Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in epithelial ovarian cancer patients in Brazil

  • Simone Maistro1,
  • Natalia Teixeira2,
  • Giselly Encinas1,
  • Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama1,
  • Vivian Dionisio Tavares Niewiadonski3, 4,
  • Larissa Garcia Cabral1,
  • Roberto Marques Ribeiro3,
  • Nelson Gaburo Junior4,
  • Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves de Gouvêa5,
  • Dirce Maria Carraro6,
  • Ester Cerdeira Sabino3,
  • Maria del Pilar Estevez Diz5,
  • Roger Chammas1,
  • Geertruida Hendrika de Bock7 and
  • Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC Cancer201616:934

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2966-x

Received: 5 April 2016

Accepted: 23 November 2016

Published: 3 December 2016

Abstract

Background

Approximately 8–15% epithelial ovarian cancer patients are BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers. Brazilian inhabitants may have peculiar genetic characteristics associated with ethnic diversity, and studies focusing on the entire BRCA1/BRCA2 gene sequencing in Brazilian ovarian cancer patients are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate BRCA1/2 mutations, through entire gene sequencing, in a Brazilian population of women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

In a cross sectional study performed in one reference centre for cancer treatment in São Paulo, Brazil, 100 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer unselected for family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were included. The complete coding sequence of BRCA1/2 genes was evaluated through Next-Generation or capillary sequencing. Large deletions were investigated through Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA).

Results

Nineteen pathogenic mutations (BRCA1: n = 17 and BRCA2: n = 2) featuring 14 different mutations, including two large deletions in BRCA1 (exon 1–2 deleted and exon 5–7 deleted) were identified. Three mutations were detected more than once (c.3331_3334delCAAG, c.5266dupC and c.4484G > T). Two novel frameshift mutations were identified, one in BRCA1 (c.961_962delTG) and one in BRCA2 (c.1963_1963delC). BRCA1/2 mutations were seen in 35.5% of the patients with first and/or second-degree relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Nineteen variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were detected (BRCA1: n = 2 and BRCA2: n = 17), including five distinct missense variants (BRCA1: c.5348 T > C; BRCA2: c.2350A > G, c.3515C > T, c.7534C > T, and c.8351G > A).

Conclusions

Among epithelial ovarian cancer patients unselected for family history of cancer, 19% were BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers. Almost ¾ of the BRCA mutations, including two large deletions, were detected only once. Our work emphasizes the need of entire gene sequencing and MLPA screening in Brazil.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer BRCA1 BRCA2 Next generation sequencing MLPA

Background

Among the gynaecological malignancies, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate in developed countries and is the second leading cause of mortality in developing countries. In Brazil, 6150 new cases of ovarian cancer are expected in 2016, and in 2013, ovarian cancer accounted for 3283 deaths, indicating its importance in public health [1]. One feature that might contribute to this high mortality rate is that more than 60% of the patients are diagnosed in an advanced stage of the disease. [2].

One of the risk factors for ovarian cancer is germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, accounting for approximately 8–15% of ovarian cancer cases worldwide [35]. Although the estimated cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer by the age of 70 is 40% (95% CI 35–46%) for BRCA1 and 18% (95% CI 13–23%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers [6], the precise risk estimates vary according to the population under study, ascertainment method and applied statistical technique [7].

Detection of BRCA mutation carriers may benefit both women who were already diagnosed with ovarian cancer, as well as their unaffected family members. These patients may benefit from platinum based chemotherapy [8] and PARP inhibitors [9], while unaffected family members may benefit from genetic counselling on risk reducing surgery, such as salpingo-oophorectomy, which may reduce their chances of developing ovarian cancer by 90% [10].

Although some studies evaluated BRCA1/2 mutations in breast and/or ovarian cancer patients in our country, only a few of them have performed the entire gene sequencing, none specifically in ovarian cancer patients [1113]. Besides that, for most women with ovarian cancer, neither gene sequencing nor genetic counselling is currently available. Hence, the purpose of our work was to screen the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a series of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer unselected for age or family history for breast and/or ovarian cancer treated in Brazil.

Methods

Patients

Patients were accrued at Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) in São Paulo city, Brazil. São Paulo is the largest city in Brazil and its metropolitan area has around 18 million people [14]. ICESP integrates the Brazilian public health network (SUS, Sistema Único de Saúde), which is responsible for the health care of ¾ of our population, and is the largest reference centre for cancer treatment in Latin America [15].

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Comitê de Ética da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, reference number 132/12 and 172/13) and an informed consent was signed by each participant.

Patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, who were undergoing treatment or follow-up in the period between October 2012 and February 2015 at ICESP, were invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis in the period beginning in January 2009 until the end of the study. Data regarding the tumour characteristics was obtained from the patient files.

To characterize our patients, women were asked to report their family history of breast and ovarian cancer, birth place and ancestry (defined as place of origin of direct ancestors, until third degree). Ancestry was considered unknown if there was no information at all or if parents were born in Brazil and there was no further information for at least second-degree ancestors.

Concerning family history of breast and ovarian cancer, patients were asked to report information about first and second-degree relatives. When women were able to report on two or more female relatives (≥45 years) from both sides of the family, they were classified as having a complete informative family history.

DNA extraction from mononuclear cells

Total DNA was extracted from 10 mL blood samples using Illustra Blood GenomicPrep Mini spin kit (GE/28-9042-64, GE Healthcare Life Science) following the instructions of the manufacturer.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 entire gene sequencing

The coding regions and exon-intron boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were sequenced by Sanger sequencing (n = 39) or by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (n = 63). As a matter of comparison, two samples were analysed by both techniques, and results from both of them revealed the same single nucleotide substitutions and microdeletions.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and Sanger sequencing

The complete coding regions of BRCA1 (U14680 or NM_7294.3) and BRCA2 (U43746 or NM_000059.3), including 50–100 base pairs (bp) of non-coding sequences, flanking the 5’ and 3’ ends of each exon, were amplified by PCR using 33 pairs of primers for BRCA1 gene and 48 pairs of primers for BRCA2 gene previously employed by other authors (Additional file 1). All pathogenic mutations were confirmed through a second Sanger sequencing.

Next-generation sequencing

For the NGS analysis, the Ion AmpliSeq™ BRCA1 and BRCA2 Panel (Life technologies) was used. The panel consists of three primer pools (167 amplicons) that target the entire coding regions, including 10–20 bp of non-coding sequences, flanking the 5’ and 3’ ends of each exon. Samples were sequenced on a 314 v2 Ion Chip taking 12 samples per chip using a Personal Genome Machine (PGM) sequencer (Ion Torrent™), and the Ion PGM Sequencing 200 Kit version 2 (Life Technologies). Data analysis consisting of annotation of single-nucleotide variants, insertions, deletions, and splice site alterations was performed using the Ion Reporter™ Server System (Life Technologies). Sequence data were also visually evaluated through Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV). If a nucleotide had coverage under 50x, the affected region was re-sequenced by Sanger methodology. In addition, all pathogenic variants were re-sequenced by Sanger methodology for confirmation. Full details of methods are given in the Additional file 1.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

All patients had their DNA investigated for large rearrangements of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, specifically deletions and duplications, and CHEK2 (c.1100delC) point mutation, through the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) methodology (BRCA1: SALSA® MLPA® P002 probemix; BRCA2: SALSA® MLPA® P045 BRCA2/CHEK2 probemix; MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), as described on Additional file 1. Patients showing positive results had DNA samples analysed by a different set of MLPA probemix (BRCA1: SALSA® MLPA® P087; BRCA2: SALSA® MLPA® P077, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Classifications of variants

All sequence variants were named according to the nomenclature proposed by the Human Genome Variation Society, HGVS [16]. BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were searched in five publicly accessible databases. Additionally, gene variants were submitted to in silico prediction models, PolyPhen-2 [17], SIFT [18], Align-GVGD [19], for missense variants; Provean [20] for in-frame deletions, and Human Splicing Finder [21] to check for intronic and exonic variants leading to potential splicing defects. Minor allele frequency was checked in the 1000 Genomes Project database [22], the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) [23], the Global MAF dbSNP [24], the Exome Variant Server, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) [25]. Minor allele frequency in probands was also evaluated (Additional file 1: Table S2-S3).

The variants were then classified according to recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics in: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, likely benign and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) [26]. Variants for BRCA1 were also checked for co-occurrence with known pathogenic mutations in the same patient. When the VUS were present in two or more databases and classified as benign (BIC and ClinVar), not affect function (LOVD), 1-not pathogenic (LOVD-IARC), 1-neutral (UMD/BRCA Share™) they were considered as benign on the present analysis.

