stress and the growth factors that activate the pathways involved in melanoma. The outputs are all apoptotic factors, both pro- and anti- apoptotic, the ratio of which will decide whether the cell undergoes death. The input and output vectors are given by Eqs. 1 and 2 below:

$$ {\begin{aligned} \text{Input}=\ & [\!\text{ER Stress, TNF }\alpha, \text{TRAIL, PTP, IL6,}\\ &\text{DNA Damage, IGF, EGF}] \end{aligned}} $$
Fig. 9

Boolean representation of the drug action countering a stuck-at-one fault

Fig. 10

Boolean representation of the drug action countering a stuck-at-zero fault

$$ {\begin{aligned} \text{Output} =\ & [\text{Casp8, Bid, Bad, Bim, Bak/Bax, Casp12,}\\ &\text{Bcl-XL, Bcl2, XIAP, Mcl1}] \end{aligned}} $$

For A375 melanoma cells, we consider 6 possible faults in our model. These correspond to the common mutations in the involved pathways and especially those that have been shown to cause TRAIL resistance [24]. All possible combinations of the faults have been simulated, that is 64 different configurations of the fault vector are considered. It is important to note that each component of the fault vector is either zero or one based on whether a particular fault is present or not. A one in the fault vector can denote a stuck-at-one fault or a stuck-at-zero fault, whichever is consequential for that particular gene. For instance, if the fault vector is [1 0 0 0 0 0], this implies that the Ras gene is faulty. Since it is a stuck-at-one type of fault, it means that Ras is being constitutively expressed. On the other hand, presence of a stuck-at-zero fault represents the downregulation of the gene. For instance, when the fault vector equals [0 0 1 0 0 0], it means that PTEN is faulty and its suppressing action has failed. The fault vector components are given by Eq. 3 and the types of faults are as listed in Table 2.

$$ \text{Fault} =\ [\!\text{Ras, Raf, PTEN, p53, STAT3, DR5}] $$
Table 2 Faults

The activity points of the different drugs on the pathways have already been shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The components of the drug vector are displayed in Eq. 4.

$$ {\begin{aligned} \text{Drugs} =\ & [\!\text{CT, LY294002, Temsirolimus, UO126,} \\ &\text{Lapatinib, SH5-07, AG1024}] \end{aligned}} $$

Each component of the drug vector corresponds to whether or not that drug is applied, so a zero in the ith column indicates that the ith drug is not applied and vice versa. Since a major goal of this paper is to evaluate the action of Cyrptotanshinone, either by itself, or for enhancing the activity of other drug combinations, the combination of drugs considered here is limited to Cryptotanshinone alone and Cryptotanshinone in combination with the other drugs. Since there are six other drugs in the vector, a total of 26 drug combinations were tested. For instance, the drug vector [1 0 0 0 0 0 0] indicates that only Cryptotanshinone is applied.

For clarity of exposition, the entire Boolean network will be split up into three different components. Each component will follow the colour scheme shown in Fig. 11 and the interconnections between the three component networks will be indicated by the gray blocks. The three components are shown in Figs. 12, 13 and 14. Figure 12 shows the relationship between the DNA damage input and how the apoptotic factors are affected upon the incidence of DNA damage, and this figure also helps in closely studying the effect of a p53 fault. Similarly, Figs. 13 and 14 represent the gene interactions in the major pathways involved in melanoma. An additional Simulink file shows the entire Boolean network as a whole [see Additional file 1].