Results

One hundred women were included, with a median age at the time of diagnosis of 55.0 years (33–81 years) and at time of inclusion in this study of 56.5 years (34–81 years). The median interval between date of diagnosis and date of inclusion in the study was 18 months (1–54 months). Most patients were diagnosed with serous adenocarcinoma (84%) and advanced stage disease (clinical stages III/IV; 78%), six patients had a prior diagnosis of breast cancer (Additional file 1: Table S1). Most women were born in the Southeast region of Brazil (57%), mainly in Sao Paulo state (48%), including those born in Sao Paulo city (25%); 28% of the patients were born in the Northeast region of the country, mainly in Bahia state (12%) (Table 1). Concerning ancestry, 38% of the patients reported Brazilian only ancestors, 14% and 5% reported European only or Japanese only ancestors in both sides of the family, respectively. In addition, 7% of the patients reported at least one indigenous ancestor, in concomitance with Brazilian and/or European ancestries (Table 1). Thirty-two out of 100 patients were not able to provide a complete informative family history; 31 of the remaining 68 patients reported at least one first and/or second-degree relative with breast and/or ovarian cancer.
Table 1

Clinical and Pathological features of ovarian cancer patients according to deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations

 

BRCA 1/2 mut

BRCA1/2 wt

n = 19

n = 81

Age at diagnosis, median (range), years

54 (39–63)

55 (33–81)

Time between diagnosis and inclusion (months)

23.33 ± 14.53

19.83 ± 13.52

Histology, n (%)

 Serous

18 (94.7)

66 (81.5)

 Non-serous

1 (5.3)

15 (18.5)

Clinical Stage, n (%)

 I/II

0 (0)

21 (25.9)

 III/IV

19 (100)

59 (72.8)

 Missing

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

Region of origin, n (%)

 Southeast

9 (47.4)

48 (59.3)

 Northeast

7 (36.8)

21 (25.9)

 South

2 (10.5)

8 (9.9)

 North

1 (5.3)

1 (1.2)

 Abroad

0 (0)

2 (2.4)

 Missing

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

Ancestry until 3rd degree, n (%)

 Brazilian only

7 (36.8)

31 (38.3)

 European only

2 (10.5)

12 (14.8)

 Japanese only

1 (5.3)

4 (4.9)

 Asian only

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

 Brazilian and European

5 (26.3)

16 (19.8)

 Brazilian and Indigenous

2 (10.5)

1 (1.2)

 Indigenous and European

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

 Indigenous and Brazilian and European

2 (10.5)

1 (1.2)

 Brazilian and African

0 (0)

2 (2.5)

 Brazilian and African and European

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

 Brazilian and Japanese

0 (0)

2 (2.5)

 Unknown

0 (0)

8 (9.9)

 Missing

0 (0)

1 (1.2)

Family history for breast and/or ovarian cancer

 Positive (first and/or second-degree relatives)

11 (57.9)

20 (24.7)

 Negative

5 (26.3)

32 (39.5)

 Not Completely Known/Unknown

3(15.8)

29 (35.8)

Pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were detected in 19 patients, 17 in BRCA1 and two in BRCA2 (Table 2; Additional file 1: Table S2-S3). Mutations in BRCA1, comprised five different frameshift mutations, two of which were present in three different patients (c.3331_3334delCAAG and c.5266dupC) and one detected for the first time in the current study (c.961_962delTG). BRCA1 mutations also included two nonsense mutations in exon 11; one missense mutation (c.4484G > T, detected in two patients) and two splice site variants (c.4675 + 1G > A, in exon 15, and c.5074 + 2 T > C, in exon 17).
Table 2

BRCA1/2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients: clinical aspects and molecular description

ID

HGVS cDNA

HGVS protein

BIC name

Type

Age

Ancestry

HT

CS

FH

Reference

BRCA1

21

c.791_794delGTTC

p.Ser264Metfs

910del4

F

50–59

BRZ

S

III

NC

[30]

18

c.961_962delTG

p.(Trp321fs)

ND

F

50–59

BRZ

S

III

-

Current Study

49

c.1687C > T

p.Gln563Ter

1806C > T

N

40–49

BRZ

S

III

+

[30]

39

c.2215A > T

p.Lys739Ter

K739X

N

50–59 (BC ≤50)

BRZ

S

III

NC

[BIC]

17

c.3331_3334delCAAG

p.Gln1111Asnfs

3450del4

F

30–39

IND/BRZ/EUR

S

III

+

[5, 11, 13, 30]

42

c.3331_3334delCAAG

p.Gln1111Asnfs

3450del4

F

50–59

IND/BRZ/EUR

S

III

+

[5, 11, 13, 30]

107

c.3331_3334delCAAG

p.Gln1111Asnfs

3450del4

F

50–59 (BC ≤50)

BRZ/EUR

E

III

+

[5, 11, 13, 30]

50

c.4484G > T

p.Arg1495Met

R1495M

M

30–39

BRZ

S

III

-

[4]

37

c.4484G > T

p.Arg1495Met

R1495M

M

50–59

IND/BRZ

S

IV

+

[4]

106

c.4675+1G > A

-

IVS15+1G >A

Ss

40–49

BRZ/EUR

S

III

-

[4]

67

c.5074+2 T > C

-

IVS17+2 T >C

Ss

60–69

BRZ/EUR

S

III

+

[BIC]

85

c.5098_5098delA

p.Thr1700Hisfs

5217delA

F

40–49

BRZ/EUR

S

IV

-

[BIC]

26

c.5266dupC

p.Gln1756Profs

5382insC

F

50–59

EUR

S

IV

+

[11, 13, 32]

56

c.5266dupC

p.Gln1756Profs

5382insC

F

50–59 (BC ≤50)

BRZ

S

III

+

[11, 13, 32]

108

c.5266dupC

p.Gln1756Profs

5382insC

F

40–49

IND/BRZ

S

III

UK

[11, 13, 32]

101

Exon 1–2 deleteda

-

-

LGR

50–59

BRZ

S

III

+

[37, 38]

9

Exon 5–7 deleteda

-

-

LGR

50–59

BRZ /EUR

S

III

-

[37, 38]

BRCA2

74

c.1963_1963delC

p.(Pro655fs)

ND

F

60–69

EUR

S

III

+

Current Study

102

c.5576_5579delTTAA

p.Ile1859_Lys1860?fs

5804del4

F

60–69

JAP

S

III

+

[30]

ID patient identification; Type: F frameshift, N nonsense, M missense, Ss splice site, LGR large genomic rearrangement; Age in years (range); BC previous breast cancer history; Ancestry: BRZ Brazilian, IND Indigenous, EUR European, JAP Japanese, CS clinical stage, HT histological type, S serous, E endometrioid, FH family history for breast and/or ovarian cancer: (+): present, (−): absent, NC not completely known, UK unknown, BIC breast cancer information core, ND not described mutation

aIndicates mutations detected by MLPA

BRCA1 rearrangements were identified in two patients (Table 2). One patient presented one large deletion involving exons 5, 6 and 7, detected by two different sets of MLPA probemix (SALSA® MLPA® P002 and SALSA® MLPA® P087). Another patient displayed an inconclusive result using SALSA® MLPA® P002 BRCA1 probemix, which provided questionable low signals for the 1a, 1b and 2 exons repeatedly, probably due to incomplete denaturation of the CpG islands near these exons. A confirmatory MLPA reaction with a second set of probes (SALSA® MLPA® P087 BRCA1 probemix) corroborated the presence of this rearrangement.

Pathogenic mutations in BRCA2, both frameshift, were detected in only two patients, one of them identified for the first time in the present study (c.1963_1963delC, exon 11). A suspected deletion of BRCA2 exon 15 was at first detected, but was not confirmed. This patient harboured a missense variant (c.7534C > T; variant of uncertain significance) localized within one of the BRCA2 probes of SALSA® MLPA® P045, which may have interfered in the result and reduced the signal of exon 15. A confirmatory MLPA reaction, using SALSA® MLPA®P077, employing different probes, did not reveal a reduced peak for exon 15, indicating the absence of a true deletion.

All patients were checked for c.1100delC point mutation of CHEK2, however, none was detected.

There was no difference between the median age at diagnosis from patients who were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or non-carriers. All mutation carriers were diagnosed with advanced disease (clinical stages III/IV). Considering the birth place, nine out of 57 women (15.8%) born in the Southeast region and seven out of 28 (25%) born in the Northeast region harboured a BRCA1/2 mutation. Among 38 patients who reported Brazilian only ancestry, seven were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (18.4%) and among seven patients who reported at least one indigenous ancestry four (57.1%) were mutation carriers (Table 1). Among the 68 patients with informative family history for breast and/or ovarian cancer, 35.5% with and 13.5% without any affected first and/or second-degree relatives were BRCA1/2 mutations carriers. Although all two patients who were BRCA2 mutation carriers were aged at least 60 years, almost all (16/17) women who were BRCA1 mutation carriers were aged less than 60.