Fig. 11

Legend showing the color coding scheme used in Figs. 12, 13 and 14

Fig. 12

Boolean network for the DNA Damage pathway

Fig. 13

Boolean network for the TRAIL, ER Stress and STAT3 pathway

Fig. 14

Boolean network for the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK pathway

Results and discussion

We ran several rounds of simulations to test how Cryptotanshinone acts in combinations with the other drugs. To check the effectiveness of CT in increasing TRAIL cytotoxicity, we monitor its influence on the apoptosis induced. In this section, we are testing a TRAIL resistant static Boolean network. Here, it should be pointed out that a network can display trail resistance even in the absence of TRAIL, the resistance in that case having been residually left over from an earlier TRAIL induction event. The metric used to calculate the degree of apoptosis is:

$$\text{Apoptosis Ratio} = \frac{\sum \text{Pro-Apoptotic factors}}{\sum \text{Anti-Apoptotic factors}} $$

The apoptosis ratio is a measure of the relative change in apoptosis upon a change in conditions. The apoptosis ratio will change depending on different factors such as the values of the inputs, the presence of certain faults or the application of a drug. Changing the input combination to the Boolean network will change the value of the apoptosis ratio. Figure 15 presents three different states of the Boolean network, when the input vectors are:

  1. 1

    ‘0000000’ : ‘No Input’ which means that no growth factors, cytokines or stress signals are present and the STAT3 suppressor PTP is OFF.

    Fig. 15

    Apoptosis ratios for different inputs

  2. 2

    ‘0010000’ : ‘TRAIL-induced apoptosis’ which means that the TRAIL apoptotic pathway is active.

  3. 3

    ‘1000000’ : ‘ER Stress induced Apoptosis’ which considers ER Stress as the only active input.

Each color in the figure represents a different fault and drug combination. Blue stands for the situation where there is no fault and no drug; orange means that the DR5 and STAT3 faults are present; yellow shows the apoptosis induced by SH5-07 in the presence of these faults; and violet shows the apoptosis induced by CT in the presence of the two faults.

From Fig. 15, we can see that the apoptosis ratio is 1.67 when there is ‘No Input’ and ‘No Fault’. Moreover, we observe that CT is inducing apoptosis even in the absence of TRAIL or other apoptosis-inducing factors. This means that CT must be down-regulating the anti-apoptotic factors through its action on STAT3, thus leading to a relatively greater value of the apoptosis ratio.

A similar situation can be seen for the ‘ER Stress induced apoptosis’ case, where the apoptosis value increases upon application of CT. However, only its effect on STAT3 is not enough to explain the increased TRAIL sensitivity. This is clear by looking at the action of the other STAT3 inhibitor SH5-07, which is unsuccessful in inducing further apoptosis in the presence of the faults. Here, it is evident that the upregulation of DR5 by CT plays a role in increasing the apoptosis ratio.

Looking at the ‘TRAIL-induced apoptosis’ condition in the absence of a fault, we observe that the apoptosis ratio is large. DR5 and STAT3 faults reduce the value to almost half. The STAT3 inhibitor SH5-07 is unable to counter these faults. Cryptotanshinone though not able to regain the fault-free value of apoptosis, is effective in increasing apoptosis despite the presence of faults. This seems to imply that the upregulation of DR5 is instrumental to restoring TRAIL sensitivity.

The next simulation was run to test which single drug is the most effective in combination with CT. We considered the input to be TRAIL so that the input vector is ‘0010000’ and assumed that all 6 faults are simultaneously present. The results are shown in Fig. 16. The effect of LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor in combination with Cryptotanshinone seems to be better than the other combinations considered. The role of the mTOR/PI3K/AKT pathway in TRAIL resistance is confirmed by the increase in TRAIL cytotoxicity via inhibition of PI3K.

Fig. 16

Apoptosis by CT in combination with a single drug in the presence of simultaneous occurrence of all faults