Nineteen variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were detected, two in BRCA1 and seventeen in BRCA2 gene. Among the VUS, five distinct missense variants were identified, one in BRCA1 and four in BRCA2, among which, three, BRCA1 c.5348 T > C, BRCA2 c.3515C > T and BRCA2 c.8351G > A were predicted deleterious in at least three of four mutation function prediction models (Polyhen-2, SIFT, Provean or Align GVGD) (Table 3). The remaining VUS were synonymous (n = 4) or were located in intronic regions, at least eight nucleotides away from the intron-exon boundary (n = 10).
Table 3

Analysis of missense variants from BRCA1/2 gene of uncertain significance using mutation function prediction models

Gene

Exon

HDVS cDNA

HGVS protein

PolyPhen

SIFT

Provean

Align GVGD

Human splice finder

ID

BRCA1

22

c.5348 T > C

p.Met1783Thr

Probably Damaging

Damaging

Neutral

Class C45

-

94

BRCA2

11

c.2350A > G

p.Met784Val

Benign

Tolerated

Neutral

Class C0

Activation of an exonic cryptic donor site / Creation of an exonic ESS site / Alteration of an exonic ESE site.

35

11

c.3515C > T

p.Ser1172Leu

Probably Damaging

Damaging

Deleterious

Class C0

Creation of an exonic ESS site/Alteration of an exonic ESE site.

25

15

c.7534C > T

p.Leu2512Phe

Probably Damaging

Damaging

Neutral

Class C0

Alteration of an intronic ESS site.

47

19

c.8351G > A

p.Arg2784Gln

Probably Damaging

Damaging

Neutral

Class C35

Activation of an exonic cryptic acceptor site

111

Presence of one or more cryptic branch point.

HGVS Human Genome Variation Society, PolyPhen: Variant Benign, Possibly damaging and Probably damaging; SIFT: Variant Tolerated (benign) or Damaging; Provean: Neutral or Deleterius; Align GVGD: Class C0 (Less likely to interfere in protein function), C15, C25, C35, C45, C55, C65 (More likely to interfere in protein function); ID: patient identification

Discussion

In this cohort, 19 out of 100 unselected Brazilian ovarian cancer patients, were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, mainly in the BRCA1 gene (n = 17). In BRCA1 gene, 12 different mutations were detected, including one new frameshift and two large deletions. In BRCA2 gene, only two pathogenic mutations, including a new frameshift mutation were found. In addition, another five missense VUS were identified in five different patients. Concerning their ancestry, 18.4% of the patients who reported Brazilian only ancestors and 26.3% of those who reported European ancestry, in at least one side of the family, were mutation carriers. In addition, 35.5% of the patients with and 13.5% of the patients without first and/or second-degree relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancer were BRCA1/2 mutations carriers.

A prevalence of 19% BRCA1/2 mutation rate seems somewhat higher than previously described for women with ovarian cancer from other countries, such as Canada (13.4%) [4] and Colombia (15%) [5]. However, one might claim that we had a cohort enriched in BRCA mutation carriers, due to time selection, taking into consideration that germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 is associated with an improved 5-year overall survival and that a few patients were diagnosed long before their enrolment in the project [27, 28]. Contrary to this is the fact that the mean time between dates of diagnosis and enrolment was similar in both BRCA1/2 mutation and BRCA1/2 wild type carriers.

In accordance with previous studies, our patients with ovarian cancer were mainly BRCA1 mutation carriers [4], however only one out of 12 different mutations, c.2215A > T, was located in a putative ovarian cancer cluster region (OCCR) of exon 11, an hypothesized region associated with increased risk estimates for ovarian cancer [29]. Remarkably was that this patient had breast cancer before the ovarian cancer.

Three mutations in BRCA1 gene were detected more than once: c.3331_3334delCAAG, c.5266dupC and c.4484G > T. BRCA1 c.3331_3334delCAAG mutation in exon 11, is also a frequent mutation in ovarian cancer patients from Colombia [5] and Spain [30], but mostly rare in Canadian patients [4]. This mutation was already reported in Brazilian patients [11, 13]. A previous haplotype study suggested that it could represent a founder effect of Spanish origin [31], and curiously all our three patients reported European ancestries, two of them from the Iberian Peninsula, more specifically, from Portugal.

Another frequent mutation detected in our ovarian cancer patients was the one commonly found in the Ashkenazi Jewish, BRCA1 c.5266dupC (5382insC), however none of them reported Jewish ancestry. This mutation is one of the most commonly found in Brazilian breast and/or ovarian cancer patients [11, 13, 32]. In addition, one meta-analysis reported that BRCA1 c.5266dupC is the fourth most prevalent in Latin America [33]. Interestingly, a haplotype study revealed that BRCA1 c.5266dupC originated from a single common ancestor around 1800 years ago in northern Russia and spread to various populations, including Ashkenazi Jewish people [34]. In accordance, a common origin for this mutation in our country was previously reported for breast cancer patients [35, 36].