The final simulation evaluates all fault combinations with all the drug combinations with and without Cryptotanshinone in Figs. 17 and 18 respectively, when only the TRAIL input is active. Each row corresponds to a different drug combination (indicated by the corresponding drug vector) while each column corresponds to a different fault combination (indicated by the corresponding fault vector). The apoptosis value in each cell in the figure, thus, is the action that a drug vector has on that particular fault vector. Both the figures follow the same color scale. The red areas show regions of low apoptosis (apoptosis ratio = 0.67) while the green areas show regions of maximum apoptosis (apoptosis ratio = 5). A visual inspection shows that CT is successful in increasing TRAIL cytotoxicity for most combinations of faults. It is our conjecture in this paper that the effect of Cryptotanshinone on TRAIL resistance is through its action on STAT3 and DR5. The simulations seem to support this as they show that even in the presence of faults in other cell signaling pathways, such as p53, CT can solely through its action on STAT3 and DR5 diminish TRAIL resistance. Figure 17 does not have a single red cell, which means that CT is more effective in inducing apoptosis than any other drug combination considered in this paper. In contrast, Fig. 18 has fewer green cells, which seems to point towards Temsirolimus, an mTORC1 inhibitor [20] to perform better than the other drugs in the absence of Cryptotanshinone. LY294002 in combination with CT seems to be the most effective drug among the ones considered in this paper. This is also what was seen in Fig. 16. The red regions in Fig. 18 correspond to a PTEN fault being active and the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 seems to keep the apoptosis ratio away from the red region despite the presence of PTEN faults. This adds to the argument that the mTOR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway contributes to TRAIL resistance, and its inhibition increases TRAIL sensitivity. An additional excel file shows the data in Figs. 17 and 18 in greater detail [see Additional file 2].

Fig. 17

All possible combinations of faults and drugs when the input is TRAIL, with Cryptotanshinone

Fig. 18

All possible combinations of faults and drugs when the input is TRAIL, without Cryptotanshinone

Experimental Validation

High-content fluorescent protein reporter imaging is used to track cellular apoptosis in a sample of A375 melanoma cells, subject to various drug treatments. A two-part data processing procedure similar to the one introduced in [45] is applied to extract cell processing dynamics. The data obtained after image processing is summarized into expression profiles and represented as plots to facilitate further evaluation. The cellular apoptosis occurring in A375 melanoma cells with respect to time is displayed in Fig. 19. The Y-axis shows the apoptotic fraction, which corresponds to the percentage of apoptosis occurring in the cell line in the given time. Table 3 explains the legend in Fig. 19 in greater detail.

Fig. 19

Experimental results for each single drug in combination with CT

Table 3 Legend for Fig. 19

It can be seen that CT in combination with the drugs one at a time is successfully inducing apoptosis in melanoma cell lines. The final value of apoptosis is similar for each combination as is also shown in Fig. 16.


We modelled the TRAIL resistant metastatic melanoma network using a Boolean network. The effects of Cryptotanshinone in combination with a few other drugs were studied. Simulations were run to study the effectiveness of Cryptotanshinone in increasing TRAIL sensitivity. The theoretically predicted efficacies seem to be borne out by the experimental results.





Multiple input multiple output


  1. 1

    Soengas MS, Lowe SW. Apoptosis and melanoma chemoresistance. Oncogene. 2003; 22:3138–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Smyth MJ, Takeda K, Hayakawa Y, Peschon JJ, van den Brink MRM, Yagita H. Nature’s TRAIL—On a Path to Cancer Immunotherapy. Immunity. 2003; 18(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Corazza N, Kassahn D, Jakob S, Badmann A, Brunner T. TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis: Between Tumor Therapy and Immunopathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1171:50–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zhang XD, Wu JJ, Gillespie S, Borrow J, Hersey P. Cross resistance of melanoma to trail-induced apoptosis and chemotherapy. Update Cancer Ther. 2006; 1(4):435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Layek R, Datta A, Bittner M, Dougherty ER. Cancer therapy design based on pathway logic. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(4):548–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Eberle J. Bcl-2 Proteins TRAIL Resistance in Melanoma. In: TRAIL, Fas Ligand, TNF and TLR3 in Cancer Resistance to Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapeutics. Springer International Publishing: 2017. p. 79–90.

  7. 7

    Tse AKW, Chow KY, Cao HH, Cheng CY, Kwan HY, Yu H, et al. The herbal compound cryptotanshinone restores sensitivity in cancer cells that are resistant to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J Cell Biochem. 2013; 288(41):29923–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(1):27–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 45(1):D353–D361.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(1):D457–D462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Thomas LW, Lam C, Edwards SW. Mcl-1; the molecular regulation of protein function. FEBS Lett. 2010; 584(14):2981–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Fleury C, Mignotte B, Vayssière JL. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in cell death signaling. Biochimie. 2002; 84(2-3):131–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Tait SWG, Green DR. Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond. Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11(9):621–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Mendoza MC, Er EE, Blenis J. The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways:cross-talk and compensation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012; 36(6):320–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Saleiro D, Platanias LC. Intersection of mTOR and STAT signaling in immunity. Trends Immunol. 2015; 36(1):21–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Flashner-Abramson E, Klein S, Mullin G, Shoshan E, Song R, Shir A, et al. Targeting melanoma with NT157 by blocking Stat3 and IGF1R signaling. Oncogene. 2016; 35:2675–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Liu H, Ma Y, Cole SM, Zander C, Chen KH, Karras J, et al. Serine phosphorylation of STAT3 is essential for Mcl-1 expression and macrophage survival. Blood. 2003; 102(1):344–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Chen W, Lu G, Yinand C, Huang S. Cryptotanshinone has diverse effects on cell cycle events in melanoma cell lines with different metastatic capacity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011; 68:17–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wei Yh, Tang Hx, Liao Yd, Fu Sl, Xu Lq, Chen G, et al. Effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor and its inhibitor AG1024 on the progress of lung cancer. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2015; 35(6):834–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Chiarini F, Grimaldi C, Ricci F, Tazzari P, Iacobucci I, Martinelli G, et al. Temsirolimus, An Allosteric mTORC1 Inhibitor, Is Synergistic with Clofarabine in AML and AML Leukemia Initiating Cells. Blood. 118; 2011:2596.

  21. 21

    Yue P, Lopez-Tapia F, Paladino D, Li Y, Chen CH, Namanja AT, et al. Hydroxamic Acid and Benzoic Acid–Based STAT3 Inhibitors Suppress Human Glioma and Breast Cancer Phenotypes In Vitro and In Vivo. Cancer Res. 2016; 76(3):652–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Jamil S, Mojtabavi S, Hojabrpour P, Cheah S, Duronio V. An Essential Role for MCL-1 in ATR-mediated CHK1 Phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008; 19(8):3212–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Hersey P, Zhang XD. How melanoma cells evade trail-induced apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001; 1:142–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Xu J, Zhou JY, Wei WZ, Wu GS. Activation of the Akt Survival Pathway Contributes to TRAIL Resistance in Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(4):e10226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Strano S, Dell’Orso S, Di Agostino S, Fontemaggi G, Sacchi A, Blandino G. Mutant p53: an oncogenic transcription factor. Oncogene. 2007; 26:2212–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Datta A, Dougherty ER. Introduction to Genomic Signal Processing with Control.Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sykes EK, Mactier S, Christopherson RI. Melanoma and the Unfolded Protein Response. Cancers. 2016; 8(3):30.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Rasmussen MK, Iversen L, Johansen C, Finnemann J, Olsen LS, Kragballe K, et al. IL-8 and p53 are inversely regulated through JNK, p38 and NF-kappaB p65 in HepG2 cells during an inflammatory response. Inflamm Res. 2008; 57(7):329–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Lin JH, Walter P, Yen BTS. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Disease Pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2008; 3:399–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Ivanov VN, Partridge MA, Huang SXL, Hei TK. Suppression of the Proinflammatory Response of Metastatic Melanoma Cells Increases TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis. J Cell Biochem. 2011; 112(2):463–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Meares GP, Liu Y, Rajbhandari R, Qin H, Nozell SE, Mobley JA, Corbett JA, et al. PERK-dependent activation of JAK1 and STAT3 contributes to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced inflammation. Mol Cell Biol. 2014; 34(20):3911–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Levy DE, Lee Ck. What does Stat3 do?J Clin Investig. 2002; 109(9):1143–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Gough DJ, Corlett A, Schlessinger K, Wegrzyn J, Larner AC, Levy DE. Mitochondrial STAT3 supports Ras-dependent oncogenic transformation. Science. 2009; 324:1713–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Yang R, Rincon M. Mitochondrial Stat3, the Need for Design Thinking. Int J Biol Sci. 2016; 12(5):532–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Quast SA, Steinhorst K, Plötz M, Eberle J. Sensitization of Melanoma Cells for Death Ligand TRAIL Is Based on Cell Cycle Arrest, ROS Production, and Activation of Proapoptotic Bcl-2 Proteins. J Investig Dermatol. 2015; 135:2794–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Nakamura H, Taguchi A, Kawana K, Kawata A, Yoshida M, Fujimoto A, et al. STAT3 activity regulates sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2016; 49(5):2155–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Ilamathi M, Sivaramakrishnan V. Artesunate acts as fuel to fire in sensitizing HepG2 cells towards TRAIL mediated apoptosis via STAT3 inhibition and DR4 augmentation. Biomed Pharmacotherapy. 2017; 88:515–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Han JY, Fan JY, Horie Y, Miura S, Cui DH, Ishii H, et al. Ameliorating effects of compounds derived from Salvia miltiorrhiza root extract on microcirculatory disturbance and target organ injury by ischemia and reperfusion. Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 117:280–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Chen W, Luo Y, Liu L, Zhou H, Xu B, Han T, Xiuzhenand S, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits cancer cell proliferation by suppressing mTOR-mediated cyclin D1 expression and Rb phosphorylation. Cancer Prev Res. 2010; 3(8):1015–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Zhang Y, Cabarcas SM, Zheng J, Sun L, Mathews LA, Zhang X, et al. Cryptotanshinone targets tumor-initiating cells through down-regulation of stemness genes expression. Oncol Lett. 2016; 11(6):3803–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Ye T, Zhu S, Zhu Y, Feng Q, He B, Xiong Y, et al. Cryptotanshinone induces melanoma cancer cells apoptosis via ROS-mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and impairs cell migration and invasion. Biomed Pharmacotherapy. 2016; 82:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Dong-Ping Y, Jun L, Yin L, Jie L, Li T. The forecast of anticancer targets of cryptotanshinone based on reverse pharmacophore-based screening technology. Chin J Nat Med. 2014; 12(6):0443–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Lu L, Zhang S, Li C, Zhou C, Li D, Liu P, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits human glioma cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo through SHP-2-dependent inhibition of STAT3 activation. Cell Death Dis. 8; 2017:2767.