Two patients presented the BRCA1 c.4484G > T missense mutation, which involves the last nucleotide of exon 14, resulting in skipping of exon 14. This mutation was previously found in ovarian cancer patients and associated with causality [4]. Other mutations in BRCA1 detected in the present work were already described, as shown in Table 2, except for c.961_962delTG frameshift variant, characterized for the first time in this study.

Comparing BRCA1 mutations detected in our study of Brazilian ovarian cancer patients with those reported in breast cancer patients [1113], it is interesting to observe that they are concordant with respect to the most recurrent variant, BRCA1 c.5266dupC, that also is one of the most commonly found in Latin American breast cancer patients [33]. However, there is a difference in relation to variant c.3331_3334delCAAG, that was rarely found in patients with breast cancer.

Only two pathogenic mutations were detected in BRCA2 gene, including one novel frameshift mutation, c.1963_1963delC, and another one, c.5576_5579delTTAA, in a patient with Japanese ancestry. The latter mutation is located in an ovarian cancer cluster region (OCCR) of exon 11, which is bound by c.3249 and c.5681 [29].

Another mechanism of gene inactivation, namely the rearrangement of large tracts of genomic DNA, was detected in two patients (BRCA1: exon 1–2 deleted and exon 5–7 deleted). Deletion of exons 1a-2, which may affect production and/or stability of the transcript [37, 38], is the third most frequent in Latin American breast cancer patients [33]. In your study, this deletion was identified in a woman who was diagnosed with ovarian cancer at the age of 52 and reported a family history of ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer. The removal of exons 5–7 from gene BRCA1 causes a frameshift in protein translation [37]. This deletion was identified in a woman with ovarian cancer aged 57 years, who reported an European ancestry but did not recall any family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. This mutation was previously described in one German patient with positive family history for breast cancer and ovarian cancer [37] and one Italian patient with breast cancer [38].

In our study, CHEK2 mutations were not detected, in accordance with other previous studies, that in total analysed an additional 21 Brazilian ovarian cancer patients. [12, 39].

A strength of our study is that the entire BRCA1/2 gene was screened for the first time in a population of women with epithelial ovarian cancer from Brazil, unselected for age and family history. A weakness however, is the small sample size was analysed. In a recently published study, the prevalence of a panel of eight mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, mainly detected in Ashkenazi Jewish or people from Russia or Poland, was investigated in 106 ovarian cancer patients treated at the Federal Hospital in Minas Gerais state, which is neighbour to São Paulo state. None of the participants were found to carry any of the genotyped mutations [40]. In our study, among nine patients born in Minas Gerais state, one harboured a BRCA1 mutation (c.4675 + 1G > A) not investigated in the previous study (Table 2). In addition, in another study performed in our city, a few patients with ovarian cancer were enrolled for entire BRCA1/2 gene sequencing. BRCA1 mutation was detected in one out of three patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer and in four out of nine with both breast and ovarian cancer [12].

Considering that Brazil is a huge country inhabited by people from different origins and that our patients come from different regions of the country, we evaluated BRCA1/2 mutation status considering their birth place and ancestry. Our study mainly reflects Brazilian patients born in São Paulo state or in the Northeast region of Brazil with Brazilian and/or European ancestries. In the current study 14 different variants were detected in 100 patients. These different variants may reflect the ethnic diversity and miscegenation of people that live in Brazil. Corroborating this hypothesis, genetic polymorphisms analysis have already revealed that the average Brazilian population has unique characteristics, comprehending a mixture of European, African and Amerindian ancestry genes [41]. It is interesting to observe that, 15 out of 16 BRCA1 mutation carriers, reported Brazilian ancestry in one or both sides of the family, which means that, as long as they were aware, their ancestors were born in Brazil.

Conclusion

In this cohort of epithelial ovarian cancer patients, the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutation was 19%, mostly detected in different gene locations. Two novel frameshift mutations were identified, one in BRCA1 and one in BRCA2, as well as two large deletions. These data emphasize that entire gene sequencing of both BRCA1 and BRCA2 as well as MLPA screening should be offered to all Brazilian ovarian cancer patients.

Abbreviations

Align-GVGD: 

Grantham Variation (GV) which measures the degree of biochemical variation among amino acids found at a given position in the multiple sequence alignment, Grantham Deviation (GD), which reflects the ‘biochemical distance’ of the mutant amino acid from the observed amino acid at a particular position.

BIC: 

Breast cancer information core

bp: 

Base pairs

dbSNP: 

The single nucleotide polymorphism database

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ESP: 

Exome sequencing project

ExAC: 

The exome aggregation consortium

HGVS: 

Human Genome Variation Society

ICESP: 

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo

IGV: 

Integrative genomics viewer

LOVD: 

Leiden open variation database

LOVD-IARC: 

Leiden open variation database - The International Agency for Research on Cancer

MAF: 

Minor allele frequency

MLPA: 

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

NGS: 

Next-generation sequencing

OCCR: 

Ovarian cancer cluster region

PARP: 

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PGM: 

Personal genome machine

PolyPhen-2: 

Polymorphism Phenotyping v2

Provean: 

Protein variation effect analyzer

SIFT: 

Sorting intolerant from tolerant

SUS: 

Sistema Único de Saúde (Brazilian Public Health System)

UMD: 

Universal mutation database

VUS: 

Variant of uncertain significance

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Maristela Taliari Pimenta, Patologia Molecular e Genômica para Diagnósticos, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil, for performing MLPA analysis and Citogem Biotecnologia for donating BRCA1: SALSA® MLPA® P087; BRCA2: SALSA® MLPA® P077 kits. We are also grateful to Brazilian Funding Agencies FAPESP, CNPq, and CAPES for financial support.

Funding

Geertruida Hendrika de Bock received a grant of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Programa Pesquisador Visitante Especial (PVE #029/2012), Simone Maistro received a postdoctoral scholarship by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, PVE #029/2012), Giselly Encinas received a PhD scholarship grant by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, #2011/09572-1) and Natalia Teixeira received a scholarship grant by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, #2012/05754-1).

This work was in part supported by a grant from Diagnósticos da América -DASA and by a grant from NAP-Biobanco/USP.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files (Table S1. Clinical and pathological characteristics, BRCA sequencing and MLPA results. Table S2. BRCA1 gene variants. Table S3. BRCA2 gene variants).

Authors' contributions

SM, NT, GHdB, and MAAKF conceived the study. SM, NT, ACRCG, and MDPED included patients and collected clinical data. SM, LC, NG, VDTN, RMR and MLHK performed the experiments. SM, NT, DMC, GHdB, and MAAKF analyzed data. SM, GE, LC, ECS and MLHK analyzed mutational data. SM, NT, DMC, RC, GHdB and MAAKF interpreted data. SM, GHdB and MAAKF drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

An informed consent, including an agreement to anonymously report results, was signed by each participant.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Comitê de Ética da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, reference number 172/13 and 132/12) and an informed consent was signed by each participant.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
(3)
Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo
(4)
Departamento de Diagnóstico Molecular, DASA
(5)
Divisão de Oncologia Clínica, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
(6)
International Reasearch Center, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center
(7)
Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen

References

  1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Câncer – INCA, 2016. http://www2.inca.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/tiposdecancer/site/home/ovario. Accessed 3 Jan 2016.
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA, Krischer JP, Fiorica J, Arango H, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer. 2005;104:2807–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang S, Royer R, Li S, McLaughlin JR, Rosen B, Risch HA, et al. Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:353–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rodríguez AO, Llacuachaqui M, Pardo GG, Royer R, Larson G, Weitzel JN, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among ovarian cancer patients from Colombia. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:236–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Vos JR, Mourits MJ, Teixeira N, Jansen L, Oosterwijk JC, de Bock GH. Inverse birth cohort effects in ovarian cancer: Increasing risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and decreasing risk in the general population. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:289–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vencken PM, Kriege M, Hoogwerf D, Beugelink S, van der Burg ME, Hooning MJ, et al. Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1346–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu JF, Konstantinopoulos PA, Matulonis UA. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: current status and future promise. Review. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;33:362–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. van Driel CM, de Bock GH, Arts HJ, Sie AS, Hollema H, Oosterwijk JC, et al. Stopping ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: effects on risk management decisions & outcome of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens. Maturitas. 2015;80:318–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carraro DM, Koike Folgueira MA, Garcia Lisboa BC, Ribeiro Olivieri EH, Vitorino Krepischi AC, de Carvalho AF, et al. Comprehensive analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutation and tumor characterization: a portrait of early-onset breast cancer in Brazil. PLoS One. 2013;8, e57581.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Silva FC, Lisboa BC, Figueiredo MC, Torrezan GT, Santos EM, Krepischi AC, et al. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: assessment of point mutations and copy number variations in Brazilian patients. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Alemar B, Herzog J, Brinckmann Oliveira Netto C, Artigalás O, Schwartz IV, Matzenbacher Bittar C, et al. Prevalence of Hispanic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients from Brazil reveals differences among Latin American populations. Cancer Genet. 2016;209:417–422.Google Scholar
  14. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) Database. http://www.censo2010.ibge.gov.br/sinopse/index.php?uf=35&dados=0. Accessed 6 Jan 2016
  15. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (ICESP). http://icesp.org.br/. Accessed 6 Jan 2016
  16. Human Genome Variation Society, HGVS. http://www.hgvs.org. Accessed 1 Oct 2015.
  17. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res. 2001;11:863–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Tavtigian SV, Deffenbaugh AM, Yin L, Judkins T, Scholl T, Samollow PB, et al. Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral. J Med Genet. 2006;43:295–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7, e46688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Béroud G, Claustres M, Béroud C. Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37, e67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491:56–65.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) Databases. http://exac.broadinstitute.org. Accessed 31 Nov 2015.
  24. Global MAF dbSNP Databases. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp. Accessed 31 Nov 2015.
  25. Exome Variant Server, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Databases. http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/. Accessed 31 Nov 2015.
  26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Bolton KL, Chenevix-Trench G, Goh C, Sadetzki S, Ramus SJ, Karlan BY, et al. Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2012;307:382–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Chetrit A, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, Ben-David Y, Lubin F, Friedman E, Sadetzki S. Effect of BRCA1/2 mutations on long-term survival of patients with invasive ovarian cancer: the national Israeli study of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:20–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rebbeck TR, Mitra N, Wan F, Sinilnikova OM, Healey S, McGuffog L, et al. Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2015;313:1347–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Blay P, Santamaría I, Pitiot AS, Luque M, Alvarado MG, Lastra A, et al. Mutational analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families from Asturias (Northern Spain). BMC Cancer. 2013;13:243.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Torres D, Rashid MU, Gil F, Umana A, Ramelli G, Robledo JF, Tawil M, Torregrosa L, Briceno I, Hamann U. High proportion of BRCA1/2 founder mutations in Hispanic breast/ovarian cancer families from Colombia. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;103:225–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ewald IP, Izetti P, Vargas FR, Moreira MA, Moreira AS, Moreira-Filho CA, et al. Prevalence of the BRCA1 founder mutation c.5266dupin Brazilian individuals at-risk for the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2011;9:12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Porchia LM, Gonzalez-Mejia ME, Calderilla-Barbosa L, Ordaz-Diaz N, Islas F, et al. Common BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations among Latin American breast cancer subjects: a meta-analysis. J Carcinogene Mutagene. 2015;6:228.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamel N, Feng BJ, Foretova L, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Narod SA, et al. On the origin and diffusion of BRCA1 c.5266dupC (5382insC) in European populations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19:300–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. da Costa EC, Vargas FR, Moreira AS, Lourenço JJ, Caleffi M, Ashton-Prolla P, et al. Founder effect of the BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Brazilian patients with hereditary breast ovary cancer syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;184:62–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ossa CA, Torres D. Founder and Recurrent Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Latin American Countries: State of the Art and Literature Review. Oncologist. 2016;21:832–9. Review.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Preisler-Adams S, Schönbuchner I, Fiebig B, Welling B, Dworniczak B, Weber BH. Gross rearrangements in BRCA1 but not BRCA2 play a notable role in predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer in high-risk families of German origin. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;168:44–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Agata S, Viel A, Della Puppa L, Cortesi L, Fersini G, Callegaro M, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 genomic rearrangements in a large cohort of Italian breast and breast/ovarian cancer families without detectable BRCA1 and BRCA2 point mutations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45:791–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Felix GES, Sandes CA, Machado-Lopes TMB, Bonfim TF, Guindalini RSC, Santos VCSAR, et al. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and TP53 in patients at high-risk for HBOC: characterizing a Northeast Brazilian population. Hum Genome Var. 2014;1:14012.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Schayek H, De Marco L, Starinsky-Elbaz S, Rossette M, Laitman Y, Bastos-Rodrigues L, et al. The rate of recurrent BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 mutations in the general population, and unselected ovarian cancer cases, in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Cancer Genet. 2016;209:50–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pena SD, Di Pietro G, Fuchshuber-Moraes M, Genro JP, Hutz MH, Kehdy Fde S, et al. The genomic ancestry of individuals from different geographical regions of Brazil is more uniform than expected. PLoS One. 2011;6, e17063.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016