  44. 44

    Chen Z, Zhu R, Zheng C, Jiayi C, Huang C, Ma J, Xu C, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits proliferation yet induces apoptosis by suppressing STAT3 signals in renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(30):50023–33.

  45. 45

    Hua J, Sima C, Cypert M, Gooden G, Shack S, Alla L, et al. Tracking transcriptional activities with high-content epifluorescent imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2012; 17:046008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Priya Venkat and Hashwanth Vundavalli for helpful discussions.


This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grants ECCS-1404314 and ECCS-1609236 and in part by the TEES-AgriLife Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering (CBGSE) startup funds. These funds provided support for personnel, lab supplies and equipment operations.

Availability of data and materials

The simulations were implemented in MATLAB. The materials supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the GitHub repository

Author information




RS and AD constructed the model and wrote the manuscript. CS, JH, RL and MB conceived and carried out the supporting experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radhika S. Saraf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1

This is the representation of a Simulink model (.slx file). The model shown was used as a reference to cross-check the results from the.m-file. It contains the exacts same Boolean network as is encoded in ’boolean_net.m’ and is shown in the Figs. 12,13 and 14. (PDF 110 kb)

Additional file 2

This is an Excel file, it is used to analyze the data from the simulations. It has two sheets ’cry’ and ’nocry’ used to generate the Figs. 17 and 18 respectively. (XLSX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saraf, R., Datta, A., Sima, C. et al. An in-silico study examining the induction of apoptosis by Cryptotanshinone in metastatic melanoma cell lines. BMC Cancer 18, 855 (2018).

Download citation


  • Melanoma
  • Trail
  • Cryptotanshinone
  • Stat3
  • Boolean networks